2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section A (2) · 听力

2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 316 词、14 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

14 段英文原文

以下为2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 14 段。左侧 P1–P14 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

M: It's getting late and we're both displaying signs of weariness. I think we should call it a day and meet again tomorrow morning.

W: Oh, come on, Jeff. We are so close! Don't you think we are almost done? Let's do two more hours, please.

M: One hour, then I'm going home.

W: OK, fine. I think we are making good progress, and that with a few more amendments, we will be all done.

M: I'm sure looking forward to it. I'm so tired of this project. Don't get me wrong. It's a great professional opportunity for me and a milestone for the company, but it's just been so long.

W: Yeah. Two months working on nothing but the same contract is a little tough. Nevertheless, I think that with a bit of luck, we'll be done by next week.

M: Ha, you must be delusional.

W: You don't think so?

M: No chance. Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9 still have to be aligned to the new framework. Then we need to proofread the whole thing and make sure all selling points are watertight.

W: But that will all take no more than a couple of days.

M: I wasn't finished. When we are done with it and send it upstairs, what do you think will happen?

W: What?

M: They'll argue about it for like a month. There's always going to be the odd board member who intervenes and demands rectifications be made. They might think they're being helpful, but in reality they're being obstructive and hampering progress.

W: Oh, Jeff, you're too preoccupied and cynical. It won't be anywhere as bad as that. You'll see, the entire managerial hierarchy wants to see this project implemented as soon as possible, and the board, too, is virtually unanimous in its support. Go on then, let's stop there and meet up again same time tomorrow.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

8 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. Jeff提议结束工作

    Jeff 注意到 signs of weariness 疲惫迹象后 propose 提议 call it a day 今天收工,tomorrow morning 明天早上再 meet 继续,这是 dialogue opening 对话开场,directly 直接引出 central conflict 核心冲突点

    这个 opening move 开场动作 establish 建立了 debate 辩论的 initial position 初始立场,Jeff's fatigue 疲劳感 serves as 作为 trigger 触发点,directly leads to 直接导向主旨中的 whether to continue working 是否继续工作这一 central question 核心问题

    提出停止工作请求
  2. 同事坚持继续工作

    W immediately 立即 counter 反驳 Jeff 的 proposal,用 encouraging tone 鼓励语气 (come on) 和 proximity reasoning 接近完成的理由 (so close, almost done) 来 persuade 说服继续 two more hours,展现 opposing stance 对立立场

    这个 counterargument 反论 intensify 加剧了 debate 辩论,W's insistence 坚持 form 形成 direct opposition 直接对立,pushing 推动 conversation 对话向 negotiation 协商方向发展,是主旨中 debate 辩论的 essential component 核心组成

    要求延长工作时间
  3. 双方达成妥协

    Jeff compromise 妥协同意 one hour,W accept 接受这个 middle ground 中间方案,dialogue 对话从 conflict 冲突转向 agreement 达成一致,并 transition 过渡到 discuss progress 讨论进展,体现 negotiation resolution 协商解决

    这个 compromise 妥协 temporarily resolve 暂时解决了 immediate conflict 即时冲突,但 simultaneously 同时 shift focus 转移焦点到 project progress 项目进展,为后续 deeper discussion 更深入讨论 about timelines 关于时间线 pave the way 铺路,是 debate 辩论的 transitional phase 过渡阶段

    就工作时长协商一致
  4. Jeff表达项目疲惫感

    Jeff express 表达对 project 的 weariness 厌倦感,acknowledge 承认它是 professional opportunity 职业机会和 milestone 里程碑,但 emphasize 强调 duration 持续时间太长带来的 exhaustion 疲惫,reveal 揭示 emotional state 情感状态

    这个 emotional disclosure 情感披露 provide 提供 psychological background 心理背景 for Jeff's initial proposal 最初提议,explain 解释 why 为什么他 wants to stop 想停止,deepening 加深 reader's understanding 理解 of debate's underlying tensions 辩论的深层紧张关系

    解释疲劳原因
  5. 讨论项目完成预期

    W respond 回应 Jeff 的 complaint 抱怨,acknowledge 认同 two months 的辛苦,但 optimistically predict 乐观预测 next week 下周 completion 完成,Jeff react with 反应以 skepticism 怀疑 (delusional),开启 timeline debate 时间线辩论

    这个 exchange 交流 introduce 引入主旨中 differing attitudes about timelines 对时间线的不同态度这一 key element 关键要素,W's optimism 乐观与 Jeff's skepticism 怀疑形成 sharp contrast 鲜明对比,escalate 升级 debate 辩论到新层面

    预测完成时间
  6. Jeff详述剩余工作

    Jeff provide 提供 detailed evidence 详细证据支持他的 pessimism 悲观态度,list 列举 remaining tasks 剩余任务 (sections alignment, proofreading, watertight selling points),argue 论证这些 will take longer than 会比 W estimates 估计的更久,strengthen 强化他的 position 立场

    这个 detailed breakdown 详细分解 substantiate 证实 Jeff's skepticism 怀疑,provide 提供 concrete basis 具体基础 for debate 辩论,show 展示主旨中 remaining work 剩余工作的 complexity 复杂性,justify 证明他 wants to stop 想停止的合理性

    列举未完成任务
  7. Jeff预测审批延误

    Jeff continue 继续 argumentation,shift focus 转移焦点到 board review process 董事会审批流程,predict 预测 lengthy debates 冗长辩论和 obstructive interventions 阻碍性干预,这是 anticipated delays 预期延迟的 another layer 另一层面,further support 进一步支持他的 pessimistic timeline 悲观时间线

    这个 prediction 预测 directly address 直接呼应主旨中 anticipated delays from board review 董事会审批的预期延迟,是 Jeff's argument 论证的 climax 高潮,reveal 揭示他对 organizational dynamics 组织动态的 cynical view 悲观看法

    预测审批障碍
  8. W反驳并结束对话

    W firmly reject 坚决拒绝 Jeff's pessimism,label 标签他为 preoccupied and cynical,provide 提供 counterarguments 反论据 (managerial support, board unanimity),maintain 保持 optimistic stance 乐观立场,然后 suggest 建议 end discussion 结束讨论 and reconvene tomorrow,形成 dialogue closure 对话收尾

    这个 final rebuttal 最终反驳 complete 完成主旨中 differing attitudes 不同态度的 portrayal 刻画,W's optimism 乐观 persist 持续 despite 尽管 Jeff's detailed arguments 详细论证,leave 留下 debate unresolved 辩论未解决,echoing 呼应主旨的 open-ended nature 开放结局特性

    维持乐观立场
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 开篇提议与反对 P1 P2 P3

    对话类文章的 main idea 通常在开头的 exchange 中就建立了 basic conflict structure。第一轮 proposal 和 counter-proposal 往往定义了整个对话的 central tension,这是 debate-style dialogue 的典型特征。

  2. 项目合同工作 P4 P5 P6

    对话主旨需要 subject specificity,仅仅知道两人在 debate 是不够的,必须明确 what they're debating about。Topic anchors 如 project, contract, sections 将 abstract disagreement 转化为 concrete issue,这是 contextualizing the main idea 的关键。

  3. 对话主旨的完整性要求不仅呈现 what they debate,还要揭示 how they differ in perception。Attitudinal contrast 通过 evaluative language 和 prediction statements 表现出来,这些差异比事实陈述更能体现 thematic depth of disagreement。

  4. 对话类主旨是 multi-dimensional construct,单一维度只能提供 partial understanding。Complete main idea 必须整合 interpersonal dynamics (who wants what)、topical focus (about what)、action-level disagreement (do or not do)、和 cognitive-level disagreement (how to evaluate),才能达到 comprehensive thematic summary 的标准。

主旨信号词 call it a day P1 come on P2 so tired of P5 delusional P7 virtually unanimous P14

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

两位同事就是否继续完成一项漫长的合同项目进行辩论。Jeff因疲劳想要停止工作,而他的搭档敦促继续。他们讨论了剩余工作和预期的董事会审查延误,显示出对项目完成时间表的不同态度。
Two colleagues debate whether to continue working on a lengthy contract project. Jeff wants to stop due to fatigue, while his partner urges continuation. They discuss remaining work and anticipated delays from board review, revealing differing attitudes about project completion timelines.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • weariness 疲惫、困乏

    现在让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,从 sentence structure 看,时间晚 + weariness → 停工,这是一个典型的因果链。其次,从 word formation 分析,-ness suffix 告诉我们这是一个 state noun。最后,从 thematic consistency 来看,整篇对话反复出现 tired、so long、two months 这些表达,构建了一个 exhaustion theme。将这三条线索整合:weariness 是一种因长时间工作而在晚间显现、导致需要停工的状态,这个状态与 tired 同属一个语义场。

    状态名词的三重验证
  • delusional 妄想的、脱离现实的

    让我们整合这四条 clues。首先,从 conversational dynamics 看,delusional 出现在女士乐观预测后,紧跟强烈否定,这确立了它的 negative evaluative function。其次,从 evidential support 看,男士列举的 massive workload 和 board obstacles 证明女士的判断 detached from reality。第三,从 morphology 看,-al suffix 表明这是描述 state 或 quality 的 adjective。第四,从 semantic opposition 看,它与 cynical 形成对立,定位在 over-optimistic 端。综合这些线索,delusional 描述一种脱离现实的、过度乐观的错误判断状态。

    评价性形容词的四步法
  • rectification 修正、纠正

    现在整合三条 clues。从 syntax 角度,demands rectifications be made 这个 structure 告诉我们 rectifications 是需要被执行的 actions,且从 obstructive 评价可知这些 actions 会 delay progress。从 morphology 看,-ification suffix 明确标识这是某种 changing process 的 nominalization。从 contextual parallelism 看,它与 align、proofread 这些 corrective actions 属于同一 semantic category。综合起来,rectifications 指的是对已完成工作的 corrections 或 adjustments,通常是上级要求的修改。

    过程名词的三角定位
  • watertight 严密的、无懈可击的

    整合三条 clues。从 task logic 看,watertight 是 proofread 之后更高层次的 quality check,针对的不是 typos 而是 argument integrity。从 compound word semantics 看,water + tight 的 literal meaning 经过 metaphorical mapping 可以表示 no gaps、no leaks 的抽象概念。从 professional context 看,contract 环境要求所有 selling points 必须能经受 board scrutiny,不能有任何 loopholes。这三个维度交汇,watertight 在此处指论证或条款严密无漏洞、无懈可击。

    复合词的隐喻映射
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

4 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 反问

    P8

    在第8段中,W用"You don't think so?"这个rhetorical question来challenge Jeff的pessimistic view。这个反问并不是真的在asking for information,而是表达她的surprise和disagreement。这种修辞手法使对话更具tension,突出了两人对project timeline的conflicting perspectives,强化了文章主旨中关于differing attitudes的核心矛盾。

    信号词 don't you think you don't think do you really believe are you saying you mean really seriously

    仿写: 当你想express disagreement但又不想directly confront对方时,可以use反问。建议的approach是:先capture对方的statement,然后用"You think/believe/mean...?"的pattern来question它。模版:'A: [提出观点]. B: You really think/believe [重述A的观点]?' 或者 'A: [做出判断]. B: [关键词] + question word (don't/won't/can't) + [核心动作]?'

  • 语气词

    P2 P7

    在第2段中,"Oh, come on"这个exclamation展现了W的impatience和persuasive tone。这个语气词set了整个conversation的emotional undertone,表明W更eager和optimistic。在第7段中,"Ha"这个interjection表达了Jeff的skepticism和dismissive attitude。这些语气词help establish各自的character traits,使readers能feel到tension between their contrasting work attitudes,直接服务于主旨中的debate和differing attitudes。

    信号词 Oh Ha Well Ugh Hmm Ah Come on Geez Wow

    仿写: 使用语气词时要match character的personality和current emotion。Suggestion是:在dialogue opening或者responding to surprising statements时strategically place interjections。模版:'[语气词], [主句]' 用于express strong emotion;'[陈述], [语气词]' 用于emphasize或者show reaction。常用combinations: 'Oh, come on' (persuasion/impatience), 'Ha' (disbelief), 'Well' (hesitation), 'Ugh' (frustration)。

  • 省略

    P3 P12

    在第3段中,"One hour, then I'm going home"省略了主语I和动词work for,complete sentence应该是'I will work for one hour'。这个ellipsis使Jeff的response显得more decisive和curt,reflecting his fatigue和reluctance。在第12段中,W的"What?"是extreme ellipsis,完整应该是'What will happen?'。这种省略create了natural conversational flow,make dialogue feel spontaneous而不是scripted,perfectly capture了working relationship中的casual yet tense dynamic。

    仿写: 运用省略时要ensure context足够clear让readers能reconstruct完整meaning。Approach是:省略repeated elements或者obvious information。模版:在giving short answers时直接说key information如'[Time/quantity], then [action]';在questioning时用single words like '[Question word]?';在expressing agreement/disagreement时说'[Core attitude word]' instead of full sentence。但avoid过度省略以免造成confusion。

  • 重复

    P9 P13

    在第9段和第13段中,Jeff用"I wasn't finished"来interrupt并continue his point,这个repetitive pattern of listing remaining tasks和anticipated obstacles creates a sense of overwhelming workload。特别是在第13段,他用"they're being... they're being..."的parallel structure来emphasize board members的problematic behavior。这种repetition reinforces Jeff的pessimistic view和cynical attitude,perfectly illustrates文章主旨中他对project completion timeline的negative perspective。

    信号词 they're being it's we need to I think you know let's that's

    仿写: 使用重复时要strategic地choose what to repeat以maximize impact。Method是:repeat key verbs或者adjectives来emphasize action或quality;use parallel structures like 'they're [verb+ing]... they're [verb+ing]'来create rhythm and emphasis。模版:'It's [adjective], it's [adjective], it's [adjective]' 或者 'We need to [action], we need to [action]'。但avoid excessive repetition which可能sound redundant rather than emphatic。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

18 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 以共同疲劳促成停工

    P1
    we're both displaying signs of weariness

    共同立场预设 we're both we all both of us everyone knows as we agree clearly

    Jeff 并非只是在客观描述疲劳,而是在借“我们都累了”建立 shared ground,暗示继续工作既低效又不合理;这为他提出明天再见的 request 增加了正当性,也揭示他已倾向于结束当天工作。

  • 委婉提出结束工作

    P1
    I think we should call it a day

    委婉表达 call it a day wrap things up take a break perhaps we should stop let's leave it there maybe another time

    call it a day 的字面不是“叫它一天”,而是“今天到此为止”;Jeff 用较柔和的表达提出 stop working,暗示他顾及同事关系,但实际立场十分明确。

  • 以临近完成施加劝说

    P2
    We are so close!

    程度强调 so close almost nearly just a little more within reach on the verge of

    女同事强调 so close,暗示现在停下会浪费前面的投入,因而应再坚持;这表现出她对进度较乐观,也构成对 Jeff 停工提议的直接反驳。

  • 反问实为要求认同

    P2
    Don't you think we are almost done?

    反问句 Don't you think isn't it aren't we how could who wouldn't what else can we do

    女同事不是诚恳地向 Jeff 请教项目是否接近完成,而是在期待他回答“是”,从而接受多工作两小时;该反问强化了她的催促和乐观判断。

  • 有限让步但保留底线

    P3
    One hour, then I'm going home.

    条件式让步 One hour, then one hour, then only if as long as I can, but all right, but up to a point

    Jeff 同意继续一小时,说明他并非完全不合作;但 then I'm going home 明确表示一小时后不能再谈,暗示他的疲劳已接近忍耐上限。

  • 淡化剩余修改量

    P4
    with a few more amendments, we will be all done

    模糊限制语 a few more a bit a couple of just only more or less

    女同事把尚需完成的工作说成 a few more amendments,暗示收尾工作很少、项目即将完成;这延续她的乐观立场,并为继续加班提供理由。

  • 先肯定后吐露厌倦

    P5
    It's a great professional opportunity for me ... but it's just been so long.

    让步转折 Don't get me wrong ... but although though even though however yet but

    Jeff 先承认项目对个人和公司都有价值,避免自己显得不敬业;但他真正要表达的是长期项目已令他厌烦,暗示“项目重要”并不能抵消他的疲惫。

  • 用好运掩盖不确定性

    P6
    with a bit of luck, we'll be done by next week

    条件性模糊限制语 with a bit of luck hopefully if all goes well fingers crossed perhaps maybe

    女同事预测 next week 完工,却加上 with a bit of luck,说明这更像 hopeful estimate 而非可靠承诺;它凸显她仍乐观,而 Jeff 随后会以现实流程否定该预测。

  • 讽刺对方过度乐观

    P7
    you must be delusional

    夸张性评价 delusional ridiculous unrealistic absurd no way impossible

    Jeff 说 delusional 并非真的诊断对方有精神问题,而是夸张地表示“下周完成绝不现实”;这一讽刺把双方的时间预期冲突推到最明显的位置。

  • 清单揭示工期被低估

    P9
    Sections 4, 5, 8 and 9 still have to be aligned ... Then we need to proofread the whole thing

    递进列举 still ... Then still then after that on top of that in addition not to mention

    Jeff 具体列出四个章节的调整、全文校对和卖点核查,暗示项目尚未接近收尾;这些细节为他“下周完成不可能”的判断提供了现实依据。

  • 合同兼具销售与风险属性

    P9
    make sure all selling points are watertight

    专业搭配暗示 selling points ... watertight selling points watertight legally sound fully compliant risk-free ironclad

    Jeff 暗示这份 contract 不只是文字校对,还要确保商业卖点经得起推敲且没有漏洞;因此项目的难点在质量和风险控制,而非简单修改几天即可完成。

  • 再次压缩任务难度

    P10
    that will all take no more than a couple of days

    上限弱化表达 no more than at most only just nothing more than a mere

    女同事认为前述大量任务最多两天,暗示她把执行阶段看得很简单;她没有考虑或暂时忽略后续审批,因而与 Jeff 的悲观估计形成鲜明对比。

  • 反问预告更大阻碍

    P11
    When we are done with it and send it upstairs, what do you think will happen?

    引导式反问 what do you think will happen? what do you think will happen what happens next and then what can you imagine do you know what that means guess what

    Jeff 的问题暗示真正的拖延不在合同写作,而在 send it upstairs 之后的管理层审批;这使讨论从“还要做几天”升级为“整个组织流程会拖多久”。

  • 绝对化经验预设必然拖延

    P13
    There's always going to be the odd board member who intervenes

    绝对化概括 There's always going to be always never inevitably every time without fail there's bound to be

    Jeff 认为总会有某位董事干预,暗示他曾多次经历类似审批拖延,并已对 board 形成负面预期;这为其悲观时间表补充了组织层面的理由。

  • 表面帮助实则阻碍

    P13
    They might think they're being helpful, but in reality they're being obstructive

    表象与现实对比 but in reality actually in fact seem to appear to rather than

    Jeff 并非说董事故意破坏项目,而是认为他们主观上 helpful、客观上 obstructive;这种区分让他的批评显得更理性,同时强化审批会 hampering progress 的判断。

  • 将悲观归因于心理状态

    P14
    you're too preoccupied and cynical

    人际评价性反驳 too preoccupied and cynical too cynical too negative overthinking too pessimistic preoccupied you're worrying too much

    女同事没有立刻逐项否认审批风险,而是说 Jeff 太焦虑、太愤世嫉俗;她暗示 Jeff 的预测受负面心态影响,因此不应被完全相信。

  • 近乎一致仍留例外

    P14
    the board, too, is virtually unanimous in its support

    近似性限定 virtually unanimous virtually almost nearly practically more or less largely

    女同事强调董事会几乎一致支持实施,意在反驳 Jeff 对 board 的不信任;但 virtually 也不慎留下了少数异议者存在的可能,这恰好没有彻底消除 Jeff 的担忧。

  • 接受停工以缓和分歧

    P14
    Go on then, let's stop there and meet up again same time tomorrow.

    立场调整式委婉表达 let's stop there let's leave it for now we can continue tomorrow fair enough all right then let's call it a night

    女同事最初要求再工作两小时,最后却主动说 let's stop there,暗示她接受了 Jeff 的疲劳状态;这不是她完全放弃乐观判断,而是以 practical compromise 结束当晚分歧。

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

10 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

  • I'm so tired of this project.
    第5段,第2句

    主系表结构在真题中较为常见,但本句过于简单,缺少修饰成分和从句,作为真题句式的代表性一般,迁移价值有限。

  • Two months working on nothing but the same contract is a little tough.
    第6段,第2句

    本句主系表结构简单,但主语部分包含名词加后置定语的组合,可以练习识别现在分词短语作定语与作状语的区别,以及如何找到被修饰的中心词,这是常见易错点,有一定训练价值

  • Nevertheless, I think that with a bit of luck, we'll be done by next week.
    第6段,第3句

    "主句动词 + that 宾语从句"是四六级和考研阅读中非常常见的句式,且从句内包含被动语态和时间状语,都是典型考点结构。掌握此类句式可迁移到大量类似句子。

  • W: But that will all take no more than a couple of days.
    第10段,第1句

    简单的主谓宾结构在真题中常见,但本句过于简单,缺少真题中常考的从句嵌套、后置定语、分隔结构等典型难点,代表性和迁移价值有限。

  • There's always going to be the odd board member who intervenes and demands rectifications be made.
    第13段,第2句

    综合来看,本句主干识别难度适中,嵌套和时态难度偏高,且包含 there be 句型、定语从句、虚拟语气被动等多个高频考点,结构典型,作为句子结构和时态的综合训练材料具有较高价值,适合中等偏上水平的专项练习

  • You'll see, the entire managerial hierarchy wants to see this project implemented as soon as possible, and the board, too, is virtually unanimous in its support.
    第14段,第3句

    并列主句结构在四六级和考研阅读中较为常见,且第二个主句中 "want to see something done" 的句式(不定式 + 宾语 + 过去分词作宾补)也是典型的英语表达方式,具有一定的代表性和迁移价值,但整体句式并非最高频的复杂结构。

  • They have got their work done.
    第5题,A

    涵盖主语、谓语、宾语、宾语补足语四种核心成分,尤其是使役动词 "get" 后接宾语和过去分词作补足语这一结构,是常见易错点。可以帮助学生区分谓语动词与非谓语动词(过去分词)的成分归属,具有较好的训练价值。

  • They can meet again tomorrow anyway.
    第5题,C

    情态动词加动词原形是四六级和考研常见基础句式,但本句过于简单,缺少从句、复杂修饰等真题高频特征,典型性中等

  • They are both anxious to go home.
    第5题,D

    主系表结构加不定式补足语(如 "be anxious to do")是英语中常见的表达方式,在各类考试和实际交流中频繁出现。虽然本句本身较为简单,但它体现的"系动词 + 形容词 + 不定式"这一搭配模式具有较高的复用性,学习者掌握后可以套用到 "be eager to do"、"be ready to do" 等类似结构中,因此具有一定的典型性和实用价值。

  • What does the woman say is a little tough?
    第6题题干

    本句在成分划分上有较高的训练价值。主句包含主语、谓语和宾语从句;宾语从句内部有主语(疑问词 What)、系动词和表语。特别是 What 在从句中既作主语又引导从句这一点,以及宾语从句整体作为主句宾语的识别,都是常见的易错点,适合训练学生识别复杂宾语的能力。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 的常见问题

2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
两位同事就是否继续完成一项漫长的合同项目进行辩论。Jeff因疲劳想要停止工作,而他的搭档敦促继续。他们讨论了剩余工作和预期的董事会审查延误,显示出对项目完成时间表的不同态度。(英文表述:Two colleagues debate whether to continue working on a lengthy contract project. Jeff wants to stop due to fatigue, while his partner urges continuation. They discuss remaining work and anticipated delays from board review, revealing differing attitudes about project completion timelines.)
2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 316 词、14 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 14 段按对话骨架分为 8 个意群:第1段——Jeff提议结束工作;第2段——同事坚持继续工作;第3段、第4段——双方达成妥协;第5段——Jeff表达项目疲惫感;第6段、第7段、第8段——讨论项目完成预期;第9段、第10段——Jeff详述剩余工作;第11段、第12段、第13段——Jeff预测审批延误;第14段——W反驳并结束对话。
2025年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:weariness(疲惫、困乏)、delusional(妄想的、脱离现实的)、rectification(修正、纠正)、watertight(严密的、无懈可击的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: