懒笔记
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1)
Postgraduate · 来自 2018年考研英语一真题 · Section II Part A (1) · 阅读理解（四选一）

2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1)

议论文 · 阅读理解（四选一） · 真题文章逐层精读

Bloomberg2015年5月12日社论文章:Robots Versus the Middle Class(机器人 VS中产阶级)。

本页是 2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 449 词、7 段，CEFR 难度 C1（C1 级在考研英语一文章中占 90%），作者立场为「积极支持」；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他考研英语真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

7 段英文原文

以下为2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 的阅读理解（四选一）原文，共 7 段。左侧 P1–P7 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

Among the annoying challenges facing the middle class is one that will probably go unmentioned in the next presidential campaign: What happens when the robots come for their jobs?

Don't dismiss that possibility entirely. About half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated, according to a University of Oxford study, with the middle class disproportionately squeezed. Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don't appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations – trucking, financial advice, software engineering – have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.

This isn't to be alarmist. Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn't go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.

The first step, as Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee argue in The Second Machine Age, should be rethinking education and job training. Curriculums – from grammar school to college – should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication. Vocational schools should do a better job of fostering problem-solving skills and helping students work alongside robots. Online education can supplement the traditional kind. It could make extra training and instruction affordable. Professionals trying to acquire new skills will be able to do so without going into debt.

The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier. In previous eras of drastic technological change, entrepreneurs smoothed the transition by dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines. The best uses of 3D printers and virtual reality haven't been invented yet. The U.S. needs the new companies that will invent them.

Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought. Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.

Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation. Destroying the machines that are coming for our jobs would be nuts. But policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

7 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2018年考研英语一真题 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读，并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    An Overlooked Threat: Robots and the Middle Class

    The article opens with a provocative question about automation threatening middle-class jobs, a pressing issue largely absent from political discourse.

    这一段虽然还没有给出具体的solution，但它承担着为整篇argumentative essay定调的作用，把automation和middle class这两个关键词绑定在一起，为后文展开威胁分析、evidence呈现以及最终的policy建议铺好了逻辑起点。

    设问式开篇找议题
  2. P2

    Who Gets Hit: The Uneven Impact of Automation

    Statistical evidence shows automation disproportionately threatens middle-class jobs, while low-income work stays safe and the wealthy who own the technology benefit.

    这一段用concrete data把首段的question转化为一个可信的premise，确立了automation对middle class威胁的真实性和严重性，是整篇文章problem-setting阶段的核心证据支柱。

    数据加对比论证
  3. P3

    Lessons from History: Long-Term Gains, Short-Term Pain

    History suggests automation eventually benefits workers, but the article concedes that middle-class workers will need substantial help during the transition.

    这一段是全文结构上的turning point，它用历史类比给读者信心（automation不是绝对的坏事），但同时用but转折明确指出medium term需要help，这直接为后面三段的policy solutions提供了逻辑必要性的支撑。

    让步转折找枢纽
  4. P4

    Solution One: Rethinking Education and Training

    The first proposed solution is reforming education and job training to prioritize creativity and affordable skill development.

    这一段是文章主旨中education reform focusing on creativity这一分支的直接展开，标志着文章正式从problem分析进入solution阶段，是三大solution中的第一个支柱。

    首个方案配权威引证
  5. P5

    Solution Two: Reviving Entrepreneurship

    The second solution calls for reviving entrepreneurship and easing business creation so new companies can invent ways to combine labor with emerging technologies.

    这一段对应文章主旨中encouraging entrepreneurship to create new opportunities这一分支，是三大solution中的第二个支柱，强化了automation威胁并非无解，而是可以通过新公司的创新来化解。

    历史经验配具体举例
  6. P6

    Solution Three: Reforming Taxes and the Safety Net

    The third solution proposes restructuring taxes and the safety net, cutting low-wage labor taxes and expanding wage subsidies to reduce inequality.

    这一段完成了文章主旨中restructuring tax policies to reduce inequality这一分支，作为三大solution的最后一个支柱，使education、entrepreneurship、tax policy三方面形成完整的policy闭环。

    因果链配收尾举措
  7. P7

    Conclusion: Adapt, Don't Resist

    The conclusion rejects resisting automation and reaffirms that adaptive policies are essential to help workers navigate the transition.

    这一段是全文的收束句，把前面三个solution段落汇总为一个统一的呼吁——policy adaptation而非resistance才是应对automation威胁的正确路径，完整呼应了文章主旨中mitigate these challenges的核心立场。

    回应历史再升华立场
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

7 道逐段细节自检题

针对2018年考研英语一真题这篇原文，每段配 1 道细节题（ 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ，由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制，非试卷原题）。 选项默认中性；点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法，现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 next presidential campaign robots

    What concern is likely to receive little attention in the next presidential campaign?

    • A The shortage of lower-income service jobs.
    • B The high cost of running a presidential campaign.
    • C The prospect of robots displacing middle-class workers.
    • D The failure of rich people to invest in new technology.
    • E The replacement of all human workers by machines.
    • F The declining popularity of manual work.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    第1段 先用 annoying challenges 界定问题性质，随后以 What happens when the robots come for their jobs? 展开该 challenge。正确项将 robots、jobs 和 middle class 压缩为 prospect of displacement，属于忠实的概括性改写。障碍在于原文使用疑问句，选项改为名词短语；考生必须把 come for their jobs 理解为威胁或夺走工作，而非字面上的来到工作地点。

    竞选短语秒定位 时间极紧时，直接用题干中的 next presidential campaign 在全文做视觉扫描，立即定位 第1段；不要逐句翻译。随后把该句视为一个问号结构，只找能回答其核心疑问、且同时含技术威胁与职业对象的选项。以正确项为准，采用问句压缩还原，而非逐项全文精读。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 disproportionately squeezed automation

    Why are middle-class workers described as being disproportionately squeezed by automation?

    • A They are less willing than poor workers to learn new skills.
    • B Their jobs are mainly in gardening and day care.
    • C They are more likely to own the robots that replace workers.
    • D Many middle-class occupations are especially vulnerable to automation.
    • E Automation has already eliminated half of all U.S. jobs.
    • F Robots prefer physically demanding jobs to professional work.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    第2段 明确指出 many middle-class occupations 已经或即将引起 robots 的兴趣，并列举 trucking、financial advice、software engineering。这正解释了为何 middle class 被 disproportionately squeezed：其职业集合的 automation risk 更高。障碍在于原文没有直接使用 vulnerable，而选项用 especially vulnerable 概括 high risk 和职业列举，是典型同义替换。

    职业风险对照尺 紧张状态下，不必先读所有职业例子。用 disproportionately squeezed 直接定位 第2段，随后只画出不同职业类别之间的风险比较骨架。以正确项为准，执行比较方向验算：能解释中产风险更高者保留，出现群体错置、风险与事实混淆或所有权偷换者立即剔除。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 Industrial Revolution productivity

    What reservation does the author express about the benefits of automation?

    • A Automation will reduce productivity in the long run.
    • B The Industrial Revolution created fewer jobs than it destroyed.
    • C Only workers doing hard and boring work will be affected.
    • D Optimists reject all forms of government assistance.
    • E Workers may need substantial help during the medium-term adjustment.
    • F Price reductions will fail to stimulate demand.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：E

    第3段 并未否认 automation 最终能提高 productivity 和 living standards，却明确以 But 限定：in the medium term，middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting。正确项保留了 medium-term、workers、may 与 help 等关键信息。障碍在于 substantial help 对 a lot of help 的同义改写，以及 adjustment 对 adjusting 的词性转换。

    转折时间切片 最快路径是扫描 option 中的 Industrial Revolution 或 productivity，直接定位 第3段，再寻找表达作者限制条件的逻辑转折。然后以正确项为准，使用时间轴切片法：区分长期判断与中期限制，并核对对象和情态强度，避免把阶段性困难扩大成对长期趋势的全盘否定。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 education creativity and complex communication

    What change in education is proposed to prepare people for an automated economy?

    • A It should require students to memorize more technical facts.
    • B It should replace traditional schools entirely with online courses.
    • C It should discourage students from working alongside robots.
    • D It should make professional retraining more expensive.
    • E It should focus exclusively on vocational skills.
    • F It should emphasize creativity and complex communication rather than fact memorization.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：F

    第4段 对 curriculum 的建议是 focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication。正确项完整保留了能力重心的取舍关系，也准确表达教育改革的方向。障碍在于原文的 less...more... 被改写为 emphasize...rather than...；若只看到 memorizing facts，容易误选比较方向相反的选项。

    少A多B箭头 时间最少时，以 education 为词族入口，直接扫描 第4段 的 Curriculums 句，再使用 correct option 中的具体能力短语完成核对。以正确项为准，采用比较级箭头法：看到 less A and more B，就检查选项是否保持从 A 到 B 的同向关系，反向或绝对替代项立刻排除。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 starting new companies made easier

    Why does the author argue that starting new companies should be made easier?

    • A Entrepreneurs can develop new ways to combine labor with emerging technologies.
    • B New companies can prevent all technological change.
    • C Entrepreneurs should replace labor with machines as quickly as possible.
    • D The best uses of 3D printers have already been discovered.
    • E Business dynamism mainly depends on higher taxes.
    • F Virtual reality has made vocational schools unnecessary.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：A

    第5段 用 previous eras 的经验说明，entrepreneurs 曾通过 dreaming up ways to combine labor and machines 来缓冲技术转型；接着指出 3D printers 和 virtual reality 的最佳用途尚未被发明。因此，便利创业的理由在于新公司能够创造新的技术应用与劳动组合。障碍在于 emerging technologies 概括了具体技术，develop new ways 改写了 dreaming up ways。

    创业动词骨架 以 starting new companies 的原样短语锁定 第5段 后，向后跳读至支撑政策主张的 historical explanation。以正确项为准，采用动词骨架比对：核对主体采取的 action 以及 labor 与 machines 之间的 relationship；与这一骨架冲突的选项可不逐句精译。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 taxes on low-wage labor wage subsidies

    What is expected to result from cutting taxes on low-wage labor and expanding wage subsidies?

    • A Lower incomes and weaker incentives to work.
    • B Higher incomes, stronger work incentives, more job creation, and less inequality.
    • C A larger gap between capital income and labor income.
    • D The elimination of the earned income tax credit.
    • E Less incentive for companies to create jobs.
    • F Equal earnings for all workers regardless of occupation.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：B

    第6段 在 This would 后依次写出 boost incomes、encourage work、reward companies for job creation、reduce inequality。正确项把这些并列效果转换为对应的名词短语，其中 more job creation 概括了对企业创造岗位的奖励与激励。障碍在于考生可能只记住 reduce inequality，而忽略政策具有收入、劳动供给和企业激励的复合目标。

    冒号后果四连 用 wage subsidies 这一专业术语直达 第6段，不要从 automation 的全文主题开始读。然后只盯住冒号后的 This would，进行四词串联：incomes、work、job creation、inequality。以正确项为准，能覆盖该结果串的综合项即保留；把问题原因、反向结果或绝对均等当结果的项迅速排除。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 indispensable help workers adapt

    What does the author consider indispensable in responding to automation?

    • A Destroying machines that threaten existing jobs.
    • B Preventing all workers from changing careers.
    • C Policies that help workers adapt to technological change.
    • D Ignoring the social benefits of technology.
    • E Guaranteeing that no career will be disrupted.
    • F Delaying technological progress until workers feel comfortable.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    第7段 的最后一句明确指出 policies to help workers adapt will be indispensable。正确项保留 policies、help workers adapt 三个核心关系，并以 technological change 概括 automation。障碍在于作者前句提到 technology will improve society，容易诱导考生选择推广技术类选项；但真正的结论聚焦受冲击者的适应支持。

    先辨否定再核主张 最有效的做法是用 indispensable 直接跳至 第7段 末句，并把前一句的强烈否定评价当作反向排除标记。以正确项为准，先删除把作者明确否定的行为包装为必要措施的选项，再核对剩余选项是否完整保留 policies、workers 与 adapt 的关系。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

7 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    中产阶级面临自动化威胁

    这个 opening paragraph 通过一个 rhetorical question 引出了 automation 对 middle-class jobs 的 threat,作为整篇 argumentative essay 的 hook,直接点出了 central concern,即 robots 会抢走 middle class 的工作这一 alarming issue。

    这个 introduction 建立了文章的 problem statement,为后续讨论 solutions 比如 education reform、entrepreneurship 和 tax policies 奠定了 foundation,让读者意识到这是一个需要 immediate attention 的 societal challenge。

    提出自动化威胁中产工作的核心问题
  2. 分论点 P2

    自动化威胁的严重性及其不均衡影响

    这个 supporting paragraph 用 Oxford study 的 statistical evidence 证明 automation risk 的 severity,特别强调了 middle class 会 disproportionately affected,而 lower-income jobs 和 the rich 相对 safe,建立了问题的 credibility 和 urgency。

    这个 evidence-based argument 让主旨中的 'significant threats to middle-class jobs' 变得 concrete 和 convincing,为后续提出的 solutions 提供了 solid justification,说明为什么需要 education reform 和 policy interventions。

    用数据论证中产阶级受自动化冲击最大
  3. 分论点 P3

    历史经验的启示与现实挑战

    这个 concession paragraph 通过 Industrial Revolution 的 historical analogy 承认 technological progress 最终会 benefit society,但用 'But' 转折强调 medium-term 的 adjustment challenges,体现了 balanced argumentation 的 sophistication。

    这个 nuanced analysis 为主旨中的 'mitigate these challenges' 提供了 rationale——既然 short-term pain 是 inevitable,就需要通过 education、entrepreneurship 和 tax policies 来 help workers adapt,让 solutions 显得更 necessary 和 reasonable。

    承认技术进步但强调过渡期需要帮助
  4. 分论点 P4

    第一个解决方案:教育与培训改革

    这个 solution-focused paragraph 提出了 first concrete measure,即 rethink education and job training,强调 curriculums 应该 focus on creativity 而非 memorizing facts,vocational schools 需要 foster problem-solving skills,online education 可以 make training affordable,直接呼应主旨中的 'education reform'。

    这个 detailed proposal 是主旨 'education reform focusing on creativity' 的 concrete manifestation,为 workers 提供了 adapt 到 automation era 的 practical pathway,是 mitigating challenges 的 first pillar。

    提出教育改革具体措施
  5. 分论点 P5

    第二个解决方案:激发商业活力与创业

    这个 entrepreneurship-focused paragraph 强调需要 revive business dynamism,make starting companies easier,让 entrepreneurs 能够 dream up ways 来 combine labor and machines,提到 3D printers 和 virtual reality 等 new technologies 的 best uses 还没被 invented,直接对应主旨的 'encouraging entrepreneurship to create new opportunities'。

    这个 forward-looking proposal 是主旨 'create new opportunities' 的 implementation strategy,通过 entrepreneurship 来 generate new jobs 和 business models,是 mitigating automation impact 的 second pillar,与 education reform 形成 complementary approaches。

    提出鼓励创业创造新机会
  6. 分论点 P6

    第三个解决方案:税收与社会保障重构

    这个 policy-oriented paragraph 提出 third solution,因为 automation threatens to widen the gap 在 capital income 和 labor income 之间,所以需要 rethink taxes 和 safety net,具体措施包括 cut taxes on low-wage labor 和 expand wage subsidies,直接对应主旨的 'restructuring tax policies to reduce inequality and support workers'。

    这个 redistributive proposal 是主旨 'reduce inequality and support workers' 的 concrete mechanism,通过 fiscal policy 来 address the income gap 加剧的问题,是 three-pronged strategy 的 final pillar,确保 automation benefits 能够 more equitably distributed。

    提出税收政策重构减少不平等
  7. 结论 P7

    总结展望与政策呼吁

    这个 concluding paragraph 先 acknowledge technology will improve society,然后用 'yet' 转折回到 those who will be upended,最后提出 balanced position——destroying machines 是 nuts,但 policies to help workers adapt 是 indispensable,完成了从 problem 到 solutions 再到 final call for action 的 complete argumentative arc。

    这个 conclusion 将主旨的所有 elements 串联起来——technology advancement 是 inevitable,challenges 是 real,但通过 comprehensive policies(education、entrepreneurship、taxes)可以 mitigate negative impacts。Final statement 'policies will be indispensable' 强化了整个 argument 的 urgency 和 practicality。

    总结全文并强调政策必要性
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2018年考研英语一真题 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他考研英语文章。

  1. 首段问题定位 P1

    议论文的 first paragraph 往往通过 rhetorical question 或 problematic scenario 来 establish the topic。这个 issue 就是作者要 address 的核心问题，后续所有 arguments 都围绕它展开。抓住 opening concern 就能快速 narrow down 文章的 focus area。

  2. 中段方案提取 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    在确定了 central issue 后，middle paragraphs 提供了 depth and substance。这些段落通过 statistical data（如 half of U.S. jobs）、expert opinions（如 Brynjolfsson and McAfee argue）、和 concrete suggestions（如 rethinking education, reviving business dynamism, rethinking taxes）来 support the main argument。这些 solution-oriented content 直接 reveal 作者的 stance 和文章的 ultimate purpose。

  3. 尾段立场确认 P7

    议论文的 conclusion 是 main thesis 的 crystal-clear restatement。它会 acknowledge both sides（如 Technology will improve society 但 little comfort to those upended）然后 emphasize the necessity of action（如 policies will be indispensable）。这种 balanced but decisive tone 直接 reveals 作者的 ultimate position：既不是 pure optimism 也不是 alarmism，而是 pragmatic policy advocacy。

  4. 三段式主旨合成 P1 P4 P5 P6 P7

    单独看某一部分容易 miss the full picture。Opening 告诉我们 what's at stake（middle-class jobs threatened），middle 告诉我们 how to respond（education, entrepreneurship, tax reform），conclusion 告诉我们 why it matters（can't destroy machines, must help workers adapt）。只有 combine 这三个 components，才能形成 complete and nuanced understanding of the thesis：这不是 simple prediction 也不是 one-sided solution，而是 multifaceted response to a complex challenge。

主旨信号词 challenges P1 should P4 disproportionately P2 but P3 indispensable P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

自动化对中产阶级工作构成重大威胁,但社会可以通过注重创造力的教育改革、鼓励创业以创造新机会、以及重组税收政策来减少不平等和支持工人度过技术转型期,从而缓解这些挑战。
Automation poses significant threats to middle-class jobs, but society can mitigate these challenges through education reform focusing on creativity, encouraging entrepreneurship to create new opportunities, and restructuring tax policies to reduce inequality and support workers during the technological transition.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进考研英语高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • alarmist 危言耸听的;散布恐慌的

    我们把三条线索串起来看：首先从 semantic contrast 发现 alarmist 和 optimist 对立，一个消极一个积极；然后从 morphology 确认 alarm（警报）+ -ist（者）的构成；最后从 discourse function 看到这个词是用来 tone down 过度的担忧。三条线索共同指向：alarmist 描述的是那种过度强调危险、散布恐慌的态度或人。

    对比+构词+语篇功能
  • Luddite 工业革命时期反对机器化的工人;抵制技术进步者

    三条线索形成了清晰的 interpretive chain：定语从句明确了 Luddites 是那些 jobs 被 mechanized looms displaced 的人；argument structure 显示他们是 technological upheaval 中的 victims，用来说明短期 negative impact；capitalization 表明这是一个 historical group 的专有名称。综合起来，Luddites 指的是工业革命时期因机器化而失业的工人群体，可能还对技术变革持抵制态度。

    语法线索+论证角色+文体标记
  • upheaval 剧变;动荡;大变革

    三条线索相互印证：collocation 和 analogy 将 upheaval 与 Industrial Revolution 这种 massive transformation 联系起来；morphological analysis 揭示了 heave（用力抛起）的 core meaning，暗示剧烈和突然；parallel expression 中的 drastic 直接确认了 intensity 的语义特征。综合判断，upheaval 指的是剧烈的、颠覆性的大变动。

    搭配+词根+平行表达
  • dynamism 活力;创新力;生机

    我们从三个角度 converge 到同一个结论：explanatory context 表明 dynamism 与 starting new companies 直接相关；morphological root dynam- 指向 energy 和 vitality；paragraph theme 强调 entrepreneurship 和 innovation。三者结合，business dynamism 指的是商业领域的活力和创新能力，特别是创办新企业和适应变化的能力。

    具象化+词根+主题
  • upend 颠覆;彻底打乱

    三条线索形成完整链条：semantic collocation 确认 upend 描述的是 automation 对 lives and careers 的 negative impact；morphological analysis 揭示了「翻转、颠倒」的 core image；thematic continuity 将其定位为对 displacement 和 disruption 的 强化表达。综合判断，upend 意思是「彻底颠覆、完全打乱」。

    搭配+意象+主题定位
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

9 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

  • 反问修辞

    P1

    作者在opening paragraph用了一个rhetorical question：'What happens when the robots come for their jobs?'这个反问directly engages读者，让他们immediately开始思考automation对middle-class jobs的威胁。这个question并不expect真正的answer，而是为了highlight一个被政治debate忽视的crucial issue，为全文的argument奠定基础。通过这种questioning的方式，作者successfully captures读者的attention，并且establishes文章要讨论的core problem。

    信号词 What happens when What if Have we considered Can we afford to ignore Is it possible that Who will How can we

    仿写： 当你want to引入一个controversial或者被忽视的topic时，可以consider用反问开篇。首先identify一个relevant yet overlooked的问题，然后用'What happens when...?'或者'Have we considered...?'这样的structure来present它。模版：'Among the [形容词] challenges facing [群体] is one that will probably go unmentioned in [语境]: [反问句]？'例如：'Among the pressing challenges facing young graduates is one that will probably go unmentioned in career seminars: What happens when traditional degrees lose their value?'

  • 引用论证

    P2

    作者在第二段cites了'a University of Oxford study'来support他的claim that'about half of U.S. jobs are at high risk of being automated'。这个citation provides authoritative evidence，让argument更加credible和persuasive。通过引用academic research，作者demonstrates这不是baseless speculation，而是有solid empirical foundation的concern。这种引用effectively strengthens了作者关于middle class面临disproportionate threat的论点。

    信号词 according to as stated by research shows studies indicate experts argue data reveals evidence suggests as noted in

    仿写： 当你need to support一个factual claim时，identify relevant research或者expert opinions。使用'according to [来源]'或者'[来源] argues/suggests/finds that'的structure来introduce引用。确保引用directly supports你的point并且comes from credible sources。模版：'[具体数据/观点], according to [权威来源], with [受影响群体] disproportionately [影响方式]。'例如：'Nearly 40% of retail jobs face elimination, according to a McKinsey report, with small-town workers disproportionately affected.'

  • 举例论证

    P2

    在第二段，作者provides concrete examples来illustrate哪些jobs面临automation risk：'Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care'作为relatively safe的examples，而'middle-class occupations – trucking, financial advice, software engineering'作为vulnerable的examples。这些specific instances让abstract concept of automation threat变得tangible and relatable。通过contrasting different job categories，作者effectively demonstrates为什么middle class is'disproportionately squeezed'，making the argument more persuasive and easier for读者to grasp。

    信号词 like such as for example for instance including namely specifically take consider

    仿写： 当presenting一个general claim时，immediately follow it with具体examples来illustrate。Select examples that读者can easily relate to并且clearly demonstrate你的point。Use'like'或者'such as'来introduce examples，或者用dashes来set off例子列表。模版：'[抽象观点] – [例子1], [例子2], [例子3] – [总结性评论]。'例如：'Many traditional skills are becoming obsolete – handwriting, map reading, mental arithmetic – raising questions about what education should prioritize.'

  • 对比论证

    P2

    第二段中作者creates a sharp contrast between不同income levels的job security：'Lower-income jobs...don't appeal to robots'versus'many middle-class occupations...have aroused their interest'，最后pointing out'The rich own the robots, so they will be fine'。这个三层对比vividly illustrates不平等的impact of automation across economic classes。通过juxtaposing these groups，作者emphasizes middle class的vulnerability并且highlights社会分层会因automation而deepen，strengthening他的argument about为什么这个issue deserves attention。

    信号词 but however while whereas in contrast on the other hand conversely unlike yet

    仿写： 当你want to highlight differences或者show unequal impacts时，explicitly contrast不同groups或者situations。Structure your sentences to present both sides，用'while,' 'whereas,' 'but'等词来signal contrast。确保contrast directly supports你的central argument。模版：'[群体A] [情况A]...[转折词] [群体B] [情况B]...The [群体C] [最终结果], so they will be [状态]。'例如：'Entry-level positions offer learning opportunities...But senior roles demand immediate expertise...The already-experienced thrive, so they will be increasingly sought after.'

  • 举例论证

    P3

    第三段作者uses the Industrial Revolution作为historical example来address potential concerns about automation。通过mentioning'Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms'但最终'it raised living standards and created more jobs'，作者demonstrates technological change has precedent for ultimately benefiting society。这个historical parallel helps作者present a balanced view，acknowledging short-term disruption while suggesting long-term benefits，thereby making他的argument about需要帮助workers adjust更加compelling and grounded in historical reality。

    信号词 likewise similarly just as historically in the past previously recall that remember when

    仿写： 当discussing contemporary challenges时，search for relevant historical parallels that可以provide perspective。Present the historical example clearly，explain what happened，然后draw explicit connections to current situation。Use cautious language like'likewise'或者'similarly'来suggest parallels without overstating them。模版：'[历史事件] didn't go so well for [受影响群体]...but it eventually [积极结果]. Likewise, [当前情况] should eventually [预期结果].'例如：'The printing press didn't go so well for scribes whose livelihoods vanished, but it eventually democratized knowledge. Likewise, AI should eventually expand access to expertise.'

  • 引用论证

    P4

    第四段作者cites'Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee'以及他们的著作'The Second Machine Age'来support教育改革的建议。通过referencing这些experts，作者的recommendations about'rethinking education and job training'获得了authoritative backing。这个citation表明教育reform不是作者的personal opinion，而是有expert consensus支持的solution，从而增强了argument的persuasiveness并且给读者confidence that这些建议are well-founded。

    信号词 argue in as argued by according to suggests proposes recommends advocates maintains contends

    仿写： 当proposing solutions或者recommendations时，identify relevant experts或者influential works in the field。Introduce them by name并且include their credentials或者著作title来establish authority。Use'argue'或者'suggest'来present their positions，然后elaborate on specific recommendations。模版：'As [专家名] and [专家名] argue in [著作名称], [主要观点] should be [行动]. [具体建议1]. [具体建议2].'例如：'As Carol Dweck argues in Mindset, assessment practices should be reformed. Tests should measure growth rather than fixed ability. Feedback should emphasize effort over innate talent.'

  • 排比修辞

    P6

    第六段作者uses parallel structure来present税收改革建议：'boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality'。这个series of parallel verb phrases creates rhythm并且emphasizes multiple benefits of proposed policy。通过listing these outcomes in quick succession with parallel grammar，作者makes the proposal appear comprehensive和well-thought-out，同时the rhythmic quality makes it memorable and persuasive。这个parallelism强化了tax reform的multi-faceted benefits，supporting文章的overall argument about需要policy interventions。

    信号词 and or not only...but also both...and either...or neither...nor

    仿写： 当presenting multiple related points或者benefits时，structure them using the same grammatical pattern。如果第一个item starts with a verb，所有items都should start with verbs。Maintain consistency in tense和form。Use commas to separate items并且'and'before the final item。模版：'This would [动词1] [宾语1], [动词2] [宾语2], [动词3] [宾语3], and [动词4] [宾语4].'例如：'This approach would enhance understanding, strengthen retention, develop critical thinking, and prepare students for complex challenges.'

  • 比喻修辞

    P7

    第七段作者uses metaphorical language：'machines that are coming for our jobs'将automation personified as主动追逐jobs的entities。这个'coming for'的表达通常associated with threat或者pursuit，creates a vivid image of machines as active agents。这个比喻makes abstract economic forces感觉更加immediate and tangible，helping读者viscerally understand the threat。It strengthens作者的call for action by making the challenge feel urgent and personal，而不是distant economic theory。

    信号词 coming for chasing threatening invading stealing disrupting transforming into

    仿写： 当discussing abstract threats或者forces时，consider using metaphorical language that personifies或者creates vivid imagery。Choose metaphors that align with the emotional tone你want to convey。Avoid混合metaphors或者overusing them。Keep them consistent with your overall message。模版：'[抽象概念] that are coming for [目标]'或者'[抽象概念] [动作动词] [对象].'例如：'Climate changes that are creeping into our daily lives'或者'Digital distractions that are stealing our attention spans.'

  • 因果论证

    P3 P4 P5 P6

    全文multiple instances展示因果关系，最明显的是第六段：'taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought'因为'automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income'。这个causal link明确establishes为什么tax reform是necessary：automation创造了inequality问题，因此需要policy responses。这种因果论证helps读者understand不仅what should be done，而且why it's necessary，making the argument more logical and persuasive。Similar causal reasoning出现在第四段linking education reform到better adaptation。

    信号词 because since as therefore thus consequently as a result so underlines the need for threatens to

    仿写： 当proposing solutions时，explicitly state the cause-effect relationship。First establish the problem or cause，then use causal connectors来introduce consequence或者necessary response。Make the logical link obvious so读者can follow your reasoning。模版：'Because [原因/问题], [结果/解决方案] will have to be [采取的行动].'或者'[问题] underlines the need for [解决方案].'例如：'Because remote work blurs professional boundaries, work-life balance policies will have to be reimagined.'

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

7 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 机器人威胁被政客刻意回避

    P1
    What happens when the robots come for their jobs? Don't dismiss that possibility entirely.

    委婉表达 will probably go unmentioned unlikely to be discussed tend to avoid rarely addressed conveniently overlooked swept under the rug prefer not to mention

    作者通过 'will probably go unmentioned' 这个 soft prediction,实际在 criticize political campaigns 对于 automation threat 的 deliberate avoidance,言外之意是这个 middle-class job crisis 非常 urgent and serious,但 politicians 出于 electoral considerations 选择 ignore it,这为全文的 argumentative tone 奠定了基础,也 justify 了作者为什么要在这篇文章里 elaborate 这个 overlooked problem,对 main thesis 的作用是 establish urgency 并指出 current political discourse 的 inadequacy

  • 中产阶级受冲击最严重

    P2
    Lower-income jobs like gardening or day care don't appeal to robots. But many middle-class occupations – trucking, financial advice, software engineering – have aroused their interest, or soon will. The rich own the robots, so they will be fine.

    对比类 disproportionately squeezed disproportionately while...the rich in contrast whereas unlike lower-income jobs however middle-class

    通过 'disproportionately squeezed' 和三个 class 的 fate comparison,作者的 implication 是 automation 不是 universal threat 而是 specifically targets middle class,言外之意包含两层:一是 middle-class 的 skills 和 jobs 恰好处在 automation sweet spot,既不像 low-skill labor 那样 hard to automate,也不像 capital owners 那样 benefit from automation;二是这种 disproportionate impact 会 exacerbate social inequality,这为后文提出的 policy solutions 提供了 justification,也 reinforce 了 main thesis 中关于需要 mitigate challenges 的 urgency

  • 历史类比不能完全照搬

    P3
    Optimists point out that technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past. The Industrial Revolution didn't go so well for Luddites whose jobs were displaced by mechanized looms, but it eventually raised living standards and created more jobs than it destroyed. Likewise, automation should eventually boost productivity, stimulate demand by driving down prices, and free workers from hard, boring work. But in the medium term, middle-class workers may need a lot of help adjusting.

    让步转折类 But in the medium term However, in the short run Yet for now Nonetheless, currently Still, in the meantime Even so, temporarily Although eventually..., presently

    通过 'But in the medium term' 这个 temporal qualifier,作者承认 historical optimism 的同时,强调 transition period 的 pain 不能被 long-term benefits 所 justify 或 dismiss,言外之意是 wait-and-see attitude 是 irresponsible 的,因为 medium-term suffering 是 real and urgent,这个 implied message 直接支持 main thesis 中的 'mitigate challenges' 和后续段落提出的 proactive policies,也 counter 了潜在的 laissez-faire argument,作者实际在说 'eventual benefits' 不是 excuse for inaction

  • 传统教育体系已过时

    P4
    Curriculums – from grammar school to college – should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity and complex communication.

    对比词 should evolve to focus less on...and more on shift from...to move away from...toward replace...with rather than...should instead of...need to not so much...as

    通过 'should evolve to focus less on memorizing facts and more on creativity',作者 implicitly criticize 了 current education system 的 rote-learning approach 已经 obsolete in automation era,言外之意是传统的 fact-based curriculum 不仅 insufficient 而且 potentially harmful,因为它 prepares students for exactly the kind of jobs robots can do better,这个 implied critique 支持了 main thesis 中的 'education reform' component,也解释了为什么 workers need help adjusting - 因为 existing system failed to prepare them,对 argumentative structure 的作用是 establish causality between past failures 和 current crisis

  • 创新机制已经失灵

    P5
    The challenge of coping with automation underlines the need for the U.S. to revive its fading business dynamism: Starting new companies must be made easier.

    情态词 must be made easier has to be simplified needs to become more accessible should be facilitated requires removal of barriers ought to be streamlined demands reform to enable

    通过 'Starting new companies must be made easier' 配合 'fading business dynamism',作者 imply 当前的 regulatory environment 或 institutional framework 已经变成 entrepreneurship 的 obstacle 而不是 enabler,言外之意是 U.S. 的 innovation ecosystem 正在 decline 不是因为 lack of ideas 而是因为 systemic dysfunction,这个 critique 支持 main thesis 中 'encouraging entrepreneurship' 的 component,也暗示需要 fundamental reform 而非 incremental fixes,对 overall argument 的作用是 connect automation challenge 到 broader institutional failure

  • 市场机制无法自行纠正不平等

    P6
    Finally, because automation threatens to widen the gap between capital income and labor income, taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought.

    情态词 will have to be rethought must be fundamentally reconsidered requires complete overhaul demands radical restructuring needs thorough reexamination calls for wholesale reform necessitates rethinking from scratch

    通过 'taxes and the safety net will have to be rethought',作者 imply current tax and welfare system 是基于 labor-capital balance 的 outdated assumption,在 automation era 这个 framework 已经 structurally unable 去 address widening inequality,言外之意是 laissez-faire approach 或 minor policy tweaks 都 inadequate,need fundamental redistribution mechanism,这支持 main thesis 中的 'restructuring tax policies' component,也是全文 argument 的 culmination - 从 education 到 entrepreneurship 到 taxation,形成 comprehensive policy package,对 rhetorical strategy 的作用是 establish highest level of intervention necessity

  • 仅靠技术进步无法解决社会问题

    P7
    Technology will improve society in ways big and small over the next few years, yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives and careers upended by automation.

    转折类 yet this will be little comfort to but this offers cold comfort for however, this means little to still, this provides scant solace to nonetheless, this hardly helps even so, this does nothing for

    通过 'yet this will be little comfort to those who find their lives upended',作者 imply technological progress 的 narrative 常常 ignore human cost,总体的 societal improvement 不能 justify individual suffering,言外之意是需要 policy intervention 而非 simply trust market or technology 会 automatically solve problems,这是全文 argument 的 final justification - 为什么 despite inevitable progress,we still need proactive policies,对 rhetorical closure 的作用是 remind readers of moral imperative 而非只是 economic efficiency,强化 'help workers adapt will be indispensable' 的 conclusion

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度：积极支持

结论先行：本文作者态度为积极支持（ cautiously optimistic with policy recommendations）。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇用词分寸感 P1

    在 argumentative essays 议论文中，opening tone 开篇基调往往 reveal 揭示作者的 starting position 起始立场。这里用 annoying 而不是 catastrophic 灾难性的，表明作者认为这是一个 significant but manageable 重要但可控的 issue 问题，而非 apocalyptic threat 末日威胁。

  2. 让步段落的真诚度 P3

    在 argumentative structure 论证结构中，作者主动 acknowledge counterarguments 承认反方观点并给予 fair treatment 公正对待，这显示出 intellectual honesty 知识诚实和 balanced thinking 平衡思考。特别是用 eventually raised living standards 最终提高生活水平这样的 positive outcome 积极结果，说明作者并非 purely pessimistic 纯粹悲观。

  3. 解决方案段落占比 P4 P5 P6

    在 argumentative writing 议论性写作中，大量 prescriptive language 规定性语言（should, must, need to）配合 detailed solutions 详细解决方案，表明作者相信 problem is solvable 问题可解决，这是 constructive optimism 建设性乐观的 hallmark 标志。如果作者是 pessimistic 悲观的，通常只会 describe problems 描述问题而不提 actionable solutions 可行方案。

  4. 限定词修饰对象 P3 P4 P7

    Hedging 模糊限定是 academic writing 学术写作的 characteristic 特征，显示作者在 maintaining intellectual caution 保持知识谨慎的同时 advancing arguments 推进论点。这种 nuanced approach 细致入微方法区别于 dogmatic 教条的 negative 或 positive stance 立场，说明态度是 cautiously optimistic 谨慎乐观而非 naively enthusiastic 天真热情。

  5. 结论的判断方向 P7

    Conclusion 结论是 argumentative essay 议论文中 author's final verdict 作者最终判断的 crystallization 结晶。这里用 will improve 将改善这个 future affirmative 未来肯定式，配合 rejecting radical solutions 拒绝激进方案（destroying machines 很 nuts 疯狂）和 endorsing adaptive policies 支持适应性政策，清晰表明作者的 ultimate position 最终立场是 optimistic with caveats 带警示的乐观。

  6. 多层证据指向一致 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    将所有 textual evidence 文本证据整合后，可以看到作者使用的是 classic problem-solution argumentative pattern 经典问题-解决方案论证模式，其中 solution component 解决方案部分明显 outweighs 超过 problem component 问题部分。这种 structural imbalance 结构不平衡是 intentional 有意的，反映作者相信 through proper policies 通过适当政策可以 navigate the transition 驾驭转型，这是 qualified optimism 有条件乐观的 definitive marker 明确标记。

文中的态度信号词

  • This isn't to be alarmist P3

    这个 explicit disclaimer 明确声明直接告诉读者作者的 stance 立场不是 alarmist 危言耸听的，相当于作者在 self-positioning 自我定位，主动 distance himself 与悲观主义拉开距离，为后面的 optimistic arguments 乐观论点铺路。

    同类词 not to sound pessimistic without being alarmist to be clear not to exaggerate in fairness

  • should P4

    Modal verb 情态动词 should 表达 obligation or recommendation 义务或建议，在 第4段、第5段、第6段 中反复出现，显示作者在 prescribing solutions 开具解决方案。这种 prescriptive tone 规定性语气说明作者相信 action can be taken 可以采取行动，这是 optimistic agency 乐观能动性的体现。

    同类词 must need to ought to it is essential that it is imperative that

  • eventually P3

    Temporal adverb 时间副词 eventually 修饰 positive outcomes 积极结果（raised living standards, boost productivity），表明作者承认 short-term challenges 短期挑战但相信 long-term benefits 长期利益。这种 temporal framing 时间框架是 optimism 乐观主义的 classic strategy 经典策略：承认当前痛苦但展望未来改善。

    同类词 in the long run ultimately over time in due course with time

  • Optimists point out P3

    这个 attribution phrase 归因短语引入了 optimistic perspective 乐观视角，而且作者用 neutral reporting verb 中立报道动词 point out 而非 dismissive verbs 轻蔑动词（claim, allege），说明作者 giving credence to 认可这个 optimistic view 乐观观点。

    同类词 proponents argue supporters believe advocates claim some experts suggest many researchers find

  • will improve P7

    Future tense 将来时 with positive verb 积极动词 will improve 是作者在 conclusion 结论中的 definitive prediction 明确预测，这是 strongest positive signal 最强积极信号之一。不同于 hedged predictions 有限定的预测（might improve），这个 categorical future 断然未来式表达 confident optimism 自信乐观。

    同类词 will benefit will enhance will lead to is going to are bound to

  • nuts P7

    Informal negative evaluative term 非正式负面评价词 nuts 用来 reject 拒绝 Luddite solution 勒德主义解决方案（destroying machines 摧毁机器），这种 strong dismissal 强烈否定说明作者坚定支持 embracing technology 拥抱科技而非 resisting it 抵制它，进一步 reinforce 强化 optimistic stance 乐观立场。

    同类词 absurd ridiculous foolish misguided short-sighted

  • indispensable P7

    Strong necessity term 强必要性词汇 indispensable 用来修饰 policies to help workers adapt 帮助工人适应的政策，表明作者不仅 propose solutions 提出解决方案，而且认为这些方案是 absolutely required 绝对必需的。这种 emphatic endorsement 强调性支持显示 deep commitment 深度承诺 to actionable optimism 可行动的乐观主义。

    同类词 essential crucial vital critical necessary

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例，可直接迁移到其他考研英语 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文？

  1. 开篇提出争议性问题 P1

    第1段直接抛出了一个provocative question:'What happens when the robots come for their jobs?'这是一个forward-looking、充满debate potential的问题。说明文会neutral地introduce a topic,新闻报道会lead with factual events,但议论文会immediately establish一个需要argue或discuss的stance。

  2. 呈现并回应反方观点 P3

    第3段明确展示了optimists的view:'technological upheaval has benefited workers in the past',然后用'But'进行转折。这种present opposing view然后qualify or challenge it的pattern,是argumentation的core characteristic。说明文只会objectively present information,新闻会quote different sources但不会personally argue。

  3. 提出明确行动建议 P4 P5 P6

    第4段到第6段连续给出了prescriptive solutions:'should be rethinking'、'must be made easier'、'need to be cut'。这些imperative statements表明作者不仅在analyze问题,更在advocate for specific actions。说明文会maintain neutral tone,新闻报道可能quote others' recommendations但记者本人不会directly prescribe。

  4. 结尾明确价值判断 P7

    第7段用'would be nuts'这种strong evaluative expression来reject一种option,然后用'will be indispensable'来affirm另一种approach。这种definitive、value-laden conclusion是argumentation的hallmark。说明文会summarize information without taking sides,新闻会end with factual closure而非personal judgment。

  5. 四维度综合判定 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    本文完美展示了all four markers:controversial opening question about automation's impact,optimists vs. cautious view的dialectical structure,连续三段detailed policy recommendations,以及value-laden conclusion。四个dimensions互相reinforce,形成了tight argumentative framework。说明文可能有一两个features但不会have this complete persuasive architecture,新闻报道则会maintain journalistic objectivity throughout。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁？

  • annoying challenges P1 观点引导词 face the problem critical issue pressing concern troubling trend worrying development
  • Don't dismiss P2 立场表态词 Don't overlook Don't underestimate We must recognize It's crucial to understand We should acknowledge
  • This isn't to be alarmist P3 立场表态词 I'm not suggesting This is not to say Let me be clear To be fair Admittedly
  • should be P4 观点引导词 must be ought to need to have to it's necessary to
  • But P3 论证逻辑连接词 but however yet nevertheless nonetheless
  • underlines the need for P5 观点引导词 highlights the importance of demonstrates the necessity of makes clear that shows why we must reveals the urgency of
  • would be nuts P7 立场表态词 would be foolish would be disastrous makes no sense is absurd is misguided
  • will be indispensable P7 立场表态词 is indispensable is essential is crucial is vital is imperative
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

12 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 的常见问题

2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章 的原文出自哪里？
Bloomberg2015年5月12日社论文章:Robots Versus the Middle Class(机器人 VS中产阶级)。
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章的主旨是什么？
自动化对中产阶级工作构成重大威胁,但社会可以通过注重创造力的教育改革、鼓励创业以创造新机会、以及重组税收政策来减少不平等和支持工人度过技术转型期,从而缓解这些挑战。（英文表述：Automation poses significant threats to middle-class jobs, but society can mitigate these challenges through education reform focusing on creativity, encouraging entrepreneurship to create new opportunities, and restructuring tax policies to reduce inequality and support workers during the technological transition.）
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章是什么体裁？难度如何？
体裁为议论文，作者立场是积极支持（cautiously optimistic with policy recommendations）。CEFR 难度 C1，全文 449 词、7 段；在考研英语一全部 102 篇真题文章中，C1 级共 92 篇（占 90%）。
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的？
全文 7 段按议论文骨架分为 7 个意群：引言 · 第1段——中产阶级面临自动化威胁；分论点 · 第2段——自动化威胁的严重性及其不均衡影响；分论点 · 第3段——历史经验的启示与现实挑战；分论点 · 第4段——第一个解决方案:教育与培训改革；分论点 · 第5段——第二个解决方案:激发商业活力与创业；分论点 · 第6段——第三个解决方案:税收与社会保障重构；结论 · 第7段——总结展望与政策呼吁。
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章的作者态度是什么？
作者态度是积极支持（cautiously optimistic with policy recommendations）。判断路径：开篇用词分寸感 → 让步段落的真诚度 → 解决方案段落占比 → 限定词修饰对象 → 结论的判断方向 → 多层证据指向一致；文中的态度信号词包括 This isn't to be alarmist（第3段）、should（第4段）、eventually（第3段）、Optimists point out（第3段）、will improve（第7段）、nuts（第7段）、indispensable（第7段）。
2018年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (1) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词？
按文中出现顺序共 5 个：alarmist（危言耸听的;散布恐慌的）、Luddite（工业革命时期反对机器化的工人;抵制技术进步者）、upheaval（剧变;动荡;大变革）、dynamism（活力;创新力;生机）、upend（颠覆;彻底打乱），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新：