2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section A (2) · 听力

2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2)

对话 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇对话全文 298 词、8 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语六级文章中占 39%);英文原文之外,本篇已有的 6 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 的听力原文,由懒笔记按试卷原文逐段核对收录,共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

M: Do you think dreams have special meanings?

W: No, I don't think they do.

M: I don't either. But some people do. I would say people who believe that dreams have special meanings are superstitious, especially nowadays. In the past, during the times of ancient Egypt, Greece or China, people used to believe that dreams could foresee the future. But today, with all the scientific knowledge that we have, I think it's much harder to believe in these sorts of things.

W: My grandmother is superstitious, and she thinks dreams can predict the future. Once she dreamed that the flight she was due to take the following day crashed. Can you guess what she did? She didn't take that flight. She didn't even bother to go to the airport the following day. Instead, she took the same flight but a week later. And everything was fine, of course. No plane ever crashed.

M: How funny! Did you know that flying is actually safer than any other mode of transport? It's been statistically proven. People can be so irrational sometimes.

W: Yes, absolutely. But even if we think they are ridiculous, emotions can be just as powerful as rational thinking.

M: Exactly. People do all sorts of crazy things because of their irrational feelings. But in fact, some psychologists believe that our dreams are the result of our emotions and memories from that day. I think it was Sigmund Freud who said that children's dreams were usually simple representations of their wishes, things they wished would happen. But in adults, dreams are much more complicated reflections of their more sophisticated sentiments.

W: Isn't it interesting how psychologists try to understand using the scientific method something as bizarre as dreams? Psychology is like the rational study of irrational feelings.

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的对话骨架

按对话 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引出话题

    男士通过提问 special meanings 来 initiate 整个 conversation,女士简洁地表达 negative opinion,这是典型的 topic introduction,用 question-answer pattern 快速建立 discussion focus。

    这个 opening exchange 直接点明 central topic 即 dreams 是否有 special meanings,为后续 exploration 设定 scope,是 dialogue structure 中的 topic establishment phase。

    提出核心议题
  2. 共识与理性分析

    男士表达 agreement 后进入 extended elaboration,从 historical perspective 出发对比 ancient beliefs 和 modern scientific knowledge,通过 temporal contrast 来 rationalize 他们的 shared view,这是 argumentative expansion。

    这段 extended turn 提供 rational foundation 来 support 前面的 negative stance,通过 historical evolution 和 scientific progress 这两个 dimensions 来 legitimize 他们的 position,是 dialogue 中的 justification phase。

    解释不信原因
  3. 具体案例佐证

    女士通过 personal anecdote 即 grandmother 的 dream experience 来 exemplify superstitious beliefs,用 narrative structure 中的 setup-action-result pattern 让 abstract concept 变得 concrete,这是 illustrative discourse move。

    这个 personal story 给 superstitious beliefs 提供 concrete illustration,让 discussion 从 theoretical level 转向 experiential level,是 dialogue 中常见的 example-introduction strategy 来 enrich 和 substantiate previous claims。

    举例说明迷信
  4. 理性评价与深化

    男士用 statistical fact 来 comment on 故事的 irrationality,女士 acknowledge 这种 ridiculous 的同时提出 key insight 即 emotions 和 rational thinking 同样 powerful。这个 exchange 实现 evaluation 和 conceptual deepening。

    这组 turns 把 discussion 推向更 abstract level,从 judging superstition 转向 exploring 背后的 emotion-reason tension,是 dialogue 中的 thematic deepening,为 final段的 psychological analysis 铺路。

    对比理性情感
  5. 心理学视角升华

    男士 elaborate on irrational behavior 并引入 psychological explanation 即 Freud 的 theory 关于 dreams 和 emotions/memories 的关系,女士 meta-comment on psychology 本身作为 rational study of irrational,完成 theoretical synthesis。

    这个 closing exchange 把整个 discussion 提升到 disciplinary level,用 psychological framework 来 integrate 前面关于 emotions、rationality、dreams 的各个 threads,是 dialogue 的 theoretical closure,实现 conceptual synthesis。

    心理学解释梦
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首句定主题 P1

    在对话类 article 中,opening question 通常是 topic launcher,它 sets the agenda for the entire conversation。第一句 'Do you think dreams have special meanings?' 直接点明了整个 dialogue 要讨论的 central topic。

  2. 立场标记词 P2 P3

    对话的 fundamental structure 往往在前几轮 exchange 中就确立了 stance。第2段 和 第3段 中的 'No, I don't think they do' 和 'I don't either' 迅速建立了 shared position,这是理解 main idea 的关键 building block。

  3. 例证层识别 P4 P5

    在确立了 basic stance 之后,speakers 会提供 evidence and illustrations。第4段 的 grandmother's story 和 第5段 的 statistical facts 都是用来 support their shared rejection of superstitious beliefs,这些 examples deepen 我们对 main idea 的理解。

  4. 主题深化路径 P6 P7 P8

    对话往往会 evolve from specific issue to general principle。第6段 到 第8段 中,discussion 从 dreams 这个 specific case 扩展到 emotions vs. rationality 这个 broader theme,以及 psychology 作为 scientific study of irrational feelings 的本质。这个 expansion 丰富了 main idea 的层次。

  5. 完整的 main idea 不是单一的 sentence,而是 multi-layered synthesis。本文的 main idea 包含:dreams 这个 topic,双方 reject predictive power 的 shared position,'superstitious vs. scientific' 的 key contrast,以及 'emotions and psychology' 作为 broader exploration。

主旨信号词 discuss P1 don't think P2 superstitious P3 but P3 emotions P6 psychology P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

一男一女讨论梦境是否具有特殊含义。他们一致认为梦境无法预测未来,尽管有些人持有迷信观念。他们探讨了梦境与情感和心理学的关系,对比了理性科学思维与非理性情感和信念。
A man and woman discuss whether dreams have special meanings. They agree dreams don't predict the future, despite some people's superstitious beliefs. They explore how dreams relate to emotions and psychology, contrasting rational scientific thinking with irrational feelings and beliefs.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • superstitious 迷信的

    现在我们把三条 clues 串联起来。首先从 word form 看,-ous ending 告诉我们这是一个 descriptive adjective。然后从 context 看,男士把 believing dreams have special meanings 的 people 称为 superstitious,并强调在 scientific knowledge 丰富的 today,很难再 believe 这些 things。接着 grandmother 的 story 提供了 concrete example:因为 dream 改 flight,这种 behavior 被认为是 superstitious 且 irrational。所有 evidence 指向同一个 meaning:superstitious 描述的是缺乏 scientific basis、过度相信 supernatural 或 mystical things 的 characteristic。

    词缀+定义+实例三角验证法
  • foresee 预见

    让我们 synthesize 这些 clues。Morphologically,fore- (before) + see (perceive) 给出 literal sense 'see beforehand'。Contextually,foresee 的 object 是 'the future',只有 prediction 才能 logically apply to future。Grandmother's story 提供了 behavioral evidence,她试图通过 dream 来 foresee potential crash。所有 angles 都指向一个 coherent meaning:在某事 happen 之前就 know 或 predict 它。

    词素拆解+宾语限定+平行验证
  • irrational 不理性的

    现在 integrate 所有 evidence。Morphologically,ir- prefix 明确表示 negation,所以 irrational = not rational。从 context clues 看,rational thinking 被 contrasted with emotions and feelings,rational study 被 contrasted with irrational feelings,rational 与 statistical proof 相关而 irrational 与 dream-based decisions and crazy things 相关。所有这些 oppositions 揭示 rational 关于 logic 和 reason,而 irrational 是其 opposite:缺乏 logic,基于 emotion 而非 reason。

    否定词缀+语境对比推词根
  • representation 表现形式

    让我们 combine 这些 insights。Morphologically,represent + -ation 表示 representing 的 action 或 result。从 appositive structure 看,'representations of wishes' 被 explained as 'things they wished would happen',说明 representation 是 wishes 的某种 manifestation in dreams。从 parallel with 'reflections' 看,两者都描述 internal states 如何在 dreams 中 appear。综合起来,representation 是指某种 internal content (wish, idea) 在另一种 form (dream) 中的 expression 或 manifestation。

    词根识别+同位解释+平行类比
  • sentiment 情感

    现在 synthesize all clues。从 word family 看,sentiment 与 sentimental 相关,后者 relates to emotions。从 broader context 看,discussion 是关于 emotions and memories,sentiments 在这个 framework 中被讨论。从 specific contrast 看,sentiments 与 wishes 平行但 more sophisticated,both are internal states reflected in dreams。所有 evidence converges on sentiment 作为某种 feeling 或 emotional state,但比 simple wish 更 complex and refined。

    语义域定位+内部对比+修饰语细化
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

4 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 反问

    P4

    女士在 第4段 使用了 rhetorical question "Can you guess what she did?" 这个反问句并不是真的在 seeking an answer,而是通过 question form 来 create suspense,引导听众去 anticipate 接下来的 surprising behavior。这个 rhetorical device 让她奶奶的 irrational action 显得更加 dramatic,强化了文章关于 superstitious beliefs 和 irrational feelings 的 central theme。通过这个 engaging question,女士成功地 draw attention 到她想要 illustrate 的 point:即使是 educated people 身边也有人会因为 dreams 而做出 illogical decisions。

    信号词 Can you guess Do you know what Can you imagine Guess what You know what happened What do you think Can you believe

    仿写: 当你想要在 dialogue 中 introduce 一个 surprising fact 或 unexpected behavior 时,可以先用 rhetorical question 来 set up suspense。建议的 approach 是:先 present 一个 scenario,然后用 "Can you guess...?" 或 "Do you know what...?" 这样的 question form 来 pause,最后 reveal the surprising outcome。仿写模版:"My [relation] once [situation]. Can you guess what [subject] did? [Subject] [unexpected action]. And [result]。" 例如:"My colleague once dreamed about winning the lottery. Can you guess what he did? He actually quit his job. And of course, he never won anything."

  • 语气词

    P5 P6 P7 P8

    在 第5段 中男士使用了 "How funny!" 这个 exclamatory expression,以及在 第8段 女士使用了 "Isn't it interesting..." 这个 exclamatory question。这些 modal particles 和 exclamations 在 dialogue 中 serve to express emotional reactions 和 subjective attitudes。"How funny!" 表达了 speaker 对奶奶 irrational behavior 的 amusement 和 mild criticism,而 "Isn't it interesting" 则 convey 女士对 psychology 这个 field 的 fascination。这些 expressions 让 conversation 更加 natural 和 emotionally engaging,同时也 reinforce 文章关于 rational versus irrational thinking 的 thematic contrast。

    信号词 How What Isn't it So Such Really Absolutely Exactly

    仿写: 当你想要在 dialogue 中 express your emotional reaction 到某个 idea 或 behavior 时,使用 exclamatory expressions 可以 make your response more vivid。建议的 strategy 是:在 respond to 他人的 statement 时,先用一个 brief exclamation 来 show your immediate reaction,然后 follow up with 更 detailed explanation。仿写模版:"How [adjective]! [Supporting statement]" 或 "Isn't it [adjective] how/that [observation]?" 例如:"How absurd! People sometimes believe things without any evidence." 或 "Isn't it fascinating how the brain works during sleep?"

  • 重复

    P1 P3 P5 P6 P7 P8

    在整个 dialogue 中,"irrational" 这个 keyword 和其 related concepts("superstitious"、"ridiculous"、"crazy")被 repeatedly used。特别是在 第5段 "People can be so irrational",第6段 "irrational feelings",第7段 "irrational feelings" 再次出现,这种 lexical repetition 形成了 thematic coherence。这个 repetitive pattern 不断 reinforce 文章的 central argument:人类行为经常受到 non-rational factors 的 influence。通过这种 strategic repetition,speakers 在 conversation 中 build momentum,让 listener 对这个 concept 产生 stronger impression,最终 leading to 女士在 第8段 的 concluding observation about psychology being "the rational study of irrational feelings"。

    信号词 irrational superstitious ridiculous crazy dreams believe rational emotions feelings

    仿写: 当你想要在 extended dialogue 中 develop 一个 central theme 时,可以 strategically repeat key terms 和 related concepts throughout the conversation。建议的 approach 是:第一次 introduce the term 时 provide clear definition 或 example,然后在 subsequent turns 中 revisit the concept from different angles,最后在 conclusion 时 bring the term back 来 create closure。仿写模版可以是:[Speaker A introduces concept] → [Speaker B provides example using the term] → [Speaker A expands using related terms] → [Speaker B synthesizes using the original term]。例如:"I think people are often biased. / My uncle is quite biased against new technology. / Yes, and such biased thinking prevents progress. / That's why recognizing our biases is so important."

  • 省略

    P2 P3

    在 第2段 中,女士的 response "No, I don't think they do." 是一个 classic example of ellipsis in dialogue。完整的 sentence 应该是 "No, I don't think dreams have special meanings.",但她 omitted the repeated information 因为 context 已经 made it clear。类似的 elliptical structure 也出现在 第3段 "I don't either." where the man omits "think dreams have special meanings." 这种 linguistic economy 是 natural conversation 的 hallmark,它 makes dialogue flow smoothly,avoids redundancy,并且 reflects how people actually speak。这些 elliptical responses also demonstrate agreement 和 conversational cooperation between the two speakers,contributing to the dialogue's natural rhythm 和 cohesiveness。

    信号词 too either neither so nor as well also

    仿写: 当你在 dialogue 中 respond to a question 或 agree with a statement 时,可以使用 ellipsis 来 make your response more natural 和 conversational。Strategy 是:identify 哪些 information 已经在 previous turn 中 established,然后在你的 response 中 retain only the new or contrasting element。仿写模版:"[Yes/No], [Subject] + [auxiliary verb] + [too/either/as well]" 或 "[Subject] + [auxiliary verb] + [too/either]"。例如:A: "Do you enjoy classical music?" B: "Yes, I do." (ellipsis of "enjoy classical music") 或 A: "I haven't seen that movie." B: "I haven't either." (ellipsis of "seen that movie")。注意在 negative agreement 时用 "either",positive agreement 用 "too"。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

7 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 通过否定他人观点强化自己立场

    P3
    I would say people who believe that dreams have special meanings are superstitious, especially nowadays.

    贬义标签词 superstitious irrational ridiculous naive foolish absurd nonsense

    男士使用 'superstitious' 这个带有 negative connotation 的词,言外之意是他认为相信 dreams have special meanings 是一种 backward 和 unscientific 的 belief。通过 'especially nowadays' 的 temporal contrast,他 implies 在现代社会这种 belief 更加 unjustifiable。这个 implication 为整个 conversation 的 tone 定调,establishing 了 rational scientific perspective 作为对话的 dominant viewpoint,为后续 discussion 奠定了 skeptical attitude towards dream interpretation。

  • 用反问句表达确定的否定判断

    P4
    Can you guess what she did? She didn't take that flight.

    反问句 Can you guess what she did? Can you guess Do you know what happened What do you think she did Can you believe Guess what You know what happened next

    女士通过 rhetorical question 'Can you guess what she did?' 来 build up tension,言外之意是她 grandmother 的 action 会是 irrational 和 extreme 的。这个 setup 让 listener 产生 anticipation,然后当揭示 grandmother 因为梦境而 cancelled flight 时,这种 irrationality 显得更加 striking。这个 implication 通过 narrative technique 强化了对话的 main argument about superstition versus rationality,用 personal anecdote 来 illustrate 非理性 belief 如何 influence real-life decisions,supporting 对话关于 dreams don't predict future 的 central thesis。

  • 通过陈述事实暗示行为的荒谬性

    P4
    And everything was fine, of course. No plane ever crashed.

    对比类 No plane ever crashed but nothing happened and everything was fine of course naturally as expected predictably

    女士通过 stating the obvious fact 'No plane ever crashed' 配合 'of course' 这个 marker,言外之意是她 grandmother 的 worry 完全是 groundless 和 unnecessary 的。这个 simple statement 通过 presenting reality 来 highlight 梦境预测的 unreliability。这种 implication reinforces 对话的 skeptical stance towards dream interpretation,用 empirical evidence 来 debunk superstitious beliefs,同时也为后续 discussion about flying safety 和 irrational behavior 做了 transition,contributing to 对话关于 rationality versus emotions 的 overarching theme。

  • 用统计事实反驳非理性恐惧

    P5
    Did you know that flying is actually safer than any other mode of transport? It's been statistically proven.

    权威支持类 It's been statistically proven statistically proven scientifically confirmed research shows studies indicate data reveals evidence suggests

    男士通过 citing statistical proof about flight safety,言外之意是 grandmother's fear 和 dream-based decision 不仅 irrational,而且 contradicts objective reality。'Did you know' 这个 question form 加上 'actually' 这个 contrast marker,进一步 emphasizes 事实与 perception 的 gap。这个 implication 通过 scientific authority 强化了对话的 rational perspective,demonstrating 了 evidence-based thinking 应该 override emotional responses,directly supporting 对话的 main argument about rationality versus superstition,并为后续 discussion about irrational feelings 提供了 concrete grounding。

  • 通过让步承认情感的影响力

    P6
    But even if we think they are ridiculous, emotions can be just as powerful as rational thinking.

    让步类 But even if even if although though despite while granted that

    女士使用 'But even if we think they are ridiculous' 这个 concessive structure,言外之意是虽然她同意这些 beliefs 是 irrational,但她 recognizes emotions 的 undeniable power in shaping behavior。这个 'just as powerful' 的 comparison 实际上 challenges 了之前 conversation 中过度 emphasizing rationality 的 tendency。这个 implication introduces complexity to 对话,acknowledging that human behavior 不能 purely 用 rationality 来 explain,为后续 discussion about psychology 和 Freud's theories 做了 important pivot,enriching 对话的 nuance about emotions versus rationality 的 relationship。

  • 通过引用权威理论深化讨论

    P7
    I think it was Sigmund Freud who said that children's dreams were usually simple representations of their wishes

    权威引用类 I think it was Sigmund Freud who said I think it was...who said According to As...put it ...once said In the words of ...argued that

    男士通过 citing Freud's theory,言外之意是 dreams 虽然不能 predict future,但它们 have meaningful psychological significance as reflections of emotions。这个 reference 实际上 reconciles 了之前的 contradiction - dreams 既不是 supernatural predictions,也不是 meaningless random events,而是 psychological phenomena 值得 scientific study。这个 implication enriches 对话的 main thesis by adding nuance: dismissing superstition 不等于 dismissing dreams' significance entirely,supporting 对话关于 rational study of seemingly irrational phenomena 的 deeper theme。

  • 用悖论式表达揭示学科本质

    P8
    Psychology is like the rational study of irrational feelings.

    悖论类 Psychology is like the rational study of irrational feelings is like the...of... paradoxically ironically strangely enough curiously the contradiction is

    女士通过这个 paradoxical statement,言外之意是整个 conversation 的 central tension - rationality 和 irrationality 之间的关系 - 实际上 can be reconciled through psychology 这门学科。她 implies that attempting to scientifically understand emotions 和 dreams 并非 self-contradictory,而是 legitimate endeavor。这个 implication provides elegant closure to 对话,reconciling 之前 seemingly opposed viewpoints (scientific skepticism vs. emotional power),demonstrating 对话的 ultimate message: rationality 和 emotions 不是 mutually exclusive,而是可以通过 psychological study 来 integrated and understood。

SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

10 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 的常见问题

2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
一男一女讨论梦境是否具有特殊含义。他们一致认为梦境无法预测未来,尽管有些人持有迷信观念。他们探讨了梦境与情感和心理学的关系,对比了理性科学思维与非理性情感和信念。(英文表述:A man and woman discuss whether dreams have special meanings. They agree dreams don't predict the future, despite some people's superstitious beliefs. They explore how dreams relate to emotions and psychology, contrasting rational scientific thinking with irrational feelings and beliefs.)
2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为对话。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 298 词、8 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 233 篇(占 39%)。
2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 8 段按对话骨架分为 5 个意群:第1段、第2段——引出话题;第3段——共识与理性分析;第4段——具体案例佐证;第5段、第6段——理性评价与深化;第7段、第8段——心理学视角升华。
2020年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section A (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:superstitious(迷信的)、foresee(预见)、irrational(不理性的)、representation(表现形式)、sentiment(情感),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: