2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A
CET-4 · 来自 2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 · Part III Section A · 完形填空(选词填空)

2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A

说明文 · 完形填空(选词填空) · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章的精读视角页——这篇说明文全文 237 词、3 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语四级文章中占 32%),作者立场为「消极批判」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

3 段英文原文

以下为2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 的完形填空(选词填空)原文,共 3 段。左侧 P1–P3 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

It's our guilty pleasure: Watching TV is the most common everyday activity, after work and sleep, in many parts of the world. Americans view five hours of TV each day, and while we know that spending so much time sitting passively can lead to obesity(肥胖症) and other diseases, researchers have now quantified just how harmful being a couch potato can be.

In an analysis of data from eight large previously published studies, a Harvard-led group reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that for every two hours per day spent channel surfing, the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes Journal of the American Medical Association(糖尿病) rose 20% over 8.5 years, the risk of heart disease increased 15% over a decade, and the odds of dying prematurely climbed 13% during a seven-year follow-up. All of these outcomes are linked to a lack of physical exercise. But compared with other sedentary(久坐的) activities, like knitting, viewing TV may be especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits. For one, the sheer number of hours we pass watching TV dwarfs the time we spend on anything else. And other studies have found that watching ads for beer and popcorn may make you more likely to consume them.

Even so, the authors admit that they didn't compare different sedentary activities to determine whether TV watching was linked to a greater risk of diabetes, heart disease or early death compared with, say, reading.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

3 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Hidden Cost of TV Viewing

    Excessive TV viewing is a common habit with measurable health risks.

    本段承担 introduction 的作用:它从全球普遍的 TV habit 切入,迅速把读者的注意力引向 health consequences。它为下文的 research data 预设了问题,即“看电视究竟有多危险”,因此是全文文章主旨的背景铺垫和问题引入。

    抓现象后的危害转折
  2. P2

    Research Evidence on TV-Related Health Risks

    Studies show that more TV time raises health risks and promotes unhealthy behavior.

    本段是全文的 main body 和证据核心,它把第一段提出的 harmful 问题转化为可验证的 scientific findings。尤其是具体 percentages 使文章主旨中的“显著增加 diabetes、heart disease 和 early death 风险”获得直接支撑,同时对 TV-specific habits 作出进一步解释。

    统摄数据找研究结论
  3. P3

    A Limitation of the Study

    The study has a limitation in comparing TV viewing with other sedentary activities.

    本段承担 conclusion qualification 的作用,为前文强有力的 research evidence 加上必要边界。它使全文主旨更严谨:过度 TV viewing 确实与严重 health risks 相关,但现有研究尚不能断言它必然比 reading 等所有其他久坐活动造成更高风险。

    抓住作者承认的比较缺口
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

3 道逐段细节自检题

针对2015年6月英语四级真题第2套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 couch potato

    What does recent research indicate about being a couch potato?

    • A It has been proved harmless when limited to five hours a day.
    • B Sitting passively is the only cause of obesity.
    • C The specific extent of its harm has been measured.
    • D Most people spend ten hours a day watching TV.
    • E It is the only pleasure available to modern Americans.
    • F Working and sleeping cause more disease than watching TV.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    原文指出研究者已经 quantified just how harmful 这种状态可能是。正确项以 has been measured 改写 quantified,并以 the specific extent of its harm 对应 just how harmful,属于保持事实范围和可能性边界的同义转述。

    固定短语直达研究动作 以题干中的 couch potato 为唯一 lexical anchor,直接扫描到 第1段 的末句,再只提取 research action 与 harm 之间的关系。随后跳过背景数据,在选项中寻找能够改写该 research action 且不扩大因果范围的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 knitting

    Why may TV viewing promote unhealthy habits more effectively than a sedentary activity such as knitting?

    • A Knitting has been proved to increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
    • B Channel surfing helps reduce the risk of heart disease.
    • C People consume more beer while knitting than while watching TV.
    • D It occupies exceptionally large amounts of time and exposes viewers to ads that may encourage unhealthy consumption.
    • E The analysis followed all participants for fifty years.
    • F TV advertisements encourage viewers to take more physical exercise.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项整合了两个并列事实:观看电视所占时间 dwarfs 其他活动,而 beer and popcorn ads 可能促使观众 consume them。occupies exceptionally large amounts of time 和 may encourage unhealthy consumption 分别完成了准确的概括与同义改写。

    比较句后双要点匹配 先用 knitting 直达 第2段 的比较句,然后只读取该比较后的解释信息,不处理前面的多组风险百分比。把解释压缩成 time 与 ads 两个 semantic tags,再选择同时覆盖这两个标签且保留 may 语气的正确项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 authors

    What limitation do the authors acknowledge in the analysis?

    • A It ignored the possible link between TV viewing and heart disease.
    • B It focused exclusively on Type 2 diabetes.
    • C It used data from only one small previous study.
    • D It concluded that reading is as harmful as watching TV.
    • E It did not compare TV watching with other sedentary activities, such as reading.
    • F Its participants were mostly children and teenagers.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    原文明确说明研究者 didn't compare different sedentary activities,以判断 TV watching 相对于 reading 等活动是否对应更高风险。正确项保留了 did not compare 的否定逻辑,也准确概括了 comparison objects。

    主体后否定结构匹配 利用 authors 在 第3段 中的唯一出现快速定位,再抓取其后的 negative verb 和 comparison structure。判题时不回顾全部疾病数据,只检查哪个正确项完整保留了“未进行某项比较”的逻辑及正确的比较对象。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的说明文骨架

按说明文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引出话题:看电视的普遍性与健康危害

    这个 opening paragraph 首先指出 TV watching 是 the most common everyday activity,接着 transition 到 health concerns,最后用 researchers have now quantified 引出具体的 harmful effects,形成了从 phenomenon 到 problem 的 logical progression。

    这个 introductory segment 通过描述 watching TV 作为 guilty pleasure 和 common activity 的 paradox,为后文的 health risks quantification 做好 contextual setup,让读者理解为什么需要 research this topic。

    引出研究对象
  2. 详述研究发现:看电视的具体健康风险

    这个 body paragraph 通过 Harvard-led study 的 specific data 来 substantiate 前面提到的 harm,列举了 Type 2 diabetes、heart disease、premature death 的 percentage increases,并进一步 explain 为什么 TV viewing 比 other sedentary activities 更 harmful,形成了 evidence-based argumentation。

    这个 evidence section 是 expository article 的 core component,它用 quantified results 和 comparative analysis 来 validate 主旨中的 'significantly raises likelihood' 这一 claim,让 argument 从 abstract statement 变成 concrete reality。

    提供核心证据
  3. 承认研究局限:缺乏对比分析

    这个 concluding paragraph 通过 'Even so' 和 'admit' 这些 concessive signals 来 acknowledge the limitation,指出 researchers 没有 compare TV watching 和 other sedentary activities(如 reading)的 differential risks,体现了 scientific rigor 和 balanced perspective。

    这个 qualification section 在 expository writing 中起到 maintain credibility 的作用,它通过 acknowledging limitations 来 demonstrate objectivity,同时也 implicitly suggest 需要 further research,让整个 argument 更 nuanced and trustworthy。

    补充研究边界
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首句抓主题 P1

    说明文的 first sentence 往往直接引出 the subject matter,这里通过 guilty pleasure 和 most common activity 的表述,明确了文章要讨论的 phenomenon 是电视观看行为,为后续的 health risks explanation 奠定基础。

  2. 段尾找态度 P1

    说明文在引入 topic 后会迅速表明 explanatory direction,这里通过 harmful 和 quantified 的搭配,揭示了文章不是中性描述而是要 explain the degree of harm,这种 evaluative stance 直接指向主旨中的 health risks 部分。

  3. 主体段找证据 P2

    说明文的 body paragraphs 通过 concrete evidence 来 support the main idea,这里密集出现的 numerical data 和 medical terms 不是随意堆砌,而是系统性地 demonstrate how harmful TV viewing is,这种 evidence pattern 直接对应主旨中的 increases health risks 和 serious health consequences。

  4. 整合形成主旨 P1 P2 P3

    说明文主旨的 complete grasp 需要整合 topic identification、attitude detection 和 evidence confirmation 三个层面。这篇文章的 linear structure(引入现象→提出危害→数据支撑→小幅让步)典型地 demonstrates expository writing 的 progression logic,最终 main idea 是解释 TV viewing 与 health consequences 的 causal relationship。

主旨信号词 harmful P1 risk P2 quantified P1 rose P2 linked to P2

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

这篇说明文阐释了过度看电视如何增加健康风险。研究表明,每天看两小时电视会显著提高患2型糖尿病、心脏病和过早死亡的可能性,将久坐行为与严重健康后果联系起来。
This expository article explains how excessive TV viewing increases health risks. Research shows that watching TV for two hours daily significantly raises the likelihood of Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and premature death, linking sedentary behavior to serious health consequences.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • quantify 用数字精确测量或表达

    让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,从 context 的角度,我们看到从 'we know it's harmful' 到 'specific percentages' 的演进,这个 transition 需要一个表达 '精确化' 的动词。其次,从 word formation 来看,quant- 词根携带 'quantity' 的基因,-ify 后缀赋予它 'make into' 的动作性。最后,从 academic discourse 的角度,scientific research 的本质就是把 subjective observations 转化为 objective measurements。三条线索共同指向同一个方向:这个词表达的是 '将某事物转化为可以用数字衡量的形式'。

    科学语境下的转化型动词推断法
  • dwarf 使显得矮小或微不足道

    综合三条 clues:首先,sentence structure 显示这是一个 A compared to B 的结构,且强调 A 的 sheer number,暗示 A overwhelms B。其次,从 word origin 看,dwarf 作为名词的 size implication 在动词用法中被保留,表达一种 make something look small 的关系。最后,从 rhetorical purpose 分析,作者需要一个强有力的动词来 support 'TV is especially harmful' 这个 argument,而 '使其他活动显得微不足道' 正是这种 emphatic comparison 所需要的表达。三条线索converge到同一个含义:使某物显得很小或不重要。

    名转动的隐喻推理与修辞意图分析
  • sedentary 久坐的、缺乏身体活动的

    把三条 clues 整合:从 context 看,sedentary activities 出现在讨论 lack of physical exercise 的 paragraph,且与 health risks 相关联,说明这类 activities 的 defining feature 是 not physically active。从 morphology 看,sed- 词根直接指向 sitting 这个 posture。从 categorization 看,TV watching 和 knitting 被归为同类,它们的 shared trait 是 require little movement。三条线索 triangulate 到一个核心特征:involving sitting and little physical movement。

    类别归纳法与词根物理动作还原
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 列数字

    P1 P2

    文章通过 precise numerical data 来 establish credibility 和 demonstrate severity。Americans view five hours of TV each day 这个数据直接 quantifies 日常观看量;every two hours per day 对应的 20% diabetes risk increase、15% heart disease risk increase、13% premature death risk increase 这些百分比数据,combined with specific time periods like 8.5 years、a decade、seven-year follow-up,构成了一个 comprehensive statistical framework。这些 concrete numbers 让 abstract health risks 变得 tangible and alarming,强化了文章 warning against excessive TV viewing 的主旨,使读者能够 grasp the magnitude of the problem immediately。

    信号词 five hours every two hours 20% 15% 13% 8.5 years a decade seven-year

    仿写: 在写作 health-related 或 scientific expository articles 时,先 identify the key claim 你想 establish,然后 search for statistical evidence 来 support it。注意 combine percentages with time frames 来增强 specificity,比如不要只说 "increases risk",而要说 "increases risk by X% over Y years"。模版:【主题行为/现象】+ specific quantity/frequency + leads to/correlates with + percentage increase/decrease + over + time period。例如:"Consuming sugary drinks daily (over 500ml) raises obesity risk by 30% over five years among adolescents."

  • 举例子

    P2 P3

    文章使用 concrete examples 来 illustrate abstract concepts。Type 2 diabetes、heart disease、premature death 这三个 specific health conditions 作为 examples of health outcomes;beer and popcorn 作为 examples of products in TV ads;knitting 和 reading 作为 examples of other sedentary activities。这些 tangible examples 让 general statement "unhealthy habits" 和 "sedentary activities" 变得 specific and relatable。特别是 beer and popcorn example 直接 connects TV viewing to consumption behavior,为文章 TV watching is especially harmful 的观点提供了 concrete illustration,使主旨更加 convincing and memorable。

    信号词 like such as for example for instance including

    仿写: 写作时,每当 introduce an abstract concept 或 make a general claim,立即 follow up with specific examples。选择 examples 时要 consider reader familiarity——pick instances your audience can easily visualize or relate to。注意使用 transitional phrases 来 introduce examples smoothly。模版:【抽象概念/一般性陈述】+ for example/such as/like + specific instance A, B, and C。或者:【一般性结论】+ 【具体案例描述】+ may/can + 【回扣到一般性结论】。例如:"Social media affects mental health. For instance, excessive Instagram use correlates with increased anxiety among teenagers, while constant Twitter engagement disrupts sleep patterns."

  • 作比较

    P2 P3

    文章通过 comparative analysis 来 highlight TV viewing's unique harm。Compared with other sedentary activities, like knitting 这个 explicit comparison 将 TV watching 与 other passive behaviors 对比;watching TV may be especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits 强调了 TV viewing 的 distinctive negative impact。虽然作者在 第3段 承认 didn't compare different sedentary activities quantitatively,但 comparative framework 已经建立。这种 comparison strategy 服务于文章主旨,通过 positioning TV viewing as more harmful than similar activities,reinforces the urgency of addressing this specific behavior,而不是 all sedentary habits equally。

    信号词 compared with compared to unlike more than less than rather than while whereas

    仿写: 运用 comparison 时,先 identify what you want to emphasize,然后 select a contrasting reference point that readers can relate to。使用 comparative structures like "compared with/to"、"unlike"、"more/less...than"。注意不要 only state the comparison,要 explain why the difference matters。模版:【主体 A】+ compared with/unlike + 【对照体 B】+ may be especially/particularly + 【关键差异点】+ because/as + 【原因阐释】。例如:"Compared with traditional studying, active recall practice may be especially effective at improving long-term retention because it forces the brain to retrieve rather than passively review information."

  • 引资料

    P2 P3

    文章通过 citing authoritative sources 来 establish credibility and support claims。In an analysis of data from eight large previously published studies 明确指出 data source;a Harvard-led group reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association 提供了 specific research institution and publication venue;other studies have found 引用 additional research evidence。这些 citations 为文章的 health risk claims 提供了 scientific backing,让 argument 从 personal opinion 转变为 evidence-based analysis。特别是 mentioning Harvard 和 JAMA 这样的 prestigious sources 极大增强了 authority,使读者更容易 accept the alarming statistics presented,从而 strongly supports the article's warning message about excessive TV viewing。

    信号词 reported in according to studies show research indicates found in published in data from evidence from

    仿写: 使用 citation 时要 balance specificity and readability。Include key identifiers:【研究主体/机构】+ 【动词如 reported/found/showed】+ in/according to + 【出版物/期刊】。对于 particularly important claims,mention both the source's prestige (Harvard-led、renowned) 和 methodological rigor (eight large studies、comprehensive analysis)。避免 vague references like "studies show"——要 provide enough detail so readers can verify,但不要 overwhelm with full citations in body text。模版:In 【研究描述】, 【机构/研究者】+ reported/found in 【期刊/出版物】that + 【研究发现】。例如:"In a comprehensive analysis of 50,000 participants, Stanford researchers reported in Nature Medicine that intermittent fasting reduced inflammatory markers by 25% over six months."

  • 下定义

    P1 P2

    文章通过 defining key terms 来 ensure reader understanding。sedentary(久坐的) activities 这个 parenthetical definition 直接解释了 technical term;couch potato 这个 colloquial expression 被 contextually defined as someone who spends excessive time watching TV passively。虽然 obesity、Type 2 diabetes、heart disease 等 medical terms 没有 explicit definitions,但通过 describing their connection to sedentary behavior,文章 implicitly clarifies their nature as health conditions linked to inactivity。这些 definitional elements 确保 diverse readers (包括 non-medical backgrounds) 能够 grasp the concepts being discussed,使文章的 health warning message accessible to a broader audience,从而 effectively communicate the main thesis about TV viewing dangers。

    信号词 which means refers to defined as known as that is in other words namely

    仿写: 在说明文中 incorporate definitions 时,判断 which terms need clarification based on your target audience。对于 technical terms,可使用 parenthetical definitions (term(定义)) 或 appositive structures (term, which means...)。对于 colloquial expressions,通过 context clues 让 meaning emerge naturally。避免 over-defining common terms,但不要 assume readers know specialized vocabulary。模版:【术语】(【简洁中文或英文解释】) 或 【术语】, which refers to 【说明性描述】, + 【继续阐述】。例如:"Cognitive load, which refers to the mental effort required to process information, significantly impacts learning efficiency, especially when students encounter multiple complex concepts simultaneously."

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 看电视是guilty pleasure暗示其负面性

    P1
    It's our guilty pleasure: Watching TV is the most common everyday activity

    委婉表达 guilty pleasure indulgence vice weakness comfort food necessary evil unfortunate reality

    "Guilty pleasure" 这个 phrase 表面上 acknowledges TV watching 作为一种 enjoyable activity,但 "guilty" 这个 adjective 已经 embedded 了 moral judgment 和 negative implication。言外之意是:虽然我们都 enjoy watching TV,但我们 subconsciously know 这是 something we should feel bad about。这为整篇文章的 critical tone 和后续的 health warnings 做了 铺垫,让读者在 psychologically 上 prepared to accept 负面的 research findings。它 serves 文章主旨,因为从 opening 就 plant 了"TV viewing is problematic" 这个 seed,使后面的 quantified health risks 显得 logical 和 expected,而不是 突兀的 accusation。

  • 被动的sitting引出真正危害不只是久坐本身

    P1
    spending so much time sitting passively can lead to obesity and other diseases

    模糊限制语 passively merely simply just only particularly especially

    "Passively" 这个 adverb 不只是 describe sitting 的 physical state,它 implies 了一种 mental and behavioral dimension。言外之意是:TV watching 的 harm 不仅仅来自 physical inactivity,还来自 passive mental state 和缺乏 active engagement。这 prepares readers for 第2段 中关于 TV watching being "especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits" 的 argument。它 contributes to 文章主旨,因为 establishes that the problem is multifaceted——不只是 sedentary behavior,还有 TV viewing 特有的 passive consumption mode,这使得 watching TV potentially worse than other sedentary activities。这个 subtle distinction supports 文章后面将 TV viewing singled out as particularly harmful 的 logic。

  • 量化harmful暗示之前认知不够充分

    P1
    researchers have now quantified just how harmful being a couch potato can be

    时间标记词 now quantified now recently finally at last for the first time newly

    "Now quantified" 这个 phrase 的言外之意是:虽然我们之前 generally knew TV watching was harmful,但 lacked precise data。"Now" 这个 temporal marker implies 我们之前处于 relative ignorance 或 vague awareness,而现在终于有了 concrete numbers。这 serves multiple purposes for 文章主旨:首先,它 justifies why this article exists——这是 new, more specific information;其次,它 adds credibility 和 urgency,因为 quantified data is more compelling than general warnings;最后,它 sets up 读者对接下来 specific statistics 的 expectation。这个 subtle implication makes 后面提到的 "20% risk increase", "15% risk increase" 等 numbers seem more significant and newsworthy。

  • But转折强调看电视比其他久坐活动更危险

    P2
    All of these outcomes are linked to a lack of physical exercise. But compared with other sedentary activities, like knitting, viewing TV may be especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits.

    转折类 But but however yet nevertheless nonetheless still

    这个 "But" 的言外之意非常 significant:作者先 acknowledge 表面上的 common explanation (缺乏 physical exercise),然后用 "But" 来 pivot to 文章的 real argument——TV watching has unique properties that make it worse than other sedentary activities。言外之意是:不要被 obvious answer 满足,the real story is more specific and concerning。"May be especially effective" 这个 hedged statement 实际上是在 carefully assert TV's distinctive harm。这 directly serves 文章主旨,因为它 distinguishes the article from merely saying "sitting is bad"——它 argues TV watching is a特别 problematic form of sedentary behavior。这个转折 establishes 文章的 unique angle and justifies why TV viewing deserves special attention among all sedentary activities。

  • may暗示证据尚不完全确凿但倾向支持

    P2
    viewing TV may be especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits

    情态词 may might could would can should possibly

    "May" 的言外之意是:虽然作者用了 tentative language,但 based on available evidence,他们 strongly believe TV viewing is particularly harmful。这个 modal 不是表达真正的 doubt,而是 maintaining academic credibility and avoiding overstatement。它 signals 到读者:"我们有 good reason to believe this,但作为 responsible researchers,我们 acknowledge 需要 more definitive proof。" 这 serves 文章主旨 by balancing scientific rigor with clear communication of risk。它让 subsequent explanations ("sheer number of hours", "watching ads") seem like reasonable hypotheses rather than proven facts,which actually makes them more persuasive because they appear measured and thoughtful rather than alarmist。

  • admit承认表明研究存在局限性

    P3
    Even so, the authors admit that they didn't compare different sedentary activities to determine whether TV watching was linked to a greater risk

    让步类 admit acknowledge concede grant recognize accept even so

    "Admit" 这个 verb 的言外之意是:作者 consciously chose to acknowledge this limitation,which means they're being transparent and scientifically honest。言外之意不是 "our study is flawed and you should doubt it",而是 "we're confident enough in our findings to openly discuss what we didn't examine。" 这个 admission actually serves 文章主旨 by building reader trust。当作者 frankly state they didn't directly compare TV to reading or knitting,读者更 likely to believe 他们关于 TV's harm 的其他 claims。这种 intellectual honesty also subtly suggests future research directions while keeping the article's main message intact:即使没有 direct comparison,the evidence for TV's harmful effects remains compelling based on the mechanisms described ("sheer number of hours", ad exposure)。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:消极批判

结论先行:本文作者态度为消极批判( concerned and cautionary)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇定调词识别 P1

    说明文的 topic focus 往往在 opening paragraph 就会 establish,guilty pleasure 这个 phrase 本身就带有 self-criticism 的意味,说明 author 认为这个 activity 有问题,这是判断 attitude 的第一个 signal

  2. 数据倾向性呈现 P2

    说明文常用 statistics 来支持观点,但 author's attitude 体现在他如何 frame 这些数据。这里 author 连续列举三个 increasing risks,没有提及任何 potential benefits 或 mitigating factors,这种 one-sided presentation 表明 critical stance

  3. 比较语言强化度 P2

    说明文中的 comparative language 揭示 author 对不同 subjects 的 relative judgment。especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits 和 dwarfs the time 这些表达不是 neutral comparison,而是在 highlight TV watching 的特殊危害性,reinforcing critical attitude

  4. 让步段落权重 P3

    说明文中的 concession 段落(用 however、even so、admittedly 引导)可能 soften attitude,但要看 concession 的 weight。这里 author 用 admit 承认 didn't compare activities,但这个 limitation 只占一小段,且用 even so 来 transition,表明这不改变主要 conclusion,overall attitude 依然是 concerned

  5. 全文论证方向 P1 P2 P3

    说明文的 author attitude 需要综合 opening tone、data framing、comparative language、以及 concession handling 来判断。这篇文章的每个 section 都在 reinforce 同一个 message:TV watching is harmful,没有任何 section 试图 defend 或 minimize 这个 harm,因此 overall attitude 是 clearly concerned and cautionary

文中的态度信号词

  • guilty pleasure P1

    这个 phrase 在 opening sentence 就 establish 了 negative moral judgment,guilty 表明 author 认为这个 activity 是 morally questionable 或 harmful 的,为整篇文章的 critical tone 定下基调

    同类词 guilty secret shameful indulgence regrettable habit problematic behavior unhealthy obsession

  • harmful P1

    Harmful 是直接的 negative evaluative adjective,明确表达 author 认为 TV watching 对 health 有 negative impact,这种 explicit judgment word 直接揭示 critical attitude

    同类词 damaging detrimental destructive dangerous hazardous

  • couch potato P1

    Couch potato 是带有 derogatory connotation 的 informal term,author 用这个 colloquialism 来 characterize TV watchers,暗示 criticism 和 disapproval,比 neutral term(TV viewer)更具 negative judgment

    同类词 lazy viewer passive watcher sedentary person inactive individual idle spectator

  • rose/increased/climbed P2

    这三个 verbs 在描述 health risks 时营造 alarming tone,相比 neutral verbs(showed、was associated with),这些 motion verbs emphasize upward movement 和 severity,强化 author 对 risks 的 concern

    同类词 rose increased climbed surged soared

  • especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits P2

    Especially effective 强调 TV watching 在 promoting unhealthy habits 方面的特殊性,这个 intensifying phrase 配合 negative outcome(unhealthy habits),表明 author 认为 TV watching 比其他 activities 更 problematic

    同类词 especially effective particularly prone to uniquely suited for remarkably efficient at notably capable of

  • dwarfs P2

    Dwarfs 是 hyperbolic verb,表示 TV watching time 远远超过其他 activities,这个 exaggeration 强化了 author 对 excessive TV watching 的 concern,比 neutral verb(exceeds)更具 critical tone

    同类词 overwhelms eclipses overshadows dominates surpasses

  • admit P3

    Admit 暗示 authors 不情愿地承认 limitation,这个 verb 带有 reluctance 的 connotation,表明即使在 acknowledging weakness,author 也不想 undermine 主要的 critical message

    同类词 acknowledge concede confess grant recognize reluctantly

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇说明文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇说明文?

  1. 首句功能识别 P1

    说明文的 opening 通常会 describe a common situation 或 introduce a subject to explain,比如这里的 'watching TV is the most common everyday activity',这是在 presenting a widespread phenomenon。议论文会直接 state a viewpoint 比如 'TV watching should be limited',新闻报道会用 breaking news lead 比如 'A new study released today shows'。

  2. 科研数据呈现 P2

    说明文会 present scientific data 和 research results 来 explain phenomena,比如 'a Harvard-led group reported' 和 'the risk rose 20%' 这些是 objective evidence。议论文虽然也用 evidence,但目的是 to support the author's argument,而新闻报道 focuses on what happened 而不是 why it happens scientifically。

  3. 作者立场中立性 P3

    说明文的 tone 是 neutral and informative,作者 presents information objectively,比如 'the authors admit that they didn't compare' 显示 scientific caution 而不是 personal advocacy。议论文的 author 会 express strong opinions 和 call for actions,新闻的 reporter 会 maintain journalistic objectivity 但 focus on timeliness。

  4. 解释性结构模式 P1 P2 P3

    本文 structure 清晰体现说明文特征:第1段 introduces the topic of TV watching habits,第2段 explains the health risks with research data,第3段 acknowledges research limitations。这是典型的 expository pattern。议论文会用 claim → support → refutation → conclusion 的 argumentative structure,新闻会用 inverted pyramid 的 news structure。

哪些词暴露了说明文体裁?

  • quantified P1 科学研究方法词 measured calculated analyzed examined investigated
  • analysis of data P2 数据分析框架词 statistical analysis data examination research findings study results empirical evidence
  • rose 20% P2 精确数据表述词 increased 15% climbed 13% dropped by 30% doubled in size tripled over time
  • All of these outcomes are linked to P2 因果关系阐释词 are linked to are caused by result from lead to contribute to
  • may be especially effective at promoting P2 机制功能描述词 may be especially effective at functions to serves to works by operates through
  • For one P2 说明顺序标记词 First Second Additionally Furthermore Moreover
  • other studies have found that P2 研究引证词 studies have found research shows evidence suggests experiments demonstrate investigations reveal
  • the authors admit that P3 研究局限性说明词 authors admit researchers acknowledge the study has limitations it should be noted however, there are constraints
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

2 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 的常见问题

2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章的主旨是什么?
2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章说明文阐释了过度看电视如何增加健康风险。研究表明,每天看两小时电视会显著提高患2型糖尿病、心脏病和过早死亡的可能性,将久坐行为与严重健康后果联系起来。(英文表述:This expository article explains how excessive TV viewing increases health risks. Research shows that watching TV for two hours daily significantly raises the likelihood of Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and premature death, linking sedentary behavior to serious health consequences.)
2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为说明文,作者立场是消极批判(concerned and cautionary)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 237 词、3 段;在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 163 篇(占 32%)。
2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 3 段按说明文骨架分为 3 个意群:第1段——引出话题:看电视的普遍性与健康危害;第2段——详述研究发现:看电视的具体健康风险;第3段——承认研究局限:缺乏对比分析。
2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是消极批判(concerned and cautionary)。判断路径:开篇定调词识别 → 数据倾向性呈现 → 比较语言强化度 → 让步段落权重 → 全文论证方向;文中的态度信号词包括 guilty pleasure(第1段)、harmful(第1段)、couch potato(第1段)、rose/increased/climbed(第2段)、especially effective at promoting unhealthy habits(第2段)、dwarfs(第2段)、admit(第3段)。
2015年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part III Section A 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 3 个:quantify(用数字精确测量或表达)、dwarf(使显得矮小或微不足道)、sedentary(久坐的、缺乏身体活动的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: