2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1)
CET-6 · 来自 2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section A (1) · 听力

2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 321 词、12 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语六级文章中占 39%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

12 段英文原文

以下为2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 12 段。左侧 P1–P12 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

W: Welcome to Work Place, and in today's program we are looking at the results of two recently published surveys, which both deal with the same topic—happiness at work. John, tell us about the first survey.

M: Well, this was done by a human resources consultancy who interviewed more than 1,000 workers and established a top 10 of the factors which make people happy at work. The most important factor, for the majority of the people interviewed, was having friendly, supportive colleagues. In fact, 73% people interviewed put their relationship with colleagues as the key factor contributing to happiness at work, which is a very high percentage. The second most important factor was having work that is enjoyable. The two least important factors were having one's achievements recognized and rather surprisingly, earning a competitive salary.

W: So, we are not mainly motivated by money?

M: Apparently not.

W: Any other interesting information in the survey?

M: Yes. For example, 25% of the working people interviewed described themselves as very happy at work. However, 20% of employees described themselves as being unhappy.

W: That's quite a lot of unhappy people at work every day.

M: It is, isn't it? And there were several more interesting conclusions revealed by the survey. First of all, small is beautiful. People definitely prefer working for smaller organizations or companies with less than 100 staff. We also find out that, generally speaking, women were happier in their work than men.

W: Yes, we are, aren't we?

M: And workers on part-time contracts who only work 4 or 5 hours a day are happier than those who work full time. The researchers concluded that this is probably due to a better work-life balance.

W: Are bosses happier than their employees?

M: Yes. Perhaps not surprisingly, the higher people go in a company, the happier they are. So senior managers enjoy their jobs more than people working under them.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

7 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 节目开场与话题引入

    主持人 host 在 opening 时明确了 program 的 topic,即两项关于 workplace happiness 的 surveys,并通过 invitation 的方式让 guest John 来 introduce 第一项 survey,这是典型的 dialogue opening structure

    作为 dialogue 的 opening,这个 意群 establish 了整个 conversation 的 framework,通过 host 的 introduction 让 audience 明确接下来要 discuss 的 content 是 workplace happiness surveys,为后续的 detailed analysis 搭建了 context

    引出调查主题
  2. 第一项调查的核心发现

    John 作为 respondent 详细 present 了第一项 survey 的 key findings,重点 highlight 了 top factor 是 friendly colleagues(73%),其次是 enjoyable work,而 salary 和 recognition surprisingly 排在 bottom,这个 response 直接 address 了 host 的 question

    这个意群是 dialogue 中的 first major information block,通过 specific data(73% 等 percentages)和 ranking 来 illustrate 什么 factors 真正 contribute to workplace happiness,为主旨中的 'supportive colleagues and enjoyable work matter most' 提供了 concrete evidence

    呈现调查数据
  3. 金钱动机的质疑与确认

    Host 通过 'So we are not mainly motivated by money?' 这个 clarification question 来 highlight 前面 survey 的 surprising finding,而 John 用简短的 'Apparently not' 来 confirm,这是典型的 question-answer pair 在 dialogue 中的 quick exchange

    这个 brief exchange 通过 emphasis 的方式 reinforce 了主旨中 salary 不是 primary motivator 这个 key point,host 的 rhetorical question 让这个 counterintuitive finding 更加 memorable for audience

    强调反直觉发现
  4. 调查中的其他发现引入

    Host 通过 'Any other interesting information' 这个 open-ended question 来 prompt 更多 details,而 John 用 'Yes' 和 'For example' 来 signal 接下来会 provide additional findings,这是 dialogue 中 transition to new sub-topic 的 standard pattern

    这个 transitional 意群 serve 了 bridge function,从前面的 top factors discussion 转向更 detailed statistics,为后续 present 'happiness percentages' 和其他 correlations 做好 preparation

    开启补充信息
  5. 幸福与不幸福员工比例的讨论

    Host 对 John 刚提到的 20% unhappy employees 这个 statistic 做出 comment:'That's quite a lot',John 用 'It is, isn't it?' 来 agree,这是 dialogue 中典型的 comment-agreement exchange,用来 emphasize certain point before moving forward

    这个 brief exchange 通过 emotional reaction 来 highlight 了 workplace unhappiness 的 significant presence,虽然主旨 focus on positive factors,但这个 意群 acknowledge 了 problem 的 existence,使 discussion 更 balanced

    强调负面数据
  6. 调查的多项延伸结论

    John 系统地 present 了 survey 的 additional conclusions,包括 smaller organizations 更受欢迎、women 比 men 更 happy、part-time workers 因为 work-life balance 更 satisfied,这是一个 multi-point enumeration 的 information block

    这个意群 extend 了主旨中关于 happiness correlations 的内容,提供了 organization size、gender、work arrangement 等 additional dimensions,enriching 了对 workplace satisfaction 的 understanding

    列举影响因素
  7. 职位层级与幸福度关系探讨

    Host 提出新的 specific question 关于 bosses 和 employees 的 happiness comparison,John 用 'Yes' 确认并 explain 说 senior managers 比 subordinates 更 enjoy their jobs,这是对前面 findings 的 final supplementary point

    这个 closing 意群 add 了主旨中 'senior positions correlate with higher satisfaction' 这个 dimension,complete 了 survey findings 的 presentation,为整个 discussion 提供了 final piece of puzzle

    补充职级因素
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 识别对话开场的话题宣告 P1

    对话类文章的 opening 往往包含 explicit topic announcement,它会直接 tell you what the conversation is about。这种 meta-discourse markers 比如 'today's program'、'we are looking at' 等,都是在 signaling the main subject。通过 catching these cues,你可以在几秒钟内 grasp the general direction。

  2. 扫描信息组织的结构标记 P2 P6 P8 P10 P12

    Dialogue articles 特别是 survey discussions 会有明显的 organizational cues 来 structure the information。这些 discourse markers 不仅 help you follow the flow,更重要的是它们 reveal what aspects are being covered。当你看到 multiple factors being listed、comparisons being made、或 various findings being enumerated,你就知道 main idea 是关于 exploring multiple dimensions of a topic。

  3. 识别高频主题词汇 P1 P2 P6 P8 P10 P12

    Repetition is a powerful indicator of main idea。当某些 words 或 word families 在 dialogue 中 repeatedly appear across different speakers and contexts,它们就是 central to the topic。特别是在 Q&A format 中,interviewer 和 interviewee 都会 circle back to these core concepts,这种 lexical cohesion 直接 point to what the conversation is fundamentally about。

  4. 综合发现与结论陈述 P2 P8 P10 P12

    在 survey discussion dialogues 中,main idea 不是单一 statement,而是 a synthesis of multiple findings。通过 tracking how various pieces of data are interpreted and connected,你能 understand that the purpose is comprehensive analysis rather than single-point argument。Conclusive markers 和 generalization language 就是在 signaling 'here's what all this data means together'。

主旨信号词 happiness at work P1 survey P1 factors P1 most important P2 revealed P8 contributing to P2

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

一档职场节目讨论关于员工幸福感因素的调查结果,揭示了友好的同事和有趣的工作最为重要,而小型公司、兼职工作安排和高级职位与更高的职场满意度相关。
A workplace program discussion analyzing survey results about employee happiness factors, revealing that supportive colleagues and enjoyable work matter most, while smaller companies, part-time arrangements, and senior positions correlate with higher workplace satisfaction.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • consultancy 咨询公司;咨询机构

    现在让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,从 grammatical function 看,consultancy 是 survey 的执行者;其次,从 word formation 看,它由 consult 加名词后缀构成,指提供咨询服务的机构;最后,从 context 看,它执行的是 professional survey 和 interview。三条线索共同指向同一个结论:consultancy 是咨询公司或咨询机构。

    语法角色+构词拆解+功能语境
  • competitive 有竞争力的;能与他人竞争的

    让我们整合这些 clues。从 syntactic structure 看,competitive 是修饰 salary 的 adjective;从 morphology 看,它来自 compete,表示竞争相关的属性;从 workplace context 看,它指的是薪水在 job market 中的对比优势。三条线索汇聚到一点:competitive salary 指的是在市场上有竞争力的、能吸引人才的薪水水平。

    句法关系+词根意义+搭配领域
  • reveal 揭示;展现;显露

    现在综合三条 clues。从 logical relationship 看,survey 对 conclusions 执行了 reveal 这个动作;从 discourse cohesion 看,reveal 回应了询问更多信息的问题,表示信息的展现;从 functional inference 看,后续列举的具体发现都是 reveal 的结果。三个角度都指向同一个意思:reveal 就是揭示、展现、使…显露。

    主宾关系+话语功能+结果反推
  • balance 平衡;均衡

    整合这些 clues。从 compound structure 看,balance 描述 work 和 life 两者的关系;从 causal reasoning 看,part-time 导致更 better balance,说明它涉及时间精力分配;从 semantic extension 看,balance 从物理均衡延伸到抽象的生活平衡。三条线索共同确认:work-life balance 指工作与生活之间的平衡状态,即时间、精力在两者间的合理分配。

    复合拆解+因果情境+语义类比
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 反问

    P3

    在 第3段 中,女主持人用 'So, we are not mainly motivated by money?' 这个 rhetorical question 来 emphasize 调查结果的 surprising nature。这个反问并不是真的在 seeking an answer,而是通过 questioning tone 来 highlight 一个 counter-intuitive finding:钱并不是 workplace happiness 的 primary driver。这种修辞让 listeners 主动 reflect on 这个 unexpected conclusion,加深对 survey results 的 impression。

    信号词 So Then Does that mean Are you saying Do you mean

    仿写: 当你想 emphasize 一个 surprising finding 或 counter-intuitive point 时,可以用反问来 engage your audience。比如讨论 health topics 时,可以说 'So, exercise alone is not the key to weight loss?'。Template: 'So, [subject] + [negative form of verb] + [expected outcome]?' 这样的 pattern 能有效 challenge common assumptions 并 provoke thought。

  • 反问

    P9

    在 第9段 中,女主持人说 'Yes, we are, aren't we?',这个 tag question 形式的反问用来 reinforce 刚才提到的 women 比 men 在 workplace 更 happy 这个 finding。通过 'aren't we' 这个 tag,她既 express 了 agreement,又用 playful tone 来 emphasize 这个 gender difference,让 discussion 显得更 light-hearted 和 relatable,同时 strengthen 了这个 survey conclusion 的 credibility。

    信号词 aren't we isn't it don't they doesn't it won't they haven't we

    仿写: 当你想 express agreement 并同时 emphasize a point in a friendly way 时,可以使用 tag question。比如 'The weather is beautiful today, isn't it?' 或在 professional context 说 'This approach seems more efficient, doesn't it?'。Pattern: [Affirmative statement] + [negative tag] 或 [Negative statement] + [positive tag]。这种 structure 能让你的 assertion 显得更 inclusive 和 conversational。

  • 反问

    P7 P8

    在 第7段 中,女主持人用 'That's quite a lot of unhappy people at work every day.' 这个 statement 来 emphasize 20% unhappy employees 这个 statistic 的 significance。虽然表面是 declarative sentence,但它实际上起到了 rhetorical emphasis 的作用,implicitly questioning 这种 workplace unhappiness 的 acceptability。接着男主持人在 第8段 用 'It is, isn't it?' 来 reinforce 这个 concern,形成 echo effect,让 listeners 更 aware of 这个 workplace issue 的 seriousness。

    信号词 isn't it aren't they doesn't it don't you think wouldn't you say

    仿写: 当你想 draw attention to 一个 concerning statistic 或 negative finding 时,可以先用 'That's quite a lot of...' 或 'That's rather significant...' 来 frame it,然后用 confirmatory tag question 来 reinforce。例如:'That's a considerable number of students struggling with this topic, isn't it?'。这个 two-part structure 能让你的 concern 显得 measured 但 emphatic,适合 professional discussions 中 highlight issues without being alarmist。

  • 省略

    P4

    在 第4段 中,男嘉宾只回答 'Apparently not.' 这个 elliptical response,省略了 complete sentence structure。完整表达应该是 'Apparently we are not mainly motivated by money.',但通过 ellipsis,他给出了 concise 和 conversational 的回答。这种省略让 dialogue 显得更 natural 和 efficient,避免了 unnecessary repetition,同时 maintain 了 conversation flow 的 smoothness。

    信号词 Apparently Probably Certainly Definitely Obviously Clearly

    仿写: 在 dialogue writing 中,当 answering yes/no questions 或 responding to statements 时,可以 use elliptical responses 来 sound more natural。比如问 'Are you going to the meeting?' 可以回答 'Probably not.' 而非 'I am probably not going to the meeting.'。Pattern: [Adverb] + [Yes/No/Not] 是最 common form。这让你的 dialogue 更 authentic,但要确保 context 足够 clear 让 reader 能 recover omitted information。

  • 重复

    P5 P6 P8

    在 第6段 和 第8段 中,男嘉宾 repeatedly use 'interesting' 这个词来 describe survey findings('Any other interesting information' 和 'several more interesting conclusions')。这个 lexical repetition 不是 accidental,而是用来 create cohesion 并 emphasize 这些 survey results 的 noteworthy nature。通过 repeat 这个 positive evaluative term,speaker 持续 signal 给 listeners 这些 findings 值得 attention,maintain 了整个 discussion 的 engaging tone。

    信号词 interesting important significant notable remarkable striking

    仿写: 在 presenting research findings 或 analysis 时,可以 strategically repeat 一个 key evaluative adjective 来 frame your content。比如在 presenting data,可以 repeatedly use 'significant' 或 'notable' 来 categorize findings:'This is a significant trend...' 然后 'Another significant observation...'。这个 technique 能 create a sense of structure 和 coherence。但要 avoid overuse,一般 2-3 次 repetition 最 effective,更多会 sound redundant。

  • 语气词

    P2

    在 第2段 中,男嘉宾用 'rather surprisingly' 来 modify 'earning a competitive salary' 作为 least important factor 这个 finding。这个 evaluative adverbial phrase 表达了 speaker's attitude,signal 给 listeners 这个 result 与 common expectations 不同。它让 dry survey data 变得更 engaging,help listeners understand 应该用 what perspective 来 interpret this information,并且 create 一种 shared surprise 的感觉 between speaker and audience。

    信号词 surprisingly interestingly remarkably unexpectedly notably curiously strikingly

    仿写: 在 presenting data 或 findings 时,strategically use evaluative adverbials 来 highlight unexpected results。Common patterns: 'surprisingly/interestingly/remarkably/unexpectedly' + main clause。例如:'Interestingly, younger participants showed less tech proficiency.' 或 'Surprisingly, the control group performed better.'。这个 technique 让你的 presentation 更 analytical 而非 merely descriptive,show 你能 interpret 而非 just report information。但 use sparingly,too many evaluative markers 会 weaken their impact。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

5 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 工资排名垫底的意外性

    P2
    and rather surprisingly, earning a competitive salary

    情态副词类 rather surprisingly surprisingly unexpectedly ironically interestingly strangely oddly

    John 用 rather surprisingly 来 modify "earning a competitive salary" 排在最后这个 finding,其 implication 是:大众通常 assume money 是 workplace happiness 的 primary motivator,但 survey data 却显示它 ranks lowest。这个 言外之意 directly supports 文章主旨中 "supportive colleagues and enjoyable work matter most" 的 argument,通过 challenge the stereotype about money's importance 来 reinforce the finding that interpersonal factors 才是 true drivers of happiness。这种 surprising contrast 让 audience 重新 evaluate 他们对 workplace motivation 的 assumptions

  • 金钱动机的质疑

    P3
    So, we are not mainly motivated by money?

    推论连接词类 So so then therefore thus hence consequently

    女主持人的这个 question 表面是在 seek confirmation,但实际 function 是 explicitly articulate 前面 survey data 的 radical implication:money 不是 primary motivator。通过用 question form 来 present 这个 counterintuitive conclusion,她在 invite the audience 去 confront 这个与 common belief 相悖的 finding。这直接 reinforces 文章主旨中 "supportive colleagues and enjoyable work matter most" 的 core argument,通过 negative framing ("not mainly motivated by money") 来 create a contrast that makes the real factors stand out

  • 不快乐员工比例的严重性

    P7
    That's quite a lot of unhappy people at work every day

    程度强化词类 quite a lot quite rather pretty fairly considerably significantly

    女主持人用 "quite a lot" 来 evaluate "20% unhappy" 这个 statistic,并通过 concrete image "unhappy people at work every day" 来 emphasize 这个问题的 everyday reality 和 human cost。她的 implication 是:虽然 survey 主要 focus on happiness factors,但这个 significant unhappy proportion 不容 ignore。这个 comment serves to balance 文章主旨,提醒 audience 即使 identify 了 happiness factors,仍有 substantial portion of workers 没有 experience workplace happiness,从而 underscore the importance of implementing 这些 findings

  • 女性职场幸福感的优越性

    P9
    Yes, we are, aren't we?

    附加疑问句类 aren't we isn't it don't we can't we won't they hasn't it didn't they

    女主持人用 "Yes, we are, aren't we?" 来 respond to "women were happier in their work than men" 这个 finding,她的 implication 不仅是 agree with the data,更是通过 first-person plural "we" 来 claim membership in 这个 happier group,并用 tag question 来 invite female audience 的 shared identification。这种 self-congratulatory tone 虽然 lighthearted,但 reinforces 文章主旨中关于 workplace happiness 的 gender dimension,并 humanize 了 statistical findings by connecting them to personal experience

  • 高管幸福感的预料之中

    P12
    Yes. Perhaps not surprisingly, the higher people go in a company, the happier they are

    让步类模糊限制语 Perhaps not surprisingly perhaps not surprisingly maybe unsurprisingly not unexpectedly predictably as expected as one might expect

    John 用 "perhaps not surprisingly" 来 introduce "senior managers enjoy their jobs more" 这个 finding,他的 implication 是:这个 result aligns with common understanding about organizational hierarchy—更高的 position 通常意味着更多 autonomy、control 和 rewards。但 "perhaps" 的使用显示他 slightly hedge,可能因为这个 finding 与 earlier emphasis on "supportive colleagues" (而非 hierarchical position) 产生了 subtle tension。这个 somewhat expected conclusion serves to complete 文章主旨中关于 workplace satisfaction 的 multiple dimensions,包括 position level 这个 structural factor

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

4 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 的常见问题

2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的主旨是什么?
一档职场节目讨论关于员工幸福感因素的调查结果,揭示了友好的同事和有趣的工作最为重要,而小型公司、兼职工作安排和高级职位与更高的职场满意度相关。(英文表述:A workplace program discussion analyzing survey results about employee happiness factors, revealing that supportive colleagues and enjoyable work matter most, while smaller companies, part-time arrangements, and senior positions correlate with higher workplace satisfaction.)
2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 321 词、12 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 233 篇(占 39%)。
2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 12 段按对话骨架分为 7 个意群:第1段——节目开场与话题引入;第2段——第一项调查的核心发现;第3段、第4段——金钱动机的质疑与确认;第5段、第6段——调查中的其他发现引入;第7段、第8段——幸福与不幸福员工比例的讨论;第8段、第9段、第10段——调查的多项延伸结论;第11段、第12段——职位层级与幸福度关系探讨。
2017年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (1) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:consultancy(咨询公司;咨询机构)、competitive(有竞争力的;能与他人竞争的)、reveal(揭示;展现;显露)、balance(平衡;均衡),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: