懒笔记
2021年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (3) Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny
Postgraduate · 来自 2021年考研英语二真题 · Section II Part A (3) · 阅读理解（四选一）

Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny

2021年考研英语二真题文章逐层精读

Financial Times《金融时报》2020年2月13日文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny(大型科技公司的“买了即杀”策略受到政府审查)。

本页是 2021年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (3) 文章的精读视角页——这篇新闻报道全文 401 词、7 段，CEFR 难度 C1（C1 级在考研英语二文章中占 77%），作者立场为「消极批判」；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他考研英语真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

7 段英文原文

以下为2021年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (3) 的阅读理解（四选一）原文，共 7 段。左侧 P1–P7 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny

When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015, it picked two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft's own Office dominates the market for "productivity" software, but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world.

Both apps, however, were later scrapped, after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many "acqui-hires" that the biggest companies have used to feed their great hunger for tech talent.

To Microsoft's critics, the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path. "They bought the seedlings and closed them down," complained Paul Arnold, a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures, putting an end to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoft declined to comment.

Like other start-up investors, Mr. Arnold's own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result: "I think these things are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? I don't know."

The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. This week, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.

Given their combined market value of more than $5.5 trillion, rifling through such small deals—many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise—might seem beside the point. Between them, the five biggest tech companies have spent an average of only $3.4 billion a year on sub-$1 billion acquisitions over the past five years—a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than $130 billion of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.

However, critics say the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a "buy and kill" tactic to simply close them down.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

7 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2021年考研英语二真题 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读，并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Microsoft's Strategic Acquisitions of Rising Startups

    Microsoft acquired two buzzy smartphone-native startups, Wunderlist and Sunrise, despite dominating the productivity software market with Office.

    这个 opening paragraph 为整篇 article 关于 Big Tech acquisition strategy 的 investigation 提供了 concrete case。它巧妙地 establish 了一个 paradox：market leader 为什么要 acquire small players？这个 setup 为后续段落揭示 "buy and kill" strategy 埋下了 foreshadowing。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 提供了 specific evidence，让抽象的 antitrust concerns 变得 tangible and relatable。

    识别主体行动和市场对比
  2. P2

    From Acquisition to Shutdown: The Fate of Wunderlist and Sunrise

    Microsoft shut down both acquired apps after absorbing their features and engineers, exemplifying the "acqui-hire" practice common among tech giants.

    这个 paragraph 是文章 argument 的 crucial turning point。它把第一段中看似 positive 的 acquisition narrative 翻转成一个 problematic outcome。Scrapped 这个词的 emotional weight 为后续 critics 的 harsh language（"chew up", "buy and kill"）做好了 emotional preparation。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 提供了 FTC investigation 的 direct evidence：acquisitions 确实导致了 products 的 elimination，这正是 antitrust concerns 的核心所在。

    追踪事件结果并识别行业模式
  3. P3

    Critics Condemn Big Tech's "Buy and Kill" Strategy

    Critics accuse Big Tech of deliberately acquiring and shutting down innovative startups to eliminate future competitors, citing Microsoft's actions as an example.

    这个 paragraph 是文章 argumentative structure 的 pivot point。它明确地将前面的 case study 转化为一个 broader accusation against Big Tech。通过引入 critics' voice，文章从 reporting facts 转向 presenting controversy。这为第五段 FTC investigation 的出场提供了 perfect justification：既然有 serious accusations，regulatory scrutiny 就显得 necessary and timely。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph explicitly articulates 了 "buy and kill" strategy，这正是 FTC 想要 investigate 的核心 concern。

    捕捉评价性语言和直接引语
  4. P4

    The Investor's Dilemma: Profit vs. Economic Health

    A venture capitalist admits to conflicted feelings about Big Tech acquisitions, acknowledging they benefit his business while questioning their impact on the broader economy.

    这个 paragraph 为文章增加了 crucial nuance。在第三段的 harsh criticism 之后，它展示了 issue 的 complexity：即使是 critics，也是这个 system 的 participants 和 beneficiaries。这种 self-aware ambivalence 让文章更 credible，避免了 one-sided polemic。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 暗示 FTC investigation 面对的不是 simple villain，而是一个 complex ecosystem with built-in incentive structures。这为理解 regulatory challenge 提供了 important context。

    识别双重立场和内在矛盾
  5. P5

    FTC Launches Investigation into Big Tech's Acquisition Practices

    The FTC is investigating small acquisitions by the five biggest tech companies, potentially extending regulatory oversight into early-stage tech markets for the first time.

    这个 paragraph 是整篇 article 的 structural center。它揭示了文章的 true news angle：不只是 reporting 一个 long-standing practice，而是 announcing regulatory scrutiny。前面四段的 buildup（case study, consequences, criticism, complexity）都为这个 moment 做准备。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 明确回答了 implicit question：既然存在 "buy and kill" concerns，谁来 address 它们？答案是 FTC。这为后续段落 assess the significance 和 scale of the issue 提供了 framework。

    识别官方行动和政策转向
  6. P6

    The Paradox of Scale: Why Target Small Deals?

    Despite the enormous market value of Big Tech, their small acquisitions represent a tiny fraction of their resources and venture capital investment, seemingly making them an odd regulatory target.

    这个 paragraph 采用了 strategic concession 的 technique：先 acknowledge 一个看似 reasonable objection（这些 deals 太小不值得关注），然后为 next paragraph 的 rebuttal 创造 dramatic effect。从 article structure 来看，这是一个 classic two-punch combination：第六段说 "看起来不重要"，第七段说 "但实际上很关键"。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 提醒 reader，antitrust concerns 不能仅用 dollar amounts 来衡量，strategic impact 才是关键，这为 FTC investigation 的 rationale 提供了 deeper justification。

    量化对比揭示表面矛盾
  7. P7

    The "Buy and Kill" Tactic: Eliminating Threats Early

    Critics argue that big tech companies strategically acquire threatening startups before they gain traction, sometimes deliberately shutting them down through a "buy and kill" tactic.

    这个 concluding paragraph 完成了文章的 argumentative arc。它 resolves 第六段提出的 paradox：虽然 financial scale 很小，但 strategic impact 巨大，因为这些 acquisitions prevent future competition。"Buy and kill" 这个 term 为整篇 article 提供了 memorable takeaway。从 article theme 来看，这个 paragraph 最终 justify 了 FTC investigation：如果 Big Tech 确实在 systematically eliminating potential competitors，那么 regulatory scrutiny 不仅 justified，而且 urgent。这个 ending 让 reader 理解为什么看似 minor 的 acquisitions 可能对 innovation 和 competition 产生 major consequences。

    整合证据并明确核心指控
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

7 道逐段细节自检题

针对2021年考研英语二真题这篇原文，每段配 1 道细节题（ 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ，由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制，非试卷原题）。 选项默认中性；点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法，现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 Wunderlist and Sunrise smartphone

    What made Wunderlist and Sunrise attractive acquisition targets for Microsoft?

    • A They had already overtaken Office in the productivity software market.
    • B They were the largest and most established software companies in Silicon Valley.
    • C They represented a smartphone-oriented new wave of technology and had attracted considerable attention.
    • D They promised to reduce Microsoft's spending on mobile technology.
    • E They were designed mainly for traditional desktop users.
    • F They were bought because their engineers had developed Office.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    该项把原文的 attracting considerable buzz 与 designed from the ground up for the smartphone world 做了忠实概括。它没有把 buzz 夸大成 market leadership，也没有把 new wave 偷换为已取代 Office。障碍在于题干问 attractive 的原因，考生需要整合两个分散修饰信息，而不能只摘取其中一个短语。

    双专名后读转折 时间紧张时，跳过全文顺读，直接用题干中的 Wunderlist and Sunrise 进行双专名扫描，立刻锁定 第1段。然后只执行“转折后半句优先”这一规则：题干的 attractive acquisition targets 要求解释收购价值，故以 but 后的 technology 描述为主，再用正确项核验是否同时保留 attention 信息。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 Wunderlist, Sunrise engineering teams

    What happened to Wunderlist, Sunrise, and their engineering teams?

    • A Both apps continued operating independently under their original brands.
    • B Their engineering teams left Microsoft to form new start-ups.
    • C Microsoft sold the apps to another major technology company.
    • D The apps were scrapped, but their engineers remained with Microsoft as acqui-hires.
    • E Microsoft kept the apps unchanged while replacing their engineers.
    • F The apps' best features were removed from Microsoft's products.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    该项完整保留了 were later scrapped、teams of engineers stayed on 和 acqui-hires 三个事实节点。but 准确呈现产品消失与人才留下的反差。障碍在于题干列出多个对象，考生需要分别读取产品和团队信息，不能把其中一方的结果套用到另一方。

    对象动作分栏核验 直接用两个产品专名扫描并锁定 第2段，不从 Microsoft 的所有出现处开始读。随后使用“对象与动作分栏”法：在草稿上把题干列举的对象分别放入不同栏位，正确项必须使每个对象的动作都与原文相符。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 Microsoft's critics potential competitors

    According to Microsoft's critics, why are acquisitions such as those of Wunderlist and Sunrise troubling?

    • A They make innovative companies more capable of competing with Big Tech.
    • B They force Microsoft to disclose confidential product features.
    • C They prevent start-up investors from selling businesses to larger companies.
    • D They are too expensive for Microsoft to sustain over time.
    • E They can eliminate innovative businesses that might otherwise become future competitors.
    • F They result from regulators' refusal to oversee technology markets.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：E

    该项准确概括了 bought the seedlings and closed them down，以及 businesses that might one day turn into competitors。can 和 might 保留了原文的潜在性，没有把批评者的推断说成确定结果。障碍在于 seedlings 是比喻，考生必须还原为 early innovative businesses，并理解关闭行为与竞争威胁之间的关系。

    观点归因三格压缩 先以 critics 为唯一入口锁定 第3段，随后不必精读全部描写，只抽取引语及其后的解释性结构。用“谁在评价、评价什么、依据何在”三格压缩该观点，正确项应完整匹配三格。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Mr. Arnold American economy

    How does Mr. Arnold view the sale of start-ups to larger technology companies?

    • A He fully supports the sales because they always strengthen the American economy.
    • B He opposes the sales because his investment business cannot profit from them.
    • C He believes regulators should ban all acquisitions by large companies.
    • D He regards the sales as irrelevant to both investors and the wider economy.
    • E He is certain that start-ups should remain independent.
    • F He sees such sales as beneficial to him personally but is uncertain about their effect on the American economy.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：F

    该项对应 good for me、if I put my selfish hat on 与 Are they good for the American economy? I don't know。but 复现了原文的态度张力，uncertain 也准确保留了 I don't know 的不确定程度。障碍在于考生易把投资者的经济利益误选为其完整观点，忽略 though 和后半句。

    转折两半对偶核验 以 Mr. Arnold 定位 第4段 后，直接圈出 though 和 but 等转折标记，不必逐词翻译整段。将转折前后压缩成两个匿名判断，选择同时保留两部分且语气强度准确的正确项。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 US Federal Trade Commission small acquisitions

    What action has the US Federal Trade Commission taken concerning major technology companies' small acquisitions?

    • A It requested information from the five most valuable US tech companies about their small acquisitions over the past decade.
    • B It prohibited the five companies from making any further small acquisitions.
    • C It fined the companies for acquisitions completed during the past decade.
    • D It ordered Microsoft to restore Wunderlist and Sunrise.
    • E It asked venture capital firms to report all of their investments.
    • F It launched a formal antitrust case against every large technology company.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：A

    该项逐一保留 asked for information、five most valuable US tech companies、many small acquisitions 和 over the past decade。requested 的法律力度与原文一致，没有升级成 lawsuit、penalty 或 ban。障碍在于题干中的 action 容易诱导考生选择听起来更强硬的监管措施。

    监管动词力度尺 用完整机构名直达 第5段，然后只做“动词力度对齐”：先记录原文实际 action verb，再将各选项按 information-gathering、formal proceeding 和 sanction 等层级归类。只有动作层级、对象、数量与时间范围均一致的正确项才能保留。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 financial reserves venture capital

    Why might the scrutiny of relatively small acquisitions seem insignificant at first?

    • A The five companies have no financial reserves available for acquisitions.
    • B Their cost is small compared with the companies' vast financial resources and the scale of venture capital investment.
    • C Venture capital investment in the US has fallen below one billion dollars.
    • D The acquisitions are all valued at more than one billion dollars each.
    • E The companies have stopped investing in small technology deals.
    • F Regulators have declared that small acquisitions cannot affect competition.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：B

    该项是 a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves and the more than $130 billion of venture capital 的等义概括。cost 由 spent on acquisitions 支持，small compared with 保留了相对而非绝对的判断。障碍在于多个金额同时出现，考生容易误把 $3.4 billion 当作“大额支出”而忽略比较基准。

    匿名量级关系核验 直接抓题干中的 relatively、seem 和 insignificant，锁定 第6段 的比较密集区。无需计算具体金额，只把各数值匿名化为 A、B、C，并标出它们的 category 与 comparison direction；正确项必须与原文的关系和语气同时一致。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 buy and kill critics

    What do critics mean by a "buy and kill" tactic?

    • A It means buying struggling firms in order to revive and expand them.
    • B It refers to selling acquired companies when they become profitable.
    • C It involves acquiring threatening potential competitors and then simply shutting their businesses down.
    • D It is a strategy of hiring engineers without acquiring their companies.
    • E It means merging two large competitors to create a stronger business.
    • F It describes regulators' decision to stop technology acquisitions.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    该项将 buy 对应 acquiring threatening potential competitors，将 kill 对应 simply close them down，且保留了 potential 的限定。它是对原文定义句的同义改写。障碍在于 kill 并非字面伤害，而是商业语境中的 business closure；此外，threatening 修饰的是 potential competitors，不是已经成熟的 rivals。

    术语四槽回查 题干含有带引号的 buy and kill，直接原样扫描并锁定 第7段。采用“术语结构回查”法：只标记术语附近的 actor、object、purpose 和 result 四个槽位，不先填入选项内容；正确项必须使四个槽位均获得原文支持。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

7 个意群的新闻报道骨架

按新闻报道 的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. P1

    引出事件背景

    这个 opening paragraph 通过 Microsoft 在2015年 acquired 两个 buzzing start-ups 的 concrete case 来 establish 新闻的 context，强调这些 newcomers 代表了 smartphone era 的 new wave technology，为后续 controversy 埋下 foreshadowing

    作为 news lead 的 opening，这个意群通过 introducing 一个 specific acquisition case 来 draw readers in，同时 hint 出 Big Tech companies 正在 absorbing innovative start-ups 的 pattern，为揭示 FTC investigation 的 underlying concerns 做 contextual preparation

    提供调查对象的典型案例
  2. P2

    揭示收购结局

    这个 paragraph 通过 revealing 两个 apps 最终 were scrapped 的 outcome，产生 dramatic turn，同时 introduce 了 acqui-hire 这个 key concept，说明 Big Tech 通过 acquisitions 来 feed their hunger for talent 的 underlying motive

    这个意群 deliver 了 crucial plot twist，从 promising acquisitions 到 being shut down 的 stark contrast 直接 expose 出 potential problem，为 critics 后续 attack Big Tech 的 anti-competitive behavior 提供 factual ammunition，是 news story 从 background 转向 controversy 的 pivotal transition

    揭露收购后关闭产品的做法
  3. P3

    引入批评声音

    这个 paragraph 通过 introducing critics' perspective 和 specific voice (Paul Arnold)，将 factual events 升级为 controversial issue，用 strong language 如 remorseless drive 和 chew up 来 characterize Big Tech 的 behavior 为 deliberately eliminating potential competitors

    这个意群 pivot 了 news narrative 从 objective reporting 到 interpretive controversy，通过 presenting critical viewpoint 来 frame 这些 acquisitions 为 anti-competitive practice。Critics 的 voice 直接 articulate 了 underlying concern，为 FTC investigation 的 rationale 提供 contextual justification

    呈现批评者的反垄断指控
  4. P4

    呈现立场矛盾

    这个 paragraph 继续 featuring Paul Arnold 但 reveal 了他的 conflicted position：作为 investor 他 benefits from 这些 acquisitions，但同时 question 其对 American economy 的 impact。这种 ambivalence 增加了 issue 的 complexity 和 nuance

    这个意群通过 showcasing internal contradiction within critic's camp 来 add depth to the debate，避免 oversimplified narrative。它 demonstrate 即使 critics 也 acknowledge 这些 practices 的 personal benefits，这种 honest ambivalence 增强了 story 的 credibility 并 foreshadow 后续 regulatory intervention 的 necessity

    展示利益相关者的两难处境
  5. P5

    引出监管行动

    这个 paragraph 标志 major narrative shift，introduce FTC 作为 new protagonist 并 reveal 其 investigation initiative。通过 this week 和 asking for information 等 time-sensitive details，establish 这是 breaking news 的 immediacy，同时 indicate regulatory intervention 可能 wade into previously unregulated territory

    这是整篇 news 的 真正 lead - the actual news peg。前面的 paragraphs 都是 build-up，这个意群 finally reveal 促使 this story 成为 newsworthy 的 trigger event：FTC 的 investigation。它 connect 之前的 background controversy 到 concrete regulatory action，是 entire narrative 的 structural anchor

    宣布监管机构启动调查
  6. P6

    质疑调查意义

    这个 paragraph 通过 presenting contrasting perspective 来 question FTC investigation 的 significance。用 quantitative evidence ($5.5 trillion market value vs. $3.4 billion acquisitions) 来 argue 这些 small deals 相对于 Big Tech 的 massive scale 是 beside the point，形成对 regulatory action 的 skeptical counterargument

    这个意群 introduce opposing viewpoint 来 balance the narrative，通过 concrete financial data 来 challenge 关注这些 small acquisitions 的 rationale。这种 presenting counterargument 是 balanced journalism 的 requirement，同时为 final paragraph 反驳这个 skepticism 创造 dialectical structure

    用数据质疑小额收购的重要性
  7. P7

    回归批评核心

    这个 closing paragraph 通过 However 实现 decisive turn，reassert critics' position 并 introduce buy and kill 这个 powerful term。它 counter 了 previous skepticism，强调 Big Tech 通过这些 seemingly small deals 来 eliminate threatening competitors before they gain momentum，为 FTC investigation 提供 ultimate justification

    作为 conclusion，这个意群 bring narrative full circle，从 opening examples 到 regulatory response 再到 final reaffirmation of underlying concern。buy and kill tactic 这个 memorable phrase 提供 conceptual closure，validate FTC investigation 的 rationale 并 leave readers with 关于 anti-competitive practices 的 clear takeaway

    揭示扼杀竞争的战术动机
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2021年考研英语二真题 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他考研英语文章。

  1. 首段案例非主旨 P1

    News reports 通常在 opening paragraphs 铺设 context，但 main thesis 往往在中后段 emerge。第一段的 acquisition details 只是为后续 controversy 做铺垫，不能被误判为 central theme。

  2. 监管机构行动 P5

    Government agencies 或 regulatory bodies 在 news reports 中的 appearance 往往标志着从 background narrative 转向 core controversy。FTC 的 investigation action 是文章要报道的 central event，而非前面的 historical examples。

  3. 批评者指控模式 P3 P4 P7

    News reports 中 multiple paragraphs 重复出现 critical voices 说明这不是 isolated complaint，而是文章要 investigate 的 central allegation。Critics 的 accusations 构成了 FTC investigation 的 rationale，两者互为支撑。

  4. 行动+争议+证据 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    News reports 的 thesis 是 newsworthy event（FTC probe）+ the issue being probed（potential anti-competitive acquisitions）。前面段落的 specific cases 和 critics' voices 都是 supporting this central narrative 的 evidential layers。

主旨信号词 find the answer P5 critics P3 buy and kill P7 acquisitions P5 potential competitors P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

美国联邦贸易委员会正在调查大型科技公司是否通过收购有前途的初创企业来消除潜在竞争对手。批评者以微软收购 Wunderlist 和 Sunrise 后将其关闭为例,认为这种有争议的"收购并扼杀"策略可能损害创新和竞争。
The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether Big Tech companies acquire promising startups to eliminate potential competitors. Critics cite Microsoft's purchases of Wunderlist and Sunrise, which were later shut down, as examples of this controversial "buy and kill" strategy that may harm innovation and competition.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进考研英语高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • scrap 废弃、终止(某个项目或产品)

    让我们把这些clues串联起来:首先,however标记出从success到某种negative outcome的转折;然后,closed them down这个explicit expression直接解释了scrapped的含义;最后,全文反复出现的kill、close down构成了一个consistent semantic pattern。这三条线索相互印证,形成了一个完整的reasoning chain

    转折定向→近距同义→全文语义场验证
  • remorseless 无情的、冷酷无情的、毫不留情的

    让我们integrate these clues:从word formation看,-less告诉我们这是lacking某种quality;从immediate context看,它修饰的是chew up这种destructive behavior;从broader discourse看,整段都是moral criticism。三个layers共同指向一个meaning:没有remorse,也就是没有guilt或compassion,即ruthless、merciless

    词缀拆解→搭配定位→语篇定性
  • momentum 势头、动力(指事物发展的推进力量)

    综合三条clues:temporal logic告诉我们momentum是development过程中的crucial element;concrete examples展示了从buzz到被killed的trajectory,中间missing的就是momentum;collocation analysis确认momentum是gradually accumulated的power。结合起来,momentum指的是businesses在成长过程中积累的forward-moving force or power

    时序定位→案例具象→搭配验证
  • rifle 快速翻查、仔细搜索(大量物品或信息)

    把clues连起来:contrast structure确立了rifling through是针对numerous small deals的processing action;object characteristics暗示这是sorting through scattered items的动作;cross-paragraph reference明确这是regulatory examination。综合判断,rifling through表示快速而仔细地翻查、检视

    结构定性→功能定位→语域定调
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

  • 引语运用

    P3

    文章通过 quote 了 Paul Arnold 这位 venture capital partner 的 direct speech："They bought the seedlings and closed them down"，这个 metaphor 把 start-ups 比作 seedlings，生动地 illustrate 了大公司对创新企业的扼杀。这个 quotation 不仅提供了 credible evidence，还通过 vivid imagery 强化了文章对 Big Tech 采取 anti-competitive practices 的 critical stance，让 argument 更有 persuasive power。

    信号词 complained said commented noted argued stated claimed pointed out admitted acknowledged

    仿写： 当你想 criticize 某个 controversial practice 时，不要 directly state your opinion，而是找一个 authoritative figure 的 quote 来 support your point。比如写科技垄断问题时，可以这样：某位 regulatory expert 指出："These companies are not just buying products, they're buying silence。" 仿写模版：[Topic introduction] + [Authority figure] + commented/noted/complained + "[Vivid quote with metaphor or strong imagery]" + [Brief context of the quote]。

  • 数据引用

    P6

    文章在 第6段 中 deploy 了 multiple statistics：combined market value 超过 $5.5 trillion，average spending 仅 $3.4 billion per year on small acquisitions，以及 $130 billion 的 venture capital investment。这些 figures 形成 striking contrast，通过 quantitative evidence 展示这些 deals 对大公司来说是 "a drop in the ocean"，但实际上可能对 innovation ecosystem 产生 significant impact。这种 data-driven approach 让 argument 更 objective 和 convincing。

    信号词 $ billion trillion percent % million average more than less than over compared with

    仿写： 当你需要 illustrate the scale 或 significance of an issue 时，strategic use of statistics 非常有效。关键是要 create meaningful comparisons。比如讨论教育投入时可以写：该地区 annual education budget 仅有 $50 million，相比之下 neighboring region 投入超过 $200 million，而全国 average 是 $150 million。仿写模版：[Present key figure] + [Provide comparative context with contrasting numbers] + [Use metaphor like 'a drop in the ocean' to emphasize the disparity] + [Connect back to main argument]。

  • 对比手法

    P1 P2 P4 P6

    文章在多处运用 contrast 来 highlight contradictions。第1段 和 第2段 形成 before-after contrast：先描述 Wunderlist 和 Sunrise 如何 attract buzz 和 represent new wave，然后 reveal 它们被 scrapped 的 fate。第4段 中 Arnold 的 mixed feelings 也体现 internal contrast："good for me" versus "good for the American economy"。这些 contrasts 不仅 create dramatic tension，更 expose 了大公司 acquisition strategy 背后的 ethical dilemma 和 economic implications。

    信号词 however but while although though whereas in contrast on the other hand yet nevertheless despite

    仿写： 建立 effective contrast 需要 carefully select 两个具有 inherent tension 的 elements。可以是 temporal sequence（曾经繁荣 vs 如今衰落），可以是 stakeholder perspectives（投资者获利 vs 公众利益受损），也可以是 scale mismatch（巨额资产 vs 微小支出）。比如写环保议题：该公司 publicly champion sustainability initiatives，然而 internal documents reveal 它们 continue to invest billions in fossil fuel projects。仿写模版：[Establish positive/initial state with vivid descriptors] + however/but + [Reveal contrasting negative/subsequent reality] + [Optional: explicit statement of the contradiction]。

  • 背景交代

    P1 P5

    第1段 开篇通过 provide historical context（2015年的 acquisitions）和 market background（Microsoft's Office dominance vs. smartphone-era start-ups），为整篇文章 establish foundation。这种 contextualization 让 readers 理解为什么这些 acquisitions matter，以及它们如何 fit into the broader tech landscape。背景信息不是 mere decoration，而是 necessary scaffolding，帮助 readers grasp the significance of 后续的 regulatory investigation。

    信号词 When In [year] Over the past [time period] Historically Previously Until now To date Background Context

    仿写： 写 background section 时，要 identify what readers need to know 才能 understand your main argument。避免 dump all information，而是 selectively present 最 relevant 的 context。Structure your background chronologically 或 from general to specific。比如报道某项新政策：过去十年，该行业 experienced rapid growth but lacked regulation。2020年的 major scandal 引发 public outcry。现在，regulators finally propose comprehensive oversight framework。仿写模版：[Historical context or current state] + [Key event or transition point] + [Present situation that leads to the main story] + [Optional: why this matters]。

  • 客观描述

    P2 P5

    第2段 使用 neutral, factual language 来 describe what happened："Both apps were scrapped" 和 "Microsoft said it had used their best features"。这种 detached tone 让作者能 present controversial information 而不 explicitly take sides。同样，第5段 描述 FTC 的 action 时用 "says it wants to find the answer" 和 "asked for information"，这些都是 objective reporting 的 characteristic phrases，让文章 maintain journalistic credibility。

    信号词 were was said announced reported according to stated indicated showed revealed

    仿写： 练习 objective description 时，focus on verifiable facts 而非 interpretations。使用 neutral verbs（said, announced, reported）而非 evaluative verbs（claimed, insisted, admitted）。Prefer passive voice 在需要 de-emphasize the actor 时。比如写争议事件：该公司 announced layoffs affecting 500 employees。Union representatives were notified two weeks prior. The decision was attributed to market conditions。仿写模版：[State the action in neutral terms] + [Provide factual details] + [Include official explanation if available] + [Avoid adjectives that reveal judgment]。

  • 设问引导

    P4 P5

    第4段 中 Arnold 提出 rhetorical question："But are they good for the American economy? I don't know。" 这个 question 不期待 immediate answer，而是 prompt readers to reflect on the broader implications。通过 pose this question，文章 shift focus from individual interests 到 collective welfare，引导 readers 思考 acquisitions 的 macro-level consequences。这种 technique 既 engage readers intellectually，又 foreshadow 了 第5段 中 FTC 想要 find answer 的 investigation。

    信号词 ? But are Is it Does this Should we What about Who decides Where does How can

    仿写： Use rhetorical questions strategically 来 transition from specific cases to broader implications。Question 应该 touch on the core dilemma 或 ethical dimension of your topic。Placement matters：通常在 present concrete examples 之后 pose question，让 readers 已经有足够 context to engage with it。比如讨论 AI 监管：Several companies already deployed facial recognition without consent. Who decides where the line should be drawn? 仿写模版：[Present concrete situation or facts] + [Pose question that raises broader implication] + [Optional: acknowledge uncertainty with 'I don't know' or similar phrase]。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 微软收购初创公司后关闭产品暗示垄断意图

    P2
    Both apps, however, were later scrapped, after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products.

    转折类 however but yet nevertheless nonetheless still though

    这个 implication 通过 however 制造的 contrast 暗示：Microsoft 收购 promising startups 不是为了 nurture them，而是为了 extract their technology 然后 shut them down。「Used their best features」这个 euphemism 实际上意味着 copied and killed。这对 article's main point 非常 crucial，因为它提供了 concrete evidence 支撑后文的「buy and kill」strategy accusation。Without this implication，后面 critics 的 complaints 就缺乏 factual basis。

  • 批评者用隐喻性表达揭示科技巨头扼杀创新的本质

    P3
    They bought the seedlings and closed them down, complained Paul Arnold, putting an end to businesses that might one day turn into competitors.

    隐喻类 seedlings chew up swallow devour strangle crush smother

    Paul Arnold 使用「bought the seedlings and closed them down」这个 metaphor 的 implication 是：Big Tech 不是在 fair competition，而是在 systematically destroying potential threats when they're still vulnerable。Seedlings 这个意象 evokes sympathy（幼小的 plants 被无情 destroyed），while「chew up」暗示 predatory behavior。这对 main thesis 至关重要，因为它 frames 这些 acquisitions 不是 normal business practice，而是 anti-competitive predation。这个 loaded language 为 FTC investigation 提供了 moral justification。

  • 投资人承认自身利益与经济利益冲突

    P4
    he admits to mixed feelings about the result: 'I think these things are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? I don't know.'

    让步类 admits to mixed feelings admits mixed feelings conflicted torn ambivalent on the fence

    Arnold 这段话的 deep implication 是：即使是 direct beneficiaries（venture capitalists who profit from selling to Big Tech）也对这个 system 感到 moral unease。「If I put my selfish hat on」这个 conditional phrase 暗示 without that selfish perspective，he wouldn't think it's good。The rhetorical question「are they good for the American economy?」followed by「I don't know」实际上是 implied negative answer。这对 article 的 persuasive power 极其重要，因为它显示 even insiders 认为这个 practice 是 problematic，给 FTC's investigation 增加了 legitimacy。这是 powerful evidence，因为 criticism comes from unexpected source。

  • FTC调查意味着监管态度转变

    P5
    the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach

    时间对比类 until now have been beyond their reach until now for the first time previously historically in the past traditionally

    这个 phrase 的 implication 是多层的：首先，「beyond their reach」暗示 Big Tech 长期以来 operated in a regulatory vacuum，can do whatever they want in early-stage acquisitions。其次，「until now」signals 这个 situation 即将 end，regulatory oversight 要来了。第三，「wading into」suggests regulators 是 deliberately and carefully entering 这个 previously untouched area。对 main point 来说，这个 implication crucial 因为它暗示 FTC's investigation 不是 random，而是 intentional effort to address 一个 long-standing regulatory gap。它也 foreshadows potential regulatory action，给 article 增加了 forward-looking dimension。

  • 小额收购规模被有意淡化以质疑其重要性

    P6
    Given their combined market value of more than $5.5 trillion, rifling through such small deals—many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise—might seem beside the point.

    让步反驳类 might seem beside the point might seem may appear on the surface at first glance ostensibly seemingly

    这句话的 implication 是 sophisticated 的：表面上作者 acknowledging 一个 reasonable concern（$3.4 billion seems tiny compared to $5.5 trillion market cap），但「might seem beside the point」中的「might seem」暗示 this impression 是 misleading。「A drop in the ocean」这个 metaphor 进一步 emphasizes 数字上的 insignificance。但整个 setup 的 purpose 是让 reader 形成这个 impression，然后在 第7段 用「however, critics say」来 reveal 真正的 issue 不是 money amount，而是 strategic impact on competition。这对 article structure 很重要，因为它 creates suspense 和 builds toward the「buy and kill」revelation，同时 pre-empts 一个 obvious objection to FTC's investigation。

  • 收购战略的真实意图通过评论者视角揭示

    P7
    However, critics say the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a 'buy and kill' tactic to simply close them down.

    归因表达类 critics say opponents argue some contend detractors claim skeptics point out observers note analysts suggest

    「Critics say」这个 attribution 的 deep implication 是：journalist 在 strategically using 这个 framework 来 present serious accusations（buy and kill, eliminate competitors）while maintaining plausible deniability。通过说 critics say，作者避免 direct responsibility for these claims，但文章的 entire structure 和 evidence selection 都 support 这个 critical narrative。注意「buy and kill」这个 dramatic phrase 被放在 quotes 里，suggesting it's a recognized term 而不只是 one critic's rhetoric。对 main thesis，这个 implication 是 culminating point：它 explicitly names 前面各段 implicitly building toward 的 strategy。整个 article 用 evidence 和 examples 铺垫，最后用「critics say」deliver 这个 accusation，这是 carefully structured persuasive narrative，不是 neutral reporting。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度：消极批判

结论先行：本文作者态度为消极批判（ Critical and concerned）。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇措辞定调 P1 P2

    新闻报道的 lead paragraph 通常会 set the tone，这里用 scrapped 而不是 integrated 或 incorporated，already hints at 一种 negative framing，表明作者对这种 acquisition practice 持 critical view

  2. 引用来源不对等 P3 P4

    新闻报道通过 source selection 来 shape narrative。这篇文章给了 critics 大量的 voice 和 vivid language，而 Microsoft declined to comment，这种 imbalanced representation 说明作者 aligns with 批评的 perspective

  3. 叙事递进扩大化 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    这种 progressive structure 从 anecdotal evidence 到 systemic concerns 再到 government action，是 investigative 或 critical reporting 的 typical pattern。作者通过这个 narrative arc 来 suggest 这不仅是 isolated incidents，而是 requires regulatory scrutiny 的 broader problem

  4. 结尾强化批判 P7

    News articles 的 conclusion 往往 crystallize author's perspective。这里 ending on critics' accusation of buy and kill without offering rebuttals or mitigating factors，reinforces 整篇文章的 critical tone 并 leaves readers with concern rather than reassurance

  5. 多维信号综合 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    单个 signal 可能 ambiguous，但当 multiple indicators align in the same direction 时，author's attitude becomes clear。这篇文章所有的 rhetorical choices 都 point towards disapproval，从 word selection 到 source emphasis 到 narrative structure，forming a unified critical perspective

文中的态度信号词

  • scrapped P2

    Scrapped 这个词带有 strong negative connotation，暗示 wasteful 和 disrespectful treatment。作者本可以用 neutral terms 像 discontinued 或 retired，但选择 scrapped 来 emphasize the abrupt and dismissive nature 的 action，revealing disapproval

    同类词 shut down closed down killed terminated discontinued

  • remorseless P3

    Remorseless 是个 highly charged adjective，描绘 Big Tech 为 lacking conscience 的 entity。这种 moralizing language goes beyond factual description，directly characterizing behavior as unethical，showing 作者 endorses this critical characterization

    同类词 ruthless relentless merciless callous heartless

  • chew up P3

    Chew up 是 vivid metaphor 把 Big Tech 比作 predatory animal，把 start-ups 比作 helpless prey。这种 animalistic imagery creates visceral negative reaction，远比 neutral terms like 'acquire' 更 emotionally powerful，indicating 作者 wants readers to feel alarmed

    同类词 devour swallow up gobble up consume absorb

  • complained P3

    Complained 作为 reporting verb 虽然表面 neutral，但 implies the speaker has a grievance。作者可以用 said、noted、pointed out 等更 neutral verbs，选择 complained suggests 作者 acknowledges the validity of the grievance 而不是 dismissing it as mere opinion

    同类词 criticized condemned denounced protested objected

  • declined to comment P3

    Declined to comment 虽然 factually accurate，但 strategically placed after strong criticism 来 create impression of evasion or guilt。作者通过 juxtaposition 让 Microsoft's silence seem like inability to defend rather than professional discretion，supporting the critics' narrative

    同类词 refused to respond did not reply remained silent no response unavailable for comment

  • buy and kill P7

    Buy and kill 是 accusatory phrase 把正常的 business practice 描述为 deliberate destruction strategy。Kill 这个词 particularly emotive，suggesting intentional harm。作者 presenting this as critics' view but giving it the final word without rebuttal，effectively endorsing this framing

    同类词 kill zone predatory acquisition anti-competitive practice monopolistic behavior market manipulation

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇新闻报道

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例，可直接迁移到其他考研英语 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇新闻报道？

  1. 具体事件+时间标记 P1

    第1段 开头就给出了 concrete event:Microsoft bought Wunderlist and Sunrise in 2015。这是典型的 news lead,直接告诉读者 who did what and when。议论文会先提出 viewpoint,说明文会先界定 concept,但新闻报道prioritize factual events at the beginning。

  2. 多方引述+直接引语 P3 P4

    第3段 出现了 Paul Arnold 的 direct complaint:"They bought the seedlings and closed them down",第4段 继续引用 Mr. Arnold 的 mixed feelings。这种 incorporating external voices 是新闻报道的典型特征。议论文主要是作者 own reasoning,说明文是 objective explanation without personal voices。

  3. 机构动态+官方举措 P5

    第5段 提到 The US Federal Trade Commission 的 concrete action:it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information this week。这是典型的 institutional news element,报道 regulatory body 的 specific move。议论文不会花篇幅报道 institutional actions,说明文不会focus on current events。

  4. 量化数据+事实背景 P6

    第6段 密集呈现 figures:combined market value of more than $5.5 trillion,average of only $3.4 billion a year,sub-$1 billion acquisitions,more than $130 billion of venture capital。这些 specific numbers 是为了 contextualize the story with factual evidence。议论文可能用数据,但主要服务于 argument;说明文的数据用于 illustrate concepts,而新闻的数据是为了 report the scale and significance of events。

  5. 事件驱动+多源叙事 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    这篇文章从 specific acquisition event 开始,引入 critics' views 和 investor perspectives,报道 FTC's investigation,最后给出 market data context。整个 structure 是 unfolding a developing story with multiple angles,而不是 building an argument toward a conclusion 或 explaining how something works step by step。这是典型的 news article architecture。

哪些词暴露了新闻报道体裁？

  • bought P1 核心事实概括词 were later scrapped said declined to comment says asked
  • in 2015 P1 即时性时间与地点词 over the past decade This week over the past five years last year
  • said P2 新闻来源与引用词 complained admits declined to comment says
  • This week P5 即时性时间与地点词 in 2015 over the past decade at this stage until now over the past five years
  • complained P3 新闻来源与引用词 said admits declined to comment says
  • declined to comment P3 新闻来源与引用词 said says complained admits
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

7 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 的常见问题

2021年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (3) 文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 的原文出自哪里？
Financial Times《金融时报》2020年2月13日文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny(大型科技公司的“买了即杀”策略受到政府审查)。
2021年考研英语二真题文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 的主旨是什么？
美国联邦贸易委员会正在调查大型科技公司是否通过收购有前途的初创企业来消除潜在竞争对手。批评者以微软收购 Wunderlist 和 Sunrise 后将其关闭为例,认为这种有争议的"收购并扼杀"策略可能损害创新和竞争。（英文表述：The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether Big Tech companies acquire promising startups to eliminate potential competitors. Critics cite Microsoft's purchases of Wunderlist and Sunrise, which were later shut down, as examples of this controversial "buy and kill" strategy that may harm innovation and competition.）
Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny（2021年考研英语二真题文章）是什么体裁？难度如何？
体裁为新闻报道，作者立场是消极批判（Critical and concerned）。CEFR 难度 C1，全文 401 词、7 段；在考研英语二全部 94 篇真题文章中，C1 级共 72 篇（占 77%）。
2021年考研英语二真题文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 的篇章结构是怎样的？
全文 7 段按新闻报道骨架分为 7 个意群：第1段——引出事件背景；第2段——揭示收购结局；第3段——引入批评声音；第4段——呈现立场矛盾；第5段——引出监管行动；第6段——质疑调查意义；第7段——回归批评核心。
Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 一文的作者态度是什么？
作者态度是消极批判（Critical and concerned）。判断路径：开篇措辞定调 → 引用来源不对等 → 叙事递进扩大化 → 结尾强化批判 → 多维信号综合；文中的态度信号词包括 scrapped（第2段）、remorseless（第3段）、chew up（第3段）、complained（第3段）、declined to comment（第3段）、buy and kill（第7段）。
2021年考研英语二真题文章 Big Tech's'buy and kill’ tacticscome under scrutiny 中有哪些值得积累的生词？
按文中出现顺序共 4 个：scrap（废弃、终止(某个项目或产品)）、remorseless（无情的、冷酷无情的、毫不留情的）、momentum（势头、动力(指事物发展的推进力量)）、rifle（快速翻查、仔细搜索(大量物品或信息)），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新：