懒笔记
2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce
CET-4 · 来自 2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 · Part III Section C (1) · 阅读理解（四选一）

Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce

《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》 —— 2019年6月英语四级真题第1套文章逐层精读

本文选自2014年4 月28日发表在www. news.umich.edu“(密歇根大学官网)上的一篇标题为“Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce” (《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》)的文章。

本页是 2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇新闻报道全文 341 词、8 段，CEFR 难度 C1（C1 级在英语四级文章中占 32%），作者立场为「积极支持」；英文原文之外，本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开，其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法（篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判）随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号（P1）都可以点——点一下，原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段，解析引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文，你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 的阅读理解（四选一）原文，共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析（结构、逐段、修辞、自检题）都以它为坐标回指原文，点击解析里的段号，原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮；合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态，不带翻译与标注。

Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce

In the classic marriage vow(誓约), couples promise to stay together in sickness and in health. But a new study finds that the risk of divorce among older couples rises when the wife—not the husband—becomes seriously ill.

"Married women diagnosed with a serious health condition may find themselves struggling with the impact of their disease while also experiencing the stress of divorce," said researcher Amelia Karraker.

Karraker and co-author Kenzie Latham analyzed 20 years of data on 2,717 marriages from a study conducted by Indiana University since 1992. At the time of the first interview, at least one of the partners was over the age of 50.

The researchers examined how the onset(发生) of four serious physical illnesses affected marriages. They found that, overall, 31% of marriages ended in divorce over the period studied. The incidence of new chronic(慢性的) illness onset increased over time as well, with more husbands than wives developing serious health problems.

"We found that women are doubly vulnerable to marital break-up in the face of illness," Karraker said. "They're more likely to be widowed, and if they're the ones who become ill, they're more likely to get divorced."

While the study didn't assess why divorce is more likely when wives but not husbands become seriously ill, Karraker offers a few possible reasons. "Gender norms and social expectations about caregiving may make it more difficult for men to provide care to sick spouses," Karraker said. "And because of the imbalance in marriage markets, especially in older ages, divorced men have more choices among prospective partners than divorced women."

Given the increasing concern about health care costs for the aging population, Karraker believes policymakers should be aware of the relationship between disease and risk of divorce.

"Offering support services to spouses caring for their other halves may reduce marital stress and prevent divorce at older ages," she said. "But it's also important to recognize that the pressure to divorce may be health-related and that sick ex-wives may need additional care and services to prevent worsening health and increased health costs."

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

8 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读，并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Illness and Divorce Risk

    A study finds that older couples face a higher divorce risk when wives become seriously ill.

    本段是全文的新闻导语，直接提出文章主旨中的核心现象：妻子患病与老年婚姻离婚风险上升相关。后文的 researcher、data、reasons 和 policy suggestions 都是在解释、验证并回应这一 startling finding。

    锁定转折后的性别差异
  2. P2

    A Double Burden for Sick Wives

    Seriously ill wives may experience the combined stress of illness and divorce.

    本段紧接首段，说明妻子患病后离婚风险上升意味着什么：她们可能在健康脆弱时失去婚姻支持。它使全文的主旨不只是一个 statistical pattern，也成为一个值得关注的社会问题。

    拆分疾病与离婚双压力
  3. P3

    The Study Sample and Data

    The study used 20 years of data from 2,717 marriages among older adults.

    本段为首段的研究结论提供 evidence base，告诉读者该发现并非个别故事，而是来自长期、较大样本的分析。它也限定了全文结论主要适用于至少一方超过50岁的婚姻，而不能随意推广到所有年龄群体。

    提取样本、年限与年龄
  4. P4

    Divorce and Illness Patterns

    The study examined serious illnesses and reported divorce and illness patterns in older marriages.

    本段进一步呈现研究的观察范围和总体数据，使文章从一个醒目的 headline finding 进入较完整的实证背景。尤其是丈夫患病更多这一信息，反衬出离婚风险的差异不能简单归因于妻子患病更频繁。

    区分主数据与对照数据
  5. P5

    Women's Double Vulnerability

    Women are doubly vulnerable to marital loss, especially when they become ill.

    本段把前文的具体发现提升为更鲜明的社会结论：女性在晚年婚姻中承受不对称风险。它强化了文章主旨中的 gender disparity，并自然引出下一段对这一差异成因的讨论。

    用双重脆弱统摄两类风险
  6. P6

    Possible Reasons for the Gender Gap

    Gendered caregiving expectations and unequal remarriage prospects may explain the higher divorce risk for sick wives.

    本段承担全文的“why”功能，为文章主旨中的性别差异提供两个可能机制。它将个人离婚行为放回 gender norms 和婚恋市场结构中理解，因此使报道的分析层次更深入。

    并列照护规范与再婚机会
  7. P7

    A Policy Concern

    Policymakers should consider the connection between illness and divorce risk among older adults.

    本段是从解释问题到回应问题的过渡段，它说明该研究不仅关乎私人婚姻，也可能影响医疗支出与老龄社会治理。由此，文章主旨中的“urging policymakers”获得明确的逻辑依据。

    锁定政策主体与关注关系
  8. P8

    Support Services for At-Risk Women and Couples

    Support services should help caregiving spouses and sick ex-wives reduce divorce-related health harms.

    本段是全文的结论和对策落点，将前文的研究发现转化为具体社会支持建议。它完整回应文章主旨：面对妻子患病时更高的离婚风险，政策既应帮助婚内照护者，也应保护离婚后的患病女性。

    对应对象、措施与效果
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

8 道逐段细节自检题

针对2019年6月英语四级真题第1套这篇原文，每段配 1 道细节题（ 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ，由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制，非试卷原题）。 选项默认中性；点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法，现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 new study risk of divorce

    What does the new study find about the risk of divorce among older couples?

