2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color
CET-6 · 来自 2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 · Part III Section C (1) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color

2023年3月英语六级真题第1套文章逐层精读

New York Times《纽约时报》2016.07.14文章Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color(相同找相同,相异找相异,新生的小鸭子也能区辨形状和颜色的异同)。

本页是 2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇新闻报道全文 446 词、12 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

12 段英文原文

以下为2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 12 段。左侧 P1–P12 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color

The ability to make inferences from same and different, once thought to be unique to humans, is viewed as a cornerstone of abstract intelligent thought. A new study, however, has shown that what psychologists call same-different discrimination is present in creatures generally seen as unintelligent: newborn ducklings(小鸭).

The study, published Thursday in Science, challenges our idea of what it means to have a birdbrain, said Edward Wasserman, an experimental psychologist at the University of Iowa who wrote an independent review of the study.

"In fact, birds are extremely intelligent and our problem pretty much lies in figuring out how to get them to 'talk' to us, or tell us how smart they really are," he said.

Antone Martinho and Alex Kacelnik, co-authors of the new paper, devised a clever experiment to better test bird intelligence.

First, they took 1-day-old ducklings and exposed them to a pair of moving objects. The two objects were either the same or different in shape or color. Then they exposed each duckling to two entirely new pairs of moving objects.

The researchers found that about 70% of the ducklings preferred to move toward the pair of objects that had the same shape or color relationship as the first objects they saw. A duckling that was first shown two green spheres, in other words, was more likely to move toward a pair of blue spheres than a mismatched pair of orange and purple spheres.

Ducklings go through a rapid learning process called imprinting shortly after birth—it's what allows them to identify and follow their mothers.

These findings suggest that ducklings use abstract relationships between sensory inputs like color, shape, sounds and odor to recognize their mothers, said Dr. Kacelnik.

By studying imprinting, the authors of this study have shown for the first time that an animal can learn relationships between concepts without training, said Jeffrey Katz, an experimental psychologist at Auburn University who was not involved in the study.

Previous studies have suggested that other animals, including pigeons, dolphins, honeybees and some primates(灵长类动物), can discern same from different, but only after extensive training.

Adding ducklings to the list—particularly untrained newborn ducklings—suggests that the ability to compare abstract concepts "is far more necessary to a wider variety of animals' survival than we previously thought," Dr. Martinho said. He believes the ability is so crucial because it helps animals consider context when identifying objects in their environment.

It's clear from this study and others like it that "animals process and appreciate far more of the intricacies in their world than we've ever understood," Dr. Wasserman said. "We are in a revolutionary phase in terms of our ability to understand the minds of other animals."

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

12 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Ducklings Challenge Human Uniqueness

    A new study shows that newborn ducklings can make same-different discriminations once thought unique to humans.

    本段是全文的 lead,通过“人类独有”与“新生小鸭也会”之间的 contrast,浓缩呈现文章主旨:abstract reasoning 可能比过去认为的更普遍。

    抓住“旧观点—新发现”转折
  2. P2

    Rethinking the Birdbrain Stereotype

    The Science study challenges the common belief that birds are unintelligent.

    本段承接首段发现,以权威专家的 assessment 放大其意义,使文章主旨从“小鸭会辨别”提升到“鸟类智能观需要修正”。

    提炼专家评价的结论
  3. P3

    The Challenge of Measuring Bird Intelligence

    Birds may be highly intelligent, but humans need better ways to measure their intelligence.

    本段解释了为何新研究重要:它不只发现能力,也提供了一种让动物“表达” cognition 的观察窗口,从而服务全文对动物心智的新认识。

    拆分引语的结论与原因
  4. P4

    A Clever Test of Bird Intelligence

    The researchers designed a clever experiment to test bird intelligence.

    本段是结构上的 bridge,把前文关于鸟类智能的评价,转入后文可验证的实验过程,使报道从观点进入 evidence。

    锁定实验设计目的
  5. P5

    Testing Abstract Relationships with New Objects

    The experiment exposed ducklings to an initial same-or-different relationship and then tested them with new object pairs.

    本段提供研究方法这一核心 evidence 基础,说明文章的“抽象推理”结论并非来自简单观察,而来自经过设计的关系测试。

    顺着步骤找控制设计
  6. P6

    Ducklings Recognize Matching Relationships

    Most ducklings preferred new object pairs that preserved the same relationship they had first seen.

    本段给出全文最有力的实验 result,直接证明小鸭能够跨越不同物体识别 same-different relationship,是文章主旨的证据核心。

    用数据与例子锁定结果
  7. P7

    Imprinting: Rapid Learning After Birth

    Imprinting is a rapid post-birth learning process that helps ducklings recognize and follow their mothers.

    本段为实验发现补充 natural context,表明小鸭的快速学习并非孤立现象,而与其识别母亲、获得保护的生存机制有关。

    用术语功能回扣实验
  8. P8

    Abstract Reasoning Helps Mother Recognition

    Ducklings may use abstract sensory relationships to recognize their mothers.

    本段把“能区分相同和不同”的实验行为,解释为可能服务于母亲识别的 cognitive function,从而强化文章关于能力具有生存意义的主线。

    保留“研究暗示”的语气
  9. P9

    Concept Learning Without Training

    The study shows for the first time that an animal can learn conceptual relationships without training.

    本段用独立专家的评价确认研究的 originality,进一步支撑文章主旨中“抽象推理并非人类专属,且可自然出现”的核心论断。

    抓住“首次、无需训练”创新点
  10. P10

    Earlier Evidence Required Training

    Previous research found same-different discrimination in several animals, but only after extensive training.

    本段通过回顾 previous studies 建立比较基准,反衬新生小鸭未经训练就表现出该能力的非凡之处。

    重读but后的限制条件
  11. P11

    Abstract Comparison as a Survival Skill

    The duckling findings suggest that abstract comparison is widespread and important for animal survival.

    本段最直接地呼应文章主旨,指出这种能力不仅并非人类独有,而且可能是多类动物理解环境、实现 survival 的必要认知工具。

    从发现推到生存意义
  12. P12

    A Revolution in Understanding Animal Minds

    The study reflects a revolutionary shift toward recognizing the complexity of animal minds.

    本段作为 conclusion,将小鸭实验纳入动物认知研究的更大变革,最终收束全文:人类正在重新认识动物 intelligence 与心智复杂性。

    从结尾评价提炼全局意义
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

12 道逐段细节自检题

针对2023年3月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 new study same-different discrimination

    What did the new study reveal about same-different discrimination?

    • A It remains a cognitive ability unique to humans.
    • B It develops in ducklings only after long-term training.
    • C It is found in newborn ducklings as well as in humans.
    • D It enables ducklings to distinguish their mothers by sound alone.
    • E It proves that all birds possess advanced abstract intelligence.
    • F It is the name of a learning process that occurs after birth.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项保留 found in 与 newborn ducklings 两个事实骨架,并用 as well as 表达这种能力并非人类独有。障碍在于该表述只说明能力的存在范围,并未把小鸭的整体 intelligence 等同于人类。

    转折后对象核验 时间紧时,用 same-different discrimination 直接定位 第1段,再把 however 后的结论压缩为能力与对象之间的关系。选择与该关系同义的正确项,并优先排除含 only、all 或 after training 等额外限制的选项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 Edward Wasserman birdbrain

    According to Edward Wasserman, what assumption does the study challenge?

    • A The view that birds cannot communicate with humans.
    • B The claim that Science publishes only human intelligence studies.
    • C The idea that ducklings learn by imprinting before birth.
    • D The belief that having a birdbrain means lacking intelligence.
    • E The belief that abstract thought is unnecessary for survival.
    • F The view that all animals are equally intelligent.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项把 have a birdbrain 的习语性表达释义为 lacking intelligence,准确承接 challenges our idea。理解障碍在于原文并非词典式定义,考生需要结合前后语境还原其贬义评价。

    引号标签释义 用 Edward Wasserman 和 birdbrain 定位 第2段,只读取 challenge 所支配的观念。将该习语还原为对鸟类智力的负面标签,再选择准确表达这一旧假设的正确项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 problem how smart

    Where does the problem in determining how smart birds really are lie?

    • A Teaching birds to speak human languages.
    • B Proving that birds are less intelligent than mammals.
    • C Preventing ducklings from following their mothers.
    • D Training newborn ducklings to compare colors.
    • E Finding a way for birds to demonstrate how intelligent they are.
    • F Classifying every bird species by its cognitive ability.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项把 figuring out how to get them to talk to us, or tell us how smart they really are 概括为让鸟类 demonstrate intelligence。原文中的 talk 是比喻性表达,指通过可观察行为显示认知能力,而不是教授人类语言。

    lies in后取难点 以 problem 和 how smart 定位 第3段,只截取 lies in 后的解释。把并列的不定式压缩为让动物显露能力,再选择表达这一证据获取障碍的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Martinho and Kacelnik devised

    Why did Martinho and Kacelnik devise their experiment?

    • A To teach ducklings to recognize their mothers.
    • B To compare the intelligence of birds and humans.
    • C To train animals to discriminate between colors.
    • D To identify which bird species survive best.
    • E To reproduce results from earlier dolphin studies.
    • F To provide a better test of bird intelligence.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    正确项等值改写 to better test bird intelligence,保留目的和 better 的比较含义。clever experiment 只评价设计方式,不能据此把研究目的改成预先证明某个结论。

    不定式目的直取 用 devised 定位 第4段,直接读取其后的目的不定式。目的题无需展开实验流程,只需将该结构与选项逐项核验,选择目标一致的正确项。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 first moving objects

    What happened after the ducklings first viewed a pair of moving objects?

    • A Each duckling was shown two completely new pairs of moving objects.
    • B Each duckling was trained to follow the first pair.
    • C The original objects were changed only in color.
    • D The ducklings were returned to their mothers.
    • E They were exposed to the same pair for a second time.
    • F They chose between sounds and odors.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    正确项对应 each duckling、two entirely new pairs 等关键限制,动作和数量均符合后续步骤。障碍在于题干提到初始的一对物体,而下一阶段的数量与材料状态发生了变化。

    相邻流程节点 用 first 和 moving objects 定位 第5段,把实验过程压缩成相邻节点,只读取题干所给节点之后的动作。正确项必须同时符合后续步骤的动作、数量与材料状态。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 move toward same shape or color relationship

    Which objects did most ducklings tend to move toward?

    • A Pairs made of the exact same objects as the original pair.
    • B Pairs preserving the same shape or color relationship as the original pair.
    • C Pairs of stationary objects rather than moving objects.
    • D Pairs showing the opposite shape or color relationship from the original pair.
    • E Pairs that were closer to the ducklings' mothers.
    • F Pairs whose relationship was based only on sounds and odors.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    正确项将 same shape or color relationship as the first objects 改写为 preserving the same relationship as the original pair。关键障碍是保持的是对象之间的 relationship,而不是要求新对象与原对象在外观上完全相同。

    删实例留关系 用 move toward 定位 第6段,并把行为宾语连同其关系限定整体提取。忽略解释性例子中的具体材料,选择保留 same relationship 规则的正确项。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 imprinting identify and follow their mothers

    What is the function of imprinting in ducklings?

    • A It teaches them to distinguish colors after repeated training.
    • B It helps them compare human and bird intelligence.
    • C It enables them to identify and follow their mothers.
    • D It allows them to survive without recognizing other animals.
    • E It occurs only after ducklings reach adulthood.
    • F It makes them prefer objects of different colors.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项完整保留 identify 与 follow 两个并列动作及共同宾语 their mothers,准确对应 allows them to 的功能说明。

    功能动词后打包 以 imprinting 定位 第7段,直接寻找功能动词所引出的动作,并把并列谓语作为一个整体。选择同时保留完整动作和宾语的正确项。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 findings suggest recognize their mothers

    What do the findings suggest about how ducklings recognize their mothers?

    • A They rely exclusively on their mothers' colors.
    • B They learn their mothers' identities through extensive instruction.
    • C They memorize the exact objects shown in the experiment.
    • D They use abstract relationships among sensory inputs such as color and shape.
    • E They can recognize any animal through sound alone.
    • F They choose mothers that match their own shape.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项保留 use、abstract relationships 和 sensory inputs 三层核心,并用 such as 表示 color 与 shape 只是例子。它没有把机制限缩为单一感官,也没有把 suggest 升级为确定证明。

    从结果倒读机制 用 findings suggest 和 recognize their mothers 定位 第8段,再从结果动作向前倒读其方式结构。正确项必须保留抽象处理机制和多类 sensory inputs,而不能加入排他限制。

  9. 第 9 段 定位词 Jeffrey Katz for the first time

    What does Jeffrey Katz consider the study to have demonstrated for the first time?

    • A All animals can learn abstract concepts immediately after birth.
    • B Ducklings need extensive training to recognize relationships.
    • C Birds can communicate their thoughts directly to psychologists.
    • D Only primates can form relationships between concepts.
    • E An animal can learn relationships between concepts without training.
    • F Mothers train ducklings to identify colors and shapes.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    正确项忠实保留 animal、learn relationships between concepts 和 without training 三项信息。首次展示的并非动物普遍聪明,而是这种关系学习能够在没有训练的条件下发生。

    主体能力条件三格 用 Jeffrey Katz 和 for the first time 定位 第9段,把相关从句切成主体、能力和条件三格。正确项必须三格同时匹配,任何全称扩大或条件反转都可直接排除。

  10. 第 10 段 定位词 previous studies discern same from different

    What was required before the animals in previous studies could discern same from different?

    • A They had to be newborn ducklings.
    • B They had to follow their mothers shortly after birth.
    • C They had to be exposed only to objects of the same color.
    • D They had to communicate with experimental psychologists.
    • E They had to learn from primates.
    • F They had to undergo extensive training.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    正确项将 but only after extensive training 改写为 had to undergo extensive training,准确保留必要条件和训练强度。

    跳名单抓条件 用 previous studies 定位 第10段,不读中间的动物名单,直接截取 but only after 后的条件。把 only after 转换为必须先发生什么,再选择其同义表达作为正确项。

  11. 第 11 段 定位词 Martinho crucial

    Why does Martinho believe the ability to compare abstract concepts is crucial?

    • A It helps animals consider context when identifying objects in their environment.
    • B It enables animals to communicate verbally with humans.
    • C It guarantees survival for every animal species.
    • D It allows ducklings to avoid all unfamiliar objects.
    • E It replaces the need for imprinting after birth.
    • F It makes objects appear identical in color and shape.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    正确项完整保留 helps animals、consider context 和 identifying objects in their environment 的功能链,准确对应 because 后的直接解释。

    because后功能链 用 crucial 定位 第11段,沿 because 直接截取原因从句。正确项应完整复现 consider context 与 identifying objects 的功能链,而不是只复述更宏观的 survival 意义。

  12. 第 12 段 定位词 Wasserman minds

    How does Wasserman characterize the current state of research into animal minds?

    • A It has reached a final and complete understanding of animal intelligence.
    • B It is in a revolutionary phase of improving understanding of other animals' minds.
    • C It is becoming less interested in the intricacies of animal life.
    • D It focuses exclusively on the minds of newborn ducklings.
    • E It proves that animals think exactly like humans.
    • F It can now make animals explain their thoughts in words.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    正确项保留 revolutionary phase 与 improving understanding 两个中心,并明确变化发生在人类理解 other animals' minds 的能力上,而不是动物心智本身突然发生变化。

    评价对象校准 用 Wasserman 与 minds 组合定位 第12段,直接提取总结性评价及其作用对象。正确项必须把 revolutionary phase 归于人类理解动物心智的研究进展,而不能改成动物自身变化或研究已经完成。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的新闻报道骨架

按新闻报道 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 研究发现引入

    这个 opening lead 直接呈现了 the most newsworthy element:newborn ducklings 能够进行 same-different discrimination,这挑战了 conventional wisdom 认为这种 abstract reasoning ability 是 human-unique 的观点。

    作为 news report 的 lead paragraph,它遵循 inverted pyramid structure,immediately 向 readers 传递了 the most important information:ducklings 具备 abstract intelligence,从而 establish 整篇 article 的 central claim 并 hook readers' attention。

    核心发现陈述
  2. 研究权威性确立

    这组 paragraphs 通过 citing the study's publication venue(Science journal)和 expert commentary(Edward Wasserman 的 independent review),来 establish credibility 并 provide authoritative perspective on bird intelligence,especially 纠正了 birdbrain 这个 misconception。

    在 news reporting 中,第二层级通常 provide attribution and expert validation。这个 sense group 通过 multiple credibility markers(prestigious journal + expert psychologist)来 reinforce 前面的 claim,同时 Wasserman 的 quote 进一步 contextualize the significance,telling readers 这不仅是 isolated finding,而是关于 animal cognition 的 broader insight。

    专家背书佐证
  3. 实验方法阐述

    这个 section 详细描述了 the experimental design:researchers 如何 expose 1-day-old ducklings to paired objects,然后 test 它们对 new object pairs 的 preference,最终 finding 70% of ducklings preferred pairs with same relationship,这 demonstrate 了它们的 abstract reasoning ability。

    News reports 在 establish credibility 后需要 provide concrete evidence。这个 sense group 通过 detailed methodology description 让 readers understand how the conclusion was reached,increasing transparency and persuasiveness。The step-by-step account(exposure → testing → results)follows scientific reporting conventions,给主旨提供了 empirical foundation。

    实验过程揭示
  4. 机制解释深化

    这部分 explain the underlying mechanism:ducklings 的 same-different discrimination 与它们的 imprinting process 相关。通过 biological context(imprinting)和 Kacelnik 的 interpretation,readers 理解了 why ducklings have this ability—it helps them recognize mothers through abstract relationships between sensory inputs。

    在 news analysis 中,after presenting findings,通常需要 explain why or how it works。这个 sense group 提供了 mechanistic explanation,connecting the observed ability to known biological process(imprinting)。这种 explanation 让 the discovery 更 comprehensible and meaningful,showing it's not just random ability but serves adaptive function。

    生物学机制揭示
  5. 研究意义评价

    这个 concluding section 通过 multiple experts' perspectives(Katz, Martinho, Wasserman)来 evaluate the broader significance:这是 first demonstration of untrained concept learning,相比 other animals 需要 extensive training,ducklings 的 ability 表明 abstract reasoning 对 animal survival 比 previously thought 更 crucial and widespread。

    News reports typically end with significance and implications。这个 sense group 通过 comparative context(other animals need training)和 expert assessments 来 amplify the study's importance,showing 它不只是 about ducklings,而是 fundamentally challenges our understanding of animal minds。The progressive broadening from specific finding to general implication provides satisfying closure。

    研究价值提炼
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段新旧对比 P1

    新闻报道类文章通常在首段就会 present 最核心的 discovery 或 breakthrough,同时通过 contrast 来突出 significance。这个 duckling study 在开头就明确指出了 same-different discrimination 这个 ability 从 humans-only 到 newborn ducklings 的转变,这种 shift 本身就是 main point

  2. 权威背书确认 P2 P3

    科学新闻必定会 cite 权威 publication 和 independent experts 来 establish credibility。这里 Science journal 的 publication 加上 University of Iowa 的 psychologist review,都在 reinforce 这个 discovery 的 significance。当 expert 说这 challenges our idea 时,就是在 echo 主旨

  3. 实验设计验证 P4 P5 P6

    实验设计段落虽然 detailed,但关键是要看它如何 prove 首段的 claim。这里 1-day-old ducklings 和 without training 这两个 conditions 是 critical,因为它们直接 address 了 'newborn' 和 'untrained' 这两个让 finding 变得 significant 的要素

  4. 对比凸显意义 P10 P11

    文章中段对比了 previous studies 中其他动物需要 extensive training 才能做到的事情,而 ducklings 却 untrained 就能做到。这个 comparison 强化了 finding 的 revolutionary nature。结尾段的 implications 则把 discovery 推向更 general 的层面

  5. 四层信息整合 P1 P2 P6 P11 P12

    主旨就是这四个 components 的 synthesis:首段的 discovery(newborn ducklings can discriminate)+ 权威的 validation(challenges assumptions)+ 实验的 proof(without training)+ 深层的 implication(abstract reasoning more widespread)。这四层叠加就完整构成了文章的 central message

主旨信号词 however P1 challenges P2 newborn P1 first time P9 far more P11 revolutionary P12

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

《科学》杂志发表的一项新研究表明,刚出生的小鸭无需训练就能区分相同和不同的概念,这挑战了以往对动物智力的假设。这种曾被认为是人类独有的能力表明,抽象推理比我们之前认为的更加普遍,且对动物生存至关重要。
A new study published in Science reveals that newborn ducklings can distinguish between same and different concepts without training, challenging previous assumptions about animal intelligence. This ability, once thought unique to humans, suggests abstract reasoning is more widespread and crucial for animal survival than previously believed.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • inference 推断;推理

    现在我们把三条 clues 串起来。首先,这个 ability 是 abstract intelligent thought 的 cornerstone,说明它是高级的 cognitive process。其次,它是 from same and different,意味着从 specific observations 出发。最后,词根分析显示 carry information into mind。综合起来,inference 就是一种根据 observed evidence 或 given information,通过 reasoning 得出 conclusion 的 mental process,即推断或推理。

    认知术语三维分析法
  • cornerstone 基石;基础

    我们先看 sentence structure,X is a cornerstone of Y 表明 X 是 Y 的 fundamental part。再看 compound word 的构成,corner + stone 在 architecture 中指决定整个建筑 position 和 stability 的首块石头。将这两条线索结合,cornerstone 在 figurative sense 中就是指某个 system 或 field 的 foundational element,是支撑整个体系的关键基石。

    隐喻词汇双重解码法
  • imprinting 印记;印刻

    综合三条 clues:首先,从 function 看,imprinting 是一个让 newborn animals 快速 identify their mothers 的 learning process。其次,从 etymology 看,imprint 的本义是把东西深深 press into,暗示这是一种 deep 和 lasting 的 encoding。最后,从 characteristics 看,它是 rapid、automatic、发生在 critical period 的 innate mechanism。将这些整合,imprinting 就是指动物在出生后 critical period 内,快速且持久地 learn to recognize 和 attach to 某个 object(通常是 mother)的 innate behavioral process,即印记、印刻。

    专业术语三层递进法
  • discern 辨别;识别

    现在整合两条 clues。从 syntactic pattern 看,discern X from Y 的结构直接表明它是 distinguish X and Y 的意思。从 etymology 看,dis- + cernere 的组合表示 separate apart through careful examination。两条线索完全一致:discern 就是通过 careful observation 或 judgment,把两个 things 区分开来,认出它们的 difference,即辨别、识别。

    句法词源交叉验证法
  • intricacy 复杂性;错综复杂之处

    结合两条 clues:从 semantic field 看,intricacies 是 animals' world 中那些被 process 和 appreciate 的 elements,context 暗示它们是 complex 和 subtle 的。从 etymology 看,intricate 源自 entangle 和 complicate 的概念,intricacy 就是 complexity 和 elaborate detail。整合起来,intricacies 指的是事物中 complex、elaborate、和 detailed 的 aspects,即复杂性、错综复杂的细节。在这个 context 中,指的是动物世界中那些 intricate patterns 和 subtle relationships。

    抽象名词语境词源法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 对比手法

    P1

    文章开篇就用 once thought to be unique to humans 和 newborn ducklings 形成强烈的 contrast,将人类独有的 abstract intelligent thought 与被视为 unintelligent 的小鸭子并置。这种 juxtaposition 立刻 challenge 了读者的 assumption,为揭示动物智能这一 main thesis 制造了 dramatic tension。通过把 human cognition 和 duckling behavior 放在同一 conceptual level 上比较,文章有力地 support 了其核心观点——abstract reasoning 比我们想象的更 widespread。

    信号词 once thought previously believed traditionally considered long assumed however but yet in contrast on the contrary whereas

    仿写: 当你要 present 一个 surprising finding 时,可以先 establish 一个 conventional belief,然后用 however/but/yet 等 transitional words 引出 contradictory evidence。模版可以是:'X, once thought/believed/considered to be [conventional view], is now shown/revealed/found to be [surprising reality] in [unexpected subject].' 这样的 structure 能让你的 opening 充满 drama 和 intrigue。

  • 引语运用

    P2 P3 P8 P9 P11 P12

    文章多次 quote 了 Edward Wasserman 和其他 experts 的 direct speech,特别是 Wasserman 的 'birds are extremely intelligent' 和 'our problem pretty much lies in figuring out how to get them to talk to us' 这样的 vivid expressions。这些 quotations 不仅 add credibility 到研究发现,更重要的是用 authoritative voices 来 reinforce 文章的 central argument。尤其是最后一段的 quote 'animals process and appreciate far more of the intricacies in their world than we've ever understood',直接 echo 了文章的 main thesis,给读者留下 lasting impression。

    信号词 said noted explained stated commented remarked according to as [name] put it in [name]'s words

    仿写: 当你要 support 一个 scientific claim 时,strategically select quotes 那些既有 expertise 又能用 accessible language 表达的 experts。避免选择过于 technical 的 quotes,而是要找那些能 capture 研究 significance 且 resonate with general audience 的 statements。模版:'[Expert name], [title/affiliation], said/noted/explained: "[impactful statement]".' 记得在文中 balance direct quotes 和你自己的 narrative,让 expert voices serve as strategic reinforcement 而不是 dominate 整篇文章。

  • 数据引用

    P5 P6

    文章在 第6段 中 precisely present 了 '70% of the ducklings preferred to move toward' 这个 quantitative finding,并用 concrete example 配合数字——two green spheres vs blue spheres vs mismatched orange and purple spheres。这个 specific percentage 不仅 add scientific rigor 到 claim,更让 abstract concept 变得 tangible 和 convincing。通过把 statistical data 和 visual imagery 结合,文章让读者能 clearly grasp 实验结果的 significance,为后续关于 abstract reasoning ability 的 broader conclusion 提供 solid foundation。

    信号词 70% about approximately roughly nearly over more than less than showed that found that revealed that

    仿写: 当你要 report research findings 时,选择那些 most telling 的 statistics 而不是 overwhelm 读者 with all numbers。理想的做法是 combine percentage/ratio 和 concrete example,让 abstract data 变得 relatable。模版:'About/approximately [X]% of [subjects] showed/demonstrated/preferred [behavior/outcome]. For instance/in other words, [具体例子].' 记住要用 rounded numbers (如70%而非69.7%) 来保持 readability,除非 precision 对理解特别 critical。

  • 背景交代

    P7

    文章在 第7段 中 strategically insert 了关于 imprinting 的 background information,解释这是 ducklings 在 shortly after birth 经历的 rapid learning process。这个 contextual detail 不是 random digression,而是 crucial for understanding 为什么这个实验 design 能 effectively test abstract reasoning。通过 establish 这个 biological foundation,作者帮助读者 connect 实验结果和 duckling's natural behavior,让 subsequent interpretation (第8段关于用 abstract relationships 识别母亲) 显得 logical 和 well-grounded。

    信号词 —it's what — this is which means in other words that is specifically to put it simply essentially

    仿写: 当你的 main content 涉及 specialized concepts 时,要 anticipate 读者可能的 knowledge gaps 并 proactively address 它们。理想的 placement 是在 present main finding 之前或紧接着。模版:'[Subject] goes through/undergoes/experiences [process/phenomenon]—it's what allows/enables them to [function/purpose].' 使用 em dash 或 semicolon 能让 explanatory clause 自然地 integrate into narrative flow。Keep it concise—一两句话就足够,不要 turn it into a lengthy tutorial。

  • 客观描述

    P4 P5 P6

    文章在 第4段-6 中 meticulously describe 了实验的 procedure,使用 neutral、factual language 如 'took 1-day-old ducklings'、'exposed them to'、'the researchers found'。这种 detached、observational tone 让 reporting 显得 unbiased 和 credible。作者 avoid 使用 emotional 或 evaluative language,而是 let the data speak for itself。这种 objective presentation 是 science journalism 的 hallmark,它 establish 作者作为 neutral observer 而非 advocate 的 position,从而增强读者对 findings 的 trust。

    信号词 the researchers the study the findings found that showed that indicated that revealed that took exposed tested

    仿写: 当 describe scientific procedures 或 findings 时,坚持用 factual verbs 如 took/exposed/found/showed,避免 interpretive verbs 如 proved/demonstrated conclusively/revealed the truth。Use third-person references (the researchers、the study、the findings) 而非 first-person。模版:'The researchers [action verb] [具体操作]. The results showed/indicated/suggested that [finding].' 记住要 separate description of what was done 和 interpretation of what it means——先 present facts objectively,然后可以 add expert interpretation through quotes。

  • 设问引导

    P3 P4

    虽然文章没有 explicit question marks,但 第3段 中 Wasserman 的 quote 'our problem pretty much lies in figuring out how to get them to talk to us' 本质上是一个 implied question——我们如何 measure bird intelligence? 这个 rhetorical framing 不仅 acknowledge 研究的 inherent challenge,更 guide 读者去 appreciate 后续 experimental design 的 ingenuity。通过 present 这个 methodological puzzle,文章 set up 对 第4段 中 'clever experiment' 的 anticipation,让读者 actively engage with 内容而非 passively receive information。

    信号词 figuring out how to the challenge lies in the problem is the question remains how to whether to what extent determining understanding

    仿写: 当你要 introduce 研究时,可以先 present the challenge 或 puzzle 它要 address,即使不用 question format。模版:'The challenge/problem/question lies in [identifying the obstacle]. To address this, [researchers的approach].' 或者用 'figuring out/determining/understanding how to' 这样的 infinitive structures 来 embed questions into statements。这样能 create narrative tension 并让后续的 solution 显得更 satisfying 和 significant。Remember,goal 不是 literally ask questions,而是 frame content 让读者 mentally engage with the problem。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 传统观念对鸟类智力的低估

    P2
    challenges our idea of what it means to have a birdbrain

    委婉表达 birdbrain so-called supposedly allegedly what we think of as conventional wisdom traditional view

    这个 implicature 的核心在于,作者通过 'birdbrain' 这个 derogatory term 来 highlight 人类对 avian intelligence 的 long-standing prejudice。言外之意是:我们一直 underestimate 鸟类的 cognitive abilities,而这项研究 fundamentally challenges 这种 misconception。对文章主旨的作用是 reinforce 研究的 significance,强调这不仅是个 scientific discovery,更是对人类 anthropocentric bias 的 correction。它为后续 Wasserman 教授关于 'birds are extremely intelligent' 的评论 pave the way,共同构建了 'we need to revise our understanding' 这个 central message。

  • 人类认知能力的局限性

    P3
    In fact, birds are extremely intelligent and our problem pretty much lies in figuring out how to get them to 'talk' to us

    转折类 our problem in fact actually the reality is on the contrary rather instead

    Wasserman 教授的这句话 convey 了深层 implicature:鸟类的 apparent lack of intelligence 实际上是个 methodological problem 而非 cognitive deficit。言外之意是人类一直用 inappropriate standards 来 judge 动物智力,就像用 human language 作为 intelligence 的 sole criterion。对主旨的作用是 expand 文章的 critical dimension,从单纯的 scientific finding 提升到对 research methodology 和 anthropocentric worldview 的 reflection。它 echo 了开头关于 'once thought to be unique to humans' 的观点,形成 thematic coherence,强化 'we need new approaches to understand animal minds' 这个 broader implication。

  • 以往研究的方法论缺陷

    P10
    other animals, including pigeons, dolphins, honeybees and some primates, can discern same from different, but only after extensive training

    让步转折类 but only after extensive training but only however only yet only though only but merely only after

    这句话的 implicature 非常关键:虽然其他动物也能 demonstrate 这种 same-different discrimination,但需要 extensive training 这个前提 fundamentally changes 其 nature。言外之意是这些动物的能力是 acquired through conditioning 而非 innate cognitive capacity。与之形成 sharp contrast 的是 newborn ducklings 的 untrained performance,这正是本研究的 revolutionary aspect。对主旨的作用是通过 comparison 来 amplify 研究发现的 significance:小鸭子的 innate ability 证明这种 abstract reasoning 是 evolutionary hardwired 而非 learned behavior,从而 support 'far more necessary to survival' 这个核心论点。这个 implicature 也 explain 为什么研究者特别 emphasize 'without training' 这个 condition。

  • 科学认知的范式转变

    P12
    We are in a revolutionary phase in terms of our ability to understand the minds of other animals

    情态词强化类 revolutionary phase revolutionary groundbreaking unprecedented radical shift fundamental change transformative

    Wasserman 教授用 'revolutionary phase' 这个 phrase 传达的 implicature 远超字面意思。言外之意是:我们正在 witness 科学史上的 paradigm shift,类似于 Copernican revolution 或 Darwinian evolution 那样 fundamental。这不仅仅是关于小鸭子的 single study,而是整个 comparative cognition field 正在 undergo 的 conceptual revolution。对主旨的作用是将文章从 specific research finding 提升到 broader intellectual movement,呼应开头的 'once thought to be unique to humans' 这个 assumption 正在被 systematically dismantled。它给读者传递的 ultimate message 是:我们需要 fundamentally rethink 人类在 cognitive hierarchy 中的 position,以及 animal minds 的 complexity。这个 implicature 为整篇文章提供了 grand narrative,将科学发现置于 larger philosophical context。

  • 实验设计的创新性

    P4
    devised a clever experiment to better test bird intelligence

    评价性形容词类 clever experiment clever ingenious elegant innovative novel approach sophisticated

    用 'clever experiment' 来描述研究方法传达了 subtle implicature:之前测试 bird intelligence 的方法存在 fundamental flaws,而这个新设计 successfully addresses 那些问题。言外之意在于,研究者不仅发现了 what(小鸭子有这种能力),更重要的是 how to reveal it(通过 imprinting 的 natural process 而非 training)。对主旨的作用是 highlight 研究的 methodological innovation,这解释了为什么这个发现是 'first time' 证明 without training 的能力。它也 connect to Wasserman 教授在 第3段 说的 'figuring out how to get them to talk to us',呼应了 methodological breakthrough 对于 understanding animal intelligence 的 crucial importance。这个 implicature 强化了文章的 meta-message:有时问题不在于动物 lack abilities,而在于我们 lack appropriate methods。

  • 能力的进化必要性

    P11
    is far more necessary to a wider variety of animals' survival than we previously thought

    程度强化类 far more necessary far more much more significantly more considerably more way more vastly more

    Martinho 博士这句话的 implicature 触及文章的 evolutionary dimension:abstract reasoning 不是 human uniqueness 或 higher primates 的 exclusive domain,而是 widespread 且 fundamental 的 survival mechanism。言外之意是,如果连 newborn ducklings 都 possess 这种能力,那说明它在 phylogenetic tree 上的 distribution 比想象中 much broader,可能是 ancient evolutionary innovation。对主旨的作用是提供 theoretical explanation for empirical findings:为什么小鸭子 without training 就能做到?因为 natural selection 已经将这种能力 hardwired into 许多物种的 neural architecture。这个 implicature 将研究发现与 evolutionary biology 的 big questions 连接起来,suggest 我们需要 rethink animal cognition 在 evolutionary history 中的 origins and distribution,从而给文章增添 profound theoretical depth。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Enthusiastic and optimistic about the discovery)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 首段转折对比 P1

    新闻报道中的 opening contrast 常常 reveal 作者的立场 stance。如果作者用 once thought 描述旧观点,然后用 however 引出新研究,这个 rhetorical pattern 暗示作者倾向于 embrace 新发现而非 defend 旧观点。

  2. 专家引语倾向 P2 P3 P9 P12

    在 scientific news 中,记者通常会 cite experts 来增加 credibility。但关键在于这些 experts 说了什么。如果 quoted experts 用 'challenges our idea'、'extremely intelligent' 这类 enthusiastic terms,而作者 extensively quotes 这些观点,说明作者 align with 这种 positive assessment。

  3. 新闻报道的 space allocation 反映 editorial judgment。这篇文章用 multiple paragraphs 详细描述实验 design、results、和 broader implications,却没有专门段落讨论 potential flaws 或 criticisms。这种 asymmetric treatment 表明作者想让读者 appreciate 而非 question 这个研究。

  4. 结尾语气强度 P11 P12

    结论段的 language intensity 是 attitude 的 crystallization。作者用 'revolutionary phase' 和 'far more...than we previously thought' 这种 superlative expressions,已经超越了 neutral reporting 的范畴。这种 amplified language 表明作者不只是 reporting,而是在 celebrate 这个发现。

  5. 单个 signal 可能是 neutral reporting 的一部分,但当 structural positioning、quotation selection、space allocation、和 language intensity 都指向同一方向时,就形成了 cumulative evidence of author's attitude。这种 multi-layered consistency 是区分 balanced reporting 和 supportive reporting 的关键。

文中的态度信号词

  • challenges P2

    这个 verb 表明研究对现有观念 existing notions 形成了 challenge,在新闻报道中,作者选择用 'challenges' 而非 'conflicts with' 或 'contradicts',暗示这种 challenge 是 constructive 和 valuable 的。Challenge 有 positive connotation,意味着 push boundaries 而非简单 oppose。

    同类词 revolutionizes transforms redefines overturns reshapes

  • extremely intelligent P3

    这是 expert quote 中的 intensified praise,用 'extremely' 这个 amplifier 来 emphasize 鸟类的 intelligence。作者选择 quote 这句话并 prominently display 它,显示作者想让读者 appreciate 而非 question 鸟类的 cognitive abilities。

    同类词 remarkably smart surprisingly sophisticated exceptionally capable impressively advanced extraordinarily gifted

  • clever experiment P4

    用 'clever' 来 describe 实验 design 是 explicit positive evaluation。在 objective reporting 中,作者会说 'the researchers designed an experiment',但这里用 'clever' 表明作者 admire 研究方法的 ingenuity,这超越了 neutral description。

    同类词 ingenious design innovative approach elegant methodology brilliant strategy sophisticated technique

  • for the first time P9

    这个 phrase 强调研究的 novelty 和 significance,把它 frame 为 breakthrough。在新闻报道中,'for the first time' 是 highlight 研究 importance 的标准方式,作者用它来 signal 这是 major advance 而非 incremental progress。

    同类词 unprecedented groundbreaking pioneering novel breakthrough

  • far more necessary P11

    这个 comparative structure 用 'far more...than we previously thought' 来 emphasize 发现的 broader implications。'Far' 是 degree intensifier,把 discovery 的 scope 扩展到 'a wider variety of animals',显示作者认为这个研究 fundamentally changes 我们对 animal cognition 的理解。

    同类词 much more important significantly more crucial vastly more essential considerably more vital

  • revolutionary P12

    在 concluding paragraph 用 'revolutionary' 这个 strongest possible praise 来 characterize 当前的研究 phase,这是 author's attitude 的 climax。Revolutionary 意味着 fundamental change in perspective,远超 'interesting' 或 'important'。

    同类词 transformative paradigm-shifting game-changing groundbreaking epoch-making

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇新闻报道

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇新闻报道?

  1. 首段呈现研究发现 P1

    新闻报道的首段必然 presents factual information about an event 或 discovery,而议论文会 state an argument 或 viewpoint,说明文则会 introduce a concept 或 phenomenon 需要解释。这篇文章开头就说 'A new study has shown',这是在 reporting a research event,不是 arguing a position,也不是 explaining how something works。

  2. 频繁引用专家观点 P2 P3 P8 P9 P11 P12

    议论文的作者会直接 express their views 而不需要 cite external sources for every claim,说明文的作者会 explain concepts 基于 general knowledge。但新闻报道必须 attribute information to specific sources,因为记者不是 creating opinions,而是 reporting what others said or found。这篇文章里 第2段 有 'said Edward Wasserman',第8段 有 'said Dr. Kacelnik',这些都是典型的 journalistic attribution。

  3. 描述实验过程细节 P4 P5 P6

    议论文不需要详细的 experimental details,只需要 examples 来 support arguments。说明文可能会有 process description,但目的是 teaching how something works,而不是 reporting what researchers did。这篇文章的 第4段 到 第6段 详细描述了 the experiment design:'took 1-day-old ducklings'、'exposed them to a pair of moving objects'、'found that 70% preferred',这是在 objectively reporting the study,不是在 arguing 或 explaining a general concept。

  4. 倒金字塔信息结构 P1 P2 P7 P10 P11 P12

    这篇文章开头就给出 the key finding(ducklings can do same-different discrimination),然后 第2段 提供 publication details 和 expert commentary,中间段落 explain the methodology,后面段落 provide broader context(other animals)和 significance。这是标准的 news structure:lead → source → details → context → significance。议论文会是 thesis → arguments → counterarguments → conclusion,说明文会是 definition → components → process → examples。

  5. 新闻报道的核心是 objectivity 和 factuality,它必须让 readers 看到 what happened 和 who said what,而不是 what the writer thinks。议论文的核心是 persuasion,作者要 convince you of a viewpoint。说明文的核心是 clarification,作者要 make you understand a concept。这三种 writing purposes 决定了它们完全不同的 structural patterns 和 linguistic features。通过快速检查这三个 checkpoints,你能在 1 分钟内准确判断 genre。

哪些词暴露了新闻报道体裁?

  • A new study P1 核心事实概括词 The study the new paper this study Previous studies These findings
  • published Thursday in Science P2 新闻来源与引用词 said Edward Wasserman he said said Dr. Kacelnik said Jeffrey Katz Dr. Martinho said
  • Thursday P2 即时性时间与地点词 1-day-old ducklings newborn ducklings shortly after birth for the first time
  • challenges our idea P2 核心事实概括词 has shown that suggest that have shown for the first time have suggested that It's clear from this study
  • Edward Wasserman, an experimental psychologist at the University of Iowa P2 新闻来源与引用词 Antone Martinho and Alex Kacelnik, co-authors Dr. Kacelnik Jeffrey Katz, an experimental psychologist at Auburn University Dr. Martinho Dr. Wasserman
  • who wrote an independent review of the study P2 新闻来源与引用词 who wrote an independent review who was not involved in the study co-authors of the new paper
  • devised a clever experiment P4 核心事实概括词 The researchers found exposed them to they took Then they exposed
  • The researchers found that P6 核心事实概括词 These findings suggest have shown for the first time Previous studies have suggested It's clear from this study
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

9 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 的常见问题

2023年3月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章 Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 的原文出自哪里?
New York Times《纽约时报》2016.07.14文章Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color(相同找相同,相异找相异,新生的小鸭子也能区辨形状和颜色的异同)。
2023年3月英语六级真题第1套文章 Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 的主旨是什么?
《科学》杂志发表的一项新研究表明,刚出生的小鸭无需训练就能区分相同和不同的概念,这挑战了以往对动物智力的假设。这种曾被认为是人类独有的能力表明,抽象推理比我们之前认为的更加普遍,且对动物生存至关重要。(英文表述:A new study published in Science reveals that newborn ducklings can distinguish between same and different concepts without training, challenging previous assumptions about animal intelligence. This ability, once thought unique to humans, suggests abstract reasoning is more widespread and crucial for animal survival than previously believed.)
Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color(2023年3月英语六级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为新闻报道,作者立场是积极支持(Enthusiastic and optimistic about the discovery)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 446 词、12 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2023年3月英语六级真题第1套文章 Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 12 段按新闻报道骨架分为 5 个意群:第1段——研究发现引入;第2段、第3段——研究权威性确立;第4段、第5段、第6段——实验方法阐述;第7段、第8段——机制解释深化;第9段、第10段、第11段、第12段——研究意义评价。
Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Enthusiastic and optimistic about the discovery)。判断路径:首段转折对比 → 专家引语倾向 → 篇幅分配倾向 → 结尾语气强度 → 多维信号汇聚;文中的态度信号词包括 challenges(第2段)、extremely intelligent(第3段)、clever experiment(第4段)、for the first time(第9段)、far more necessary(第11段)、revolutionary(第12段)。
2023年3月英语六级真题第1套文章 Duck,Duck,Goose,Goose.Newborn Ducklings Judge Shapes and Color 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:inference(推断;推理)、cornerstone(基石;基础)、imprinting(印记;印刻)、discern(辨别;识别)、intricacy(复杂性;错综复杂之处),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: