2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 · Part III Section C (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2)

新闻报道 · 阅读理解(四选一) · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇新闻报道全文 449 词、8 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Industrial fishing for krill(磷虾) in the unspoilt waters around Antarctica is threatening the future of one of the world's last great wildernesses, according to a new report.

The study by Greenpeace analysed the movements of krill fishing vessels in the region and found they were increasingly operating "in the immediate vicinity of penguin colonies and whale-feeding grounds". It also highlights incidents of fishing boats being involved in groundings, oil spills and accidents, which posed a serious threat to the Antarctic ecosystem.

The report, published on Tuesday, comes amid growing concern about the impact of fishing and climate change on the Antarctic. A global campaign has been launched to create a network of ocean sanctuaries to protect the seas in the region and Greenpeace is calling for an immediate halt to fishing in areas being considered for sanctuary status.

Frida Bengtsson from Greenpeace's Protect the Antarctic campaign said: "If the krill industry wants to show it's a responsible player, then it should be voluntarily getting out of any area which is being proposed as an ocean sanctuary, and should instead be backing the protection of these huge tracts of the Antarctic."

A global campaign has been launched to turn a huge tract of Antarctic seas into ocean sanctuaries protecting wildlife and banning not just krill fishing, but all fishing. One was created in the Ross Sea in 2016, another reserve is being proposed in a vast area of the Weddell Sea, and a third sanctuary is under consideration in the area west of the Antarctic Peninsula—a key krill fishing area.

The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) manages the seas around Antarctica. It will decide on the Weddell Sea sanctuary proposal at a conference in Australia in October, although a decision on the peninsula sanctuary is not expected until later.

Keith Reid, a science manager at CCAMLR, said that the organisation sought "a balance between protection, conservation and sustainable fishing in the Southern Ocean." He said although more fishing was taking place nearer penguin colonies it was often happening later in the season when these colonies were empty.

"The creation of a system of marine protected areas is a key part of ongoing scientific and policy discussions in CCAMLR," he added. "Our long-term operation in the region depends on a healthy and thriving Antarctic marine ecosystem, which is why we have always had an open dialogue with the environmental non-governmental organisations. We strongly intend to continue this dialogue, including talks with Greenpeace, to discuss improvements based on the latest scientific data. We are not the ones to decide on the establishment of marine protected areas, but we hope to contribute positively with our knowledge and experience."

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

8 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Krill Fishing Threatens Antarctica

    Industrial krill fishing is threatening Antarctica's wilderness.

    这一段承担 lead paragraph 的功能,它先抛出“磷虾捕捞威胁南极”的总问题,为后文的证据、环保组织诉求和管理机构回应搭建了叙述框架。

    捕捞威胁南极
  2. P2

    Evidence of Ecological Risks

    Greenpeace found that krill fishing endangers Antarctic wildlife and ecosystems.

    本段为文章主旨提供 factual support,它把第一段较笼统的威胁转化为可观察的捕鱼地点和具体事故,因此增强了 Greenpeace 呼吁限制捕鱼的说服力。

    船只近栖息地且事故频发
  3. P3

    Call for Sanctuary Protection

    Growing environmental concern has led Greenpeace to demand fishing bans in proposed sanctuaries.

    该段连接“危害证据”和“保护行动”:它说明为何保护区议题变得紧迫,并首次明确 Greenpeace 的 immediate halt 立场,直接呼应全文主旨中的政策要求。

    担忧升级,要求禁渔
  4. P4

    Greenpeace Pressures the Krill Industry

    Greenpeace urges the krill industry to voluntarily support proposed ocean sanctuaries.

    本段将 Greenpeace 的组织诉求人格化为发言人的直接表态,使文章从客观报告进入立场交锋,同时进一步强化“拟议保护区应停止捕捞”的中心观点。

    要求行业主动退出
  5. P5

    Antarctic Sanctuary Plans

    Antarctic ocean sanctuary plans aim to ban fishing in key wildlife areas.

    本段具体展示了保护方案的 geographical scope,尤其指出 Antarctic Peninsula 西部是关键磷虾捕捞区,从而解释该区域为何成为环保与渔业利益冲突的焦点。

    三处保护区布局
  6. P6

    CCAMLR's Pending Decisions

    CCAMLR will consider Antarctic sanctuary proposals on different schedules.

    本段把环保组织的倡议放入正式 governance process 中,说明保护区能否落地取决于 CCAMLR 的审议,也为下文该机构的回应作了铺垫。

    委员会分期审议
  7. P7

    CCAMLR Defends Balanced Management

    CCAMLR defends a balance between conservation and sustainable fishing.

    这一段引入与 Greenpeace 不完全相同的 institutional perspective,使报道更具平衡性;它既承认捕鱼更靠近企鹅群落,也用季节因素为渔业活动作出解释。

    兼顾保护与捕捞
  8. P8

    CCAMLR Calls for Dialogue and Science

    CCAMLR supports dialogue and scientific input on marine protection, but does not make the final decisions.

    作为报道结尾,本段完善了 CCAMLR 的官方形象:它强调生态健康、科学依据和与 Greenpeace 的沟通,同时说明最终建立保护区仍需其他决策程序,从而使全文在争议中保持开放结局。

    对话供科学意见
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

8 道逐段细节自检题

针对2019年12月英语六级真题第2套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 great wildernesses

    What is threatening one of the world's last great wildernesses?

    • A Climate change.
    • B The creation of ocean sanctuaries.
    • C Industrial fishing for krill.
    • D Penguin colonies.
    • E Scientific reporting.
    • F The Antarctic ecosystem.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    原文明确把 industrial fishing for krill 作为 threatening 的主语。正确项保留了行为、对象和规模三个关键信息,没有把气候变化或保护措施误当成威胁。

    威胁主语三要素核对 直接检查题干谓语 threatening 的主语类型,并寻找同时包含 activity、resource 和 scale 的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 fishing vessels

    Where were krill fishing vessels increasingly operating?

    • A In the Ross Sea sanctuary.
    • B Far from all wildlife colonies.
    • C Only in the Weddell Sea.
    • D In the immediate vicinity of penguin colonies and whale-feeding grounds.
    • E Inside penguin colonies.
    • F At established oil-spill response stations.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项完整对应 increasingly operating in the immediate vicinity of penguin colonies and whale-feeding grounds,准确保留了地点关系和两类地点,避免了把企鹅群落错误概括为觅食区。

    地点关系逐项对齐 先扫描所有选项中的地点和距离表达,再用 fishing vessels 作为锚点核对 immediate vicinity、penguin colonies 与 whale-feeding grounds。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 Greenpeace

    What is Greenpeace calling for?

    • A A network of ocean sanctuaries immediately.
    • B More fishing in sanctuary areas.
    • C An end to all climate-change research.
    • D A conference in Australia in October.
    • E An immediate halt to fishing in areas being considered for sanctuary status.
    • F Voluntary withdrawal from every Antarctic sea.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项准确对应 Greenpeace is calling for an immediate halt to fishing,并保留了适用范围 areas being considered for sanctuary status。

    呼吁结构三点核对 扫描 Greenpeace 后面的 call for 结构,直接核对 halt、fishing 和 sanctuary status 三个语义组件。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 responsible player

    What should the krill industry do to demonstrate responsibility?

    • A Expand fishing into proposed sanctuaries.
    • B Wait for a legal ban before leaving.
    • C Stop supporting Antarctic protection.
    • D Transfer all fishing to the Ross Sea.
    • E Publish a report on whale feeding.
    • F Voluntarily get out of areas proposed as ocean sanctuaries.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项准确概括 voluntarily getting out of any area which is being proposed as an ocean sanctuary,保留了自愿性、退出行为和区域范围。

    条件句主句提取 直接定位 responsible player,随后只读取 should 后的动词短语和其范围修饰语。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 ocean sanctuaries

    What is prohibited in the proposed ocean sanctuaries?

    • A All fishing, including krill fishing.
    • B Only krill fishing.
    • C Scientific research.
    • D Whale feeding.
    • E Dialogue with environmental groups.
    • F All activity west of the peninsula.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    原文明确说 banning not just krill fishing, but all fishing。正确项准确体现由特定捕捞扩大到全部捕捞的逻辑。

    并列禁令范围扩展 只扫描 banning not just...but...结构,利用后半句的最大范围判断正确项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 Weddell Sea sanctuary proposal

    When will CCAMLR decide on the Weddell Sea sanctuary proposal?

    • A Later, with no date specified.
    • B At a conference in Australia in October.
    • C In the Ross Sea in 2016.
    • D At a Greenpeace meeting in September.
    • E After the peninsula decision.
    • F During the current fishing season.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    原文明确说 it will decide ... at a conference in Australia in October。正确项完整保留了会议形式、地点和时间。

    事件时间同句提取 将 Weddell Sea 与 decide 组成事件短语扫描,直接提取同句的 Australia 和 October。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 Keith Reid

    Why did Keith Reid say fishing near penguin colonies was often less harmful than it appeared?

    • A The vessels operated far from penguin colonies.
    • B The colonies were protected by fishing boats.
    • C It often occurred later in the season when the colonies were empty.
    • D Fishing had completely stopped near the colonies.
    • E The colonies contained fewer whales.
    • F The season was shortened by climate change.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项准确对应 often happening later in the season when these colonies were empty,说明空间接近并不必然意味着当时有企鹅受到干扰。

    时间条件解释地点风险 定位 Keith Reid 后优先读取 later in the season 与 colonies were empty 这一时间和状态组合。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 open dialogue

    What does CCAMLR intend to continue?

    • A The establishment of all marine protected areas.
    • B Fishing without considering scientific data.
    • C The closure of every Antarctic fishing ground.
    • D An open dialogue with environmental non-governmental organisations, including Greenpeace.
    • E A campaign against environmental organisations.
    • F The decision on the Weddell Sea proposal.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    原文明确说 they have always had an open dialogue,并表示 strongly intend to continue this dialogue, including talks with Greenpeace。正确项准确概括了持续的行动和对象。

    继续对象直接提取 定位 open dialogue 后,直接核对 strongly intend to continue 的宾语及 including 后的参与对象。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

8 个意群的新闻报道骨架

按新闻报道 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 导语:磷虾捕捞威胁南极生态

    这个 lead paragraph 直击核心,用 industrial fishing 和 threatening 这两个关键词,开门见山地 present 了新闻的 main issue:南极周边的 krill fishing 正在威胁这片 wilderness 的 future

    作为新闻报道的 opening,这个意群用简洁有力的 language 建立了 central concern,为后续展开的 detailed analysis 和 multiple perspectives 奠定 foundation

    点明威胁源头
  2. 研究证据:捕捞船只活动与事故

    这个意群通过 Greenpeace study 提供 concrete evidence,用 analysed movements 和 specific findings 来 substantiate 导语中的 threat claim,特别强调 fishing vessels 在 penguin colonies 和 whale-feeding grounds 附近 operating,以及 groundings、oil spills 等 incidents

    作为新闻报道的 body 部分第一层,这个意群用 authoritative source 和 empirical data 将抽象的 threat 具象化,增强 credibility 并为读者提供 factual basis

    提供调查数据
  3. 背景拓展:保护运动与呼吁

    这个意群通过 comes amid 这个 temporal connector 将 report 置于更广阔的 context 中,introduce 了 global campaign 和 ocean sanctuaries 的 concept,同时传达 Greenpeace 的 specific call:immediate halt to fishing in proposed sanctuary areas

    这个意群在新闻报道中起 contextualizing 作用,将 isolated incident 连接到 broader movement,并 introduce 关键的 solution-oriented angle,为后续 detailed discussion of sanctuaries 做 preparation

    引入保护方案
  4. 观点引述:环保组织诉求

    这个意群通过 direct quotation 让 Greenpeace representative Frida Bengtsson 发声,articulate 了对 krill industry 的具体 expectations:voluntarily exiting proposed sanctuary areas 并 backing protection efforts,这是典型的 advocacy voice in news reporting

    在新闻报道的 multi-perspective structure 中,这个意群 represent 环保方的 position,用 first-person voice 增强 immediacy 和 persuasive force,让 abstract threat 转化为 concrete demands

    明确行动要求
  5. 方案详述:三大海洋保护区

    这个意群 elaborate on 前面提到的 ocean sanctuaries concept,提供 specific details:global campaign 的 scope,以及三个 sanctuary proposals 的 geographic locations 和 current status (Ross Sea 已建立,Weddell Sea 和 Peninsula area 在 consideration 中)

    这个意群在新闻报道中提供 crucial background information,让读者 understand 保护区 initiative 的 scale 和 geographic specificity,为理解后续的 decision-making process 建立 necessary context

    列举保护区方案
  6. 机构介绍:决策主体与时间线

    这个意群 introduce key institutional player CCAMLR,explain 它的 management role over Antarctic seas,并提供 specific timeline:Weddell Sea proposal 将在 October conference 决定,peninsula sanctuary decision 预计 later

    在新闻报道中,这个意群 clarify decision-making authority 和 process,让读者 understand who has the power 和 when decisions will be made,为故事提供 institutional framework

    说明决策机制
  7. 对立观点:管理机构立场(第一部分)

    这个意群 introduce CCAMLR science manager Keith Reid 的 perspective,强调 organization seeks balance between protection 和 sustainable fishing,并 address Greenpeace 的 concern by explaining fishing near colonies 发生在 colonies empty 的 later season

    这个意群在新闻报道中 provide crucial balance,present 与环保组织 different 的 perspective,让读者 see industry/management side 的 rationale,体现 journalistic objectivity

    呈现平衡立场
  8. 对立观点:管理机构立场(第二部分)

    这个意群继续 present Reid 的观点,但 shift focus to CCAMLR 的 proactive approach:marine protected areas 是 ongoing discussions 的 key part,强调与 environmental NGOs 的 open dialogue commitment,并 clarify 他们的 contributory role (不是 decision makers,但提供 knowledge and experience)

    作为新闻报道的 closing voice,这个意群用 collaborative, forward-looking tone 为故事提供 relatively positive ending,balance 前面的 confrontational elements,暗示 potential for resolution

    展示合作态度
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段锁定问题主体 P1

    第一段出现了 threatening 这个强烈的 negative word,同时明确指出 industrial fishing for krill 和 Antarctica 这两个 key elements,这种开门见山的 structure 是新闻报道的典型 pattern,能让我们立即抓住文章要讨论的 central problem

  2. 权威来源佐证论点 P2

    第二段以 The study by Greenpeace 开头,这个 credible source 提供了 concrete evidence,包括 movements of fishing vessels 和 specific threats 如 oil spills and accidents,这些 factual details 强化并扩展了首段提出的 threat,让我们确认文章主旨确实围绕 ecological threat 展开

  3. 行动呼吁显示倾向 P3 P4 P5

    第三、四段出现了 global campaign、calling for an immediate halt、should be voluntarily getting out 这些 strong action phrases,这些 urgent appeals 不仅反映了 problem 的 seriousness,也明确了文章的 advocacy stance,即支持 protection measures 反对 current fishing practices

  4. 平衡观点权重分析 P7 P8

    第七、八段出现了 CCAMLR 的 perspective,Keith Reid 提到 balance between protection and fishing,但这个 counterpoint 出现在 latter half,且篇幅相对较少,说明它更多是为了 journalistic balance 而非文章的 main thrust。文章的 dominant narrative 仍然是 environmental threat 和 protection urgency

  5. 将各部分组合起来,我们看到一条清晰的 logical thread:problem identification (第1段) → evidence presentation (第2段) → solution advocacy (第3段-5) → industry response (第6段-8)。虽然包含了 different voices,但 article's weight 明显倾向 environmental protection,这正是 main idea 的 essence

主旨信号词 threatening P1 unspoilt P1 immediate vicinity P2 serious threat P2 calling for P3 immediate halt P3 responsible player P4 balance P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

南极洲附近的工业磷虾捕捞活动威胁生态系统,渔船在企鹅栖息地和鲸鱼觅食区附近作业。绿色和平组织报告了渔船事故和石油泄漏事件,呼吁在拟建海洋保护区立即停止捕捞,而南极海洋生物资源养护委员会寻求在保护与可持续捕捞之间取得平衡。
Industrial krill fishing near Antarctica threatens the ecosystem by operating close to penguin colonies and whale-feeding grounds. Greenpeace reports accidents and oil spills from fishing vessels, urging immediate halt in proposed ocean sanctuary areas while CCAMLR seeks balance between conservation and sustainable fishing.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • unspoilt 未受破坏的、原始的、保持自然状态的

    让我们把这些 clues 串起来。首先从 word structure 看,un- 表示否定,spoilt 意味着被破坏,合在一起就是「未被破坏」。然后看 semantic context,这片 waters 被称为 wilderness,是 world's last great 之一,说明它很 precious 且保持着 natural state。最后看 contrast,industrial fishing 正在 threatening 这个 unspoilt 的地方,这种 before-and-after 的逻辑告诉我们,unspoilt 描述的是被威胁之前的那种 pristine condition。

    前缀拆解结合语境对比验证
  • vicinity 邻近地区、周边区域、附近范围

    综合来看,sentence structure 告诉我们这是个 location expression,topic context 表明在讨论 vessels 的 spatial position relative to colonies,而 immediate 这个 adjective 强调了 closeness。把这三条 clues 结合起来:vicinity 应该指某个 surrounding area,而 immediate vicinity 就是「紧邻的周边区域」。这样理解在 conservation context 中完全 make sense——fishing boats 在 penguin colonies 附近活动会对它们造成 disturbance。

    介词搭配加修饰词语义缩小范围
  • grounding 搁浅、触礁

    把 clues 整合起来看。从 morphology,-ing 表示 action 或 state,ground 和「地面」有关。从 parallel structure,groundings 和 oil spills、accidents 这些 negative maritime events 并列。从 logical consequence,这些 incidents 威胁 ecosystem,说明 groundings 是对 environment 有害的 boat incident。结合 ground 的 literal meaning 和 maritime context,最合理的 interpretation 是船触碰到海底或岸边——也就是「搁浅」。

    动名词词根加并列对比确定语义
  • tract 大片土地、大片区域、地带

    整合这些 evidence。从 collocation 看,huge tract of seas/Antarctic 表明 tract 是可以用 size adjectives 修饰的 geographic unit。从 repetition 和 context 看,tract 多次出现在讨论 Antarctic regions 和 ocean sanctuaries 的 sentences 中,和 seas、areas 等词 co-occur。从 thematic coherence 看,整个 article 关于保护 large marine areas,tract 正是用来指代这些 expansive regions 的 term。

    专业语境多次复现归纳语义特征
  • thriving 繁荣的、兴旺的、茁壮成长的

    综合分析这些 clues。从 grammatical function,thriving 是 descriptive adjective 表示某种 state。从 parallelism,它和 healthy 并列,说明 semantic orientation 也是 positive。从 dependency logic,fishery operation 的可持续性依赖这样的 ecosystem,说明 thriving 描述的是一种 prosperous、flourishing 的 state。结合 ecosystem context,thriving 应该表示「繁荣生长、兴旺发达」。

    并列词语义对比加逻辑依赖验证
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 引语运用

    P4 P7 P8

    文章引用了 Greenpeace 的 Frida Bengtsson 和 CCAMLR 的 Keith Reid 的 direct quotes,通过 authority figures 的 statements 来增强 credibility。Bengtsson 的话强调了 krill industry 应该 voluntarily 退出 proposed sanctuary areas,体现了 environmental advocacy 的 stance;而 Reid 的 comments 则呈现了 conservation organization 寻求 balance 的 perspective,这种 dual voices 让 readers 能够从 multiple angles 理解这个 complex issue,避免了 one-sided reporting。

    信号词 said stated noted added commented explained argued claimed emphasized warned acknowledged according to

    仿写: 写作时要 strategically 选择 quotable statements,优先使用那些 clearly express 某个 position 或 reveal key information 的话。建议先 introduce the speaker 的 credentials,然后用 said/stated/noted 等 reporting verbs 引出 quotation。模版:[Organization/Title] + [Name] + [reporting verb]: "[Direct quote that makes a clear point]." 比如:Environmental scientist Dr. Zhang stated: "The data clearly shows a 30% decline in biodiversity over the past decade."

  • 数据引用

    P5 P6

    文章提到了 specific examples 如 Ross Sea sanctuary 在 2016 年的 creation,以及 proposed reserves 在 Weddell Sea 和 Antarctic Peninsula 等 concrete geographical references。虽然没有大量 statistical data,但这些 factual details 和 temporal markers(October conference)提供了 verifiable information,让 abstract threats 变得 tangible。这种 grounding in facts 强化了文章关于 urgent conservation needs 的 argument,因为 readers 能看到 actual initiatives 和 timelines。

    信号词 in 2016 at a conference in October one another third later

    仿写: 使用 specific figures 时要确保它们 directly support 你的 main point。建议将 data 嵌入 context 中,而不是 isolated presentation。可以用 temporal markers(in 2016, by 2025)、geographical specifics(Weddell Sea area)、或 quantitative measures 来增加 precision。模版:[Time marker/Location], [specific data/fact], [brief explanation of significance]. 例如:Since 2015, ocean temperatures have risen by 1.5°C in this region, accelerating ice melt rates.

  • 客观描述

    P1 P2 P6 P7

    文章开篇用 neutral language 描述了 krill fishing vessels 的 movements 和它们与 penguin colonies、whale-feeding grounds 的 proximity。用 "analysed the movements"、"increasingly operating" 这样的 factual terms 而非 emotional language,让 reporting 显得 impartial。这种 objective tone 在呈现 groundings、oil spills 等 incidents 时也保持了,用 "posed a serious threat" 而不是 more inflammatory expressions,这 establishes reader trust 并让 subsequent arguments 更有 persuasive power。

    信号词 analysed found operating highlights posed comes amid manages sought

    仿写: Practice 使用 descriptive verbs 和 nouns 而非 evaluative adjectives。选择 specific, observable terms(operating, analysed, posed)而不是 judgmental ones(recklessly destroying, carelessly damaging)。建议 structure sentences 以 facts 为中心:[Subject] + [neutral verb] + [observable action/state]. 模版:Research teams documented [specific observable phenomenon] in [location], which resulted in [measurable outcome]. 例如:Scientists recorded a 40% reduction in krill populations near fishing zones over five years.

  • 背景交代

    P3

    第三段用 "comes amid growing concern" 这个 phrase 来 contextualize 当前的 report within broader concerns about climate change 和 fishing impact。这个 background information 解释了为什么这个 issue 现在 particularly relevant,以及为什么 global campaign 已经 launched。通过 establishing 这个 larger context,文章让 readers 理解这不是 isolated incident,而是 part of a larger pattern of environmental challenges,这 amplifies the urgency 和 significance of the reported information。

    信号词 comes amid against the backdrop of in the context of following amid growing as part of in light of with the background of

    仿写: Use transitional phrases 来 introduce background context,让 current news 和 broader trends 之间的 connection 清晰。建议在 main report 之后 strategically place background,用 "comes amid" 或 "against the backdrop of" 这类 expressions。模版:[Current event/report] comes amid/follows [broader trend/ongoing concern], which has [resulted in/led to] [relevant development]. 例如:The new policy announcement comes amid rising unemployment rates, which have prompted widespread calls for economic reform.

  • 对比手法

    P4 P7 P8

    文章通过 juxtaposing Greenpeace 的 environmental advocacy stance 和 CCAMLR 的 balanced approach 来呈现 different perspectives。Greenpeace calls for "immediate halt",而 CCAMLR seeks "a balance between protection, conservation and sustainable fishing"。这个 contrast 揭示了 conservation 和 economic interests 之间的 tension,让 readers 看到这个 issue 的 complexity。通过 presenting both sides,文章避免了 appearing one-sided,同时 highlights the core dilemma:如何 protect ecosystems 的同时 maintain economic activities。

    信号词 while however although but whereas on the other hand in contrast conversely instead

    仿写: Identify two or more distinct positions 或 approaches to the issue,然后 structure your writing 让这些 differences 清晰 evident。Use contrasting language(while X argues for..., Y maintains that...)或 parallel structures 来 emphasize differences。模版:While [Party A] advocates for [position/action], [Party B] argues that [contrasting position/action], highlighting [the key tension/trade-off]. 例如:While environmental groups push for total ban on plastics, industry representatives argue that gradual phase-out is more economically viable, revealing the tension between environmental urgency and economic stability.

  • 设问引导

    P5 P6

    虽然文章没有 explicit rhetorical questions,但它通过 presenting the problem(krill fishing threatens ecosystems)然后 introducing potential solutions(ocean sanctuaries, protected areas)来 create an implicit question structure:"What can be done?" 第五段关于 sanctuary proposals 和第六段关于 CCAMLR 的 decision-making process 实际上是在 address 这个 underlying question。这种 problem-solution structure 引导 readers 思考 possible responses,creating engagement through suggesting answers to concerns raised earlier。

    信号词 how what why whether should can will the question is remains to be seen

    仿写: Structure your article 让 natural questions arise from presented information,然后 provide answers progressively。可以用 explicit questions("How can this be addressed?")或通过 problem-solution organization 来 create implicit question structure。模版:[Present problem/concern] → [Implicit or explicit question about solution] → [Introduce proposed solutions/actions being taken]. 例如:Urban air pollution has reached critical levels in major cities. What measures can reduce emissions effectively? Several municipalities have now implemented...(或不用 explicit question,直接 transition to solutions).

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

7 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 磷虾捕捞威胁南极生态纯净性

    P1
    Industrial fishing for krill in the unspoilt waters around Antarctica is threatening the future of one of the world's last great wildernesses

    对比类 unspoilt pristine untouched virgin intact uncontaminated pure

    Unspoilt 这个词的使用暗示了一个强烈的 implied message:南极原本是 humanity's last untouched frontier,现在 industrial fishing 正在 violate 这种 purity。言外之意是这不仅仅是 ecological damage,更是对 humanity's final pristine refuge 的 desecration。对文章主旨的作用是从一开始就 establish 一个 moral framework:这不是普通的 fishing regulation issue,而是关于 preserving something irreplaceable 的 urgent crisis。这为后续 Greenpeace 的 campaign 和 sanctuary proposals 提供了 ethical justification。

  • 捕捞船只危险活动频发

    P2
    It also highlights incidents of fishing boats being involved in groundings, oil spills and accidents, which posed a serious threat to the Antarctic ecosystem

    模糊限制语 incidents cases instances occurrences events situations reports of

    Incidents 这个词的言外之意是这些 accidents 不是 rare exceptions,而是 krill fishing industry 的 operational pattern 中的 recurring problems。通过列举 groundings、oil spills、accidents,文章在暗示 industry's safety standards 是 inadequate 的,而且这些 incidents 的 frequency 足以构成对整个 Antarctic ecosystem 的 serious threat。对主旨的作用是为 Greenpeace 的 immediate halt 要求提供 concrete evidence,说明这不仅是 ecological impact 的 theoretical concern,而是有 documented safety failures 支撑的 urgent issue。

  • 国际保护压力正在升级

    P3
    The report, published on Tuesday, comes amid growing concern about the impact of fishing and climate change on the Antarctic

    情态词 amid growing concern growing concern mounting pressure increasing alarm rising awareness escalating worries heightened attention

    Amid growing concern 的言外之意是国际社会对南极问题的 attention 已经达到一个 critical mass,各方的 pressure 正在 converge,这为 Greenpeace 的 report 和 campaign 创造了 favorable political climate。Growing 暗示这不是 isolated voices,而是 momentum building 的过程,意味着 policy changes 变得 politically feasible。对主旨的作用是 contextualize Greenpeace 的 call for action,说明它不是 lone environmental group 的 radical demand,而是 responding to 一个 broader international movement。这增强了 sanctuary proposals 的 legitimacy 和 urgency。

  • 环保组织质疑磷虾产业责任

    P4
    If the krill industry wants to show it's a responsible player, then it should be voluntarily getting out of any area which is being proposed as an ocean sanctuary

    条件句 If if should ought to would be expected to claims to be purports to

    这个 if 条件句的言外之意非常明确:Greenpeace 在 questioning krill industry 的 self-proclaimed responsible image。言外之意是目前 industry 并没有 demonstrate responsibility,因为它们还在 proposed sanctuary areas 继续 operating。Voluntarily getting out 这个 phrase 更进一步暗示 industry 缺乏 proactive environmental commitment。对主旨的作用是直接 challenge industry's credibility,把 burden of proof 转移到 industry 身上:如果你们 claim 自己 responsible,就用 actions 来 prove it。这为 calling for immediate halt 提供了 moral pressure,并且 frame 了 debate:不是 environmentalists 在 attacking industry,而是 industry 需要 prove 自己的 claims。

  • 保护区提案进展缓慢

    P6
    although a decision on the peninsula sanctuary is not expected until later

    时间推延表达 not expected until later delayed postponed no timeline remains uncertain still under consideration pending

    Not expected until later 的言外之意是尽管 Antarctic ecosystem 面临 immediate threats(前文已建立),但 political decision-making 的 pace 是 inadequate 的。这个 vague timeline 暗示 bureaucratic process 和 ecological urgency 之间存在 mismatch。Although 这个 conjunction 表面上是 neutral reporting,但实际在 highlighting 一个 disappointing reality:即使有 proposals,实际 protection 还很 distant。对主旨的作用是 underscore Greenpeace's call for immediate halt 的 reasonableness,因为如果等 formal sanctuary decisions,可能 too late。这也 subtle 地 criticize decision-making bodies 的 slow response,为 voluntary industry action 的 appeal 提供更强 justification。

  • 产业方辩护缺乏实质承诺

    P7
    He said although more fishing was taking place nearer penguin colonies it was often happening later in the season when these colonies were empty

    让步类 although while even though despite granted admittedly it is true that

    Although 引导的这个 concession 的言外之意是 CCAMLR 的 representative 在 acknowledging Greenpeace's data is accurate(more fishing near penguin colonies),但试图通过 timing argument 来 minimize ecological impact。言外之意更深层是:如果 timing 就能 resolve concerns,为什么还需要 qualify 这么多?这个 defensive response 实际上 validates Greenpeace 的 core concern。对主旨的作用是 show industry's response 是 inadequate 的,只提供 technical justifications 而没有 address fundamental issue:即使 colonies are empty,fishing in their vicinity 仍然 impacts marine ecosystem。这种 weak defense 反而 strengthens Greenpeace's case for more stringent protections。

  • 产业声明强调对话但回避承诺

    P8
    We are not the ones to decide on the establishment of marine protected areas, but we hope to contribute positively with our knowledge and experience

    情态词 hope to aim to seek to try to endeavor to aspire to intend to

    Hope to contribute positively 配合前面的 we are not the ones to decide,言外之意是 industry 在 strategically distancing itself from actual decision-making responsibility,同时 maintaining appearance of cooperation。这是 典型的 corporate speak:表达 willingness to dialogue 但不 commit to specific actions 或 outcomes。对主旨的作用是 expose industry's reluctance to take meaningful action,与 Greenpeace 的 call for immediate voluntary withdrawal 形成鲜明对比。这种 non-committal response 实际上 reinforces article's implicit argument:不能 rely on industry self-regulation,需要 formal sanctuary protections 和 external pressure 才能 ensure Antarctic ecosystem's preservation。最后这段 industry statement 反而成为 Greenpeace position 的 supporting evidence。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Concerned and Supportive of Conservation)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇定调 P1

    新闻报道的 opening paragraph 往往会 reveal 揭示作者的 stance 立场。这篇文章开篇就用 'threatening' 这个负面词汇来描述 industrial fishing 工业捕捞,说明作者对 krill fishing 持 negative view 负面看法,同时用 'unspoilt waters' 和 'last great wildernesses' 这样的表达来 emphasize 强调南极的 precious nature 珍贵性质,暗示作者 values conservation 重视保护。

  2. 信源比重分析 P2 P4 P7 P8

    这篇报道中,作者 extensively cite 大量引用 Greenpeace 的 findings 发现和 spokesperson 发言人的话,给予 conservation advocates 保护倡导者充分的 voice 发声机会。虽然文章也 include 包含了 CCAMLR 和 krill industry 的 response 回应,但这些 opposing views 对立观点的 篇幅 space 明显更少,且被 positioned 定位在文章的 latter part 后半部分。这种 asymmetric coverage 不对称报道显示作者 favor 偏向 conservation side 保护一方。

  3. 叙事框架识别 P3 P5

    文章明确 construct 构建了一个 narrative arc 叙事弧线:先 present the problem 呈现问题(krill fishing 威胁 Antarctic ecosystem 南极生态系统),再 introduce the solution 引入解决方案(create ocean sanctuaries 建立海洋保护区)。作者用 'growing concern' 和 'global campaign has been launched' 这样的表达来 frame 框定保护行动为 正当且 urgent 紧迫的 response 回应。这种 narrative structure 叙事结构本身就 implies 暗示作者 endorse 认可保护方案。

  4. 综合来看,这篇报道通过 negative framing 负面框定 krill fishing(threatening, incidents, serious threat),positive framing 正面框定 conservation efforts(protection, sanctuary, sustainable),dominant quotation 主导引用 from Greenpeace,以及 problem-solution narrative 问题-解决叙事,清晰地 demonstrate 展示出作者对 Antarctic conservation 南极保护的 support 支持和对 current fishing practices 当前捕捞做法的 concern 担忧。虽然文章 maintain 保持了 journalistic format 新闻格式并 include 包含了 industry perspective 行业视角,但 overall slant 整体倾向明显 favor 偏向环保立场。

文中的态度信号词

  • threatening P1

    这个 verb 动词 'threatening' 具有强烈的 negative connotation 负面含义,它将 industrial fishing 工业捕捞 characterize 描述为一种 active danger 主动威胁。在新闻报道的 opening sentence 开篇句中使用这样的 loaded term 倾向性词汇,immediately signals 立即表明作者对 fishing activities 捕捞活动持 critical stance 批判立场,认为它对 Antarctic wilderness 南极荒野构成 serious threat 严重威胁。

    同类词 endangering jeopardizing imperiling menacing posing a risk to

  • unspoilt P1

    形容词 'unspoilt' 带有 idealized 理想化的 positive connotation 正面含义,它 portrays 描绘南极水域为 pure and untouched 纯净且未受触碰的状态。通过使用这个词,作者 establish 确立了一个 baseline value 基线价值——南极的 pristine nature 原始本质是 worth preserving 值得保护的。这与后面提到的 'threatening' 形成 contrast 对比,强化了 conservation message 保护讯息。

    同类词 pristine untouched virgin unblemished untarnished

  • posed a serious threat P2

    这个 phrase 短语 'posed a serious threat' 不仅包含 threat 威胁这个 negative term 负面词汇,还加上 'serious' 这个 intensifier 强化词,进一步 amplify 放大问题的 severity 严重性。作者用这个表达来 describe 描述 fishing incidents 捕捞事故对 Antarctic ecosystem 南极生态系统的影响,显示作者认为这些 activities 活动的 consequences 后果是 grave 严重的,需要 immediate attention 立即关注。

    同类词 represented a grave danger constituted a major risk created a significant hazard presented an imminent peril

  • growing concern P3

    短语 'growing concern' 传达一种 dynamic 动态的 negative trend 负面趋势,暗示问题正在 becoming more serious 变得更严重,more people 更多人开始 pay attention 关注。作者使用这个表达来 introduce 引入保护行动的 context 背景,制造一种 momentum 动势感,表明 conservation efforts 保护努力是 timely and necessary 及时且必要的 response 回应。

    同类词 increasing worry mounting anxiety rising alarm escalating unease heightened apprehension

  • should be voluntarily getting out P4

    Modal verb 情态动词 'should' 表达 obligation 义务或 recommendation 建议,Greenpeace 发言人使用这个词来 call for 呼吁 krill industry 磷虾行业采取行动。作者选择 quote 引用这个带有 prescriptive tone 规定性语气的 statement 陈述,并将它 place prominently 突出放置,说明作者 give voice to 给予发声权并可能 agree with 赞同这种 call for action 行动呼吁。

    同类词 should be getting out ought to withdraw must cease operations needs to pull out should exit

  • protecting wildlife and banning P5

    动词 'protecting' 和 'banning' 都是 action-oriented terms 行动导向词汇,且都带有 positive connotation 正面含义在 conservation context 保护语境中。作者用这些词来 describe 描述 ocean sanctuaries 海洋保护区的 purpose 目的,framing 框定保护区为 proactive measures 积极措施来 safeguard 保护野生动物。这种 framing 框定本身就 indicate 表明作者 view these actions favorably 积极看待这些行动。

    同类词 protecting safeguarding preserving conserving defending

  • responsible player P4

    短语 'responsible player' 是 normative language 规范性语言,它 set up 设立一个 standard 标准——负责任的行业参与者应该 behave in certain ways 以某种方式行事。Greenpeace 用这个表达来 create pressure 制造压力,作者 quoting it 引用它表明作者 give credence to 相信这种 framing 框架,即 krill industry 磷虾行业有 moral obligation 道德义务来支持保护。

    同类词 accountable actor ethical operator conscientious entity socially responsible company

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇新闻报道

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇新闻报道?

  1. 首段直报事件 P1

    第1段 直接呈现了 a new report 的 finding,用 according to 引出信息来源,这是典型的 news lead structure。议论文会先提出 thesis statement,说明文会先定义 topic,但新闻报道会直接 report the news。

  2. 多方引述并存 P2 P4 P7 P8

    第2段 引用了 Greenpeace study 的 findings,第4段 直接 quote 了 Frida Bengtsson 的 statement,第7段-8 又引用了 Keith Reid 的 perspective。这种 multi-source structure 是新闻报道的 hallmark,议论文主要表达 author's viewpoint,说明文主要 explain facts,都不会这样频繁地 attribute information to external sources。

  3. 文章用 the study analysed、the report highlights、the organisation sought 这类 neutral verbs 来 describe actions,而不是用 alarmingly、shockingly 这类 loaded adjectives。即使在 describing environmental threats,语言也保持 factual,比如 threatening the future 是基于 report findings 而非 author's personal alarm。议论文会用 persuasive language,说明文会用 explanatory language,但新闻报道严格 maintain descriptive neutrality。

  4. 时间锚点明确 P3 P5 P6

    第3段 明确说 the report published on Tuesday,第5段 提到 one was created in 2016,第6段 说 decision 将在 October 做出。这些 specific time references 是 news reporting 的 key feature,因为 news 关注 timeliness。议论文的 time references 通常是 general historical context,说明文基本不强调 time,但新闻必须 anchor events in time。

  5. 四个判断维度相互 reinforce:event focus 决定了需要 source attribution,objectivity requirement 决定了 neutral language,news value 决定了 time sensitivity。这篇文章不是在 argue for a position(议论文),也不是在 explain how something works(说明文),而是在 report what happened and what different parties say about it,这正是 news reporting 的 core function。

哪些词暴露了新闻报道体裁?

  • according to a new report P1 新闻来源与引用词 The study by Greenpeace The report, published on Tuesday Frida Bengtsson from Greenpeace's Protect the Antarctic campaign said Keith Reid, a science manager at CCAMLR, said
  • published on Tuesday P3 即时性时间与地点词 in October in 2016
  • A global campaign has been launched P3 核心事实概括词 has been launched to turn One was created in the Ross Sea in 2016 another reserve is being proposed a third sanctuary is under consideration
  • comes amid growing concern P3 即时性时间与地点词 at a conference in Australia in October in the region in the unspoilt waters around Antarctica in the immediate vicinity of penguin colonies
  • said: P4 新闻来源与引用词 said that he added
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

3 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 的常见问题

2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
南极洲附近的工业磷虾捕捞活动威胁生态系统,渔船在企鹅栖息地和鲸鱼觅食区附近作业。绿色和平组织报告了渔船事故和石油泄漏事件,呼吁在拟建海洋保护区立即停止捕捞,而南极海洋生物资源养护委员会寻求在保护与可持续捕捞之间取得平衡。(英文表述:Industrial krill fishing near Antarctica threatens the ecosystem by operating close to penguin colonies and whale-feeding grounds. Greenpeace reports accidents and oil spills from fishing vessels, urging immediate halt in proposed ocean sanctuary areas while CCAMLR seeks balance between conservation and sustainable fishing.)
2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为新闻报道,作者立场是积极支持(Concerned and Supportive of Conservation)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 449 词、8 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 8 段按新闻报道骨架分为 8 个意群:第1段——导语:磷虾捕捞威胁南极生态;第2段——研究证据:捕捞船只活动与事故;第3段——背景拓展:保护运动与呼吁;第4段——观点引述:环保组织诉求;第5段——方案详述:三大海洋保护区;第6段——机构介绍:决策主体与时间线;第7段——对立观点:管理机构立场(第一部分);第8段——对立观点:管理机构立场(第二部分)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Concerned and Supportive of Conservation)。判断路径:开篇定调 → 信源比重分析 → 叙事框架识别 → 全文态度综合;文中的态度信号词包括 threatening(第1段)、unspoilt(第1段)、posed a serious threat(第2段)、growing concern(第3段)、should be voluntarily getting out(第4段)、protecting wildlife and banning(第5段)、responsible player(第4段)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part III Section C (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:unspoilt(未受破坏的、原始的、保持自然状态的)、vicinity(邻近地区、周边区域、附近范围)、grounding(搁浅、触礁)、tract(大片土地、大片区域、地带)、thriving(繁荣的、兴旺的、茁壮成长的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: