2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章是什么体裁？难度如何？

体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B1，全文 288 词、7 段；在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中，B1 级共 113 篇（占 22%）。

2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的？

全文 7 段按对话骨架分为 6 个意群：第1段、第2段——询问Jimmy近况；第3段——说明寻找Jimmy的原因；第4段——提供另一寻找者信息；第5段——详述借款具体情况；第6段——质疑借款理由合理性；第7段——承认疑虑但维护信任。

2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词？

按文中出现顺序共 3 个：pushy（强势的、咄咄逼人的、爱指使他人的）、fuss（大惊小怪、小题大做、闹腾）、vague（模糊的、不清楚的、含糊的），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1)

CET-4 · 来自 2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 · Part II Section B (1) · 听力

2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 288 词、7 段，CEFR 难度 B1（B1 级在英语四级文章中占 22%）；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

7 段英文原文

以下为2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 的听力原文，由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录，共 7 段。左侧 P1–P7 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

M: Has Jimmy been coming in lately?

W: No, I haven't seen him around. Why? Has he been causing any trouble?

M: Not that I know of. But I need to see him, because my friends and I lent him some money last month. We haven't heard from him since. I heard he comes here a lot, so I thought I'd come in and check with you.

W: Well, that's funny. Some other fellow came in asking for Jimmy just yesterday, a real nervous, pushy type of fellow, saying he needed Jimmy for some study project they were working on. But I can't quite remember what it was all about. Is this a lot of money we're talking about here?

M: No, just 60 pounds between the three of us, but still a bit too much to just let go. He told us he'd got into an accident. Nothing serious, mind you, but he damaged someone's car and wanted to get some money together to make up for the damage he'd caused.

W: Hmm, isn't that sort of thing usually covered by insurance? And then, if you still wanted to give money as some sort of apology or something, he probably shouldn't have to go around borrowing it from people.

M: You think Jimmy's just making it all up? See, I did think it was a bit weird for him to be asking for money for that sort of thing. And his story was a bit vague to begin with. But I thought maybe he doesn't want his parents to know about what happened. So he'd rather come to us and keep things quiet. Anyway, Jimmy is a good guy. So we didn't make a fuss about it.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的对话骨架

按对话的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

P1 P2

询问Jimmy近况

男士 initiate conversation 询问 Jimmy 是否 lately 来过这里，女士回应说 haven't seen him around 并反问原因，这是 dialogue opening 的典型 pattern，通过 inquiry 引出话题。

这个 opening exchange 建立了 searching for Jimmy 的基本 situation，为后续揭示 borrowing money 的 core issue 做铺垫，属于对话中的 topic introduction phase。
引出寻人线索
P3

说明寻找Jimmy的原因

男士 elaborate on 寻找 Jimmy 的 reason，解释说 lent him money last month 但之后 haven't heard from him，因为听说 Jimmy frequently comes here 所以来 check，这是对前面 inquiry 的 direct explanation。

这个 explanation 首次 reveal 了 money lending 这个 central issue，establish 了男士作为 creditor 的 role，为后续 suspicion 的产生提供 factual basis，是对话的 information disclosure phase。
揭示借款事实
P4

提供另一寻找者信息

女士回应说 that's funny，mention 昨天也有 another fellow 来找 Jimmy，describe 这人 nervous and pushy，说是为了 study project，但她 can't quite remember details，然后 inquire 借款的 amount。

这个 information sharing 是 suspicion 产生的 turning point，parallel case 的 emergence 暗示 Jimmy 可能向 multiple people 借钱，女士的 funny 和 question about amount 都在 hint at potential problem，推动对话进入 doubt phase。
引入疑点线索
P5

详述借款具体情况

男士 specify 借了 60 pounds between three people，虽然 not a lot 但 too much to let go，然后 explain Jimmy 的说法是 got into accident，damaged someone's car，需要 money 来 make up for damage。

这个 detailed account 提供了 Jimmy's story 的 complete version，establish 了 accident narrative 作为 borrowing 的 justification，为接下来女士的 logical questioning 提供 target，是对话中 evidence presentation 的环节。
说明借款缘由
P6

质疑借款理由合理性

女士直接 challenge the logic，指出这种 thing usually covered by insurance，而且即使要 give money as apology，也 shouldn't go around borrowing from people，这是 rational questioning 直指 story 的 inconsistency。

女士的 logical analysis 是 suspicion 从 implicit 到 explicit 的关键转折，通过 common sense reasoning 戳穿 story 的 unreasonableness，引导男士开始 reflect 和 doubt，推动对话进入 critical evaluation phase。
揭示故事漏洞
P7

承认疑虑但维护信任

男士被女士的 questioning 触动，admit 自己也觉得 a bit weird 和 story was vague，但 rationalize 说可能 Jimmy doesn't want parents to know，所以 come to friends，最后 defend Jimmy 说他是 good guy 所以 didn't make fuss，体现 internal conflict between doubt and trust。

这个 conflicted response 完成了男士从 naive lender 到 suspicious creditor 的 transformation，acknowledge doubts 的同时 still cling to trust，这种 ambivalence 是对话的 psychological climax，implicit confirm 了 Jimmy 可能在 fabricating story to borrow from multiple sources 的 suspicion。
确认怀疑萌生

MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2021年6月英语四级真题第2套这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

抓对话发起者目的 P1 P3

对话类文章的 main topic 往往由 the person who initiates the conversation 的 purpose 决定。这个 man 的 seeking behavior 就是整个对话的 driving force，后续所有的 dialogue development 都围绕这个 central purpose 展开。
捕捉矛盾信息点 P4

对话类文章如果只是 simple question-and-answer 就不会成为考试材料。真正的 main idea 往往在 complications 或 conflicting information 中显现。这里 another person also looking for Jimmy 就是一个 major clue，暗示事情不简单。
识别质疑性提问 P6

当对话中一方开始 question the logic 或 reasonableness of something 时，这往往指向文章的 deeper meaning。这里女士的 questioning 把焦点从 simple money lending 转移到 potential deception，这才是文章真正要 convey 的 theme。
找认知转变标记 P7

对话的 climax 往往在一方 suddenly realizes or voices a suspicion 的时刻。这个 moment of awareness 通常就是文章要传达的 central message。男士从 initially trusting 到 beginning to doubt 的 transformation 正是 the whole conversation 的 intended outcome。
串联对话发展线 P1 P3 P4 P6 P7

对话类文章的 theme 不是静态的 statement，而是一个 dynamic process of discovery。The main idea 往往是 by the end of the conversation what has been revealed or realized。这篇对话从 simple inquiry 发展到 potential fraud suspicion，这个 narrative arc 本身就是 the core message。

主旨信号词 lent him some money P3 funny P4 nervous, pushy type P4 isn't that sort of thing usually covered by insurance P6 making it all up P7 vague P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

一名男子在Jimmy常去的地方寻找他,想追回借给他用于修车的60英镑。女子提到另有人也在找Jimmy,这引发了怀疑:Jimmy可能编造了车祸故事,向多人借钱。

A man searches for Jimmy at a place he frequents to recover 60 pounds lent for alleged car damage repairs. The woman's account of another person seeking Jimmy raises suspicions that Jimmy may have fabricated the accident story to borrow money from multiple people.

WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

pushy 强势的、咄咄逼人的、爱指使他人的

让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,pushy 和 nervous 并列出现,而 nervous 是明确的 negative trait,所以 pushy 也应该是 negative 的。其次,从 morphology 角度,'push' + '-y' 的结构告诉我们这是在描述一个具有 pushing behavior 的人。最后,女士对这个 pushy fellow 的 suspicious tone 再次确认了这是一个 undesirable characteristic。综合这三条 evidence,我们可以推断出 pushy 指的是那种过分强势、aggressive、不顾他人感受强行要求的行为特征。

并列定位+词根拆解+态度验证
fuss 大惊小怪、小题大做、闹腾

让我们整合这些 clues。Sentence structure 告诉我们 'didn't make a fuss' 是一个 deliberate choice,意味着 make a fuss 是一个 alternative action。Logical relationship 显示这个 action 与 trust Jimmy 相对立,暗示它是某种 skeptical 或 confrontational behavior。Context 进一步确认,面对 suspicious story,他们本可以 make a fuss(追问、质疑、要求解释),但因为信任而选择不这么做。因此,make a fuss 指的是小题大做、大惊小怪、或因某事而制造麻烦、引发 conflict 的 behavior。

句式+逻辑+对比三维推理
vague 模糊的、不清楚的、含糊的

综合以上 clues,我们可以构建完整的 inference chain。首先,'to begin with' 告诉我们 vague 是 story 的 initial characteristic,不是后来才出现的。其次,vague 与 weird 并列使用来质疑 Jimmy 的 credibility,说明它描述的是 story 的某种 weakness。最后,Jimmy 的 story 本身确实 lacks crucial details(accident specifics, insurance situation, exact amount needed),这种 lack of clarity and specifics 正是 vague 所描述的状态。因此,vague 指的是模糊的、不清楚的、缺乏细节的。

对象分析+词语对照+事实验证

RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

反问
P2

在第2段中，女服务员用反问句 "Why? Has he been causing any trouble?" 来回应男生的询问。这个rhetorical question不是真的在问trouble的情况，而是表达她的curiosity和slight concern。这种反问手法让dialogue显得更natural，同时也subtly暗示Jimmy可能有些questionable behavior，为后文揭示他可能在fabricating stories埋下伏笔，推动了文章主旨中关于suspicion的发展。

信号词 Why Really Seriously You think Don't you think Isn't it Shouldn't How come

仿写： 在写作dialogue时，当你想让character表达concern或者skepticism时，不要直接说 "I'm worried"，而是可以用反问来add nuance。比如角色听到某人失踪了，与其说 "That's strange"，可以仿写成 "Really? Has something happened to him?"。模版："[重复对方关键信息]? [用疑问句表达潜在担忧或质疑]?" 例如："He needs money? Is he in some kind of trouble?"
反问
P6

在第6段中，女服务员用 "Hmm, isn't that sort of thing usually covered by insurance?" 这个反问来质疑Jimmy的story。这不是genuine question，而是通过反问指出logical flaw。紧接着的conditional statement进一步reinforce她的skepticism。这个修辞手法直接contributes到主旨，因为它explicitly raises doubts about Jimmy's credibility，帮助男生意识到可能被deceived，是suspicion escalation的关键turning point。

信号词 isn't shouldn't wouldn't doesn't aren't wasn't couldn't

仿写： 当想让character指出logical inconsistency时，用 "Isn't... usually...?" 或 "Shouldn't...?" 的pattern来challenge对方的narrative。比如听到可疑的excuse，可以仿写成 "Isn't that kind of expense usually handled by the company?" 或 "Shouldn't he have contacted you by now if it was urgent?"。模版："Isn't [某种情况] usually [常规处理方式]?" 这能politely但firmly地express doubt。
语气词
P4 P6 P7

在第4段中出现 "Well, that's funny"，第6段开头的 "Hmm"，以及第7段中的 "See" 这些interjections。这些discourse markers让dialogue听起来spontaneous和conversational。特别是 "Well, that's funny" 中的funny不是真的amusing，而是表达 "strange" 或 "suspicious"，这个subtle shift in meaning配合语气词Well，帮助convey女服务员growing suspicion的态度，与主旨中reveal Jimmy可能在deceiving people的narrative紧密相关。

信号词 Well Hmm See Look Now So Oh Ah You know

仿写： 在dialogue开头用语气词可以create realistic hesitation或thinking process。比如character在organizing thoughts时用 "Well..."，在recall信息时用 "Hmm..."，在emphasize observation时用 "See..."。仿写模版："[语气词], [观察或判断]"。例如："Well, that doesn't quite add up" 或 "Hmm, I remember him saying something different"。这让character显得在actively processing information而不是机械回应。
省略
P5

在第5段中，"Nothing serious, mind you" 这个parenthetical remark使用了elliptical structure，完整表达应该是 "It was nothing serious, mind you" 或 "Nothing serious happened"。这种省略make speech更concise和colloquial，同时也reflect男生试图downplay situation的psychological state。他在justify为什么lend money时使用这种casual、省略的表达，ironically暗示他其实对这个story有些uncertain，这subtle cue与文章主旨中男生开始doubt Jimmy的credibility形成呼应。

信号词 mind you you see you know I mean that is anyway

仿写： 在对话中表达supplementary information时，可以用elliptical phrases来add details without disrupting flow。比如描述情况时插入 "[形容词/副词], mind you" 或者直接用noun phrase作为sentence fragment。仿写模版："[主要陈述]. [省略主谓的补充说明], mind you/you see/you know." 例如："He seemed confident. Too confident, if you ask me." 或 "The story checked out. Mostly, anyway."
反问
P7

在第7段中，男生说 "You think Jimmy's just making it all up?" 这是self-reflective rhetorical question，他不是真的询问女服务员的opinion，而是在verbalize自己internal doubt。这个question实际是acknowledgment，表明他开始seriously consider possibility that Jimmy是dishonest。这个修辞转折perfectly aligns with文章主旨，标志着protagonist从initially trusting转变为questioning Jimmy's credibility的critical moment。

信号词 You think You mean You're saying Are you telling me So you're suggesting You believe

仿写： 当character需要express dawning realization或self-doubt时，用 "You think [某个可能性]?" 的pattern。这比直接说 "Maybe..." 更能show character在actively process information。仿写模版："You think [主语] [可能的行为/状态]?" 例如："You think she knew about this all along?" 或 "You think he's been lying to us?"。紧接着可以add reasoning来show thought process，如 "See, I did think..."
重复
P1 P3 P4 P7

整个对话中反复出现关于Jimmy的inquiries和references：第1段的 "Has Jimmy been coming in"，第4段的 "asking for Jimmy"，第7段的 "Jimmy's just making it all up" 和 "Jimmy is a good guy"。这种name repetition不仅maintain conversational focus，更importantly create accumulating effect。每次mention Jimmy时都add new piece of suspicious information，这种repetitive pattern让Jimmy's absence变得increasingly suspicious，从simple inquiry escalate到questioning his character。这perfectly serves主旨中reveal Jimmy可能在deceiving multiple people的narrative arc。

信号词 Jimmy money asking came in

仿写： 在对话中使用人名或关键概念的repetition时，确保each mention配合new information或different context来advance plot。仿写模版：首次mention用neutral tone建立subject，第二次mention add complicating detail，第三次mention配合explicit doubt或judgment。例如："Has Tom contacted you?" → "Someone else was looking for Tom yesterday" → "You think Tom is avoiding us?"。这creates progressive revelation而非单调重复。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

4 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

对Jimmy行为的怀疑暗示
P2

Why? Has he been causing any trouble?

反问句 Why? Has he been causing any trouble? Why? Has he been causing trouble? What's that supposed to mean? Are you saying...? You don't think...? Is something wrong?

女服务员的这个 rhetorical question 并不是真的想知道 Jimmy 是否 causing trouble,而是 implies 她对 Jimmy 这个人已经有了某种 negative impression 或者 suspicion。这个 subtle hint 为后续的 plot development 埋下了 foreshadowing——Jimmy 很可能不是一个 reliable person。这对 article's main idea 起到了 crucial role:它 establishes early on 一个 suspicious atmosphere,让 reader 开始 question Jimmy's credibility,为后面揭示 Jimmy 可能在 fabricating stories 来 borrow money 做了 psychological preparation。
另一个受害者的存在暗示
P4

Some other fellow came in asking for Jimmy just yesterday, a real nervous, pushy type of fellow, saying he needed Jimmy for some study project

对比类 Some other fellow came in asking for Jimmy just yesterday Some other fellow another person someone else not the only one there was also similarly

女服务员提到的 'some other fellow' 这个 detail 看似 casual mention,实际上是个 critical clue。它 implies Jimmy 可能在用 similar fabricated stories 向 multiple people 借钱。描述这个人为 'nervous, pushy' 进一步 suggests 这个人也是 victim,急切地想 track down Jimmy。这对 main thesis 极为重要:它 transforms the situation from a simple debt issue 变成了 potential scam pattern,significantly elevates 男主对 Jimmy credibility 的 doubts,directly supports 文章主旨中 'fabricated story to borrow from multiple people' 这个 conclusion。
对事故真实性的质疑
P6

isn't that sort of thing usually covered by insurance? And then, if you still wanted to give money as some sort of apology or something, he probably shouldn't have to go around borrowing it from people.

反问句 isn't that sort of thing usually covered by insurance? isn't that usually wouldn't that normally don't people typically isn't it standard to shouldn't that be isn't that how it works?

女服务员的这个 rhetorical question 看似是 casual comment,实际上是非常 sharp logical challenge。她在 point out Jimmy's story has logical flaws:car damage 应该由 insurance cover,即使要 personally compensate,也不应该到处 borrow money。这个 implication 直接 undermines Jimmy's credibility,suggests his accident story 可能是 fabricated excuse。对 main idea 的贡献是:它 provides logical reasoning 来支持 Jimmy is lying 的 hypothesis,从 rational analysis 角度 reinforce 整个 conversation 逐渐 building up 的 suspicion,为男主最终 realize he's been scammed 提供了 intellectual foundation。
对自己轻信的反思
P7

I did think it was a bit weird for him to be asking for money for that sort of thing. And his story was a bit vague to begin with.

让步类 I did think it was a bit weird it seemed odd I had my doubts something felt off I wasn't entirely sure it struck me as strange I did wonder about

男主的这段 admission 非常关键,因为它 reveals 他其实一开始就 sensed something wrong,但因为 trust in Jimmy ('Jimmy is a good guy') 而选择了 overlook these red flags。这个 implicature shows his growing realization 他可能 made a mistake trusting Jimmy。对 main thesis 的 significance 是:它 demonstrates the psychology of being scammed——victims often have initial doubts but rationalize them away,直到 accumulating evidence forces them to confront reality。这个 self-reflection marks a turning point in the dialogue,where 男主 transitions from defending Jimmy 到 seriously considering 他可能被 deceived,directly advances 文章揭示 scam pattern 的主旨。

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

6 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

Nothing serious, mind you, but he damaged someone's car and wanted to get some money together to make up for the damage he'd caused.
第5段，第3句
本句涵盖了并列谓语、不定式作宾语、不定式作目的状语、省略关系代词的定语从句等多种成分形式，成分种类较丰富。并列谓语、不定式双重用法（宾语+状语）、关系代词省略都是常见易错点。从句嵌套在不定式短语内部的结构也有一定练习价值。适合作为成分划分的综合练习句。
M: You think Jimmy's just making it all up?
第7段，第1句
本句体现省略引导词 that 的宾语从句，这是口语和书面语中的高频句式。主句 + 宾语从句的结构在四六级和考研阅读中大量出现，掌握后可迁移至 believe、suppose、assume 等动词的类似句型。疑问句形式也增加了实用性。
So he'd rather come to us and keep things quiet.
第7段，第5句
本句涵盖了主语、谓语（情态动词加并列动词原形）、宾语、宾语补足语、状语等多种成分，结构比较完整。特别是 keep things quiet 这种 "动词 + 宾语 + 宾语补足语" 结构是常见考点，值得练习区分宾语和宾补。并列动词共用主语的形式也有一定练习价值。
Anyway, Jimmy is a good guy.
第7段，第6句
主系表结构在真题中常见，但本句过于简短且无任何修饰或扩展成分，代表性有限，学习后可迁移的价值不高。
He got his car badly damaged.
第10题，B
本句包含主语、谓语、宾语、宾语补足语（过去分词）四种成分，且涉及 "get + 宾语 + 过去分词" 使役结构和副词修饰宾补的用法，成分丰富。易错点在于区分谓语与宾补、理解复合宾语结构，训练价值高。
He was involved in a traffic accident.
第10题，C
"主语 + be 动词 + 过去分词 + 介词短语状语" 是英语中极其常见的被动句型，在四六级和考研阅读中大量出现（如描述事件、现象、研究结果等场景）。掌握这一句式后可直接迁移到大量类似句子，典型性较高。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 的常见问题

2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章的主旨是什么？: 一名男子在Jimmy常去的地方寻找他,想追回借给他用于修车的60英镑。女子提到另有人也在找Jimmy,这引发了怀疑:Jimmy可能编造了车祸故事,向多人借钱。（英文表述：A man searches for Jimmy at a place he frequents to recover 60 pounds lent for alleged car damage repairs. The woman's account of another person seeking Jimmy raises suspicions that Jimmy may have fabricated the accident story to borrow money from multiple people.）
2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章是什么体裁？难度如何？: 体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B1，全文 288 词、7 段；在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中，B1 级共 113 篇（占 22%）。
2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的？: 全文 7 段按对话骨架分为 6 个意群：第1段、第2段——询问Jimmy近况；第3段——说明寻找Jimmy的原因；第4段——提供另一寻找者信息；第5段——详述借款具体情况；第6段——质疑借款理由合理性；第7段——承认疑虑但维护信任。
2021年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section B (1) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词？: 按文中出现顺序共 3 个：pushy（强势的、咄咄逼人的、爱指使他人的）、fuss（大惊小怪、小题大做、闹腾）、vague（模糊的、不清楚的、含糊的），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。