-
作者用了大量的 specific numbers 来 illustrate fish consumption 的 dramatic changes。比如 20 kilograms per person 这个 figure 直接显示了 current consumption level,而 twice what it was in the 1960s 这个 comparison 让读者立刻 grasp 增长的 magnitude。再看 73 million tonnes 和 167 million tonnes 这些 precise data,它们不仅 demonstrate aquaculture 的 scale,更重要的是通过 quantifiable evidence 来 support 文章的 central argument:养殖已经 surpass 野生捕捞。这种 numeric precision 让 abstract concept 变得 concrete and convincing。
信号词
around more than per million tonnes % times estimated
仿写: 在写 expository essays 时,你可以问自己:这个 phenomenon 能用什么 specific metrics 来 quantify?比如写 environmental issues,不要只说 pollution is serious,而要说 PM2.5 levels reached 150 μg/m³,exceeding safe limits by 300%。模版可以这样构建:【Topic】has reached/accounts for【具体数字+单位】,which is【倍数/百分比】compared to【对比时间/对象】。记住,numbers 要 serve your purpose,不是 random statistics,而是 strategically selected data 来 illuminate your key points。
-
文章通过 systematic comparisons 来 reveal the shift from wild fishing to aquaculture。最 striking 的对比是 farmed fish versus wild-caught fish 这条 main thread,贯穿全文。第2段 用 for the first time in human history 这个 dramatic statement 来 emphasize historical significance。第5段 把 1974 年的 10% overfished stocks 和 now 的 more than three-tenths 进行 temporal comparison,visually demonstrating deterioration。第7段 的 beef versus carp comparison 尤其 effective:pound for pound, beef requires 15 times more feed,这个 stark contrast 不仅 highlights aquaculture's efficiency,更 connects to broader themes of sustainability。这些 comparisons 共同 construct 一个 compelling narrative about resource allocation。
信号词
rather than versus compared to more than less than while whereas instead of unlike in contrast on the other hand
仿写: 运用 comparison 时,要 establish clear criteria for comparison。问自己:我要比较什么 aspects?Time periods、methods、quantities 还是 outcomes?构建时可以用 whereas/while 这样的 contrastive conjunctions。模版示例:Unlike【对象A】which requires【特征A】,【对象B】only needs【特征B】,making it【结论】。或者 temporal pattern:Back in【过去时间】,【情况A】;now,【情况B】。记住 comparison 要 serve your thesis,不是为了 compare 而 compare,而是通过 contrast 来 illuminate your central argument。
-
文章通过 concrete examples 来 ground abstract claims。第6段 提到 China produces 60% of farmed fish 这个 specific case,它不仅是 statistic,更是 exemplifying the global leader in aquaculture。然后 35 countries including China 这个 expansion 展示了 trend 的 widespread nature。第7段 的 salmon on your plate 是个 relatable example,把 food security 这个 macro concept 具象化为 everyday experience。Beef versus carp 不只是 comparison,也是 concrete illustration of resource efficiency。第8段 的 shrimp farming in Southeast Asian countries 作为 negative example,demonstrates aquaculture's potential downsides。这些 examples 把 theoretical discussions 转化为 tangible scenarios,让 readers 能 visualize and relate to the issues。
信号词
for example for instance such as including like take...as an example to illustrate namely in particular
仿写: 选择 examples 时要考虑 representativeness and relevance。问自己:这个 example 能否 effectively illustrate my point?Is it specific enough to be vivid yet general enough to be applicable?构建时可以用 For example、such as、including 这样的 introductory phrases。模版:【General statement】. For instance,【具体例子】demonstrates/illustrates【如何体现观点】。或者更 integrated:【Claim】,as seen in【例子】,where【具体情况】。Remember,examples 应该 serve your argument,不是 random anecdotes,而是 carefully selected instances that strengthen your thesis。
-
文章在 第2段 给出了 defining statement:for the first time in human history, most of our aquatic food now comes from farming rather than fishing。这个 definition 不是 dictionary-style 的 rigid explanation,而是 contextual clarification,界定了 current state of aquatic food sourcing。括号里的 aquatic(水产的) 也是 definitional device,providing Chinese equivalent 来 ensure comprehension。这种 defining 对文章 crucial,因为它 establishes the fundamental premise:我们已经进入了 aquaculture-dominated era。Without this clear definition of the situation,后续的 all arguments about sustainability and food security 就会 lack foundation。
信号词
is means refers to defined as is known as called termed in other words that is
仿写: 写 definitions 时要考虑 your audience's knowledge level。问自己:这个 term 需要 how much explanation?对于 technical terms,可以用 parenthetical definitions 像文中的 aquatic(水产的)。对于 complex concepts,可以用 descriptive definitions:【Term】refers to【核心特征】,which means【进一步解释】。模版:【Term】is/means【本质属性】that【功能/特征】。或者 contextual definition:In this context,【term】describes【具体所指】。Remember,good definitions 要 precise yet accessible,避免 circular reasoning,并且 fit naturally into text flow。
-
文章在 第3段 对 fish supply 进行了 systematic categorization:total 167 million tonnes 被分为 consumed by humans(73 million farmed fish + wild-caught) 和 other uses(animal feed and medical products 约 20 million)。这个 classification 不仅 organizes information,更重要的是 reveals the structure of fish industry。通过这种 breakdown,readers 能 understand 不是所有 fish 都进入 human diet,还有 significant portion 用于 other purposes。这种 categorical thinking 帮助 establish 后续讨论 sustainability 的 framework,因为它 shows different demand streams that need to be met。
信号词
divided into consists of categorized as types of kinds of classified into falls into can be grouped into includes
仿写: 进行 classification 时要确保 categories 是 mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive。问自己:我的 classification criteria 是什么?Categories 之间有没有 overlap?构建时可以用 division markers:【Total】can be divided into【类别A】and【类别B】。模版:【整体】consists of【类别1】,【类别2】,and【类别3】,where【各自特点】。或者用 proportional language:Of the total【数量】,【X%】goes to【用途A】,while the remaining【Y%】is used for【用途B】。Remember,good classification 要有 clear logic,categories 应该 based on meaningful distinctions that serve your analytical purpose。
-
文章在 第7段 引用了 future projection:By 2050, the world will need to feed an estimated 9.7 billion people。虽然没有 explicit citation,但 estimated 这个词 indicates 这是 sourced from authoritative demographic projections。这个 reference to external data 不仅 adds credibility,更重要的是 establishes the urgency of the issue。通过 citing this widely-accepted future scenario,作者 creates a compelling context for why aquaculture matters。这种 use of established data 让 argument 不再是 personal opinion,而是 response to recognized global challenges,从而 significantly strengthens persuasive power。
信号词
according to research shows studies indicate experts suggest estimated reported predicted data reveals statistics show
仿写: 使用 references 时要 strategically select authoritative and relevant sources。问自己:这个 data 的 source 可靠吗?Does it directly support my point?即使没有 formal citation,也可以用 hedging language 像 estimated、according to research、studies show 来 indicate sourced information。模版:According to【来源/研究】,【引用内容】,which suggests/indicates【与论点的关系】。或者 integrated reference:【Claim】,as【来源】predicts/reports/shows。Remember,引用要 seamless,不是 interrupt your flow,而是 naturally reinforce your argument。