英语四级 2021年6月·第2套 Part III Section C (1) 阅读理解(四选一)试卷排版
英语四级2021年6月·第2套 Part III Section C (1) 阅读理解(四选一):共 5 题、占整卷 20%(710 分制折算约 142 分)、卷面选文共 340 个英文单词。本页按真题原卷版式还原该模块卷面(不含解析);逐题解析在「题目解析」页,全文逐句精读在「原文精读」页;本模块真题可免费下载 PDF/Word,入口见上方本题行。
试卷原卷
真题卷第2套(2021-06) • 四级
Part III Section C (1)
Directions:There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A), B), C) and D). You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.
Passage One
Questions 46 to 50 are based on the following passage.
Sugar shocked. That describes the reaction of many Americans this week following revelations that, 50 years ago, the sugar industry paid Harvard scientists for research that shifted the focus away from sugar's role in heart disease—and put the spotlight(注意的中心) squarely on dietary fat.
What might surprise consumers is just how many present-day nutrition studies are still funded by the food industry. Nutrition scholar Marion Nestle of New York University spent a year informally tracking industry-funded studies on food. "Roughly 90% of nearly 170 studies favored the sponsor's interest," Nestle tells us. Other systematic reviews support her conclusions.
For instance, studies funded by Welch Foods—the brand behind Welch's 100% Grape Juice—found that drinking Concord grape juice daily may boost brain function. Another, funded by Quaker Oats, concluded, as a Daily Mail story put it, that "hot oatmeal(燕麦粥) breakfast keeps you full for longer."
Last year, The New York Times revealed how Coca-Cola was funding well-known scientists and organizations promoting a message that, in the battle against weight gain, people should pay more attention to exercise and less to what they eat and drink. Coca-Cola also released data detailing its funding of several medical institutions and associations between 2010 and 2015.
"It's certainly a problem that so much research in nutrition and health is funded by industry," says Bonnie Liebman, director of nutrition at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "When the food industry pays for research, it often gets what it pays for." And what it pays for is often a pro-industry finding.
Given this environment, consumers should be skeptical(怀疑的) when reading the latest finding in nutrition science and ignore the latest study that pops up on your news feed. "Rely on health experts who've reviewed all the evidence," Liebman says, pointing to the official government Dietary Guidelines, which are based on reviews of hundreds of studies.
"And that expert advice remains pretty simple," says Nestle. "We know what healthy diets are—lots of vegetables, not too much junk food, balanced calories. Everything else is really difficult to do experimentally."
46.
What did Harvard scientists do 50 years ago?
A)They raised public awareness of the possible causes of heart disease.
B)They turned public attention away from the health risks of sugar to fat.
C)They placed the sugar industry in the spotlight with their new findings.
D)They conducted large-scale research on the role of sugar in people's health.
47.
What does Marion Nestle say about present-day nutrition studies?
A)They took her a full year to track and analyze.
B)Most of them are based on systematic reviews.
C)They depend on funding from the food industries.
D)Nearly all of them serve the purpose of the funders.
48.
What did Coca-Cola-funded studies claim?
A)Exercise is more important to good health than diet.
B)Choosing what to eat and drink is key to weight control.
C)Drinking Coca-Cola does not contribute to weight gain.
D)The food industry plays a major role in fighting obesity.
49.
What does Liebman say about industry-funded research?
A)It simply focuses on nutrition and health.
B)It causes confusion among consumers.
C)It rarely results in objective findings.
D)It runs counter to the public interest.
50.
What is the author's advice to consumers?
A)Follow their intuition in deciding what to eat.
B)Be doubtful of diet experts' recommendations.
C)Ignore irrelevant information on their news feed.
D)Think twice about new nutrition research findings.
选文出处:本文选自2016年9月14日发表在 www.npr.org(美国国家公共电台官网)上一篇标题为“Sugar Shocked? The Rest Of Food Industry Pays For Lots Of Research,Too”(《糖震惊?其他食品行业也在为大量研究买单》)的文章。