2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training
CET-6 · 来自 2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 · Part III Section C (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training

2018年12月英语六级真题第1套文章逐层精读

美国国立生物技术信息中心网站www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov一篇题为 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training(科学向大众的传播:为何我们需要将该技能纳入正规的科学培训,对本科生以及研究生进行传授)的文章。

本页是 2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 422 词、6 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

6 段英文原文

以下为2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 6 段。左侧 P1–P6 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training

The public must be able to understand the basics of science to make informed decisions. Perhaps the most dramatic example of the negative consequences of poor communication between scientists and the public is the issue of climate change, where a variety of factors, not the least of which is a breakdown in the transmission of fundamental climate data to the general public, has contributed to widespread mistrust and misunderstanding of scientists and their research.

The issue of climate change also illustrates how the public acceptance and understanding of science (or the lack of it) can influence governmental decision-making with regard to regulation, science policy and research funding.

However, the importance of effective communication with a general audience is not limited to hot issues like climate change. It is also critical for socially charged neuroscience issues such as the genetic basis for a particular behavior, the therapeutic potential of stem cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases, or the use of animal models, areas where the public understanding of science can also influence policy and funding decisions. Furthermore, with continuing advances in individual genome(基因组) sequencing and the advent of personalized medicine, more non-scientists will need to be comfortable analyzing complex scientific information to make decisions that directly affect their quality of life.

Science journalism is the main channel for the popularization of scientific information among the public. Much has been written about how the relationship between scientists and the media can shape the efficient transmission of scientific advances to the public. Good science journalists are specialists in making complex topics accessible to a general audience, while adhering to scientific accuracy.

Unfortunately, pieces of science journalism can also oversimplify and generalize their subject material to the point that the basic information conveyed is obscured or at worst, obviously wrong. The impact of a basic discovery on human health can be exaggerated so that the public thinks a miraculous cure is a few months to years away when in reality the significance of the study is far more limited.

Even though scientists play a part in transmitting information to journalists and ultimately the public, too often the blame for ineffective communication is placed on the side of the journalists. We believe that at least part of the problem lies in places other than the interaction between scientists and members of the media, and exists because for one thing we underestimate how difficult it is for scientists to communicate effectively with a diversity of audiences, and for another most scientists do not receive formal training in science communication.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

6 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Critical Need for Public Science Understanding

    Public science understanding is essential for informed decisions, with climate change exemplifying how communication breakdowns lead to mistrust and misunderstanding.

    作为opening paragraph,第1段 establishes整篇文章的main concern:effective science communication的importance。通过presenting climate change这个dramatic example,它creates a sense of urgency,motivating readers去关注这个issue。这个段落serves as foundation,为后续paragraphs讨论communication的various aspects和challenges提供了contextual backdrop。它directly supports文章主旨中的"informed decision-making"和"issues like climate change"这两个key elements。

    识别中心论点+定位支撑实例
  2. P2

    From Public Understanding to Policy Impact

    Public acceptance of science directly influences governmental policy-making in regulation, science policy, and research funding.

    第2段 serves as bridge,connecting individual-level understanding到societal-level consequences。它expands文章主旨中implicit的idea:science communication不只是educational necessity,更是影响policy和funding的critical factor。这个段落strengthens overall argument by showing higher stakes,preparing readers for后续paragraphs关于specific scientific areas的discussion。它reinforces文章主旨中"informed decision-making"的broader implications。

    追踪因果链条+识别范围扩展
  3. P3

    Expanding the Communication Imperative Beyond Climate

    Effective science communication is crucial not only for climate issues but also for neuroscience and personalized medicine, where public understanding increasingly affects personal and policy decisions.

    第3段 significantly expands文章的scope,demonstrating that communication challenges pervade整个scientific landscape。通过introducing neuroscience和personalized medicine,它makes argument more comprehensive和personally relevant to readers。这个段落supports文章主旨中"issues like climate change and health"的部分,showing这不是isolated problems而是systemic challenges。它also foreshadows后续关于journalism和scientists' role的discussion,by establishing the widespread need for effective communication。

    标记过渡词+统计例证领域
  4. P4

    The Role and Challenge of Science Journalism

    Science journalism serves as the primary channel for communicating scientific information to the public, with effective journalists balancing accessibility and accuracy through their relationship with scientists.

    第4段 serves as pivotal transition point,shifting from discussing why和where communication matters到examining how it actually happens。通过establishing science journalism as central mechanism,它sets stage for critical analysis in后续paragraphs。这个段落connects to文章主旨的"oversimplified journalism"部分,首先presenting ideal scenario before examining failures。它provides necessary context:只有understanding journalism's proper role,readers才能appreciate后续关于its shortcomings和scientists' responsibilities的discussion。

    定位新主体+识别内在张力
  5. P5

    The Pitfalls of Oversimplified Science Reporting

    Science journalism often oversimplifies complex topics to the point of inaccuracy, particularly by exaggerating the health implications of basic research and creating unrealistic public expectations.

    第5段 delivers文章的first major critique,directly addressing文章主旨中"oversimplified journalism"的component。它provides concrete evidence for为什么science communication fails,balancing 第4段的positive portrayal of journalism's potential。这个段落crucial for overall argument因为它begins to分配responsibility:while later paragraphs会discuss scientists' role,这里clearly establishes that journalists也contribute to communication failures。它prepares readers for 第6段的more nuanced analysis of where blame actually lies。

    捕捉否定标记+评估严重程度
  6. P6

    Reframing Responsibility: Scientists' Communication Gap

    The blame for ineffective science communication should not rest solely with journalists, as scientists face underestimated challenges in communicating with diverse audiences and typically lack formal training in science communication.

    第6段 serves as文章的concluding argument,bringing together前面建立的elements into nuanced conclusion。它directly addresses文章主旨的最后component:"scientists' lack of formal communication training"。通过reframing blame from solely journalists到包括scientists' structural challenges,它presents more complete和fair的analysis。这个paragraph doesn't absolve journalists(第5段的critiques仍然valid),而是expands responsibility,arguing for"improvement from both sides"正如文章主旨所states。它positions effective communication as shared responsibility,requiring systemic changes particularly in scientists' training。

    识别反驳信号+提取替代解释
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

6 道逐段细节自检题

针对2018年12月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 widespread mistrust and misunderstanding climate change

    What has contributed to widespread mistrust and misunderstanding of scientists in the climate change debate?

    • A The public's inability to understand any scientific research.
    • B Scientists' deliberate refusal to share climate evidence.
    • C A breakdown in conveying fundamental climate data to the general public.
    • D Government restrictions on climate research funding.
    • E Journalists' exaggeration of medical breakthroughs.
    • F The increasing use of personalized medicine.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项完整保留了原文的因果骨架:breakdown 对应沟通失效,fundamental climate data 对应信息内容,general public 对应接受端。它没有把 scientists 与 public 的对立夸大为全部原因,而是用 a breakdown 保留原文的审慎限定。障碍在于原句被 not the least of which 插入结构拉长,许多考生会误把 communication 的总述当作答案,却漏掉 climate data 这个关键限定。

    结果词前扫 时间极紧时,不必先读完整句。直接抓题干的 widespread mistrust and misunderstanding,在 第1段 作字符串式回扫;然后只读取其前方最近的因果短语,并用“删词测试”判断。把每个选项代入“它是否能具体解释该结果”:只有正确项在删去修饰语后仍保留完整的传递失效机制,其余选项要么换了因果方向,要么增加了原文没有的主张。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 public acceptance and understanding of science research funding

    According to the passage, public acceptance and understanding of science can affect governmental decisions concerning what?

    • A Only the funding of climate change research.
    • B The accuracy standards of science journalism.
    • C Individual choices about personalized medicine.
    • D Regulation, science policy, and research funding.
    • E The selection of animal models for laboratory studies.
    • F The public release of individual genome data.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项按原文的并列顺序完整覆盖 regulation、science policy、research funding,范围与 with regard to 引出的内容一致。命题障碍在于三个名词跨越监管、政策、资金三个层面,考生若只记住 funding 或 policy,会被单项干扰项吸引;六级细节题常以“完整并列”区别正确概括与不完整概括。

    并列项整组匹配 先盯住题干末尾的 concerning what,而不是从 public 开始广泛扫描。用 governmental decisions 在 第2段 直接定位后,只看其后的 with regard to 结构;把逗号与 and 分开的并列项当作一个整体。随后采用“并列完整度”筛选:正确项覆盖原文列举的全部维度,任何只保留一项或另起类别的选项都可快速排除。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 non-scientists complex scientific information

    Why will more non-scientists need to analyze complex scientific information?

    • A They are expected to replace scientists in interpreting research results.
    • B Science journalists will no longer explain complex topics to the public.
    • C Government agencies will require universal genome testing.
    • D Public debate over animal models will soon disappear.
    • E To make decisions that directly affect their quality of life amid advances in genome sequencing and the advent of personalized medicine.
    • F Climate data will become simpler for the general public.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    正确项准确保留了原文的两层关系:advances in individual genome sequencing 与 the advent of personalized medicine 构成背景,to make decisions that directly affect their quality of life 则说明分析信息的用途。这里 directly affect 的主语是 decisions,宾语是 quality of life;正确项没有颠倒这一施受关系,也没有把 quality of life 擅自缩窄为 health-related decisions。命题障碍在于原因背景与实际用途分布在长句不同位置,考生需要把二者正确衔接。

    未来因果箭头 用题干中的 will need to 反向搜索同类未来情态,在 第3段 锁定句子后,不逐个翻译专业词。直接画出该句的“技术变化 -> 信息处理 -> 个人决策 -> 生活影响”箭头,再选择能闭合这条箭头的正确项。这个结构判定比比较 genome、health 等孤立词更快。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 good science journalists scientific accuracy

    What is the key role of good science journalists?

    • A Publishing scientific findings before other media outlets.
    • B Persuading the public to accept every scientific conclusion.
    • C Replacing scientists as the main source of scientific advances.
    • D Eliminating all disagreements about climate change.
    • E Providing formal communication training for scientists.
    • F Making complex topics accessible while maintaining scientific accuracy.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    正确项保留了原文两个不可拆分的标准:making complex topics accessible 与 adhering to scientific accuracy。maintaining 是对 adhering 的恰当改写,while 保留平衡关系。障碍在于部分考生只抓 accessible,忽略科学新闻不能为通俗而牺牲 accuracy;命题人正利用这一“易懂与准确兼顾”的双条件设置区分度。

    双标准钥匙 在 第4段 中直接跳到 good science journalists 后的谓语,不读前两句背景。把 while 前后各压缩成一个能力标签,再使用“双钥匙法”:正确项必须同时拥有“降低理解门槛”和“守住准确边界”两把钥匙。只含一把钥匙或转向其他职业目标的选项立即排除。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 basic discovery exaggerated

    What false expectation may result when a basic discovery is exaggerated in science journalism?

    • A A miraculous cure is likely to become available within a short time.
    • B The discovery has only limited significance for human health.
    • C Scientists will stop conducting basic medical research.
    • D All neurodegenerative diseases can be prevented immediately.
    • E Journalists will receive more formal science training.
    • F Government funding for research will be permanently reduced.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    正确项准确改写了公众认为 miraculous cure 在 a few months to years away 的错误预期。likely 对应公众的主观期待,而 within a short time 概括 months to years 的“过早可得”含义。障碍在于原文随后以 in reality 转向真实限制,考生容易误选“研究意义有限”这一事实端;题目问的是 false expectation,必须站在 public thinks 一侧作答。

    想象事实分栏 以 false expectation 为中心,在 第5段 找到 so that 与 when in reality 这组对照路标。不要逐句解释医学内容,只做“主观想象/客观事实”二分:正确项归入 public thinks 一栏;归入 reality 一栏的内容即使原文出现,也不能选。这种对照分栏能在极短时间内避开最强干扰项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 ineffective communication formal training in science communication

    What do the authors identify as important causes of ineffective communication of science?

    • A Journalists alone are responsible for communication failures.
    • B The difficulty of addressing diverse audiences is underestimated, and most scientists do not receive formal training in science communication.
    • C Scientists deliberately provide journalists with inaccurate information.
    • D The public has no interest in learning about scientific advances.
    • E Science journalism focuses too heavily on climate change.
    • F Personalized medicine has made scientific information unnecessary.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    正确项一一对应 for one thing 与 for another 两个并列原因:the difficulty of addressing diverse audiences is underestimated 对应 underestimate how difficult it is to communicate effectively with a diversity of audiences,most scientists do not receive formal training in science communication 则基本复现原文。障碍在于段首先提 journalists,制造惯性归因;答案必须跟随 We believe 之后的作者修正。同时,题干的 causes 为复数,正确项完整覆盖两项,避免单因漏答。

    转折后双因 在 第6段 中先不看段首 blame,而是直接用 authors 的立场信号 We believe 落点,再向右读取 for one thing 与 for another 两个分号式信息块。采用“转折后优先、并列全收”的判定法:正确项必须覆盖作者转折后的两项归因;停留在转折前、只含一个原因或引入强动机的选项可立即排除。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    科学传播失败导致的严重后果

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 climate change 这个 dramatic example 来 illustrate 一个 core problem:scientists 和 public 之间的 poor communication 会导致 widespread mistrust,进而引出 effective science communication 的 importance

    作为 introductory section,这个意群用 climate change crisis 作为 hook 来 establish 文章要 address 的 central issue,为后续 discussion 奠定 foundation,让 readers 意识到 science communication 不是 trivial matter 而是关乎 public decision-making 的 critical issue

    提出问题的严重性
  2. 分论点 P2

    科学传播影响政府决策

    这个 supporting point 从 climate change example 出发,explicitly 指出 public acceptance and understanding 会 directly influence governmental decision-making,包括 regulation、science policy 和 research funding 等 policy dimensions

    作为第一个 sub-argument,这个意群 extends introduction 中提到的 problem,specifically 说明 ineffective communication 的 tangible consequences,强化了 why this issue matters 的 reasoning,为 establish 文章的 urgency 和 relevance 提供 concrete evidence

    阐述传播失败的政策影响
  3. 分论点 P3

    科学传播的广泛重要性

    这个 sub-argument 用 'However' 作为 transitional signal,将 discussion 从 climate change 这个 hot issue expand 到 broader range 的 scientific topics,包括 neuroscience、genetic basis、stem cell therapy、animal models 等,并且进一步 point out 在 personalized medicine era,ordinary people 需要具备 analyzing complex scientific information 的 ability

    这个意群 serves 一个 crucial argumentative function:它 prevents 文章 topic 显得 too narrow or limited to one issue。通过 expanding scope 到 multiple scientific domains 和 individual health decisions,这个 section strengthens 文章的 overall argument by showing 这不是 isolated problem 而是 pervasive challenge

    拓展问题的适用范围
  4. 分论点 P4

    科学新闻的传播作用

    这个 section 将 focus shift 到 solution side,介绍 science journalism 作为 main channel 的 positive role:good science journalists 能够 make complex topics accessible 同时 maintain scientific accuracy,并且 emphasize 了 relationship between scientists and media 对 efficient transmission 的 shaping effect

    在 argumentative structure 中,这个意群 marks 一个 pivotal transition:从 problem description 转向 examining existing mechanisms。它 introduces journalism 这个 key player,为后续 critique 其 limitations 做 groundwork,体现了 balanced argumentation 的 approach

    指出传播的主要渠道
  5. 分论点 P5

    科学新闻的局限性

    这个 critical paragraph 用 'Unfortunately' 作为 clear signal,指出 science journalism 的 negative side:oversimplify and generalize 导致 basic information 被 obscured 或 wrong,以及 exaggerate health impact 造成 public 的 unrealistic expectations

    这个意群 provides essential balance 和 depth:它 acknowledges journalism 作为 main channel 的同时,critically examines 其 inherent problems。这个 critique 是 argumentation 的 crucial component,因为它 sets up 文章最后要 address 的 blame distribution 和 root causes

    揭示新闻简化的问题
  6. 结论 P6

    问题根源的重新定位

    这个 concluding section 用 'Even though' 引出 final argument,将 blame 从 traditionally targeted journalists 转向 broader perspective:scientists themselves 缺乏 formal training in communication,并且 underestimate 了 effective communication 的 difficulty。'We believe' 这个 explicit authorial voice 标志着 conclusive stance

    作为 conclusion,这个意群 completes 文章的 argumentative arc:它不仅 summarize 了 problem 的 multifaceted nature (journalism issues + scientist training gaps),更重要的是 repositions responsibility,提出 more nuanced understanding。这个 final reframing 是文章的 ultimate argumentative contribution

    指出科学家培训缺失
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 定位问题句 P1

    议论文的 opening paragraph 往往通过 presenting a problem 或 current situation 来 establish the context,这是作者 argumentation 的 foundation,能够帮助我们快速 grasp 文章要 address 什么 issue。

  2. 追踪问题扩展 P2 P3

    Middle paragraphs 在议论文中起到 developing and expanding 的作用,通过 multiple examples 或 different aspects 来 demonstrate 问题的 breadth and depth,这能帮助我们 understand 作者认为这个 issue 有多 significant。

  3. 锁定方案讨论 P4 P5

    议论文在 establish the problem 之后会 shift focus 到 how to solve it 或 what causes the difficulty,这个 turning point 往往出现在 middle-to-late paragraphs,通过识别这个 transition 可以判断作者的 argumentative direction。

  4. 提取末段论断 P6

    Final paragraph 在议论文中常常 deliver the key insight,即作者的 ultimate point 或 deepest analysis。这里会 identify the real problem 或 propose a comprehensive view,是 synthesize 全文 argument 的地方,也是 main thesis 最明确的位置。

  5. 议论文的 main thesis 通常不是单一句子能够 capture 的,而是由 problem statement + scope + solution assessment + cause analysis 共同构成的 complete argument。通过 tracing 这个 logical flow,我们能够 synthesize 一个 comprehensive thesis statement。

主旨信号词 critical P3 oversimplify P5 do not receive P6 for one thing...for another P6

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

有效的科学传播对公众做出明智决策至关重要(如气候变化和健康问题),但面临过度简化的新闻报道和科学家缺乏正式沟通培训的双重挑战,需要双方共同改进。
Effective science communication to the public is crucial for informed decision-making on issues like climate change and health, but it faces challenges from both oversimplified journalism and scientists' lack of formal communication training, requiring improvement from both sides.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

6 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • dramatic 显著的;引人注目的;戏剧性的

    我们首先看到dramatic修饰example,而这个example涉及serious的negative consequences。接着从word structure来看,drama root暗示了戏剧性、引人注目的特质。最后,后文描述的widespread mistrust证实了这个example确实very significant。把这些clues综合起来,dramatic在academic context中表示'显著的、引人注目的、令人印象深刻的'。

    形容词三角验证法
  • transmission 传递;传输;传播

    首先我们在syntactic structure中看到transmission连接了data和public,positioned在一个transfer的framework里。然后通过morphology,trans-和-mit的combination明确指向'sending across'这个core meaning。最后,第4段的parallel usage和efficient的modification都verify了transmission是指传递、传输这个process。

    抽象过程名词三步法
  • therapeutic 治疗的;医疗的

    我们首先observe到therapeutic修饰跟treating diseases相关的potential。接着从word structure发现therapy这个transparent root。最后,therapeutic和stem cell therapy的parallel positioning进一步solidifies其medical treatment的connotation。三条线索converge到同一个meaning:与治疗相关的。

    专业术语领域定位法
  • advent 到来;出现;问世

    首先通过与advances的parallel structure,我们establish了advent表示某种form的development。然后contextual analysis显示personalized medicine是new和emerging的,advent描述其arrival。最后etymology confirms了'coming'这个core meaning。综合这些clues,advent表示(新事物的)到来或出现。

    时序发展词汇推断法
  • oversimplify 过分简化;使过于简单

    我们首先从consequence看到oversimplify会导致information变得obscured或wrong,establishing它的negative nature。然后morphology直接reveals其meaning:over + simplify = 过度简化。最后,通过与good journalism的contrast,我们understand oversimplify的core problem是在simplification过程中loss of accuracy。

    前缀导向结果验证法
  • exaggerate 夸大;夸张;言过其实

    首先我们看到exaggerate制造了expectation和reality之间的significant gap,而reality总是'far more limited'。接着通过semantic field可知它和oversimplify一样都是distorting information的方式。最后morphology的ex-prefix暗示'going beyond'。综合起来,exaggerate意思是夸大、夸张,使某事看起来比实际更重要或更大。

    失真类型定位法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P1 P2

    作者通过 climate change 这个 the most dramatic example 来 illustrate 科学传播失败的 negative consequences。这个 concrete case 让抽象的 poor communication 问题变得 tangible and relatable,直接支撑了文章关于 effective science communication 重要性的 main argument。通过展示 widespread mistrust 和 misunderstanding 这样的实际后果,作者 effectively demonstrates 为什么公众需要 understand the basics of science。

    信号词 example for instance such as illustrate demonstrate case specifically particularly namely take...for example

    仿写: 写作时要选择 representative and impactful 的例子。首先用 transitional phrases 引入例子,比如 "Perhaps the most dramatic example" 或 "A notable case"。然后 elaborate on 这个例子的 specific details 和它如何 support 你的 thesis。最后 explicitly connect 例子和你的 main point。仿写模版:"Perhaps the most [adjective] example of [issue] is [specific case], where [detailed explanation] has contributed to [consequence], demonstrating [main point]."

  • 举例论证

    P3

    作者进一步 expand 举例范围,列举了 neuroscience issues 包括 genetic basis for behavior、stem cell therapy、animal models 等 specific areas。这些 concrete examples 展示科学传播的 importance 不仅限于 climate change,而是 extends to 多个 socially charged 领域。通过 multiple examples,作者 strengthens 论点的 breadth and applicability,证明 effective communication 是 widespread need 而非 isolated issue。

    信号词 example for instance such as illustrate demonstrate case specifically particularly namely take...for example

    仿写: 当需要 demonstrate 观点的 wide applicability 时,可以使用 multiple examples in succession。用 "such as" 引入一系列 parallel examples,注意保持 grammatical parallelism。结构可以是:"It is also critical for [field] issues such as [example 1], [example 2], or [example 3], areas where [consequence]." 这种 enumeration 能 create cumulative effect,让论点更加 compelling。

  • 因果论证

    P1 P2

    在 第1段 中,作者建立了 causal chain:"a breakdown in transmission" → "contributed to widespread mistrust and misunderstanding"。这个 cause-and-effect relationship 清晰地 establish 了科学传播失败与公众误解之间的 direct link。在 第2段,进一步说明 "public acceptance and understanding (or lack of it)" → "can influence governmental decision-making"。这种 causal reasoning 构建了整篇文章的 logical foundation,证明 effective communication 的 importance 不仅是 academic concern,而是有 real-world consequences on policy and funding。

    信号词 contribute to lead to result in cause because since as a result consequently therefore thus influence affect bring about

    仿写: 构建因果论证时要 clearly identify cause 和 effect。可以使用 explicit causal connectors 比如 "contribute to", "lead to", "result in", "influence"。结构建议:先描述 initial condition 或 action,然后用 causal connector 连接到 resulting outcome,最后 elaborate on 这个 consequence 的 significance。仿写模版:"[Factor A], not the least of which is [specific cause], has contributed to [specific effect], demonstrating [broader implication]."

  • 对比论证

    P4 P5

    在 第4段 和 第5段,作者 construct 了一个 sharp contrast:good science journalists 能够 "make complex topics accessible while adhering to scientific accuracy",但 unfortunately 有些 journalism "can oversimplify and generalize to the point that basic information is obscured or obviously wrong"。这个 positive-negative contrast 既 acknowledges science journalism 的 potential value,又 highlights 其 current problems。通过这种 juxtaposition,作者 balanced 地呈现了 issue 的 complexity,使论证更加 credible and nuanced。

    信号词 while however unfortunately in contrast on the other hand whereas but yet conversely nevertheless although even though

    仿写: 构建对比时要 establish clear parallel structure。先 present 一方面,用 transitional words 如 "however", "unfortunately", "in contrast" 引入 opposing side。注意保持 grammatical symmetry 让 contrast 更 striking。可以用 "while" 在同一句中 juxtapose:"Good journalists [positive quality], while [negative case] can [negative quality]." 仿写模版:"[Ideal situation with positive outcome]. Unfortunately, [contrasting reality] to the point that [negative consequence], demonstrating [problem that needs addressing]."

  • 因果论证

    P5 P6

    在 第5段,作者展示了另一层 causality:"oversimplify and generalize" → "basic information conveyed is obscured or wrong" → "public thinks miraculous cure is near when reality is far more limited"。这个 causal chain 揭示了 poor journalism 如何 step by step 导致 public misconception。在 第6段,作者指出 ineffective communication 的 root causes:"we underestimate difficulty" 和 "scientists lack formal training"。通过 trace back to underlying causes,作者 shift blame from journalists alone,构建了更 comprehensive understanding of the problem。

    信号词 contribute to lead to result in cause because since as a result consequently therefore thus influence affect bring about

    仿写: 对于 complex causal chains,可以 layer multiple causes 或 trace cascading effects。使用 "so that" 结构连接 intermediate and final effects:"[Action A] so that [immediate effect B], which leads to [ultimate consequence C]." 当 identify root causes 时,用 "exists because" 或 "lies in" 来 introduce fundamental reasons。仿写模版:"The problem exists because for one thing [cause 1], and for another [cause 2], demonstrating [underlying issue]."

  • 对比论证

    P6

    在 第6段,作者 present 了一个 important contrast:"too often the blame is placed on journalists" versus "at least part of the problem lies in places other than...journalists"。这个 contrast 挑战了 common assumption,将 responsibility 从 single target (journalists) 重新分配到 multiple parties including scientists。通过这个 shift in perspective,作者 complicate 了 simple blame narrative,推动读者 consider systemic issues rather than individual failings。这种 contrast 为文章的 concluding argument 奠定基础。

    信号词 while however unfortunately in contrast on the other hand whereas but yet conversely nevertheless although even though

    仿写: 用对比来 challenge assumptions 时,先 acknowledge common view ("too often...", "typically..."),然后用 "but" 或 "however" introduce alternative perspective。可以用 "We believe that" 或 "In reality" 来 assert 你的 contrasting position。结构:"Too often [common belief]. We believe that [contrasting reality], demonstrating [new understanding]." 这种 pattern 既 shows awareness of prevailing view 又 establish 你的 distinct argument。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 科学传播失败的严重后果

    P1
    Perhaps the most dramatic example of the negative consequences of poor communication between scientists and the public is the issue of climate change

    极端程度强调类 Perhaps the most dramatic example perhaps the most dramatic example the most striking case the worst instance particularly alarming especially troubling notably severe

    作者通过说 climate change 是 'most dramatic example' 来 convey 一个 implicit message:科学传播的 breakdown 不仅仅发生在 climate change 这一个 area,而是 pervasive problem。这个 implication 为整篇文章的 thesis 奠定基础,表明 effective science communication 的 importance 是 universal 而非 limited to specific topics。对 main argument 的作用是 establish 问题的 scope 和 urgency。

  • 科学理解缺失影响政策制定

    P2
    The issue of climate change also illustrates how the public acceptance and understanding of science (or the lack of it) can influence governmental decision-making

    递进补充类 also illustrates furthermore moreover additionally in addition equally important another dimension

    通过 'also illustrates',作者 implicitly conveys:科学传播问题的 consequences 不止是 public misunderstanding,还 extends to policy-making level。这个 implication 表明问题的 stakes 更 high,因为它 affects 不仅是 individual decisions 还有 systemic governmental choices。对 thesis 的作用是 escalate 问题的 importance,为后续 discuss solution 的 necessity 铺垫。

  • 科学传播重要性超越热点议题

    P3
    However, the importance of effective communication with a general audience is not limited to hot issues like climate change

    转折对比类 However however but yet nevertheless nonetheless on the other hand

    'However' 搭配 'not limited to' 这个 structure 传递的 implicit message 是:读者可能 mistakenly think 科学传播只在 high-profile controversial topics 比如 climate change 里 matter,但实际上它的 relevance 是 universal。这个 implication 帮助作者 establish 问题的 pervasiveness,为 discuss 更 broad range of examples 和最终 argue for systemic solutions 做铺垫。对 thesis 的作用是 expand applicability。

  • 科学新闻简化导致信息失真

    P5
    Unfortunately, pieces of science journalism can also oversimplify and generalize their subject material to the point that the basic information conveyed is obscured or at worst, obviously wrong

    情态评价类 Unfortunately unfortunately regrettably sadly disappointingly worryingly alarmingly

    'Unfortunately' 这个词 implicitly conveys:科学新闻的 oversimplification 是 problematic 但 common 的 phenomenon,不应该发生但 persistently exists。这个 implication 为作者后续 argue 需要 improvement 铺路,同时 subtly suggest 这个 issue 是 solvable if properly addressed。对 thesis 的作用是 identify journalism 作为问题的 one source,平衡 blame distribution。

  • 问题根源被误判

    P6
    too often the blame for ineffective communication is placed on the side of the journalists

    频率过度类 too often frequently commonly typically usually habitually repeatedly

    'Too often' 传递的 implicit message 是:把 blame 全部 assign to journalists 是一个 prevalent 但 inaccurate 的 tendency,需要被 questioned。这为作者 introduce 新的 perspective 即 scientists' lack of training 作为 contributing factor 做铺垫。言外之意是:问题的 root cause 比 commonly believed 更 complex,需要 more nuanced understanding。对 thesis 的作用是 shift focus to scientists' responsibility,为 argue comprehensive solution 奠定基础。

  • 问题根源的双重维度

    P6
    for one thing we underestimate how difficult it is for scientists to communicate effectively with a diversity of audiences, and for another most scientists do not receive formal training in science communication

    并列列举类 for one thing... for another on the one hand... on the other hand first... second partly... partly both... and not only... but also one reason... another reason

    并列结构 'for one thing... for another' 的 implicit message 是:ineffective communication 的 root causes 包括 both underestimation of difficulty 和 lack of training,暗示 solution 需要 address 这两个 dimensions。这个 implication 为作者最终 argue 需要 systematic training programs 或者 institutional changes 提供 logical foundation。对 thesis 的作用是 identify scientists' side 的 contributing factors,完成对问题的 balanced analysis。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Concerned advocacy for improving science communication)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 首段问题定性 P1

    议论文的首段通常是 thesis 的铺垫,作者在 第1段 用 'negative consequences' 和 'widespread mistrust' 这样的 negative 词汇描述 poor communication 的后果,说明作者对现状持 critical 的态度,并隐含着对改进的期待。

  2. 重要性强调词定向 P2 P3

    第2段 和 第3段 中反复出现 'is not limited to'、'is also critical'、'will need to be' 等强调科学传播 importance 的结构,说明作者不只是在陈述事实,而是在 advocate(倡导)公众科学素养的提升,态度是 proactive 且 positive 的。

  3. 转折后才是真立场 P4 P5

    第4段 先用 'Good science journalists are specialists' 给予 positive 评价,但 第5段 紧接着用 'Unfortunately' 转折,指出 science journalism 也会 'oversimplify' 和 'generalize'。这种 'acknowledge → but criticize' 的结构揭示作者的真实 concern 在于传播质量的不足,而非简单地否定 journalists。

  4. 末段第一人称定论 P6

    第6段 中 'We believe' 是最直接的 first-person stance marker,作者明确指出问题根源在于 scientists 缺乏 formal training in science communication,这是整篇文章 argument 的落点,也印证了作者的 concerned advocacy 态度——既有 concern(对现状不满),又有 advocacy(倡导改进 communication training)。

  5. 多段信号叠加综合定态度 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    综合四个步骤:首段用 negative framing 引出问题 → 中段用 necessity 词汇强调重要性 → 借 concession-contrast 指出 journalism 的不足 → 末段用 'We believe' 明确问题根源并隐含改进建议。作者始终站在 proactive 立场,既不是纯粹的 neutral 旁观者,也不是激烈的 hostile critic,而是 concerned advocate——对现状有 critical awareness,同时 support 通过改善 training 和 communication 来解决问题。

文中的态度信号词

  • negative consequences P1

    'negative consequences' 作为 第1段 的核心 evaluative phrase,直接对 poor science communication 的结果作出 negative judgment,奠定了作者对现状 critical 的基调,同时暗示作者 support 改变这一状况,体现其 concerned 的 advocacy 立场。

    同类词 widespread mistrust misunderstanding breakdown poor communication

  • is also critical P3

    'is also critical' 是 第3段 中一个典型的 importance marker,作者用它将 effective science communication 的必要性从 climate change 这一 hot issue 扩展到更广泛的 neuroscience 领域,强化了其对科学传播重要性的 advocacy,态度鲜明且 proactive。

    同类词 is not limited to will need to be comfortable must be able to the importance of

  • Unfortunately P5

    'Unfortunately' 是一个典型的 adversative discourse marker,它标志着作者从对 science journalism 的 positive acknowledgment 转向 critical assessment,揭示作者对 oversimplification 问题的 concern。这个词直接承载作者的 negative appraisal,是判断作者 critical awareness 的关键 signal。

    同类词 at worst oversimplify generalize obscured obviously wrong

  • We believe P6

    'We believe' 是整篇文章中最直接的 first-person stance marker,作者用它明确表达自己的 position:problem 的根源不只在 journalists,还在于 scientists 缺乏 communication training。这个词标志着作者从 describing 问题转向 diagnosing 根因,体现其 engaged advocacy 的态度,而非旁观式的 neutral commentary。

    同类词 We argue We suggest It is our view that we underestimate

  • too often the blame P6

    'too often' 是一个典型的 frequency-based criticism marker,作者用它暗示将 blame 单方面归咎于 journalists 是一种不公正且过于普遍的做法,隐含着对这一 oversimplification 的 critical disapproval,并引出作者自己的 alternative diagnosis,进一步强化其 constructive critical 的立场。

    同类词 too often at least part of the problem for one thing … for another exists because

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开头提出问题 P1

    说明文会 objectively explain facts,新闻报道会 report events chronologically,但议论文的 opening 会 frame 一个 arguable issue 或 problem statement,为后续的 argumentation 做铺垫。这篇文章开头就 highlight 了 poor communication 导致的 negative consequences,这是典型的 problem-centered opening。

  2. 主张重要性 P1 P2 P3

    说明文的 purpose 是 to inform,新闻是 to report,但议论文是 to persuade 或 to argue for a viewpoint。文中反复强调 'importance of effective communication'、'critical for'、'need to be comfortable analyzing' 这些都是在 build up 一个 argument,而非单纯 explain facts。

  3. 例证支撑论点 P2 P3 P4

    说明文会用 examples 来 illustrate different aspects of a topic 平行展开,新闻会 report separate events,但议论文的 examples 都会 converge toward 同一个 argumentative purpose。这里所有 examples 都在 demonstrate 为什么 effective science communication matters,而不是分别 explain different topics。

  4. 批判现状提建议 P5 P6

    说明文不会 assign blame 或 advocate change,新闻可能 report criticism 但保持 neutral stance,而议论文会明确 evaluate current situations 并 push for improvements。最后两段清楚地 critique 现状('oversimplify'、'exaggerate'、'blame')并 argue for 不同的 approach('we underestimate'、'do not receive formal training')。

  5. 四要素综合判断 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    这篇文章完整展现了 argumentative structure:opening 用 dramatic example establish problem urgency,middle paragraphs use varied evidence build the case for effective communication,closing paragraphs critique current approaches 并 suggest root causes。整体 flow 是 problem → importance → current failure → root cause analysis,这是典型的 persuasive argumentation pattern。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • must be able to P1 观点引导词 must should need to ought to it is essential that
  • Perhaps the most dramatic example P1 论证逻辑连接词 for example for instance such as a case in point to illustrate
  • not the least of which P1 立场表态词 notably importantly significantly particularly especially
  • also illustrates how P2 论证逻辑连接词 illustrate demonstrate show reveal indicate
  • However P3 论证逻辑连接词 however nevertheless nonetheless yet still
  • not limited to P3 立场表态词 not only... but also not merely beyond more than go further than
  • Furthermore P3 论证逻辑连接词 furthermore moreover additionally in addition besides
  • Unfortunately P5 立场表态词 unfortunately regrettably sadly disappointingly alarmingly
  • can also oversimplify P5 立场表态词 can lead to may result in tends to is likely to has the potential to
  • We believe that P6 立场表态词 I believe we believe I argue that I contend that in my view
  • too often P6 立场表态词 frequently commonly typically usually generally
  • at least part of P6 论证逻辑连接词 at least partly in part to some extent to a degree
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

6 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 的常见问题

2018年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 文章 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 的原文出自哪里?
美国国立生物技术信息中心网站www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov一篇题为 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training(科学向大众的传播:为何我们需要将该技能纳入正规的科学培训,对本科生以及研究生进行传授)的文章。
2018年12月英语六级真题第1套文章 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 的主旨是什么?
有效的科学传播对公众做出明智决策至关重要(如气候变化和健康问题),但面临过度简化的新闻报道和科学家缺乏正式沟通培训的双重挑战,需要双方共同改进。(英文表述:Effective science communication to the public is crucial for informed decision-making on issues like climate change and health, but it faces challenges from both oversimplified journalism and scientists' lack of formal communication training, requiring improvement from both sides.)
Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training(2018年12月英语六级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是积极支持(Concerned advocacy for improving science communication)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 422 词、6 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2018年12月英语六级真题第1套文章 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 6 段按议论文骨架分为 6 个意群:引言 · 第1段——科学传播失败导致的严重后果;分论点 · 第2段——科学传播影响政府决策;分论点 · 第3段——科学传播的广泛重要性;分论点 · 第4段——科学新闻的传播作用;分论点 · 第5段——科学新闻的局限性;结论 · 第6段——问题根源的重新定位。
Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Concerned advocacy for improving science communication)。判断路径:首段问题定性 → 重要性强调词定向 → 转折后才是真立场 → 末段第一人称定论 → 多段信号叠加综合定态度;文中的态度信号词包括 negative consequences(第1段)、is also critical(第3段)、Unfortunately(第5段)、We believe(第6段)、too often the blame(第6段)。
2018年12月英语六级真题第1套文章 Science Communication to The General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 6 个:dramatic(显著的;引人注目的;戏剧性的)、transmission(传递;传输;传播)、therapeutic(治疗的;医疗的)、advent(到来;出现;问世)、oversimplify(过分简化;使过于简单)、exaggerate(夸大;夸张;言过其实),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: