2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 · Part II Section A (2) · 听力

2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 245 词、11 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语六级文章中占 39%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

11 段英文原文

以下为2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 11 段。左侧 P1–P11 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

M: Can we make you an offer? We would like to run the campaign for four extra weeks.

W: Well, can we summarise the problem from my point of view? First of all, the campaign was late. It missed two important trade fairs. The ads also did not appear in two key magazines. As a result, the campaign failed. Do you accept that summary of what happened?

M: Well, the delay wasn't entirely our fault. You did in fact make late changes to the specifications of the advertisements.

W: Um, actually, you were late with the initial proposals so you have very little time and in fact, we only asked for small changes.

M: Well, whatever. Can we repeat our offer to run the campaign for four extra weeks?

W: That's not really the point. The campaign missed two key trade fairs. Because of this, we are asking you either to repeat the campaign next year for free, or we only pay 50% of the fee for this year.

M: Could we suggest a 20% reduction to the fee together with the four weeks' extension to the campaign?

W: We are not happy. We lost business.

M: I think we both made mistakes. The responsibility is on both sides.

W: OK, let's suggest a new solution. How about a 40% cut in fee, or a free repeat campaign?

M: Well, let's take a break. We're not getting very far. Perhaps we should think about this.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

11 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 机构提出延期补偿方案

    这是 negotiation 的 opening move,男方代表 agency 直接抛出 offer,提议 extend the campaign for four extra weeks 作为补救 measure,体现出 proactive 但略显 simplistic 的 compensation strategy。

    这个 opening offer 启动了整个 negotiation process,为后续的 back-and-forth debate 设定了 baseline,同时也 reveals agency 对问题 severity 的初步 assessment 可能不够充分。

    提出首轮补偿方案
  2. 客户详述问题并质询责任

    女方代表 client 系统地 enumerates 三个 specific failures (late campaign, missed trade fairs, absent magazine ads),用 rhetorical question "Do you accept that summary?" 来 establish accountability,展现 structured argumentation 和 assertive negotiation stance。

    这个 detailed problem statement 是 negotiation 的 critical foundation,它 defines the scope of dispute,establishes client's grievances with factual evidence,并 challenges agency 去 acknowledge responsibility,为后续 compensation demands 提供 logical basis。

    列举失误索要认责
  3. 机构辩解推卸部分责任

    Agency 用 hedging language ("wasn't entirely our fault") 进行 defensive response,通过 pointing out client's late specification changes 来 shift partial blame,体现 typical negotiation tactic of redistributing responsibility。

    这个 defense mechanism 是 negotiation dynamic 的 turning point,它 complicates the simple client-agency blame narrative,introduces shared responsibility concept,为 agency 后续的 compromise offers 提供 justification,同时也 escalates 谈判的 adversarial tone。

    辩称客户负有责任
  4. 客户反驳责任推诿

    Client 用 factual correction ("actually, you were late with initial proposals") 来 dismantle agency's excuse,并 minimizes 自己的 changes ("only asked for small changes"),展现 point-by-point rebuttal strategy in adversarial negotiation。

    这个 counter-rebuttal strengthens client's position by establishing causal chain (agency's initial delay → time pressure → small changes),它 neutralizes agency's defense attempt,maintains pressure on agency to accept full responsibility,推动 negotiation 向 client-favorable resolution 方向发展。

    驳斥对方辩解理由
  5. 机构回避争论重申方案

    Agency 用 dismissive "whatever" 来 terminate 责任 debate,用 "repeat our offer" 试图 redirect conversation back to solution-focused track,体现 negotiation strategy of avoiding prolonged dispute over past mistakes。

    这个 strategic pivot 是 negotiation tactics 的体现,agency 意识到 responsibility debate 对自己不利,通过 restating original offer 试图 control negotiation agenda,但这个 abrupt topic shift 也 signals agency's weakness in factual argument。

    绕过责任直接重提补偿
  6. 客户拒绝并提出严厉要求

    Client 用 "That's not really the point" 直接 dismisses agency's offer,re-emphasizes key damage (missed trade fairs),然后 presents ultimatum with two options (free repeat OR 50% fee reduction),显著 escalates demands beyond agency's offer。

    这是 negotiation 的 critical juncture,client 从 discussing responsibility 转向 concrete demands,用 either-or structure 展现 firm stance,这个 significant demand escalation 是 hardball negotiation tactic,forces agency 到 decision point,推动 dialogue 向 resolution stage 前进。

    提出二选一补偿底线
  7. 机构提出折中对案

    Agency 用 "Could we suggest" 的 tentative language 提出 compromise package (20% reduction + four-week extension),这个 counter-proposal 试图 meet client halfway,combining 两个 concessions to make offer more appealing。

    这个 counter-offer 展现 typical bargaining behavior (splitting the difference),agency 从 initial simple extension 升级到 combined package with financial concession,显示 negotiation progress,但 gap 仍然 substantial (20% vs. 50% 或 free repeat),预示 further haggling 的必要性。

    提出综合性让步方案
  8. 客户表达不满和损失

    Client 用 minimalist language ("We are not happy. We lost business.") 来 convey strong dissatisfaction,这个 terse, emotionally-charged statement 是 implicit rejection of agency's counteroffer,用 factual claim (lost business) 强化 severity of damage。

    这个 emotional interjection breaks typical proposal-counteroffer pattern,它 signals client's frustration with perceived insufficient offers,用 concrete consequence (lost business) 来 justify demanding stance,increases pressure on agency,但 brevity 也 leaves room for continued negotiation。

    强调实际业务损失
  9. 机构提出责任共担观点

    Agency 用 conciliatory tone ("I think we both made mistakes") 来 reframe dispute as shared responsibility,这个 balanced perspective 试图 de-escalate tension,为 compromise 创造 psychological basis,是 strategic retreat from earlier defensive stance。

    这个 conciliatory statement 是 negotiation repair attempt,agency 意识到 hard bargaining 陷入 stalemate,用 shared-blame framing 来 soften confrontational atmosphere,为 finding middle ground 铺路,但 client's subsequent response 显示这个 diplomatic move 效果有限。

    提出双方均担责
  10. 客户修改方案再施压

    Client 用 "OK, let's suggest a new solution" 表面接受 collaborative tone,但实际提出 更严厉的 terms (40% cut OR free repeat),compared to earlier 50% or free repeat,这个 apparent compromise 实际是 repositioning their ultimatum。

    这个 "new solution" 是 sophisticated negotiation move,client 用 collaborative framing ("let's suggest") 来 soften presentation,但 40% 和 free repeat 选项 still heavily favor client,这个 slight moderation (40% vs. 50%) 是 strategic concession 来 appear reasonable 而不真正 yield ground。

    调整补偿方案维持高压
  11. 机构提议休会重新考虑

    Agency 用 "let's take a break" 和 "We're not getting very far" 来 explicitly acknowledge impasse,propose temporary suspension ("think about this"),这是 procedural move to prevent further unproductive exchange,为 future resolution 保留 space。

    这个 process intervention 是 negotiation 的 realistic ending when parties 无法 immediate agreement。它 acknowledges deadlock without burning bridges ("Perhaps we should think"),maintains professional tone,暗示 negotiation 将在 more prepared state 下 continue,为 dialogue 提供 graceful exit without resolution。

    承认僵局请求暂停
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首轮对话的动作词冲突 P1 P2

    对话类文章的 main topic 往往在开头几轮就会 reveal,特别是当一方 make an offer 而另一方 raise concerns 时,这种 opening conflict 就是 topic indicator

  2. 投诉方与辩护方的角色分布 P2 P3 P4 P6 P8

    对话中的 power dynamics 和 role positioning 能快速揭示 conversation type。当一方持续 list problems 而另一方 counter with explanations 或 offers 时,这是 typical negotiation pattern

  3. 提议与反提议的循环升级 P1 P5 P7 P10 P11

    Negotiation 的核心特征是 iterative proposal exchange。如果对话中出现 multiple rounds of offers 和 rejections,且 terms keep changing,说明这是 active bargaining process

  4. 问题类型加角色关系加进展困难 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11

    对话类文章的 gist 由三个 dimensions 构成:what's being discussed (issue)、who's taking what stance (roles)、how it's progressing (outcome)。这三个 elements combined 就能 form complete main idea

主旨信号词 failed P2 offer P1 not really the point P6 responsibility P9 let's take a break P11

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

客户与广告代理公司就一次失败的广告活动进行谈判。客户因错过截止日期和贸易展会而寻求赔偿,而代理公司提供延期方案。双方就责任归属展开辩论,并在降低费用或重做活动方面难以达成一致。
A negotiation between a client and agency over a failed advertising campaign. The client seeks compensation for missed deadlines and trade fairs, while the agency offers extensions. Both parties debate responsibility and struggle to reach agreement on reduced fees or campaign repetition.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • summarise 总结;概括

    让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,从 contextual behavior 看,speaker 说完 'can we summarise' 后立即 list 了多个 scattered problems,说明这个 action 是把 fragmented information 进行 organized consolidation。其次,从 morphology 角度,summary + -ise 的 structure 直接告诉我们这是'执行 summary 动作'。最后,同一 paragraph 中 summary 这个 noun 的 appearance 形成 lexical reinforcement。三条 evidence 共同指向一个 conclusion:这个 verb 的 core meaning 是'将零散信息整理成概要'。

    行为序列+构词拆解+词族追踪
  • specification 规格说明;技术要求;具体要求

    我们来 synthesize 这些 evidence。第一,从 syntactic context 看,'specifications of the advertisements' 这个 structure 表明它是 advertisements 所附带的某种 detailed content。第二,morphological breakdown 显示 specific + -ation 指向'使事物变具体的结果',即'详细说明'。第三,从 argumentative context 看,双方 dispute 的焦点是对这些 specifications 的 changes 是否 significant,这 confirms 它是可以被 adjusted 的 detailed requirements。综合以上 clues,可以 conclude 这个 word 指的是'具体详细的规格说明或技术要求'。

    句法定位+词根重构+争论追踪
  • extension 延长;延期;延长的期限

    让我们 integrate 这些 findings。首先,通过 parallel expressions,'four extra weeks' 和 'four weeks' extension' 的 structural equivalence 直接 reveal extension 与'additional time' 的 semantic connection。其次,morphological analysis 显示 extend + -sion 的 composition 明确指向'延长的动作或结果'。最后,从 negotiation dynamics 看,extension 作为 repeated compensation offer 且与 specific time duration 绑定,这 solidifies 其'时间延长'的 meaning。三个 angles 的 evidence 完全 converge。

    等价改写+词根确认+谈判功能
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

4 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 反问

    P2

    女方在 第2段 用了一个 rhetorical question:"Do you accept that summary of what happened?",这不是真的在 seeking confirmation,而是通过 questioning 的 form 来 emphasize 她对 facts 的 presentation,forcing 对方 acknowledge 这些 problems。这种 rhetorical strategy 在 negotiation context 里非常 powerful,因为它把 blame 和 responsibility 直接 push 到对方面前,让对方 difficult to deny 或者 dodge the issue。

    信号词 Do you accept Don't you think Wouldn't you agree Can you deny Isn't it true that Don't you see How can you say

    仿写: 当你想在 negotiation 或者 argument 里 establish your position 时,可以先 list facts 或者 problems,然后用 rhetorical question 作为 closing。Pattern 是:"[陈述问题] + Do you accept/agree/acknowledge that...?" 或者 "Don't you think that...?"。这样既 present 了 evidence,又通过 questioning 让对方 feel obligated to respond,increasing 你的 persuasive power。

  • 重复

    P1 P5 P7

    男方在 第1段、第5段、第7段 三次 mention 了 campaign extension 的 offer("four extra weeks" 和 "four weeks' extension")。这种 repetition strategy 在 negotiation 里体现了男方的 insistence 和他认为这是 reasonable solution 的 stance。通过 repeated mentioning,他试图 anchor 这个 proposal 在整个 discussion 中,making it seem like a legitimate compromise,但从 dialogue flow 可以看出女方 consistently rejects 这个方案,说明 repetition 并不总能 achieve persuasion。

    信号词 four extra weeks extension repeat the campaign run the campaign our offer

    仿写: 当你想在 discussion 里 promote 某个 solution 或 idea 时,可以在 different stages of conversation 里 bring it back,但要 vary the wording slightly 避免 sound too mechanical。Pattern 可以是:first mention as suggestion,later repeat as modified offer,最后 reframe 为 compromise。比如 "How about X?" → "We could still do X" → "Let's consider X as part of the solution"。但要注意对方的 receptiveness,excessive repetition 可能 backfire。

  • 语气词

    P2 P3 P4 P5 P10 P11

    对话中 multiple 地方用了 discourse markers:"Well"(第2段, 第3段, 第5段, 第11段)、"Um, actually"(第4段)、"OK"(第10段)。这些 markers 在 negotiation context 里非常 functional:"Well" 常在 disagreement 或 shift position 前出现,softening the blow;"Um, actually" 表示 correction 或 counter-argument;"OK" 显示 concession 或 willingness to compromise。这些 subtle linguistic elements 反映了 speakers 的 emotional states 和 strategic positioning,making the dialogue sound more authentic 和 revealing power dynamics。

    信号词 Well Um Actually OK You know I mean Look Right So

    仿写: 在写 dialogue 时,strategic use of discourse markers 能 make conversation feel more natural 和 realistic。Use "well" before disagreements 或 qualifications;use "actually" when correcting 对方;use "OK" 或 "alright" when showing willingness to move forward。Pattern:"Well, [表示转折的内容]"、"Um/Actually, [提出不同观点]"、"OK, [提出新建议]"。但要 moderate use,overuse 会让 dialogue seem hesitant 或 unprofessional。

  • 省略

    P5 P8

    第5段 的 "Well, whatever" 是典型的 elliptical expression,完整 form 应该是 "Well, whatever the reason was" 或 "whatever happened"。这个 ellipsis 在这里非常 revealing:男方用 abbreviated form 来 dismiss 前面关于 responsibility 的 debate,avoiding detailed engagement with 女方的 accusation。这种 linguistic economy 既 saves face 又 redirects conversation,是 strategic avoidance 的 manifestation。类似的还有 第8段 "We lost business",省略了 "because of your mistakes" 这样的 explicit attribution。

    信号词 whatever anyway regardless never mind in any case

    仿写: 在 negotiation 或 sensitive discussions 里,strategic ellipsis 可以 help you dodge direct blame 或 maintain diplomatic tone。当你想 move past contentious point 时,可以用 "Whatever [happened/the reason]" 来 acknowledge but dismiss;当你想 imply causation without explicit accusation,可以省略 causal connectors,just state the consequence。但要确保 context makes the omitted part clear,否则 miscommunication 会发生。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

10 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 用总结问题表达不满和追责

    P2
    can we summarise the problem from my point of view? First of all, the campaign was late... Do you accept that summary of what happened?

    视角限定语 from my point of view in my opinion from where I stand as I see it from my perspective the way I see it in my view

    女方并非在 objectively summarize 客观总结,而是用 from my point of view 这个 hedging device 缓冲装置来 package 包装一个 one-sided blame narrative 单方面指责叙事。接下来的 First of all 和 As a result 构建了 causal chain 因果链,最后的 Do you accept 看似 seeking agreement 寻求认同,实则是 cornering 逼迫对方 acknowledge responsibility 承认责任。这个 言外之意 implication 为后续的 compensation demand 赔偿要求做 groundwork 铺垫,是 negotiation strategy 谈判策略的 opening move 开局动作

  • 用模糊表达回避责任

    P3
    Well, the delay wasn't entirely our fault. You did in fact make late changes to the specifications

    模糊限制语 wasn't entirely not completely partly to some extent somewhat not fully not necessarily

    男方用 wasn't entirely 这个 hedging device 对冲工具来 soften admission 软化承认,避免 full accountability 完全问责。紧接着的 You did in fact 构成 counter-narrative 反叙事,试图 redistribute blame 重新分配责任。这个 implication 言外之意显示男方处于 defensive position 防守位置,通过 linguistic maneuvering 语言操纵来 maintain negotiation ground 维持谈判阵地,但这种 evasiveness 闪避态度反而 weaken 削弱了自己的 credibility 可信度

  • 用事实反驳回击对方逻辑

    P4
    Um, actually, you were late with the initial proposals so you have very little time and in fact, we only asked for small changes

    事实强调词 actually in fact in reality the truth is as a matter of fact to be honest frankly

    女方用 actually 这个 corrective marker 纠正标记来 dispute 争辩男方的 blame-sharing attempt 分担责任尝试。Um 表示 calculated hesitation 有计算的犹豫,actually 引出 timeline reversal 时间线逆转(你们先延误),in fact 进一步 minimize 最小化己方的 modifications 修改程度(only small changes)。这个 implication 言外之意是在 re-establish 重新确立 primary fault 主要过错在对方,为后续的 aggressive compensation demand 强硬赔偿要求 strengthen justification 加强正当性

  • 用轻描淡写跳过争议焦点

    P5
    Well, whatever. Can we repeat our offer to run the campaign for four extra weeks?

    话题切换词 whatever anyway in any case regardless moving on let's not dwell on be that as it may

    男方用 whatever 这个 dismissive marker 轻蔑标记来 abort 中止 causality debate 因果辩论,因为 timeline argument 时间线论证对己方 unfavorable 不利。Can we repeat 表面是 politely asking 礼貌询问,实则是 stubbornly insisting 固执坚持 on original offer 原方案。这个 implication 言外之意显示男方 recognize 意识到在 fault attribution 过错归属上 losing ground 失去阵地,于是 strategically retreat 策略性撤退到 solution-focused stance 解决方案导向立场,但这种 evasiveness 闪避反而 signal weakness 暗示弱势

  • 用否定焦点拒绝对方方案

    P6
    That's not really the point. The campaign missed two key trade fairs. Because of this, we are asking you either to repeat the campaign next year for free, or we only pay 50% of the fee

    焦点否定语 not really the point that's beside the point missing the point the real issue is what matters is the key question is the core problem is

    女方用 not really the point 这个 dismissive phrase 轻蔑短语来 invalidate 使无效男方的 extension offer 延期提议,表明 four extra weeks 四周延期 cannot compensate 无法补偿 for structural damage 结构性损失(missed trade fairs)。either...or 的 binary choice 二元选择是 escalation tactic 升级策略,从 discussion 讨论转向 ultimatum 最后通牒。这个 implication 言外之意显示女方 shift to aggressive posture 转向强硬姿态,用 take-it-or-leave-it approach 要么接受要么拉倒的方式来 pressure 施压对方 accept substantial compensation 接受实质性赔偿

  • 用试探性提议测试底线

    P7
    Could we suggest a 20% reduction to the fee together with the four weeks' extension to the campaign?

    委婉情态词 Could we suggest Would you consider Might we propose Perhaps we could What if we How about we Would it be possible

    男方用 Could we suggest 这个 polite modal 礼貌情态词来 soften 软化一个 substantially lower offer 实质性更低提议(20% reduction + extension vs 50% or free)。这个 implication 言外之意是男方 acknowledge 承认需要 make concession 做让步,但 resist 抵制女方的 anchor point 锚点,试图 pull negotiation 拉动谈判 toward middle ground 向中间地带。however 然而这个 gap 差距过大(20% vs 50%),暗示 parties remain far apart 双方仍相距甚远

  • 用情绪宣泄表达谈判破裂风险

    P8
    We are not happy. We lost business.

    情绪表达句 We are not happy. We lost business. We are not happy We are disappointed This is unacceptable We lost business We suffered losses We are frustrated

    女方用 not happy 和 lost business 这两个 blunt statements 直白陈述来 reject 拒绝男方的 20% offer,表明 gap remains unacceptable 差距仍不可接受。短促的 sentence structure 句子结构 without softening devices 没有软化装置 signal 标志 hardening position 立场强硬化。这个 implication 言外之意是女方 escalate emotional pressure 升级情感压力,warn 警告如果 substantial movement 实质性让步 not forthcoming 不出现,negotiation may collapse 谈判可能崩溃,这是 brinkmanship tactic 边缘策略

  • 用责任均摊缓和对抗

    P9
    I think we both made mistakes. The responsibility is on both sides.

    对等分配词 both mutual shared on both sides we all neither side everyone

    男方用 both made mistakes 和 both sides 来 create moral equivalence 制造道德对等,试图 move away from 脱离 fault attribution 过错归属 toward shared responsibility 共担责任框架。这个 implication 言外之意有 dual interpretation 双重解读:一方面是 genuine attempt 真诚尝试 to find common ground 寻找共同点,de-escalate 降级 from brinkmanship 边缘策略;另一方面可能被女方 perceive as 感知为 continued evasion 持续逃避,因为 original causality dispute 原因果争议 remains unresolved 仍未解决

  • 用妥协式提议试探和解空间

    P10
    OK, let's suggest a new solution. How about a 40% cut in fee, or a free repeat campaign?

    协作信号词 let's suggest a new solution how about we let's try what if we both perhaps we can let's work together shall we explore

    女方用 let's suggest a new solution 这个 collaborative framing 协作性框定来 soften 软化 what is essentially 本质上是 the same demand 相同要求(从50%降到40%,但保留 free repeat 免费重做选项)。OK 表示 acknowledge 承认男方的 both sides 双方责任说法,但 new solution 仍然 heavily weighted 严重倾斜 toward client's favor 客户方利益。这个 implication 言外之意是 limited flexibility 有限灵活性:女方 willing to negotiate 愿意协商 within narrow band 在狭窄范围内,但 not willing to 不愿意 meet middle ground 达成中间立场 that male suggested (20%)

  • 用暂停建议掩盖谈判困境

    P11
    Well, let's take a break. We're not getting very far. Perhaps we should think about this.

    程序性中断语 let's take a break let's pause here maybe we should sleep on it let's reconvene later we need time to think let's step back perhaps we should adjourn

    男方用 let's take a break 来 gracefully exit 优雅退出 from unproductive exchange 无效交流,We're not getting very far 是 rare explicit acknowledgment 罕见的明确承认 of impasse 僵局。Perhaps we should think 表示 need for reflection 需要反思 or external consultation 外部咨询(可能向上级汇报)。这个 implication 言外之意是 negotiation has reached limit 谈判已达极限 of frontline negotiators' authority 一线谈判者的权限,gap 差距(20% vs 40%)too large 过大 to bridge 无法弥合 without higher-level decision 没有更高层决策,暂停是 strategic necessity 战略必要性而非 progress sign 进展信号

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

4 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

  • First of all, the campaign was late.
    第2段,第2句

    主系表结构虽然常见,但本句过于简短,不具备四六级或考研真题中常见的复杂句式特征,代表性较弱。

  • As a result, the campaign failed.
    第2段,第5句

    简单句带状语是常见结构,但过于基础。"As a result"引出结果的用法在写作中常见,有一定典型性,但句子整体结构过于简单,不足以代表考试中常见的复杂句式。

  • The ad specifications had not been given in detail.
    第6题,B

    被动语态在四六级和考研阅读中频繁出现,过去完成时虽不如一般过去时常见,但也是典型时态之一,整体结构具有中等代表性,掌握后可迁移至相似句式。

  • Reflect on their respective mistakes.
    第8题,D

    祈使句是基础句式,在口语指令、应用文(如说明书、规章)中常见,有一定代表性,但在四六级或考研阅读长难句中占比不高,典型性中等。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 的常见问题

2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
客户与广告代理公司就一次失败的广告活动进行谈判。客户因错过截止日期和贸易展会而寻求赔偿,而代理公司提供延期方案。双方就责任归属展开辩论,并在降低费用或重做活动方面难以达成一致。(英文表述:A negotiation between a client and agency over a failed advertising campaign. The client seeks compensation for missed deadlines and trade fairs, while the agency offers extensions. Both parties debate responsibility and struggle to reach agreement on reduced fees or campaign repetition.)
2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 245 词、11 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 233 篇(占 39%)。
2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 11 段按对话骨架分为 11 个意群:第1段——机构提出延期补偿方案;第2段——客户详述问题并质询责任;第3段——机构辩解推卸部分责任;第4段——客户反驳责任推诿;第5段——机构回避争论重申方案;第6段——客户拒绝并提出严厉要求;第7段——机构提出折中对案;第8段——客户表达不满和损失;第9段——机构提出责任共担观点;第10段——客户修改方案再施压;第11段——机构提议休会重新考虑。
2015年6月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 3 个:summarise(总结;概括)、specification(规格说明;技术要求;具体要求)、extension(延长;延期;延长的期限),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: