懒笔记
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 · Part II Section C (2) · 听力

2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)

议论文 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 395 词、3 段，CEFR 难度 C1（C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%），作者立场为「客观中立」；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

3 段英文原文

以下为2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的听力原文，共 3 段。左侧 P1–P3 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

Last week I attended a research workshop on an island in the South Pacific. Thirty people were present and all except me came from the island, called Makelua, in the nation of Vanuatu. They live in 16 different communities and speak 16 distinct languages. In many cases, you could stand at the edge of one village and see the outskirts of the next community. Yet the residents of each village speak a completely different language. According to recent work by my colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, this island, just 100 kilometers long and 20 kilometers wide, is home to speakers of perhaps 40 different indigenous languages.

Why so many? We could ask the same question of the entire globe. People don't speak one universal language, or even a handful. Instead, today our species collectively speaks over 7,000 distinct languages. And these languages are not spread randomly across the planet. For example, far more languages are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones. The tropical island of New Guinea is home to over 900 languages. Russia, 20 times larger, has 105 indigenous languages. Even within the tropics, language diversity varies widely. For example, the 250,000 people who live on Vanuatu's 80 islands speak 110 different languages, but in Bangladesh, a population 600 times greater speaks only 41 languages.

How come humans speak so many languages? And why are they so unevenly spread across the planet? As it turns out, we have few clear answers to these fundamental questions about how humanity communicates. Most people can easily brainstorm possible answers to these intriguing questions. They hypothesize that language diversity must be about history, cultural differences, mountains or oceans dividing populations. But when our diverse team of researchers from six different disciplines and eight different countries began to review what was known, we were shocked that only a dozen previous studies had been done, including one we ourselves completed on language diversity in the Pacific. These prior efforts all examined the degree to which different environmental, social, and geographic variables correlated with the number of languages found in a given location. The results varied a lot from one study to another, and no clear patterns emerged. The studies also ran up against many methodological challenges, the biggest of which centered on the old statistical saying—correlation does not equal causation.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

3 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读，并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    A Small Island, Many Languages

    Makelua illustrates extreme linguistic diversity despite its small size and closely situated communities.

    本段对全文主旨的价值在于，它用 Makelua 的 extreme case 让读者直观感到 linguistic diversity 的真实规模。作者先制造 “why can this happen?” 的阅读悬念，随后才把视野从单一岛屿扩展到全球，并最终指出科学界对此缺乏 clear answers。

    抓住小岛多语反差
  2. P2

    The Uneven Geography of Languages

    Global language diversity is vast and highly uneven, varying across and even within regions.

    本段把 第1段 的 island case 提升为 worldwide pattern，从而直接支撑文章主旨中的 “over 7,000 languages” 与 “unevenly distributed”。更重要的是，多组 counterintuitive comparisons 显示现象远比表面复杂，为 第3段 提出科学界尚无明确解释提供了必要的问题背景。

    串联数据对比
  3. P3

    The Unsolved Puzzle of Language Diversity

    Existing research has not provided clear causal explanations for the world's uneven linguistic diversity.

    本段是全文论证的 conclusion，也是文章主旨最直接的落点：前两段展示了语言多样性 “what” 和 “where”，本段转而说明科学界尚未解决 “why”。它把惊人的全球现象转化为一个严肃的 scientific problem，并以 causation 的困难凸显人类 communication 研究中的关键空白。

    识别研究否定信号
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

3 道逐段细节自检题

针对2018年12月英语六级真题第2套这篇原文，每段配 1 道细节题（ 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ，由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制，非试卷原题）。 选项默认中性；点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法，现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 research evidence Makelua

    What does the research evidence suggest about Makelua?

    • A Each of its 16 communities uses exactly two indigenous languages.
    • B The workshop participants represented all the languages spoken on the island.
    • C The small island has speakers of perhaps 40 different indigenous languages.
    • D Its villages are too distant from one another for frequent contact.
    • E Its residents have replaced local languages with a common national language.
    • F The Max Planck researchers identified only 16 languages on the island.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    该项准确复现了 evidence 的信息链：Makelua 是 a small island，recent work 的结论是 it is home to speakers of perhaps 40 different indigenous languages。perhaps 保留了原文的限定力度，different indigenous languages 也没有把语言偷换成 communities 或 participants。障碍在于原文先出现 16 communities 和 16 distinct languages，随后才给出 perhaps 40；考生必须识别最后一句才是 research finding 的落点。

    末句对象配对 时间极紧时，直接以 Makelua 定位到 第1段，跳过开头的 workshop 叙事，视觉扫读含 Max Planck Institute 和 perhaps 的末句。随后采用“对象配对法”：只保留同时包含 island 与 languages、且数字来源紧贴 research finding 的选项；把将 communities、participants 或 village distance 配给语言结论的选项全部划掉。剩下的正确项就是答案项。这比逐字翻译整段更快，因为题目实际只考证据句的对象匹配。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 New Guinea comparisons

    What do the comparisons involving New Guinea, Russia, Vanuatu, and Bangladesh mainly demonstrate?

    • A Large countries consistently preserve more indigenous languages than small islands.
    • B Population growth is the principal cause of language diversification.
    • C Tropical regions contain exactly 900 languages in total.
    • D Language diversity is distributed unevenly and cannot be explained simply by land area or population size.
    • E Russia has fewer residents than Vanuatu because it has fewer languages.
    • F All tropical societies display the same degree of language diversity.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    两组 comparison 共同服务于这一结论。New Guinea 面积远小于 Russia，却有更多 languages，反驳“area 越大，语言越多”的简单对应；Vanuatu 人口远少于 Bangladesh，却有更多 languages，反驳“population 越多，语言越多”的简单对应。该项用 unevenly 概括段首主张，并以 cannot be explained simply 保持原文例证所支持的审慎力度。障碍在于答案没有逐一复述四个数字，而是要求考生完成 evidence-to-claim 的归纳。

    双组反例筛选 紧张时以 New Guinea 或 Bangladesh 直接定位 第2段，无需计算任何具体数值。采用“双反例删项法”：第一组数据专门筛掉把 land area 当作充分解释的选项，第二组数据专门筛掉把 population size 当作充分解释的选项；再剔除含 all、exactly、principal cause 等越界措辞的选项。唯一能够同时经受两组反例检验的正确项，就是答案项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 previous studies clear explanations

    Why did the previous studies fail to provide clear explanations for language diversity?

    • A They focused exclusively on the Pacific and ignored other regions.
    • B They had already proved that mountains and oceans cause linguistic differences.
    • C Researchers from different countries used incompatible languages to report their findings.
    • D The number of earlier investigations was too large to compare their results.
    • E They identified correlations among variables but could not establish causal relationships.
    • F They found one stable pattern that applied to every location.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：E

    prior efforts 的方法是考察 environmental, social, and geographic variables 与 language numbers 的 correlation，而最大 methodological challenge 被作者明确概括为 correlation does not equal causation。因此，这些研究即使发现变量共同变化，也无法回答哪些因素真正导致 language diversity，不能形成 clear explanations。障碍在于选项承认 correlations 的存在，容易让只抓关键词的考生误判为研究有效；but could not establish causal relationships 才准确补足作者强调的限制。

    相关因果压力测试 以 previous studies 定位 第3段 后，不必通读开头的两个 rhetorical questions，直接扫到 These prior efforts 之后，并锁定最后一个破折号后的 statistical saying。采用“因果词压力测试”：凡是选项声称 proved、cause、applied to every location，就反问原文是否给出了 causal design；若原文只谈 correlated，立即排除。能完整通过这项测试、并解释研究为何不够 clear 的正确项，即为答案项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    极端语言多样性现象引入

    作者通过 workshop experience 引出了一个 striking phenomenon：在 Makelua 这个 small island 上，30个人来自16个 communities，说着16种 distinct languages。这种 extreme linguistic diversity 让读者意识到 language distribution 的 peculiarity，为后续 exploration 做好铺垫。

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 concrete example 建立了文章的 foundation。Makelua island 的 case 不仅展示了 linguistic diversity 的 extreme nature，更重要的是它 sets up the puzzle：为什么如此 small area 会有如此 many languages？这个 intriguing observation 自然引导读者思考 the broader question。

    呈现语言多样性的极端案例
  2. 分论点 P2

    全球语言多样性分布不均

    作者将 focus 从 single island 扩展到 global scale，用 multiple examples（New Guinea vs Russia, Vanuatu vs Bangladesh）来 demonstrate 一个 key observation：语言 diversity 并非 randomly distributed，而是呈现出 dramatic geographical variations。Tropical regions 明显有 far more languages，但即使在 tropics 内部，distribution 也 varies widely。

    这个 unit 通过 scaling up the scope 来 deepen the puzzle established in introduction。它不仅 confirms 语言 diversity 的 existence，更重要的是 highlights its uneven distribution 这个 critical dimension。通过 comparative data（Russia vs New Guinea, Vanuatu vs Bangladesh），作者 emphasizes 这种 unevenness 的 magnitude，让 the central question 变得更加 compelling 和 complex。

    展示语言分布的不均衡性
  3. 分论点 P3

    研究现状揭示知识空白

    作者从 descriptive observation 转向 explanatory inquiry，明确提出了 two fundamental questions，然后 reveals a surprising fact：尽管 possible answers seem obvious（history, culture, geography），但 systematic research 极其 limited（only a dozen studies）。这些 existing studies 不仅 results varied，还面临 serious methodological challenges，especially the correlation-causation problem。

    这个 unit 是文章的 argumentative core，直接 addresses the thesis：我们 lack clear answers。它通过 contrasting intuitive explanations 与 actual research reality 来 highlight the knowledge gap。"Shocked" 这个 emotional word 强调了 gap 的 severity。Methodological challenges 的 discussion，特别是 correlation-causation issue，解释了 why clear patterns haven't emerged，为 thesis 提供了 solid support。

    指出解释缺失的研究困境
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段定位核心现象 P1

    议论文的首段通常会 present the topic 并提供 context，这篇文章的 第1段 通过 workshop experience 引出了 extreme language diversity 这个 core phenomenon，为后续的 argumentation 奠定基础。

  2. 中段识别核心问题 P2 P3

    第2段 开头直接提出 'Why so many?' 和后续的 fundamental questions，这些 explicit questions 表明文章的 focus 不是描述 phenomenon 本身，而是探讨 the lack of explanations。这是判断主旨的 critical signal。

  3. 末段捕捉对比否定 P3

    第3段 的关键句 'we have few clear answers' 和 'no clear patterns emerged' 使用了 negative language 来 emphasize the knowledge gap，这直接支持了主旨中的 'lack clear explanations' 这一 core claim。

  4. 整合论证弧线 P1 P2 P3

    这篇文章的 argumentative arc 清晰：第1段 establishes linguistic diversity as the topic，第2段 raises fundamental questions about it，第3段 argues we lack satisfactory answers。主旨不是 'languages are diverse'(mere description)，而是 'we don't understand why they're so diverse'(argumentative claim about a gap)。

主旨信号词 few clear answers P3 shocked P3 fundamental questions P3 unevenly P2 no clear patterns emerged P3

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

文章论证了尽管全球语言多样性极其丰富——超过7,000种语言在地球上分布极不均衡——但科学家们对于人类为何使用如此多的语言以及它们的分布为何差异如此显著缺乏明确的解释,凸显了我们对人类交流理解上的重大空白。
The article argues that despite extreme linguistic diversity worldwide—with over 7,000 languages unevenly distributed across the planet—scientists lack clear explanations for why humans speak so many languages and why their distribution varies so dramatically, highlighting a significant gap in our understanding of human communication.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • indigenous 本土的、土著的、原产的

    现在让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,文章讨论的是 Makelua island 上的 communities 和他们各自的 languages,这些 languages 显然是这些 communities 长期以来就使用的。然后作者扩展到 global scale,提到 Russia 的 indigenous languages,这里的 context 明确是在讨论各个 region 本身拥有的 languages,而非外来语言。结合 -ous 这个 adjective ending,我们可以推断 indigenous 是用来描述那些 originating from or naturally belonging to a particular place 的事物。所以 indigenous languages 就是指某个 region 的 native languages 或者说 original languages。

    地理文化词汇的空间语境三维分析
  • intriguing 引人入胜的、激发兴趣的、耐人寻味的

    让我们整合这些 evidence。首先,从 logical flow 看,这些 questions 被描述为能让 people easily brainstorm,说明它们具有 stimulating thought 的特性。其次,从 word formation 看,-ing ending 表明这是描述 questions 产生的某种 effect。最后,从 rhetorical purpose 看,作者想要 engage readers,所以选用的 adjective 应该是 positively characterize 这些 questions 的。综合起来,intriguing 应该是指某种 fascinating、interesting、或 arousing curiosity 的特质。

    情感效果类形容词的三层推理
  • brainstorm 集思广益、头脑风暴、自由思考产生想法

    现在让我们 synthesize。首先,从 syntactic position 和 semantic parallel with 'hypothesize',我们知道这是一个 mental activity verb。其次,compound structure 'brain + storm' 提供了一个 powerful metaphor—大脑中的风暴,暗示 ideas 的 rapid generation。最后,从 context of use 看,这发生在 formal analysis 之前,是一个 exploratory、spontaneous 的过程。因此,brainstorm 应该是指 rapidly generate multiple ideas or solutions 的过程,通常是 informal and creative 的。

    隐喻复合动词的意象解构与语境验证
  • discipline 学科、专业领域

    让我们 integrate the evidence。首先,从 parallel structure 看,disciplines 和 countries 都是用来描述 team diversity 的 dimensions,说明 disciplines 是某种 categorical division。其次,整个 academic research context 明确指向 fields of study。最后,虽然 discipline 可能有其他含义,但 plural form + 'different' + academic setting 的组合让我们 confidently conclude 这里是指 academic or scientific fields。所以 six different disciplines 就是指六个不同的 academic fields or branches of knowledge。

    多义词的语境领域过滤与语法形式锁定
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P1 P2

    作者通过 Makelua island 这个 concrete example 来 illustrate 语言多样性的 extreme nature。这个 small island 仅有 100 kilometers long，却有 40 different indigenous languages，这个 striking contrast 让读者直观感受到 linguistic diversity 的 remarkable degree，为后文探讨 why so many languages exist 这个 fundamental question 奠定了 empirical foundation。

    信号词 For example For instance Consider Take Look at such as including like namely specifically

    仿写： 当你要 argue 一个 general phenomenon 时，先找一个 vivid, specific example。比如讨论 climate change impact，与其说 'many regions affected'，不如写 'In the Maldives, a nation barely two meters above sea level, rising oceans threaten to submerge entire communities within decades'。Template: 'Consider [specific case]. In [concrete details with numbers/facts], we see [phenomenon]. This [adjective] example reveals [broader pattern].'

  • 对比论证

    P2

    作者使用 multiple stark contrasts 来 highlight linguistic diversity 的 uneven distribution。New Guinea 与 Russia 的对比 (900 languages vs 105 languages, despite Russia being 20 times larger)，Vanuatu 与 Bangladesh 的对比 (110 languages in 250,000 people vs 41 languages in 600 times greater population) 都通过 dramatic numerical disparities 强化了 the puzzle——language distribution 不遵循 geographical size 或 population size 的 logic，这 sharpens 文章要探讨的 core question: why such uneven spread?

    信号词 but yet however in contrast whereas while on the other hand conversely unlike rather than instead

    仿写： 创建 effective contrast 时，选择两个在 one dimension similar 但在 another dimension vastly different 的对象。用 measurable metrics 来 quantify the gap。比如：'While Country A, with GDP of $50,000 per capita, struggles with 15% unemployment, Country B, at merely $8,000 per capita, maintains 4% unemployment.' Template: '[Entity A], [large in dimension X], has only [small amount of Y]. Yet [Entity B], [small in dimension X], boasts [large amount of Y]. This [surprising/striking] contrast suggests [insight].'

  • 反问修辞

    P2 P3

    作者连续使用 rhetorical questions——'Why so many?' 'How come humans speak so many languages?' 'And why are they so unevenly spread?'——这些 questions 并非 seeking literal answers from readers，而是 engage readers' curiosity 和 frame the central puzzle。通过 questioning tone，作者 transforms 一个 academic observation into an intriguing mystery，然后 reveal 一个 surprising fact: 'we have few clear answers'，这 creates dramatic tension between expected knowledge 和 actual ignorance，强化了 research gap 的 significance。

    信号词 Why How come What explains How is it that What accounts for Why is it that How do we explain What makes

    仿写： 使用 rhetorical questions 来 transition from observation to analysis 或 introduce a problem。问题应该 tap into natural curiosity 且 seem obvious to ask。可以用 question series 来 build momentum。比如：'Why do some nations prosper while others languish? What separates thriving economies from struggling ones? The answers, surprisingly, remain elusive.' Template: '[Question highlighting puzzle]? [Related follow-up question]? As it turns out, [unexpected revelation about lack of clarity/consensus].'

  • 引用论证

    P1 P3

    作者 cites 'recent work by my colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History' 作为 authoritative source 来 substantiate 关于 Makelua island 有 40 different indigenous languages 的 claim。这个 reference to prestigious research institution 增强了 credibility，同时 establish 作者作为 research community insider 的 authority。Later，提到 'only a dozen previous studies' 和 'one we ourselves completed' further positions 作者在 scholarly conversation 中的 active role，使 argument 基于 rigorous academic foundation。

    信号词 According to Research by Studies show Scholars argue Experts suggest As [name] notes Evidence from Data from [Source] reveals Recent work by

    仿写： 引用时要 strategic——选择 authoritative, recognizable sources，并 integrate them smoothly into your narrative 而非 abruptly inserting。可以用 'According to' 'Research by' 'Studies from [institution] show'。比如：'According to a 2023 Stanford study, meditation reduces cortical stress markers by 23%.' 更 subtle 的方式：'Recent neuroscience research reveals that...' Template: 'According to [source/institution], [specific finding with data]. This [adjective] evidence suggests [your interpretation].'

  • 因果论证

    P3

    文章结尾处作者 identifies methodological challenges 导致 unclear patterns 的 causal chain: 'The studies also ran up against many methodological challenges, the biggest of which centered on the old statistical saying—correlation does not equal causation.' 这个 causal analysis explains why 尽管有 prior studies，我们仍然 lack clear answers。通过 pointing out the fundamental flaw in previous research approaches (confusing correlation with causation)，作者 justifies the need for new research 并 explains the persistent knowledge gap，strengthening the argument that 这个 puzzle remains unsolved。

    信号词 because since as due to owing to as a result consequently therefore thus hence leads to causes results in stems from the reason is

    仿写： 构建 causal argument 时，明确 identify cause and effect，并用 appropriate causal language。可以用 'because' 'due to' 'as a result' 'consequently' 'therefore' 'leads to' 'stems from'。比如：'Because traditional farming methods deplete soil nutrients, crop yields decline over time, consequently threatening food security.' 要确保 logical chain 清晰。Template: '[Effect/problem] occurs because [cause/reason]. This [mechanism/process] results in [consequence], which explains why [broader implication].'

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

4 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 极端语言多样性的反常现象

    P1
    Thirty people were present and all except me came from the island

    对比类 all except me except but however unlike in contrast on the contrary

    作者通过 'all except me' 这个 subtle contrast 其实在传递两层 implication:第一,作为唯一的 outsider,作者具备 objective observer 的 perspective;第二,更重要的是,这个对比 sets the stage for 接下来要揭示的 shocking fact—30个来自同一个岛的人居然 speak 16种完全不同的 languages。这个 implication 对文章主旨的 value 在于:it immediately establishes 语言多样性的 extreme nature,为后文探讨 'why so many languages' 这个 fundamental question 提供了一个 striking concrete example。这种 personal observation 的 framing 也增强了论述的 credibility 和 immediacy。

  • 视觉可及距离内的语言隔绝

    P1
    In many cases, you could stand at the edge of one village and see the outskirts of the next community. Yet the residents of each village speak a completely different language.

    转折类 Yet yet but however nevertheless nonetheless still

    'Yet' 这个转折传递的 subtext 非常关键:地理上的 immediate proximity (能看见下一个村庄) 按理说应该促进 linguistic exchange 和 convergence,但现实却是 completely different languages coexist。这个 implication reveals 语言多样性的 paradoxical nature—它 defies 我们关于 communication 和 contact 的 intuitive assumptions。对主旨的 contribution 在于:it deepens the puzzle 为什么人类有这么多语言,而且这个 concrete vivid image (站在村边就能看到另一个村) makes the mystery more 'tangible' 和 compelling。这个言外之意 reinforces 文章的 central argument:linguistic diversity 是一个 counterintuitive phenomenon 需要 scientific explanation,而非 self-evident。

  • 科学认知的巨大空白

    P3
    we were shocked that only a dozen previous studies had been done

    情态词 shocked surprised astonished striking remarkable unexpected puzzling

    'Shocked' 这个词传递的 deeper meaning 是:对于如此 fundamental 的问题 (为什么人类说这么多语言),科学界的研究 attention 严重不足。这个 emotional marker 的 implication 是双重的:一方面 highlights 现有知识的 shocking inadequacy,另一方面也 justifies 作者团队研究的 urgency 和 importance。对主旨的 role 极其关键:它 directly supports 文章的 core argument—'we have few clear answers to these fundamental questions'。通过 express genuine shock,作者让读者意识到这不是一个 minor knowledge gap,而是关于人类 communication 这样 basic 的问题竟然 remain largely unexplored。这种 implication 强化了文章的 critical stance:当前对语言多样性的理解 woefully insufficient。

  • 现有研究的根本缺陷

    P3
    The studies also ran up against many methodological challenges, the biggest of which centered on the old statistical saying—correlation does not equal causation.

    委婉表达 correlation does not equal causation methodological challenges limitations it should be noted to some extent relatively arguably

    这个看似 matter-of-fact 的 statistical truism 其实传递着 sharp criticism:之前的12个研究虽然找到了 correlations,但无法 establish causation,这意味着它们 fundamentally failed 回答 'why' 的问题。这个 implication 的 devastating nature 在于:它 invalidates 几乎所有 previous efforts—既然只是 correlation 而非 causation,那么这些研究 cannot truly explain 语言多样性的 origins。对主旨的 contribution 至关重要:它 reinforces 'we have few clear answers' 这个 central claim,不仅是研究 few in number,而且连这少数研究也存在 fatal methodological flaws,无法提供 causal explanations。这个 implication 将 knowledge gap 从 quantitative (研究少) elevate 到 qualitative (方法论缺陷),使主旨论述更加 compelling。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度：客观中立

结论先行：本文作者态度为客观中立（ curious and concerned about the lack of research）。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇语气是陈述还是主张 P1

    议论文的 opening tone 往往会 reveal author's stance，如果作者用 factual description 而不是 strong opinion statements 开头，通常说明态度偏 objective

  2. 提问后是承认未知还是给答案 P2 P3

    议论文中 rhetorical questions 的功能很关键，如果问题是 genuine inquiry 说明作者持 exploratory attitude，如果是 leading questions 就暗示 persuasive intent

  3. 承认知识局限的情感表达 P3

    议论文中作者的 meta-commentary 往往最直接地 expose attitude，承认 limitations 或 express surprise 说明作者不是在 defend a position，而是在 investigate a phenomenon

  4. 结尾强调问题而非解决方案 P1 P2 P3

    议论文的 overall structure 会 reveal argumentative intent，这篇文章的 ending focus 是 'methodological challenges' 和 'no clear patterns'，说明作者想 emphasize research inadequacy 而非 propose answers

文中的态度信号词

  • intriguing P3

    这个词 conveys intellectual curiosity 而非 emotional judgment，在议论文中 'intriguing questions' 表示作者觉得这些 questions 值得 explore，显示 engaged and open-minded attitude

    同类词 fascinating interesting puzzling curious remarkable

  • shocked P3

    这个 emotion word 表达了 author's genuine reaction to research scarcity，在议论文中用 strong emotion 来描述 discovery 显示作者对 current state 有 critical awareness 但不是 hostile

    同类词 surprised astonished struck amazed startled

  • fundamental P3

    这个词 emphasizes the importance of the questions，在议论文中用 'fundamental questions' 表示作者认为这些 issues 很 significant，配合 'few clear answers' 强化了 concern about research gap

    同类词 basic essential core key central

  • few clear answers P3

    这个 phrase 直接 acknowledges knowledge limitation，在议论文中 explicitly state 'few answers' 表示作者在 admit uncertainty 而非 present solutions，显示 honest and objective stance

    同类词 no clear patterns limited understanding insufficient research knowledge gaps uncertain

  • methodological challenges P3

    这个 technical term 表示作者在 analyze research problems from professional perspective，在议论文中提及 methodology 显示 scholarly and analytical approach 而非 emotional reaction

    同类词 research limitations difficulties problems obstacles constraints

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例，可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文？

  1. 个人经历引出待探讨现象 P1

    本文第1段以author's personal experience(研讨会见闻)开场,但立即pivot到language diversity这个broader phenomenon。这种from specific到general的structure是典型的argumentative essay pattern,用来engage reader并establish the scope of discussion。说明文会直接define语言多样性,新闻报道会report event本身而非用它引出问题。

  2. 明确提出待解答问题 P2 P3

    第2段连续抛出核心questions:'Why so many?'、'How come humans speak so many languages?'、'why are they so unevenly spread?'这些interrogatives直接expose文章的argumentative nature。作者不是在explain已知的facts(说明文),也不是reporting discoveries(新闻),而是在problematize现象并drive toward answers。

  3. 批判现有认知不足 P3

    第3段展示典型的argumentative move:'Most people can easily brainstorm possible answers'然后指出'we were shocked that only a dozen previous studies had been done'并critique这些studies('results varied a lot'、'no clear patterns emerged'、'methodological challenges')。这种对existing knowledge的critical examination是argumentation的essence,不同于说明文的neutral presentation或新闻的factual reporting。

  4. 问题探究加知识批判 P1 P2 P3

    整体architecture reveals argumentative intent:不是to inform about a settled topic(说明文的goal)也不是to report new events(新闻的function),而是to explore an unresolved question并critique current understanding。The cumulative effect of personal hook + explicit questions + critical review creates a clear argumentative trajectory that aims to convince readers这个问题needs better answers。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁？

  • Why so many? P2 问题引导词 How come Why are they What causes What explains Why does
  • We could ask P2 观点引导词 One might wonder It is worth considering We should question One must examine It is important to ask
  • As it turns out P3 立场表态词 In fact Actually Surprisingly Contrary to expectation Interestingly
  • Most people can easily brainstorm...But P3 论证逻辑连接词 But However Yet Nevertheless On the contrary
  • They hypothesize that P3 观点引导词 Some argue that It is claimed that Critics contend that Proponents suggest that The assumption is that
  • we were shocked that P3 立场表态词 it is surprising that unexpectedly to our dismay we found it puzzling that it is alarming that
  • no clear patterns emerged P3 论证逻辑连接词 the results varied there is no consensus findings are inconclusive evidence is mixed conclusions differ
  • correlation does not equal causation P3 论证逻辑连接词 A does not necessarily mean B this does not prove that merely shows association, not cause cannot conclude that insufficient evidence for
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

5 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的常见问题

2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的主旨是什么？
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章论证了尽管全球语言多样性极其丰富——超过7,000种语言在地球上分布极不均衡——但科学家们对于人类为何使用如此多的语言以及它们的分布为何差异如此显著缺乏明确的解释,凸显了我们对人类交流理解上的重大空白。（英文表述：The article argues that despite extreme linguistic diversity worldwide—with over 7,000 languages unevenly distributed across the planet—scientists lack clear explanations for why humans speak so many languages and why their distribution varies so dramatically, highlighting a significant gap in our understanding of human communication.）
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章是什么体裁？难度如何？
体裁为议论文，作者立场是客观中立（curious and concerned about the lack of research）。CEFR 难度 C1，全文 395 词、3 段；在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中，C1 级共 343 篇（占 58%）。
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的？
全文 3 段按议论文骨架分为 3 个意群：引言 · 第1段——极端语言多样性现象引入；分论点 · 第2段——全球语言多样性分布不均；分论点 · 第3段——研究现状揭示知识空白。
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的作者态度是什么？
作者态度是客观中立（curious and concerned about the lack of research）。判断路径：开篇语气是陈述还是主张 → 提问后是承认未知还是给答案 → 承认知识局限的情感表达 → 结尾强调问题而非解决方案；文中的态度信号词包括 intriguing（第3段）、shocked（第3段）、fundamental（第3段）、few clear answers（第3段）、methodological challenges（第3段）。
2018年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词？
按文中出现顺序共 4 个：indigenous（本土的、土著的、原产的）、intriguing（引人入胜的、激发兴趣的、耐人寻味的）、brainstorm（集思广益、头脑风暴、自由思考产生想法）、discipline（学科、专业领域），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新：