2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (2) Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss
CET-6 · 来自 2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 · Part III Section C (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss

2020年12月英语六级真题第3套文章逐层精读

The Atlantic《大西洋月刊》2019.03.08文章Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss(大猩猩正在遭受悲剧性的损失)。

本页是 2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 444 词、8 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「消极批判」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss

Imagine that an alien species landed on Earth and, through their mere presence, those aliens caused our art to vanish, our music to homogenize, and our technological know-how to disappear. That is effectively what humans have been doing to our closest relatives—chimps(大猩猩).

Back in 1999, a team of scientists led by Andrew Whiten showed that chimps from different parts of Africa behave very differently from one another. Some groups would get each other's attention by rapping branches with their knuckles(指关节), while others did it by loudly ripping leaves with their teeth. The team identified 39 of these traditions that are practiced by some communities but not others—a pattern that, at the time, hadn't been seen in any animal except humans. It was evidence, the team said, that chimps have their own cultures.

It took a long time to convince skeptics that such cultures exist, but now we have plenty of examples of animals learning local traditions from one another.

But just when many scientists have come to accept the existence of animal cultures, many of those cultures might vanish. Ammie Kalan and her colleagues have shown, through years of intensive fieldwork, that the very presence of humans has eroded the diversity of chimp behavior. Where we flourish, their cultures wither. It is a bitterly ironic thing to learn on the 20th anniversary of Whiten's classic study.

"It's amazing to think that just 60 years ago, we knew next to nothing of the behavior of our sister species in the wild," Whiten says. "But now, just as we are truly getting to know our primate(灵长类) cousins, the actions of humans are closing the window on all we have discovered."

"Sometimes in the rush to conserve the species, I think we forget about the individuals," says Cat Hobaiter, a professor at the University of St. Andrews. "Each population, each community, even each generation of chimps is unique. An event might only have a small impact on the total population of chimps, but it may wipe out an entire community—an entire culture. No matter what we do to restore habitat or support population growth, we may never be able to restore that culture."

No one knows whether the destruction of chimp culture is getting worse. Few places have tracked chimp behavior over long periods, and those that have are also more likely to have protected their animals from human influence.

Obviously, conservationists need to think about saving species in a completely new way—by preserving animal traditions as well as bodies and genes. "Instead of focusing only on the conservation of genetically based entities like species, we now need to also consider culturally based entities," says Andrew Whiten.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

8 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    A Striking Analogy for Cultural Loss

    Humans are destroying chimpanzee culture in a way comparable to an alien-caused loss of human culture.

    本段承担 introduction 的功能,以 vivid analogy 把“黑猩猩行为减少”提升为“文化被毁灭”的伦理问题,为全文关于 conservation 应保护文化的论证奠定了价值基础。

    抓住类比落点
  2. P2

    Scientific Evidence of Chimpanzee Culture

    Whiten's 1999 study showed that regional chimpanzee traditions constitute evidence of culture.

    本段为全文提供 foundational evidence:只有先证明 chimpanzees 具有 culture,后文关于这种文化正在消失、且应被保护的论证才具有成立的前提。

    由例证锁定结论
  3. P3

    The Acceptance of Animal Culture

    Animal cultures, once doubted, are now supported by abundant evidence.

    本段起到 bridge 的作用:它确认“动物有文化”已不再是边缘观点,因此下文转而讨论更紧迫的 issue——这些已获承认的文化正在消失。

    对比昔日与如今
  4. P4

    Human Pressure Erodes Chimpanzee Cultures

    Human presence is causing chimpanzee cultural diversity to disappear.

    这是全文的 key claim 段,它从“黑猩猩拥有文化”推进到“人类正在毁掉这种文化”,直接呼应并具体化文章主旨中的 destroying chimpanzee cultures。

    锁定人因猴果
  5. P5

    A Closing Window of Knowledge

    Human actions are ending the opportunity to understand chimpanzees just as scientific knowledge is growing.

    本段通过权威学者 Whiten 的声音强化紧迫感,补充说明文化消失不仅伤害 black chimpanzees,也使人类失去理解近亲物种的宝贵机会。

    解读窗口隐喻
  6. P6

    The Irreplaceability of Local Chimpanzee Cultures

    Conservation must protect unique chimpanzee communities because lost cultures cannot be restored.

    本段深化全文论证:它解释了为何只保护 species numbers 远远不够,并为最后一段提出 culturally based entities 的保护理念提供了最有力的理由。

    突出文化不可复原
  7. P7

    Uncertain Evidence of Cultural Decline

    The worsening of chimpanzee cultural loss is difficult to assess because long-term evidence is scarce and biased.

    本段增加了论证的 academic caution,表明作者没有夸大数据所能证明的范围;同时,监测缺口本身也暗示 conservationists 更需要重视并记录 chimp traditions。

    辨明证据盲区
  8. P8

    Redefining Conservation to Include Culture

    Conservation should protect culturally based animal traditions as well as species, bodies, and genes.

    本段是全文的 conclusion 和 final appeal,直接回应文章主旨:鉴于 human presence 会毁灭且无法恢复 chimp cultures,conservation 必须从单一的基因与物种保护,升级为文化与生物层面的双重保护。

    从保物种到保文化
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

8 道逐段细节自检题

针对2020年12月英语六级真题第3套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 alien species comparison

    What does the comparison with an alien species primarily illustrate?

    • A Alien visitors would be more dangerous to human technology than to human art.
    • B Chimpanzees have copied human music and artistic practices.
    • C Human activity can destroy chimp cultural diversity in a way comparable to the loss of human cultural achievements.
    • D Human cultural achievements are naturally becoming more homogeneous.
    • E The disappearance of chimpanzees would inevitably erase all human knowledge.
    • F Scientists have proved that aliens once influenced chimpanzee behavior.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项同时保留了 humans 的施加者身份、chimps 的受影响对象,以及 art、music、technological know-how 所共同指向的 cultural diversity。comparable to 并未把类比误当成字面事实,而是准确呈现作者的 rhetorical purpose。障碍在于原文没有直接写 destroy chimp cultural diversity,而是通过 vanish、homogenize、disappear 三个动词制造整体性损失;正确项完成了合理概括,没有扩大到物种灭绝。

    双角色对位 时间极紧时,直接把题干中的 alien species 回扫到 第1段,并跳读其后的 effectively 句。最高效的非常规做法是做“角色替换”:把 aliens 标为假设中的破坏者,把 humans 标为现实中的破坏者;把 human cultural achievements 与 chimp cultures 配对。随后只选能完整保留这两组对应关系的正确项,无须逐词翻译全部画面。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 researchers their own cultures

    What finding led the researchers to regard chimpanzees as having their own cultures?

    • A All chimp communities used knuckles to rap branches for attention.
    • B Chimpanzees learned the same set of traditions from humans across Africa.
    • C Thirty-nine individual chimpanzees displayed exceptional intelligence.
    • D Different chimp communities practiced distinct local traditions, including behaviors absent from other communities.
    • E Chimp behavior had never differed between African regions before 1999.
    • F Only humans can develop traditions that involve communication.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    它准确压缩了 39 traditions practiced by some communities but not others 的核心证据,并保留 distinct、local、absent 三个关键限制。including 表明枝条敲击、撕叶等只是 examples,而非唯一证据。障碍在于选项没有机械复述数字 39,却完整保留了“群体间非共享行为模式”这一证据逻辑。

    抓住有无对照 用 their own cultures 直接定位 第2段 的结论句,再向前只抓一个结构骨架:some communities—but not others。无需逐项记住 39 个传统或两种动作;把选项压缩成“群体间是否存在地方性差异”后,能保留该骨架的正确项即为答案。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 scientific debate change

    What change in the scientific debate is described?

    • A Scientists have become more doubtful that animal cultures exist.
    • B Scientists have stopped studying traditions among chimpanzees.
    • C Skeptics have proved that only human traditions are learned socially.
    • D Animal cultures are now considered identical across all species.
    • E Scientists have moved from skepticism about animal cultures to having abundant examples of locally learned traditions.
    • F The debate ended because no further examples could be found.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项完整对应 took a long time to convince skeptics 与 now we have plenty of examples,并将 learning local traditions from one another 保留为证据内容。moved from...to... 精确呈现 debate 的动态。障碍在于 abundant examples 是 plenty of examples 的同义替换,考生须识别同义而不能只找原词。

    态度箭头验项 直接在全文扫描成对的时间连接器,took a long time 与 but now 会把你锁到 第3段。随后把句子改写为一个箭头:skepticism → abundant examples。选项不必逐句比对;只验证其箭头方向、终点是否仍为 evidence,正确项即可确定。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Kalan human presence

    According to Kalan's fieldwork, how does human presence affect chimp behavior?

    • A It increases behavioral diversity by bringing chimp communities together.
    • B It affects only chimp genes, leaving behavior unchanged.
    • C It has made scientists more willing to deny animal cultures.
    • D It has eliminated every chimp culture throughout Africa.
    • E It has prevented fieldworkers from observing chimpanzees.
    • F It erodes the diversity of chimp behavior, causing their local cultures to wither where humans flourish.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项准确复现 erodes the diversity of chimp behavior,并以 causing 连接后一句的 cultures wither,保留了因果方向与空间对照。where humans flourish 不是泛泛的“人类不好”,而是原文强烈的 inverse relationship。障碍是 correct option 将两句信息整合,要求考生识别后句是前句的解释性重述。

    人名后截因果 以 Kalan 在 第4段 实施“人名跳读”,忽略开头的学界背景,直接截取其后的谓语宾语:has eroded + diversity of chimp behavior。再用段末 wither 验证方向。正确项是唯一同时携带 erosion 与 culture decline 的选项,其他项只要方向或对象错位即可秒排。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 Whiten closing the window

    What does Whiten mean by saying that human actions are "closing the window"?

    • A Human activity is reducing the opportunity to continue learning about chimpanzees and their behavior.
    • B Human activity is making chimpanzees easier to observe in the wild.
    • C Scientists have finished discovering everything about chimpanzee behavior.
    • D Chimpanzees are closing physical windows built by researchers.
    • E Human actions have restored knowledge that was lost sixty years ago.
    • F Researchers should focus only on technological know-how.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项把 window 还原为 opportunity,把 all we have discovered 与 getting to know 还原为 continue learning about chimpanzees and their behavior。reducing 对应 closing,既不夸张为知识已全部消失,也不把对象缩窄成某一项研究。障碍在于原文的情感强度较高,但正确项需保持原有的进行性和机会层面。

    窗口换成机会 锁定 第5段 的引号短语后,不翻译 window,先把它替换为 access/opportunity,再回看同一句中的 getting to know。用“关闭 access = 减少继续了解”这一单步语义等式筛选,正确项会立即显现;这比逐词处理整段引语更快。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 total chimp population still be serious

    Why can an event with little effect on the total chimp population still be serious?

    • A It always causes a rapid increase in the total chimp population.
    • B It may wipe out a unique chimp community and the culture that cannot simply be restored.
    • C It proves that all chimp communities are culturally identical.
    • D It makes habitat restoration unnecessary for conservationists.
    • E It guarantees that a lost culture will return with population growth.
    • F It affects only one generation and never an entire community.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项对应 wipe out an entire community—an entire culture,并结合每个 community unique 和 may never be able to restore that culture。它解释了为何总量 small 仍 serious:损失的是独特、不可替代的局部文化。障碍是题干以 total population 设入口,正确项却必须转向 community/culture;若只在总量维度找答案,就会错过论证转轴。

    总量切到社群 在 第6段 只做“单位替换”标记:total population → entire community → entire culture。题干的矛盾由单位变化解决,不需要读完所有引语。将每个选项也按其谈论的单位分类;唯一从总量正确转到独特文化损失的正确项就是答案。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 determine whether worsening

    Why is it difficult to determine whether the loss of chimp culture is worsening?

    • A Chimp culture has already disappeared from every place that was studied.
    • B Scientists have tracked too many unprotected chimp communities.
    • C Long-term behavioral records are scarce, and the recorded sites are more likely to be shielded from human influence.
    • D Human influence is too weak to affect chimp behavior anywhere.
    • E Researchers disagree about the definition of animal culture.
    • F The available records cover only genetic changes rather than behavior.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项完整覆盖 Few places have tracked chimp behavior over long periods 与 those that have are also more likely to have protected their animals from human influence。前者是 longitudinal data shortage,后者是 sample bias;两者共同使趋势判断不可靠。障碍在于 shielded 是 protected from 的同义改写,且答案没有错误地断言“趋势没有恶化”。

    双重证据缺口 由 worsening 同义回扫 第7段 的 getting worse,先读 No one knows 后面的两句,不必回到前文寻找危害机制。采用“证据审计”法:给每项贴上数据量、时间跨度、样本代表性三个标签;正确项同时命中长期记录稀少和受保护样本偏差。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 new approach conservation

    What new approach to conservation does the passage advocate?

    • A Conservation should focus exclusively on increasing chimp population size.
    • B Conservation should replace genetic protection with cultural protection.
    • C Conservationists should preserve only traditions shared by every animal species.
    • D Conservation should protect animal traditions and culturally based entities as well as bodies, genes, and species.
    • E Conservation should delay action until all animal cultures are fully documented.
    • F Conservation should treat cultural differences as irrelevant to species survival.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项整合 preserving animal traditions as well as bodies and genes 与 also consider culturally based entities,而 as well as 精确保留“扩展而非替代”的政策含义。它没有错误地否定 species conservation,只是拒绝 focusing only on genetically based entities。障碍在于正确项跨两句做同义整合,考生要读出 instead of...only...also 的包容性逻辑。

    保护对象做加法 先用 new approach 跳到 第8段,然后只圈三个逻辑词:need to、as well as、also。把它们压缩成公式“原有保护对象 + 文化对象”,不用逐个翻译长引语。凡选项出现 only 或 replace 立即排除;保留加法结构的正确项即为答案。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    外星人类比引出黑猩猩文化消失现象

    作者使用了一个striking的alien metaphor来开篇,假设外星物种降临Earth会让人类的art、music和technology消失,然后通过sharp contrast指出humans正在对chimps做同样的事情,effectively地eroding他们的cultures。这个vivid的类比immediately抓住读者attention,同时introduces本文的central issue。

    这个引言paragraph通过provocative的alien analogy来establish整篇文章的argumentative foundation。它directly presents了human presence对chimp culture的destructive impact这个core thesis,为后续的evidence presentation和analysis做好铺垫,同时用dramatic的opening吸引readers继续阅读。

    提出人类正摧毁黑猩猩文化这一核心问题
  2. 分论点 P2 P3

    科学证据:黑猩猩拥有独特文化传统

    这两个paragraphs提供了crucial的scientific background。第2段详细介绍了Whiten's landmark 1999 study,展示chimps from different parts of Africa有dramatically different behaviors,比如用knuckles敲branches或用teeth撕leaves来get attention。研究identify了39个unique traditions,proving chimps have cultures。第3段补充说明经过long-time effort,scientific community现在widely accept了animal cultures的existence,有plenty of examples支持。

    这个意群establish了essential premise:chimp cultures确实exist并且diverse。它通过cite具体scientific evidence和research findings来build credibility,为后续argue这些cultures正在disappear提供necessary foundation。如果不先prove文化的existence和diversity,就无法convincingly argue它们正在被destroyed。这是典型的logical progression in argumentation。

    确立黑猩猩文化的存在性与多样性
  3. 分论点 P4 P5

    转折论证:人类活动正摧毁黑猩猩文化

    这两个paragraphs形成powerful的ironic contrast。第4段introduce了Kalan's research findings,reveal了bitter irony:就在scientists刚刚accept animal cultures的existence时,human presence已经eroded chimp behavioral diversity。作者用'Where we flourish, their cultures wither'这个stark contrast来emphasize这个tragedy。第5段通过Whiten's quote进一步reinforce这个irony,指出just 60 years ago我们对chimps知之甚少,但now当我们truly understanding它们时,human actions却在closing the window on这些discoveries。

    这个意群present了文章的central argument和most compelling evidence。它通过cite Kalan's fieldwork直接address主旨中的'human presence is destroying chimp cultures',并且用expert testimony from Whiten来add authority。这里的ironic framing('bitterly ironic')强化了argument的emotional impact,让destruction of cultures显得更加tragic和urgent。这是全文argumentation的pivotal point。

    揭示人类正在摧毁黑猩猩文化的现实
  4. 分论点 P6 P7

    深化论证:文化损失的不可逆性与监测困境

    这两个paragraphs进一步deepen对problem的analysis。第6段通过Hobaiter's perspective强调individual communities和cultures的uniqueness,指出even small events可能wipe out entire culture,而且'we may never be able to restore that culture'即使habitat和population得到恢复。这highlight了cultural loss的irreversibility。第7段则acknowledge了monitoring的difficulty,指出few places have tracked chimp behavior over long periods,而且protected areas可能不representative。这reveal了problem assessment的inherent challenges。

    这个意群serve两个critical functions:首先reinforce主旨中'lost cultures cannot be restored'这个devastating consequence,其次acknowledge assessment的limitations来show问题可能比我们知道的更严重。它通过emphasize irreversibility来increase urgency,通过admit monitoring gaps来suggest问题的true scale可能被underestimated。这种deepening analysis让argument更加nuanced和convincing。

    强调文化损失的永久性和评估困难
  5. 结论 P8

    行动呼吁:保护策略的根本性转变

    这个concluding paragraph基于前面的evidence和analysis,提出clear的action-oriented conclusion。作者使用'Obviously'来signal这个logical inference,argue conservationists need to think about saving species in a completely new way。关键proposal是'preserving animal traditions as well as bodies and genes',并通过Whiten's quote强调需要consider'culturally based entities'而不仅是'genetically based entities'。这个conclusion directly address了主旨中的conservation approach shift。

    这个结论paragraph fulfill议论文的essential closing function:将前面的problem analysis转化为actionable recommendation。它directly respond主旨中'must shift focus from preserving only species and genes to protecting culturally-based entities'这个prescription。通过return to Whiten(呼应第2段的研究者)来create structural closure,同时用'need to'这样的modal verb强调urgency和necessity。这是从description到prescription的critical transition。

    提出保护文化实体的新策略
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段比喻定调 P1

    议论文的 first paragraph 往往通过 striking comparison 或 provocative statement 来 establish 核心矛盾。这篇文章用 alien metaphor 直接点出 humans are destroying chimp cultures,这个 analogy 非常 powerful,immediately signals 文章的 critical stance

  2. 转折段揭矛盾 P4

    第4段 的开头 'But just when...' 是典型的 argumentative pivot。这个 contrast structure (scientists accept animal cultures BUT those cultures are vanishing) 直接 reveals 文章的 tragic irony,也就是主旨的核心 tension

  3. 专家引语提方案 P5 P6 P8

    第6段 的 Hobaiter 教授提到 'we may never be able to restore that culture',第8段 的 Whiten 提出 'culturally based entities' 需要保护。这些 authoritative statements 不是随意引用的,它们 crystallize 文章的 solution-oriented aspect,即 conservation strategy must change

  4. 问题方案双主线 P1 P4 P6 P8

    这篇文章主旨包含两层:problem (human presence destroying cultures) 和 solution (conservation must shift focus)。第1段-7 establish and elaborate the problem,第8段 提出 solution。这种 structure 在议论文中非常典型,主旨必须 capture both dimensions

主旨信号词 eroded P4 bitterly ironic P4 flourish vs wither P4 never be able to restore P6 need to P8 completely new way P8

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

人类的存在正在通过侵蚀黑猩猩的行为多样性和地方传统来摧毁它们的文化。保护主义者必须转变关注点,不仅要保护物种和基因,还要保护基于文化的实体,因为即使种群恢复,失去的黑猩猩文化也无法恢复。
Human presence is destroying chimpanzee cultures by eroding their behavioral diversity and local traditions. Conservationists must shift focus from preserving only species and genes to also protecting culturally-based entities, as lost chimp cultures cannot be restored even if populations recover.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • homogenize 使同质化;使失去多样性而变得单一

    我们首先从 sentence structure 入手,看到三个 parallel consequences 都是 negative,前后都是 disappearance。然后通过 word formation 确认 homo- 表示 'same',-ize 表示 'make'。最后用 cross-paragraph evidence 验证:第1段 的 analogy 对应 第4段 的 diversity erosion。三条 clues converge 到同一个 meaning:使变得单一化,失去多样性。

    并列结构定性+构词法定义+段落呼应验证
  • wither 衰败;凋零;逐渐消失

    我们从 antithetical structure 入手,确定 wither 是 flourish 的 opposite。然后注意到它和 erode 在同一个 sentence 中 co-occur,describing 同一个 process。再看 broader context,发现 第6段 的 wipe out 描述同样的 cultural loss。这些 clues 共同指向:wither 表示逐渐衰败、凋零,specifically 用于描述 cultures gradually fading away。

    对比定向+近义共现+语义场验证
  • ironic 讽刺的;充满矛盾的(指事态发展与预期相悖)

    我们首先从 bitterly 这个 strong emotional modifier 判断 ironic 涉及某种令人痛苦的 situation。然后分析 sentence logic,发现 'just when we accept... they might vanish' 这个 temporal paradox。最后通过 第5段 的 parallel structure(just as we know... window is closing)验证:ironic 描述一种 outcome contradicts what one would expect 的 situation,specifically 这里是指我们刚认识到 animal cultures 的价值,却因为人类活动导致它们消失。

    情感定性+逻辑矛盾+平行结构印证
  • entities 实体;独立存在的事物(此处指保护对象)

    我们从 exemplification(like species)入手,确定 entities 是某种 category or unit。然后通过 parallel modifiers(genetically/culturally based)判断它是一个 abstract, neutral term。最后从 conservation discourse 的 context 看出,它是对 different types of conservation targets(species, cultures)的 generalization。综合来看,entities 是指作为某种 basis 之上的独立 units or objects,在此处特指 conservation 的 target objects。

    具体例示+修饰模式+论述功能
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 类比论证

    P1

    作者在开篇使用了 alien species 外星物种入侵地球的 hypothetical scenario 假设情景,将其与 humans 人类对 chimps 大猩猩的影响进行 parallel comparison 平行对比。这个 imaginative analogy 想象类比让读者immediately grasp 立即领会人类行为的 devastating impact 毁灭性影响,因为我们能轻易理解外星人毁灭人类文化的 catastrophic nature 灾难性本质。这种 rhetorical device 修辞手法将 abstract concept 抽象概念(文化消失)转化为 concrete scenario 具体场景,dramatically enhances 极大增强了论点的 persuasive power 说服力,为全文的 central argument 核心论点奠定了强有力的 emotional foundation 情感基础。

    信号词 Imagine that It's as if Similar to Just as Like In the same way Analogous to Comparable to Picture this Consider if

    仿写: 写作时可以先 identify 识别你要论证的 abstract concept 抽象概念,然后寻找一个读者 familiar with 熟悉的、结构上 analogous 类似的 scenario 场景。使用 'Imagine that...' 或 'It's as if...' 这样的 introductory phrases 引导短语来 construct 构建类比。确保两者之间有 clear parallel structure 清晰的平行结构,让 comparison 比较自然流畅。 仿写模版:Imagine that [熟悉场景A发生], and through [具体机制], [结果B出现]. That is effectively what [实际主体C] has been doing to [受影响对象D].

  • 举例论证

    P2

    作者引用了 Andrew Whiten 在1999年领导的 scientific research 科学研究作为 concrete evidence 具体证据,详细描述了不同 chimp communities 大猩猩群体如何 exhibit distinct behaviors 展现不同行为,比如 rapping branches 敲击树枝和 ripping leaves 撕裂树叶等39种 traditions 传统。这个 empirical example 实证例子为 'chimps have cultures' 大猩猩拥有文化这一 claim 论断提供了 solid scientific foundation 坚实的科学基础,使 abstract assertion 抽象断言变得 verifiable 可验证,同时也为后文关于 culture loss 文化丧失的 argument 论证建立了 baseline 基线,增强了整体论证的 credibility 可信度和 academic rigor 学术严谨性。

    信号词 showed that For example For instance A case in point demonstrated that research indicates studies reveal evidence suggests One illustration To illustrate

    仿写: 写作时应 select examples 选择例子时确保它们是 specific 具体的、verifiable 可验证的和 representative 有代表性的。可以先 state the general claim 陈述总体论断,然后用 'For instance'、'A team of scientists showed' 等 transitional markers 过渡标记引入例子。在 present the example 呈现例子时,包含 specific details 具体细节如数字、人名、地点等来 enhance credibility 增强可信度。 仿写模版:Back in [时间], [研究者/团队] showed that [具体发现]. [详细描述例子的具体表现]. The team identified [具体数据/发现]—a pattern that [对比或意义]. It was evidence that [结论].

  • 对比论证

    P4

    作者在 第4段 中构建了 sharp contrast 鲜明对比:一方面是 scientists 科学家们经过 long time 长期努力终于 accept 接受了 animal cultures 动物文化的 existence 存在,另一方面是这些 cultures 文化正在 vanish 消失。'Where we flourish, their cultures wither' 这句话通过 humans 人类和 chimps 大猩猩的 inverse relationship 反向关系,用 parallel structure 平行结构强化了 tragic irony 悲剧性讽刺。这种 stark juxtaposition 鲜明并置让读者 acutely feel 强烈感受到 temporal paradox 时间悖论:我们刚刚 recognize 认识到文化的 value 价值,却同时在 destroy 摧毁它,这 amplifies 放大了问题的 urgency 紧迫性和 gravity 严重性。

    信号词 But just when while whereas in contrast on the other hand however yet conversely unlike Where...their

    仿写: 构建对比论证时要 identify two opposing elements 识别两个对立元素,确保它们在 same dimension 同一维度上形成 meaningful contrast 有意义的对比。使用 parallel grammatical structures 平行语法结构来 present both sides 呈现双方,比如 'Where A does X, B does Y' 这种 pattern 模式。可以用 contrastive conjunctions 对比连词如 'but'、'while'、'yet' 来 signal the shift 标示转折。 仿写模版:Just when [群体A] have come to [积极行为/认知], [相反情况] might [消极结果]. Where [主体A] [动作1], [主体B] [相反动作2]. It is a [形容词] ironic thing to [时间背景/对比点].

  • 引用论证

    P5 P6

    作者在 第5段 中直接 quote 引用了 Andrew Whiten 的话,在 第6段 中引用了 Cat Hobaiter 的观点。这些 expert testimonies 专家证言来自 field authorities 领域权威,为文章的 central thesis 中心论题提供了 professional endorsement 专业背书。Whiten 的引用强调了 temporal irony 时间讽刺:我们 just getting to know 刚刚开始了解灵长类 cousins 近亲,却同时在 closing the window 关闭窗口。Hobaiter 的引用则 shifts focus 转移焦点到 individual communities 个体群落和 cultural uniqueness 文化独特性,deepening 深化了对 conservation 保护工作的 nuanced understanding 细致理解。这些 direct quotations 直接引用增强了论证的 authority 权威性和 emotional resonance 情感共鸣。

    信号词 says notes argues according to states claims observes points out emphasizes explains

    仿写: 使用引用论证时要 select authoritative sources 选择权威来源,确保被引用者在 relevant field 相关领域有 credibility 可信度。引入引用时用 attribution phrases 归属短语如 '[人名], a [头衔] at [机构], says' 来 establish credentials 建立资质。引用内容应 directly support 直接支持你的 argument 论点,而非 tangentially related 切线相关。引用后可以 briefly interpret 简要阐释其 significance 意义。 仿写模版:'[引用内容],' says/notes [人名], a [professional title] at [institution]. 或者 According to [专家], '[引用内容].' This [reinforces/highlights/demonstrates] [与论点的连接].

  • 比喻修辞

    P5

    文中 'closing the window' 这个 metaphor 隐喻将 opportunity to study chimps 研究大猩猩的机会比作一扇 window 窗户,而人类行为正在 close 关闭这扇窗。这个 visual image 视觉意象 vividly conveys 生动传达了机会的 time-sensitive nature 时效性和 irreversibility 不可逆性。Window 窗户暗示了 limited opening 有限开口和 potential closure 潜在关闭,这个 figurative language 比喻性语言使 abstract concept 抽象概念(了解的机会消失)变得 concrete 具体和 emotionally resonant 情感共鸣强烈,强化了 urgency 紧迫感,让读者能够 viscerally understand 本能地理解正在失去的 precious opportunity 宝贵机会。

    仿写: 创造比喻时要 identify abstract concept 识别需要阐释的抽象概念,然后 find concrete object 寻找一个具体物体或 familiar experience 熟悉经验,它与抽象概念之间有 structural similarity 结构相似性。选择的 vehicle 喻体应该是读者 universally recognize 普遍认识的,并且能够 naturally suggest 自然暗示你想表达的 attributes 属性。使用 implicit comparison 隐含比较(不用'像'),让比喻 seamlessly integrate 无缝融入叙述。 仿写模版:[抽象行为/情况] are [动词+具体意象名词] on [抽象事物]. 例如:Actions are closing the window on opportunities / Time is eroding the foundation of trust.

  • 排比修辞

    P6

    在 第6段 中,Hobaiter 使用了三个 parallel phrases 平行短语:'each population, each community, even each generation',这种 repetitive structure 重复结构通过 'each' 的 anaphora 首语重复和 escalating specificity 递进具体性(从 population 到 generation)来 emphasize 强调 chimps 大猩猩的 uniqueness 独特性存在于 multiple levels 多个层次。这个 rhetorical pattern 修辞模式 rhythmically reinforces 节奏性地强化了每个 level 层次都 matters 重要的观点,creating 创造一种 cumulative effect 累积效应,让读者深刻感受到 cultural loss 文化丧失的 comprehensive scope 全面范围,从而 strengthen 强化了保护工作需要 consider individual uniqueness 考虑个体独特性的 argument 论证。

    信号词 each every all both...and not only...but also whether...or first...second...third

    仿写: 构建排比时要 select series of related elements 选择一系列相关元素,确保它们在 logical relationship 逻辑关系上 progress 递进或 parallel 并列。使用 consistent grammatical structure 一致的语法结构(相同的词类、时态、句式)来 present each item 呈现每一项。可以用 repeated words 重复词(如 'each')或 repeated sentence patterns 重复句式来 create rhythm 创造节奏。通常三项或以上效果最佳。 仿写模版:Each [对象1], each [对象2], even each [对象3] is [共同特征]. 或者 We must [动作1], [动作2], and [动作3] to [目标].

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

7 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 外星人入侵的夸张类比暗示人类破坏的严重性

    P1
    Imagine that an alien species landed on Earth and, through their mere presence, those aliens caused our art to vanish, our music to homogenize, and our technological know-how to disappear. That is effectively what humans have been doing to our closest relatives—chimps.

    假设类比 Imagine that Suppose that What if Picture this Consider a scenario where Let's say Envision

    表面在描述 alien invasion 的 catastrophic scenario,但通过 'That is effectively what' 这个 equivalence marker 揭示言外之意:人类对黑猩猩文化的破坏 devastating impact 其实和外星人毁灭人类文明一样严重。这个 shocking comparison 为整篇文章 establish 了 urgency 和 moral gravity,为后续论证人类活动 eroding chimp cultures 提供了强有力的 emotional foundation 和 rhetorical weight,直接 support 文章主旨中关于 'human presence is destroying' 的核心论点。

  • 时间对比暗示认知转变的讽刺性

    P2
    Back in 1999, a team of scientists led by Andrew Whiten showed that chimps from different parts of Africa behave very differently from one another... at the time, hadn't been seen in any animal except humans.

    时间对比 Back in 1999 Back in At the time Then In those days Years ago Previously

    表面在 recount 1999年的 groundbreaking discovery,但通过 temporal framing 暗示言外之意:当时这个 discovery 是 revolutionary 的,但现在这些刚被 recognized 的 cultures 正在 vanish。这个 temporal setup 为第4段的 'bitterly ironic' 做 foreshadowing,强化了文章主旨中 'just as we are getting to know them, they are disappearing' 的 tragic timing,突出保护的 urgency。

  • 让步转折暗示新发现的脆弱性

    P4
    But just when many scientists have come to accept the existence of animal cultures, many of those cultures might vanish... It is a bitterly ironic thing to learn on the 20th anniversary of Whiten's classic study.

    让步转折类 But just when Just as Even as Despite the fact that Although While Even though

    表面在陈述 scientific acceptance 和 cultural loss 的 coincidence,但 'bitterly ironic' 这个 explicit evaluation 揭示深层含义:人类在刚刚 recognize 黑猩猩文化的 existence 时就在 destroying 它们,这种 timing 极其 tragic 和 ironic。这直接呼应文章主旨中 'just as we are truly getting to know them, we are closing the window' 的核心 paradox,强化了 immediate action 的 necessity。

  • 引语中的时间对比强化紧迫感

    P5
    It's amazing to think that just 60 years ago, we knew next to nothing of the behavior of our sister species in the wild. But now, just as we are truly getting to know our primate cousins, the actions of humans are closing the window on all we have discovered.

    时间对比+转折 just 60 years ago... But now, just as just...ago only recently barely hardly merely a short time ago

    Whiten 作为 original researcher 的 quote 表面在回顾 scientific progress,但 'closing the window' 这个 metaphor 暗示言外之意:我们 understanding 黑猩猩文化的 opportunity 正在 rapidly disappearing,而且这个 window 可能 permanently close。这种 expert testimony 为文章主旨中 'human presence is destroying' 提供 authoritative support,并通过 'window closing' metaphor 强调 irreversibility 和 immediate action 的 necessity。

  • 个体视角转换揭示保护盲区

    P6
    Sometimes in the rush to conserve the species, I think we forget about the individuals... Each population, each community, even each generation of chimps is unique... we may never be able to restore that culture.

    委婉反思类 Sometimes... I think we forget Sometimes Perhaps I think It seems We tend to We often forget

    Hobaiter 教授表面在 gently suggest conservation efforts 有 oversight,但言外之意是对 current conservation paradigm 的 fundamental critique:保护 species numbers 不等于保护 cultures。'We may never be able to restore that culture' 这个 irreversibility statement 强化了言外之意的 gravity。这直接 support 文章主旨最后部分 'conservationists must shift focus... to also protecting culturally-based entities',揭示了 traditional conservation approach 的 critical limitation。

  • 知识空白的否定表述暗示研究局限

    P7
    No one knows whether the destruction of chimp culture is getting worse. Few places have tracked chimp behavior over long periods, and those that have are also more likely to have protected their animals from human influence.

    否定陈述类 No one knows Nobody can say It's unclear We don't know It remains uncertain There's no evidence Few can tell

    表面在承认 knowledge gap,但通过解释 'few places have tracked... and those that have are also more likely to have protected' 揭示言外之意:我们可能 systematically underestimating 问题的 severity,因为有 long-term data 的地方恰恰是 protected areas,而 unprotected areas 的 deterioration 可能 much worse。这个 implicit warning 强化文章主旨中 'human presence is destroying' 的论点,暗示实际情况可能比已知的 even more alarming。

  • 范式转变呼吁暗示根本性重构

    P8
    Obviously, conservationists need to think about saving species in a completely new way—by preserving animal traditions as well as bodies and genes. Instead of focusing only on the conservation of genetically based entities like species, we now need to also consider culturally based entities.

    程度强化类 in a completely new way completely new way entirely different fundamentally change radically rethink total overhaul wholly new

    表面在提出 conservation strategy adjustment,但 'completely new way' 和 'instead of focusing only' 揭示言外之意:当前的 conservation paradigm fundamentally flawed,因为它 ignore cultural dimension。通过 Whiten 的 authoritative voice 和 'genetically based entities' vs 'culturally based entities' 的 clear dichotomy,这个 concluding statement 完整 articulate 文章主旨的 prescriptive component:'conservationists must shift focus... to also protecting culturally-based entities',为全文 argument 提供 definitive solution framework。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:消极批判

结论先行:本文作者态度为消极批判( deeply concerned and critical)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇比喻定调 P1

    议论文的 opening paragraph 往往通过 striking comparison 或 vivid imagery 来 reveal author's stance,这里 alien causing art to vanish 的 dystopian scenario 明显表达了作者对 human behavior 的 strong disapproval。

  2. 描述对比显偏向 P2 P3 P4

    议论文作者通过 selective emphasis 和 contrasting descriptions 来 guide readers' perception。这里作者 highlight chimps 的 remarkable traditions 和 cultural diversity,然后 emphasize humans 正在 erode 和 destroy 这些 cultures,这种 juxtaposition 明确显示作者 sympathizes with chimps 而 criticizes human actions。

  3. 情感强度词定性 P4 P5 P6

    议论文作者的 emotional involvement 通过 intensity markers 显现。这里 'bitterly ironic' 和 'closing the window' 等 expressions 不仅 convey information,更 reveal 作者的 deep concern 和 frustration,这种 emotionally charged language 是 strong criticism 的 hallmark。

  4. 结尾呼吁明态度 P8

    议论文的 conclusion 往往 crystallize author's position through recommendations。这里作者 explicitly calls for conservationists 改变 approach,用 'need to' 这种 strong modal 表明其不仅是 criticizing current practice,更在 urging reform,这 confirm 了其 critical yet constructive attitude。

  5. 将 multiple linguistic signals 整合分析能 triangulate author's true position。单一 indicator 可能 misleading,但当 metaphorical framing, lexical choices, emotional intensity, 和 prescriptive language 全都 point to same direction 时,author's attitude 就 unmistakable。

文中的态度信号词

  • vanish P1

    这个 verb 表达了 complete and irreversible loss,带有强烈的 negative connotation。作者用它 describe human impact on chimp culture,immediately 传达了 alarm 和 criticism,因为 'vanish' implies 某种 valuable 的东西被 permanently taken away。

    同类词 disappear wither erode destroy wipe out

  • bitterly ironic P4

    这个 adverbial phrase 包含 double emotional load:'bitterly' 表达 deep disappointment,'ironic' 指出 situation 的 contradictory nature。作者用它来 emphasize 刚刚 accept chimp cultures 就要 lose them 的 tragic timing,这 intensifies 他的 critical stance。

    同类词 tragically sadly unfortunately regrettably distressingly

  • eroded P4

    这个 verb 用 gradual destruction 的 imagery 来 describe human impact,比 'changed' 或 'affected' 更具 negative judgment。'Erode' 暗示了 slow but relentless damage,这 reinforces 作者对 human presence 作为 destructive force 的 portrayal。

    同类词 undermined degraded diminished weakened compromised

  • closing the window P5

    这个 metaphorical expression 传达了 urgency 和 imminent loss 的 sense。'Window' 暗示 limited opportunity,'closing' 强调 time sensitivity,together 它们 create 一种 'now or never' 的 atmosphere,pushing readers toward 作者的 call for action。

    同类词 shutting the door running out of time last chance point of no return tipping point

  • need to P8

    这个 modal verb 表达 strong necessity 和 obligation,作者用它来 frame 保护 chimp culture 不是 optional 而是 imperative。'Need to' 的 deontic force 把作者的 suggestion 提升为 urgent requirement,这 confirms 他的 critical stance 是 action-oriented 而非 passive observation。

    同类词 must have to should ought to it is imperative

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. provocative 类比开篇 P1

    第1段 用了一个 alien analogy 这种 dramatic scenario,直接 point out 人类对黑猩猩文化的 devastating impact。这种 provocative opening 是 argumentative essay 的典型标志,而 expository article 会用 neutral introduction,news report 则会用 factual lead。

  2. 情感化词汇密度 P4 P5 P6

    第4段 使用了 'bitterly ironic'、'eroded'、'wither' 这些带有 negative connotation 的词汇,第6段 用了 'wipe out' 这种 catastrophic language。这些 evaluative expressions 明确传达 author's concern 和 critical perspective,是 argumentative writing 的 hallmark。

  3. 专家引语的说服功能 P5 P6 P8

    第5段 引用 Whiten 的话强调 'closing the window',第6段 引用 Hobaiter 强调 'wipe out an entire culture',第8段 再次引用 Whiten 提出 conservation approach 的 shift。这些 quotes 不是 neutral explanation,而是在 build up 一个 urgent call for change,serve argumentative purpose。

  4. 行动呼吁结尾 P8

    第8段 明确提出 'conservationists need to think about saving species in a completely new way',使用 'need to' 这种 imperative language 来 advocate for policy change。这是典型的 argumentative conclusion,在 push for action 而非 merely stating facts。

  5. 立场-论证-呼吁三段论 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

    本文通过 alien analogy 建立 critical stance(第1段),提供 empirical evidence about culture erosion(第2段-7),使用 emotionally charged language 和 expert testimonies 来 emphasize urgency,最终 call for conservation paradigm shift(第8段)。整个 narrative arc 是在 argue for 一个 position:人类活动正在 destroy chimp cultures,我们 need to change conservation approach。这是典型的 argumentative structure。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • bitterly ironic P4 立场表态词 tragically unfortunately regrettably alarmingly disturbingly
  • I think P6 观点引导词 I believe In my opinion It seems to me I would argue I contend
  • but P4 论证逻辑连接词 however yet nevertheless nonetheless on the contrary
  • need to P8 立场表态词 must should ought to it is essential that it is imperative that
  • Instead of P8 论证逻辑连接词 Rather than As opposed to In place of Not... but Instead
  • It is amazing to think P5 立场表态词 It is amazing that It is remarkable that It is striking that It is significant that It is troubling that
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

6 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 的常见问题

2020年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (2) 文章 Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 的原文出自哪里?
The Atlantic《大西洋月刊》2019.03.08文章Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss(大猩猩正在遭受悲剧性的损失)。
2020年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 的主旨是什么?
人类的存在正在通过侵蚀黑猩猩的行为多样性和地方传统来摧毁它们的文化。保护主义者必须转变关注点,不仅要保护物种和基因,还要保护基于文化的实体,因为即使种群恢复,失去的黑猩猩文化也无法恢复。(英文表述:Human presence is destroying chimpanzee cultures by eroding their behavioral diversity and local traditions. Conservationists must shift focus from preserving only species and genes to also protecting culturally-based entities, as lost chimp cultures cannot be restored even if populations recover.)
Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss(2020年12月英语六级真题第3套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是消极批判(deeply concerned and critical)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 444 词、8 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2020年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 8 段按议论文骨架分为 5 个意群:引言 · 第1段——外星人类比引出黑猩猩文化消失现象;分论点 · 第2段、第3段——科学证据:黑猩猩拥有独特文化传统;分论点 · 第4段、第5段——转折论证:人类活动正摧毁黑猩猩文化;分论点 · 第6段、第7段——深化论证:文化损失的不可逆性与监测困境;结论 · 第8段——行动呼吁:保护策略的根本性转变。
Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是消极批判(deeply concerned and critical)。判断路径:开篇比喻定调 → 描述对比显偏向 → 情感强度词定性 → 结尾呼吁明态度 → 多维信号整合判断;文中的态度信号词包括 vanish(第1段)、bitterly ironic(第4段)、eroded(第4段)、closing the window(第5段)、need to(第8段)。
2020年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 Chimpanzees Are Going Through a Tragic Loss 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:homogenize(使同质化;使失去多样性而变得单一)、wither(衰败;凋零;逐渐消失)、ironic(讽刺的;充满矛盾的(指事态发展与预期相悖))、entities(实体;独立存在的事物(此处指保护对象)),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: