2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part Ⅲ Section C (1) Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma
CET-4 · 来自 2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 · Part Ⅲ Section C (1) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma

2026年6月英语四级真题第1套文章逐层精读

本文节选自网站Business Insider于2018年1月发布的一篇题为"Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma"的文章。

本页是 2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part Ⅲ Section C (1) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 347 词、12 段,CEFR 难度 B2(B2 级在英语四级文章中占 46%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语四级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

12 段英文原文

以下为2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part Ⅲ Section C (1) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 12 段。左侧 P1–P12 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma

Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma. On the one hand, your family dinner table deserves only the best. On the other hand, your wallet can only stretch so far.

Whether or not to buy organic is a personal decision, said Mike von Massow, professor of Food Agriculture.

Science won't give a clear-cut answer to the question of whether organic food is "better". There are often trade-offs(权衡) and answers become less definitive depending on the product under consideration.

One thing is definitive: Organic and conventionally grown food are equally nutritious. From a nutrition point of view, there is no difference between organic and traditionally grown products.

Organic products don't necessarily have fewer pesticides(杀虫剂)—in fact, they may have more. There is also no big difference between organic and non-organic products from a food-safety perspective. Even organic growers use pesticides. Testing shows little if any pesticide remains on conventionally grown products.

In fact, organic farmers often use larger quantities of pesticide because they can only use the natural variety of insect-killers. Chemical pesticides generally kill a much wider range of pests(害虫) than any single natural pesticide.

The use of animal waste in organic agriculture can also be a factor in the spread of bacteria like E. coli and salmonella. Over the past 10 years, Canada has seen more food-safety recalls for organic products, proportionally, than for conventional products.

On the whole, organic agriculture may have a smaller environmental footprint. That's mostly because the risk of groundwater contamination from organic farming is lower. Organic farmers never use neonics, the controversial pesticides that have been linked to shrinking bee populations worldwide.

Traditional agriculture has been making "dramatic improvements" to reduce its impact on the environment.

It isn't a black-and-white picture, though.

Organic farming is much less efficient when it comes to land use, although yields vary considerably depending on the crop.

On the other hand, advocates of organic farming argue yields and efficiency could be significantly improved if the food industry devoted as much research and money to organic farming as it does conventional agriculture.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

12 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Organic Food Dilemma

    Organic food presents a quality-versus-cost dilemma.

    本段承担 introduction 的功能,把抽象的 organic food debate 转化为日常消费选择。它为全文的核心论点奠基:是否购买有机食品不能只看一种标准,而要衡量多个 trade-offs。

    抓住两难对立
  2. P2

    A Personal Choice

    The decision to buy organic is personal.

    本段从首段的 dilemma 过渡到作者的总体态度,即选择应由个人权衡。它与全文主旨中的 personal priorities 相呼应,也为后文分别讨论营养、安全、环境和效率提供了逻辑入口。

    锁定专家结论
  3. P3

    No Simple Scientific Answer

    Science does not provide a simple verdict on organic food.

    本段提出全文的论证原则:organic 是否 better 没有统一答案。后续各段正是通过 nutrition、pesticides、food safety、environment 和 land use 等维度来证明这一复杂性。

    识别否定限定
  4. P4

    No Nutritional Advantage

    Organic and conventional foods have equal nutritional value.

    本段是全文第一条实质论据,它削弱了 organic is better 的普遍假设。它支持文章主旨中 both are equally nutritious 的关键判断,并为后文安全与环境层面的比较打开空间。

    寻找重复结论
  5. P5

    Pesticides and Food Safety

    Organic food is not necessarily safer or lower in pesticide use.

    本段进一步论证有机食品并非必然 better,补充了安全维度上的反证。它也为下一段解释为何 organic farmers 可能使用更多 pesticide 埋下伏笔。

    合并同向证据
  6. P6

    Why Organic Farms May Use More Pesticides

    Natural pesticide limits can lead organic farmers to use more pesticides.

