2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (1) The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking
CET-6 · 来自 2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 · Part III Section C (1) · 阅读理解(四选一)

The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking

2016年12月英语六级真题第3套文章逐层精读

The Guardian《卫报》2015.01.22 文章The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking(《卫报》观点之香烟包装:熏出保守党思想)。

本页是 2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 444 词、6 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「消极批判」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

6 段英文原文

以下为2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (1) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 6 段。左侧 P1–P6 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking

Any veteran nicotine addict will testify that fancy packaging plays no role in the decision to keep smoking. So, it is argued, stripping cartons of their branding will trigger no mass movement to quit.

But that isn't why the government—under pressure from cancer charities, health workers and the Labour party—has agreed to legislate for standardised packaging. The theory is that smoking should be stripped of any appeal to discourage new generations from starting in the first place. Plain packaging would be another step in the reclassification of cigarettes from inviting consumer products to narcotics(麻醉剂).

Naturally, the tobacco industry is violently opposed. No business likes to admit that it sells addictive poison as a lifestyle choice. That is why government has historically intervened, banning advertising, imposing health warnings and punitive(惩罚性的) duties. This approach has led over time to a fall in smoking with numbers having roughly halved since the 1970s. Evidence from Australia suggests plain packaging pushes society further along that road. Since tobacco is one of the biggest causes of premature death in the UK, a measure that tames the habit even by a fraction is worth trying.

So why has it taken so long? The Department of Health declared its intention to consider the move in November 2010 and consulted through 2012. But the plan was suspended in July 2013. It did not escape notice that a lobbying firm set up by Lynton Crosby, David Cameron's election campaign director, had previously acted for Philip Morris International. (The prime minister denied there was a connection between his new adviser's outside interests and the change in legislative programme.) In November 2013, after an unnecessary round of additional consultation, health minister Jane Ellison said the government was minded to proceed after all. Now we are told Members of Parliament (MPs) will have a free vote before parliament is dissolved in March.

Parliament has in fact already authorised the government to tame the tobacco trade. MPs voted overwhelmingly in favour of Labour amendments to the children and families bill last February that included the power to regulate for plain packaging. With sufficient will in Downing Street this would have been done already. But strength of will is the missing ingredient where Mr. Cameron and public health are concerned. His attitude to state intervention has looked confused ever since his bizarre 2006 lament(叹惜) that chocolate oranges placed seductively at supermarket checkouts fueled obesity.

The government has moved reluctantly into a sensible public health policy, but with such obvious over-cautiousness that any political credit due belongs to the opposition. Without sustained external pressure it seems certain Mr. Cameron would still be hooked on the interests of big tobacco companies.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

6 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Objection from Addicted Smokers

    A common objection is that plain packaging will not make established smokers quit.

    本段通过提出“无法促使老烟民戒烟”这一表面上有力的 criticism,建立了文章的争论起点。它服务于全文主旨的方式是:让作者随后说明政府推行该政策的真正目标并非治疗 existing addiction,而是预防新的吸烟者产生。

    先辨认反方声音
  2. P2

    The Preventive Logic of Plain Packaging

    Plain packaging is intended to prevent smoking initiation by removing cigarettes' appeal.

    本段是全文支持 plain packaging 的理论基础,也是对第一段反对意见的直接回应。它证明该措施具有明确的 public health purpose,从而为后文论证其有效性、批评政府拖延奠定了价值前提。

    抓住转折后的真正目标
  3. P3

    The Case for Stronger Tobacco Control

    Evidence and public health concerns justify plain packaging despite tobacco industry opposition.

    本段为作者的立场提供最实质的 empirical support,表明政策不只是道德姿态,而是已有证据支持的有效干预。正因为收益清楚、代价合理,政府后续的迟疑才显得更不应当,也更契合全文对 weak political will 的批评。

    把证据归拢到结论
  4. P4

    Delay, Lobbying, and Government Hesitation

    The government's prolonged delay raised suspicions of lobbying influence and political hesitation.

    本段把文章从“政策应不应该实施”推进到“为什么迟迟未实施”。它直接支撑文章主旨中 delayed implementation 和 susceptibility to tobacco industry lobbying 两个核心判断,并为下文进一步追究 Cameron 政府责任作铺垫。

    从时间线读出拖延
  5. P5

    The Missing Political Will

    Parliamentary support existed, but Cameron lacked the political will to implement the policy.

    本段是全文批评的核心落点:它以 parliamentary support 反衬政府的不作为,把政策延误明确归因于 Cameron 的领导意志不足。由此,文章主旨中的 weak political will 不再只是评价,而获得了制度事实的支撑。

    排除障碍,锁定意愿
  6. P6

    A Reluctant Victory over Tobacco Influence

    The policy advanced only under external pressure because the government lacked independence from tobacco interests.

    本段总结并强化全文立场:素面包装本身是 sensible policy,但政府的功劳有限,因为真正促成行动的是 opposition 与 external pressure。它完整回扣文章主旨,最终谴责 Cameron 政府既政治意志薄弱,又过度受 big tobacco interests 牵制。

    抓住结尾的总评语气
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

6 道逐段细节自检题

针对2016年12月英语六级真题第3套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 fancy packaging veteran nicotine addicts

    What is argued about fancy packaging and veteran nicotine addicts?

    • A It is the main reason why they decide to quit smoking.
    • B It makes cigarettes more affordable for long-term smokers.
    • C It is unlikely to affect their decision to continue smoking.
    • D It encourages them to switch to other addictive products.
    • E It determines whether they support government regulation.
    • F It has already caused a mass movement among them to stop smoking.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项准确保留了原文 fancy packaging plays no role in the decision to keep smoking 的核心关系:affect 对应 plays no role 所表达的影响关系,continue smoking 对应 keep smoking,且 their 严格指向 veteran nicotine addicts。命题人设置的障碍是同义改写和语气调整:选项没有逐词复现 no role,但仍保持包装不会实质改变其继续吸烟决定的否定方向。

    否定关系扫描 时间极紧时,不必先通读。直接用题干中的 fancy packaging 加 veteran nicotine addicts 锁定 第1段,再只做一次“否定词扫描”:看定位句及其相邻句中的 no、without、unlikely 一类负向信号。随后在选项中优先保留与这种负向关系、且对象仍为 veteran addicts 的正确项;其余选项即使含有 smoking 也快速排除。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 standardised packaging

    What is the main purpose of standardised packaging according to the theory?

    • A To make current addicts immediately give up smoking.
    • B To reduce the tax burden on tobacco manufacturers.
    • C To persuade tobacco firms to advertise more responsibly.
    • D To discourage younger generations from taking up smoking.
    • E To classify all consumer products as narcotics.
    • F To satisfy the commercial interests of tobacco companies.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项完整对应 discourage new generations from starting in the first place。To discourage 准确保留了目的性,younger generations 对应 new generations,taking up smoking 对应 starting。障碍在于原文没有直接使用 prevent 或 take up;考生需识别 discourage 与该行为的同向改写,同时不能把目标对象误认成 veteran smokers。

    目的对象替换 先从 main purpose 判断这是“目的句”题,再以 standardised packaging 直达 第2段;不读全部论证,只锁定包含 theory 与目的结构的句子。用“目标对象替换法”判定:在六个选项中,只有正确项同时保留政策所瞄准的人群和其被阻止的起始行为,其他项必然至少错一格。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 evidence from Australia plain packaging

    What does the evidence from Australia suggest about plain packaging?

    • A It has completely eliminated smoking among young people.
    • B It has made tobacco advertising more appealing.
    • C It has increased the number of tobacco businesses.
    • D It proves that punitive duties are unnecessary.
    • E It helps move society further toward lower smoking rates.
    • F It shows that smoking is no longer a cause of premature death.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    正确项对应 Evidence from Australia suggests plain packaging pushes society further along that road,其中 that road 指前文监管导致 smoking fall 的路径。helps move society further 保留 suggest 的非绝对语气,lower smoking rates 还原了 fall in smoking。障碍在于指代理解:若不回看指代成分的 antecedent,考生可能误把 evidence 理解成支持任何一种监管措施。

    指代回拉趋势 直接寻找 Australia,锁定 第3段 后采用“指代回拉法”:不逐句精读,而是把概括性指代迅速回拉到前一句的 fall in smoking。再检查选项中哪一个只是把“沿着下降路径进一步推进”做了弱化同义改写;该正确项应保留渐进性,任何 complete、prove 式强断言立即排除。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 suspended July 2013

    What happened after the plan was suspended in July 2013?

    • A The government immediately enacted the packaging rules.
    • B The Department of Health first announced its intention to consider the move.
    • C MPs rejected the proposal in a binding parliamentary vote.
    • D Philip Morris International became the government's legislative adviser.
    • E Cancer charities withdrew their pressure for reform.
    • F An additional consultation was followed by a renewed indication to proceed.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    原文在 suspension 后说明经历 an unnecessary round of additional consultation,随后 health minister said the government was minded to proceed after all。选项用 renewed indication to proceed 概括 was minded to proceed,保留“并非已完成立法,而是恢复推进意向”的准确程度。障碍是跨句整合:答案将 consultation 和 later statement 合并,考生须按顺序读取。

    时间轴跳读 将 July 2013 与 suspended 作为双锚点直达 第4段,随后采取“跳读括号法”:暂不处理 lobbying 插入语,只追踪下一个时间词 November 2013 及其后的动作。最后用程序阶段筛选:正确项应仍处于 consultation—intention 的中间阶段;若选项说 enacted、rejected 或 first announced,即可无需细读而排除。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 plain packaging

    Why had plain packaging not been implemented already?

    • A The government lacked sufficient political will to act.
    • B Parliament had refused to give the government regulatory power.
    • C Labour had withdrawn its amendments to the bill.
    • D The policy was judged ineffective by health workers.
    • E The tobacco trade had voluntarily adopted plain packages.
    • F The government was waiting for smoking rates to rise further.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    正确项直接改写 With sufficient will in Downing Street this would have been done already 与 strength of will is the missing ingredient。lacked sufficient political will 对应 missing strength of will,to act 对应 done already。障碍在于原文用反事实条件和比喻性 missing ingredient 表达原因,选项把它归纳为直接的因果判断;考生须读懂 would have been done 的隐含逻辑。

    反事实倒推 用题干中的 already 反向寻找 第5段 中 would have been done already,不必从头读政策史。随后只做“反事实补全”:把 With sufficient X, it would have been done 改写成 Since it was not done, X was insufficient。能与这个逻辑公式完全匹配的正确项即为答案;有关 Parliament、Labour 的选项虽来自同段,却只是已具备条件。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 political credit

    Who deserves the political credit for the policy, according to the author?

    • A The government.
    • B The opposition.
    • C Big tobacco companies.
    • D The lobbying firm linked to Lynton Crosby.
    • E Members of Parliament as a whole.
    • F Australian health authorities.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    原文明确断言 any political credit due belongs to the opposition,正确项完全对应这一归属。该题的关键障碍是让步陷阱:government has moved into a sensible public health policy 容易诱导考生选 government,但作者紧接着以 reluctantly 和 over-cautiousness 削弱其功劳,并把 credit 转交给 opposition。

    转折后判功 以 political credit 直定位 第6段,采用“转折后裁决法”:不纠缠前半句 government 的行动事实,只看 but 后对 credit belongs to 的明确归属。正确项是唯一承接该归属动词的选项;所有其他主体即便在文中真实出现,也只是让步对象、受批评对象或程序参与者。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    反驳烟草包装无关论

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 veteran nicotine addict 的 testimony 引出了一个 common argument:fancy packaging 对 smoking decision 没有 role,所以 stripping branding 不会 trigger mass movement to quit。作者用这个 opposing view 作为 starting point,为后续的 counterargument 做铺垫。

    这个 introductory section 建立了 debate context,presenting 反对 plain packaging 的 typical argument,为后文揭示 government's reluctance 和 weak political will 奠定 argumentative foundation。通过 present opposing view 的方式,让读者理解这个 policy 背后存在的 controversy。

    引出包装立法争议
  2. 分论点 P2

    政府立法真实动机

    这个 section 用 'But' 明确 refute 前面的 argument,revealing the government's real rationale:在 pressure from cancer charities, health workers and Labour party 下同意 legislate for standardised packaging。Real theory 是 strip smoking of appeal 来 discourage new generations,将 cigarettes 从 inviting consumer products reclassify 为 narcotics。

    这个 section 作为第一个 supporting point,establish 了 policy 的 public health rationale 和 external pressure background。它为后文 contrast government's justified motivation 和 actual delayed implementation 提供 reference point,highlighting the gap between sound policy reason 和 weak execution。

    阐述立法真正目的
  3. 分论点 P3

    立法必要性的证据支撑

    这个 section 从 tobacco industry's opposition 出发,通过 historical intervention(banning advertising, health warnings, punitive duties)展示 government measures 的 effectiveness:smoking numbers roughly halved since 1970s。Evidence from Australia 的 plain packaging 进一步 support this approach。因为 tobacco 是 premature death 的 biggest cause 之一,所以 measure that tames the habit even by fraction is worth trying。

    这个 evidence-based section 通过 historical data 和 international example strengthen policy justification,making the subsequent revelation of government's delay 更加 ironic 和 problematic。它 establish 了 strong evidence base,让后文对 Cameron's reluctance 的 criticism 更有 weight。

    提供立法有效性证据
  4. 分论点 P4

    立法延迟的政治原因

    这个 section 回答 'why so long' 的问题,详细 trace implementation timeline:Department of Health 在 2010 年 declare intention,2012 年 consult,但 2013 年 7 月 suspend plan。Key revelation 是 lobbying firm set up by Lynton Crosby(Cameron's campaign director)previously acted for Philip Morris。尽管 PM denied connection,但 2013 年 11 月 after additional consultation,policy 才 proceed,现在 MPs 将 have free vote before March dissolution。

    这是 article 的 critical turning point,directly expose government's susceptibility to tobacco lobbying。通过 detailed timeline 和 Crosby connection,它 provide concrete evidence of political interference,是 support main thesis about weak political will 的 核心 section。

    揭露烟草游说影响
  5. 分论点 P5

    首相意志力的缺失

    这个 section 进一步 criticise Cameron personally:Parliament 已经 voted overwhelmingly for Labour amendments including power to regulate plain packaging,with sufficient will in Downing Street 本应 done already。但 strength of will is missing ingredient where Cameron and public health are concerned。他的 attitude to state intervention 一直 confused,引用 2006 年他对 chocolate oranges at checkouts fueling obesity 的 bizarre lament 作为 evidence。

    这个 section 将 criticism 集中到 Cameron's personal weakness,identify 'lack of will' 作为 core problem。通过 contrast parliamentary support 和 executive inaction,以及 cite Cameron's past inconsistency,它 sharpen 对 leadership failure 的 indictment,为 final conclusion 做准备。

    批判首相个人软弱
  6. 结论 P6

    政治功劳归属与持续风险

    这个 concluding paragraph 对整个 situation 做 final assessment:government moved reluctantly into sensible policy,但 with obvious over-cautiousness,所以 political credit 属于 opposition。最重要的 warning 是:without sustained external pressure,Cameron 肯定 still be hooked on big tobacco companies' interests。

    作为 conclusion,这个 section 不仅 summarize government's reluctance 和 opposition's credit,更重要的是 project forward,warning that without continuous pressure,Cameron 会 remain susceptible to tobacco interests。这个 forward-looking warning reinforce 整个 article 的 central thesis about weak political will,并给出 implicit call for continued vigilance。

    总结并警示未来风险
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段找争议和立场 P1

    议论文的 first paragraph 通常会 present the topic 并暗示 author's stance,通过识别 argument 的 direction(支持或反对),我们能初步 narrow down 文章的 main argument 范围,避免被 surface-level details 误导。

  2. 找主要冲突方及其行为 P2 P3 P4

    议论文主旨往往围绕 central conflict 展开,通过识别 main actors(政府、烟草业、反对党等)和他们的 opposing interests,我们能把握文章 criticize 或 defend 的核心对象,从而精准定位 author's evaluative target。

  3. 时间线配合因果解释 P4 P5

    当文章详细描述 timeline 和 causation 时,作者通常在 build an argument about why things happened,而非仅仅 report events。通过分析 explanatory language('that is why', 'so why', 'but'),我们能识别作者的 causal claims 和 underlying criticism。

  4. 结尾功劳归属判断 P6

    议论文的 conclusion 通常会 consolidate the argument 并给出 clear verdict。通过识别 who gets credit 和 who gets blamed('credit due belongs to', 'without pressure'),我们能确认文章的 ultimate argumentative target 和 author's evaluative stance。

  5. 多线索归纳双重批评 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    议论文主旨往往不是 single-point statement,而是 multi-dimensional argument。通过整合前面步骤中的 patterns(行为延迟、外部压力、利益关联、功劳转移),我们能构建出 complete thematic picture:不仅是 what happened,更是 why it matters 和 who is responsible。

主旨信号词 reluctantly P6 susceptibility P6 violently opposed P3 credit due belongs to the opposition P6 strength of will is the missing ingredient P5

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

英国政府推迟实施香烟素包装立法反映了薄弱的政治意愿和对烟草行业游说的屈从,尽管该措施具有明确的公共健康益处并获得议会支持。
The UK government's delayed implementation of plain cigarette packaging legislation reflects weak political will and susceptibility to tobacco industry lobbying, despite clear public health benefits and parliamentary support for the measure.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • testify 作证;证实;证明

    我们来整合这些 clues。首先,从 sentence structure 看,veteran addict 在对某个观点进行 assertion;其次,从 word formation 角度,test- 词根与 evidence 相关,配合 -ify 后缀暗示 "提供证据" 的动作;最后,从 semantic context 看,veteran 这个 modifier 强调了说话者的 authority 来自 firsthand experience。将这三条线索结合,我们可以推断这个词表达的是 "基于经验作证" 或 "证实" 的含义。

    动词三维分析法
  • premature 过早的;提前的;未成熟的

    让我们串联这些 evidence。第一,从 collocation 看,premature 与 death 搭配出现在 public health discourse 中,暗示时间维度的 abnormality;第二,从 morphology 看,pre-(之前)+ mature(成熟)直接构建了 "在应有时间之前" 的含义;第三,从 logical structure 看,文章将其作为 preventable problem 讨论,证实了 "不当时机" 的 interpretation。综合判断,这个词描述的是 "在 natural 或 expected time 之前发生" 的状态。

    词缀拆解配搭配验证
  • tame 控制;驯服;削弱

    整合三条 threads:首先,在 第3段 的 intervention context 中,tame 与 banning、imposing 等 restrictive actions 并列,serving the same goal of reducing smoking;其次,第6段 的 repetition 将 tame 与 tobacco trade 连接,reinforcing 其 "控制" 的含义;最后,从 semantic metaphor 角度,tame 从 animal domain 迁移到 policy domain,保留了 "驯化/控制" 这个 essential meaning。综合推断,tame 在此表达 "控制" 或 "抑制" 某种 undesirable force。

    本义激活语境验证法
  • lament 哀叹;悲叹;抱怨

    让我们 synthesize 这些 clues。从 pragmatic level,lament 引出的 that-clause 内容是 social problem,表明这是某种 expression of disapproval;从 authorial stance,作者用 bizarre 来 critique 这个 lament,suggesting 它是 ineffectual complaining 而非 real action;从 word family connection,与 lamentable 的 potential link 指向 "表达遗憾" 的含义。综合判断,lament 是一个表达 "哀叹" 或 "抱怨" 的动词,通常带有 powerless 或 insincere 的 connotation。

    言语行为动词三维分析
  • dissolve 解散;终止

    整合三条 reasoning paths:从 temporal logic 看,parliament dissolution 是 free vote 的 deadline,marking 一个 period 的 end;从 semantic metaphor 看,physical dissolving 的 "消失" 含义迁移到 institutional context,表示 parliament 暂时 cease functioning;从 narrative structure 看,dissolution 是整个 legislative timeline 的 culmination point,具有 finality。综合推断,dissolve 在 political context 中指 "解散(议会)",即 formally terminate 其 current session。

    原型隐喻映射策略
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 引用论证

    P1

    文章开头引用了 veteran nicotine addict 的 testimony,指出 fancy packaging 对 smoking decision 没有影响。这个 reference 其实是在 anticipate 反对者的 argument,然后立即用 'But that isn't why' 进行 refutation。这种 rhetorical strategy 帮助 establish 作者的 credibility,同时为后续 plain packaging policy 的真正 rationale 做铺垫,强化了文章 main thesis:政策目的是 discourage new generations,而非让 existing addicts 戒烟。

    信号词 testify according to evidence suggests research shows experts argue studies indicate as noted by cited in

    仿写: 在写 argumentative essay 时,可以先 acknowledge 对方的 perspective 或 cite 一个 commonly held belief,然后用转折来 introduce 你的 actual argument。比如写 digital device usage 话题时:'Many parents believe 严格限制 screen time 就能保护孩子,but research suggests 更重要的是 quality of content rather than quantity of time。' 仿写模版:'[某群体] will testify/argue that [观点A], but that isn't [真正的核心问题] - the real issue is [你的论点]。'

  • 因果论证

    P2 P3

    第二段使用了 clear causal reasoning,通过 'The theory is that' 引出 cause-effect relationship:removing appeal from packaging → discourage new generations from starting。接着用 'would be another step' 描述 sequential causation:plain packaging → reclassification of cigarettes → reduce attractiveness。这个 causal chain 直接 support 文章 thesis 中关于 public health benefits 的部分,解释了 policy 的 underlying logic,让 government's delayed action 显得更加 unjustifiable。

    信号词 theory is that because therefore thus as a result consequently leads to trigger would be since

    仿写: 构建 causal argument 时,要 explicitly state 你的 reasoning chain。可以用 'The theory/logic is that' 开头,然后用 arrow-like language 展示 progression。例如讨论 education policy:'减少 class size 的 theory 是:smaller classes → more individual attention → better learning outcomes → improved academic performance。' 仿写模版:'The theory/rationale is that [action A] would [mechanism B], thereby leading to [outcome C], which represents [broader goal D]。'

  • 举例论证

    P3

    第三段使用 Australia 作为 concrete example 来 support plain packaging policy 的 effectiveness:'Evidence from Australia suggests plain packaging pushes society further along that road。' 这个 specific case 为 abstract policy discussion 提供了 empirical backing,增强了 argument 的 persuasiveness。Example 的使用直接 reinforce 文章 thesis 中 'clear public health benefits' 的 claim,同时 implicitly criticize UK government 的 delayed action - 既然 Australia 已经 demonstrate success,UK 还在 hesitate 就显得 unjustifiable。

    信号词 Evidence from for example for instance such as the case of take...as an example illustrated by demonstrated by

    仿写: 使用 examples 时要选择 relevant and credible cases。可以用 'Evidence from [place/study]' 或 'The case of [example]' 来 introduce。写 environmental policy 时可以说:'Evidence from Denmark suggests 大力发展 wind energy 不仅 reduces carbon emissions,还能 create economic opportunities in renewable sector。' 仿写模版:'Evidence/Experience from [具体案例] suggests/shows that [action] [positive outcome], demonstrating [broader implication]。'

  • 对比论证

    P3 P4 P5 P6

    文章在多处使用 contrast 来 highlight contradictions。第三段对比 tobacco industry 的 violent opposition 和 government intervention 的 necessity;第四段对比 intended timeline(2010年 declare intention)和 actual timeline(suspended in 2013, 再 resumed);第五段对比 Parliament 的 overwhelming support 和 Cameron 的 lack of will。这些 contrasts 共同 serve 文章的 central thesis:expose 政府的 weak political will 和 susceptibility to lobbying。Especially 在第六段,'opposition deserves credit' vs. 'government moved reluctantly' 的对比 crystallize 了整个 critique。

    信号词 but however whereas while in contrast on the other hand yet nevertheless instead rather than

    仿写: 构建 contrast 时要选择 meaningful oppositions,可以是 action vs. inaction,promise vs. reality,或 different stakeholders 的 positions。用 'while'、'whereas'、'in contrast' 等来 mark the opposition。例如写 corporate responsibility:'While companies claim 重视 sustainability,their actual investments in green technology remain minimal, suggesting 更多是 PR gesture rather than genuine commitment。' 仿写模版:'While/Whereas [group A] [action/claim A], [group B] [contrasting action/claim B], revealing/suggesting [implication]。'

  • 比喻修辞

    P6

    第六段使用 'hooked' 来描述 Cameron 对 tobacco industry interests 的 dependency,这是一个 powerful metaphor,因为 'hooked' 本身与 addiction 相关。这个 word choice 创造了 ironic parallel:文章讨论的是 cigarette addiction,而 politician 自己也 'hooked' on industry interests。这个 metaphor 不仅 vivid and memorable,而且 reinforce 文章 thesis 关于 political will 缺失的 critique,suggesting Cameron 的 dependency 就像 nicotine addiction 一样 hard to break。

    信号词 hooked like as if trapped drowning mirror echo fuel seductively

    仿写: 使用 metaphor 时要选择与 topic 有 thematic connection 的 imagery。这里 'hooked' 特别 effective 因为它 echo 了 addiction theme。写 technology dependency 可以说:'Users find themselves trapped in algorithmic echo chambers, where each click tightens the walls。' 仿写模版:选择一个与 topic 相关的 concrete image,然后用它来 describe abstract situation,creating 一个 layer of meaning。比如讨论 financial crisis 时用 'domino effect',讨论 information overload 时用 'drowning in data'。

  • 反问修辞

    P4

    第四段用 'So why has it taken so long?' 作为 rhetorical question 来 transition into 对 delay 原因的分析。这个 question 不是真的 seeking answer,而是 emphasize 拖延的 unreasonable nature,同时 build suspense for 即将揭露的 lobbying scandal。这个 device 直接 support 文章 thesis 关于 political will 缺失的 critique,通过 pose 这个 question,作者 invite readers 去 judge the government's excuse 和 real motivations 之间的 gap。

    信号词 So why Why How can Who would What if Isn't it Don't we Shouldn't

    仿写: 使用 rhetorical question 时要确保 answer 是 self-evident 或会在后文 address。它应该 create 一种 'of course' 或 'obviously' 的 effect。例如讨论 climate inaction:'So why do governments continue subsidizing fossil fuels while claiming climate commitment? The answer lies in [揭示原因]。' 仿写模版:'So why [seemingly irrational situation]? [Follow with explanation revealing real reasons/contradictions]。' 关键是 timing:在 build up evidence 之后,用 rhetorical question 来 pivot to deeper analysis。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

10 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 老烟民证词反驳包装作用

    P1
    Any veteran nicotine addict will testify that fancy packaging plays no role in the decision to keep smoking. So, it is argued, stripping cartons of their branding will trigger no mass movement to quit.

    让步转折类 So, it is argued admittedly granted it is true that one might argue some contend critics claim

    作者在 opening paragraph 故意 present 一个看似 reasonable 的 objection——老烟民不在乎 packaging,所以 plain packaging 无效。但通过 'it is argued' 这个 distancing phrase,作者 signal 这不是他的 view。这个 strategic concession 为第二段的 real argument 铺路:政策的 target 不是 existing addicts,而是 preventing new smokers。这种 rhetorical move 对主旨至关重要,因为它 preemptively addresses 最 obvious objection,让后续 defense of the policy 显得更 credible 和 well-reasoned。

  • 政策真实目的揭示

    P2
    But that isn't why the government—under pressure from cancer charities, health workers and the Labour party—has agreed to legislate for standardised packaging. The theory is that smoking should be stripped of any appeal to discourage new generations from starting in the first place.

    转折对比类 But that isn't why not because the real reason is actually in fact rather instead

    这个 turning point reveal 政策的 genuine objective:不是让 existing smokers quit(这是 paragraph 1 的 straw man),而是 prevent youth initiation。'Under pressure' 这个 phrase 也暗示 government action 不是 purely health-motivated,而是 response to external forces。这对主旨 crucial,因为它 establishes 政策的 legitimacy(基于 prevention logic)同时 hints at political dynamics(pressure groups 的 role),为后面 criticizing government's reluctance 和 industry influence 埋下 foreshadowing。

  • 烟草业虚伪否认

    P3
    Naturally, the tobacco industry is violently opposed. No business likes to admit that it sells addictive poison as a lifestyle choice.

    委婉暗示类 No business likes to admit few would acknowledge reluctant to accept conveniently ignore prefer not to mention unsurprisingly deny rarely confess

    作者通过 seemingly neutral observation(没有企业喜欢承认卖毒品)actually deliver damning characterization:tobacco industry sells 'addictive poison as lifestyle choice'。'Naturally' 和 'violently opposed' 的 juxtaposition 创造 irony——industry opposition 是 'natural' 不是因为 legitimate concerns,而是因为它们 selling poison。这个 implication 对主旨 essential:它 establishes tobacco industry as morally bankrupt actor,为后面 criticizing government's susceptibility to industry lobbying 提供 moral foundation。

  • 澳洲证据轻描淡写

    P3
    Evidence from Australia suggests plain packaging pushes society further along that road.

    模糊限制语类 Evidence from Australia suggests suggests indicates appears to seems to tends to may imply

    虽然用 'suggests' 这个 cautious verb,但作者紧接着 assert 'worth trying',revealing 他 actually confident about effectiveness。这个 subtle move 服务于 rhetorical purpose:appear evidence-based and reasonable while building case for action。对主旨而言,这 establish 政策的 empirical basis,making subsequent criticism of government delay 更 justified——既然 evidence supports action,拖延就是 indefensible。

  • 政府拖延原因质疑

    P4
    So why has it taken so long? The Department of Health declared its intention to consider the move in November 2010 and consulted through 2012. But the plan was suspended in July 2013.

    反问句类 So why has it taken so long? So why Why then How can it be that What explains Why on earth How is it possible

    这个 rhetorical question 是 turning point,从 defending policy merits 转向 attacking government inaction。Following timeline reveal 三年多的 delays 和 suspicious reversal,especially connection to Lynton Crosby 和 Philip Morris。虽然 parenthetical 提到 PM's denial,但整个 structure imply causation:lobbyist involvement caused policy suspension。这对主旨 central:it expose 'weak political will' 和 'susceptibility to tobacco lobbying',transforming article from policy analysis into political critique。

  • 首相否认的括号处理

    P4
    It did not escape notice that a lobbying firm set up by Lynton Crosby, David Cameron's election campaign director, had previously acted for Philip Morris International. (The prime minister denied there was a connection between his new adviser's outside interests and the change in legislative programme.)

    括号弱化反驳类 (The prime minister denied there was a connection) parentheses enclosing denials bracketed qualifications aside in dashes footnoted objections parenthetical dismissals

    通过 relegating Cameron's denial to parentheses,作者 visually and rhetorically dismiss it as inadequate。主句 establish suspicious timing and connections with authority('It did not escape notice'),而 denial 被 tucked away as afterthought。这个 structural choice imply denial 不可信或 insufficient。对主旨 vital:它 reinforce 核心批评——government susceptible to industry influence—while maintaining plausible deniability(作者 technically included PM's denial)。这种 sophisticated rhetorical technique 让 accusation 更 powerful precisely because it's implicit。

  • 议会授权的反讽对比

    P5
    Parliament has in fact already authorised the government to tame the tobacco trade. MPs voted overwhelmingly in favour of Labour amendments to the children and families bill last February that included the power to regulate for plain packaging. With sufficient will in Downing Street this would have been done already.

    强调对比类 in fact already has long since should have been by now ages ago well before previously authorized

    这个 passage reveal devastating fact:parliamentary authority existed since February,MPs voted 'overwhelmingly',yet government still hasn't acted。'With sufficient will' 这个 conditional directly name problem—not legal obstacles or procedural issues,而是 Cameron's personal 'strength of will'。通过 contrast 清晰的 parliamentary mandate with continued inaction,作者 prove government delay 是 choice not necessity。这对主旨 conclusive:它 eliminate 所有 alternative explanations for delay,leaving only 'weak political will' 和 industry influence,completing article's central accusation。

  • 首相态度的奇怪例证

    P5
    His attitude to state intervention has looked confused ever since his bizarre 2006 lament that chocolate oranges placed seductively at supermarket checkouts fueled obesity.

    情态评价词类 bizarre absurd curious strange inexplicable contradictory confused

    Calling Cameron's chocolate orange comment 'bizarre' serve 双重 purpose:first,它 ridicule 他的 inconsistency on public health(concerned about checkout placement 但 not tobacco packaging);second,通过 dredging up old foolish-sounding quote,it undermine 他的 overall credibility on health policy。'Confused' 和 'bizarre' paint picture of leader lacking coherent principles,只是 reactive 和 inconsistent。这 reinforce 主旨的 'weak will' characterization—his positions on intervention aren't principled but erratic,making him vulnerable to lobbying pressure。This personal critique elevate article from policy analysis to character indictment。

  • 政治功劳归属转移

    P6
    The government has moved reluctantly into a sensible public health policy, but with such obvious over-cautiousness that any political credit due belongs to the opposition.

    让步转折类 but with such obvious over-cautiousness that but with such...that yet so...that though with such...that albeit so...that however with such...that

    Final paragraph 的 opening 表面 acknowledge government action,但 'reluctantly'、'such obvious over-cautiousness' 完全 negate 任何 praise,最后 'credit belongs to opposition' explicitly transfer 功劳。这是 rhetorical crescendo—文章 built case against Cameron through details,现在 deliver final verdict。对主旨 conclusive:government eventually did 正确的 thing,但 only because external pressure,并且 so slowly and hesitantly that opposition deserves credit。这 complete characterization of weak leadership susceptible to industry interests。

  • 持续压力必要性暗示

    P6
    Without sustained external pressure it seems certain Mr. Cameron would still be hooked on the interests of big tobacco companies.

    反事实假设类 Without sustained external pressure it seems certain Without X, it seems certain Absent X, Y would Were it not for X Had there been no X In the absence of X But for X

    这个 closing sentence 是 article's ultimate indictment,用 counterfactual to assert Cameron's fundamental loyalty is to tobacco industry not public health。'Hooked' 这个 addiction metaphor 特别 damning—它 echo 文章开头的 nicotine addiction theme,suggesting Cameron himself is 'addicted' to industry interests。'Sustained external pressure' reveal 唯一阻止他 surrender to industry 的力量是 persistent opposition 和 advocacy groups,不是他的 own principles。这个 conclusion 完美 encapsulate 主旨的所有 elements:weak will,industry influence,和 dependence on external pressure for right action。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:消极批判

结论先行:本文作者态度为消极批判( Disapproving of the government's foot-dragging, though supportive of the policy itself)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇对立观点与but转折 P1 P2

    议论文常常先呈现一个待反驳的观点,再用But/However亮出真实立场,所以开篇的转折词往往就是作者态度的第一个signal。

  2. worth trying等评价词 P3

    议论文里作者经常通过评价性词语(worth、sensible、reasonable等)直接亮明对某个具体做法的态度,这类词是outward expression中最直接的positive或negative信号。

  3. 政府拖延的批评词 P4 P5 P6

    议论文的作者态度往往不是针对话题本身,而是针对话题中的某一方(此处是government),所以要区分作者态度指向的对象,避免把对policy的支持和对government的批评混为一谈。

  4. 末段一句定论 P6

    议论文的末段通常是作者态度的summary和conclusion,会把前文分散的评价词汇浓缩成一句定论,因此是判断作者overall attitude效率最高的位置。

文中的态度信号词

  • But P2

    这个转折词直接推翻了第1段里烟民对packaging不起作用的看法,引出作者真正认同的立场——plain packaging是为了阻止new generations开始吸烟。

    同类词 However Yet Nonetheless

  • worth trying P3

    直接用肯定性短语评价plain packaging这项measure,说明作者对这项policy本身持positive态度,认为即使效果有限也值得推行。

    同类词 sensible reasonable worthwhile

  • reluctantly P6

    用来描述政府推行政策的方式,带有明显negative connotation,暗示作者对政府拖延推行plain packaging十分不满。

    同类词 hesitantly grudgingly

  • over-cautiousness P6

    直接指出政府的谨慎已经过头,是作者对政府迟迟不推行政策的直接批评,也呼应了前文提到的多次suspend和consultation。

    同类词 overcautious excessive caution

  • bizarre P5

    用来形容Cameron在2006年关于chocolate oranges的言论,带有轻微嘲讽色彩,进一步强化作者对Cameron态度前后矛盾的批评。

    同类词 confused odd absurd

  • hooked on P6

    用吸毒成瘾式的metaphor来形容Cameron与烟草业利益的关系,暗示作者认为政府与tobacco industry之间的关系并不清白,是全文最强烈的批评表达。

    同类词 addicted to in the pocket of

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 识别争议性表述 P1

    在 第1段 中,作者提到了 'it is argued' 这个典型的 argumentative phrase,表明存在不同的 viewpoints。这种 presenting opposing views 的方式是议论文的标志,说明文只会客观陈述 information,新闻报道则侧重于 reporting what happened。

  2. 定位作者立场 P2 P3

    第2段 开头的 'But' 是个 strong signal,表明作者要 present 自己的 position 了。然后 'The theory is' 和 'would be another step' 这些表达显示作者在 support 某个 policy。这种明确的 stance-taking 是议论文的核心特征,说明文保持 neutral 和 objective,新闻报道虽然可能有 bias 但不会如此 explicitly argue for a position。

  3. 论证结构识别 P3

    第3段 中的 'Evidence from Australia suggests' 和 'Since tobacco is one of the biggest causes' 展示了典型的 argumentation pattern。作者在用 empirical evidence 和 logical reasoning 来 justify 自己的 position。这种 deliberate construction of arguments 是议论文独有的,说明文只是 organize information logically,新闻报道按照 chronological order 或 inverted pyramid structure 来呈现。

  4. 批判性分析 P4 P5

    第4段 和 第5段 深入 analyze 了政府的 delay 和 Cameron 的 weak will。用 'So why has it taken so long?'、'It did not escape notice'、'strength of will is the missing ingredient' 这些表达,作者在 critically examine 政策执行中的 problems。这种 critical analysis 和 questioning 是议论文的重要特征,说明文不会 judge or critique,新闻报道虽然可能 report controversies 但不会像这样 dive deep into analysis。

  5. 结论性评判 P6

    第6段 用 'reluctantly'、'obvious over-cautiousness'、'any political credit due belongs to the opposition' 这些 strongly worded phrases 来 deliver a final verdict。最后一句 'Without sustained external pressure it seems certain Mr. Cameron would still be hooked' 更是 making a definitive judgment。这种 conclusive stance 是议论文的 hallmark,说明文的结尾通常是 summary of information,新闻报道往往以 least important details 或 future outlook 收尾,都不会像这样 deliver a judgment。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • it is argued P1 观点引导词 it is claimed it is believed it is suggested some argue that critics contend that
  • But P2 论证逻辑连接词 However Nevertheless Yet On the contrary In contrast
  • Naturally P3 立场表态词 Obviously Clearly Undoubtedly Of course Certainly
  • is violently opposed P3 立场表态词 strongly disagrees vehemently rejects fiercely contests adamantly opposes vigorously defends
  • That is why P3 论证逻辑连接词 Therefore Thus Hence Consequently As a result
  • This approach has led P3 论证逻辑连接词 This approach has led to This policy resulted in Such measures have caused These actions produced This strategy brought about
  • is worth trying P3 立场表态词 deserves consideration merits support warrants action should be pursued is justified
  • So why P4 论证逻辑连接词 Then why But why The question is why One might ask why This raises the question
  • It did not escape notice P4 立场表态词 It is no coincidence Notably Significantly Tellingly It is revealing that
  • But strength of will is the missing ingredient P5 立场表态词 the missing ingredient is the real problem is the fundamental issue is what's lacking is the core weakness is
  • His attitude...has looked confused P5 立场表态词 has looked confused appears inconsistent seems contradictory shows hypocrisy reveals weakness
  • but with such obvious over-cautiousness P6 立场表态词 with such obvious with clear reluctance with evident hesitation with unmistakable bias with apparent unwillingness
  • any political credit due belongs to P6 立场表态词 credit belongs to responsibility lies with blame rests on the real hero is we should thank
  • it seems certain P6 立场表态词 it appears clear one can conclude the evidence suggests it stands to reason we can infer
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

8 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 的常见问题

2016年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section C (1) 文章 The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 的原文出自哪里?
The Guardian《卫报》2015.01.22 文章The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking(《卫报》观点之香烟包装:熏出保守党思想)。
2016年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 的主旨是什么?
英国政府推迟实施香烟素包装立法反映了薄弱的政治意愿和对烟草行业游说的屈从,尽管该措施具有明确的公共健康益处并获得议会支持。(英文表述:The UK government's delayed implementation of plain cigarette packaging legislation reflects weak political will and susceptibility to tobacco industry lobbying, despite clear public health benefits and parliamentary support for the measure.)
The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking(2016年12月英语六级真题第3套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是消极批判(Disapproving of the government's foot-dragging, though supportive of the policy itself)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 444 词、6 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2016年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 6 段按议论文骨架分为 6 个意群:引言 · 第1段——反驳烟草包装无关论;分论点 · 第2段——政府立法真实动机;分论点 · 第3段——立法必要性的证据支撑;分论点 · 第4段——立法延迟的政治原因;分论点 · 第5段——首相意志力的缺失;结论 · 第6段——政治功劳归属与持续风险。
The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是消极批判(Disapproving of the government's foot-dragging, though supportive of the policy itself)。判断路径:开篇对立观点与but转折 → worth trying等评价词 → 政府拖延的批评词 → 末段一句定论;文中的态度信号词包括 But(第2段)、worth trying(第3段)、reluctantly(第6段)、over-cautiousness(第6段)、bizarre(第5段)、hooked on(第6段)。
2016年12月英语六级真题第3套文章 The Guardian view on cigarette packaging: smoking out Conservative thinking 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:testify(作证;证实;证明)、premature(过早的;提前的;未成熟的)、tame(控制;驯服;削弱)、lament(哀叹;悲叹;抱怨)、dissolve(解散;终止),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: