2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist
CET-4 · 来自 2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 · Part III Section C (1) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist

《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》 —— 2016年6月英语四级真题第1套文章逐层精读

2015年 10月 31 日刊登在 QUARTZ 网站上的一篇标题为“Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist”(《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》)的文章。

本页是 2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 350 词、10 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语四级文章中占 46%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

10 段英文原文

以下为2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 10 段。左侧 P1–P10 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly sophisticated, there are growing concerns that robots could become a threat. This danger can be avoided, according to computer science professor Stuart Russell, if we figure out how to turn human values into a programmable code.

Russell argues that as robots take on more complicated tasks, it's necessary to translate our morals into AI language.

For example, if a robot does chores around the house, you wouldn't want it to put the pet cat in the oven to make dinner for the hungry children. "You would want that robot preloaded with a good set of values," said Russell.

Some robots are already programmed with basic human values. For example, mobile robots have been programmed to keep a comfortable distance from humans. Obviously there are cultural differences, but if you were talking to another person and they came up close in your personal space, you wouldn't think that's the kind of thing a properly brought-up person would do.

It will be possible to create more sophisticated moral machines, if only we can find a way to set out human values as clear rules.

Robots could also learn values from drawing patterns from large sets of data on human behavior. They are dangerous only if programmers are careless.

The biggest concern with robots going against human values is that human beings fail to do sufficient testing and they've produced a system that will break some kind of taboo(禁忌).

One simple check would be to program a robot to check the correct course of action with a human when presented with an unusual situation.

If the robot is unsure whether an animal is suitable for the microwave, it has the opportunity to stop, send out beeps(嘟嘟声), and ask for directions from a human. If we humans aren't quite sure about a decision, we go and ask somebody else.

The most difficult step in programming values will be deciding exactly what we believe is moral, and how to create a set of ethical rules. But if we come up with an answer, robots could be good for humanity.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

10 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The AI Threat and Its Solution

    AI robots pose potential threats, but programming human values into them can prevent this danger.

    作为article的opening,这个paragraph establish了整篇文章的discourse framework。它introduce了central concern about AI threats,同时preview了文章将要explore的solution direction——programming values。这为subsequent paragraphs提供了argumentative foundation,让readers understand为什么需要discuss如何把morals translate into AI language。

    识别问题陈述与解决方案陈述
  2. P2

    The Need for Moral Translation

    As robots handle increasingly complex tasks, we must translate human morals into AI-understandable language.

    这个paragraph serve as一个transitional bridge,它take 第1段的general solution并make it more concrete。通过emphasize task complexity和translation necessity之间的causal link,它strengthen了main argument的logical foundation。这个paragraph为subsequent examples和detailed explanations做好了setup,让readers准备好understand具体的implementation challenges。

    提取因果关系中的行动要求
  3. P3

    Example: The Cat-in-Oven Scenario

    A concrete example shows that robots need preloaded values to avoid making harmful decisions when performing household tasks.

    这个paragraph通过concrete illustration来reinforce之前的abstract argument。Cat-in-oven example让第2段提到的'translate morals'这个necessity变得tangible和urgent。它demonstrate了without proper values,robots会make decisions that technically achieve goals但morally unacceptable。这strengthen了entire argument by showing not just why we need values,but what happens if we don't implement them properly。

    从例证中提取论证目的
  4. P4

    Current Examples of Value Programming

    Current robots already demonstrate feasibility by being programmed with basic human values like maintaining personal space.

    这个paragraph serve crucial function of grounding the argument in reality。After presenting problem和solution idea,这里provide concrete proof that solution already partially exists。它demonstrate feasibility,回答potential skepticism about whether values can actually be programmed。同时,'basic'这个descriptor也subtly remind readers还需要develop more sophisticated implementations,为后续discussion铺路。

    定位现实证据及其论证作用
  5. P5

    The Challenge of Rule Articulation

    Creating sophisticated moral machines is achievable if we can articulate human values as clear, explicit rules.

    这个paragraph function as pivotal bridge between current state和future possibilities。它acknowledge 第4段展示的achievements,但push discussion forward by pointing out need for advancement。'If only'structure既表达optimism又identify obstacle,为subsequent paragraphs about how to overcome this challenge做好setup。它maintain argumentative momentum while keeping discussion realistic。

    解构条件句中的可能与限制
  6. P6

    Data-Driven Value Learning

    Robots can learn values through data pattern analysis, and pose danger only when programmers are careless.

    这个paragraph expand solution space by introducing machine learning approach,complementing前面的rule-based method。它address 第5段的challenge by suggesting不需要explicitly articulate所有rules,可以let robots learn from data。同时,'only if careless'这个reassurance balance了第1段的initial concern,show danger是manageable的。这demonstrate solution的flexibility and feasibility。

    整合新方法与安全限定
  7. P7

    Root Cause: Insufficient Testing

    The primary risk of robots violating human values stems from insufficient testing by human programmers.

    这个paragraph perform important function of deepening problem analysis。它take general concern about AI threats并pinpoint specific failure point——testing inadequacy。这reframe problem in way that makes solution clearer:不需要fundamentally change robots,需要improve human processes。它set up后续paragraphs about具体testing measures,使argument more actionable和practical。

    从表象追溯至根本原因
  8. P8

    Human Consultation Mechanism

    A simple safety measure is programming robots to consult humans when facing unusual situations.

    这个paragraph provide concrete answer to 第7段的concern about insufficient testing。通过proposing human consultation mechanism,它demonstrate如何在design level build in safety。这个solution elegant because it doesn't require perfect initial programming—it acknowledges limitations并create fallback。It strengthen overall argument by showing practical implementable measures exist to address identified risks。

    提取方案的触发条件与行动
  9. P9

    Human-Robot Analogy in Decision-Making

    Just as humans consult others when uncertain, robots should be programmed to seek human guidance in unclear situations, preventing errors like putting animals in microwaves.

    这个paragraph通过dual strategy强化solution:回顾earlier dramatic example并introduce human analogy。它make 第8段的abstract proposal concrete and relatable。Human-seeking-advice analogy特别effective因为它frame robot consultation不是weakness而是智能的sign。这paragraph close the loop on cat-in-oven problem while making solution feel natural和reasonable,strengthening overall persuasiveness of the argument。

    提取类比论证的双向映射
  10. P10

    Conclusion: Challenge and Promise

    Despite the difficulty of defining moral values, successfully programming them into robots could benefit humanity.

    作为conclusion,这个paragraph fulfill multiple functions:acknowledge greatest remaining challenge,synthesize entire argument,并end on hopeful note。它honestly admit programming values的difficulty,这add credibility。但through'could be good for humanity',它remind readers为什么这project worth pursuing。这circle back to 第1段的concern about threats,但end by suggesting proper implementation能transform threat into benefit,providing satisfying argumentative closure。

    平衡挑战承认与前景展望
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

10 道逐段细节自检题

针对2016年6月英语四级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 Stuart Russell danger

    According to Stuart Russell, how can the danger posed by robots be avoided?

    • A By making robots less sophisticated.
    • B By preventing robots from doing complicated tasks.
    • C By translating human values into programmable code.
    • D By allowing robots to make moral choices independently.
    • E By replacing human values with computer language.
    • F By making people less concerned about robots.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项完整对应作者的解决方案:以 human values 为内容,以 programmable code 为承载形式,正面回答 how。障碍在于题干和选项把原文 turn ... into 改写成 translating ... into,考查同义改写识别,而非机械匹配原词。

    人名后三词链 时间极紧时,直接在 第1段 扫描人名 Stuart Russell,不必从头细读。随后只读其后含 if 的条件结构,把题干的 how 压缩成“风险—转化—代码”的三词链;在选项中选择能保留这条链的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 AI language necessary

    Why does Russell consider it necessary to translate human morals into AI language?

    • A Because robots have already learned all human values.
    • B Because AI language is easier than human language.
    • C Because people no longer need to make moral decisions.
    • D Because robots are taking on increasingly complicated tasks.
    • E Because household chores are too difficult for humans.
    • F Because cultural differences have disappeared.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项准确改写 as robots take on more complicated tasks 所表达的原因,其中 increasingly complicated 对应 more complicated。命题障碍是把原因从原句前部抽离,并要求考生区分“为什么有必要”和“需要采取什么措施”。

    必要性左因 在 第2段 中,不逐词翻译,直接抓 necessary 左侧的 as 从句。把它视为“必要性触发器”,再在选项中寻找能概括该触发器的正确项;其余仅含 morals 或 AI language 等词面重合的选项先降级处理。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 chores good set of values

    What does Russell imply a household robot should have before doing chores?

    • A Instructions to cook dinner for children as quickly as possible.
    • B The ability to treat every animal as food.
    • C A rule to place pets in the oven.
    • D A larger database of cooking recipes.
    • E A good set of values preloaded into its system.
    • F Permission to ignore the needs of hungry children.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项保留了 good set of values 与 preloaded 两个关键限制:不仅要有 values,而且这些价值观在执行任务之前已经被装入系统。干扰障碍在于例子中的 dinner、children 和 oven 等画面信息更加醒目,容易使考生忽略例证后的评价句。

    跳例抓评价 在 第3段 中,可跳过夸张例子的具体画面,直扫引号内的评价句,优先锁定 would want 后面的名词结构。再用题干中的 before 过滤事中或事后信息,保留对应预装概念的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 mobile robots comfortable distance

    What basic human value have some mobile robots been programmed to respect?

    • A Avoiding all contact with humans.
    • B Following identical cultural rules everywhere.
    • C Cooking meals for nearby people.
    • D Asking humans for permission before moving.
    • E Making people feel uncomfortable in public spaces.
    • F Keeping a comfortable distance from people.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项直接概括已被 programmed 的行为,并以 people 对应原文 humans。障碍是原文随后补充 cultural differences,考生容易把限定性背景误当成机器人被编程遵守的具体规则。

    编程后抓动作 在 第4段 中,锁定 mobile robots 后,只读 programmed 后面的第一个动作结构,不必细读后续文化评论。把题干的 respect 理解为“遵守某种行为边界”,再选择范围恰当且与该动作等值的正确项。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 more sophisticated moral machines clear rules

    What is required to create more sophisticated moral machines?

    • A A way to express human values as clear rules.
    • B The removal of all moral rules.
    • C More robots doing household chores.
    • D A complete end to cultural differences.
    • E Robots that can make every decision alone.
    • F A larger number of hungry children.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项把 set out human values as clear rules 的必要条件完整改写出来。障碍在于题干问 required,而其他选项可能混入可行前景、数据来源或测试步骤;只有该项对应 if only 引出的实现门槛。

    只读if后 锁定 第5段 后,直接把 if only 后面的内容当作答案候选,不处理 possible 的修辞作用。把候选压缩为“价值观—清晰规则”,在选项中寻找语义等值的正确项即可。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 dangerous programmers are careless

    Under what condition are robots considered dangerous?

    • A When they learn from large sets of data.
    • B When programmers are careless.
    • C When they perform any human task.
    • D When their data sets become too small.
    • E When humans keep a comfortable distance.
    • F When they are given a good set of values.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项精确对应 only if programmers are careless,把机器人的危险限定在程序员粗心这一条件下。障碍是前一句提到 large sets of data,容易诱导考生把数据量或学习方式误认为危险条件。

    only if强度尺 在 第6段,优先盯住 dangerous 后的 only if,暂时忽略前半句对 data 的说明。用“only if = 仅当”作为强度尺,凡是把风险扩大到任何任务或正常学习的选项先删除,剩下对应限定条件的正确项。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 biggest concern testing

    What is identified as the biggest concern about robots violating human values?

    • A Robots becoming unwilling to follow any instruction.
    • B Cultural differences among robot users.
    • C Insufficient human testing that allows a system to break a taboo.
    • D Robots asking humans too many questions.
    • E The lack of enough data on human behavior.
    • F The use of too many ethical rules.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项保留 fail to do sufficient testing 与 break some kind of taboo 的因果链。障碍是把人类的 testing failure 压缩为名词短语,并把两个分句合并为原因—后果结构,考查考生能否完整识别风险机制。

    三格因果链 直接在 第7段 找 biggest concern,随后从 is that 后面提取主干,不纠结 they've 的口语缩略形式。用“谁失误—失误是什么—后果是什么”三格速记,能够填满三格的正确项即为答案。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 unusual situation check

    What simple safeguard is suggested for a robot facing an unusual situation?

    • A It should follow its original instruction without hesitation.
    • B It should create a new ethical rule by itself.
    • C It should keep a greater distance from all humans.
    • D It should check the proper action with a human.
    • E It should collect more data before contacting anyone.
    • F It should stop working permanently.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项保留 check、course of action 和 human 之间的关键关系,是对建议的准确同义改写。障碍在于把 correct course of action 换成 proper action,考查语义识别,而非原词机械匹配。

    异常双要素 在 第8段,见到 unusual situation 后立即向左找 program,向右找 check,不读其他扩展信息。把答案压缩为“异常时—向人核对”,选项中双要素同时出现的正确项就是答案。

  9. 第 9 段 定位词 unsure microwave

    What can a robot do when it is unsure about an animal's suitability for the microwave?

    • A It can put the animal in the microwave to test the result.
    • B It can decide that every animal is unsuitable.
    • C It can silently continue its usual chores.
    • D It can replace the human with a larger data set.
    • E It can stop and ask a human for directions.
    • F It can program new values for its owner.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项抓住 stop 与 ask for directions from a human 两个核心步骤,准确概括安全流程。障碍是原文还包含 send out beeps,命题人借此考查考生能否分清沟通信号与获得人工指导这一流程目的。

    动词串折叠 在 第9段,利用 microwave 单点定位后,只读 unsure 之后的并列动词串。把三个动作按功能折叠为“暂停 + 发信号 + 求助”,选择保留首尾核心动作的正确项,不被 beeps 这一中间细节牵制。

  10. 第 10 段 定位词 most difficult step programming values

    What will be the most difficult step in programming values into robots?

    • A Teaching robots to do more complicated tasks.
    • B Making robots beneficial to humanity immediately.
    • C Giving robots the ability to send out beeps.
    • D Eliminating every cultural difference among humans.
    • E Preventing robots from asking humans for directions.
    • F Deciding what is moral and forming a set of ethical rules.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项完整对应两个并列难点:deciding exactly what we believe is moral 与 create a set of ethical rules。障碍在于答案同时包含价值判断和规则建构,漏掉任何一环都会把复杂难题过度简化。

    But前双并列 在 第10段,找到 most difficult step 后只截取逗号至 But 之前的信息。把并列结构压缩为“定道德 + 建规则”,凡是只说技术、收益或前文例子的选项立即排除,留下正确项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    AI威胁与解决方案的提出

    这个 opening paragraph 提出了 central concern:随着 AI becomes sophisticated,robots 可能 pose a threat,但 Stuart Russell 教授指出可以通过 programming human values 来 avoid this danger

    这个 introductory section 建立了整篇文章的 foundation,明确了 the threat of AI 以及 the necessity of programming values,为后续 elaborate on solutions 做好铺垫

    直接提出核心问题和解决方向
  2. 分论点 P2 P3

    道德翻译的必要性论证

    这组 paragraphs 通过 Russell's argument 和 concrete example(cat in the oven)来 demonstrate why translating morals into AI language is necessary when robots handle complicated tasks,强调 preloading values 的重要性

    这个 supporting section 通过 logical reasoning 和 vivid example 来 justify the thesis,让读者 understand why programming human values is essential,从而 strengthen the argument's persuasiveness

    论证编程价值观的必要性
  3. 分论点 P4 P5 P6

    现有价值编程的实践与拓展

    这组 paragraphs 展示 basic human values 已经在 some robots 中 implemented(如 keeping comfortable distance),然后 extend the argument 指出 creating more sophisticated moral machines is possible if we can define clear rules,并提出 learning from data 的补充方法

    这个 section 通过 existing practices 和 future possibilities 来 demonstrate feasibility,从 'why we need it' 推进到 'how it can be done',使 the argument 更加 comprehensive and convincing

    证明价值观编程的可行性
  4. 分论点 P7 P8 P9

    风险防范的具体措施

    这组 paragraphs 聚焦 potential dangers 和 preventive measures:指出 the biggest concern 是 insufficient testing 导致 breaking taboos,然后 propose specific solutions 比如 checking with humans when facing unusual situations,用 microwave example 来 illustrate this safety mechanism

    这个 section 通过 addressing potential risks 和 offering practical safeguards 来 make the argument more balanced and credible,showing that programming values 不仅 possible 而且可以通过 human oversight 来 ensure safety

    提供人类监督的具体方法
  5. 结论 P10

    挑战承认与积极展望

    这个 concluding paragraph 承认 the most difficult step 是 defining moral values 和 creating ethical rules,但用 conditional optimism(if we come up with an answer)来 end on a positive note,强调 robots could be good for humanity

    这个 conclusion 通过 acknowledging the challenge 来 show realistic thinking,同时 maintaining hopeful outlook 来 reinforce the thesis that programming human values 是 worthwhile pursuit,给读者留下 balanced yet optimistic impression

    承认难度但保持乐观态度
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

6 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 6 步按2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首段问题方案定位 P1

    首段通常先陈述一个concern或者phenomenon,然后马上给出作者的counter-argument或者solution,这种'问题+方案'的结构就是主旨的雏形。

  2. 作者观点动词标记 P2

    只要出现argue、believe、claim这类动词,就意味着后面的内容是作者的观点而非客观事实,这正是议论文主旨的核心来源。

  3. 例证呼应验证 P3 P4 P9

    议论文中的例子不是随便举的,每一个example都是为了illustrate前面提出的观点,如果多个例子指向同一个方向,说明这就是文章反复强调的主旨。

  4. 条件让步提炼 P5 P6 P7 P8

    议论文常常会用concession先承认困难,再用条件句给出解决办法,这个'虽然...但是'的结构恰好对应主旨中while challenges exist这一部分。

  5. 尾段呼应确认 P10

    议论文的结尾段常常会用总结性句子回扣首段的观点,如果尾段和首段的核心意思一致,就能confirm这就是全文真正的主旨。

  6. 这套流程之所以高效,是因为议论文的结构本身就是首尾呼应加中间层层support,只要抓住这几个关键节点,就不需要通读全文的每一个detail。

主旨信号词 argues P2 concerns P1 if only P5 could P10 But P10

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

为防止人工智能机器人威胁人类,我们必须为其编程人类价值观和道德规范。尽管在定义和编码伦理方面存在挑战,机器人可以通过预编程的价值观、数据分析以及面对不确定情况时的人类监督来学习适当的行为。
To prevent AI robots from threatening humanity, we must program them with human values and morals. While challenges exist in defining and coding ethics, robots can learn appropriate behavior through pre-programmed values, data analysis, and human oversight when facing uncertain situations.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • sophisticated 复杂精密的;先进的;高级的

    我们来把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,从 cause-and-effect relationship 看,AI 的这种特质导致了 potential threats,说明它已经发展到一个相当高的 level。其次,文中明确将 sophisticated moral machines 与 basic values 进行 contrast,这个 explicit comparison 告诉我们该词表示「非基础的、更高级的」。最后,词根 sophistic- 本身就带有 wisdom 和 knowledge 的含义。将这三条 evidence 结合,我们可以确信这个词描述的是某种 advanced、complex、refined 的状态。

    逻辑关系+全文追踪+构词印证
  • translate 转换;转化;翻译

    让我们整合这些 evidence。首先,from...into 这个 syntactic structure 明确标示了一个 transformation process,从 one form 到 another form。其次,作者用 turn into 和 translate into 作为 synonymous expressions 来阐述同一个 idea,这是非常 powerful 的 contextual clue。最后,prefix trans- 本身就携带着 crossing boundaries 的含义。三条线索共同指向一个核心 meaning:将某物从一种形式转换到另一种形式。在这个 specific context 中,就是把 human morals 转换成 machine-readable code。

    句法模式+同义平行+方向前缀
  • preload 预先装载;预装

    这个词的 inference 相对 straightforward。从 context 看,为了防止 robot 犯错,必须在它 start operating 之前就给它 install values,这个 preventive measure 的 timing 是关键。从 word formation 看,pre- + load 的组合非常 transparent,两个 components 的 meanings 直接相加就得出了 compound word 的含义。两条 evidence 完全 align,都指向「提前装载、预先加载」这个 concept。

    拆解组合+时序验证
  • taboo 禁忌;忌讳;严禁之事

    让我们 connect the dots。首先,从 consequence perspective,breaking taboo 被描述为 biggest concern,说明这是 extremely serious matter。Break 这个 verb 的使用表明 taboo 是某种 rule 或 boundary。其次,在整个 discourse 中,taboo 出现在讨论 values、morals、ethics 的 context 里,但用了更强烈的 tone (biggest concern, break)。这暗示 taboo 可能比 general moral rules 更 stringent,是 absolutely forbidden things。综合来看,taboo 指的应该是社会中被严格禁止的、不可触犯的 things or behaviors。

    语义网络+搭配强度+语用严重性
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

7 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P3

    作者用了 a specific scenario 来 illustrate 一个潜在的 ethical dilemma:robot 可能会把 pet cat 放进 oven 来给饥饿的 children 做饭。这个 extreme example 非常 vivid,让读者立刻 understand 为什么 robots 需要被 preloaded with human values。通过这个 concrete case,作者把抽象的 moral programming 问题变得 tangible and urgent,强化了文章的 central argument:AI 必须理解 human values 才能避免 catastrophic mistakes。

    信号词 for example for instance such as like to illustrate take...as an example consider the case of imagine that

    仿写: 当你要 argue 一个 abstract point 时,问自己:what concrete situation 能 demonstrate this?选择的 example 要足够 specific 和 vivid,让读者能 visualize the scenario。模板:For example/instance, if [具体情境], [可能的后果]. You wouldn't want [不期望的结果]. 比如写 AI safety:'For instance, if an autonomous vehicle prioritizes speed over caution, it might run a red light to save time, endangering pedestrians.'

  • 举例论证

    P4

    作者用 mobile robots 保持 comfortable distance 这个 existing practice 来 prove 基本的 human values 已经可以被 programmed into robots。接着用 personal space 的 cultural norm 作为 parallel example,帮助 readers understand 什么是 appropriate behavior。这两个 examples 共同 demonstrate 当前的 AI programming 已经有了 value-based design 的 foundation,为后文讨论 more sophisticated moral machines 铺垫,支撑了文章 optimistic tone。

    信号词 for example for instance such as like to illustrate take...as an example consider the case of imagine that

    仿写: 使用 current practices 或 existing technology 作为 examples 可以增强 credibility。结构可以是:Some [主体] are already [在做某事]. For example, [具体例子]. 然后用 everyday analogy 来 reinforce the point:Obviously [承认复杂性], but if [日常情境], you wouldn't think [不当行为]. 比如:'Some hospitals already use AI diagnostic tools. For example, image recognition systems detect tumors in X-rays. Obviously accuracy varies, but if a doctor made diagnoses without reviewing patient history, you wouldn't consider that responsible practice.'

  • 举例论证

    P9

    作者继续用 microwave and animal 这个 specific scenario 来 illustrate 他提出的 solution:robot 应该在 uncertain situations 时 seek human guidance。这个 callback 到 第3段 的 cat-in-oven example,形成 thematic continuity,但这次 focus 在 robot's response mechanism 而非 problem itself。通过这个 practical example,作者 demonstrate 了一个 feasible safeguard,让 abstract solution 变得 implementable,增强了 argument 的 practicality。

    信号词 for example for instance such as like to illustrate take...as an example consider the case of imagine that

    仿写: 当你要 argue 一个 abstract point 时,问自己:what concrete situation 能 demonstrate this?选择的 example 要足够 specific 和 vivid,让读者能 visualize the scenario。模板:For example/instance, if [具体情境], [可能的后果]. You wouldn't want [不期望的结果]. 比如写 AI safety:'For instance, if an autonomous vehicle prioritizes speed over caution, it might run a red light to save time, endangering pedestrians.'

  • 类比论证

    P9

    作者把 robots seeking human guidance 和 humans asking for advice 进行 parallel comparison:'If we humans aren't quite sure about a decision, we go and ask somebody else.' 这个 analogy 把 robot behavior 和 human behavior 画上 equal sign,暗示给 robots 装上 consultation mechanism 是 natural and reasonable 的。通过这个 human-robot parallel,作者 normalize 了 AI uncertainty handling,让 solution 显得不是 adding complexity,而是 replicating proven human strategy,增强了 acceptability。

    信号词 just as like similarly in the same way analogous to comparable to parallel to likewise correspondingly

    仿写: 寻找 structural similarities between your topic and something familiar。模板:Just as/like [熟悉的事物] does [行为], [你的主体] should/could [相似行为]. 或用 parallel structure:If [主体A] [行为], [主体B] can [相似行为]. 比如讨论 AI learning:'Just as children learn social norms through observation and correction, AI systems can develop appropriate behavior through supervised learning and feedback loops.' 关键是找到 meaningful parallel,不只是 surface similarity。

  • 因果论证

    P1 P2 P5 P6 P7

    文章开篇就建立 causal chain:AI becoming sophisticated (cause) → growing concerns about robot threat (effect) → need to program human values (solution)。这个 cause-effect logic 贯穿全文,构建了 argument 的 backbone。第2段 的 'as robots take on more complicated tasks' 是 cause,'it's necessary to translate morals' 是 effect。第6段 说 'they are dangerous only if programmers are careless',建立 conditional causality。整个 causal framework 让文章的 solution (programming values) 显得 logically inevitable,而非 arbitrary suggestion。

    信号词 because since as due to owing to as a result therefore thus consequently hence so leads to causes results in if...then only if

    仿写: 明确 identify cause and effect,然后用 causal markers 连接。常用结构:Because/Since/As [原因], [结果]. 或倒装:[结果] because/due to/as a result of [原因]. 对于 conditional causality 用:If [条件], then [结果]. Only if [条件] will [结果]. 比如:'As online education becomes mainstream, traditional universities must adapt their teaching methods. Only if they integrate digital tools effectively will they remain competitive.' 注意 distinguish correlation from causation,确保 causal link 是 logical。

  • 引用论证

    P1 P2 P3

    作者 cite Stuart Russell 这个 computer science professor 作为 authority,通过 'according to' 和直接引语 'You would want that robot preloaded with a good set of values' 来增强 credibility。引用 expert opinion 不只是 present information,更重要的是 借助 Russell 的 professional standing 来 legitimize 整个 argument。这个 authoritative voice 让文章的 claims 从 personal opinion 升级为 expert-backed position,特别对于 technical topic like AI programming,expert citation 能 significantly boost persuasiveness。

    信号词 according to as [expert] states/argues/points out says said notes claims argues that research shows studies indicate evidence suggests

    仿写: 选择 relevant and credible authorities,明确 introduce their credentials。结构:According to [专家/机构], [观点]. 或 [专家], a [头衔] at [机构], argues/states/points out that [观点]. 可以用 direct quote 增强 impact:'[直接引语],' said [专家]. 比如:'According to Dr. Jane Smith, a neuroscientist at MIT, brain plasticity continues throughout adulthood. "The brain constantly rewires itself based on experience," she explains.' 确保 citation 直接 support your argument,不是 tangential。

  • 对比论证

    P4 P6 P7

    第6段 和 第7段 形成 implicit contrast:robots learning from data (positive potential) vs. robots breaking taboos due to insufficient testing (negative risk)。第4段 中也有 subtle contrast:'there are cultural differences' 承认 variation,但接着用 'but' 转折,强调 universal principle of personal space。这些 contrasts 不是 binary opposition,而是 showing different facets or scenarios 来 present balanced view。通过 juxtaposing possibilities and dangers,作者 acknowledge complexity while maintaining optimistic stance,让 argument 显得 nuanced and credible。

    信号词 but however while whereas in contrast on the other hand conversely unlike different from rather than instead

    仿写: 明确 identify what you're contrasting 和 why。可以用 explicit markers:While/Whereas [A], [B]. In contrast to [A], [B]. On one hand [A], on the other hand [B]. 或用 implicit structure:describe A in one sentence/paragraph,然后 describe B with parallel structure. 比如:'While traditional manufacturing relies on human precision, automated systems achieve consistency through programmed accuracy. However, human workers adapt to unexpected situations, whereas machines require pre-programmed responses.' 确保 contrast serves your argument,不是 just pointing out differences。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

9 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • AI威胁可以避免但需要条件

    P1
    This danger can be avoided, according to computer science professor Stuart Russell, if we figure out how to turn human values into a programmable code.

    情态词类 can be avoided could become can find would want wouldn't want may happen might lead to

    表面上这句话说 AI danger 可以被避免,但通过 modal verb 情态词 can 和条件从句 if we figure out,作者实际传递的 implication 言外之意是:当前我们 haven't figured it out yet 还没搞清楚怎么做,AI threat 是 real and present 真实且现实存在的,避免危险需要 active effort 积极努力而非 automatic 自动发生。这为全文主旨奠定了 urgency 紧迫性基调,强调 programming human values 编程人类价值观是 critical prerequisite 关键前提,而不是 optional feature 可选特性。

  • 宠物猫案例的荒谬对比

    P3
    if a robot does chores around the house, you wouldn't want it to put the pet cat in the oven to make dinner for the hungry children.

    否定情态词类 wouldn't want wouldn't think shouldn't happen couldn't accept wouldn't expect shouldn't allow mustn't ignore

    表面上这是个 bizarre example 奇怪例子,但 underlying implication 潜在含义是:没有 proper values 恰当价值观的 AI 会 interpret instructions 解读指令时采用 literal logic 字面逻辑而忽略 common sense 常识和 ethical boundaries 伦理界限。这个 extreme case 极端案例传递的真正 message 信息是:current AI systems 当前AI系统缺乏 fundamental understanding 基本理解 of human values,这不是 minor technical issue 小技术问题而是 fundamental flaw 根本缺陷。对文章主旨的作用是通过 concrete illustration 具体例证让读者感受到 programming human values 编程人类价值观的 critical necessity 关键必要性。

  • 现有机器人能力的局限性

    P4
    Some robots are already programmed with basic human values.

    限制性修饰语类 already programmed with basic basic values some robots only if merely programmed simple check just basic

    表面上在说 some robots have basic values 一些机器人有基本价值观,这听起来像 positive development 积极进展,但通过 some(不是 all)和 basic(不是 sophisticated)这两个 limiting words 限制性词汇,作者传递的 real message 真实信息是:现有的 programming 编程还远远不够 far from sufficient,只能处理 simple scenarios 简单场景(如 personal space),对于 complex moral decisions 复杂道德决策还无能为力。这为文章主旨服务的方式是:通过 acknowledge current limitations 承认当前局限来 reinforce 强化 the need for more sophisticated moral programming 更复杂道德编程的需求。

  • 创造复杂道德机器的前提困难

    P5
    It will be possible to create more sophisticated moral machines, if only we can find a way to set out human values as clear rules.

    让步类 if only provided that as long as assuming that given that on condition that only if

    表面说 it's possible 这是可能的,但 if only we can find a way 这个条件从句透露的 implication 言外之意是:我们 currently don't have a way 目前还没有方法,而且 finding this way 找到这个方法本身就是 major challenge 重大挑战。通过 set out human values as clear rules 将人类价值观设定为明确规则,作者暗示这是个 formidable task 艰巨任务,因为 human values are inherently complex and context-dependent 人类价值观本质上复杂且依赖语境。这对主旨的作用是 introduce the core difficulty 引入核心困难,为后续讨论 alternative approaches 替代方法铺路。

  • 机器人危险的真实来源

    P6
    They are dangerous only if programmers are careless.

    条件限制类 only if only when solely because exclusively due to purely a result of merely because simply if

    表面在说机器人 are dangerous 是危险的,但通过 only if programmers are careless 这个条件,作者传递的 real implication 真实含义是:机器人本身并不是 inherent threat 固有威胁,真正的 problem 问题在于 human oversight 人类监督。这句话实际上是在 downplay technological risks 淡化技术风险同时 emphasize human responsibility 强调人类责任。对主旨的贡献是:将讨论焦点从 technology limitations 技术局限转向 human practices 人类实践,暗示通过 better testing and programming 更好的测试和编程可以 eliminate dangers 消除危险。

  • 人类测试不足才是根本问题

    P7
    The biggest concern with robots going against human values is that human beings fail to do sufficient testing and they've produced a system that will break some kind of taboo.

    强调递进类 biggest concern most important primary issue key problem main challenge critical factor central question

    表面说 biggest concern 是机器人 going against human values 违背人类价值观,但紧接着的解释 human beings fail to do sufficient testing 人类未能充分测试,这传递的 deeper message 深层信息是:技术本身不是 root cause 根源,人类的 inadequate processes 不充分流程才是。通过 they've produced a system 他们已经制造出系统,暗示问题 already exists 已经存在而非 hypothetical 假设性的。对主旨的作用是 shift focus 转移焦点:不是讨论 whether to program values 是否编程价值观,而是强调 how to ensure proper implementation 如何确保正确实施,特别是 testing protocols 测试协议。

  • 简单检查机制的实际可行性

    P8
    One simple check would be to program a robot to check the correct course of action with a human when presented with an unusual situation.

    对比淡化类 One simple check simple check straightforward solution basic approach easy way just one step merely requires

    表面说 one simple check 一个简单检查,但结合前文关于 complex moral programming 复杂道德编程的讨论,这个 simple 传递的 implication 言外之意是:不需要 solve all ethical problems in advance 提前解决所有伦理问题,通过 human-in-the-loop 人在回路中这个 pragmatic approach 务实方法就能 mitigate major risks 减轻主要风险。这暗示 perfect programming 完美编程不是 prerequisite 前提条件,good-enough safeguards 足够好的保障措施加上 human oversight 人类监督就能 work effectively 有效运作。对主旨的作用是提供 actionable solution 可行解决方案,从 theoretical impossibility 理论不可能转向 practical feasibility 实践可行性。

  • 人类决策的类比验证

    P9
    If we humans aren't quite sure about a decision, we go and ask somebody else.

    类比推理类 If we humans Just as humans Like people do Similar to how we The way humans Humans also We too

    表面在说人类 ask somebody else 询问他人,但 deeper implication 深层含义是:让机器人 seek human guidance 寻求人类指导不是 admission of AI failure AI失败的承认,而是 intelligent design 智能设计,因为这 mirrors 镜像了 successful human decision-making 成功的人类决策。通过这个 analogy 类比,作者传递的 message 信息是:不确定时 asking for help 寻求帮助是 sign of intelligence 智能的标志而非 weakness 弱点。对主旨的作用是 reframe 重新框架 human oversight 人类监督:不是因为 AI is inadequate AI不够格,而是因为 collaborative decision-making 协作决策本身就是 best practice 最佳实践。

  • 定义道德的根本挑战

    P10
    The most difficult step in programming values will be deciding exactly what we believe is moral, and how to create a set of ethical rules.

    强调递进类 most difficult step hardest part toughest challenge greatest obstacle most daunting task biggest hurdle most complex issue

    表面说 most difficult step 最困难步骤是 deciding what is moral 决定什么是道德,但通过将这个 philosophical question 哲学问题框定为 a step 一个步骤,作者传递的 implication 言外之意是:这虽然是 difficult 困难但不是 impossible 不可能,是 process 过程中的一环而非 insurmountable barrier 不可逾越障碍。后面的 But if we come up with an answer 但如果我们想出答案,这个 conditional optimism 条件乐观进一步暗示 solution is within reach 解决方案触手可及。对主旨的作用是 end on hopeful note 以希望结束:尽管 challenges are real 挑战真实存在,但通过 collaborative human effort 人类协作努力,编程 moral robots 道德机器人是 achievable goal 可实现目标。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Cautiously optimistic about AI with proper ethical programming)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 首段定调法 P1

    议论文的 thesis statement 通常在开头段落就会 reveal 作者的 basic stance。这里用 'can be avoided' 而非 'cannot be solved',说明作者对解决 AI safety 持 positive outlook,这是判断 attitude 的第一个 key signal。

  2. 议论文中,作者如果花大量篇幅 discussing feasible solutions 并用 'possible', 'could', 'would' 这类 modal verbs,说明他们相信 problem is solvable。这种 solution-focused approach 是 supportive attitude 的典型 marker,因为 pessimistic writers 通常会 emphasize obstacles 而非 solutions。

  3. 让步-反驳模式识别 P6 P7

    在 argumentative essays 中,作者如何 address opposing views 或 potential problems 能 reveal 他们的 true attitude。这里作者 doesn't deny risks,但 immediately mitigates them by saying dangers exist 'only if' certain conditions,并 quickly shifts to preventive measures。这说明作者 fundamentally believes the issue is manageable,属于 cautiously supportive 而非 overly worried。

  4. 结论定性法 P10

    Conclusion 在 argumentative writing 中 carries significant weight,因为这是作者 final message to readers。使用 'good for humanity' 这种 unambiguously positive phrase,而且是放在整篇文章的 last sentence,clear indicates 作者希望 readers leave with hopeful impression。如果作者 truly worried 或 negative,conclusion 会用 warning tone 或 express continued concern。

  5. 议论文的 attitude 判断需要 synthesize multiple textual signals。单独的 one or two positive words 不足以 determine overall stance,必须看 structural patterns(how much space devoted to solutions)、logical flow(problem→solution vs. problem→more problems)、以及 tone consistency(是否 throughout 保持 similar attitude)。这篇文章在所有 levels 都 point to same direction,确认了 coherent supportive attitude。

文中的态度信号词

  • can be avoided P1

    这个 modal verb 'can' + passive structure 'be avoided' 在 argumentative context 里 signals 作者认为 problem 不是 inevitable 或 insurmountable。它 establishes 一个 solution-oriented framework,暗示 agency and possibility,这是 optimistic attitude 的 foundational marker。

    同类词 can be solved is achievable is possible can overcome is manageable

  • it's necessary to P2

    这种 necessity expressions 在 argumentative writing 里 indicates 作者 believes in actionability。不是说 'it's impossible' 或 'we can't',而是 'necessary',意味着作者 sees clear path forward 并 advocates for action。这 implies underlying belief that action will yield results,supporting optimistic stance。

    同类词 we need to we should we must it's essential to we ought to

  • will be possible P5

    Future modal 'will' + 'possible' 是 double affirmation,既表示 future certainty(will)又表示 capability(possible)。在 argumentative discourse 中,这种 combination projects confidence in future positive developments。比单独说 'might be possible' 语气更 definite,显示作者 firmly believes in feasibility。

    同类词 can be done is feasible is attainable will be achievable can be accomplished

  • only if P6

    这个 limiting conditional 'only if' 在 discussing dangers 时 acts as qualifier,把 threat scope 限制在 specific condition(programmers' carelessness)。在 argumentation 中,这种 structure minimizes risk 的 inevitability,suggesting 作者认为 with proper care,problems won't occur。这 supports cautiously optimistic attitude by framing dangers as avoidable。

    同类词 only when as long as provided that on condition that so long as

  • could be good P10

    Conclusion 里用 'could be good for humanity' 作为 final statement,用 positive evaluative adjective 'good' 配 beneficiary 'humanity',creates uplifting ending。虽然 'could' 保持了 cautious tone,但 overall evaluation is positive。在 argumentative closing,这种 language choice signals 作者的 ultimate hope and endorsement。

    同类词 might benefit would be positive can be beneficial may help could improve

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开头提出争议性话题 P1

    第1段 开头就提出了 growing concerns about robots becoming a threat,这是一个需要 debate 的 issue。说明文会 describe facts objectively,新闻报道会 report events,而议论文会 present a position on a controversial topic。

  2. 明确表达立场观点 P2 P3

    第2段 出现 'Russell argues that',第3段 出现 'said Russell',这些都是在 express a specific position。说明文会 present multiple views equally,新闻报道会 quote without taking sides,而议论文会 build up arguments to support one view。

  3. 举例支撑论点 P3 P4

    第3段 的 cat in the oven example 和 第4段 的 cultural differences example 都是在 support Russell's argument about programming values。说明文的 examples 是为了 explain how things work,新闻报道的 examples 是 factual cases,而议论文的 examples 是 persuasive tools。

  4. 大量使用情态动词 P5 P6 P8 P10

    第5段 'will be possible', 第6段 'could also learn', 第8段 'would be to program', 第10段 'could be good' 这些 modal constructions 都在 propose solutions and predict outcomes。说明文用 'is', 'does' 来 state facts,新闻报道用 past tense 来 report events,而议论文用 modals 来 argue for future actions。

  5. 问题到解决方案的进程 P7 P8 P9 P10

    第7段 指出 'biggest concern',第8段-9 提出 'one simple check' 和具体的 solution,第10段 总结 'most difficult step' 并展望 positive outcome。这种 structured progression from problem to solution 是 argumentative writing 的典型特征,说明文只是 describe,新闻报道只是 inform,而议论文要 advocate for change。

  6. 这篇文章完整体现了 argumentative essay 的所有核心特征:controversial opening (AI threat), clear authorial stance (Russell's position), persuasive examples (cat in oven), high modal density (will/could/would), 和 problem-solution structure。如果是说明文,它会 neutrally explain how AI works;如果是新闻报道,它会 report specific AI incidents。但这篇文章明确在 argue for a position:we need to program human values into AI。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • argues P2 观点引导词 according to said claims contends believes
  • For example P3 论证逻辑连接词(举例论证) for example for instance such as like to illustrate
  • if P5 论证逻辑连接词(条件推理) unless provided that only if as long as assuming that
  • Obviously P4 立场表态词 obviously clearly undoubtedly certainly of course
  • concerns P1 立场表态词 concern worry worrying threat risk
  • But P10 论证逻辑连接词(转折让步) but however yet although nevertheless
  • would P3 立场表态词(情态动词表建议评价) could should must need to ought to
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

6 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》 的常见问题

2016年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章 Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist 的原文出自哪里?
2015年 10月 31 日刊登在 QUARTZ 网站上的一篇标题为“Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist”(《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》)的文章。
2016年6月英语四级真题第1套文章《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》的主旨是什么?
为防止人工智能机器人威胁人类,我们必须为其编程人类价值观和道德规范。尽管在定义和编码伦理方面存在挑战,机器人可以通过预编程的价值观、数据分析以及面对不确定情况时的人类监督来学习适当的行为。(英文表述:To prevent AI robots from threatening humanity, we must program them with human values and morals. While challenges exist in defining and coding ethics, robots can learn appropriate behavior through pre-programmed values, data analysis, and human oversight when facing uncertain situations.)
Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist(2016年6月英语四级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是积极支持(Cautiously optimistic about AI with proper ethical programming)。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 350 词、10 段;在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 234 篇(占 46%)。
2016年6月英语四级真题第1套文章《一位计算机科学家认为人类价值观应该被编入机器人中》的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 10 段按议论文骨架分为 5 个意群:引言 · 第1段——AI威胁与解决方案的提出;分论点 · 第2段、第3段——道德翻译的必要性论证;分论点 · 第4段、第5段、第6段——现有价值编程的实践与拓展;分论点 · 第7段、第8段、第9段——风险防范的具体措施;结论 · 第10段——挑战承认与积极展望。
Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Cautiously optimistic about AI with proper ethical programming)。判断路径:首段定调法 → 解决方案占比法 → 让步-反驳模式识别 → 结论定性法 → 多维证据整合;文中的态度信号词包括 can be avoided(第1段)、it's necessary to(第2段)、will be possible(第5段)、only if(第6段)、could be good(第10段)。
2016年6月英语四级真题第1套文章 Human Values Should Be Programmed Into Robots,Argues a Computer Scientist 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:sophisticated(复杂精密的;先进的;高级的)、translate(转换;转化;翻译)、preload(预先装载;预装)、taboo(禁忌;忌讳;严禁之事),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: