2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1)
CET-6 · 来自 2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section A (1) · 听力

2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 316 词、8 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

W: Professor Henderson, could you give us a brief overview of what you do, where you work and your main area of research?

M: Well, the Center for Climate Research where I work links the science of climate change to issues around economics and policy. Some of our research is to do with the likely impacts of climate change and all of the associated risks.

W: And how strong is the evidence that climate change is happening? That is really something we need to be worried about.

M: Well most of the science of climate change, particularly that to do with global warming, is simply fact. But other aspects of the science are less certain or at least more disputed. And so we're really talking about risk. What the economics tells us is that it's probably cheaper to avoid climate change—to avoid the risk—than it is to deal with the likely consequences.

W: So what are we doing? What can we do about it?

M: Well, I would argue that we need to develop the science specifically to understand the likely impacts of climate change in different contexts. As I said, we need to understand the best ways of avoiding climate change. And this will involve a huge transition to low-carbon energy systems. And the transition is a tremendous priority. And for this to happen, we may need action on a global scale. From a political perspective, we need to understand the terms on which major countries like China and the USA might sign up to a global agreement because at the moment we don't have that consensus.

W: Right.

M: And we also need to plan ahead so that we are in a position to deal with the likely levels of climate change which are already inevitable, and even more so, too, for the levels that are likely if we don't get those global agreements.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 访谈开场与研究背景介绍

    这个 opening segment 通过 interviewer 的 question 引出了 Professor Henderson 的 professional identity 和他所在的 Center for Climate Research 的 main focus,明确了这场 interview 的 academic context,为后续 discussion 奠定了 research foundation。

    作为 dialogue 的 opening move,这个 sense group 通过 establish 专家的 credibility 和 research scope,为接下来 deep dive into climate change issues 提供了 authoritative basis,让 audience 明白后续 discussion 是基于 solid scientific background 的。

    介绍研究机构和领域
  2. 气候变化证据的科学性探讨

    这个 segment 通过 interviewer 的 challenging question 关于 evidence strength,引出了 professor 对 scientific consensus 和 uncertainty 的 nuanced explanation,特别强调了 global warming 是 established fact,同时引入了 risk assessment 和 economic consideration 的 perspective。

    这个 sense group 通过 address 科学 credibility 的 concern,为主旨中提到的 scientific evidence 提供了 detailed justification,同时通过 introduce economic rationale(prevention cheaper than consequences),为后续的 action-oriented discussion 建立了 logical foundation。

    阐述科学证据和经济分析
  3. 应对气候变化的行动方案

    这个 substantial segment 通过 professor 的 comprehensive answer 展开了 multi-faceted action plan,包括 develop science for impact understanding、transition to low-carbon systems、achieve global consensus(特别提到 China 和 USA),以及 plan for inevitable changes,形成了一个 complete action framework。

    这个 sense group 是 dialogue 的 climax 和 core content,直接对应主旨中的 need for global cooperation、low-carbon energy transition 和 adaptive planning 等 key elements,通过 professor 的 authoritative elaboration 将 abstract concepts 转化为 concrete action items,完成了 interview 的 main communicative goal。

    提出具体应对措施
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 识别访谈开场问题 P1

    对话类文章的 first question 通常会 establish the context 和 introduce the topic。Interviewee 的 professional background 会直接揭示文章的 subject matter。这个 opening question 让我们知道这是一场 academic interview,围绕某个 research field 展开。

  2. 提取研究机构和核心议题 P2

    在 academic interview 中,expert 的 first answer 通常会包含 institutional affiliation 和 research scope。这两个 elements 构成了整个对话的 thematic foundation。如果 interviewee 提到 'center', 'institute', 'department' 等 institutional terms,后面跟着的内容就是 main research area。

  3. 追踪提问逻辑链条 P3 P5

    在 interview dialogue 中,interviewer 的 subsequent questions 会 progressively narrow down or expand on the main topic。这些 questions 的 structure 反映了文章会 cover 哪些 aspects。如果 question 用了 'how strong', 'what can we do', 'why is it important' 这类 interrogative phrases,说明对话会分别讨论 evidence, solutions, and significance。

  4. 提取规范性行动建议 P6 P8

    在 problem-solution 类型的 interview 中,expert 会使用 deontic modality (表示 obligation 或 necessity 的语气) 来表达 recommendations 或 imperatives。这些 statements 通常是文章主旨中的 normative claims,告诉读者 'what ought to be done'。如果一段话里出现多个 'need to' 或 'should',这段就是 high-density information zone。

  5. 综合构建主旨陈述 P2 P4 P6 P8

    主旨的 synthesis 需要将 topic introduction, question-answer structure, 和 prescriptive statements 整合成一个 coherent summary。一个完整的主旨应该回答:What is being discussed? What aspects are covered? What is the overall stance or message? 在这篇文章中,主旨不仅是 'climate change',而是 'climate change research + scientific evidence + economic considerations + global cooperation + energy transition + adaptive planning'。

主旨信号词 climate change P2 need to P6 global P6 evidence P3 transition P6 deal with P8

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

对Henderson教授关于气候变化研究的采访,讨论了全球变暖的科学证据、预防优于补救的经济学原理,以及应对不可避免的气候影响所需的全球合作、低碳能源转型和适应性规划。
An interview with Professor Henderson about climate change research, discussing the scientific evidence for global warming, the economic rationale for prevention over remediation, and the need for global cooperation, low-carbon energy transition, and adaptive planning to address inevitable climate impacts.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

3 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • consensus 共识;一致意见

    现在我们把三条线索串联起来。首先从 semantic clue 看,consensus 和 global agreement 形成同义复现;其次从 logical relationship 看,没有 consensus 就无法让各国 sign up to agreement,说明它是协议的前提;最后从 morphology 看,con-(共同)+ sens(感知)的构词逻辑也支持"共识"这个含义。三条线索相互印证,形成完整的推理链。

    三角验证法
  • dispute 有争议的;被质疑的

    让我们整合所有线索。从 logical relationship 看,disputed 通过 or at least 递进说明 less certain;从 semantic contrast 看,它与 fact 形成正反对比;从 morphology 看,dis-(相反)+ put(想法)的构词逻辑支持"有争议"的含义。三条线索共同指向一个结论:disputed 表示"有争议的"。

    对比-递进-构词三步法
  • transition 转型;过渡;转变

    综合三条线索,我们可以形成完整的推理链。从 semantic context 看,transition 是从当前能源系统到 low-carbon systems 的过程;从 emphasis on importance 看,它是一个 tremendous priority,说明规模巨大;从 morphology 看,trans-(跨越)+ it(走)的构词逻辑完美匹配"转型"的含义。所有线索指向同一个结论。

    方向-强调-词根分析法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

3 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 重复

    P6

    在 第4段 和 第6段 中,Professor Henderson 多次重复使用 'we need to' 这个 structure。在 第6段 中明确出现 'we need to develop', 'we need to understand',形成 anaphora pattern。这种 repetition of structure 创造了 sense of urgency 和 collective responsibility,强调了 multiple areas requiring action,reinforcing 文章主旨中关于 global cooperation 和 comprehensive planning 的必要性,让 listener 感受到 imperative nature of the situation。

    信号词 we need to we must we should we have to it is essential to it is necessary to we require

    仿写: 在 presenting multiple related points 时,可以采用 parallel structure with repeated opening。使用 'We need to...' 或 'We must...' 或 'It is essential to...' 开头的 series of statements。例如:'We need to reform education, we need to invest in technology, we need to support innovation.' 这个 pattern 的 template 是:[Modal verb + subject + infinitive verb] + [different object/action],repeat 3-4 times。注意保持 grammatical parallelism 和 logical progression。

  • 语气词

    P2 P4 P6

    在 第2段, 第4段, 第6段 中,Professor Henderson 频繁使用 'Well' 作为 discourse marker 来 open his responses。这个 pragmatic marker 在 academic interviews 中很常见,它 signals thoughtfulness,gives speaker time to organize thoughts,并且 creates a conversational tone。'Well' 软化了 assertions,让 complex scientific information 显得更 accessible and less dogmatic。这支持了文章主旨中 nuanced discussion of scientific evidence 和 policy implications 的特点,体现了 scholarly caution 和 measured approach。

    信号词 Well Now So Right OK You know I mean Actually Look

    仿写: 在 responding to complex questions 时,用 discourse markers 来 create thinking space 和 soften your tone。Template: '[Well/Now/So], [qualifying phrase like "I would argue that" or "most evidence suggests"], [main point].' 例如:'Well, I would say that the situation is complex...' 或 'Now, from my perspective, the key issue is...' 这让你的 response 显得 thoughtful rather than rehearsed,并且 gives you flexibility to introduce nuanced positions。

  • 省略

    P5 P7

    在 第5段 和 第7段 中,女士的 responses 极其简短:'So what are we doing? What can we do about it?' 和 'Right.' 这些 elliptical responses 省略了 complete grammatical structures。第5段 可以是 'So what are we doing [about climate change]? What can we do about it [to prevent climate change]?',第7段 的 'Right' 省略了如 'Right, I understand' 或 'Right, that makes sense' 等 complete thoughts。这种 ellipsis 在 conversational interviews 中 serves multiple functions:maintains flow,shows active listening,encourages elaboration,并且 keeps focus on the expert's responses 而非 interviewer's commentary。这支持文章主旨,因为它让 Professor Henderson 的 detailed explanations remain central。

    信号词 Right OK Yes Sure Exactly Indeed I see Got it Understood And? So? Meaning?

    仿写: 在 conducting interviews 或 participating in discussions 时,使用 elliptical follow-ups 来 maintain momentum。Template: [Single-word acknowledgment] 或 [Question word + elliptical phrase]。例如:'Right.' 'Exactly.' 'And then?' 'So what about X?' 'Meaning?' 这些 short responses show engagement without interrupting flow。关键是 context 必须 make the omitted elements recoverable。在 asking follow-up questions,你可以省略 already-established subjects and verbs:'And the solution?' instead of 'And what is the solution to that problem?'

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 研究范围的审慎界定

    P2
    Some of our research is to do with the likely impacts of climate change

    模糊限制语 some of part of certain a portion of to some extent in some cases particular

    Henderson 教授说 'some of our research' focuses on impacts,言外之意是他们的 research scope 其实 much broader,不只是 impact assessment。这种 strategic understatement 对 main idea 的作用是 establish credibility——他在 show 自己 research center 的 comprehensive nature,暗示他们 cover multiple dimensions of climate change,而不仅仅是 one narrow area。这为后续 discussion 奠定了 authority。

  • 科学确定性的层次区分

    P4
    most of the science of climate change, particularly that to do with global warming, is simply fact. But other aspects of the science are less certain

    转折类 but however yet nevertheless nonetheless though although

    教授用 'but' 连接两个 contrasting statements,言外之意是在 preemptively address potential skepticism。他先 establish solid ground(warming 是 fact),然后 acknowledge uncertainty exists,这种 balanced approach 对 main idea 的价值在于 build trust——他不是 absolute advocate,而是 presenting nuanced reality。这让他后续关于 'risk' 和 'need for action' 的论点更 credible,因为他 already showed 自己 understand the limitations。

  • 经济理性下的行动催促

    P4
    it's probably cheaper to avoid climate change—to avoid the risk—than it is to deal with the likely consequences

    委婉表达 probably cheaper to avoid probably likely tend to seem to appear to suggest

    用 'probably cheaper' 这种 understated economic framing,言外之意是 make a strong case for immediate action without sounding alarmist。对 main idea 的作用是 shift discussion from 'whether' to 'how'——既然 prevention 在经济上 makes sense,那么 debate 应该 focus on implementation。这个 subtle shift 是 persuasive strategy,让 action 显得 rational and inevitable 而非 ideological,呼应了文章关于 'need for transition' 的 core message。

  • 全球行动的必要性暗示

    P6
    for this to happen, we may need action on a global scale

    情态词 may need might require should must have to need to it's necessary

    'May need' 表面是 possibility,言外之意是 absolute necessity。Henderson 用 tentative language 来 talk about global cooperation,是因为 he knows 这是 politically difficult topic。对 main idea 的作用是 introduce the collaboration theme——文章后面会 elaborate on why China and USA agreement is crucial。这种 soft introduction 让后续 discussion of political challenges 显得 natural and well-grounded,支撑了文章关于 'need for global consensus' 的 key message。

  • 当前困境的委婉披露

    P6
    at the moment we don't have that consensus

    对比类 at the moment we don't have at the moment currently right now presently so far up to now

    用 'at the moment' 来 frame the lack of consensus,言外之意是 this is a temporary challenge that can be overcome,而非 permanent barrier。对 main idea 的价值在于 maintain constructive tone——尽管 facing political obstacles,但 framework 暗示 solution is achievable。这 supports 文章的 call for action 主题,acknowledging difficulty 的同时 keeping focus on 'what needs to be done' rather than 'what's impossible'。

  • 最坏情境的预设

    P8
    levels of climate change which are already inevitable, and even more so, too, for the levels that are likely if we don't get those global agreements

    对比词 even more so even more especially particularly above all most importantly still more

    'Even more so' 暗示一个 two-tier threat structure,言外之意是 even with best efforts, some damage is locked in,但 inaction will make it catastrophically worse。对 main idea 的作用是 provide ultimate justification for global cooperation——这不是 optional,而是 critical for limiting damage。这个 closing emphasis 将全文主题 tie together,从 scientific evidence 到 economic rationale,最终 pointing to why global agreements matter,reinforcing the entire argument structure。

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

3 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 的常见问题

2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的主旨是什么?
对Henderson教授关于气候变化研究的采访,讨论了全球变暖的科学证据、预防优于补救的经济学原理,以及应对不可避免的气候影响所需的全球合作、低碳能源转型和适应性规划。(英文表述:An interview with Professor Henderson about climate change research, discussing the scientific evidence for global warming, the economic rationale for prevention over remediation, and the need for global cooperation, low-carbon energy transition, and adaptive planning to address inevitable climate impacts.)
2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 316 词、8 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 8 段按对话骨架分为 3 个意群:第1段、第2段——访谈开场与研究背景介绍;第3段、第4段——气候变化证据的科学性探讨;第5段、第6段、第7段、第8段——应对气候变化的行动方案。
2016年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 3 个:consensus(共识;一致意见)、dispute(有争议的;被质疑的)、transition(转型;过渡;转变),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: