2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way
CET-6 · 来自 2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 · Part III Section C (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way

2021年6月英语六级真题第1套文章逐层精读

The Guardian《卫报》2019.09,08 文章The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way(《卫报》评旅游税:游客应为其旅行付费)。

本页是 2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 444 词、6 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

6 段英文原文

以下为2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 6 段。左侧 P1–P6 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way

Nicola Sturgeon's speech last Tuesday setting out the Scottish government's legislative programme for the year ahead confirmed what was already pretty clear. Scottish councils are set to be the first in the UK with the power to levy charges on visitors, with Edinburgh likely to lead the way.

Tourist taxes are not new. The Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan has a longstanding policy of charging visitors a daily fee. France's tax on overnight stays was introduced to assist thermal spa(温泉) towns to develop, and around half of French local authorities use it today.

But such levies are on the rise. Moves by Barcelona and Venice to deal with the phenomenon of "over-tourism" through the use of charges have recently gained prominence. Japan and Greece are among the countries to have recently introduced tourist taxes.

That the UK lags behind is due to our weak, by international standards, local government, as well as the opposition to taxes and regulation of our aggressively pro-market ruling party. Some UK cities have lobbied without success for the power to levy a charge on visitors. Such levies are no universal remedy as the amounts raised would be tiny compared with what has been taken away by central government since 2010. Still, it is to be hoped that the Scottish government's bold move will prompt others to act. There is no reason why visitors to the UK, or domestic tourists on holiday in hotspots such as Cornwall, should be exempt from taxation-particularly when vital local services including waste collection, park maintenance and arts and culture spending are under unprecedented strain.

On the contrary, compelling tourists to make a financial contribution to the places they visit beyond their personal consumption should be part of a wider cultural shift. Westerners with disposable incomes have often behaved as if they have a right to go wherever they choose with little regard for the consequences. Just as the environmental harm caused by aviation and other transport must come under far greater scrutiny, the social cost of tourism must also be confronted. This includes the impact of short-term lets on housing costs and quality of life for residents. Several European capitals, including Paris and Berlin, are leading a campaign for tougher regulation by the European Union. It also includes the impact of overcrowding, litter and the kinds of behaviour associated with noisy parties.

There is no "one size fits all" solution to this problem. The existence of new revenue streams for some but not all councils is complicated, and businesses are often opposed, fearing higher costs will make them uncompetitive. But those places that want them must be given the chance to make tourist taxes work.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

6 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Scotland Takes the Lead

    Scotland is set to lead the UK in introducing tourist taxes.

    本段承担 opening 的功能,它以苏格兰的实际政策动向切入全文,而不是一开始就空泛讨论 taxation。这个 concrete example 为文章“英国应跟随苏格兰征收游客税”的总论点提供了现实起点和论证对象。

    抓住政策动向
  2. P2

    Tourist Taxes Are Nothing New

    Tourist taxes are established and widely used international policies.

    本段为作者的主张建立 international legitimacy,即通过国外先例削弱读者对游客税的陌生感和疑虑。它为后文批评 UK lags behind 埋下逻辑基础:既然别国早已实践,英国的滞后便更值得反思。

    归纳国际案例
  3. P3

    A Growing Global Response

    Tourist taxes are increasingly used to tackle over-tourism worldwide.

    本段强化了文章的现实紧迫性:游客税不仅有历史先例,而且正成为全球应对 over-tourism 的新趋势。这样一来,英国若继续缺位,就显得更加 out of step,也为第四段的直接批评做好准备。

    锁定上升趋势
  4. P4

    Why the UK Should Catch Up

    Despite limitations, the UK should empower local authorities to levy tourist taxes for public services.

    这是全文的 central argumentative paragraph,它把国际经验转化为针对英国的具体政策建议。作者既避免把 tourist taxes 夸大成万能药,也以地方服务的财政压力证明其必要性,从而使立场显得 balanced yet persuasive。

    识别让步转折
  5. P5

    Making Tourists Bear the Social Cost

    Tourism's environmental and social costs require tourists to contribute and regulations to be strengthened.

    本段把全文论证提升到 moral and social responsibility 的层面,使游客税不再只是补充财政的工具。它说明征税和监管的正当性在于纠正 tourism 带来的 external costs,从而显著拓宽并加深了文章主旨。

    追踪成本扩展
  6. P6

    Local Choice, Not a Uniform Rule

    Tourist taxes should be optional local tools despite practical difficulties.

    本段以 qualified conclusion 收束全文,体现作者的立场不是简单的“全面强制征税”。它在承认商业竞争、地方财政等复杂因素后,仍坚持 local authorities 应拥有尝试 tourist taxes 的机会,使全文主张更审慎、可操作且具有政策弹性。

    转折后定结论
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

6 道逐段细节自检题

针对2021年6月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 Nicola Sturgeon's speech Scottish councils

    What did Nicola Sturgeon's speech confirm about Scottish councils?

    • A They had already introduced a nationwide tourist tax.
    • B They would replace Edinburgh as Scotland's main tourist destination.
    • C They were set to become the first UK councils able to charge visitors.
    • D They were expected to receive funding from the UK government.
    • E They had been prohibited from regulating local visitors.
    • F They planned to impose charges only on visitors to Edinburgh.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项准确改写了 set to be the first in the UK with the power to levy charges on visitors。able to charge 对应 with the power to levy charges,were set to become 保留了原文的未来预期,first UK councils 保留范围限定。障碍在于题干使用 confirm,考生容易误选已经实施收费的表述;原文实际上说的是将获得 power,而非已经普遍执行。

    三格核验 时间极紧时,直接以 Nicola Sturgeon's speech 扫描并定位到 第1段,不必先通读全文。随后采用“三格核验”:把选项压缩为 councils + 时间状态 + 收费权内容;只有正确项能让三格同时与原句的语义骨架重合。重点核对 set to 和 power,这两个小词足以淘汰多数陷阱。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 France's tax on overnight stays introduced

    Why was France's tax on overnight stays originally introduced?

    • A It was designed to limit the number of daily visitors to Bhutan.
    • B It was meant to finance all French local authorities.
    • C It was created to regulate noisy parties in tourist areas.
    • D It was intended to help thermal spa towns develop.
    • E It was introduced after half of the authorities had adopted it.
    • F It was intended to exempt overnight visitors from other taxes.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项直接同义转述 introduced to assist thermal spa towns to develop。was intended to 对应 introduced to assist,help 与 assist 同义,thermal spa towns develop 保留了政策对象和目的。障碍是题干问 originally,原文随后补充 around half of French local authorities use it today,考生若只抓住数字现状会偏离设立动机。

    遮蔽后文 用 France's tax on overnight stays 直接锁定 第2段,然后只读其后到第一个句号的内容。以 originally 为界,把 today 之后的信息暂时遮蔽;再在选项中寻找与 to assist ... to develop 同构的“目的动词 + 受益对象”组合,正确项即可快速显现。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 tourist taxes countries

    What trend regarding tourist taxes is highlighted?

    • A They are being abandoned because they fail to address over-tourism.
    • B They are limited to European cities with thermal spas.
    • C They are replacing all other forms of tourism regulation.
    • D They are imposed only on international travellers.
    • E They are becoming more widely adopted in different countries.
    • F They are concentrated in countries that have no tourism problems.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    becoming more widely adopted 概括了 on the rise,并由 Barcelona、Venice、Japan 和 Greece 的连续例证支撑。different countries 忠实保留跨国扩散的范围。障碍在于原文同时提到 over-tourism,考生可能误以为旅游税只用于处理拥挤;其实段落的主结论是税收措施正在增加。

    方向投票 先用 tourist taxes 与 countries 联合扫描,可迅速定位 第3段;随后再查找 on the rise、recently 和 introduced 等变化标记。不必细读所有国家名称,只做“方向投票”:总述与多个国家例证共同支持增长时,选择概括该共同方向的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 exempt from taxation vital local services

    Why does the writer argue that visitors should not be exempt from taxation?

    • A Tourist charges would completely replace central government funding.
    • B All UK cities have successfully lobbied for charging powers.
    • C Domestic tourists already pay more tax than foreign visitors.
    • D Tourism is the only source of funding for parks and culture.
    • E The Scottish government has removed all local taxes since 2010.
    • F Vital local services are under unprecedented strain.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项直接复现作者在 particularly when 之后给出的理由:vital local services,包括 waste collection、park maintenance 以及 arts and culture spending,正处于 unprecedented strain。它只陈述原文明示的服务压力,没有额外断言这种压力完全由 tourism 导致。障碍在于段中还有 central government cuts 和 tiny revenue,二者是政策背景与局限,不是支持“不应免税”的直接表述。

    右读因果 先用 exempt from taxation 这个低频短语直达 第4段 的末句,再从该短语向右读取到句末,而非回头重读整段。把选项分为“理由”和“背景事实”两栏:能解释立场成立的归入理由栏,正确项位于其中;只说明制度障碍、资金缺口或游说经历的选项一律剔除。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 wider cultural shift part of

    What should be part of a wider cultural shift in tourism?

    • A Tourists should contribute financially beyond their personal consumption.
    • B Tourists should be free to travel without regard for consequences.
    • C Aviation should be exempt from environmental scrutiny.
    • D Only European capitals should regulate short-term lets.
    • E Visitors should pay only for the goods they personally consume.
    • F Housing costs should be ignored when tourism is assessed.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项精确保留 compelling tourists、financial contribution、beyond personal consumption 三个核心语义。should 把原文的 compelling 转换为规范性要求,financially 对应 financial contribution。障碍是段落列出多项 tourism costs,考生容易误选监管 short-term lets 或减少 litter 等具体措施;这些是社会成本的内容,不是文化转变所包含的总原则。

    主句截取 无需通读本段的所有社会问题;用 wider cultural shift 直接定位 第5段 后,只读取所在句的主干,并以 beyond 作为边界校验。将选项中涉及具体领域的内容先全部标记为 example,再在剩余的原则性表述中锁定正确项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 places that want businesses

    What does the writer conclude despite the concerns about tourist taxes?

    • A Every council should be required to adopt the same tourist tax.
    • B Places that want tourist taxes should be allowed to make them work.
    • C Tourist taxes should be abandoned because businesses oppose them.
    • D Only councils with new revenue streams may introduce charges.
    • E Businesses should determine local tax policy on their own.
    • F Tourist taxes can solve every local funding problem.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项忠实改写 Those places that want them must be given the chance to make tourist taxes work。should be allowed 对应 must be given the chance,places that want tourist taxes 保留了自愿和地方差异的条件。障碍是段首 no one size fits all 容易让考生误以为作者反对任何实施;实际含义是反对统一方案,而非反对地方自主尝试。

    But后定案 先用 businesses 定位到 第6段 的担忧句,再直接从 But 开始读到段末,把 But 之前内容视作“让步证据池”,不逐项翻译。随后以 places that want 核验适用主体,在选项中寻找同时保留条件范围和允许性语气的正确项;把结论改成全面强制或全面取消的选项均可快速排除。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

5 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    苏格兰率先推行游客税

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 Nicola Sturgeon 的 speech 引出了 Scottish government 即将实施 tourist tax 的 legislative programme,其中 Edinburgh 很可能成为 the first city to levy charges on visitors

    作为 introduction,这个 paragraph 直接 present 了文章的 core topic,即 Scotland 将要 implement tourist taxes,为后续的 argumentation 和 discussion 建立了 contextual foundation

    引出政策实施主体
  2. 分论点 P2 P3

    游客税的国际先例

    这两个 paragraphs 通过 citing international examples 来 demonstrate that tourist taxes are not a new concept。从 Bhutan 的 longstanding policy 到 France 的 thermal spa development,再到 Barcelona、Venice、Japan 和 Greece 的 recent moves,这些 evidence 显示 the rising trend of such levies globally

    作为第一个 supporting section,这个 unit 通过 establishing international precedent 来 legitimize 游客税的 implementation。它 normalize the concept by showing that many countries have adopted it,从而为后续 argue UK should follow suit 提供了 credibility 和 contextual support

    提供国际实践证据
  3. 分论点 P4

    英国落后的原因与必要性

    这个 paragraph 先 explain 为什么 UK lags behind in implementing tourist taxes,指出 weak local government 和 pro-market ruling party 的 opposition。然后 argue 尽管 raised amounts 相比 what's been taken away 显得 tiny,但 Scottish government 的 bold move 应该 prompt others to act,因为 visitors 不应该 be exempt from taxation,特别是当 vital local services 面临 unprecedented strain 的时候

    这个 unit 完成了从 international context 到 UK-specific situation 的 transition。它不仅 diagnose 为什么 UK 没有 adopt tourist taxes,还 make a direct argument 说明为什么应该 implement them,特别强调了 local services 的 financial strain。这为文章的 central claim 提供了 practical justification

    分析现状提出呼吁
  4. 分论点 P5

    更深层的文化转变需求

    这个 paragraph 通过 'On the contrary' 进一步 deepen the argument,指出 compelling tourists to make financial contribution 应该是 a wider cultural shift 的一部分。它 criticize Westerners 的 entitled behavior,强调不仅 environmental harm from aviation 需要 scrutiny,tourism 的 social cost 也必须 be confronted,包括 short-term lets 对 housing costs 的 impact 以及 overcrowding 和 noisy parties 等 problems

    这个 unit 将 argument 从 practical level (funding local services) 提升到 moral and cultural level。它 argue that tourist taxes 不只是 revenue tool,更是 addressing broader social and cultural issues 的手段。通过 expand the scope 到 environmental and social costs,这个 segment 为 tourist tax policy 提供了更 profound justification

    揭示深层问题
  5. 结论 P6

    承认复杂性但主张实施

    这个 concluding paragraph 承认 'no one size fits all solution' 这个 reality,同时指出 new revenue streams 的 existence 是 complicated 的,businesses 也 often opposed due to competitiveness concerns。但最终 reaffirm 核心 position:those places that want tourist taxes 必须 be given the chance to make them work

    作为 conclusion,这个 unit 通过 acknowledge counterarguments and complications 来 demonstrate balanced thinking,然后 restate the central claim with qualified support。它不是 simple repetition of the thesis,而是 nuanced conclusion that recognizes challenges while maintaining the core advocacy position

    平衡立场重申主张
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 识别政策事件引入 P1

    议论文的 opening 常常用 concrete event 来 anchor 整个 discussion,第一段提到的 Scottish government's legislative programme 和 levy charges on visitors 就是一个 policy announcement,它为后续的 argumentation 设定了 context。这种 factual opening 是议论文 establish topic 的典型方式。

  2. 区分背景与论证段 P2 P3

    第二和第三段都在 provide examples(Bhutan, France, Barcelona, Venice, Japan, Greece),使用 are not new、on the rise 这样的 descriptive language。这些段落的 function 是 contextualize the issue 和 show trends,不是 advance the author's position。能够快速识别这些 supporting paragraphs 可以让我们 skip details 直接 locate 真正的 argument。

  3. 捕捉评价性语言 P4

    第四段出现了明显的 argumentation markers:lags behind(negative evaluation)、weak local government(criticism)、it is to be hoped(prescriptive stance)、there is no reason why... should be exempt(strong argument)。这些 expressions 表明作者不再是 neutral reporting,而是 taking a position 和 making recommendations。这种 shift in tone 是 locate main argument 的关键 signal。

  4. 定位原则性论述 P5

    第五段用 on the contrary 开头,这是一个 strong discourse marker 表示作者要 present 更 fundamental argument。这段从 specific policy(tourist tax)延伸到 wider cultural shift 和 behavioral critique(Westerners... behaved as if they have a right),并且连续使用 must(must come under scrutiny, must be confronted),显示这是 core argument 的 deepening 和 philosophical grounding。

  5. 合成多层论点 P1 P4 P5 P6

    通过前面步骤我们 identified:第一段 introduce policy(Scotland implementing tourist tax),第四段 argue UK should follow(with specific reasons),第五段 expand to broader cultural argument(tourists should contribute beyond consumption)。主旨就是这些 elements 的 integration——既包含 specific recommendation(follow Scotland's lead, implement taxes),又包含 underlying issues(over-tourism, strained services),还包含 deeper principle(financial contribution beyond personal consumption)。这种 multi-layered thesis 是典型的 policy-oriented argumentative essay。

主旨信号词 should follow P4 it is to be hoped P4 there is no reason why P4 on the contrary P5 must be confronted P5 should be part of P5

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

文章主张英国应效仿苏格兰实施旅游税,以应对过度旅游并资助紧张的地方服务,倡导游客在个人消费之外做出财政贡献,同时承认此类政策的复杂性。
The article argues that the UK should follow Scotland's lead in implementing tourist taxes to address over-tourism and fund strained local services, advocating for tourists to contribute financially beyond personal consumption while acknowledging the complexity of such policies.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • levy 征收(税费)

    我们先看到levy在第1段中与charges搭配,表示一个施加的动作。然后第4段告诉我们这个动作需要power才能执行,并且和taxation相关联。最后第3段中such levies明确指代tourist taxes。将这三条线索串联:levy charge需要权力→与taxation相关→levies就是taxes。这样一条完整的推理链就形成了:levy就是政府征收税费的正式表达。

    搭配词+指代关系+主题域定位
  • lobby 游说、向(政府)请愿

    首先我们看到cities lobbied for the power这个结构,说明lobby是为了获取某种权力。Without success告诉我们这是一种努力但不保证成功的行为。结合weak local government和opposition的政治背景,我们可以推断lobby是地方政府向中央政府寻求政策改变的正式活动。这是一个典型的政治术语,表示游说、请愿的行为。

    主体+目标+结果标记+权力结构
  • prominence 显著地位、突出

    我们先从搭配关系入手:某些城市的措施gained prominence,gained说明这是一个状态的获得。结合Barcelona和Venice这些城市的举措在文中被特别提及,说明prominence指的是受到关注、变得重要的状态。再从构词法验证:prominent(显著的)加上名词后缀-ence,确认prominence就是'突出地位、显著性'的意思。两条线索相互印证,推断准确。

    搭配动词+词根后缀双验证
  • scrutiny 仔细审查、详细检查

    首先我们看到environmental harm must come under scrutiny这个表达,must说明这是必要的,come under说明这是一个被动接受的过程。Far greater表明scrutiny的强度可以调节,意味着这是一种检查或审视。然后我们看到also be confronted这个并列结构,confront(正视)与scrutiny形成呼应,说明scrutiny也是一种认真对待问题的方式。综合起来,scrutiny就是'仔细审查、严密监督'的意思。

    介词搭配+并列类比+程度修饰
  • exempt 免除、豁免

    首先我们识别be exempt from这个结构,from暗示exempt表示被排除、分离出来。然后看整体论证逻辑:作者认为visitors不应该be exempt from taxation,结合前文大力支持tourist taxes,可以推断exempt就是'被免除'的意思。Particularly when引导的原因状语进一步确认:地方服务压力大,所以游客更不应该被exempt(免除纳税义务)。三条线索形成完整推理链:固定搭配+论证立场+因果关系。

    固定搭配+作者立场+因果验证
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P2 P3 P5

    作者列举 Bhutan 的 daily fee、France 的 overnight-stay tax,以及 Barcelona、Venice、Japan 和 Greece 等案例,用多个国际事实说明 tourist taxes 并非激进的新政策,而是已经被广泛实践的治理工具。这样由 abroad 的成功或既有做法反观 UK 的滞后,能够增强“英国应允许地方征收旅游税”这一主张的可信度与现实可行性。

    信号词 such as for example for instance including like among A and B take ... as an example

    仿写: 写作时先追问自己:我的观点是否只是一个 general claim,读者凭什么相信它?随后选择二至三个最典型、最有代表性的 examples,并让每个例子都服务于同一结论,而不是简单堆砌国家或人物。仿写模版是:Many places, such as A and B, have adopted X; these cases show that 中文观点 is both practical and necessary.

  • 因果论证

    P4 P5

    在 第4段 中,作者把 UK 的落后归因于 weak local government 和 ruling party 对 taxes and regulation 的反对;在 第5段 中,作者又指出短租会影响 housing costs 与 residents' quality of life。这样的 cause-and-effect 链条把“征收旅游税、加强监管”的结论,建立在旅游业造成财政与社会压力这一原因基础上。

    信号词 due to because since as a result therefore thus lead to result in cause consequently so that

    仿写: 写作前可以连续追问:这个问题的 root cause 是什么,这种原因带来了什么 consequence,而我的政策为何能切断或缓解这条链?注意不要把时间上的先后误当成因果,最好补充机制性解释。仿写模版是:Because A leads to B, and B places pressure on C, the government should adopt X to reduce this problem.

  • 对比论证

    P3 P4 P5

    作者先说 tourist taxes “are not new”且在多国实行,随后用 “But” 转入 UK lags behind,形成“国际普遍推进”与“英国明显落后”的鲜明 contrast。第4段 中 “no universal remedy” 与 “Still” 也构成让步后的转折:旅游税虽不能解决全部财政问题,却仍值得推行。

    信号词 but however while whereas in contrast on the contrary instead still yet rather than

    仿写: 你可以先确定一个有张力的 comparison,例如“短期成本”对“长期收益”或“国内现状”对“国际经验”;然后明确说明差异最终支持哪一个立场。写作时尤其要学习 concession 的结构,即先承认局限,再用转折推进主张。仿写模版是:While X may not solve every problem, it is still better than Y because it can achieve Z.

  • 排比修辞

    P4 P5

    作者在 第4段 连续列出 waste collection、park maintenance、arts and culture spending 等受压服务,又在 第5段 并列 short-term lets、overcrowding、litter 和 noisy parties 等旅游后果。这样的 parallel listing 将“旅游给地方带来负担”具体化、可视化,使读者感到问题不是单一 inconvenience,而是一组累积的公共成本。

    信号词 including such as and as well as not only ... but also first, second, third on the one hand ... on the other hand both ... and ...

    仿写: 仿写时先用一个总括句提出问题,再选取同一层级的三项左右内容进行 parallel expression;例如都写“公共服务”、都写“环境后果”,不要把原因、例子和结论混在一个列表里。你可以追问:如果删去其中一项,论证是否仍完整?若每一项都从不同侧面加重同一判断,排比就有效。仿写模版是:Tourism puts pressure on A, B, and C, making it necessary for visitors to contribute more.

  • 比喻修辞

    P6

    “There is no ‘one size fits all’ solution” 借服装尺码的日常经验,比喻旅游税政策不能用同一标准套用于所有地方。这个 familiar image 一方面承认不同 councils 的财政、旅游规模和商业环境存在差异,另一方面避免读者误解作者是在主张僵化的统一征税方案,从而让其政策立场更细致、更具可操作性。

    信号词 one size fits all a double-edged sword a slippery slope a bridge a barrier a burden the backbone of serve as

    仿写: 仿写前先问:我要解释的抽象问题,能否借一个读者熟悉的 daily-life image 来说明?比喻必须与论点的关键属性对应,例如这里的 size 对应政策适配性,而不能只追求新奇。仿写模版是:There is no one-size-fits-all solution to X, because different places face different conditions and needs.

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 苏格兰旅游税政策的必然性

    P1
    confirmed what was already pretty clear

    模糊限制语 confirmed what was already pretty clear already pretty clear obviously it goes without saying needless to say naturally as expected

    表面上作者只是在 report Sturgeon 的 speech,但通过 already pretty clear 这个 phrase,实际传递的 implication 是:旅游税 implementation 不是 if 的问题,而是 when 的问题,这已经是 inevitable trend。这为全文 argument 奠定了 foundation,让读者从一开始就 accept 旅游税的 legitimacy 和 necessity,serves 文章 advocating for tourist taxes 的核心 thesis。

  • 英国落后于国际标准的制度性原因

    P4
    That the UK lags behind is due to our weak, by international standards, local government, as well as the opposition to taxes and regulation of our aggressively pro-market ruling party

    因果关系强调 That the UK lags behind is due to is due to stems from results from is attributable to is caused by owes to

    表面在 explain UK 为何 lag behind,实则通过 weak local government 和 aggressively pro-market ruling party 这些 critical terms 传递强烈的 political critique。Implication 是 UK 的 backwardness 不是 coincidence,而是 systemic problems 和 ideological obstacles 的 result。这为文章后续 call for change 提供了 justification:要 implement tourist taxes 就必须 overcome 这些 structural barriers,reinforces 作者 advocating for policy reform 的 urgency。

  • 中央政府削减资金的严重性

    P4
    Such levies are no universal remedy as the amounts raised would be tiny compared with what has been taken away by central government since 2010

    让步转折类 no universal remedy as the amounts raised would be tiny compared with what has been taken away no universal remedy not a panacea no magic bullet not a complete solution admittedly granted

    表面在 admit 旅游税 revenue 有限,实则通过 compared with what has been taken away 这个 comparison 传递更 critical 的 message:真正的 problem 不是旅游税能 raise 多少钱,而是 central government 从 2010 年以来的 drastic cuts。Since 2010 这个 time marker 直接指向 Conservative government 的 austerity policies。这个 implication 既为旅游税 justify(local government 需要 alternative revenue),又 escalate 了 critique 的 level,将 discussion 从 tourist taxes 提升到 broader fiscal policy 和 government accountability 的层面,serves 文章 systemic critique 的 deeper agenda。

  • 游客免税特权的不合理性

    P4
    There is no reason why visitors to the UK, or domestic tourists on holiday in hotspots such as Cornwall, should be exempt from taxation-particularly when vital local services including waste collection, park maintenance and arts and culture spending are under unprecedented strain

    反问否定类 There is no reason why there is no reason why why should there's no justification for it makes no sense that there's no excuse for how can one justify

    表面在 question 游客 exemption 的 logic,实则通过 no reason + particularly when 的 structure 传递强烈的 moral judgment:在 local services 面临 unprecedented strain 的情况下,游客 enjoy tax exemption 是 fundamentally unfair。Implication 是现行 system 存在 structural injustice:residents 承担 tax burden 而 tourists consume services 却不 contribute。这个 argument 不仅 justify 旅游税,更将其 frame 为 issue of fairness and social justice,elevates 讨论到 ethical dimension,强化文章 calling for tourists to make financial contribution 的 moral imperative。

  • 西方游客行为方式的文化批判

    P5
    Westerners with disposable incomes have often behaved as if they have a right to go wherever they choose with little regard for the consequences

    委婉表达类 as if they have a right to as if as though act like behave as if seem to think appear to believe

    表面在 describe Western tourists 的 behavior pattern,实则通过 as if they have a right 这个 structure 传递 sharp cultural critique:这种 entitlement mentality 是 presumptuous 和 problematic 的。With disposable incomes、little regard for consequences 等 phrases 构建了一幅 privileged、irresponsible tourism 的 image。Implication 是需要 fundamental cultural shift,不仅是 financial contribution,更是 mindset transformation:从 consumerist entitlement 转向 responsible engagement。这为文章 advocating for wider cultural shift 和 confronting social cost of tourism 提供了 ideological foundation,serves broader argument about rethinking tourism ethics。

  • 旅游税实施的复杂性与灵活性需求

    P6
    There is no 'one size fits all' solution to this problem. The existence of new revenue streams for some but not all councils is complicated, and businesses are often opposed, fearing higher costs will make them uncompetitive

    模糊限制语 There is no 'one size fits all' solution no one size fits all it depends case by case context-dependent there's no simple answer it varies

    表面在 acknowledge 旅游税 implementation 的 complexity 和 opposition,实则通过 those places that want them must be given the chance 这个 emphatic conclusion 传递坚定的 advocacy stance。Implication 是:虽然 implementation 会 face challenges,但这不是 rejection 的理由,而是需要 flexible、localized approaches 的 justification。作者通过 demonstrating awareness of practical difficulties 来 strengthen 而非 weaken argument,传递的 message 是:complexity 应该 lead to adaptive implementation,not abandonment。这个 balanced 但 ultimately assertive 的 tone serves 文章 calling for action while acknowledging real-world constraints 的 pragmatic advocacy 目标。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Supportive Advocacy (with pragmatic nuance))。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 首尾定调 P1 P6

    议论文常见结构是'总-分-总',作者的核心attitude往往在introduction埋下伏笔,在conclusion处收束,所以首尾段是判断态度最快的切入口。

  2. 转折词定位 P4 P5

    议论文作者习惯先摆fact事实、再亮观点opinion,转折词就是这两部分的分水岭,抓住它能迅速定位attitude真正落脚的位置。

  3. 词汇褒贬扫描 P4 P5

    议论文作者常通过lexical choice词汇选择暗示立场,褒义词多倾向support支持,贬义词多倾向criticism批判,must/should等情态动词还能反映呼吁的intensity强度。

  4. 三步证据整合 P1 P4 P5 P6

    议论文的attitude往往是多维度的,只靠单一线索容易误判成纯neutral或过度enthusiastic,需要structure结构、transition转折、lexicon词汇三条证据链交叉验证才能精准。

文中的态度信号词

  • bold move P4

    作者用'bold move'来evaluate评价苏格兰政府推出tourist tax的举措,直接给出praise赞赏色彩,暗示这是值得肯定的先行行动。

    同类词 bold courageous pioneering groundbreaking

  • it is to be hoped that P4

    这个hope虚拟语气结构表达作者期待苏格兰的做法能prompt推动其他地区效仿,是explicit显性的advocacy倡导信号。

    同类词 hopefully one hopes it would be desirable that

  • no reason why...should be exempt P4

    这个否定反问结构强力驳斥了'游客应该免税'的对立观点,表明作者认为对游客征税是完全justified合理的。

    同类词 no reason why there is no excuse for cannot justify should not be exempt

  • must P5

    'must come under far greater scrutiny'和'must also be confronted'中反复出现的must,显示作者以strong tone强烈语气呼吁社会审视tourism的环境和社会成本。

    同类词 have to it is imperative that need to

  • On the contrary P5

    这个转折词引出全文态度最鲜明的核心观点——征税应是更广泛cultural shift文化转变的一部分,是作者立场最集中的爆发点。

    同类词 on the contrary in contrast however yet

  • aggressively pro-market P4

    'aggressively pro-market'带有明显negative connotation贬义色彩,暗示作者对UK执政党抗拒征税、抗拒regulation监管的做法持批评态度。

    同类词 aggressively weak lags behind unprecedented strain

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开篇政策议题 P1

    第1段 直接提到 Scottish government's legislative programme 和 power to levy charges on visitors,这是一个 policy debate 的 topic。如果是说明文,会 explain what tourist tax is;如果是新闻,会 focus on the event itself。但这里明显是在 set up 一个需要 argue 的 position。

  2. 国际案例佐证 P2 P3

    第2段 和 第3段 列举了 Bhutan, France, Barcelona, Venice, Japan, Greece 等地的 tourist tax practices。这不是 purely informative explanation,而是在 build a case,证明 tourist taxes 是 a growing trend。这种 comparative structure 是 argumentation 的典型特征。

  3. 归因与主张 P4

    第4段 明确使用了 'That the UK lags behind is due to' 进行 causal analysis,还有 'it is to be hoped' 和 'There is no reason why' 这种 strong evaluative stance。这些都是 author's opinion 和 judgment,不是 objective description 或 news reporting。

  4. 规范性呼吁 P5

    第5段 充满了 normative language:'should be part of', 'must come under scrutiny', 'must also be confronted'。这是在 advocate for change,要求 tourists 和 society 改变 behavior。说明文不会 prescribe action,新闻不会 call for change。

  5. 辩证性结论 P6

    第6段 承认 'no one size fits all solution' (acknowledging complexity),但坚持 'those places that want them must be given the chance' (maintaining position)。这种 nuanced but firm conclusion 是 argumentative writing 的标志,不同于说明文的 summary 或新闻的 final fact。

  6. 整篇文章从头到尾都在 argue that UK should adopt tourist taxes,每个段落都 serve this argumentative purpose:establish context → show precedent → analyze causes → advocate change → address objections。这种 tight argumentative structure 与说明文的 informational structure 和新闻的 inverted pyramid structure 完全不同。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • should be P4 立场表态词 must be ought to need to it is necessary that it is essential that
  • There is no reason why P4 观点引导词 There is no excuse for It is unreasonable to It makes no sense that There is no justification for One cannot argue that
  • On the contrary P5 论证逻辑连接词 However Nevertheless Conversely In contrast Rather
  • must also be confronted P5 立场表态词 must be confronted must be addressed needs to be tackled requires immediate attention demands action
  • it is to be hoped that P4 立场表态词 it is desirable that one can only hope that ideally preferably it would be better if
  • should be part of P5 立场表态词 must be integrated into ought to be included in needs to be incorporated into should constitute must form part of
  • must come under far greater scrutiny P5 立场表态词 must come under scrutiny requires close examination demands investigation needs to be questioned warrants critical analysis
  • There is no 'one size fits all' solution P6 观点引导词 There is no one size fits all There is no simple solution There is no easy answer The solution is not straightforward It is not a simple matter of
  • must be given the chance P6 立场表态词 must be allowed to should be permitted to deserve the opportunity to have the right to ought to be enabled to
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

12 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 的常见问题

2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 文章 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 的原文出自哪里?
The Guardian《卫报》2019.09,08 文章The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way(《卫报》评旅游税:游客应为其旅行付费)。
2021年6月英语六级真题第1套文章 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 的主旨是什么?
2021年6月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section C (2) 文章 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 主张英国应效仿苏格兰实施旅游税,以应对过度旅游并资助紧张的地方服务,倡导游客在个人消费之外做出财政贡献,同时承认此类政策的复杂性。(英文表述:The article argues that the UK should follow Scotland's lead in implementing tourist taxes to address over-tourism and fund strained local services, advocating for tourists to contribute financially beyond personal consumption while acknowledging the complexity of such policies.)
The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way(2021年6月英语六级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是积极支持(Supportive Advocacy (with pragmatic nuance))。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 444 词、6 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2021年6月英语六级真题第1套文章 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 6 段按议论文骨架分为 5 个意群:引言 · 第1段——苏格兰率先推行游客税;分论点 · 第2段、第3段——游客税的国际先例;分论点 · 第4段——英国落后的原因与必要性;分论点 · 第5段——更深层的文化转变需求;结论 · 第6段——承认复杂性但主张实施。
The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Supportive Advocacy (with pragmatic nuance))。判断路径:首尾定调 → 转折词定位 → 词汇褒贬扫描 → 三步证据整合;文中的态度信号词包括 bold move(第4段)、it is to be hoped that(第4段)、no reason why...should be exempt(第4段)、must(第5段)、On the contrary(第5段)、aggressively pro-market(第4段)。
2021年6月英语六级真题第1套文章 The Guardian View on Tourist Taxes : Travellers Should Pay Their Way 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:levy(征收(税费))、lobby(游说、向(政府)请愿)、prominence(显著地位、突出)、scrutiny(仔细审查、详细检查)、exempt(免除、豁免),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: