英语六级 2025年12月·第3套 Part III Section C (2) 阅读理解(四选一)试卷排版
英语六级2025年12月·第3套 Part III Section C (2) 阅读理解(四选一):共 5 题、占整卷 20%(710 分制折算约 142 分)、卷面选文共 451 个英文单词。本页按真题原卷版式还原该模块卷面(不含解析);逐题解析在「题目解析」页,全文逐句精读在「原文精读」页;本模块真题可免费下载 PDF/Word,入口见上方本题行。
试卷原卷
真题卷第3套(2025-12) • 英语六级
Part III Section C (2)
Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A) , B) , C) and D) . You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.
Passage Two
Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage.
The other day I had to log into a service I hadn't used before. Since I was a new user, the website decided that it needed to check I wasn't a robot and so set me a Captcha test to determine whether the user is a person or a machine.
I was presented with an image of a roadside scene over which was laid a grid. My "challenge" was to click on each cell in the grid that contained a traffic sign. I did so, a bit irritated. Then I was presented with another image and another grid — also with a request to identify road signs. Like a lamb, I complied, after which the website accepted my input.
And then I realised what I had been doing was adding to a dataset for training the machine-learning software that guides self-driving cars. So, to gain access to an automated service that will benefit financially from my input, I first have to do some unpaid labor to help improve the performance of autonomous vehicles.
Neat, eh? But note also the delicious additional irony that the Captcha is described as an "automated Turing test". The Turing test was conceived, you may recall, as a way of enabling humans to determine whether a machine could respond in such a way that one couldn't tell whether it was a human or a robot. So we have wandered into a world in which machines make us do tricks to prove that we are humans!
The strangest aspect of this unparalleled shift is how under-discussed it has been. The metaphor of the boiling frog comes to mind. Have we become so subtly conditioned by digital technology that we don't see what's been happening to us? Have we been conditioned to accept a world governed by "smart" tech, trading convenience to the point where we become a bit like machines ourselves?
In a recent startling and thoughtful book, two scholars — Brett Frischmann, a law professor, and Evan Selinger, a philosopher — argue that the answer to that question is "yes".
And they're right. There's nothing technophobic(技术恐惧的) about that. We shape our tools and then our tools shape us. Technology is supposed to provide tools that serve human ends. But, as the machine-learning Captcha demonstrates, a significant proportion of digital tech now sees (and uses) humans as means to ends that are not ours. In the process, they reduce us to the status of cheery rats running on treadmills(踏车) designed by people who do not have our interests at heart. So back to the frog metaphor. Are we smart enough to jump out before it's too late? You don't even have to Google it to know the answer.
51.
How did the author respond to the Captcha test?
A)He clicked on the cells randomly.
B)He accepted the challenge readily.
C)He completed it confidently.
D)He worked on it submissively.
52.
What is ironic about the Captcha test?
A)A machine can respond to the test as well as humans do.
B)A machine can outperform humans in object identification.
C)A test designed to test machines is now used by machines to test humans.
D)A test conceived to tell a human from a robot can now do tricks humans can't.
53.
Why does the author use the metaphor of the boiling frog?
A)To show that humans are unwilling to trade convenience for control by smart tech.
B)To show that humans are unaware of the potential danger brought by smart tech.
C)To question whether humans are conditioned to accept digital tech.
D)To question whether humans are as vulnerable as the boiling frog.
54.
Why does the author think that Brett Frischmann and Evan Selinger are right?
A)A large part of digital tech is now making use of humans to meet its own ends.
B)Humans are now fast locked in a race against digital tech to control the world.
C)Digital tech can serve human needs in ways previously thought impossible.
D)Digital tech is now doing thinking while humans are doing repetitive work.
55.
What does the author imply by asking "Are we smart enough to jump out before it's too late?" at the end of the passage?
A)It is not sensible to expect digital tech to take humans' interest to heart.
B)It is hard to say whether technology or humans will get the upper hand.
C)We may have to search the web to get the answer to the question.
D)We may not awake in time to the danger digital tech poses to us.
选文出处:本文选自2018年11月18日刊登在 theguardian.com(卫报/观察家报专栏)上的一篇由 John Naughton 撰写、标题为“Computers have learned to make us jump through hoops”(《计算机已学会让我们钻圈子》)的文章。