懒笔记
2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3)
CET-4 · 来自 2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 · Part II Section A (3) · 听力

2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3)

新闻报道 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章的精读视角页——这篇新闻报道全文 174 词、5 段，CEFR 难度 B2（B2 级在英语四级文章中占 46%），作者立场为「客观中立」；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

5 段英文原文

以下为2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 的听力原文，共 5 段。左侧 P1–P5 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

A German supermarket has been ordered to destroy its chocolate rabbits after it lost a court battle with a Swiss chocolate manufacturer.

The Swiss firm had argued its gold-wrapped chocolate rabbit deserved copyright protection from a similar product sold by the budget supermarket.

Switzerland's highest court agreed and overturned a ruling last year by the country's commercial court that had sided with the supermarket. It ordered that all the imitation rabbits be destroyed, but suggested the chocolate needn't be wasted. It could be melted for use in other products.

It said even though there are some differences between the two products, there was still the possibility of confusion for consumers. The Swiss manufacturer's rabbit has a red bow and bell, while the German supermarket's has a green bow and bell. The colour of the wrapper is similar, as are the illustrations of the features.

The chocolate company has been to court before to protect its popular chocolate treat. Last year, a German federal court said the shade of the gold wrapping was also protected.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

5 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读，并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Court Orders Rabbit Destruction

    A German supermarket was ordered to destroy chocolate rabbits after losing a legal battle to a Swiss manufacturer.

    本段为全文提供了最核心的 news hook，即德国超市被要求销毁产品这一结果。它与文章主旨中的 must destroy 和 court ruled 相对应，先让读者知道事件 outcome，再引导读者阅读后文的版权理由、相似细节及案件背景。

    锁定裁决结果
  2. P2

    The Manufacturer's Copyright Claim

    The Swiss manufacturer sought copyright protection for its gold-wrapped rabbit against a similar supermarket product.

    本段承担解释 conflict origin 的作用，回答读者“为什么会有第一段的销毁命令”。它将文章主旨中的 infringed on a Swiss manufacturer's copyright 具体化为瑞士公司对金色包装兔外观的 protection claim。

    抓住原告诉求
  3. P3

    Top Court Reverses Earlier Ruling

    Switzerland's highest court reversed the earlier decision, ordered the imitation rabbits destroyed, and allowed the chocolate to be reused.

    本段是全文的 legal center，完整说明第一段结论是如何形成的，并补充巧克力可回收的处理方式。它对应文章主旨中的 highest court ruled、ordered the chocolate be melted for reuse，使报道从 headline-level fact 发展为可理解的裁决过程。

    梳理判决后果
  4. P4

    Why Consumers Could Be Confused

    Despite different bow colors, the rabbits were similar enough to create possible consumer confusion.

    本段为最高法院的裁决提供了最具体的 factual justification，即消费者可能把两类产品混淆。它直接对应文章主旨中的 citing potential consumer confusion despite differences in bow colors，是全文论证链条中最关键的证据说明。

    看透让步转折
  5. P5

    A History of Protecting the Brand

    The company has a history of using the courts to protect its chocolate rabbit and its distinctive gold wrapping.

    本段扩展了报道的背景深度，说明本次诉讼属于公司长期 brand protection strategy 的延续。它进一步解释了为什么金色包装会成为争议重点，并使文章主旨中的 copyright dispute 具有更清晰的历史与法律语境。

    串联既往案例
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

5 道逐段细节自检题

针对2025年12月英语四级真题第1套这篇原文，每段配 1 道细节题（ 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ，由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制，非试卷原题）。 选项默认中性；点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法，现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 German supermarket court battle

    What was the immediate consequence for the German supermarket after the court battle?

    • A It was granted copyright protection for its product.
    • B It was allowed to keep selling the rabbits with a green bow.
    • C It was ordered to destroy its chocolate rabbits.
    • D It had to change the colour of the gold wrapper.
    • E It was asked to pay for the Swiss firm's legal costs.
    • F It was permitted to melt the rabbits before selling them.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    正确项完整对应 ordered to destroy its chocolate rabbits，保留了强制语气 ordered 和处置对象 chocolate rabbits。题目设置的障碍在于，新闻首段常把事件原因与结果连续呈现；考生若只抓住 lost a court battle，容易停在“败诉”这一中间事实，忽略真正被问的 immediate consequence。

    谓语链三格核对 时间极紧时，直接在 第1段 用 German supermarket 进行视觉锚定，不必通读全文；随后只读取该名词后面的谓语链。将选项压缩成“谁 + 被怎样处置 + 什么对象”，与原句做三格核对，三格完全一致的正确项即为答案项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 Swiss firm gold-wrapped chocolate rabbit

    What protection did the Swiss firm seek for its gold-wrapped chocolate rabbit?

    • A Permission to use a green bow and bell.
    • B A court order to destroy all chocolate products.
    • C Exclusive rights to sell chocolate in Germany.
    • D Copyright protection from a similar competing product.
    • E Protection for every shade of gold wrapping.
    • F The right to reuse melted chocolate in other products.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    该项概括了 deserved copyright protection from a similar product，既保留权利类型 copyright protection，也保留保护针对的竞争性风险。障碍在于原文用 deserved 表示公司立场，题干改用 seek 概括诉求；考生必须识别这是同一语义，而非拘泥于逐词重复。

    长词组右读 在 第2段，不要从 protection 这个高频抽象词开始读，而是先抓 gold-wrapped chocolate rabbit 这一长词组，并向右读取 argued 后的宾语补足信息。随后用“权利类别 + 防范对象”两栏筛选，完整对应两栏的正确项即为答案项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 imitation rabbits melted

    What did the court suggest could be done with the chocolate from the imitation rabbits?

    • A It had to be discarded together with the rabbits.
    • B It could be returned to the Swiss manufacturer.
    • C It was to be sold at a lower price by the supermarket.
    • D It could be used to make more gold wrappers.
    • E It could be melted for use in other products.
    • F It had to be given to consumers for free.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：E

    正确项准确保留 could be melted for use in other products，回答的是 chocolate 的后续去向，而不是 rabbits 的法律命运。障碍是前一句的 all the imitation rabbits be destroyed 容易造成强烈记忆，考生需借 but 识别后面给出的“避免浪费”的例外性信息。

    转折后例外盒 直接进入 第3段，扫读含有 imitation rabbits 的句子，并把 but 后面的分句单独视为一个“例外信息盒”。不必分析整段诉讼过程，只将正确项与这个盒子的“材料处理动作 + 新用途”进行匹配，即可判定答案项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 consumers red bow and bell

    Why did the court believe the two chocolate rabbits could still cause concern?

    • A Both rabbits had the same red bow and bell.
    • B The supermarket had copied the Swiss firm's name.
    • C Consumers preferred the budget supermarket's chocolate.
    • D The gold wrapping had been ruled illegal in Germany.
    • E The Swiss manufacturer had stopped making chocolate rabbits.
    • F Their similar appearance could confuse consumers.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：F

    正确项把 possibility of confusion for consumers 概括为 similar appearance could confuse consumers，并由后文相似的 wrapper colour 和 illustrations 提供事实支撑。障碍在于文中同时列出 red bow 与 green bow 的不同，考生必须理解这些是 even though 后被承认的差异，而非法院担忧的最终原因。

    仍然之后找结论 在 第4段 用 still 作视觉钩子，直接读取其后的风险结论，再回看后续句子核验法院列出的外观证据。答题时不必逐个记忆全部产品特征；只需判断正确项中的原因和结果是否构成原文支持的完整因果链。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 German federal court last year

    What did a German federal court protect last year?

    • A The shade of the gold wrapping.
    • B The green bow and bell on the supermarket's rabbit.
    • C All illustrations of chocolate rabbits.
    • D The Swiss firm's right to destroy imitation products.
    • E The popular chocolate treat as a food product.
    • F The commercial court's ruling in Switzerland.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：A

    正确项精确对应 the shade of the gold wrapping was also protected。关键障碍在于保护对象不是泛指 gold wrapping，更不是整个 chocolate rabbit；the shade 表示颜色的特定色调，also 则提示这是在其他保护基础上新增的背景信息。

    名词缩小测试 在 第5段 以 German federal court 为唯一视觉锚点，直接向后寻找 protected 对应的语法对象。最高效的判定方式是执行“名词缩小测试”：从 chocolate treat 到 gold wrapping，再到其 shade，选择与 protected 对应且范围最精确的正确项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的新闻报道骨架

按新闻报道 的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. P1

    核心事件导语

    这是典型的 news lead,用一句话 deliver 了整个 story 的核心 facts:German supermarket 被 ordered to destroy 其 chocolate rabbits,原因是 lost a court battle 给 Swiss manufacturer。Lead 直接点明了 who (German supermarket vs Swiss manufacturer)、what (destroy chocolate rabbits)、why (court battle lost),符合新闻报道 inverted pyramid 的开篇特征。

    作为 headline news 的 lead paragraph,它 establish 了整篇报道的 central event,让 readers 立即 grasp 住关键信息:supermarket 必须 destroy products 因为 legal ruling。这个 opening 为后续 details 的展开 set the stage,是 news story 的 attention grabber。

    事件主体呈现
  2. P2

    诉讼理由阐述

    这个 paragraph 是对 lead 中 court battle 的 immediate explanation,focus 在 Swiss firm 的 argument:其 gold-wrapped chocolate rabbit 应该 deserve copyright protection。用 had argued 的 past perfect tense 表明这是 leading up to 前面 verdict 的 background cause,typical 的 news report 的 cause-effect layering。

    在 lead 建立了 what happened 之后,这个 sense group 回答 why it happened,provide 了 legal basis。它 introduce 了 copyright protection 这个 key concept,解释了 Swiss manufacturer 为什么 take legal action。这是 news story 的 essential background layer,让 readers understand 这不是 arbitrary ruling,而是基于 intellectual property rights 的 legal dispute。

    法律依据说明
  3. P3

    法院裁决详情

    这个 paragraph 是 detailed ruling,包含三个 key elements:highest court agreed (判决立场)、overturned lower court (司法层级关系)、ordered destruction but suggested recycling (具体 orders)。它 provide 了 judicial process 的 complexity 和 nuanced decision,用 agreed, overturned, ordered, suggested 这些 legal verbs 构建了 complete picture of the verdict。

    这个 sense group 是对 lead 的 crucial elaboration,它不仅 confirm 了 highest court 的 final authority,还 reveal 了一个 interesting detail:chocolate 可以 melted for reuse,显示 court 的 practical consideration。这 add depth 到简单的 'must destroy' statement,show 了 judicial decision 的 thoroughness 和 reasonableness,对 readers 的 understanding 有 enriching effect。

    裁决细节扩展
  4. P4

    判决依据论证

    这个 paragraph 深入到 court's reasoning,explain 为什么 despite some differences (red vs green bow) 仍然判定侵权。用 even though 引出 concession,然后用 still the possibility of confusion 点出 key criterion。接着 provide 了 specific visual comparison:bow color, wrapper color, feature illustrations,这是 evidence-based reasoning,typical 的 legal analysis structure。

    这个 sense group 是 critical,因为它 address 了 potential reader question:'既然有 differences,为什么还判侵权?' 它 provide 了 legal standard ('consumer confusion'),并用 concrete details (bow colors, wrapper similarity, illustrations) 来 support the ruling。这 strengthen 了 court decision 的 credibility,让整个 story 不是 just reporting a verdict,而是 explaining the legal logic behind it。

    混淆可能性证明
  5. P5

    历史背景补充

    这个 closing paragraph 提供 broader context,reveal 这不是 isolated case:chocolate company has been to court before 并且 last year 还有 similar ruling about gold wrapping shade。用 Last year 和 before 建立 temporal context,show 这是 ongoing legal battle 的 part,为 current case 提供 historical perspective。

    这个 final sense group 的 function 是 contextualization,它告诉 readers 这个 verdict 不是 surprise 或 anomaly,而是 consistent with previous rulings。这 add significance 到 current case,show Swiss manufacturer 对 brand protection 的 persistence 和 German courts 对 intellectual property 的 consistent stance。它让 story 不是 isolated incident 而是 part of larger pattern,give readers 更 complete understanding。

    维权历史呈现
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首段定位核心事件 P1

    新闻报道遵循 inverted pyramid structure，most important information 往往放在 opening paragraph，第一段通常会 present 整个新闻的 central event，为后续 details 提供 framework。

  2. 中段提取权威裁决 P3 P4

    新闻报道需要 establish credibility，所以会在 middle paragraphs 提供 official sources 和 concrete details 来 support 首段的 claim。这些 details 不仅 verify 事件真实性，还 elaborate on 事件的 significance。

  3. 对比细节找争议点 P2 P4

    新闻报道在 explain complex situations 时会 provide contrasting information，帮助读者 understand 争议的 nature 和 court decision 的 rationale。这些 comparative elements 是 comprehend 主旨不可或缺的 context。

  4. 整合事件判决依据 P1 P3 P4

    主旨不是 isolated sentence，而是 integration of multiple key elements。新闻报道的主旨需要 capture event、outcome 和 reasoning，只有 combine 这些 aspects 才能 form accurate understanding。

主旨信号词 ordered to destroy P1 lost a court battle P1 highest court agreed P3 possibility of confusion P4 overturned a ruling P3

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

瑞士最高法院裁定一家德国超市的巧克力兔子侵犯了瑞士制造商的版权，因可能造成消费者混淆，尽管蝴蝶结颜色有差异，法院下令销毁这些兔子，但建议可将巧克力融化再利用。
A German supermarket must destroy its chocolate rabbits after Switzerland's highest court ruled they infringed on a Swiss manufacturer's copyright, citing potential consumer confusion despite differences in bow colors, and ordered the chocolate be melted for reuse.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • overturn 推翻、撤销（判决或决定）

    让我们把这些 clues 串联起来：首先，从 contextual opposition 我们知道最高法院和商业法院的 stance 相反；其次，从 morphology 我们理解 over- + turn 暗示一种 reversal action；最后，从 consequence 我们验证了这个动作确实导致了对超市不利的 outcome。三条线索共同指向同一个 meaning：推翻、撤销原有的裁决。

    利益方立场分析法
  • imitation 仿制品、模仿品

    整合这些 evidence：copyright dispute context 告诉我们这是关于 unauthorized copying；morphological structure 表明这是一个 action noun；detailed product comparison 展示了 concrete manifestation——高度相似但非原创。所有 clues 一致指向：imitation 指的是模仿、仿制的产品或行为。

    三角验证定位法
  • illustration 图案、图解、插图

    综合这些 clues：syntactic parallelism 确立了 illustrations 是 visual element；morphological analysis 揭示了 'making visible' 的核心含义；domain knowledge 明确了在 packaging context 中的具体所指。结论清晰：illustrations 指的是包装上的图案、图像。

    同心圆收窄法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

  • 引语运用

    P2 P3 P4

    文章通过 court 的 ruling 和 judgment 来 establish authority，第三段用了 Switzerland's highest court agreed 和 overturned a ruling，还有 ordered 和 suggested 这些 verbs 来传达 legal decisions。这种 indirect quotation 的方式让 news report 显得更 objective 和 credible，因为它是在 relay official statements 而不是 journalist's opinion。这对 main idea 的作用是通过 authoritative source 来 support 整个 legal outcome 的 legitimacy。

    信号词 argued agreed said stated confirmed ruled ordered suggested claimed announced declared

    仿写： 在写 news report 时，当你需要 convey important decisions 或 controversial points，可以采用 indirect quotation 的形式。比如用 "authorities stated that..."、"the court ruled that..." 或 "officials confirmed that..." 这样的 structures。模版可以是：【Authority/Institution】+ 【reporting verb (stated/ruled/confirmed/argued)】+ 【that-clause containing the key information】。这样能让你的 reporting 更 professional 和 trustworthy。

  • 对比手法

    P4

    第四段通过 detailed comparison 来 illustrate the similarity 和 difference between two products。文章用 "The Swiss manufacturer's rabbit has a red bow and bell, while the German supermarket's has a green bow and bell" 这样的 contrasting structure，还有 "The colour of the wrapper is similar, as are the illustrations"。这种 contrast 对 main idea 的作用是 justify 为什么 court 会 rule in favor of the Swiss company，即使 there are differences，但 overall similarity 仍然可能 cause consumer confusion。这让 legal decision 看起来更 reasonable 和 well-grounded。

    信号词 while whereas but however in contrast on the other hand similarly likewise as are compared to unlike

    仿写： 当你需要 explain why a decision was made 或 compare two similar things 时，可以用 "A has X, while B has Y" 或 "X is similar, as is Y" 这样的 parallel structures。建议的模版是：【Item A】+ 【feature description】+ 【while/whereas】+ 【Item B】+ 【contrasting/similar feature】。然后可以加一句 summary statement 用 "similar" 或 "different" 来 reinforce the comparison。这样能让你的 analysis 更 systematic 和 convincing。

  • 背景交代

    P5

    第五段提供 historical context，用 "The chocolate company has been to court before" 和 "Last year, a German federal court said..." 来 establish a pattern of legal protection。这个 background information 对 main idea 的作用是 contextualize 当前的 case，显示这不是 isolated incident，而是 Swiss company 的 ongoing effort to protect its intellectual property。这让 readers understand 这个 dispute 的 broader significance 和 company's determination。

    信号词 before previously last year earlier in the past historically has been had been prior to formerly

    仿写： 当你写到某个 current event 时，如果它有 relevant history，可以用 "X has been... before" 或 "Last year/Previously, ..." 来 introduce that background。建议的模版是：【Entity】+ 【has/had + past action】+ 【before/previously】+ 【specific example with time marker】。这能让你的 report 更 comprehensive，显示你 did thorough research 而不只是 covering surface-level news。

  • 客观描述

    P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

    整篇文章用 neutral language 和 factual statements 来 present the case，比如第一段的 "has been ordered to destroy" 和第三段的 "overturned a ruling"，都是 objective descriptions of what happened。文章避免了 emotional language 或 value judgments，只是 reporting the facts and court decisions。这种 objectivity 对 main idea 很关键，因为它让 news report maintain credibility，让 readers 能 form their own opinions without being influenced by journalist's bias。

    仿写： 在写 news reports 时，consistently use passive voice 或 neutral verbs 来 describe actions，比如 "was ordered"、"has been ruled"、"were destroyed" 而不是 "cruelly forced to" 或 "unfairly judged"。模版是：【Subject】+ 【neutral verb (ordered/ruled/decided/stated)】+ 【factual outcome】。Avoid adjectives that carry emotional weight 比如 "shocking"、"unfair"、"brilliant"。Let the facts 和 official statements do the talking。

  • 数据引用

    P2 P4 P5

    虽然这篇文章没有 numerical statistics，但它引用了 specific factual details 比如 "gold-wrapped"、"red bow and bell" vs "green bow and bell"、"shade of the gold wrapping" 这些 concrete specifications。这些 precise details function like data，providing verifiable evidence to support the legal arguments。对 main idea 的作用是让 court's reasoning 更 tangible and convincing，readers 能 visualize exactly what aspects 导致了 copyright infringement ruling。

    信号词 specific exactly precisely measured recorded documented particular detailed concrete

    仿写： 当你 report on disputes 或 decisions，include specific details that were part of the evaluation。用 "specific color"、"exact dimensions"、"particular features" 这样的 concrete nouns 而不是 vague descriptions。模版可以是：【General statement】+ 【specific detail (color/size/number/date)】+ 【how it relates to the issue】。比如不说 "the products look similar"，而说 "both products feature gold wrapping and animal shapes with accessories"。Specificity builds credibility。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

4 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 司法逆转暗示初审判决存在瑕疵

    P3
    overturned a ruling last year by the country's commercial court that had sided with the supermarket

    转折类 overturned reversed overruled struck down rejected dismissed contradicted

    虽然文章 neutrally reports 说最高法院 overturned 了商业法院的 ruling,但这个 reversal 本身就 implicitly suggests 商业法院去年的判决可能在 legal reasoning 或 copyright law application 上存在 errors。这对 article's main point 的作用是 strengthen 瑞士制造商的 legal position,暗示他们的 copyright claim 确实 has merit,而不是 frivolous litigation。这个 implied meaning 增强了 final ruling 的 legitimacy 和 inevitability,让读者 understand 这不是 arbitrary decision,而是 higher authority 的 necessary correction。

  • 委婉建议掩盖的强制性质

    P3
    but suggested the chocolate needn't be wasted. It could be melted for use in other products

    委婉表达 suggested recommended advised proposed indicated hinted implied

    Court 用 suggested 而不是 commanded 来描述巧克力的 disposal method,表面上给超市 flexibility,但实际上这是一种 judicial courtesy 下的 implicit directive。这个 implied meaning 对文章的 function 是 soften 这个严厉 ruling 的 harsh edges,显示法院不是 unreasonably punitive。它暗示法院 balanced 了 copyright protection 和 practical waste reduction,展现了 judicial wisdom。这让整个 ruling 显得更 reasonable 和 thoughtful,而不仅仅是 rigid enforcement,对 article's portrayal of balanced justice 有 positive contribution。

  • 让步转折凸显实质性相似

    P4
    even though there are some differences between the two products, there was still the possibility of confusion

    让步类 even though although despite while whereas granted that admittedly

    Court 用 even though 来 acknowledge 两个 products 之间的 differences,但立即转向 confusion 的 possibility,这 implicitly conveys 那些 differences(不同颜色的 bow and bell)是 insufficient to distinguish 这两个 products。言外之意是:表面的 minor variations 不能 mask 整体的 substantial similarity。这对 main point 的作用是 justify 为什么 court ruled in favor of 瑞士制造商—尽管有 visible differences,核心的 confusing elements(包装颜色、features illustration)才是 determinative。这个 implied logic strengthens 整个 copyright infringement 判决的 reasonableness,让读者 understand 这不是 overly strict interpretation,而是 focused on consumer protection。

  • 重复诉讼暗示侵权常态化

    P5
    The chocolate company has been to court before to protect its popular chocolate treat

    时间对比类 before previously again repeatedly once more yet another not the first time

    文章 mentions 这家巧克力公司 has been to court before,这 implicitly suggests 对其产品的 copycat attempts 是 recurring problem,不是 isolated case。言外之意有两层:一是该公司的 product 确实很 popular and valuable(值得被 copied),二是市场上存在 systematic problem of imitation。这对 article's main narrative 的作用是 contextualize 当前 ruling 不是 overreaction,而是 company's necessary ongoing effort to protect 其 intellectual property。同时也 imply 这类 packaging disputes 在 chocolate industry 中可能很 common,增强了报道的 broader relevance beyond this single case。这个 historical reference 让读者 understand 这是 long-term brand protection battle 的一部分。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度：客观中立

结论先行：本文作者态度为客观中立（ Objective and Factual）。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 识别文章体裁 P1

    News report 的 genre convention 要求 journalist 保持 neutral stance，只 present facts 不 express opinions，所以一旦识别出 article type，就能预判 author's attitude 是 objective。

  2. 句式结构分析 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

    Passive constructions 能让 writer 隐藏自己的 stance，只 report actions 而不 assign blame。Attribution verbs（argued, agreed, said）表明 author 在 quote sources 而非 give own opinions，这是 objectivity 的 key indicator。

  3. 词汇情感色彩 P2 P4 P5

    Objective reporting 要求 writer 使用 neutral vocabulary，避免 words with connotations。如果文中充斥 value judgments 或 emotive terms，则说明 author 在 inject personal views；反之则证明 maintaining objectivity。

  4. 多方观点平衡 P2 P3 P4

    Balanced presentation 是 journalistic objectivity 的 hallmark。如果 article 只 quote one party 或 give disproportionate space to one viewpoint，说明 author 有 bias；若 fairly represent all sides，则显示 neutral attitude。

  5. 多维度证据汇总 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

    当所有 linguistic and structural features 都 point to objectivity 时，我们能 confidently conclude author 的 stance。这不是 single piece of evidence，而是 multiple layers of proof 共同 support 这个 judgment。

文中的态度信号词

  • has been ordered P1

    这个 passive construction 表明 author 在 report legal action 而不是 give his own opinion，通过 removing agent（谁下的命令）来 maintain distance from the event，这是 objective reporting 的 典型 marker。

    同类词 was required was directed was instructed was mandated was ruled

  • had argued P2

    这个 reporting verb 显示 author 在 attribute statement to source（Swiss firm），而不是 present it as his own view。Past perfect tense 强调这是 reported speech，further distancing author from the content。

    同类词 claimed stated contended maintained asserted

  • agreed P3

    这个 verb 客观 report court's decision，没有添加 author's commentary on whether the decision 是 right or wrong。简洁的 factual statement 体现了 journalistic neutrality。

    同类词 ruled decided determined concluded found

  • similar P2

    这个 descriptive adjective 是 factual comparison，没有 emotional loading。'Similar' 是 neutral descriptor，不像 'copycat' 或 'imitation' 那样 carry negative connotations，显示 author 在 avoid judgmental language。

    同类词 comparable alike analogous corresponding matching

  • possibility of confusion P4

    这个 phrase 表达 legal concern 时使用了 tentative language（possibility），而非 assertive statement（'will confuse', 'definitely misleads'），showing author 在 report court's reasoning without overstating the case。

    同类词 potential for misunderstanding risk of mix-up chance of mistaking likelihood of error

  • even though P4

    这个 concessive conjunction 显示 author 在 present contrasting information objectively，acknowledging differences 的同时 reporting court's conclusion，体现了 balanced presentation 而非 one-sided argument。

    同类词 although despite while whereas however

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇新闻报道

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例，可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇新闻报道？

  1. 首段呈现具体事件 P1

    新闻报道的 first paragraph 必须包含 concrete event，而议论文会先提出 a debatable claim，说明文则会先介绍 a concept 或 phenomenon。这篇文章开头就是 specific legal case，是典型的 news lead。

  2. 事实层层递进 P2 P3

    第二段提供了 Swiss firm's argument，第三段给出 court's decision 和 specific order。这种 layered information delivery 是新闻报道的特征，而议论文会用 these paragraphs 来 develop arguments，说明文会用来 explain mechanisms。

  3. 引述外部信源 P2 P3 P4

    文中多次出现 the Swiss firm argued、the court agreed、it said 这类 attribution phrases，表明作者在 reporting external sources 而非 expressing personal views。议论文会有 I believe 或 we should，说明文会有 impersonal explanations。

  4. 追溯事件脉络 P5

    第五段提到 the company has been to court before 和 last year 的 federal court ruling，这种 contextual background 是新闻特有的。议论文不会关注 chronological development，说明文也不需要 historical context。

  5. 四维特征综判 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

    新闻报道的本质是 factual account of recent events，与议论文的 persuasive argument 和说明文的 informative explanation 有本质区别。这篇文章没有 thesis statement，没有 cause-effect explanation，只有 what happened and what was said。

哪些词暴露了新闻报道体裁？

  • has been ordered to P1 核心事实概括词 lost a court battle had argued agreed and overturned ordered that said
  • A German supermarket P1 即时性时间与地点词 Swiss chocolate manufacturer The Swiss firm Switzerland's highest court the country's commercial court Last year
  • court battle P1 核心事实概括词 copyright protection ruling commercial court highest court federal court
  • had argued P2 新闻来源与引用词 agreed said suggested
  • Last year P3 即时性时间与地点词 last year
  • overturned a ruling P3 核心事实概括词 ordered that be destroyed could be melted sided with was also protected
  • It said P4 新闻来源与引用词 The Swiss firm had argued agreed suggested
  • even though there are some differences P4 核心事实概括词 there was still the possibility The colour of the wrapper is similar as are the illustrations
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

5 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 的常见问题

2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章的主旨是什么？
瑞士最高法院裁定一家德国超市的巧克力兔子侵犯了瑞士制造商的版权，因可能造成消费者混淆，尽管蝴蝶结颜色有差异，法院下令销毁这些兔子，但建议可将巧克力融化再利用。（英文表述：A German supermarket must destroy its chocolate rabbits after Switzerland's highest court ruled they infringed on a Swiss manufacturer's copyright, citing potential consumer confusion despite differences in bow colors, and ordered the chocolate be melted for reuse.）
2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章是什么体裁？难度如何？
体裁为新闻报道，作者立场是客观中立（Objective and Factual）。CEFR 难度 B2，全文 174 词、5 段；在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中，B2 级共 234 篇（占 46%）。
2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的？
全文 5 段按新闻报道骨架分为 5 个意群：第1段——核心事件导语；第2段——诉讼理由阐述；第3段——法院裁决详情；第4段——判决依据论证；第5段——历史背景补充。
2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章的作者态度是什么？
作者态度是客观中立（Objective and Factual）。判断路径：识别文章体裁 → 句式结构分析 → 词汇情感色彩 → 多方观点平衡 → 多维度证据汇总；文中的态度信号词包括 has been ordered（第1段）、had argued（第2段）、agreed（第3段）、similar（第2段）、possibility of confusion（第4段）、even though（第4段）。
2025年12月英语四级真题第1套 Part II Section A (3) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词？
按文中出现顺序共 3 个：overturn（推翻、撤销（判决或决定））、imitation（仿制品、模仿品）、illustration（图案、图解、插图），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新：