    • A It rises when the husband becomes seriously ill.
    • B It rises regardless of which partner becomes ill.
    • C It rises when the wife becomes seriously ill.
    • D It decreases when the wife is in good health.
    • E It remains stable among older couples over time.
    • F It is not affected by the couple's health conditions.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    正确项对应原文 the risk of divorce ... rises when the wife—not the husband—becomes seriously ill。它保留了 rises 的变化方向、wife 这一主体以及 seriously ill 这一条件。破折号中的 not the husband 构成显著障碍，考生若忽略否定插入语，就可能把比较对象错误地当成触发条件。

    双词共现核对条件主体 时间最紧张时，以 new study 和 risk of divorce 进行双词共现扫描，直接定位 第1段。命中后只读取 rises、when 引导的条件以及破折号中的否定对比，再选择完整保留这三层逻辑的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 married women diagnosed with a serious health condition

    According to Amelia Karraker, what may married women diagnosed with a serious health condition find themselves struggling with?

    • A Only the impact of the disease.
    • B Only the stress of divorce.
    • C Financial difficulties caused by medical bills.
    • D The impact of their disease and the stress of divorce.
    • E Social isolation and loss of friends.
    • F A lack of proper medical treatment.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    原文说明这些女性一方面 struggling with the impact of their disease，同时 also experiencing the stress of divorce。正确项保留 disease impact 与 divorce stress 两个并列内容，并用 and 准确概括 while also 表达的同时性。

    长短语定位并列宾语 紧急情况下，直接扫描 diagnosed with a serious health condition，在 第2段 锁定引语。随后只提取 struggling with 与 while also 后面的两个并列名词短语，选择同时覆盖二者的正确项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 20 years

    What do we learn about the data analyzed by Karraker and Latham?

    • A It only includes couples under 50 years old.
    • B The data was collected from only one hospital.
    • C All partners were over 50 at the first interview.
    • D It was analyzed by a team of doctors.
    • E It covers 20 years and involves marriages from a study started in 1992.
    • F The study ended in 1992.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：E

    原文说明研究者 analyzed 20 years of data，并指出这些数据来自 Indiana University since 1992 开展的 study。正确项保留时间跨度与研究起始年份，没有把 since 误解为结束时间，也没有篡改受访者年龄条件。

    数字定位量词验真 时间紧张时，从选项提取 20 years 并定位到 第3段，再在同一信息区核对 1992 与 since 的时间关系。随后优先排除含 all、only 或 ended 的范围及时间反转项，选择保持原有时间跨度的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 31% of marriages ended in divorce more husbands than wives

    What were the general findings regarding the marriages studied?

    • A Most marriages ended in divorce.
    • B Wives were more likely to develop serious health problems.
    • C The divorce rate decreased over the period studied.
    • D The onset of new chronic illness led to immediate divorce.
    • E No marriage ended in divorce when wives were healthy.
    • F 31% of marriages ended in divorce, and more husbands than wives developed serious health problems.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：F

    正确项保留了原文 31% of marriages ended in divorce 的统计结果，也准确保留 more husbands than wives developing serious health problems 的人数比较。它没有把人数较多进一步推断为男性个体患病概率更高，因此未超出来源段落能够支持的范围。

    百分比加人数比较验真 直接用 31% 定位 第4段，再核对同段的 more husbands than wives。选择同时保持百分比、统计对象和人数比较方向的正确项，并立即排除 most、more likely、decreased 与 immediate 等强化或换维度表达。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 doubly vulnerable to marital break-up

    What does Karraker mean by saying women are 'doubly vulnerable to marital break-up'?

    • A They are more likely to be widowed and more likely to get divorced.
    • B They face double the financial burden after divorce.
    • C They become ill twice as often as men.
    • D They are twice as likely to initiate divorce.
    • E They suffer from both disease and poverty.
    • F They are less likely to remarry after divorce.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：A

    原文用 more likely to be widowed 和 more likely to get divorced 两个并列结构解释 doubly vulnerable。正确项完整保留两个 outcome，没有增加倍数、经济后果或主动提出离婚等原文未说明的信息。

    引语后提取双重平行结构 直接用完整引语定位 第5段，并只阅读其后的解释句。抓取两个平行的 more likely 结构，选择同时保留两个 outcome 的正确项，排除把 doubly 误写成 twice 或 double 数值关系的选项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 more difficult for men to provide care

    According to Karraker, what may make it more difficult for men to provide care to sick spouses?

    • A Men's physical inability to do housework.
    • B Gender norms and social expectations about caregiving.
    • C Wives' refusal to accept care from husbands.
    • D Lack of medical facilities for home care.
    • E Financial strain on the household.
    • F Divorced men having more choices in the marriage market.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：B

    原文直接以 Gender norms and social expectations about caregiving 作主语，并用 may make it more difficult 连接到男性照护患病配偶的困难。正确项完整复现了这一直接原因。

    结果定位后左取句法主语 以 more difficult for men to provide care 定位 第6段，命中后直接向左读取 may make 的主语，将该主语对应的选项判为正确项。提到 marriage market 或 choices 的选项属于同段另一条解释，可立即排除。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 policymakers should be aware of

    What does Karraker believe policymakers should be aware of?

    • A The increasing health care costs for the aging population.
    • B The stress experienced by caregivers.
    • C The relationship between disease and risk of divorce.
    • D The imbalance in the marriage market for older adults.
    • E The need for more health insurance for women.
    • F The high divorce rate among young couples.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：C

    原文明确说 policymakers should be aware of the relationship between disease and risk of divorce。正确项直接对应 aware of 的宾语，没有把 Given 引导的 health care costs 背景误作答案。

    锁定政策主体直取介词宾语 直接扫描 policymakers 并定位 第7段，然后越过 should be aware of，读取其后的完整宾语，将对应选项作为正确项。句首 Given 引导的 health care costs 只作背景，应直接排除。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 reduce marital stress and prevent divorce

    What does Karraker suggest as a way to reduce marital stress and prevent divorce at older ages?

    • A Encouraging sick wives to seek divorce early.
    • B Increasing healthcare funding for elderly couples.
    • C Enforcing stricter gender norms about caregiving.
    • D Offering support services to spouses caring for their other halves.
    • E Requiring couples to attend marriage counseling.
    • F Providing financial incentives for staying married.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案：D

    原文以 Offering support services to spouses caring for their other halves 这一动名词短语作句子主语，并以 may reduce marital stress and prevent divorce 说明其可能效果。正确项准确提取了措施部分，没有改变服务对象或措施性质。

    结果定位后左取动名词主语 用 reduce marital stress and prevent divorce 定位 第8段 的首个引语句，再向左提取 may 的动名词主语，并选择与该主语一致的正确项。其余未在句中出现的常见政策措施可直接排除。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的新闻报道骨架

按新闻报道 的行文骨架切分意群，每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇，能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. P1

    研究发现：妻子患病导致离婚率上升

    这个 lead paragraph 直接抛出了 newsworthy finding，通过 classic marriage vow 和 new study 的对比来制造 tension，pointing out 一个 counterintuitive discovery：当 wife becomes seriously ill 时，older couples 的 divorce risk 反而 rises，但 husband 生病却没有这种 pattern

    作为新闻报道的 opening，这个 paragraph 用 hook 的方式 present 了整篇文章的 central finding，immediately grab reader's attention 并建立起文章要探讨的 core issue，为后续的 elaboration 和 explanation 奠定基础

    揭示核心现象
  2. P2

    研究者解读：患病女性面临双重压力

    这个 paragraph 引入了 researcher Amelia Karraker 的 direct quote，providing authoritative interpretation of the finding，强调 married women with serious health conditions 会 struggle with 两方面的 stress：disease impact 和 divorce stress，这是对前面 discovery 的 expert commentary

    作为新闻报道中的 expert voice，这个 quote 为 headline finding 提供了 authoritative context，helping readers understand the human impact behind the statistics，同时 establish 了 researcher 作为 credible source 的地位，为文章增加 journalistic credibility

    点明影响维度
  3. P3 P4

    研究方法：20年数据追踪

    这两个 paragraphs 构成了 methodology section，detailing 研究的 data source (20 years, 2,717 marriages)、研究 design (Indiana University study since 1992)，以及 key findings：31% divorce rate 和 chronic illness onset patterns，providing statistical foundation for the claims

    这个 section 在新闻报道中 serve 了 credibility function，通过 present 具体的 research methodology 和 statistical data 来 substantiate 前面提出的 findings，让 readers 了解 conclusion 是 based on rigorous analysis，而不是 speculation

    呈现研究证据
  4. P5

    研究结论：女性的双重脆弱性

    这个 paragraph 用另一个 researcher quote 来 synthesize 研究的 core conclusion，用 'doubly vulnerable' 这个 powerful phrase 来 encapsulate women's situation：更可能 be widowed，并且生病时更可能 get divorced，这是对前面 data 的 interpretive summary

    这个 quote 在新闻结构中 act as a pivot point，它 recapitulate 前面的 findings 用一个 memorable phrase ('doubly vulnerable')，同时 set up 接下来对 underlying reasons 的 exploration，是从 'what' 向 'why' transition 的关键节点

    强化核心论点
  5. P6

    原因分析：性别规范与婚姻市场

    这个 paragraph 转入 causal analysis，researcher 提供了 possible explanations：gender norms 让 men 更难 provide care to sick spouses，以及 marriage market imbalance 让 divorced men 比 divorced women 有 more partner choices，这是对现象背后 mechanisms 的探讨

    在新闻报道的 structure 中，这个 section 完成了从 description 到 explanation 的 shift，providing sociological context 来 help readers understand why the pattern exists，增加了文章的 analytical depth 并回答了 audience 可能有的 'why' question

    解析成因机制
  6. P7 P8

    政策建议：支持服务的必要性

    最后两个 paragraphs 构成 policy implication section，researcher 建议 policymakers 注意 disease 和 divorce 的 relationship，并提出 concrete solutions：为 caregiving spouses 提供 support services 来 reduce marital stress，以及为 sick ex-wives 提供 additional care，这是从 research 到 practical application 的延伸

    作为新闻报道的 closing section，这部分完成了从 academic research 到 real-world relevance 的 connection，demonstrating 研究的 practical value 并 providing actionable recommendations，让文章具有 policy significance 而不仅是 informational value

    提供应对方案
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出，每步说明看哪里、看出什么，可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首段转折后核心发现 P1

    新闻报道 news report 通常在 opening paragraph 就呈现 key finding 或 main discovery，而 'But' 这类 contrastive marker 后面往往是 unexpected result 或 counterintuitive finding，这正是文章要 highlight 的 central point

  2. 引语中负面评价词 P2 P5

    研究者的 direct quotations 往往用 value-laden words 来 emphasize study implications。像 'doubly vulnerable' 这种 intensified expression 直接点明了 severity of the issue，能帮助我们 grasp 文章想要 convey 的 alarming pattern

  3. 原因解释段落因素 P6

    当文章 shift from presenting findings 到 explaining mechanisms 时，会用 'may' 'might' 'could' 等 modal verbs 来 introduce possible reasons。这些 explanatory paragraphs 虽然是 speculative，但它们 reveal underlying factors behind the main finding，帮助我们 understand 文章主旨的 deeper dimensions

  4. 结尾政策建议 P7 P8

    新闻报道 especially research-focused ones 常在 conclusion 部分 pivot to actionable suggestions。'Should be aware' 'need to recognize' 这类 prescriptive language 表明 researcher 认为 issue 具有 practical significance，从而 reinforce 文章主旨的 importance and urgency

  5. 四段式逻辑串联 P1 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

    新闻报道的 main idea 不是单一 sentence 而是 layered message。通过 connect opening hook (wives face higher divorce risk when ill) 与 middle explanation (gender norms) 再到 ending call-to-action (policy support)，我们能 form complete understanding of 文章想 communicate 的 complex issue

主旨信号词 doubly vulnerable P5 more likely P1 may make it more difficult P6 should be aware of P7

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

一项研究揭示,当妻子患重病时,老年夫妻离婚的可能性更高,而丈夫患病时则不然。研究人员认为性别护理规范和再婚前景不平等导致了这种差异,并敦促政策制定者提供支持服务。
A study reveals that older marriages are more likely to end in divorce when wives become seriously ill, compared to when husbands fall ill. Researchers suggest gender caregiving norms and unequal remarriage prospects contribute to this disparity, urging policymakers to provide support services.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

6 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典，只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • vow 誓言；郑重承诺

    让我们把这两条 clue 串联起来。首先，marriage vow 出现在婚礼的 context 中，紧接着用 promise to stay together 来具体说明 vow 的内容。这种 explanation pattern 告诉我们：vow 就是一种 promise，而且是在 marriage ceremony 这样的正式场合下做出的承诺。

    利用同位解释和场景限定
  • diagnose 诊断；确诊

    现在让我们整合这些 clues。首先，diagnosed 出现在 medical context 中，与 serious health condition 和 physical illnesses 紧密相关。其次，passive structure（women diagnosed）表明这是医生对患者执行的 action。最后，它与 onset of illness 形成 semantic parallel，指向疾病被确认的那个 moment。综合来看，diagnose 应该是医学上确定疾病的过程。

    动词搭配、语法结构和专业领域三维定位
  • assess 评估；评价

    让我们把这两条 clues 连接起来。首先，assess 的 object 是一个 why question，说明它涉及 causal analysis。其次，通过 contrast（study 没做 assess，但研究者提供了 reasons），可以推断 assess 是一种比简单描述更深入的 evaluation 或 examination。在 research context 中，这应该是对数据或现象进行系统性的评估。

    利用对比结构和宾语类型
  • spouse 配偶

    这两条 clues 非常 straightforward。在 第6段 中，spouses 出现在讨论 husband-wife relationship 的 context 中，是对 husbands/wives 的 generic reference。而 第8段 更直接，用 other halves 这个 colloquial term 来 explain spouses。两条线索共同确认：spouse 就是配偶。

    篇章衔接和正式非正式对应
  • incidence 发生率

    让我们整合这些 statistical clues。首先，incidence 与 increased 搭配，说明它是可量化的 indicator。其次，它的 object 是 illness onset，表明它是衡量疾病发生的 metric。最后，它出现在 statistical reporting context 中，与 percentage 形成 parallel。综合来看，incidence 应该是表示某事件发生频率或比例的统计术语。

    统计语境和数量表达定位
  • vulnerable 脆弱的；易受伤害的

    现在把这三条 clues 整合起来。首先，vulnerable 出现在 negative context 中（illness、break-up），暗示它描述的是 unfavorable state。其次，文章用 more likely to face negative outcomes 来 explain vulnerable，直接揭示其含义是"易受伤害"。最后，-able 后缀从 morphological angle 确认了"易于……"这个语义特征。三者结合，vulnerable 就是"脆弱的、易受伤害的"。

    语境情感、解释句式和后缀分析三管齐下
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认，也能写。

  • 引语运用

    P2 P5 P6 P8

    文章通过多次直接引用 researcher Amelia Karraker 的原话，来增强 findings 的 credibility 和 authority。比如在 第2段 中引用她关于 married women 面临 dual stress 的观点,在 第5段 中引用 'doubly vulnerable' 这个关键表达,在 第6段 和 第8段 中引用她对 causes 和 policy implications 的分析。这些 direct quotes 让读者感受到这不是 journalist 的主观判断,而是来自 academic research 的客观发现,从而强化了 article 关于 gender disparity in divorce risk 这一核心主旨的说服力。

    信号词 said noted explained stated pointed out emphasized argued observed commented added believes

    仿写： 当你在写作 news report 时,要善于识别哪些 key findings 或 insights 最适合用 direct quote 呈现。通常选择那些表达 striking 或 memorable 的观点,比如 'doubly vulnerable' 这种 vivid expression。仿写模版可以是:'[Researcher name] said/noted/explained, "[Key finding or insight that captures attention]."' 或者 '[Quote], [researcher] said.' 记住要在 quote 前后提供适当的 context,让读者理解 why this voice matters。

  • 数据引用

    P3 P4

    Article 运用了 precise numerical data 来支撑其 central claim。在 第3段 中提到 '20 years of data on 2,717 marriages' 和 'since 1992',在 第4段 中引用 '31% of marriages ended in divorce',这些 specific statistics 为文章的 argument 提供了 solid quantitative foundation。这种 data-driven approach 让关于 wife's illness 导致 higher divorce risk 的结论不再是 anecdotal observation,而是基于 large-scale, long-term study 的 empirical finding,从而大大增强了 article 的 scientific rigor 和 persuasiveness。

    信号词 20 years 2,717 31% since 1992 over time more than

    仿写： 在撰写涉及 research findings 的 news report 时,要主动寻找并准确引用 key statistics。优先选择那些能够 illustrate scale 或 demonstrate pattern 的数据。仿写模版:'[Researchers] analyzed [number] years of data on [sample size] [subjects]' 或 '[Percentage/number] of [group] [experienced outcome] over [time period].' 记住要确保 numbers 的 context is clear,让读者理解这些 figures 到底 mean what。

  • 对比手法

    P1 P4 P5 P6

    文章通过 systematic contrast 来突出 gender disparity 这一核心发现。在 第4段 中对比 'more husbands than wives developing serious health problems',但 divorce outcome 却相反。在 第5段 中用 'doubly vulnerable' 概括女性同时面临 widowhood 和 divorce when ill 的双重风险。在 第6段 中对比 divorced men 和 divorced women 在 remarriage market 的不同 prospects。这种 repeated contrasting 让 gender asymmetry 这个主题贯穿全文,清晰地展现了 wives' illness 与 husbands' illness 带来的 drastically different marital outcomes,从而强化了文章关于 unequal vulnerability 的中心论点。

    信号词 but while more than not only...but also whereas however in contrast on the other hand compared to unlike

    仿写： 运用 contrast 时,要选择 meaningful dimensions for comparison,比如 same condition 的 different outcomes 或 similar groups 的 different experiences。可以使用 structural parallelism 来增强 contrasting effect。仿写模版:'While [Group A] [experiences X], [Group B] [experiences Y]' 或 '[Group A] are more likely to [outcome], but [Group B] face [different outcome].' 也可以用 'not only...but also' 结构来 layer contrasts,比如 'not only [disadvantage 1] but also [disadvantage 2]'。关键是让 the contrast serve your main argument。

  • 背景交代

    P1

    Article 开篇通过 classic marriage vow 这个 familiar cultural reference 来建立 emotional and contextual foundation。第1段 的 'in sickness and in health' 这个 traditional promise 立即唤起读者对 marital commitment 的共同认知,然后用 'But' 引出 contradicting reality,形成 dramatic tension。这种 contextual setup 不仅让 subsequent research findings 显得更 striking,也帮助读者理解为何这个 topic matters。通过连接 cultural ideal 和 empirical reality 的 gap,作者成功地 frame the issue 并激发读者的 interest in the disparity。

    信号词 But However Yet While Though Although Despite In contrast to

    仿写： 开篇 contextualization 要选择 readers can relate to 的 reference points。可以是 common beliefs, traditional practices, 或 widely held assumptions。然后用 contrastive transition 引出你要报道的 new finding or problem。仿写模版:'In [traditional belief/common practice], [general statement]. But [new research/recent development] [reveals contrasting reality].' 或 'While [conventional wisdom suggests X], [study/report] shows [Y].' 这种 setup 利用了 readers' existing knowledge 作为 springboard,让新信息更容易被 absorbed and appreciated。

  • 客观描述

    P3 P4

    文章在 第3段 和 第4段 采用 neutral, factual tone 来描述 research methodology 和 findings。比如 'analyzed 20 years of data', 'examined how the onset of four serious physical illnesses affected marriages', 'found that, overall' 等表达都体现了 objective reporting style。这种 straightforward presentation 避免了 emotional language 或 subjective judgment,让 facts speak for themselves。这种 objectivity 对于 news report about sensitive topics 像 gender and health 尤为重要,因为它确保读者能够 form their own opinions based on evidence,而不是被 journalist's bias 所左右,从而维护了 article 的 credibility 和 journalistic integrity。

    信号词 analyzed examined found showed revealed demonstrated observed documented investigated studied assessed

    仿写： 实践 objective reporting 时,选择 neutral action verbs 来描述 research process 和 findings。避免 loaded adjectives 或 intensifiers。仿写模版:'[Researchers] examined/analyzed/investigated [subject] and found that [factual finding].' 或 'The study showed/revealed/demonstrated [result] among [sample].' 使用 passive voice 有时能帮助 maintain objectivity:'[Number/percentage] was observed/recorded/documented.' 记住要 let data and quotes carry the meaning,而 your narrative voice stays in the background 作为 neutral conduit。

  • 设问引导

    P6

    虽然文章没有使用 explicit rhetorical questions,但在 第6段 通过 'While the study didn't assess why...' 这种结构隐含地提出了 underlying question,然后 Karraker 提供 'a few possible reasons'。这种 implicit questioning approach 引导读者思考 'why this disparity exists',然后再给出 potential explanations。这个 technique 在新闻写作中很有效,因为它 anticipates reader's natural curiosity,创造 sense of dialogue,并让 subsequent explanation 显得更 relevant and responsive。通过 addressing the unasked but obvious question,文章展现了 thoroughness 并帮助读者 gain deeper understanding of the causal mechanisms behind the statistical findings。

    信号词 While didn't assess offers may possible reasons might wonder raises the question suggests could explain one reason might be

    仿写： 运用 question-guided structure 时,要 identify natural points of curiosity in your story。可以用 'The study didn't explain/address [question]' 或 'One might wonder why [phenomenon]' 来 introduce an explanatory section。仿写模版:'While [research] didn't [directly address X], [expert] offers/suggests [possible explanations].' 或 '[Finding] raises the question of [why/how], and [source] points to [factors].' 这种 structure 让你的article 显得 more thoughtful and anticipatory of reader needs,同时 providing clear transitions between description and analysis。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

8 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 传统婚姻誓言与现实的讽刺性对比

    P1
    In the classic marriage vow, couples promise to stay together in sickness and in health. But a new study finds that the risk of divorce among older couples rises when the wife—not the husband—becomes seriously ill.

    转折类 But but however yet nevertheless nonetheless still

    这个 implication 通过 classic vow 与 study findings 的 stark contrast,暗示了一个 gender-specific disparity:婚姻中的 caregiving obligation 存在明显的 double standard。言外之意是传统的 marriage commitment 对 wives 来说更加 fragile,她们在 illness 时更容易被 abandon。这为整篇文章的 main argument 奠定了 critical tone,直接点出文章要探讨的 central issue——婚姻中的 gender inequality in illness。这个开头的 ironic contrast 增强了文章的 persuasive power,让读者从一开始就意识到这是一个值得关注的 social problem。

  • 女性患病后的双重困境

    P2
    Married women diagnosed with a serious health condition may find themselves struggling with the impact of their disease while also experiencing the stress of divorce

    并列递进类 struggling with...while also experiencing while also not only...but also both...and simultaneously at the same time in addition to

    这个 implication 揭示了 ill wives 面临的是 compounded trauma——她们不仅要 cope with physical illness,还要 deal with marital breakdown。言外之意是这种 double burden 使她们成为 particularly vulnerable population,处境比 ill husbands 更加 precarious。这直接支撑文章主旨 main thesis 中的 key finding,为后续讨论 why wives are doubly vulnerable 做了 emotional groundwork。它让读者理解这不是简单的 divorce statistics,而是涉及 women's wellbeing 的 serious social issue,强化了文章呼吁 policy intervention 的 urgency。

  • 研究数据的可信度强调

    P3
    Karraker and co-author Kenzie Latham analyzed 20 years of data on 2,717 marriages from a study conducted by Indiana University since 1992.

    数据精确性类 20 years of data on 2,717 marriages 20 years 2,717 marriages 31% exact numbers precise timeframe specific sample size

    这个 implication 通过 detailed methodology 暗示研究结论是 well-founded 而非 speculation。20年的 longitudinal tracking 和近3000个 marriages 的 large sample 都在告诉读者:这个 finding 是 statistically significant 且 reliable。言外之意是文章后面提出的 controversial claim(妻子生病更易离婚)不是 sensationalism,而是 evidence-based conclusion。这对文章主旨至关重要,因为它要 challenge 传统观念 conventional wisdom,必须先建立 scientific authority 才能让读者 take it seriously 并认真考虑 policy implications。

  • 性别不对称的患病模式

    P4
    The incidence of new chronic illness onset increased over time as well, with more husbands than wives developing serious health problems.

    对比类 more husbands than wives more...than less...than fewer...than compared to in contrast to whereas

    这个 implication 通过一个 paradoxical fact 暗示问题的 root cause 不是 medical,而是 social。言外之意是:既然 husbands 生病的 probability 更高,但 divorce risk 却在 wives 生病时 spike,那么导致 divorce 的关键 factor 不是 illness itself,而是 gender-specific responses to caregiving。这为第6段的 explanation(gender norms about caregiving)埋下伏笔 foreshadowing。对文章主旨而言,它强化了 core argument:这是一个 gender inequality issue 而非 health issue,直接支撑了呼吁 policymakers 关注这种 disparity 的必要性。

  • 女性的双重脆弱性

    P5
    We found that women are doubly vulnerable to marital break-up in the face of illness

    程度强化类 doubly vulnerable doubly particularly especially significantly considerably substantially

    这个 implication 通过 doubly 一词明确指出女性在婚姻中的 structural disadvantage。言外之意是:women 不仅在 illness 时更易 divorce,她们还更可能因 husband's death 成为 widow,面临 dual pathways to marital dissolution。这种 compounded vulnerability 揭示了 gender asymmetry 的 depth,暗示需要 targeted interventions 而非 generic solutions。对文章主旨而言,这是 central claim 的 clearest articulation,直接引出后续对 underlying causes(gender norms, remarriage prospects)的讨论,并为最后的 policy recommendations 提供 strongest justification。

  • 研究局限性的坦诚

    P6
    While the study didn't assess why divorce is more likely when wives but not husbands become seriously ill, Karraker offers a few possible reasons.

    限制性表达类 didn't assess why didn't assess may might could possible potential

    这个 implication 通过 explicit acknowledgment of limitations 暗示后续的 explanations 是 theoretical frameworks 而非 empirical proof。言外之意是:虽然 data clearly shows wives' higher divorce risk,但 causation 需要 further research。这种 scholarly honesty 实际上增强了文章的 overall credibility。对文章主旨而言,它提醒读者 findings 是 robust,但 mechanisms 仍需 investigation,同时为提出的 possible explanations(gender norms, remarriage markets)设置了适当的 epistemic status,避免被 critique as overreaching。这对呼吁 policymakers' attention 很重要——即使 causation 未完全 proven,pattern itself 已足够 significant 以 warrant action。

  • 政策制定者的责任暗示

    P7
    Karraker believes policymakers should be aware of the relationship between disease and risk of divorce.

    情态词类 should be aware of should ought to must need to have to it is necessary that

    这个 implication 通过 should 一词暗示 policymakers 目前对此问题的 awareness 不足,且这种 ignorance 是 problematic。言外之意是:given the evidence presented,ignoring this issue 不再是 acceptable option,而是 policy negligence。这为文章的 ultimate goal——advocating for support services——铺平道路。对文章主旨而言,它标志着从 problem identification 到 solution proposal 的 transition,将 academic findings 转化为 actionable recommendations,强调这不仅是 interesting research,更是 urgent social issue requiring governmental response,尤其是在 aging population 和 rising healthcare costs 的 context 下。

  • 干预的双重必要性

    P8
    Offering support services to spouses caring for their other halves may reduce marital stress and prevent divorce at older ages. But it's also important to recognize that the pressure to divorce may be health-related and that sick ex-wives may need additional care and services

    递进补充类 may...But it's also important to but it's also important moreover furthermore in addition additionally what's more

    这个 implication 通过 two-tiered recommendations 暗示问题需要 both preventive and remedial measures。言外之意是:仅仅 preventing divorce 不够,因为有些 divorces 已经 occurred 或 inevitable,那些 divorced ill women 需要 separate support system。这揭示了 policy challenge 的 full scope——既要 strengthen marriages,又要 protect vulnerable divorcées。对文章主旨而言,它是 most concrete policy prescription,将 theoretical finding 转化为 actionable agenda。它强调了 problem 的 urgency 和 complexity,呼吁 comprehensive response 而非 superficial intervention,最终 reinforce 了文章的 core message:这是 serious social issue requiring systemic policy attention。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度：积极支持

结论先行：本文作者态度为积极支持（ Concerned and advocating for policy change）。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇转折突出意外 P1

    在 news reports 新闻报道中,opening sentence 开篇句往往 reveal 揭示作者的 initial stance 初始立场。这篇文章用 'But' 转折引出 'risk of divorce rises when wife becomes ill' 的 unexpected finding 意外发现,这种 presentation 呈现方式暗示作者认为这是个 problem 问题而非 neutral fact 中性事实。

  2. 引用聚焦脆弱与困境 P2 P5

    作者两次 directly quote 直接引用 researcher Karraker 的话,且引用内容都强调 'struggling', 'stress', 'doubly vulnerable' 这类 emotionally charged 情感色彩强烈的 expressions 表达。这种 selective quotation 选择性引用显示作者想让 readers 读者感受到这个 issue 议题的 severity 严重性。

  3. 归因指向结构性问题 P6

    在 第6段 中,作者通过 Karraker 的 explanation 解释指出 'gender norms' 性别规范和 'imbalance in marriage markets' 婚姻市场失衡作为 underlying reasons 深层原因。这种 structural analysis 结构性分析将问题归因于 systemic issues 系统性问题而非 individual choices 个人选择,暗示作者认为这需要 societal-level intervention 社会层面干预。

  4. 结尾明确政策呼吁 P7 P8

    第7段 和 第8段 明确提出 'policymakers should be aware' 政策制定者应当意识到,以及 'offering support services' 提供支持服务等 concrete suggestions 具体建议。这种从 research findings 研究发现到 policy prescriptions 政策处方的 progression 推进是 solution-oriented journalism 解决方案导向新闻的典型特征,清晰表明作者不仅 report 报道问题,更 advocate for change 倡导变革。

  5. 问题到方案全链条 P1 P2 P5 P6 P7 P8

    这个 four-part progression 四部分推进(问题呈现→影响放大→原因剖析→解决方案)是 advocacy journalism 倡导新闻的 standard formula 标准公式。作者没有停留在 'what happened' 发生了什么,而是回答了 'why it matters' 为什么重要和 'what should be done' 应该做什么,这明确显示出 change-oriented intention 变革导向意图。

文中的态度信号词

  • But P1

    这个 adversative conjunction 转折连词在 opening sentence 开篇句中 create contrast 制造对比,将 traditional expectation 传统期待('stay together in sickness')与 troubling reality 令人不安的现实('risk of divorce when wife is ill')并置。这种 contrastive framing 对比框架立即 signal 发信号说这是个 problematic phenomenon 有问题的现象,而非 neutral observation 中性观察。

    同类词 However Yet Nevertheless Surprisingly Unexpectedly

  • struggling P2

    这个 gerund 动名词 'struggling' 描绘出 married women 已婚女性在 illness 疾病和 divorce 离婚之间的 difficult position 困境。相比 neutral terms 中性术语如 'dealing with' 或 'facing',它带有更强的 negative connotation 负面含义和 emotional weight 情感分量,暗示这是 unjust situation 不公正情况。

    同类词 stress vulnerable burden hardship suffering

  • doubly vulnerable P5

    这个 adverb-adjective combination 副词-形容词组合 'doubly vulnerable' 通过 quantifier 数量词 'doubly' 和 vulnerability term 脆弱性术语的结合,强调 women 女性面临的是 compounded disadvantage 复合劣势。这种 intensified language 强化语言传达出作者认为 current situation 当前情况是 inequitable 不公平的。

    同类词 particularly at risk especially susceptible disproportionately affected unfairly disadvantaged multiply burdened

  • Gender norms P6

    这个 compound noun 复合名词 'gender norms' 将问题 frame 框定为 social-structural issue 社会结构议题而非 individual behavior 个人行为。通过指出 'norms' 规范和 'expectations' 期待,作者 implicitly critique 隐含批判了 constraining social systems 限制性社会系统,暗示需要 systemic change 系统性变革。

    同类词 gender norms social expectations structural barriers systemic inequality institutional bias

  • should be aware P7

    这个 modal verb phrase 情态动词短语 'should be aware' 直接向 policymakers 政策制定者发出 directive 指令,从 descriptive mode 描述模式转向 prescriptive mode 规定模式。'Should' 的使用表明作者认为 current state 当前状态是 insufficient 不充分的,需要 action 行动。

    同类词 need to recognize must acknowledge ought to consider have a responsibility to it's essential that

  • prevent P8

    动词 'prevent' 出现在 policy recommendation 政策建议中,表明作者不仅 identify problem 识别问题,更 propose intervention 提出干预。这个 action-oriented verb 行动导向动词配合 'support services' 支持服务等具体措施,构建了完整的 solution framework 解决方案框架。

    同类词 reduce address tackle mitigate alleviate

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇新闻报道

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例，可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇新闻报道？

  1. 首段直陈研究发现 P1

    News reports 会在 lead paragraph 里直接给出 newsworthy information，而 argumentative essays 通常会先提出 a debatable opinion 或 thesis statement，explanatory texts 则会先给出 background context 或 definition。这篇文章一上来就是 a new study finds，明确是在 reporting a research result，而不是 arguing a viewpoint 或 explaining a concept。

  2. 频繁引用研究者 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    News reports 必须 cite sources 来 establish credibility，所以会出现 named researchers、quoted statements、statistical evidence。Argumentative essays 可能会 reference studies 但主要是为了 support their argument，而 explanatory texts 更倾向于 general descriptions 而不是 citing specific studies with names and numbers。这篇文章的核心就是 reporting what researchers found，而不是 using research to prove a point。

  3. 倒金字塔结构 P1 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

    Argumentative essays 会按照 logical reasoning 的顺序来 build up to a conclusion，通常是 introduction-body paragraphs with arguments-conclusion 的 structure。Explanatory texts 会按照 conceptual categories 或 chronological order 来 organize information。而这篇文章是典型的 most important first，然后逐渐展开 context 和 implications，这是 journalism 的 writing convention。

  4. 客观中立叙述 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

    Argumentative essays 的 author 会明确 advocate for a position，用 persuasive language 来 influence readers。Explanatory texts 虽然也相对 neutral，但 focus 是 making concepts clear 而不是 reporting events。这篇文章的 neutrality 体现在它只是 conveying research findings，即使在 第7段-8 讨论 policy implications 时，也是 reporting what Karraker believes，而不是 author's own recommendation。

  5. 四维快速识别法 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

    这个 integrated approach 之所以有效，是因为它抓住了 news reports 的 genre-defining characteristics：timely information delivery (开门见山)、source credibility (引用溯源)、reader-first organization (重要信息前置)、objectivity (作者隐身)。Argumentative essays 和 explanatory texts 虽然可能 share 某一两个特征，但不会 simultaneously exhibit 所有四个，这就是为什么 multiple checkpoints 能快速 narrow down 文体判断。

哪些词暴露了新闻报道体裁？

  • a new study finds P1 研究发现引用词 said researcher Amelia Karraker Karraker said Karraker offers Karraker believes she said
  • since 1992 P3 时间定位词 At the time of the first interview over the period studied over time at older ages
  • analyzed 20 years of data on 2,717 marriages P3 研究方法与数据词 from a study conducted by Indiana University The researchers examined They found that the study didn't assess
  • Indiana University P3 机构来源词 researcher Amelia Karraker co-author Kenzie Latham
  • They found that P4 研究结果陈述词 We found that The researchers examined the study didn't assess
  • 31% of marriages ended in divorce P4 核心数据统计词 2,717 marriages 20 years of data over the age of 50 four serious physical illnesses
  • offers a few possible reasons P6 分析推测引导词 may make it more difficult may find themselves may be health-related may need additional care
  • Given the increasing concern P7 政策影响引申词 policymakers should be aware Offering support services may reduce marital stress may need additional care
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

16 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》 的常见问题

2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章 Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce 的原文出自哪里？
2019年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part III Section C (1) 文章 Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce 选自2014年4 月28日发表在www. news.umich.edu“(密歇根大学官网)上的一篇标题为“Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce” (《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》)的文章。
2019年6月英语四级真题第1套文章《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》的主旨是什么？
一项研究揭示,当妻子患重病时,老年夫妻离婚的可能性更高,而丈夫患病时则不然。研究人员认为性别护理规范和再婚前景不平等导致了这种差异,并敦促政策制定者提供支持服务。（英文表述：A study reveals that older marriages are more likely to end in divorce when wives become seriously ill, compared to when husbands fall ill. Researchers suggest gender caregiving norms and unequal remarriage prospects contribute to this disparity, urging policymakers to provide support services.）
Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce（2019年6月英语四级真题第1套文章）是什么体裁？难度如何？
体裁为新闻报道，作者立场是积极支持（Concerned and advocating for policy change）。CEFR 难度 C1，全文 341 词、8 段；在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中，C1 级共 163 篇（占 32%）。
2019年6月英语四级真题第1套文章《直到疾病把我们分开:疾病如何影响离婚的风险》的篇章结构是怎样的？
全文 8 段按新闻报道骨架分为 6 个意群：第1段——研究发现：妻子患病导致离婚率上升；第2段——研究者解读：患病女性面临双重压力；第3段、第4段——研究方法：20年数据追踪；第5段——研究结论：女性的双重脆弱性；第6段——原因分析：性别规范与婚姻市场；第7段、第8段——政策建议：支持服务的必要性。
Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce 一文的作者态度是什么？
作者态度是积极支持（Concerned and advocating for policy change）。判断路径：开篇转折突出意外 → 引用聚焦脆弱与困境 → 归因指向结构性问题 → 结尾明确政策呼吁 → 问题到方案全链条；文中的态度信号词包括 But（第1段）、struggling（第2段）、doubly vulnerable（第5段）、Gender norms（第6段）、should be aware（第7段）、prevent（第8段）。
2019年6月英语四级真题第1套文章 Til sickness do us part： How illness affects the risk of divorce 中有哪些值得积累的生词？
按文中出现顺序共 6 个：vow（誓言；郑重承诺）、diagnose（诊断；确诊）、assess（评估；评价）、spouse（配偶）、incidence（发生率）、vulnerable（脆弱的；易受伤害的），每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新：