2015年6月英语六级真题第3套 Part II Section C (3)

文章开篇使用了 precise numerical data，提到 millions of users 和 more than eleven thousand local libraries。这种 quantitative approach 为 Amazon's Kindle library-lending service 的 scale 和 reach 提供了 concrete evidence，让读者直观感受到这个 service 的 magnitude。数据的引入增强了 news report 的 credibility 和 objectivity，同时也突出了这个 event 的 significance，为后续讨论 publishers 和 libraries 之间的 debate 奠定了 factual foundation。

信号词 millions thousands approximately over more than nearly around about up to as many as percent statistics show

仿写： 在写作 news reports 时，你可以问自己：这个 event 涉及多少 people？覆盖多少 locations？产生了怎样的 impact？然后用 concrete numbers 来回答。比如报道一个 educational reform，你可以写："The new policy will affect approximately 3 million students across 2,500 schools." 仿写模版："[Event/Service] + [specific number] + [affected entity] + [scope description with number]"

第二段通过 comparative context 指出 users of other devices 已经能够 borrow library books，然后引出 Amazon's entry 将 reopen a debate。这个 background information 的设置非常巧妙，它不仅说明了 Amazon 并非 first mover，更重要的是通过 "reopen a debate" 这个表述，暗示这个 conflict 并非新问题，而是一个 ongoing issue。这种 contextual framing 帮助 readers 理解当前 event 的 historical dimension 和 broader implications，为下文详细展开 publishers 和 libraries 的 conflict 做好了 smooth transition。

信号词 already previously before until now historically traditionally in the past formerly used to once earlier prior to

仿写： 写作时问自己：这个 event 之前发生了什么？其他 similar situations 是怎样的？这能帮你 establish context。比如报道一个 technology breakthrough，你可以写："While competitor X has offered similar features since last year, Company Y's new approach is expected to intensify the industry debate over..." 仿写模版："[Comparative context] + [current event] + [anticipated consequence/connection to larger issue]"

文章引入 Bill Rosenblatt 这个 expert source，并使用了非常生动的 metaphor："Publishers and libraries are enemies that occur in nature like snakes and monkeys." 这个 direct quotation 不仅带来了 authoritative perspective，更通过 vivid imagery 让 abstract conflict 变得 concrete 和 memorable。随后的 quote 清晰地 articulate 了双方的 opposing interests，libraries 希望 unlimited access，publishers 希望 sell more books。这种 expert testimony 的运用增强了文章的 credibility，同时让 complex issue 变得 accessible 和 engaging。

信号词 says notes points out explains argues claims states observes comments remarks according to quotes announces

仿写： 在 incorporating quotes 时，选择那些 both informative and memorable 的 statements。问自己：这个 expert 说的话能否 illuminate the issue？有没有 distinctive language？比如："Industry analyst Jane Smith notes, 'This is not just a business dispute—it's a fundamental clash between access and ownership in the digital age.'" 仿写模版："[Expert identification] + [says/notes/points out] + '['vivid or clear statement that captures essence of issue']'"

第四段用 neutral tone 解释了 "the law of first sale" 这个 legal concept。文章列举了 multiple examples（book, CD, DVD）并使用 plain language 描述你可以 read it, give it away, lend it, resell it, burn it。这种 objective exposition 避免了 taking sides，而是 present facts，让 readers 自己 understand the legal framework。这个 descriptive approach 为后续讨论 digital products 的 different treatment 提供了 neutral baseline，让 contrast 更加 apparent。

信号词 is defined as refers to means includes consists of involves applies to covers encompasses permits allows

仿写： Practice objective description 时，focus on using factual language 和 avoiding loaded terms。列举 concrete examples 能让 abstract concepts 更 clear。比如解释一个 policy："The regulation applies to all vehicles including cars, trucks, motorcycles, and buses. Owners can operate, transfer, or modify these vehicles within legal parameters." 仿写模版："[Define concept] + [list specific examples] + [describe what actions are permitted/how it works]"

文章在多处运用了 contrast 来 highlight conflicts。第三段对比 libraries 想要 unlimited access 和 publishers 想要 sell more books；第五段对比 physical books 的 lending rights 和 digital products 的 restrictions；第六段对比 HarperCollins 的 26-time limit 和 other publishers 的 perpetual lending。这些 contrasts 让 central tension 非常 vivid，帮助 readers 清晰地 grasp the stakes 和 understand why this debate matters。Through juxtaposition，文章让 opposing positions 和 different approaches 一目了然。

信号词 but however while whereas in contrast on the other hand conversely unlike different from opposed to rather than instead of

仿写： 运用 contrast 时，clearly identify the two sides or situations being compared。Use parallel structure 来 make the contrast sharper。比如："Traditional publishers require authors to relinquish rights for decades, while digital-first platforms offer authors full control and monthly royalties." 仿写模版："[Entity A] + [action/characteristic] + while/whereas/but + [Entity B] + [contrasting action/characteristic]"

虽然文章没有使用 explicit questions，但它通过 strategic information sequencing 创造了 implicit questioning effect。比如第二段提到 Amazon's entry "is likely to reopen a debate"，这 prompts readers 去思考：what debate? 然后第三段就 address this。第五段提到 first sale law "does not include digital products"，这 naturally raises the question：那 digital products 怎么办？接下来就解释 digital rights management。这种 rhetorical structure guides reader curiosity 并 creates a logical flow of information。

信号词 why how what which raises the question this begs the question one might ask the question becomes this leads to prompting concerns about

仿写： Create implicit questions 通过 introducing concepts that naturally prompt inquiry，然后 provide answers in subsequent sentences or paragraphs。比如："The company announced a major policy shift. The change affects how users access premium content." (这 prompts: what shift? how does it affect access?) 仿写模版："[Introduce intriguing statement or concept] + [Let natural question arise in reader's mind] + [Provide answer/explanation in next segment]"