    本段增强了前段安全论证的说服力,因为它不仅给出 surprising fact,还说明其 mechanism。由此,文章避免把有机农业简单美化为完全无 pesticide 的生产方式。

    追溯因果链
  7. P7

    Bacterial Risks in Organic Farming

    Organic farming can involve bacterial contamination and food-safety risks.

    本段从另一种风险来源深化 food-safety discussion,强化了有机食品并不必然更安全的结论。它使全文的比较更全面,避免读者只把安全问题理解为 pesticide residue。

    统摄例证数据
  8. P8

    An Environmental Benefit

    Organic agriculture may cause less environmental harm.

    本段提供对有机农业有利的论据,使文章形成 balanced argument。它直接对应全文主旨中的 may reduce environmental harm,也说明最终选择必须权衡,而不能只依据营养或安全。

    保留语气限定
  9. P9

    Conventional Agriculture Is Improving

    Traditional agriculture is improving its environmental performance.

    本段对第八段构成 qualification,即使有机农业可能更环保,传统农业也在缩小差距。它进一步支撑全文不存在 clear-cut answer 的总论点。

    提取主谓评价
  10. P10

    A Complex Environmental Picture

    The environmental issue has no black-and-white answer.

    本段是一个关键转折枢纽,把环境优势的讨论导向其代价。它为第十一段的 land use inefficiency 作铺垫,并回扣第三段强调的 trade-offs。

    还原比喻逻辑
  11. P11

    The Land-Use Cost of Organic Farming

    Organic farming is generally less land-efficient.

    本段揭示有机农业的 environmental trade-off:虽然它可能减少污染,却可能需要更多土地。它使文章的环境分析更严谨,并直接服务于全文的 efficiency 权衡。

    区分主次让步
  12. P12

    The Potential for Organic Improvement

    Greater research and investment could improve organic farming efficiency.

    本段回应第十一段的效率批评,防止读者把当前 less efficient 误读为永久缺陷。作为收束段,它再次确认有机食品之争需要结合现状、发展潜力和个人 priorities 作综合权衡。

    抓住条件反驳
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

12 道逐段细节自检题

针对2026年6月英语四级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 classic grocery store dilemma organic food

    What is the classic grocery store dilemma mentioned in the passage?

    • A Organic food is always the best choice for dinner.
    • B Consumers cannot afford organic food at all.
    • C Whether organic food is worth paying more for.
    • D Grocery stores should lower all food prices.
    • E Organic food has no obvious advantages over conventional food.
    • F Families should never worry about their dinner table.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项准确 paraphrase 原文的核心问句,其中 worth paying more for 对应 worth the higher price,并完整保留了是否值得支付更高价格这一争议。

    独特短语直达核心问句 时间最紧张时,直接用 classic grocery store dilemma 定位 第1段,不逐句翻译,只识别其相邻 question 的语义结构。随后寻找对该问题作完整 paraphrase、且没有绝对化扩张的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 Mike von Massow personal decision

    What is Mike von Massow's view on buying organic food?

    • A It is a scientific issue.
    • B Consumers must always buy organic food.
    • C It depends largely on government policy.
    • D It is a personal decision.
    • E It should be decided by food experts.
    • F It is not worth discussing.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项直接对应被引述者关于是否购买有机食品的判断,保留 personal decision 这一核心限定,没有添加强制性或普遍性结论。

    扫人名核对观点性质 时间紧张时,用 Mike von Massow 直接定位 第2段,只读取该人名关联的 statement,再从选项中寻找保持相同态度强度和判断性质的正确项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 clear-cut answer trade-offs

    Why does science fail to give a clear-cut answer to whether organic food is better?

    • A Because scientists are not interested in organic food.
    • B Because research on organic food is forbidden.
    • C Because organic food is clearly better in every way.
    • D Because all products give the same answer.
    • E Because there are trade-offs and answers become less definitive depending on the product.
    • F Because consumers do not care about scientific results.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项完整保留了原文给出的两个关联信息:存在 trade-offs,且结论的明确程度取决于具体 product,因而准确回答 Why。

    结果定位后读取解释句 时间紧张时,用 clear-cut answer 定位 第3段,读取该结果之后承担解释功能的句子。随后选择能覆盖完整 causal chain、且保留条件限制的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 definitive nutrition

    What is definitive about the nutrition of organic and conventionally grown food?

    • A Organic food contains more vitamins than conventional food.
    • B Conventional food lacks essential nutrients.
    • C Organic food is less nutritious than conventional food.
    • D The nutritional value varies greatly between the two.
    • E Organic food is always healthier than conventional food.
    • F Organic and conventionally grown food are equally nutritious.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项直接对应 第4段 的明确比较结论,comparison objects、nutrition 维度和 equal relation 均与原文一致。

    双词定位比较结论 时间紧张时,用 definitive 与 nutrition 联合定位 第4段,直接读取 conclusion marker 后的比较句,再选择保持相同比较对象、维度和关系的正确项。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 pesticides fewer

    What does the passage say about pesticides in organic products?

    • A Organic products may not have fewer pesticides and may even have more.
    • B Organic products contain no pesticides at all.
    • C Conventional products always have too many pesticide residues.
    • D Organic farmers never use pesticides.
    • E Organic products are always safer from a food-safety perspective.
    • F Testing shows no pesticide remains on organic products.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项准确保留了原文的 comparison 和 hedge:并非必然更少,而且存在更多的可能性,没有将可能判断改写成绝对事实。

    比较词定位并核对限定语气 时间紧张时,用 pesticides 与 fewer 联合定位 第5段 的第一句,只核对否定范围、比较方向和 modal strength,再选择完整保留这些要素的正确项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 larger quantities of pesticide chemical pesticides

    Why do organic farmers often use larger quantities of pesticide?

    • A Because chemical pesticides are too expensive for organic farmers.
    • B Because natural pesticides kill a much narrower range of pests than chemical pesticides.
    • C Because organic crops attract a larger number of pests.
    • D Because organic farmers are not allowed to use any pesticides.
    • E Because natural pesticides are stronger than chemical ones.
    • F Because organic farmers prefer to use large amounts of chemicals.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    原文说 chemical pesticides 的作用范围更广;该项将同一关系从 natural pesticides 的角度改写为 narrower range,比较对象和逻辑方向均正确。

    结果短语直达因果比较 时间紧张时,用 larger quantities of pesticide 直接定位 第6段,读取其 causal clause 和随后 comparison,只做关系映射,不逐词翻译;能够保持同一比较方向的即为正确项。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 bacteria animal waste

    What may be a factor in the spread of bacteria in organic agriculture?

    • A The use of chemical fertilizers.
    • B The use of neonics.
    • C The use of animal waste.
    • D The lack of food-safety recalls.
    • E The smaller environmental footprint.
    • F The use of plastic packaging.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项直接提取来源句中与 spread of bacteria 构成 factor 关系的主语,内容、对象与可能性关系均符合原文。

    结果词定位后抓因果主语 时间紧张时,以 bacteria 定位 第7段,直接分析包含 factor 的句法结构,寻找承担 cause role 的成分,再在选项中选择与该成分对应的正确项。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 environmental footprint groundwater contamination

    Why may organic agriculture have a smaller environmental footprint?

    • A Because organic farming uses much more land.
    • B Because organic farming produces higher yields.
    • C Because organic farming uses no pesticides at all.
    • D Because the risk of groundwater contamination is lower and organic farmers never use neonics.
    • E Because organic farming produces no waste.
    • F Because conventional farming uses no water.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项整合了 第8段 的两项相关环境信息:较低的 groundwater contamination risk,以及不使用与蜜蜂数量下降有关的 neonics,能够解释较小的 environmental footprint。

    结果短语定位并整合环境机制 时间紧张时,以 environmental footprint 定位 第8段,读取直接 explanation 及同段紧随的环境信息,再选择能够保持机制、对象和范围一致的正确项。

  9. 第 9 段 定位词 traditional agriculture dramatic improvements

    What has traditional agriculture been doing to reduce its impact on the environment?

    • A It has been switching to organic farming methods.
    • B It has been banning all pesticides.
    • C It has been increasing its environmental impact.
    • D It has been ignoring environmental problems.
    • E It has been making dramatic improvements.
    • F It has been reducing food production.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项直接对应 第9段 中 traditional agriculture 的持续动作,并保持 making improvements 的正向趋势。

    主体直定位谓语动作 时间紧张时,以 traditional agriculture 定位 第9段,直接提取该主体的 predicate,不扩展推测具体措施;与谓语动作和时态一致的即为正确项。

  10. 第 10 段 定位词 black-and-white picture

    What does the author imply by saying it is not a black-and-white picture?

    • A Organic farming is always better than conventional farming.
    • B Conventional farming is always better than organic farming.
    • C There are no environmental problems in agriculture.
    • D Color is the main factor in farming methods.
    • E Organic and conventional farming are exactly the same.
    • F The comparison between organic and conventional farming is complex.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    not a black-and-white picture 否定简单的二元判断;结合上下文,该项以 complex 准确概括有机农业与传统农业比较并非一方绝对占优。

    比喻还原为非二元判断 时间紧张时,用 black-and-white picture 直接定位 第10段,把该 idiom 还原为对二元判断的否定,再选择与这种 discourse function 一致的正确项。

  11. 第 11 段 定位词 land use efficient

    What does the passage say about organic farming in terms of land use?

    • A Organic farming is much less efficient when it comes to land use, although yields vary depending on the crop.
    • B Organic farming is more efficient in land use than conventional farming.
    • C Organic farming does not require any land.
    • D Organic farming always produces lower yields.
    • E Organic farming always produces higher yields.
    • F Land use efficiency is the same for organic and conventional farming.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项准确保留了 第11段 的 main claim 和 qualification:土地利用效率较低,同时产量会因 crop 不同而变化。

    方面定位后分离主张与让步 时间紧张时,以 land use 定位 第11段,先读取 main clause 的评价方向,再检查让步部分是否限制 yield 判断;同时保留两层信息的即为正确项。

  12. 第 12 段 定位词 advocates research and money

    What do advocates of organic farming argue?

    • A Organic farming should be abandoned immediately.
    • B Yields and efficiency could be significantly improved if more research and money were devoted to organic farming.
    • C Conventional agriculture receives too much research and money.
    • D Organic farming is already perfect in yields and efficiency.
    • E Research and money cannot improve organic farming.
    • F Money should be given only to conventional agriculture.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项准确概括支持者的 conditional claim:增加对 organic farming 的 research and money 投入,可能显著改善 yields and efficiency,并保留 could 与 if 的条件语气。

    立场词定位条件性主张 时间紧张时,用 advocates 定位 第12段,只提取 argue 后 proposition 的 subject、modal 和 condition;三者逻辑一致且不改变立场的即为正确项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 购买有机食品的两难处境

    第1段 以 grocery store dilemma 引出是否购买有机食品的问题,并呈现家庭健康需求与经济承受能力之间的 tension。第2段—第3段 随后指出这是 personal decision,且 science cannot provide a clear-cut answer,从而限定讨论范围。

    这一引言没有直接给出 final answer,而是通过 higher price、family dinner table 和 wallet 等具体表达制造阅读悬念。它还用 personal decision 与 trade-offs 说明 organic food 不能被简单判断为 better,为后文比较营养、安全、环境和效率等因素奠定框架。

    提出有机食品是否更值得购买的问题
  2. 营养与食品安全并不支持有机食品更优

    第4段 先给出 definitive claim,说明 organic and conventional food are equally nutritious。第5段—第7段 继续从 pesticide use、food safety、animal waste 和 bacterial contamination 等方面展开,指出有机食品不一定 pesticide-free,甚至可能存在更多相关风险。

    这一分论点直接支撑 organic food is not necessarily better。作者先处理消费者最关心的 nutrition,再讨论 pesticide 和 food-safety,借助 equally nutritious、little if any pesticide remains 以及 recalls 等信息,说明 higher price 并不能自动换来更高营养或更高安全性。

    有机食品与传统食品营养相当且并非更安全
  3. 环境收益与土地效率之间的权衡

    第8段 认为 organic agriculture may have a smaller environmental footprint,尤其体现在较低的 groundwater contamination risk 和不使用 neonics。第9段 指出 traditional agriculture 也在 reducing its environmental impact。第10段—第12段 进一步说明问题 is not black-and-white:有机农业土地利用效率较低,但其 advocates 认为更多 research and money 可能改善 yields and efficiency。

    这一分论点补充了有机食品可能具有的 environmental benefit,使文章避免片面否定 organic farming。同时,关于 land use、yields 和 conventional improvements 的讨论表明环保优势伴随 efficiency trade-off,因此最终选择必须综合 environmental harm、生产效率与个人 priorities。

    有机农业可能更环保但土地效率较低
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语四级文章。

  1. 首段设问锁定争议 P1 P2 P3

    议论文的 lead-in 常通过问句引出争议,而后续的 personal decision 与 no clear-cut answer 能帮助读者快速确认讨论焦点和基本立场。

  2. 中段证据破解优势预设 P4 P5 P6 P7

    文章通过 equal nutrition、并非更少的 pesticides 以及 food-safety concerns,说明 organic food 并不具有全面且确定的优势。

  3. 后段转折辨析利弊 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

    议论文的 complex reality 常体现在转折和让步之后,这些内容提示读者 organic farming 同时具有环境优势与效率局限。

  4. 本文的 core thesis 不是断言某一类食品绝对更好,而是说明是否购买 organic food 属于需要结合多项因素和 personal priorities 的选择。

主旨信号词 trade-offs P3 definitive P4 don't necessarily P5 In fact P6 On the whole P8 isn't a black-and-white picture P10

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

有机食品并不一定比传统种植的食品更好:两者营养价值相同,而有机农业既存在农药和食品安全风险,也可能减少环境危害。因此,是否选择有机食品需要权衡其环境效益、生产效率、安全性和个人需求。
Organic food is not necessarily better than conventionally grown food: both are equally nutritious, while organic farming involves pesticide and food-safety risks but may reduce environmental harm. Therefore, choosing organic food requires weighing its environmental benefits, efficiency, safety, and personal priorities.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语四级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • dilemma 进退两难的困境,两难选择

    结合 第1段 中钱包 wallet 与最佳品质 the best 的矛盾对立,再叠加构词法中 di- 表示 two 的含义,我们可以清晰地判定 dilemma 指的是一种面临双重抉择的 difficult choice。

    信号词对比与词根双重印证法
  • definitive 明确的,确切的,结论性的

    通过 第3段 中与 clear-cut 的同义对比,结合 第4段 冒号对明确 fact 的具体阐述,再加上动词 define 的派生关系,可以准确推断出 definitive 意为确定的、结论性的 definition。

    同义替换与标点解构推断法
  • yield 产量,产出

    综合 第11段 中关于 land use 和农作物 crop 的讨论,以及 第12段 中与生产效率 efficiency 并列出现的上下文 context,可以得出 yields 表示农业中的 crop production。

    领域主题联想与并列结构推断法
  • controversial 有争议的,引发争论的

    根据定语从句中提及的严重后果 shrinking bee populations 所带来的舆论影响,结合前缀 contro- 表达的反向 opposition 含义,推导出 controversial 描述的是具有极高争议的 issue。

    定语从句因果反推与词根解析法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 引用论证

    P2

    作者在 第2段 中引用了 Food Agriculture 领域的 professor Mike von Massow 的观点,表明购买 organic food 实际上是一个 personal decision。这种 引用论证(appeal to authority)为文章注入了权威的 professional insights,使论述摆脱了简单的 pure subjective speculation。这有力地支撑了主旨中关于 choosing organic food 需要结合 personal priorities 进行理性权衡的观点。

    信号词 said according to argued stated pointed out

    仿写: 当你想要增加文章的 convincing power 时,不妨设问:是否有权威的 expert or research 可以为我的 core argument 背书?在写作时,先呈现观点,随后引用专家的 high-value statements 予以强化。仿写模板为:As noted by [Expert Name], a professor of [Field], [Core View Point], which demonstrates that [Key Conclusion].

  • 对比论证

    P1 P12

    作者在 第1段 中运用了 On the one hand 与 On the other hand,将 family dinner table 追求最高品质的需求与 personal wallet 的经济约束进行鲜明对比。这种 对比论证(contrastive argument)精准地勾勒出消费者在 grocery store 中面临的 real dilemma。它直击主旨核心,即购买 organic food 并非单纯的单向选择,而是需要综合考量 budget 与 quality 的复杂 trade-off。

    信号词 On the one hand On the other hand in contrast while whereas however

    仿写: 在论述复杂议题时,可以自我启发:我能否通过摆出 two sides of a coin,来展示思维的 analytical depth?写作时建议使用对称的 sentence structures,依次列出正反或左右两方面的 key points。仿写模板为:On the one hand, [Pros/Perspective A]; on the other hand, [Cons/Perspective B], forcing consumers to make a balanced choice.

  • 因果论证

    P6 P8

    作者在 第6段 和 第8段 中,分别使用 because 与 That's mostly because 解释了有机农夫使用更大剂量 natural pesticides 的原因,以及 organic farming 具有更小 environmental footprint 的内在逻辑。这种 因果论证(causal reasoning)深层剖析了现象背后的 underlying causes,避免了结论的 arbitrary claim。它完美呼应了主旨,使读者清晰理解为何 organic food 在 safety 与 environment 维度会展现出不同的 trade-offs。

    信号词 because due to as a result linked to factor in lead to

    仿写: 写作时可进行启发式提问:这个 phenomenon 发生背后的 root cause 是什么?建议在给出特定 fact 或 point 之后,迅速使用因果引导词展开逻辑推理(logical deduction)。仿写模板为:[Phenomenon Statement], largely because [Underlying Reason], which ultimately leads to [Further Result].

  • 举例论证

    P7

    作者在 第7段 中通过表达 like E. coli and salmonella 以及列举 Canada 在 past 10 years 的具体数据,展示了 organic products 的 food-safety recalls 风险。这种 举例论证(exemplification)用具体真实的 concrete cases 替代了抽象的理论推演。这向读者证明了 organic agriculture 同样存在风险,极大地增强了主旨中关于 food-safety risks 的实证说服力。

    信号词 like for example for instance such as take ... as an example

    仿写: 写作时试着提示自己:我能给出哪个 specific instance 或 actual case 来支撑这个通用观点?建议在提出通用论点(general claim)后,立即接上极具代表性的 concrete examples 进行例证。仿写模板为:[General Claim], as evidenced by specific cases like [Concrete Example], which highlights the hidden risks.

  • 比喻修辞

    P8 P10

    作者在 第8段 使用 environmental footprint 比喻对环境的影响,在 第10段 使用 black-and-white picture 比喻非黑即白、绝对化的思维方式。这种 比喻修辞(metaphorical language)赋予了原本生硬的 academic debate 以鲜活的 visual image。它帮助读者直观理解有机农业与传统农业之间绝不是简单的好坏二分(not a black-and-white picture),完全契合主旨中需要全面权衡的观点。

    信号词 black-and-white picture environmental footprint wallet stretch

    仿写: 在修辞表达时思考:我能否借用一个常人生动熟悉的 image,来形象化说明复杂的 theoretical point?写作中可以选取大家熟知的 visual metaphors,将其自然融入到针对抽象概念的 commentary 中。仿写模板为:Understanding [Complex Issue] is not a simple black-and-white picture; rather, it is a nuanced journey full of trade-offs.

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

8 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 消费者的心理挣扎与高昂溢价的不匹配

    P1
    On the one hand, your family dinner table deserves only the best. On the other hand, your wallet can only stretch so far.

    对比与冲突类 On the one hand... On the other hand... while whereas in contrast conversely

    作者藉由 family care 与 limited budget 的冲突,隐晦地提示读者 organic food 的 premium price 已经制造了 emotional burden,预示着其 high price 可能难以被 rational choice 轻易接受。

  • 盲目追捧有机食品缺乏科学依据

    P3
    Science won't give a clear-cut answer to the question of whether organic food is "better".

    模糊限制语与客观中立类 won't give a clear-cut answer less definitive it depends not necessarily remain inconclusive

    暗示 consumers 企图通过 purchase organic 来获取 absolute health guarantee 是一种过分简化的 fantasy,scientific reality 要远比商业宣传 complex。

  • 有机食品的营养神话被彻底击碎

    P4
    One thing is definitive: Organic and conventionally grown food are equally nutritious.

    强强调与事实澄清类 One thing is definitive clearly undeniably the fact remains without doubt

    直接揭露了市场上关于 organic food 更具 nutritional value 的营销口号缺乏科学依据,指出消费者多花钱并不能买到更高 level 的营养。

  • 有机不等于无农药与绝对安全

    P5
    Organic products don't necessarily have fewer pesticides—in fact, they may have more.

    事实转折与反常识澄清类 in fact actually as a matter of fact the reality is contrary to popular belief

    打破了公众将 organic 与 100% pesticide-free 划等号的固执误区,点明购买有机食品并不能真正逃避 pesticide exposure 的客观事实。

  • 有机农业天然属性背后的食品安全隐患

    P7
    Over the past 10 years, Canada has seen more food-safety recalls for organic products, proportionally, than for conventional products.

    数据对比与风险揭示类 proportionally statistically higher rate of disproportionately in terms of percentage

    揭示了 organic farming 对 natural fertilizer 的依赖反而带来了更高的 biological contamination 风险,反驳了有机食品更安全的直觉印象。

  • 有机食品的核心价值在于生态保护而非个人收益

    P8
    On the whole, organic agriculture may have a smaller environmental footprint.

    让步限定类 On the whole... may On the whole may to some extent admittedly in terms of

    明确指出 organic food 的真正 value 不在于 personal health 或 nutrition,而在于 broader societal value 即 environmental protection。

  • 极化思维无法评价复杂的农业议题

    P10
    It isn't a black-and-white picture, though.

    转折与非黑即白批判类 isn't a black-and-white picture, though isn't a black-and-white picture far from simple more complex than not a binary choice shades of gray

    警告读者不要陷入 organic is good, conventional is bad 的简单二分法,为下文引出 land-use efficiency 等复杂 trade-offs 铺平道路。

  • 有机农业的低效并非固有缺陷而是投资失衡的结果

    P12
    advocates of organic farming argue yields and efficiency could be significantly improved if the food industry devoted as much research and money to organic farming as it does conventional agriculture.

    假设条件与立场辩护类 could be... if... could be... if would increase provided that might improve given should... were it not for

    暗示当前 organic farming 的 yield deficiency 并非技术上的 dead end,而是历史资源倾斜造成的不公结果,呼吁理性看待其 future potential。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( Objective and balanced)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 锁定开篇提问与两难困境 P1 P2 P3

    当作者在 text start 抛出两难问题且表示 personal decision 时,说明 author 并没有一上来就 choose a side,暗示了客观讨论的 tone。

  2. 对比多维证据的正反利弊 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9

    作者在指出 organic food 不一定比 conventional food 更安全的同时,也 acknowledge 了其在 lower groundwater contamination 上的优势,表现出 objective evaluation。

  3. 辨析非黑即白与总结归纳 P10 P11 P12

    结尾段落既指出了 organic farming 在 land use 上的 inefficiency,又提到了 advocates 的反驳观点,证明 author 在做整体综述时依旧 maintain a neutral stance。

文中的态度信号词

  • won't give a clear-cut answer P3

    该表达明确指出 science cannot provide a simple resolution,直接奠定了本文 neutral and unbiased 的基调。

    同类词 less definitive trade-offs personal decision

  • equally nutritious P4

    通过说明两类食品是 equally good/nutritious,用客观数据打破单方面的 bias,支持公平对比。

    同类词 no difference no big difference comparable

  • On the whole P8

    作为 summary transition,引导对 environmental footprint 的宏观评估,既承认优点又使用 qualifier 进行程度限定。

    同类词 by and large generally speaking mostly

  • isn't a black-and-white picture P10

    非常直接地提醒 reader 该议题并非 binary opposition,必须以 dialectical perspective 来对待。

    同类词 not all-or-nothing it depends nuanced

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语四级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 首段抓取提问与消费两难 P1

    新闻报道通常采用 factual lead 报导最新事件,说明文倾向于 objective explanation,而本文通过 rhetorical question 引入争议,表明全文旨在围绕 debatable subject 展开探讨,完全符合议论文的 typical feature。

  2. 捕捉中段转折与立场对抗 P3 P8 P10 P12

    说明文只会进行纯粹的 fact description,而新闻报道侧重于 event report;相反,本文通过呈现正反双方的 different perspectives 开展观点碰撞,具备极为鲜明的 argumentative structure。

  3. 文章既不是传播纯粹 scientific knowledge 的说明文,也不是发布 breaking news 的新闻报道,而是围绕 organic agriculture 展开层层深入的 evaluative discussion,完全符合议论文的 core structure。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • dilemma P1 议题困境与争议引导词 debate controversy issue dispute question
  • On the one hand ... On the other hand P1 二元对立与权衡对比词 On the one hand On the other hand conversely in contrast by contrast
  • trade-offs P3 辩证权衡与复杂评价词 less definitive compromise nuanced pros and cons relative
  • It isn't a black-and-white picture, though P10 立场转折与辩证总结词 It isn't a black-and-white picture though however nevertheless on the flip side
  • advocates ... argue P12 阵营立场与主张引导词 advocates argue critics proponents opponents
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

16 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 的常见问题

2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part Ⅲ Section C (1) 文章 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 的原文出自哪里?
2026年6月英语四级真题第1套 Part Ⅲ Section C (1) 文章 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 节选自网站Business Insider于2018年1月发布的一篇题为"Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma"的文章。
2026年6月英语四级真题第1套文章 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 的主旨是什么?
有机食品并不一定比传统种植的食品更好:两者营养价值相同,而有机农业既存在农药和食品安全风险,也可能减少环境危害。因此,是否选择有机食品需要权衡其环境效益、生产效率、安全性和个人需求。(英文表述:Organic food is not necessarily better than conventionally grown food: both are equally nutritious, while organic farming involves pesticide and food-safety risks but may reduce environmental harm. Therefore, choosing organic food requires weighing its environmental benefits, efficiency, safety, and personal priorities.)
Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma(2026年6月英语四级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是客观中立(Objective and balanced)。CEFR 难度 B2,全文 347 词、12 段;在英语四级全部 511 篇真题文章中,B2 级共 234 篇(占 46%)。
2026年6月英语四级真题第1套文章 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 12 段按议论文骨架分为 3 个意群:引言 · 第1段、第2段、第3段——购买有机食品的两难处境;分论点 · 第4段、第5段、第6段、第7段——营养与食品安全并不支持有机食品更优;分论点 · 第8段、第9段、第10段、第11段、第12段——环境收益与土地效率之间的权衡。
Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(Objective and balanced)。判断路径:锁定开篇提问与两难困境 → 对比多维证据的正反利弊 → 辨析非黑即白与总结归纳;文中的态度信号词包括 won't give a clear-cut answer(第3段)、equally nutritious(第4段)、On the whole(第8段)、isn't a black-and-white picture(第10段)。
2026年6月英语四级真题第1套文章 Is organic food worth the higher price? It's the classic grocery store dilemma 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:dilemma(进退两难的困境,两难选择)、definitive(明确的,确切的,结论性的)、yield(产量,产出)、controversial(有争议的,引发争论的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: