2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)
CET-4 · 来自 2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 · Part II Section C (2) · 听力

2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)

议论文 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 236 词、4 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语四级文章中占 32%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

4 段英文原文

以下为2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的听力原文,共 4 段。左侧 P1–P4 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Telling stories is one of the most powerful means leaders have to influence, teach and inspire. Storytelling forges connections among people. When it comes to our countries, our communities, and our families, we understand instinctively that the stories we hold in common are an important part of the ties that bind.

This understanding also holds true in the business world, where an organization's stories, and the stories its leaders tell, help solidify relationships in a way that factual statements don't.

Good stories do more than create a sense of connection. They build familiarity and trust. They allow the listener to enter the story, making them more open to learning. Good stories can contain multiple meanings, so they're surprisingly economical in conveying complex ideas in graspable ways. And stories are more engaging than the recital of data points or a discussion of abstract ideas.

Stories about professional mistakes and what leaders learned from them are another great avenue for learning. Because people identify so closely with stories, they can imagine how they would have acted in similar circumstances. They're able to work through situations in a way that's risk-free. There are extra benefits for leaders: with a simple personal story, they can convey fundamental values. They can offer insight into the evolution of their own experience and knowledge, presenting themselves as more approachable and then they are more likely to inspire others to want to know more.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

4 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Universal Power of Storytelling in Leadership

    Storytelling is a fundamental and powerful tool for leaders to create deep human connections across all levels of social relationships.

    这个paragraph在整篇文章中act as the foundation stone。它不仅introduce了storytelling这个central topic,更重要的是establish了一个premise:storytelling creates connections。这个premise是后面所有arguments的basis。从article thesis来看,这段话提供了'powerful leadership tool'这个核心概念的first layer of explanation,为后续段落discuss storytelling在business context和learning context中的specific applications做好了铺垫。它的role是frame the entire discussion,让readers understand为什么storytelling值得深入探讨。

    识别首段定位策略
  2. P2

    Storytelling's Edge in Business Relationships

    In business contexts, organizational stories and leaders' narratives build stronger relationships than factual statements alone.

    这个paragraph serve as a bridge,connecting第一段的universal principle到后面更detailed discussion。从article thesis角度看,它开始address'leadership tool'的practical application in business。虽然这段relatively short,但它完成了crucial task:把storytelling从abstract concept转化为concrete business practice。它validate了storytelling不是just a social phenomenon,而是a professional tool with measurable impact on relationships。这为第三段深入explore storytelling的specific benefits准备了context。

    追踪论证转折过渡
  3. P3

    The Multifaceted Benefits of Storytelling

    Good stories provide multiple benefits: building trust, enabling learning, conveying complex ideas efficiently, and engaging audiences more effectively than data or abstractions.

    这个paragraph是整篇文章的substantive core,它provide了detailed evidence for为什么storytelling是'powerful leadership tool'。从article thesis来看,这段address了'facilitates learning more effectively than facts alone'这个核心claim。四个benefits不是random list,而是carefully structured:从emotional level(trust)到cognitive level(learning),从content efficiency到audience engagement。这个comprehensive list make the argument convincing and actionable。它为第四段introduce specific application(learning from mistakes)提供了theoretical foundation,especially是'open to learning'这个benefit直接connect to下一段的theme。

    梳理并列列举结构
  4. P4

    Learning Through Leaders' Mistake Stories

    Leaders can use stories about mistakes to provide safe learning experiences for others while demonstrating their own growth, values, and approachability, thereby inspiring followers.

    这个paragraph serve as the conclusion and practical synthesis of整篇文章。它take all previous abstract benefits of storytelling并show how they manifest in一个specific, powerful application。从article thesis来看,这段directly address'convey values, demonstrate growth, and inspire others in authentic, relatable ways'。The choice of mistake stories是particularly effective因为它embody vulnerability and authenticity,which是现代leadership theory的core concepts。这个paragraph不只是add one more benefit,而是demonstrate how storytelling integrate multiple leadership functions into one tool。它的role是provide readers with actionable insight:不只是'storytelling is good',而是'here's exactly how you can use it'。这make整篇文章从theoretical discussion变成practical guide。

    区分案例和原理层次
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

4 道逐段细节自检题

针对2023年6月英语四级真题第2套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 shared stories countries, communities, and families

    What role do shared stories play in countries, communities, and families?

    • A They remove disagreements between different social groups.
    • B They provide leaders with factual evidence for public decisions.
    • C They strengthen the bonds among members of a group.
    • D They make family traditions less important to younger people.
    • E They enable communities to avoid learning from the past.
    • F They replace the need for direct communication among people.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项准确概括了 shared stories 与 ties that bind 之间的因果关系:共同故事构成维系群体的纽带。它没有机械照抄 bind,而是用 strengthen the bonds 完成同义改写,符合四级常见的 paraphrase 设计。障碍在于题干列出 countries、communities、families,考生可能误以为要选某种政治或家庭管理功能;实际上这三个对象共同指向 social connection。

    长串对象锁段 时间极紧时,不要从头读全文,也不要先逐个翻译六个选项。直接在题干中把 countries, communities, and families 当作“长串指纹”扫描,立即定位 第1段;然后只读该处包含 hold in common 和 ties that bind 的完整句。采用“谓语力度筛选”:将六项中表示群体关系结果的谓语排成一列,正确项对应的是温和的 strengthen,而含 remove、replace 等全称力度的项快速删除。最后再确认正确项即可。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 organizational stories business world

    Why are organizational stories valuable in the business world?

    • A They make factual reports more accurate and detailed.
    • B They allow organizations to avoid communicating with employees.
    • C They guarantee that business decisions will be accepted by everyone.
    • D They help strengthen relationships more effectively than factual statements do.
    • E They reduce the amount of data that leaders need to collect.
    • F They turn abstract business ideas into legal rules.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项完整保留了原文的比较逻辑:stories help solidify relationships,而 factual statements do not achieve this in the same way。strengthen 对应 solidify,more effectively than factual statements do 则还原了原文的对比。障碍在于原文采用否定式比较,选项采用正向比较;考生若只盯住 factual statements,容易误选关于信息准确性的选项。

    否定比较反转 把 business world 视为单点导航词,快速定位 第2段。随后不必精读所有句子,只执行“否定句反转”:看到 factual statements don't,立即问“stories 能做到的唯一动作是什么”,并在选项中寻找带有 relationships 和比较意义的正确项。其余选项即使出现 factual、business 或 data,只要没有保留“关系+比较”这两个语义槽位,就先删去。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 complex ideas efficiently

    What enables good stories to communicate complex ideas efficiently?

    • A Their factual precision makes listeners trust every conclusion.
    • B They replace the need to discuss abstract ideas at all.
    • C They present more data points than formal reports.
    • D They prevent listeners from interpreting events differently.
    • E Their multiple meanings let them convey difficult ideas in graspable and economical ways.
    • F They ensure that listeners will remember all the details.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项复现完整的逻辑链:multiple meanings 是原因,convey difficult ideas 是功能,graspable and economical ways 是效果。complex 被替换为 difficult,communicate 被替换为 convey,属于忠实的同义改写。障碍在于同段还有 trust、learning 和 engaging 等多个正确信息;但只有该项同时回答了“复杂思想”和“效率”两个限定条件。

    三格因果链 直接用 complex ideas 定位 第3段,并把该句压缩成“三格链条”:原因 multiple meanings → 动作 conveying ideas → 结果 economical and graspable。然后对选项做链条匹配,不需要逐项全文回查。能同时填满三格的正确项保留;只出现 trust、data 或 memory 的选项,属于同段“真信息错答题”,立即排除。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 professional mistake personal story

    How can a leader benefit from sharing a personal story about a professional mistake?

    • A It lets the leader avoid being judged for any future mistakes.
    • B It guarantees that listeners will act exactly as the leader did.
    • C It allows listeners to work through similar situations without real risk.
    • D It proves that the leader has never lacked professional knowledge.
    • E It makes factual statements unnecessary in all workplace communication.
    • F It can communicate core values, make the leader seem more approachable, and encourage others to learn more.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项按原文逻辑顺序整合三层收益:convey fundamental values,present themselves as more approachable,进而 inspire others to want to know more。core values、seem more approachable 和 encourage others to learn more 都是规范同义改写。障碍在于段首也提到听众可 imagine 和 risk-free 地处理情境;那是听众收益,不能替代领导者的形象与影响力收益。

    受益者贴标签 用 professional mistake 直接定位 第4段,但不要从段首顺读到底。看到题干中的 leader benefit 后,立刻在该段内跳扫 leaders、personal story、values、approachable 这一组词,专找对象为 leader 的后半区。然后采用“受益者标注法”:在每个选项旁标 L 或 P,L 表示 leader,P 表示 people/listeners;P 类即使内容真实也删除,剩下与价值传递和形象改善一致的正确项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

4 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    故事叙述的力量与连接作用

    这个 opening paragraph 开门见山地提出了 storytelling 是 leaders 最有力的 means 之一,能够 influence、teach 和 inspire 他人,强调 stories 在不同层面都能 forge connections,create ties that bind。

    作为 introduction,这个意群 establishes the central claim 即 storytelling 的 powerful nature,为后续的 elaboration 奠定 foundation,引出 leadership tool 这个 core concept。

    提出核心工具及其基础功能
  2. 分论点 P2

    商业领域中的故事效用

    这个 supporting point 把 storytelling 的 application 聚焦到 business world,指出 organization's stories 和 leaders' storytelling 能够 solidify relationships,效果超过 factual statements,这是对 introduction 的第一个 concrete development。

    作为第一个 body paragraph,它 narrows the scope 从 general connections 到 business relationships,用 comparison 的方式 (stories vs. factual statements) 来 strengthen the argument,为 storytelling as a leadership tool 提供 contextual evidence。

    明确商业场景中的实际效果
  3. 分论点 P3

    故事的多重深层价值

    这个 supporting point 用 "do more than" 来 expand the argument,列举了 stories 的 multiple benefits:build familiarity and trust、make listeners open to learning、convey complex ideas economically、更 engaging than data,这是对 storytelling effectiveness 的 comprehensive elaboration。

    作为第二个 body paragraph,它 deepens the analysis by providing multiple dimensions of storytelling's power,从 emotional connection (trust) 到 cognitive benefits (learning, conveying complex ideas),再到 engagement,为 "more effective than facts alone" 这个 claim 提供 multi-faceted support。

    详述故事优于数据的多维优势
  4. 分论点 P4

    错误故事的学习价值与领导启示

    这个 supporting point 聚焦 specific type of stories about professional mistakes,说明这类 stories 如何 facilitate learning through identification 和 risk-free practice,还特别强调了对 leaders 的 extra benefits:convey values、show evolution、appear approachable、inspire others,这是 storytelling as leadership tool 的 concrete demonstration。

    作为第三个 body paragraph,它通过 specific example (mistake stories) 来 demonstrate how storytelling works in practice for leaders,simultaneously addressing both the learning aspect 和 leadership authenticity aspect of the thesis,把 abstract claims 转化为 concrete application scenarios。

    展示错误叙事的双重教育功能
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首段首句定位核心概念 P1

    议论文的 opening paragraph 往往采用 direct statement 的方式提出 thesis,首句会用 strong adjectives(如 powerful, essential)或 definitive statements 来 establish 作者的 stance。这种 explicit positioning 让读者能在 5-10 秒内 identify 文章要 argue 的 central point。

  2. 段间核心词追踪延展 P2 P3 P4

    议论文通过 progressive elaboration 来 build argument。每个 body paragraph 会用 transitional phrases(如 also, more than)和 parallel structures 来 connect 回 main thesis,同时 add layers of meaning。这种 cumulative development 帮助读者 track 作者的 reasoning chain 并 confirm 文章的 overarching message。

  3. 效果列举支撑论点 P3 P4

    议论文通过 listing benefits 或 outcomes 来 substantiate 其 central assertion。这种 cumulative evidence 不是 random accumulation,而是 strategic selection 来 demonstrate 从不同 angles 支持 main point。识别这个 pattern 能让考生快速 grasp 作者的 argumentative strategy 和 ultimate message。

  4. 整合论点论据成主旨 P1 P2 P3 P4

    议论文的 main idea 是 thesis statement + key supporting dimensions 的 synthesis。最后一步需要 考生 integrate 各部分的 information into a coherent summary。这个 synthetic understanding 不仅 capture 表面的 topic,更要 reflect 作者的 stance, purpose, 和 argumentative emphasis。对于考试而言,这个 comprehensive grasp 是 answer main idea questions correctly 的关键。

主旨信号词 most powerful P1 forges connections P1 do more than P3 build familiarity and trust P3 more engaging P3 fundamental values P4

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

讲故事是一种强大的领导工具,它能建立联系、培养信任,并比单纯陈述事实更有效地促进学习。领导者可以利用故事,特别是关于错误和经验教训的故事,来传达价值观、展示成长,并以真实、易产生共鸣的方式激励他人。
Storytelling is a powerful leadership tool that creates connections, builds trust, and facilitates learning more effectively than facts alone. Leaders can use stories, especially about mistakes and lessons learned, to convey values, demonstrate growth, and inspire others in authentic, relatable ways.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • forge 建立、形成

    让我们把三条线索串起来看。第一条告诉我们 forge 是 storytelling 作为 powerful means 的核心动作,目标是 connections,而这些 connections 是 ties that bind。第二条通过 solidify relationships 这个同义表达,确认了 forge 的建立、巩固含义。第三条直接用 create a sense of connection 来解释 stories 的作用,这就是 forge 的同义替换。所以 forge connections 就是创建、建立连接的意思。

    通过结果反推动作含义
  • solidify 使稳固、使巩固

    三条线索形成了完整的 reasoning chain。构词法告诉我们 solidify 的基本含义是使变得 solid。上下文对比告诉我们 stories 有 factual statements 没有的效果,结合前文的 forge connections 和 ties that bind,这个效果就是让关系更牢固。第3段 的 build trust 进一步确认了这种 strengthening effect。所以 solidify relationships 就是使关系变得坚固、稳固。

    构词法与语境验证结合
  • graspable 可理解的、易于掌握的

    构词法给出了 graspable 的字面意思:能够被 grasp 的,也就是能被理解的。第一条线索通过 complex ideas 和 economical 的搭配,确认了 graspable 是让复杂事物变得容易理解的状态。第二条线索通过 abstract ideas 的对比,进一步明确 graspable 是与 abstract 相对的,是具体可感的、易于把握的。所以 graspable ways 就是易于理解的方式。

    形容词通过修饰对象推义
  • recital 列举、陈述

    构词法告诉我们 recital 源自 recite,是背诵、朗诵的名词形式。并列结构显示 recital 和 discussion 是同类的 presentation methods。对比关系确认了 recital 是 less engaging 的方式,和 stories 的生动形成反差。结合 data points 这个 object,recital of data points 就是机械地列举数据点,是一种枯燥的陈述方式。

    通过并列与搭配推测行为
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

4 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 排比修辞

    P3

    在 第3段 中,作者连续使用了五个 parallel structures 来阐述 good stories 的 multiple benefits:create connection、build familiarity and trust、allow listener to enter、contain multiple meanings、more engaging than data。这种 repetitive pattern 通过 rhythmic arrangement 强化了 storytelling 的 powerful impact,让 reader 在 cumulative effect 中深刻感受到 stories 作为 leadership tool 的 irreplaceable value。每个分句都以相似的 grammatical structure 开头,形成了强大的 persuasive force,directly supports 文章关于 storytelling effectiveness 的 central argument。

    仿写: 当你需要 elaborate multiple advantages 或 enumerate several aspects 时,可以采用 parallel structure。建议先 identify your main point,然后 list out 3-5 个 supporting details,确保每个 clause 都以 similar grammatical pattern 开头。模版:'Good X does more than [action A]. It [verb B]. It [verb C]. It [verb D]. And it [verb E].' 或者 'They [verb + object], they [verb + object], and they [verb + object].' 注意 maintain consistent tense 和 sentence structure,最后一个分句可以用 'And' 来 create climax。

  • 对比论证

    P2 P3

    在 第2段 和 第3段 中,作者使用了 implicit contrast 来突出 stories 的 superiority。第2段 提到 stories 'help solidify relationships in a way that factual statements don't',第3段 强调 stories 'are more engaging than the recital of data points or a discussion of abstract ideas'。这种 comparison strategy 通过 juxtaposing storytelling with factual/data-driven approaches,clearly demonstrates storytelling 的 unique advantages。这个 contrast 直接 reinforces 文章的 central thesis,即 storytelling 比 traditional information delivery methods 更 effective in leadership context。

    信号词 in a way that...don't more...than rather than unlike whereas in contrast to compared to instead of while

    仿写: 使用对比论证时,要 identify two contrasting approaches or concepts relevant to your topic。建议采用 'A does X in a way that B doesn't' 或 'A is more [adjective] than B' 的 sentence pattern。模版:'X helps achieve [goal] in a way that Y doesn't' 或 'X are more [positive quality] than Y'。记住要 clearly state both sides,但 emphasize 你 support 的那一方的 advantages。可以在 different paragraphs 分别 elaborate,也可以在 same sentence 中 directly contrast。

  • 因果论证

    P4

    第4段 中展现了清晰的 causal chain:leaders tell stories about mistakes → people identify with stories → they imagine similar circumstances → they work through situations risk-free → leaders convey values and appear approachable → inspire others。这个 logical progression 通过 cause-and-effect relationship 解释了 why storytelling about mistakes is effective。这种 reasoning pattern 让 argument 显得 logical and convincing,直接 supports 文章关于 storytelling 作为 powerful learning tool 的 main point。通过 showing the mechanism of how stories work,author 让 reader understand the underlying logic。

    信号词 because so therefore thus as a result consequently hence this leads to this allows this enables since due to

    仿写: 构建因果论证时,要 identify clear cause-effect relationships。建议使用 'because', 'so', 'therefore', 'as a result' 等 causal connectors。可以采用 chain reasoning,即 A leads to B, B leads to C。模版:'Because [reason], [result]' 或 'When [action], [consequence]' 或者建立 multi-step chain:'[Event A]. This [verb] [Event B]. As a result, [Event C].' 确保每个 causal link 是 logical and clear,avoid jumping to conclusions without proper connection。

  • 比喻修辞

    P1

    第1段 中 'ties that bind' 是一个 powerful metaphor,将 abstract concept of social connections 比作 physical ties or ropes。这个 figurative language 让 intangible concept 变得 concrete and visualizable,帮助 reader 更直观地 understand how stories create connections。同样,'Storytelling forges connections' 中的 'forge' 是 metallurgical metaphor,暗示 stories 像 forging metal 一样 create strong, lasting bonds。这些 metaphors 不仅 make abstract ideas more accessible,还 add emotional depth 到 argument 中,supporting 文章关于 storytelling power 的 central theme。

    仿写: 使用比喻时,要 find concrete objects or actions that share characteristics with your abstract concept。建议选择 familiar, tangible things 作为 vehicle of metaphor。可以使用 verbs with metaphorical meanings(如 'forge', 'weave', 'bridge')或 noun phrases(如 'ties that bind')。模版:'[Abstract concept] is/are [concrete object/action]' 或直接用 metaphorical verb:'[Subject] forges/weaves/builds [object]'。确保 metaphor 是 appropriate and clear,不要 overuse 或 mix incompatible metaphors。Good metaphors should feel natural 而不是 forced。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

3 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 事实陈述的局限性暗示

    P2
    help solidify relationships in a way that factual statements don't

    否定对比类 don't can't won't not never fail to lack

    这个 implication 是:factual statements 在 building business relationships 方面 are insufficient or ineffective。作者通过 negating facts 的 ability,implicitly conveys 一个 critical insight——单纯的 data and facts 缺乏 emotional resonance 和 human connection。这个 implied meaning 对 main thesis 起到 foundational support 的作用,它 establishes 为什么 storytelling 是 necessary 而不仅仅是 optional。By pointing out facts 的 limitation,作者 justifies storytelling 作为 a superior alternative 在 leadership context 中的 essential value。

  • 叙述经济性的多重价值暗示

    P3
    they're surprisingly economical in conveying complex ideas in graspable ways

    情态副词类 surprisingly remarkably ironically unfortunately interestingly notably unexpectedly

    这个 implication 揭示:一般 perception 认为 stories 是 verbose or time-consuming,而 complex ideas 需要 lengthy explanations。但作者用 'surprisingly' signal 这个 conventional wisdom is wrong——stories 实际上 are efficient vehicles for complex communication。这个 implied meaning reinforces main thesis 的一个 crucial dimension:storytelling 不仅 effective,而且 efficient,它 can pack multiple layers of meaning into compact narratives。这 addresses 一个 potential objection from busy leaders who might think stories 是 time-wasters,从而 makes the argument more persuasive and comprehensive。

  • 个人脆弱性展示的反直觉效果

    P4
    presenting themselves as more approachable and then they are more likely to inspire others

    比较级暗示类 more approachable more effective easier better stronger clearer more authentic

    这个 implication 传达:leaders 通常 are perceived as distant or unapproachable,这 creates barriers to inspiring followers。通过 sharing personal stories about mistakes,leaders 变得 'more approachable',这 implies 不分享 vulnerability 的 traditional leadership style makes leaders seem remote and less inspiring。这个 implied critique 对 thesis 的 value 在于 it addresses leadership effectiveness 的一个 fundamental challenge——如何 bridge the gap between leaders and followers。作者 subtly suggests storytelling,尤其是 about failures,是 humanizing leadership 的 powerful tool,这 expands the argument beyond information transmission 到 relationship transformation 的 deeper level。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Strongly advocates storytelling as an essential leadership tool)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 首段评价词定调 P1

    议论文的首段通常会亮出作者的core argument,如果开篇就用'powerful'这种正面评价词来定义storytelling的功能,说明作者对该话题持肯定态度,而不是中立的objective描述。

  2. 对比句强化立场 P2 P3

    议论文常用对比论证来强化作者的立场,当作者把自己support的对象和另一个对象对比,并给出优劣judgment时,态度倾向会更加明确,而不是停留在neutral陈述。

  3. 结尾无转折延续态度 P4

    议论文结尾段往往承担收束功能,如果作者在结尾继续用正面词汇罗列好处而不是提出reservation或concern,说明整篇文章态度保持一致的supportive,没有出现转折turn。

  4. 三步印证锁定态度 P1 P2 P3 P4

    三步分析互相印证,全文没有出现matter-of-fact的中立描述,也没有criticism或concern,所以排除客观中立和消极批判两种可能,最终锁定为积极支持。

文中的态度信号词

  • powerful P1

    'powerful'这个词直接给storytelling贴上正面标签,说明作者认为它是leader手中不可或缺的means,而不是众多可选方法之一。

    同类词 forges inspire important

  • solidify P2

    'solidify relationships'用一个dynamic动词表达storytelling带来的稳固effect,暗示作者认为它比factual statements更有效,从而流露出赞赏的态度。

    同类词 connections bind trust

  • more engaging than P3

    这个comparative structure把storytelling和data points直接比较,'more engaging'这种superiority表达清楚地站在storytelling一边,是典型的evaluative对比。

    同类词 more than more open economical

  • great avenue P4

    'great avenue for learning'用great这种strong positive adjective总结mistake故事的value,加上后面risk-free、inspire等词,层层加码强化了作者对storytelling领导力价值的认可。

    同类词 extra benefits risk-free more likely to inspire

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 首句带评价性观点 P1

    本文的 opening sentence 就直接 state 了一个 judgment:'Telling stories is one of the most powerful means'。这个 'most powerful' 是一个 evaluative language,体现了 author's stance。说明文会 neutrally explain storytelling 的 definition 和 features,新闻报道会 report 某个 specific storytelling event,而议论文会直接 argue storytelling 的 value 和 importance。

  2. 段落间递进论证 P2 P3 P4

    第2段 用 'This understanding also holds true' 进行 logical extension,第3段 用 'Good stories do more than' 进行 progressive reasoning,第4段 用 'another great avenue' 继续 add supporting points。这种 layered argumentation 是议论文的典型 structure。说明文会 categorize different aspects independently,新闻会 present information chronologically 或 by importance,而议论文会 build up arguments progressively。

  3. 大量益处性描述 P1 P2 P3 P4

    文中反复使用 benefit-oriented language:'powerful means', 'solidify relationships', 'build familiarity and trust', 'more engaging', 'inspire others'。这些都是在 persuade readers 接受 'storytelling is valuable' 这个 argument。说明文会 objectively describe storytelling 的 characteristics 而不 emphasize benefits,新闻会 report facts 而不 advocate for storytelling。议论文的 persuasive intent 非常明显。

  4. 三要素综合验证 P1 P2 P3 P4

    综合三步形成 判断闭环。单独任何一个 feature 都可能 mislead,但三者结合就能 accurately distinguish genres。比如新闻也可能在 opening 有 viewpoint quote,但缺乏 systematic reasoning;说明文可能有 logical structure,但缺乏 evaluative stance 和 persuasive intent。只有议论文会 simultaneously present 这三个 defining characteristics,形成完整的 argumentation framework。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • This understanding also holds true P2 论证逻辑连接词(类比递进型) also holds true likewise similarly in the same way just as
  • so P3 论证逻辑连接词(因果结果型) therefore thus as a result hence consequently
  • Because P4 论证逻辑连接词(因果原因型) because since for due to owing to
  • more engaging than P3 观点评价词(比较级评价型) powerful surprisingly economical more approachable more likely to inspire good stories
  • There are extra benefits for leaders P4 论证逻辑连接词(增补论证型/分论点标记词) There are extra benefits Moreover In addition What's more Furthermore
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

11 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的常见问题

2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
讲故事是一种强大的领导工具,它能建立联系、培养信任,并比单纯陈述事实更有效地促进学习。领导者可以利用故事,特别是关于错误和经验教训的故事,来传达价值观、展示成长,并以真实、易产生共鸣的方式激励他人。(英文表述:Storytelling is a powerful leadership tool that creates connections, builds trust, and facilitates learning more effectively than facts alone. Leaders can use stories, especially about mistakes and lessons learned, to convey values, demonstrate growth, and inspire others in authentic, relatable ways.)
2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是积极支持(Strongly advocates storytelling as an essential leadership tool)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 236 词、4 段;在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 163 篇(占 32%)。
2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 4 段按议论文骨架分为 4 个意群:引言 · 第1段——故事叙述的力量与连接作用;分论点 · 第2段——商业领域中的故事效用;分论点 · 第3段——故事的多重深层价值;分论点 · 第4段——错误故事的学习价值与领导启示。
2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Strongly advocates storytelling as an essential leadership tool)。判断路径:首段评价词定调 → 对比句强化立场 → 结尾无转折延续态度 → 三步印证锁定态度;文中的态度信号词包括 powerful(第1段)、solidify(第2段)、more engaging than(第3段)、great avenue(第4段)。
2023年6月英语四级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:forge(建立、形成)、solidify(使稳固、使巩固)、graspable(可理解的、易于掌握的)、recital(列举、陈述),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: