2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section B (2) · 听力

2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2)

说明文 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇说明文全文 254 词、4 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语六级文章中占 39%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

4 段英文原文

以下为2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 的听力原文,共 4 段。左侧 P1–P4 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

In 2014, one in 16 Americans visited the hospital emergency room for home injuries. One of the main causes of these accidents? A wandering mind. By one estimate, people daydream through nearly half of their waking hours.

Psychologists have recently focused on the tendency to think about something other than the task one is doing. For one experiment, researchers developed an app to analyze the relationship between daydreaming and happiness. They found that the average person's mind wandered most frequently (about 65% of the time) during personal activities, such as brushing their teeth and combing their hair. Respondents' minds tended to wander more when they felt upset rather than happy. They were more likely to wander toward pleasant topics than unpleasant ones.

How do daydreams affect daydreamers? A wandering mind leaves us vulnerable when driving. In one study, researchers interviewed 955 people involved in traffic accidents. The majority of them reported having daydreamed just before the accident.

Yet other research suggests that daydreaming has benefits. Researchers have found that it gives us a chance to think about our goals and it also seems to increase creativity. In one experiment, 145 undergraduates completed four "unusual uses" tasks, each requiring them to list as many uses as possible for an everyday object. After the first pair of tasks was completed, one group of participants was assigned an undemanding activity intended to cause their minds to wander. When all the participants proceeded to the second pair of tasks, the daydreamers performed 40 percent better than the others.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

4 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Hidden Danger of a Wandering Mind

    Daydreaming is a widespread mental state that frequently causes home injuries, affecting nearly half of people's waking hours.

    这个 opening paragraph 为全文的 balanced discussion 设定了 tone。它通过强调 daydreaming 的 negative consequence 来 justify 研究的 necessity,同时用 prevalence data 暗示这是 universal human experience。在整体 article structure 中,这个段落 establishes the stakes,让读者明白为什么要关注 daydreaming。它为后续的 psychological research 和 dual nature exploration 提供了 practical motivation,使得 academic discussion 有了 real-world relevance。

    数据引入加因果揭示
  2. P2

    Research Findings on Mind-Wandering Patterns

    Recent psychological research using app-based experiments reveals that mind-wandering occurs most frequently during routine personal activities, is associated with negative emotional states, yet tends toward pleasant content.

    这个段落在全文中扮演 evidence-building 的角色。它通过 rigorous research 将第一段提出的 phenomenon 从 anecdotal 提升到 empirical level。在 article structure 中,这是 foundation-laying paragraph,为后续讨论 consequences 和 benefits 提供 factual basis。特别重要的是,它开始显示 daydreaming 的 complexity:虽然与 negative emotions 相关,但 content 倾向 positive,这种 nuanced view 为第四段的 benefits discussion 埋下伏笔,体现了文章 balanced perspective 的开始。段落通过 scientific lens 让读者看到 daydreaming 不是简单的 good or bad,而是 multifaceted phenomenon。

    研究方法加分层发现
  3. P3

    The Dangerous Cost of Mind-Wandering

    A wandering mind creates serious safety risks, particularly while driving, as evidenced by a study showing most traffic accident victims had daydreamed immediately before their accidents.

    这个段落在全文 argumentation structure 中代表 negative side 的 peak。它呼应第一段的 home injuries,但提供了更 severe 和 well-documented example。在 article balance 中,这个段落 deliberately precedes benefits discussion,形成 problem-solution 或 cost-benefit 的 logical flow。段落的 brevity 和 directness 使得 negative impact 更加 striking,为读者制造 tension:既然 daydreaming 如此 dangerous,为什么人们还会 engage in it?这种 tension 为第四段的 benefits revelation 创造了 dramatic effect,也体现了说明文中 build suspense through juxtaposition 的技巧。

    问题引导加实证支撑
  4. P4

    The Surprising Benefits of a Wandering Mind

    Despite its dangers, daydreaming offers significant cognitive benefits, including goal reflection and substantially enhanced creativity, as demonstrated by a 40% performance improvement in creative tasks.

    这个 concluding paragraph 完成了全文的 balanced presentation,是 article's resolution。它不是简单 negate 前面的 negative findings,而是 add complexity,展示 daydreaming 的 dual nature。在 argumentative structure 中,这个段落 provides nuance,让读者明白 phenomenon 的 context-dependent nature:在 safety-critical situations 是 liability,但在 creative work 中是 asset。40% improvement 这个 powerful statistic 与第三段的 traffic accidents 形成 memorable contrast,使文章结尾 impactful。文章通过这个段落达成 sophisticated conclusion:不是 condemn 或 celebrate daydreaming,而是 recognize 它的 complexity 和 importance of context。这种 nuanced perspective 是 high-quality expository writing 的标志,也回应了 opening paragraph 建立的 why this matters question。

    转折标志加递进论证
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

4 道逐段细节自检题

针对2019年12月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 home injuries main causes

    What is identified as one of the main causes of home injuries requiring emergency-room visits?

    • A A lack of emergency-room services.
    • B Spending too much time daydreaming at work.
    • C A wandering mind.
    • D Frequent visits to the hospital.
    • E Dangerous personal activities at home.
    • F A decline in Americans' waking hours.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    原文先陈述 emergency-room visits 的事实,紧接着用 One of the main causes of these accidents? 提出解释,再给出 A wandering mind。正确项完整对应 cause 与 accidents 的指代链。其设置障碍在于命题人把答案放在简短的补充句中,而不是放在前面的数据句里;若考生只记住 one in 16 或 2014,就会把背景事实误当成原因。

    问后短语截取 时间极紧时,直接以题干中的 home injuries 扫描并锁定 第1段,再在相邻语句中寻找带有 causes 的短解释结构。不要完整翻译统计句;采用“问句后补语截取法”,即只读取解释性问句后的名词短语,再回头用正确项核对它是否承担 cause 角色。此法绕开数字背景,能最快判定正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 app felt upset

    What did the app-based study find about people's emotional states and mind wandering?

    • A People's minds wandered more when they felt happy than when they felt upset.
    • B Mind wandering occurred only during personal activities.
    • C Unpleasant topics were more likely to attract wandering minds.
    • D People's minds tended to wander more when they felt upset than when they felt happy.
    • E The app reduced mind wandering by improving people's moods.
    • F People who daydreamed were generally unhappy.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项保留了原文的核心变量 minds tended to wander、felt upset、happy 以及比较方向 more ... than。它准确呈现研究发现,而没有把活动场景、话题偏好或研究工具误当成结论。障碍在于原文同时给出 65% of the time、personal activities 和 pleasant topics 等多个相邻细节,考生必须根据 emotional states 这一限定进行筛选。

    双词夹读 紧张时先用 app 锁定 第2段,不必逐句精读。随后执行“双词夹读”:只抓表示情绪的两个对照词及其间的比较标记 more、rather than,然后用正确项检查比较方向。不要被 65% 或 personal activities 拖慢,因为题干的 emotional states 已经排除了它们。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 955 people traffic accidents

    What did the majority of the 955 people involved in traffic accidents report?

    • A They had been driving for an unusually long time before the accident.
    • B They felt happier after the accident.
    • C They were performing personal activities when the accident occurred.
    • D They had deliberately tried to increase their creativity.
    • E They had daydreamed just before the accident.
    • F They believed that daydreaming never affected driving safety.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    正确项准确对应 majority、reported、daydreamed 和 just before the accident 四个信息点。它保留了“多数人的自述”这一证据等级,也保留了 just before 所限定的时间关系。命题障碍在于前一句提到 driving vulnerability,容易诱导考生选择更笼统的驾驶风险表述;但题干要求的是 interview 中的具体报告。

    数字主干连线 考场上可把 955 当作“数字跳读点”,直接进入 第3段。随后不翻译整段,只沿数字后的语法主干读取 interviewed → majority → reported,截取 reported 后的宾语内容,并用正确项核对 just before 的时间标记。这个“主干连线法”比从段首顺读更快,也能避开对 vulnerable 的误判。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 second pair daydreamers

    How did the daydreamers perform on the second pair of unusual-uses tasks?

    • A They performed 40 percent worse than the other participants.
    • B They showed no difference from the other participants.
    • C They completed fewer tasks after doing an undemanding activity.
    • D They listed more uses only for everyday objects they liked.
    • E They became less likely to think about their goals.
    • F They performed 40 percent better than the other participants.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    正确项精确复现结果句中的比较关系:daydreamers performed 40 percent better than the others。它同时回答了表现程度、比较方向和比较对象。障碍在于实验前的 undemanding activity intended to cause minds to wander 很显眼,考生可能误选处理措施;此外,40 percent 也很容易被改写为更差、相同或只比第一组任务表现更好。

    结果句尾扫读 最快的做法是以 second pair 直接锁定 第4段 的后半部,再使用“结果句尾扫读”:从 performed 向右读取百分比、比较级和比较对象,形成一个完整结果块。无需先理解 unusual uses 的具体任务规则;用正确项与这个结果块逐词比对,即可迅速判定答案。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

4 个意群的说明文骨架

按说明文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引出现象

    作者通过 home injuries 这个 concrete example 来引出 daydreaming 这个核心 phenomenon,用 statistics 数据(one in 16 Americans)和 estimate(nearly half of waking hours)来 establish 这个现象的 prevalence 和 significance。这是 typical 的说明文 opening strategy,用 surprising fact 来 grab readers' attention。

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 emergency room injuries 这个 alarming detail 来 introduce daydreaming 作为文章的 central topic,simultaneously 建立了这个 phenomenon 的 widespread nature。它为后续的 detailed analysis 奠定 foundation,让 readers 意识到 daydreaming 是个值得 explore 的 important subject。

    呈现走神的普遍性
  2. 科学研究视角

    这个 section 展示了 psychologists 如何 systematically study daydreaming 这个 phenomenon。通过 app-based experiment,researchers 揭示了 mind wandering 的 frequency patterns(65% during personal activities)和 emotional correlates(more when upset)。这是说明文中 typical 的 scientific evidence presentation,用 empirical findings 来 deepen understanding。

    这个 paragraph 通过 present scientific research 来 provide systematic understanding of daydreaming patterns。它 moves beyond 简单的 phenomenon identification,offering detailed insights into when 和 why people daydream。这种 empirical approach 是说明文 credibility 的 foundation,为后续 discuss consequences 和 benefits 建立 scientific basis。

    解析走神的发生规律
  3. 负面影响

    这个 brief section 专注于 daydreaming 的 negative consequences,specifically 在 driving safety 方面的 risks。通过 traffic accident study(955 people interviewed),作者 establish 了 causal connection between mind wandering 和 dangerous outcomes。这是说明文中 present balanced view 的一部分,showing phenomenon 的 problematic aspect。

    这个 concise paragraph 通过 concrete example(traffic accidents)来 illustrate daydreaming 的 practical dangers。它在 article structure 中 serve 为 counterpoint,providing negative perspective before presenting positive aspects。这种 balanced presentation 是 objective expository writing 的 hallmark,ensuring readers get complete picture。

    说明走神的危害
  4. 正面价值

    这个 concluding section 通过 present research findings 来 reveal daydreaming 的 beneficial aspects,包括 goal reflection 和 creativity enhancement。The undergraduate experiment(40 percent better performance)提供了 compelling quantitative evidence。这是说明文 typical 的 conclusion strategy,ending with positive note 同时 maintain scientific rigor。

    这个 final paragraph 通过 highlight positive outcomes 来 complete 文章的 balanced examination of daydreaming。它不仅 present benefits(goal thinking, creativity)而且 provide concrete experimental proof,giving readers nuanced understanding。这种 ending 让 article 从 simple warning 升华为 comprehensive analysis,which is characteristic of mature expository writing。

    揭示走神的益处
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段统计引题 P1

    说明文的首段 first paragraph 通常会通过具体的 statistics 或 facts 来引出 main subject。本文首段提到 one in 16 Americans 和 nearly half of their waking hours 这些数据,直接点明了 daydreaming 这个核心话题 core topic 的普遍性 prevalence

  2. 转折词标记对立面 P3 P4

    说明文常用 However, Yet, Other research 等 transitional markers 来引入不同的 aspects 或 contrasting views。本文第三段用 How 提问引出 negative effects,第四段用 Yet 转折引出 benefits。这种 structural pattern 表明文章在全面 examine 某个现象的 both sides

  3. 段首句提取维度 P2 P3 P4

    第二段探讨 psychological research 和 frequency,第三段聚焦 negative consequences(如 accidents),第四段转向 positive outcomes(如 creativity)。这种 parallel development 的段落安排 paragraph organization 表明文章在系统性地 cover different facets of the phenomenon

  4. 话题加多角度验证 P1 P2 P3 P4

    通过前三步,我们确认了:(1)文章介绍了 daydreaming 这个 prevalent topic;(2)展示了它的 negative effects(accidents)和 positive impacts(creativity);(3)整体采用 objective explanatory approach。这完全对应了给定主旨中的 explains, examining, negative effects, positive impacts 等关键要素 key elements

主旨信号词 wandering mind P1 focused on P2 Yet P4 vulnerable P3 benefits P4

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

本文阐释了白日梦现象,探讨了其在日常生活中的普遍性、其负面影响(如增加事故风险)以及其积极作用(包括增强创造力和促进目标反思)。
This article explains the phenomenon of daydreaming, examining its prevalence in daily life, its negative effects such as increased accident risk, and its positive impacts including enhanced creativity and goal reflection.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • wander 游离;走神;偏离

    我们现在把三条线索串联起来。首先,第1段 通过 daydream 这个同义词给了我们初步方向,提示 wander 与思绪飘忽相关。然后 第2段 用学术语言精确定义了这个概念:'think about something other than the task',这就是 wander 的核心内涵——偏离当前任务。最后 第3段 用 driving accidents 这个具体场景验证了我们的推断:正因为 mind wanders 导致注意力不在驾驶上,才会 vulnerable 并引发事故。三条线索从不同角度——同义替换、定义解释、因果验证——共同指向同一个语义中心。

    抽象动词的三角定位法
  • undemanding 要求不高的;轻松的;不费力的

    让我们整合这三个维度的 evidence。Morphology 告诉我们 'un-' + 'demanding' 构成否定意义,指向'不要求的'这个方向。然后 purpose clause 'intended to cause their minds to wander' 提供了 functional context:这种 activity 的设计目标就是让 minds 能够自由 wander,所以它必须是 cognitively undemanding 的。最后,experimental structure 的对比进一步确认:它是介于 challenging tasks 之间的 low-effort interval。三条线索从 word structure、functional purpose 和 experimental contrast 三个角度,共同锁定了 undemanding 的核心语义。

    否定前缀词的结构-功能-对比法
  • vulnerable 易受伤害的;脆弱的;易受攻击的

    现在把三条线索 weave together。首先,causality chain 揭示 vulnerable 是连接 wandering mind 和 accidents 的 intermediate state,指向 susceptibility。其次,thematic echo 将 vulnerable 放入全文'走神导致伤害'的大框架中,确认它表达的是 injury-prone 的状态。最后,driving scenario 这个 high-risk context 凸显了 vulnerable 的本质——protective mechanisms 失效、exposed to danger。三条线索从 logical structure、thematic coherence 和 contextual scenario 三个层面,converge on 同一核心含义。

    状态形容词的因果-主题-场景定位法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 列数字

    P1 P2 P3 P4

    文章开篇就用 one in 16 Americans 这个 specific statistic 来说明 home injuries 的 prevalence,让 abstract concept 变得 concrete and tangible。紧接着又用 nearly half of their waking hours 这个数据来 quantify daydreaming 的频繁程度,让读者对 the phenomenon 有 immediate, visceral understanding。第2段 中的 65% 进一步 reinforce 这种 data-driven approach,使 daydreaming 从 vague impression 变成 measurable behavior。这些 numbers 共同构建了文章的 credibility foundation,让主旨关于 daydreaming 的 dual nature(既有 risks 又有 benefits)显得 evidence-based 而非 subjective opinion。

    信号词 one in 16 nearly half 65% 40 percent 955 people 145 undergraduates four tasks

    仿写: 当你要 explain a widespread phenomenon 时,问自己:Can I quantify it? 比如说 screen time,与其说 many people spend too much time on phones,不如说 the average person checks their phone 96 times per day。仿写模版:In [year], [specific fraction/percentage] of [population] experienced [phenomenon]. By one estimate, [subject] [verb] through [quantified portion] of their [time period].

  • 举例子

    P2 P3 P4

    文章用 brushing teeth and combing hair 这些 everyday activities 作为 concrete examples 来 illustrate when mind-wandering occurs most。这些 relatable instances 让 abstract psychological concept 变得 immediate and recognizable。第3段 的 traffic accidents example 则 demonstrate the negative consequences,而 第4段 的 'unusual uses' experiment 用 specific research scenario 来 showcase the benefits。这些 examples serve different purposes:daily activities 用于 relatability,accidents 用于 warning,experiment 用于 scientific validation。Together they support 文章主旨的 balanced view,showing daydreaming 的 multifaceted nature through varied concrete instances。

    信号词 such as for example in one study in one experiment for one experiment

    仿写: 选择 examples 时要问:Is this specific enough? Is it relatable to my audience? 避免 vague generalizations。比如与其说 people multitask,不如说 checking emails while in a Zoom meeting。仿写模版:[General statement]. For example, [specific scenario/activity] demonstrates [aspect of the general statement]. Respondents reported [concrete behavior] when [specific condition].

  • 作比较

    P2 P4

    第2段 中用 upset vs. happy 和 pleasant topics vs. unpleasant ones 这些 contrasting pairs 来 reveal patterns in daydreaming behavior。第4段 的 40 percent better 直接 compare daydreamers' performance with non-daydreamers。这些 comparisons 不仅 highlight differences,更重要的是 reveal the nuanced relationship between mental state and mind-wandering。通过 juxtaposition,文章 shows that daydreaming is not uniform—it varies with emotional state and has differential effects。这种 comparative approach supports 主旨中的 dual nature theme,demonstrating through contrast that the phenomenon has both positive and negative dimensions depending on context。

    信号词 rather than more...than better than tended to wander more when

    仿写: 寻找 natural contrasts in your subject matter。问自己:What differs across conditions? What are the extremes? 使用 comparative structures like 'more...than', 'while X...Y', 'compared to'。仿写模版:[Subject] tended to [behavior] more when [condition A] rather than [condition B]. [Group A] performed [percentage] better than [Group B]. They were more likely to [action X] than [action Y].

  • 引资料

    P1 P2 P3 P4

    文章 extensively cites research findings,包括 'by one estimate', 'researchers developed an app', 'in one study, researchers interviewed 955 people', 'researchers have found'。这些 external sources of authority 不是作者的 personal opinion,而是 established research findings。第2段 引用 app-based research 来 establish the prevalence and patterns,第3段 引用 accident interviews 来 demonstrate risks,第4段 引用 creativity experiments 来 show benefits。这种 heavy reliance on research citations 让文章保持 objective, scientific tone,同时 build credibility for 主旨中的 balanced assessment。每个 citation serves as evidence for a specific aspect of daydreaming's dual nature。

    信号词 by one estimate researchers have found in one study in one experiment for one experiment other research suggests

    仿写: 当 making factual claims,问自己:Can I back this with a source? 使用 attribution phrases that signal research provenance。注意 vary your citation language 避免重复。仿写模版:By one estimate, [finding]. Researchers have found that [discovery]. In one study, [researchers] [methodology] and found [result]. [Authority] suggests that [claim].

  • 分类别

    P2 P3 P4

    第2段 将 mind-wandering occasions 分为 personal activities vs. other contexts,将 wandering direction 分为 pleasant topics vs. unpleasant ones。这种 categorization 帮助 organize the complex phenomenon of daydreaming into manageable subcategories。文章还 implicitly 将 daydreaming effects 分为 negative consequences (accidents) 和 positive outcomes (creativity)。这种 systematic classification 让读者能够 grasp the different dimensions and contexts of daydreaming,而不是把它当作 monolithic behavior。Classification supports 主旨的 complexity,showing that daydreaming 需要 differentiated understanding based on category—when it occurs, where the mind goes, and what effects emerge。

    信号词 such as during toward when...rather than

    仿写: 当 explaining a complex phenomenon,问:What are its types? What are its contexts? 建立 clear classification criteria。仿写模版:[Phenomenon] can be divided into [category A] and [category B]. During [type of activity], [behavior] occurred, while during [another type], [different pattern] emerged. [Subject] can be categorized as [pleasant/unpleasant, positive/negative, etc.].

  • 下定义

    P2

    虽然文章没有 explicit formal definition,但 第2段 首句 'the tendency to think about something other than the task one is doing' 实际上给 mind-wandering 下了一个 operational definition。这个 definition 是 functional 和 behavioral 的,clarifying what the term means in the context of psychological research。这个 defining statement 为整篇文章 establishes the conceptual foundation—what exactly is being studied when we talk about daydreaming or mind-wandering。这个 definition 的精准性 enables 后续所有的 research findings 有 clear referent,支撑了主旨中对 daydreaming phenomenon 的系统阐述。

    信号词 refers to define as is characterized by the tendency to

    仿写: 当 introducing a key concept,especially if it's technical or potentially ambiguous,provide a clear definition。问自己:What exactly am I talking about? What distinguishes this from similar concepts? 仿写模版:[Term] refers to [essential characteristic/function]. Psychologists define [concept] as [precise description]. [Phenomenon] is characterized by [defining features].

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

8 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 走神导致家庭意外伤害的严重性被数据强化

    P1
    One of the main causes of these accidents? A wandering mind.

    因果强调类 One of the main causes one of the main causes a major factor a key reason primarily due to largely because of the leading cause

    这个 implication 通过 statistical data(2014年1/16的美国人因 home injuries 去 ER)加上 causal emphasis 来 construct 一个 alarming picture。言外之意是:wandering mind 不是一个 negligible 或 occasional 的 problem,而是一个 widespread 且 consequential 的 phenomenon,值得 readers 认真 take seriously。对于 article's main theme 而言,这个 opening implication 起到了 set the stage 的作用,为后续 explore daydreaming 的 negative effects 和 positive aspects 建立了 necessary context 和 urgency。

  • 走神时长超出常人预期

    P1
    people daydream through nearly half of their waking hours

    数量强调类 nearly half as much as up to as many as a full no less than a whopping

    这个 implication 传递的 message 是:daydreaming 的 frequency 远比 typical person 会 consciously recognize 的要 much more common。'Nearly half of waking hours' 意味着我们 awake 的时间里有将近一半是在 not fully present,这个 proportion 对很多 readers 来说会是 surprisingly high。这个 implicit message 服务于 article's overall argument by establishing daydreaming as a pervasive human experience 而不是 occasional phenomenon,为后续 explore 其 impacts(both negative and positive)提供了 empirical foundation。它也 explains 为什么 understanding daydreaming 如此 relevant 和 important。

  • 走神在个人活动时更频繁暗示其普遍性

    P2
    the average person's mind wandered most frequently (about 65% of the time) during personal activities, such as brushing their teeth and combing their hair

    比较级强调类 most frequently more likely less often most commonly tend to...more least likely predominantly

    这个 implication 传递的 deeper meaning 是:mind wandering 在 routine, automatic, low-engagement activities 中最为 prevalent,暗示 daydreaming 与 task nature 有密切关系。言外之意是当 activities don't require much conscious attention,我们的 mind 自然会 drift away。这对于 article's thesis 的作用是 establish 一个 important characteristic of daydreaming—它不是 random 的而是与 activity type 相关,为后续讨论 when and why daydreaming occurs 以及其 impacts 提供了 psychological basis。它也 helps readers understand 为什么某些 situations(如 driving)中的 mind wandering 更 dangerous,因为这些 seemingly routine activities 实际上 require sustained attention。

  • 走神的情绪关联暗示其功能性

    P2
    Respondents' minds tended to wander more when they felt upset rather than happy. They were more likely to wander toward pleasant topics than unpleasant ones.

    对比类 rather than instead of as opposed to whereas while in contrast to unlike

    这个 implication 揭示了 daydreaming 的一个 important psychological function:它可能是一种 emotional regulation mechanism。言外之意是人们并非 randomly daydream,而是在感到 upset 时 more prone to it,且 daydreams 的 content 倾向于 pleasant,suggesting mind wandering might serve as a way to 逃避 negative feelings 或 seek psychological comfort。这对 article's main theme 的 contribution 是 add complexity to our understanding of daydreaming—它不只是 attention lapse,而可能是 adaptive mental process。这个 insight 为后面讨论 daydreaming 的 benefits(如 creativity)铺垫了基础,因为它 suggests mind wandering 有其 functional purpose 而不是纯粹的 cognitive failure。

  • 用词强化走神与事故的因果联系

    P3
    The majority of them reported having daydreamed just before the accident.

    时间接近性强调类 just before right before immediately before moments before shortly before seconds before right prior to

    这个 implication 通过 combine temporal proximity with statistical prevalence 来 build a compelling case for daydreaming's dangerous effects。言外之意是 daydreaming directly contributes to traffic accidents—虽然文章 carefully avoids 直接说 'causes',但 'just before' + 'majority' 的 combination leaves little room for alternative interpretation。这个 carefully constructed implication serves the article's purpose by presenting the negative side of daydreaming with strong empirical backing,creating a balanced view before transitioning to discussing its benefits。对于 overall theme,这个 section establishes real-world consequences,making the discussion not just theoretical but practically relevant,尤其对于 exam readers 来说这种 balanced presentation 是 typical expository structure。

  • 转折词引出走神的积极面

    P4
    Yet other research suggests that daydreaming has benefits.

    转折类 Yet yet however nevertheless nonetheless on the other hand but

    这个 implication 标志着 article's argumentative structure 从 risks 向 benefits 的 deliberate transition。言外之意是虽然 daydreaming 有 documented dangers(especially in safety-critical contexts),但这不是 complete picture—它也有 valuable positive aspects that deserve equal attention。通过使用 'Yet' 和 'other research',作者 implies 科学界对 daydreaming 的 understanding 是 multifaceted 的,不能 simply dismiss it as purely negative。这对 article's overall theme 至关重要:它 establishes daydreaming as a complex phenomenon with both costs and benefits,rather than something to be simply avoided。这种 balanced presentation 也 aligns with typical structure of expository texts in English exams,which often require students to recognize nuanced, multi-perspective arguments。

  • 实验设计细节暗示走神的创造力机制

    P4
    one group of participants was assigned an undemanding activity intended to cause their minds to wander

    方法论说明类 undemanding activity intended to cause intended to cause designed to induce meant to trigger aimed at producing to elicit for the purpose of generating

    这个 implication 通过 experimental methodology 揭示了关于 mind wandering nature 的 important insight:它不是 pure attention failure 而可能是 brain's default mode when not engaged in demanding tasks。言外之意是 mind wandering 可能代表一种 ongoing background cognitive process that surfaces when freed from immediate task demands。这个 understanding 对 article's argument about creativity benefits 至关重要—如果 mind wandering 是这样的 process,那么它可能 allow for different types of cognitive processing(如 associative thinking, remote connections)that foster creativity。这个 methodological detail 虽然 briefly mentioned,但实际上 provides theoretical foundation for why daydreaming might enhance creative performance,thus supporting the article's balanced view of this phenomenon。

  • 量化结果强化走神对创造力的积极影响

    P4
    the daydreamers performed 40 percent better than the others

    数量效果强调类 40 percent better twice as likely 50% increase three times more significantly higher substantially greater markedly improved

    这个 implication 通过 concrete quantification 将 daydreaming's creative benefits 从 abstract concept 转化为 tangible, measurable outcome。言外之意是走神对 creativity 的提升不是 marginal 或 questionable,而是 substantial 和 empirically validated—40% 是一个任何 reader 都能 appreciate 的 significant improvement。这个 powerful closing statement serves the article's overall purpose by ending on a strongly positive note,balancing earlier discussion of risks with concrete evidence of benefits。对于 exam readers,这个 quantified finding 也 easy to remember and cite,making it an effective concluding point that reinforces the article's balanced, evidence-based perspective on daydreaming as a phenomenon with both costs and benefits。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( balanced and objective with cautious acknowledgment)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 识别正反并陈结构 P1 P2 P3 P4

    这个 step 能帮助我们 determine 作者是 one-sided 还是 balanced,因为 biased writers 倾向于只 emphasize 一个方面,而 objective writers 会 present multiple perspectives,这在说明文中是 credibility 的标志。

  2. 区分事实陈述与评价性语言 P2 P3 P4

    这个 method 有效是因为 attitude 常常 embedded in word choice,说明文中 neutral writers 倾向于 cite studies 和 use statistics 而不是 personal opinions,这种 evidence-based approach 反映了 objective stance。

  3. 识别限定性修饰语 P2 P4

    这个 step 关键因为 attitude 的 strength 体现在 certainty level,说明文中 objective writers 认识到 research limitations 会用 'seems to', 'suggests', 'may' 这类 tentative language,而非 make absolute claims。

  4. 整合多维度信号 P1 P2 P3 P4

    综述 step 必要是因为 single indicator 可能 misleading,只有 integrating multiple signals 才能 accurately gauge 作者的 true stance,在说明文中 objectivity 是通过 multiple layers 的 evidence 体现的。

文中的态度信号词

  • Yet P4

    这个 contrast marker 'yet' 起到 pivotal role,它 signals 作者要 present alternative perspective,在说明文中这种 transition 表明作者不是 one-sided 而是 considering different angles,体现了 balanced objectivity。

    同类词 yet however nevertheless nonetheless still

  • suggests P4

    这个 hedging verb 'suggests' 体现了 cautious tone,作者没有 claim 'proves' 或 'demonstrates',而是用 tentative language,在说明文中这种 qualified expression 反映 scientific rigor 和 objective restraint。

    同类词 indicates seems to appears to may might

  • benefits P4

    这个 positive noun 'benefits' 和前文的 negative aspects 形成 counterbalance,作者在 presenting risks 之后 acknowledge advantages,这种 two-sided coverage 是说明文 objectivity 的重要 manifestation。

    同类词 advantages positive effects merits upsides strengths

  • one estimate P1

    这个 attribution phrase 'one estimate' 表明作者在 citing external sources 而非 expressing personal opinion,在说明文中这种 evidence-based reporting 是 objective approach 的标志。

    同类词 one study researchers found studies show experiments revealed data indicates

  • vulnerable P3

    这个 negative descriptor 'vulnerable' 揭示了 daydreaming 的 downside,但作者只是 factually reporting research findings 而非 emotionally condemning,在说明文中这种 neutral reporting of negative aspects 体现 objective documentation。

    同类词 risk accidents danger hazard threat

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇说明文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇说明文?

  1. 首段呈现客观现象 P1

    第1段 开头直接 present 了一个 statistical fact:'2014年,每16个美国人中就有1个因为 home injuries 去 emergency room',然后指出 main cause 是'wandering mind'。这是在 describe 一个 phenomenon,而不是 argue 一个 viewpoint,也不是 report 一个 breaking news event。议论文会直接 state 作者的 stance,新闻报道会强调 timeliness 和 specific event。

  2. 多角度阐释现象 P2 P3

    第2段 和 第3段 分别从不同 angles 来 explain'wandering mind'这个 phenomenon:第2段 介绍 psychologists 的 research findings 关于 daydreaming 的 frequency 和 conditions;第3段 探讨 daydreaming 的 negative effects,especially in driving。这些段落都是在 elaborate 和 explain 这个 phenomenon 的 different dimensions,而不是在 build up arguments 为了 convince readers 接受某个 opinion。新闻报道会按照 inverted pyramid structure,把最重要的 information 放在前面。

  3. 研究证据引入 P2 P3 P4

    全文 repeatedly 使用'researchers developed、researchers found、researchers interviewed、researchers have found'等 phrases 来 introduce research findings。第2段 的'Psychologists have recently focused on',第4段 的'yet other research suggests'都是 typical 的 expository markers。这些 expressions 强调的是 objective findings 和 scientific evidence,而不是 personal opinions 或 immediate news sources。

  4. 全面平衡阐述 P1 P2 P3 P4

    这篇文章的 structure 非常 typical:第1段 introduce the topic(wandering mind),第2段-3 explain 其 characteristics 和 negative effects,第4段 用'yet'转折 present 其 benefits。整个 structure 是在 comprehensive 地 explain 这个 phenomenon 的 different aspects,既讲 dangers 也讲 benefits,保持 informative balance,而不是 one-sided 地 argue 某个 position。没有 clear thesis statement 说'we should stop daydreaming'或'daydreaming is beneficial',也没有 news lead 说'yesterday某个 event occurred'。

  5. 文体功能定位 P1 P2 P3 P4

    这篇文章完美符合说明文特征:开篇 present 了'wandering mind'这个 phenomenon,中间段落从 frequency、causes、negative effects、positive benefits 等 multiple aspects 进行 systematic explanation,全程使用 research findings 作为 evidence base,整体保持 informative 和 balanced tone,没有 push 某个 specific viewpoint,也没有 report 某个 specific event。文章的 ultimate goal 是让 readers understand what daydreaming is and how it affects us,而不是 convince readers to do something 或 inform them about a breaking news。

哪些词暴露了说明文体裁?

  • one of the main causes P1 因果关系说明词 the reason is this is because as a result consequently therefore
  • by one estimate P1 数据引用说明词 according to research studies show statistics indicate data suggests researchers found
  • for one experiment P2 研究过程说明词 in one study researchers developed the experiment involved participants were asked to the procedure included
  • they found that P2 研究发现呈现词 results showed findings indicate it was observed the data revealed analysis showed
  • how do daydreams affect daydreamers P3 说明问题引导词 how do/does what is why does what are the effects what causes
  • yet other research suggests P4 多角度呈现词 yet other research however, studies also show on the other hand alternatively in contrast
  • in one experiment P4 实验例证说明词 for example for instance in a study to illustrate a case in point
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

1 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

  • It tends to dwell upon their joyous experiences.
    第12题,A

    简单句结构在考试中常见,tend to do 也是典型的动词搭配用法,但本句过于简洁,缺少从句、复杂修饰或多重嵌套等考试中频繁出现的复杂句式特征,代表性一般。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 的常见问题

2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章阐释了白日梦现象,探讨了其在日常生活中的普遍性、其负面影响(如增加事故风险)以及其积极作用(包括增强创造力和促进目标反思)。(英文表述:This article explains the phenomenon of daydreaming, examining its prevalence in daily life, its negative effects such as increased accident risk, and its positive impacts including enhanced creativity and goal reflection.)
2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为说明文,作者立场是客观中立(balanced and objective with cautious acknowledgment)。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 254 词、4 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 233 篇(占 39%)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 4 段按说明文骨架分为 4 个意群:第1段——引出现象;第2段——科学研究视角;第3段——负面影响;第4段——正面价值。
2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(balanced and objective with cautious acknowledgment)。判断路径:识别正反并陈结构 → 区分事实陈述与评价性语言 → 识别限定性修饰语 → 整合多维度信号;文中的态度信号词包括 Yet(第4段)、suggests(第4段)、benefits(第4段)、one estimate(第1段)、vulnerable(第3段)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section B (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 3 个:wander(游离;走神;偏离)、undemanding(要求不高的;轻松的;不费力的)、vulnerable(易受伤害的;脆弱的;易受攻击的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: