2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 · Part II Section A (2) · 听力

2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 328 词、13 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语六级文章中占 39%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

13 段英文原文

以下为2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 13 段。左侧 P1–P13 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

W: Hi, Tony, today we're talking about how managers can get along better with young people at work. We often hear young people today have a poor work ethic. That's not really justified though, is it?

M: Not really. In reality, young people of this age group are as varied and multifaceted as any other generation.

W: Yeah, but if you are struggling to work with young people in your workspace, what can you do?

M: Well, it's essential to connect with them to learn about their values. It's also really important to recognize the way young people want to balance their work life with their personal life.

W: So they generally don't want to defer happiness in return for career advancement?

M: Absolutely. They are not willing to sacrifice their personal lives for their work lives and this leads people to equate that with an unwillingness to work hard.

W: Right. But that couldn't be further from the truth, could it?

M: Young people will work extremely hard during their defined work hours, but they expect to have their time off, like weekends and nights free from work.

W: So how should managers go about assessing young people's productivity?

M: Generally, young people believe their productivity should not be measured by the number of hours they work, since someone can work for eight hours and accomplish next to nothing of significance for the company. Instead, young people measure their productivity levels by the quality of the work they perform.

W: But we often hear that young people want to feel more than just being a part of a big machine. Such a perspective can be hard to discredit, can't it?

M: It's important to legitimize their work. Young workers want to work on projects that matter to themselves, the company or the world at large. They must feel the need to stay working at a company whose values align with their own.

W: Thanks for your advice.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 开场引入话题

    女主持人 introduce 今天的 topic:managers 如何与 young people 更好地 work together,并提出一个 common misconception —— young people 缺乏 work ethic,然后引导男嘉宾进行 response。

    这个 opening 意群通过 presenting 一个需要 address 的 stereotype,为整个 dialogue 建立了 framework,clarify 讨论的 direction 是如何 understand 和 work with young employees。

    提出核心议题
  2. 识别管理难题并给出核心建议

    女主持人 raise 一个 practical problem:如果 struggling to work with young people 该怎么办?男嘉宾 provide concrete advice:需要 connect with them 去 learn 他们的 values,并且 recognize 他们对 work-life balance 的 expectations。

    这个意群从 abstract discussion 转向 practical guidance,directly address managers 面临的 challenges,并 establish 两个 key principles:understanding values 和 recognizing work-life balance needs,为后续 detailed elaboration 设定了 framework。

    提出管理策略起点
  3. 阐释工作生活平衡观

    围绕 work-life balance 这个 key value 进行 in-depth discussion。女主持人 seek confirmation(不愿 defer happiness),男嘉宾 elaborate 年轻人 not willing to sacrifice personal lives,并 clarify 这常被 misinterpreted 为不愿 work hard,但实际上他们在 defined work hours 内会 extremely hard working,只是 expect 自己的 off time 不被 intrude。

    这个意群 deeply unpack 了 young employees 的 first core characteristic:work-life balance priority。通过 clarifying misconceptions 和 explaining true motivations,帮助 managers understand 这不是 laziness 而是 different value system,直接 support 主旨中关于 understanding values 的 dimension。

    阐明首要价值观
  4. 重新定义生产力评估标准

    女主持人 shift topic 到 productivity assessment,男嘉宾 explain 年轻人的 perspective:productivity 不应该 measured by hours worked,因为 someone 可以 work eight hours 却 accomplish nothing significant;相反,young people 通过 quality of work 来 measure 他们的 productivity levels。

    这个意群 introduce 年轻员工的 second key characteristic:outcome-based 而非 time-based 的 productivity view。这 complement 了前面的 work-life balance discussion,together 构建了 comprehensive understanding of young workers' values,直接 support 主旨中 productivity measured by quality 的 point。

    提出第二核心价值
  5. 强调工作意义感的重要性

    女主持人 bring up 年轻人想要 feel more than being part of a big machine 这个 perspective,男嘉宾强调需要 legitimize their work,年轻人 want to work on projects that matter(to themselves、company 或 world),他们 must feel the need 去 stay 在 values align 的 company。

    这个意群 complete 了对年轻员工 value system 的 three-dimensional portrait:work-life balance、quality-based productivity、和 meaningful work。最后这个 dimension 关于 personal values alignment 直接 correspond 主旨中 desire for meaningful work aligned with personal values 的 point,为整个 discussion 提供 comprehensive closure。

    揭示第三核心诉求
  6. 对话礼貌性收尾

    女主持人用简洁的 thanks for your advice 来 close 整个 dialogue,这是 conversation 的 conventional ending formula。

    这个意群是 purely procedural,没有 contribute substantive content to the thesis,只是 fulfill dialogue 的 social convention,signal 整个 discussion 的 completion。

    程序性结束
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 开篇话题定位 P1

    对话类文章的 opening 部分通常会通过 explicit statement 直接揭示 topic,比如本文中的 "today we're talking about how managers can get along better with young people at work"。这个 explicit statement 为后续所有 discussion 定下了 framework,是判断 main idea 的起点。

  2. 高频概念追踪 P4 P6 P8 P10 P12

    在这篇 dialogue 中,work-life balance、productivity measurement、meaningful work 这些 concepts 被反复 discussed 和 developed。这种 repetition and elaboration 表明它们不是 peripheral details,而是构成 main idea 的 core components。

  3. 问题解答结构 P3 P5 P7 P9 P11

    本文的 structure 非常清晰:W 提出 questions 和 potential misconceptions(如 "poor work ethic"、"how should managers assess productivity"),M 则提供 clarifications 和 solutions(如 "recognize work-life balance"、"measure by quality not hours")。这种 Q&A structure 中,solutions 的 accumulation 共同构成了 main idea。

  4. 综合前三个步骤,我们能看到本文的 main idea 是通过 systematic approach 构建的:opening 定义了 scope(managers working with young people),recurring themes 确定了 key dimensions(work-life balance、quality-based productivity、meaningful work),problem-solution structure 提供了 actionable framework(understand values、recognize priorities、legitimize work)。三者结合,形成完整的 main idea。

主旨信号词 how managers can get along better with P1 it's essential to P4 not really P2 they expect to P8 instead P10

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

对话讨论了管理者如何通过理解年轻员工的价值观来更好地与他们共事,特别是他们对工作与生活平衡的重视、以质量而非工时衡量生产力,以及对与个人价值观一致的有意义工作的渴望。
The dialogue discusses how managers can better work with young employees by understanding their values, particularly their emphasis on work-life balance, productivity measured by quality rather than hours, and desire for meaningful work aligned with personal values.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • multifaceted 多方面的;多层面的

    我们通过三条 clues 来 decode 这个词。首先,从 syntactic structure 看,'varied and multifaceted' 这个 parallel structure 告诉我们两个词的 semantic field 是相近的。'varied' 强调 diversity,那 'multifaceted' 应该也在描述某种 complexity。接着,从 morphology 入手:'multi-' 这个 prefix 明确指向'多','facet' 这个 root 表示'面'或'方面',所以这是一个'多方面的'词。最后,从整个 dialogue 的 argumentative context 来看,Tony 在 challenge 那种 one-dimensional view,他需要一个词来表达年轻人的 complexity 和 diversity。三条线索 converge 到同一个 conclusion。

    句法构词语境三维验证
  • defer 推迟;延后

    让我们把这些 pieces 组合起来。从 syntactic structure 看,'defer happiness in return for career advancement' 这个 pattern 设定了一个 temporal trade-off:现在的 happiness vs. 未来的 career。接着,Tony 用 'sacrifice' 这个词来 echo 'defer',而 sacrifice 明确包含 'giving up' 的意思,但结合 'in return for' 的 structure,这不是永久 give up,而是 temporary。最后,整个 dialogue 的 theme 是 work-life balance,年轻人 reject 的正是那种'把现在的 enjoyment 往后推'的 mindset。所有 clues 都指向 'defer' = postpone/delay。

    交换语境同义映射
  • equate 等同于;将...视为等同

    三条 clues 形成一个清晰的 inference chain。Syntactically,'equate A with B' 这个 structure with 'with' preposition 明确表示建立某种 equivalence 或 association。Morphologically,'equ-' root 直接指向 'equal' 的 semantic field,意思是'相等'。从 pragmatic level 看,这个 verb 描述的是一个 false equation,是人们如何 mistakenly treat A and B as the same thing。三个 layers 的 analysis converge:equate = treat as equal/equivalent。

    词根句式功能三点定位
  • discredit 质疑;否定...的可信度

    让我们 synthesize 这三个 angles。从 immediate context,'hard to discredit' 修饰的是一个 valid perspective,说明 discredit 是一个 negative evaluation action。从 word structure,'dis-'(否定)+ 'credit'(信用)= 'remove credibility'。从 dialogue flow,Tony 用 'legitimize' 来 counter 前面的问题,而 legitimize 和 discredit 构成 antonym pair。三条 lines of evidence 都指向同一个 meaning:discredit = challenge the credibility/validity of something。

    前缀基词反义三步
  • legitimize 使合法化;赋予正当性

    三条 clues 构建了一个 comprehensive understanding。从 pragmatic context,'legitimize' 是对 'discredit' 的 counteraction,是一个 positive intervention。从 morphological structure,'legitimate'(正当的)+ '-ize'(使成为)= make something legitimate。从 subsequent elaboration,'legitimize their work' 被 expanded 为让 work 'matter',有 significance。这三个 dimensions 互相 reinforce:legitimize = give validity and significance to something。

    基质转化后文三联
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

4 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 反问

    P1 P5 P7 P11

    文章中出现了多处 rhetorical questions,比如 第1段 的 'That's not really justified though, is it?'、第5段 的 'So they generally don't want to defer happiness in return for career advancement?'、第7段 的 'But that couldn't be further from the truth, could it?' 以及 第11段 的 'Such a perspective can be hard to discredit, can't it?'。这些 rhetorical questions 并不是真的在寻求 answers,而是通过 questioning 的形式来 reinforce 或者 challenge 某个观点。在这个 dialogue 中,女主持人使用 rhetorical questions 来引导 conversation,推动 Tony 进一步 elaborate 他的 viewpoints,同时也帮助 listeners 更好地 understand the logic behind the arguments。这种手法让整个 discussion 显得更加 interactive 和 engaging,而不是单纯的 one-way lecture。

    信号词 is it isn't it don't they doesn't it could it couldn't it can it can't it right wouldn't you say wouldn't you agree

    仿写: 当你想要在 dialogue 中 introduce 一个重要观点或者 transition to a new topic 时,可以采用 rhetorical question 的方式。首先 identify 你想要 emphasize 的 core idea,然后用 question 的形式来 present it。比如你想说 'young people value work-life balance',可以改成 'So they don't want to sacrifice their personal lives for work, do they?'。模版:'So + [statement in question form] + tag question (is it? / don't they? / couldn't it?)' 或者 '[Assumption/common belief] + isn't that right? / can it?'。注意使用 tag questions (is it, could it, can't it) 来 soften the tone,让对方有 space to elaborate。

  • 语气词

    P3 P4 P6 P7

    Dialogue 中频繁使用了 discourse markers 和 interjections,比如 'Well' (第4段)、'Yeah' (第3段)、'Right' (第7段)、'Absolutely' (第6段)。这些 conversational fillers 在书面 formal writing 中很少见,但在 spoken dialogue 中却非常 common 和 essential。它们的作用是 signal agreement(Yeah, Right, Absolutely),introduce a new point(Well),或者 acknowledge 对方的 statement before adding your own perspective。这些 markers 让整个 conversation 听起来更加 authentic 和 natural,体现了 real-life interaction 的特征。特别是 'Absolutely' 这个词,它 strongly emphasizes Tony 对于 young people's unwillingness to sacrifice personal life 的 affirmation,增强了他 argument 的 conviction。

    信号词 Well Yeah Right Absolutely Exactly Indeed Actually You know I mean So Now

    仿写: 在构建 natural dialogue 时,strategic placement of discourse markers 非常重要。使用 'Well' 来 introduce a thoughtful response 或者 slightly shift the topic;用 'Yeah/Right' 来 acknowledge 对方的 point before presenting yours;用 'Absolutely/Exactly' 来 strongly agree 并 add emphasis。模版:'Well, + [main point]' 用于 introduce new idea;'Yeah/Right, + but/and + [your addition]' 用于 agree and expand;'Absolutely/Exactly + [reinforcement of the point]' 用于 strong agreement。注意不要 overuse,每隔几句使用一次即可,placement 通常在 sentence 开头。

  • 重复

    P6 P8 P10

    文章中多次 repeat 了 'work' 和 'young people' 这两个 key concepts,特别是在 第6段 ('personal lives' vs 'work lives')、第8段 ('work hours' 和 'time off')、第10段 ('work for eight hours' 和 'quality of the work') 中。这种 lexical repetition 不是简单的 redundancy,而是 strategic emphasis。通过 repeatedly using 相同或相关的 terms,dialogue 不断 reinforce 核心 themes:work-life balance 和 productivity measurement。特别是 第6段 中 'personal lives' 和 'work lives' 的 parallel structure 和 repetition,清晰地 contrast 了 two aspects of life,强化了 young people 不愿意 sacrifice 其中一个的观点。第10段 中 'work' 作为动词和名词的 repeated use 帮助 build the argument about productivity measurement。

    仿写: 当你想要 emphasize a key concept 或者 create thematic coherence 时,可以 strategically repeat core vocabulary。方法是:首先 identify 你的 central theme(比如 work-life balance),然后在不同的 contexts 中 reintroduce related terms。使用 parallel structures 来 enhance the effect,比如 'X life' vs 'Y life','X time' vs 'Y time'。模版:'They value their [concept A] + but also their [concept A]' 或者 'not just [noun phrase with keyword] but [noun phrase with same keyword in different context]'。注意让 repetition appear natural,通过 varying the context 和 sentence structures 来避免 mechanical redundancy。

  • 省略

    P2 P6

    Dialogue 中存在多处 ellipsis,体现了 spoken English 的 informal nature。比如 第2段 中 'Not really' 是完整句 'That's not really justified' 的 elliptical response,省略了已经在 context 中 established 的内容。第6段 中 'Absolutely' 也是 elliptical agreement,完整表达应该是 'Absolutely, they don't want to defer happiness'。这种 ellipsis 让 dialogue 更加 concise 和 natural,因为在 face-to-face conversation 中,speakers 不需要 repeat 已经 established 的 information。这些 elliptical responses 依赖于 shared context between speakers,体现了 conversation 的 collaborative nature,同时也让 exchange 更加 dynamic 和 efficient。

    仿写: 在写作 dialogue 时,可以用 ellipsis 来 create natural conversational rhythm。当 responding to a question 或者 statement,如果 full context 已经 clear,可以用 short elliptical answers 而不是 complete sentences。模版:Q: '[Full question with clear subject and predicate]?' A: 'Absolutely/Not really/Exactly.' 或者 A: '[Key word/phrase from question].' 比如 Q: 'Do you think this approach works?' A: 'Definitely.' (instead of 'I definitely think this approach works.')。使用时注意 context clarity:只有当 omitted information 能够被 easily recovered 时才使用 ellipsis,否则会造成 confusion。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

11 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 年轻人工作态度被误解

    P1
    We often hear young people today have a poor work ethic. That's not really justified though, is it?

    否定类+模糊限制语 not really justified not really not exactly not quite not necessarily not entirely hardly

    女主持人 raise 了一个 common stereotype——年轻人 work ethic 差,但她用 not really justified 来 signal 她 disagrees with 这个 stereotype。这个 implication 是:表面的 perception 和 reality 存在 gap,为后续 M 的 clarification 做了 setup。它对 main idea 的 value 在于 frame 整个 conversation 的 premise:我们需要 re-examine 对年轻人的 misconceptions,理解他们真实的 work values。

  • 年轻人群体的多样性被忽视

    P2
    In reality, young people of this age group are as varied and multifaceted as any other generation.

    对比类 In reality in reality in fact actually in truth the truth is in practice

    M 用 in reality 来 emphasize:年轻人并非 homogeneous group with uniform poor work ethic,而是 as diverse as 任何 generation。这个 implication 是 challenge generalization,指出 stereotyping 的 logical flaw。它对 dialogue theme 的 contribution 是 establish foundation:要 work with 年轻人,必须 recognize their diversity 而非 apply blanket judgments。

  • 管理者需要实际行动而非仅认识问题

    P3
    Yeah, but if you are struggling to work with young people in your workspace, what can you do?

    转折类 but however yet still nevertheless nonetheless even so

    W 用 but 来 pivot conversation from acknowledging diversity 到 addressing practical challenge。这个 implication 是:understanding alone 不够,managers need practical strategies。它对 main idea 的 role 是 transition device,将 dialogue 从 correcting misconceptions 推进到 providing actionable guidance,这正是 conversation 的 central purpose。

  • 工作生活平衡是核心价值观

    P4
    It's also really important to recognize the way young people want to balance their work life with their personal life.

    情态词+强调类 It's also really important it's essential it's crucial it's vital it's critical it's really important it's absolutely necessary

    M 用 really important 来 stress work-life balance 对年轻人的 centrality。这个 implication 是:managers 若 ignore 这点会 fail to connect。它对 main theme 的 significance 在于 identify 一个 defining characteristic of young workforce,这个 characteristic 是 understanding 和 managing 他们的 key,直接 relates to dialogue 的 central message about aligning management approach with young people's values。

  • 年轻人拒绝传统的延迟满足观

    P5
    So they generally don't want to defer happiness in return for career advancement?

    推理类 So so therefore thus hence consequently as a result

    W 用 so 来 draw inference:如果年轻人 prioritize work-life balance,那意味着他们 reject traditional career model of sacrificing present for future。这个 implication 揭示了 fundamental value shift。它对 dialogue purpose 的 contribution 是 articulate 年轻一代和 older generations 在 career philosophy 上的 core difference,这个 difference 是 generational friction 的 root cause,也是 managers 需要 adapt 的 reason。

  • 被误读为不愿努力工作

    P6
    this leads people to equate that with an unwillingness to work hard

    因果推理类 this leads people to equate this leads to this results in this causes this makes people think people equate this with this is interpreted as

    M 用这个 causal explanation 来 show:年轻人 prioritizing personal life 被 wrongly interpreted as laziness。这个 implication 是 expose perception gap between intent 和 interpretation。它对 main message 的 value 在于 explain why misconceptions exist,帮助 managers understand 为什么他们的 assumptions 是 flawed,这是 changing mindset 的 necessary step。

  • 真相与误解截然相反

    P7
    But that couldn't be further from the truth, could it?

    强化否定类+反问句 couldn't be further from the truth couldn't be more wrong nothing could be less true quite the opposite far from it the exact opposite is true

    W 用这个 emphatic denial 来 underscore:认为年轻人不努力工作是 fundamentally wrong。Tag question 'could it' seeks M's agreement,strengthening the refutation。这个 implication 对 dialogue 的 function 是 emphatic pivot point,完全 reject stereotype 并为 presenting true picture of young workers' dedication 创造 space,directly supporting the conversation's goal of correcting misconceptions。

  • 工作时间内高效但重视边界

    P8
    Young people will work extremely hard during their defined work hours, but they expect to have their time off, like weekends and nights free from work.

    转折类+期待表达 but they expect but they require but they demand in return they want but they insist on however they need

    M 用这个 but structure 来 clarify:年轻人的 commitment 是 conditional,他们 work hard 但 require clear boundaries。这个 implication 是年轻人 redefine work contract——从 unlimited availability 到 defined hours of intense work。它对 main point 的 relevance 在于 explain 年轻人的 work philosophy:high quality within boundaries rather than endless availability,这是 managers 必须 respect 的 new paradigm。

  • 传统时长衡量标准无效

    P10
    their productivity should not be measured by the number of hours they work, since someone can work for eight hours and accomplish next to nothing of significance for the company

    因果解释类 since because as for due to given that seeing that

    M 用 since clause 来 expose time-based measurement 的 logical flaw:hours worked 和 actual contribution 可以 completely disconnect。这个 implication 是 challenge fundamental assumption of traditional productivity assessment。它对 dialogue theme 的 contribution 在于 articulate 年轻人对 productivity 的 alternative definition,这个 redefinition 是 managers 需要 adopt 的 new evaluation framework,directly addressing how to assess young workers fairly。

  • 渴望意义感的诉求难以否定

    P11
    Such a perspective can be hard to discredit, can't it?

    反问句+让步类 can't it isn't it hard to deny hard to discredit difficult to dismiss hard to argue against can hardly be disputed

    W 用这个 concessive question 来 acknowledge:年轻人想要 meaningful work 而非 merely being a cog in machine 是 legitimate aspiration。这个 implication 是这个 desire 有 inherent validity,值得 serious consideration。它对 conversation purpose 的 role 是 transition to discussing how managers should respond to this valid need,leading to M's advice about legitimizing work and value alignment,completing the picture of understanding young workers。

  • 价值观匹配决定留任意愿

    P12
    They must feel the need to stay working at a company whose values align with their own.

    情态词+强制性 must have to need to it's necessary to require it's essential that cannot work without

    M 用 must 来 emphasize:value alignment 不是 nice-to-have 而是 prerequisite for retention。这个 implication 是如果 company values 和 personal values misalign,年轻人 will leave。它对 dialogue main idea 的 significance 在于 highlight strategic imperative for companies:要 retain young talent,必须 provide meaningful work aligned with values,这是 concluding advice,summarizing how managers must fundamentally rethink retention strategy。

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

10 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 的常见问题

2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
对话讨论了管理者如何通过理解年轻员工的价值观来更好地与他们共事,特别是他们对工作与生活平衡的重视、以质量而非工时衡量生产力,以及对与个人价值观一致的有意义工作的渴望。(英文表述:The dialogue discusses how managers can better work with young employees by understanding their values, particularly their emphasis on work-life balance, productivity measured by quality rather than hours, and desire for meaningful work aligned with personal values.)
2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 328 词、13 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 233 篇(占 39%)。
2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 13 段按对话骨架分为 6 个意群:第1段、第2段——开场引入话题;第3段、第4段——识别管理难题并给出核心建议;第5段、第6段、第7段、第8段——阐释工作生活平衡观;第9段、第10段——重新定义生产力评估标准;第11段、第12段——强调工作意义感的重要性;第13段——对话礼貌性收尾。
2025年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section A (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:multifaceted(多方面的;多层面的)、defer(推迟;延后)、equate(等同于;将...视为等同)、discredit(质疑;否定...的可信度)、legitimize(使合法化;赋予正当性),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: