考研英语一 2026年 Section II Part A (4) 阅读理解(四选一)试卷排版
考研英语一2026年 Section II Part A (4) 阅读理解(四选一):共 5 题、卷面 40 分(满分 100,每题 2 分)、卷面选文共 445 个英文单词。本页按真题原卷版式还原该模块卷面(不含解析);逐题解析在「题目解析」页,全文逐句精读在「原文精读」页;本模块真题可免费下载 PDF/Word,入口见上方本题行。
试卷原卷
英语一真题(2026)
Section II Part A (4)
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)
Text 4
When Tom Swetnam joined the U.S. Forest Service in the 1970s, his mandate was to "put everything out," he recalled. But when Swetnam enrolled in graduate school at the University of Arizona's Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, he was surprised to find a record of repeated blazes dating back hundreds of years before European colonists arrived on the continent. Some of the trees he analyzed bore more than 20 fire scars among their rings.
The fact that fires happened so often meant they couldn't have been severe enough to kill most trees. Instead, a growing body of research showed that frequent, low-severity fires made many ecosystems healthier. They rid the forest of dead and sick trees, reducing competition and curbing the spread of disease. Because flammable material couldn't build up on the landscape, blazes tended to move slowly and peter out when they reached the footprints of previous burns.
In 2022, Swetnam and other scientists teamed up to compile a database of fire-scarred trees from across the continent. Their North American tree-ring fire-scar network (NAFSN) provided the basis for a study published last month. In the study, the researchers compared the historical fire cadence with the wildfires recorded over the past few decades, and uncovered a striking shortfall. The NAFSN sites experienced less than a quarter of the number of fires that would have been expected without fire suppression.
This deficit is a testament to the effectiveness of modern firefighting, said Kelly Martin, a past president of the International Association of Wildland Fire. "Yet the combined consequences of suppression and climate change have eroded humanity's ability to suppress fires, particularly those that ignite under the most dangerous weather conditions."
To prevent entire ecosystems from going up in smoke, Martin said, people must bring healthy fire back to places that need it. At Yosemite National Park, Martin oversaw the use of what is known as prescribed burns to make the landscape more resilient. These fires were carefully planned and intentionally ignited during periods when weather kept the blazes easy to control, and helped eliminate some of the fuel that had built up around the important park's facilities. Research shows that these prescribed burns make subsequent wildfires less severe, even if later fires happen under the most dangerous weather conditions.
Yet even as scientists and public officials increasingly agree on the need for more fires in our forests, climate change is making this tactic more challenging, experts said. "It's a double-edged sword because wildfires are getting more severe and larger under climate change and we need this work even more, but then the work gets more challenging," said Susan Prichard, a fire ecologist at the University of Washington.
36.
According to Paragraph 1, Swetnam was surprised by ____
[ A ]the scarcity of tree-ring research in the U.S.
[ B ]the firefighting measures in ancient Europe.
[ C ]the forest management practices in the 1970s.
[ D ]the number of wildfires in precolonial times.
37.
Paragraph 2 mainly focuses on ____
[ A ]the causes of previous burns.
[ B ]the treatment of diseased trees.
[ C ]the benefits of low-severity fires.
[ D ]the importance of forest ecosystems.
38.
What did the study find about the wildfires over the past few decades?
[ A ]Their intensity has vastly fluctuated.
[ B ]Their frequency has markedly decreased.
[ C ]Their threats have been underestimated.
[ D ]Their records have been misinterpreted.
39.
What can be inferred about modern firefighting?
[ A ]Its workforce needs more training.
[ B ]Its effectiveness is questioned by the public.
[ C ]It may render traditional tactics useless.
[ D ]It may make severe fires harder to put out.
40.
Both Martin and Prichard would agree that ____
[ A ]it is challenging to predict large wildfires.
[ B ]it is urgent to assess the use of planned fires.
[ C ]it is necessary to introduce prescribed burns.
[ D ]it is rewarding to double fire detection efforts.
选文出处:本文选自2025年3月11日刊登在 washingtonpost.com(美国《华盛顿邮报》)上的一篇由 Sarah Kaplan 撰写、标题为“What old trees can teach us about modern wildfires”(《古树能教给我们哪些关于现代野火的道理》)的文章。