2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 · Part II Section C (2) · 听力

2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2)

说明文 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇说明文全文 404 词、8 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

8 段英文原文

以下为2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 的听力原文,共 8 段。左侧 P1–P8 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Now, believe it or not, people sometimes lie in order to maintain a good, honest reputation—even if it hurts them to do so. At least, this is what a team of scientists is suggesting, with evidence to prove it.

Picture this scenario: You often drive for work and can be compensated for up to 400 miles per month. Most people at your company drive about 300 miles each month. But this month, you drove 400 miles. How many miles do you think you'd claim in your expense report?

The scientists asked this exact question as part of the study we're discussing today. With surprising results, they found that 12% of respondents reported the distance they drove as less than the actual figure, giving an average answer of 384 miles. In other words, they lied about the number of miles, even though they would forfeit money they were owed.

The researchers believe this was to seem honest, with the assumption being that others would be suspicious of a high expense claim. But why would people fabricate numbers to their own detriment? The researchers explain that many people care a great deal about their reputation and how they'll be judged by others. If they care enough, their concern about appearing honest and not losing the respect of others may be greater than their desire to actually be honest.

The researchers assert that the findings suggest that when people obtain very favorable outcomes, they anticipate other people's suspicious reactions and prefer lying and appearing honest to telling the truth and appearing as selfish liars.

So why is this research important? Well, experts generally agree there are two main types of lie-selfish lies and lies that are meant to benefit others. The first, as you may predict, is for selfish gain, such as submitting a fraudulent claim to an insurance company, while the second involves lying to help others or not offend others, for example, telling a friend whose outfit you don't like that they look great.

But the researchers are suggesting a third type of lying—lying to maintain a good reputation. Now this hypothesis is new and some skeptics argue that this isn't a whole new category of lie.

But the findings seem intuitive to me. After all, one of the main motivations for lying is to increase our worth in the eyes of others. So it seems highly likely that people will lie to seem honest.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

8 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    A Surprising Claim

    People sometimes lie to maintain an honest reputation even at a cost, and scientists have evidence to support this.

    这段话是整个文章的introduction,它提出了一个surprising phenomenon,为后文的study和explanation奠定基础。它与文章主旨直接相关,因为定义了第三种lying的动机。

    提取文章开头的主旨声明
  2. P2

    The Mileage Dilemma

    A scenario is presented to illustrate the dilemma of whether to report actual mileage or a lower amount.

    这一段是文章中的transition,它将理论claim转化为具体的实验情境,让读者更容易理解experiment的trigger。它支持文章主旨,通过具体情景展示了人们可能撒谎的场合。

    识别场景设置的目的
  3. P3

    Surprising Study Results

    The study found that 12% of respondents lied about their mileage, underreporting it even at a financial cost.

    这一段提供了实验研究的具体结果,是supporting evidence. 它强化了文章主旨,因为数据显示了人们确实会牺牲利益来说谎,为后续解释第三种lie提供了事实基础。

    解读实验数据的关键结论
  4. P4

    Explaining the Motivation

    Researchers explain that people underreport to appear honest, as their concern for reputation outweighs their desire for actual honesty.

    这段话是文章的分析核心,它从data上升到theory,解释了为什么人们会做出牺牲利益的行为。它直接支撑了文章主旨:这是一种为维护reputation而进行的自我牺牲式撒谎。

    提取因果解释逻辑
  5. P5

    Anticipating Suspicion

    When people get favorable outcomes, they anticipate suspicion and prefer lying to appear honest rather than tell the truth and seem selfish.

    这段话进一步阐明了研究者的interpretation,解释了撒谎者如何权衡appearance和reality。它深化了文章主旨,强调了'anticipated suspicion'这一驱动因素,使第三种lie的机制更加清晰。

    提炼心理动机模式
  6. P6

    The Existing Two Types of Lies

    The research is important because experts currently classify lies into two types—selfish lies and lies meant to benefit others—which provides context for a possible third type.

    这段是文章中的contextual information,它解释了研究的重要性——可能挑战或拓展已有的分类。它服务于文章主旨,将第三种lie置于更大的理论框架中。

    概括既有分类体系
  7. P7

    A Controversial Third Type

    The researchers propose a third type of lying—lying to maintain a good reputation—although some skeptics doubt whether it is truly a new category.

    这段话是文章的转折点,它正式提出第三种lie的论点,并引入争议。它直接支撑文章主旨,因为主旨正是关于这种新类型的提出及其动机。

    区分主张与质疑
  8. P8

    An Intuitive Conclusion

    The author supports the hypothesis, finding it intuitive that people lie to appear honest as a way of increasing their worth in others' eyes.

    这段话作为conclusion,回应了开头的claim,并通过个人评价来增强观点的可接受性。它服务于文章主旨,表明作者同意这一新的lie类型,并为读者提供思考方向。

    捕捉作者态度表述
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

8 道逐段细节自检题

针对2020年12月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 scientists lie

    According to the scientists, what can motivate people to lie even when doing so hurts them?

    • A To gain monetary compensation.
    • B To help others.
    • C To maintain a good, honest reputation.
    • D To avoid punishment.
    • E To appear modest.
    • F To gain trust from authorities.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    原文明确写道“lie in order to maintain a good, honest reputation”,其中in order to直接引出行为目的。正确项完整保留了maintain、honest和reputation三个核心信息,也能解释题干所强调的即使行为会hurt them仍然撒谎的反常性。

    首段目的标志直取 时间最紧张时,用scientists与lie的组合直接定位第1段,再扫描purpose marker,如“in order to”。无需通读后续例证,只需把标志词后的目的短语与选项进行同义核对,选择信息边界完全一致的正确项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 compensated

    In the driving scenario, what is the maximum monthly distance for which one can be compensated?

    • A 300 miles.
    • B 384 miles.
    • C 500 miles.
    • D 400 miles.
    • E 200 miles.
    • F 100 miles.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    原文写明“can be compensated for up to 400 miles per month”,其中up to明确表示maximum。正确项对应的是报销上限,而不是多数人的通常驾驶量或研究结果中的平均申报量。

    上限结构取数 用compensated直接定位第2段,随后只扫描表示上限的短语,不处理场景中的其他叙述。将该短语控制的数字与选项机械匹配,即可确定正确项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 12% respondents

    What did 12% of the respondents do in the study?

    • A They claimed the maximum 400 miles.
    • B They reported an average of 384 miles.
    • C They drove exactly 300 miles.
    • D They refused to answer the question.
    • E They reported fewer miles than they actually drove.
    • F They asked for additional compensation.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    原文说这部分respondents“reported the distance they drove as less than the actual figure”。正确项将less than the actual figure同义改写为fewer miles than they actually drove,行为主体、比较方向和对象均保持一致。

    百分比后读取谓语 看到12%就直接跳到第3段,并忽略其他数字。锁定“12% of respondents”后,只读取它所对应的谓语与比较方向,再选择完成同义改写的正确项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 fabricate numbers their own detriment

    According to the researchers, why did some people fabricate numbers to their own detriment?

    • A They wanted to test the company's reimbursement policy.
    • B They simply forgot the exact distance.
    • C They considered financial gain unimportant.
    • D They wanted their claims to match their colleagues' mileage exactly.
    • E They made a calculation mistake in their report.
    • F They were more concerned about appearing honest and maintaining their reputation.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    原文说明人们非常在乎reputation及他人如何评价自己,而且“concern about appearing honest”可能超过“desire to actually be honest”。正确项保留了这种关注重点,并用maintaining their reputation概括了不愿失去他人尊重的心理。

    设问后读取直接解释 用fabricate numbers直接锁定第4段的问句,然后只读紧随其后的researchers explain结构。将解释中的核心心理比较与选项核对,选择保留该比较关系的正确项。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 very favorable outcomes researchers assert

    What did the researchers assert about people with very favorable outcomes?

    • A They anticipate suspicion and prefer lying to appear honest.
    • B They boast about their achievements openly.
    • C They become more generous with their compensation.
    • D They expect to be praised for their honesty.
    • E They tell the truth to avoid trouble.
    • F They ignore others' potential suspicious reactions.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    原文指出他们会“anticipate other people's suspicious reactions”,并“prefer lying and appearing honest to telling the truth”。正确项凝练了预期怀疑和行为取舍两个关键部分,没有改变原文的逻辑方向。

    条件后双谓语核对 用very favorable outcomes直接定位第5段,不必通读上下文。读取条件从句后的两个并列谓语,尤其核对preference structure,再选择完整保留这两个动作的正确项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 two main types of lies experts

    What are the two main types of lies according to experts?

    • A White lies and black lies.
    • B Selfish lies and lies meant to benefit others.
    • C Intentional and unintentional lies.
    • D Public and private lies.
    • E Selfish lies and lies to maintain a good reputation.
    • F Lies that harm oneself and lies that harm others.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    原文明确列出“selfish lies”和“lies that are meant to benefit others”两个类别。正确项仅将that are省略,类别数量、并列关系和动机标准均与原文一致。

    分类标志后提取并列项 用experts与two main types直接定位第6段,随后只读取分类标志后的两个并列名词短语,跳过examples。与这两个类别同时匹配的选项就是正确项。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 third type

    What third type of lying do the researchers propose?

    • A Lying to gain social status.
    • B Lying to avoid embarrassment.
    • C Lying to maintain a good reputation.
    • D Lying to make other people appear honest.
    • E Lying to protect oneself from harm.
    • F Lying to achieve personal goals.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    第7段直接使用破折号定义“a third type of lying—lying to maintain a good reputation”。正确项完整复现该定义,没有扩大动机范围或更换受益对象。

    序数定义短语直取 用third type直接定位第7段,看到定义标志后只提取其控制的短语,不向前读取旧分类,也不向后读取作者评价。与该定义边界完全一致的选项即为正确项。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 intuitive

    Why does the author find the findings intuitive?

    • A Because previous studies have confirmed these findings.
    • B Because people always tell the truth when outcomes are favorable.
    • C Because the data in the study was very convincing.
    • D Because one main motivation for lying is to increase our worth in the eyes of others.
    • E Because lying to seem honest is a common social strategy.
    • F Because people are always judged by their reputation.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    原文在作者评价后明确说明:“one of the main motivations for lying is to increase our worth in the eyes of others”。正确项保留了main motivation、increase our worth和in the eyes of others三个核心部分,直接回答作者为什么认为研究发现合乎直觉。

    态度词后追理由 用intuitive直接定位第8段,然后跳到紧随其后的reason marker,只读取其控制的理由句。选择完整复现该理由逻辑、且没有加入绝对化措辞的正确项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

8 个意群的说明文骨架

按说明文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引出现象

    这个 opening paragraph 直接 presents 一个 surprising phenomenon:人们有时会 lie 来 maintain 一个 good and honest reputation,即使这样做会 hurt themselves。作者用 'believe it or not' 来 create suspense,并强调有 scientific evidence 支持这个 counterintuitive 的 claim。

    这个 introductory section 的 function 是 hook the reader's attention 并 establish 文章要 explore 的 central paradox。它为后续的 detailed explanation 和 evidence 做好 preparation,让读者对这种 seemingly irrational behavior 产生 curiosity。

    点明研究发现的核心现象
  2. 情境设定与研究设计

    这个 section 通过一个 hypothetical scenario 来 operationalize 前面提到的 phenomenon。它 describes 一个 expense reporting situation,设定了 specific parameters(400 miles maximum,300 miles average),然后 poses a direct question 给 reader,让 reader 进入 research participants 的 perspective。

    这个 methodological segment 的 purpose 是 bridge abstract concept 和 concrete evidence。通过 presenting 一个 relatable scenario,它 helps readers understand 研究是如何 test 这个 hypothesis 的,同时 creates anticipation for the results。这是 expository writing 中 typical 的 context-building technique。

    构建验证假设的实验情境
  3. 研究发现

    这个 findings section reveals 实验的 surprising results:12% 的 respondents reported 更少的 mileage than actual,平均 claim 384 miles instead of 400。重点是这些 participants voluntarily forfeited money they were entitled to,这 directly demonstrates 前面提出的 paradoxical behavior。

    这个 evidence-presenting unit 的 critical role 是 substantiate 开头的 claim with concrete data。在 expository structure 中,这是从 hypothesis 到 proof 的 key transition。The numerical specificity(12%,384 miles)adds credibility,而 'even though they would forfeit money' 这个 emphasis 强化了 behavior 的 counterintuitive nature。

    提供核心现象的数据证据
  4. 结果解释与动机分析

    这个 interpretation section 深入 explain 为什么 participants 会 engage in this self-defeating behavior。Researchers attribute it to concern about reputation 和 anticipation of others' suspicion。关键 insight 是:people's desire to appear honest 可能 outweigh 他们 actually being honest 的 desire。这揭示了 reputation management 的 powerful psychological force。

    这个 analytical segment 的 function 是 transform raw findings into meaningful insight。它 answers the 'why' question that naturally arises from 前面的 surprising data。在 expository structure 中,这是从 description 到 analysis 的 crucial move,帮助 readers understand 不仅是 what happened,更重要的是 the underlying mechanism。

    揭示行为背后的心理机制
  5. 研究结论与行为模式总结

    这个 conclusion segment 将前面的 findings 和 interpretation distill into 一个 general principle:当 people obtain 非常 favorable outcomes 时,他们会 anticipate suspicious reactions,并 prefer lying to appear honest rather than telling truth and appearing selfish。这是对 research implications 的 concise formulation。

    这个 synthesizing unit 的 role 是 crystallize 前面的 analysis into 一个 clear behavioral pattern。在 expository structure 中,这是 moving from specific case study 到 generalizable finding 的 key step。它 reformulates 前面的 explanation in more abstract terms,making the insight applicable beyond 这个 specific expense reporting scenario。

    将发现提炼为普遍规律
  6. 研究意义与理论背景

    这个 contextualization section 通过 question 'why is this research important' 来 establish 研究的 broader significance。它 introduces existing framework of two types of lies(selfish lies 和 prosocial lies),providing necessary background for understanding 为什么 identifying a third type matters。这是 situating 新 discovery within existing knowledge 的 essential move。

    这个 framing unit 的 purpose 是 shift focus from 'what we found' 到 'why it matters'。它 provides theoretical context that helps readers appreciate 研究的 contribution。在 expository structure 中,这是 connecting specific findings 到 larger disciplinary conversations 的 important transition,为 next段提出 new category 做 preparation。

    建立研究的理论贡献背景
  7. 提出新理论分类与学术争议

    这个 theoretical contribution section formally proposes 第三种 lying type—lying to maintain good reputation。同时它也 acknowledges 这个 hypothesis 是 new 并 presents skeptical voices,indicating some argue this isn't truly a new category。这展示了 academic discourse 的 dialectical nature。

    这个 proposition unit 的 critical function 是 articulate 研究的 theoretical contribution。它 explicitly names 第三种 lying type,direct connection 到 article's main thesis。同时 mentioning skepticism adds credibility by showing awareness of potential objections。在 expository structure 中,这是 presenting novel contribution while acknowledging disciplinary context 的 balanced approach。

    提出新的理论分类及其争议
  8. 作者立场与论证总结

    这个 closing section 中作者 expresses personal stance,stating findings 'seem intuitive'。作者 provides final justification:since a main motivation for lying is to increase worth in others' eyes,it's 'highly likely' people will lie to seem honest。这是用 logical reasoning 来 support 前面提出的 third category。

    这个 concluding unit 的 function 是 bring closure by offering author's reasoned position。在 expository structure 中,after presenting evidence, interpretations, theoretical contribution, and skepticism,作者 finally weighs in。The logical argument(lying is about increasing worth → therefore likely to lie to seem honest)provides coherent ending that reinforces article's main thesis。

    作者的立场及逻辑论证
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 首段悖论现象 P1

    说明文的 opening paragraph 通常会用 surprising fact 或 counterintuitive observation 来引出 topic,这里 people lie to maintain honest reputation 就是这个 paradoxical behavior,immediately signals 文章的 core focus

  2. 实验数据支撑 P2 P3

    说明文尤其是 science-based exposition 会依赖 empirical evidence 来 support claims。第2-3段通过 scenario 和 study results 提供了 concrete evidence,这是文章 credibility 的来源,也是 main idea 的 supporting pillar

  3. 因果机制解释 P4 P5

    第4-5段使用 researchers believe, explain, assert 来 interpret findings,说明了 why people behave this way。说明文的 core purpose 往往不只是 describe phenomenon,而是 explain causation,所以 interpretation sections 最接近 main idea

  4. 新发现定位 P6 P7

    第6-7段通过 two main types 和 third type 的对比,explicitly position 这个 research finding 在 existing knowledge 中的 novelty。这种 situating move 是说明文 clarify main point 的常见手法,直接告诉读者 what's new

  5. 主旨不是某个 single sentence,而是 logical chain: phenomenon identification → evidence demonstration → mechanism explanation → theoretical contribution。这个 progression 是说明文的 standard architecture,尾段的 seem intuitive 和 highly likely 进一步 reinforce 这个 claim 的 plausibility

主旨信号词 lie in order to maintain P1 third type of lying P7 anticipate other people's suspicious reactions P5 researchers assert P5 So why is this research important P6

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

研究人员发现了第三种撒谎类型:人们有时会为了显得诚实和维护声誉而撒谎,即使这会让他们蒙受经济损失,因为他们预判到他人会怀疑过于有利的结果,因此更看重被认为诚实而非实际诚实。
Researchers have identified a third type of lying: people sometimes lie to appear honest and maintain their reputation, even when it costs them financially, because they anticipate others' suspicion of overly favorable outcomes and prioritize being perceived as honest over actual honesty.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • forfeit 放弃,丧失(权利、财产等)

    我们来把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,compensation scenario 告诉我们这是关于 money 的问题。然后,第3段 的 'In other words' 是个关键 signal,它把 'reported less' 和 'forfeit money they were owed' 建立了等价关系。这种 equivalence 表明 forfeit 是 giving up 的结果。再从 construction 角度,'for-' prefix 强化了'away'的意味。所以整个 logical chain 是:少报里程 → 主动放弃 → 失去应得报酬。

    交易场景中追踪因果链
  • detriment 损害,伤害,不利

    让我们 synthesize 这些线索。rhetorical question 'to their own detriment' 直接 points to 前面提到的 forfeiting money,这是第一层 connection。然后 第4段 的 explanation 揭示了 underlying trade-off:reputation 与 honesty 之间的 tension。'detriment' 在这个 framework 中是 sacrifice 或 cost 的体现。Morphologically,'de-' prefix 的 downward direction 也 confirms 了 negative meaning。所以 detriment 就是为了获得某种 benefit 而承受的 harm。

    修辞问句定位抽象名词
  • fraudulent 欺诈的,fraudulent的

    我们先看 macro structure:第6段 在建立 taxonomy of lies。Fraudulent claim 被放在 selfish lies 这个 category 下作为 exemplification。从 domain knowledge 来说,insurance claims 涉及 financial transactions,而 selfish gain 暗示 illegitimate methods。再看 micro level,'-ulent' suffix 表明这是 quality descriptor,修饰 claim 的 nature。所以整个 inference path 是:分类体系 → 例证定位 → 词性功能 → 负面属性。

    分类体系中定位术语
  • intuitive 直觉的,凭直觉得到的

    让我们整合这些 threads。首先,discourse structure 显示 第8段 是 author's personal take,与 skeptics 形成 contrast。'Seem intuitive' 后面的'After all'是 key connector,它引入的不是 rigorous proof,而是 common-sense reasoning。这种 reasoning pattern 表明 intuitive 指的是 something that aligns with natural expectation。Etymologically,'in-' + 'tuit' 指向 internal knowing,reinforcing 这种 immediate、non-analytical quality。所以 intuitive 描述的是无需 elaborate analysis 就能 grasp 的特质。

    认知类词看推理模式
  • compensate 补偿,赔偿,报酬

    我们来 trace 这个 economic transaction。第2段 建立了 basic framework:work-related driving 可以得到 compensation,这是 employer-employee 之间的 standard arrangement。第3段 通过 forfeiting money 的 consequence 反向 confirms compensate 涉及 monetary payment。从 etymology 角度,'com-' + 'pensare' 的'weigh together'含义 perfectly captures 这种 equivalence exchange:work(mileage)换取 payment。所以 compensate 的 core meaning 是提供 equivalent value 作为 return。

    交易动词找交换结构
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例子

    P2

    作者在 第2段 设计了一个 hypothetical scenario,让读者想象自己是经常 drive for work 的员工,公司 reimburse 最多 400 miles,但多数人只 claim 300 miles 左右。这个 concrete example 让抽象的 reputation-based lying 变得 tangible and relatable,帮助读者理解为什么有人会 underreport their actual mileage 来维护 honest reputation,即使这样做会让自己 lose money they deserve。

    信号词 for example for instance such as take... as an example consider this imagine suppose picture this let's say

    仿写: 当你需要 explain 一个 abstract concept 时,问自己:能否设计一个 everyday scenario 让读者 relate to?比如要说明 peer pressure 的影响,你可以描述:'Imagine you're at a restaurant,everyone orders expensive dishes,你本来想 order 便宜的 salad,但为了 fit in,你也点了 pricey steak。' 仿写模版:'Picture this: [设定具体场景] → [描述行为选择] → [引出关键问题]'。

  • 列数字

    P3

    第3段 中出现了 precise statistics:12% of respondents 和 average of 384 miles。这些 quantitative data 不仅 validate 了研究的 scientific rigor,更重要的是用 numerical evidence 证明确实有 significant portion of people 会 deliberately underreport 来 appear honest。这种 data-driven approach 让文章的 central claim 更具 credibility 和 persuasive power。

    信号词 percent average approximately nearly about roughly exactly precisely up to as many as rate of

    仿写: 当你想 strengthen your argument 时,考虑:能否用 statistics 或 measurements 来 quantify 你的观点?不要只说 'many people' 或 'often',而要说 '35% of participants' 或 'increased by 2.5 times'。仿写模版:'Research shows that [具体百分比/数字] of [群体] [行为], with [平均值/其他数据] indicating [结论]'。记住 numbers 要 serve your point,不是为了 show off data。

  • 下定义

    P6

    第6段 明确 define 了 two main types of lies:selfish lies 和 lies that benefit others,并为每种 type 提供了 clear characteristics 和 examples。这个 definition 为后续提出的 third type of lying 建立了 conceptual framework,让读者能够 understand 新类型的 lie 是如何 distinct from 传统分类的。这种 definitional approach 是 expository writing 中建立 clear categories 和 facilitate understanding 的关键。

    信号词 is defined as refers to means can be understood as is characterized by consists of types of categories of is classified into

    仿写: 当你需要 introduce 一个 complex concept 或 distinguish between similar ideas 时,使用 definition strategy。结构可以是:'[Concept] is defined as [核心特征] + [区分性特点]'。然后用 'for example' 或 'such as' 添加 concrete instances。比如:'Procrastination is the act of delaying tasks,characterized by voluntary postponement despite knowing negative consequences, such as putting off writing a paper until the night before。'

  • 分类别

    P6 P7

    整篇文章的 logical structure 建立在 categorization 之上:第6段 先列出 existing two types of lies,然后 第7段 introduce 第三种 type——lying to maintain reputation。这种 classification system 让 complex phenomenon of lying 变得 organized and comprehensible,同时 highlight 了研究的 novelty,即发现了一个 previously unrecognized category。这个 categorical framework 是全文 argument 的 backbone。

    信号词 types categories kinds sorts classes can be divided into falls into classified as first... second... third main groups

    仿写: 当你面对 complex topic with multiple dimensions 时,问自己:能否 divide it into distinct categories?建立 clear criteria for classification,然后 present each category systematically。模版:'[Topic] can be classified into [数字] main types/categories: First, [类别1 + 特征]; Second, [类别2 + 特征]; [可选] Recently, researchers have identified [新类别]'。确保每个 category 有 clear boundaries 且 mutually exclusive。

  • 作诠释

    P4 P5

    第4段 对 第3段 的 surprising finding 进行了 in-depth interpretation:解释了 why people would lie to their detriment,指出这是因为 people care deeply about reputation 和 how they're judged。作者进一步 clarify 说当 concern about appearing honest 超过 desire to be actually honest 时,这种 behavior 就会发生。这种 interpretive analysis 将 surface-level observation 转化为 deeper psychological insight,揭示了 underlying motivations。

    信号词 this suggests this means in other words this is because the reason is this indicates this implies what this shows the explanation is

    仿写: 在 present data 或 phenomenon 后,不要 stop at description,而要 dig deeper 问:Why does this happen? What does it mean? 使用 transitional phrases 如 'This suggests that', 'The reason is', 'This occurs because'。模版:'[现象/数据] → The researchers explain/believe that [内在原因] → This is because [深层机制]'。让你的 interpretation 建立 logical connection between observation and underlying mechanism。

  • 引资料

    P1 P2 P3 P4 P5

    整篇文章 build on a scientific study 作为 primary source:从 第2段 的 experiment design,到 第3段 的 research findings,再到 第4段-5 的 researchers' interpretation。虽然没有 explicit citation format,但文章多次 reference 'scientists', 'researchers', 'the study',让整个 argument 建立在 empirical research 的 foundation 上。这种 evidence-based approach 显著增强了文章的 authority and credibility。

    信号词 according to research shows studies indicate experts agree scientists found researchers explain evidence suggests data reveals surveys show

    仿写: 当你 make important claims 时,问自己:能否用 research, expert views, or established data 来 support it?不要只说 'I think' 或 'it seems',而要说 'According to research from [来源]' 或 'Studies show that'。模版:'[引入来源] found/shows/suggests that [具体发现] → [你的诠释或应用]'。即使没有 formal citation,也要 clearly indicate 信息来自 external authority。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

8 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 研究发现的反常识性暗示

    P1
    Now, believe it or not, people sometimes lie in order to maintain a good, honest reputation—even if it hurts them to do so.

    委婉表达 believe it or not surprisingly oddly enough strangely counterintuitively unexpectedly against all odds

    作者通过 believe it or not 这个 phrase 明确 signal 即将呈现的 finding 是 counterintuitive 的——人们竟然会 lie to appear honest even when it costs them。这个 implication creates intrigue 并 establishes the central paradox that drives 整篇文章。对于 main thesis 的作用是:它 sets up the fundamental tension between actual honesty and perceived honesty,这正是 the third type of lying 的 defining characteristic。这种 opening strategy makes readers curious about how this paradox works,从而为后续的 experimental evidence and theoretical explanation 做好铺垫。

  • 实验结果的异常性强调

    P3
    With surprising results, they found that 12% of respondents reported the distance they drove as less than the actual figure, giving an average answer of 384 miles.

    情态词 With surprising results surprising unexpected remarkable astonishing striking notable

    Surprising results 这个 phrase explicitly tells us 这个 12% underreporting rate 不是 trivial or predictable,而是 challenges our assumptions about rational self-interest。The implication 是:如果人们 truly acted rationally for financial gain,不该有人 underreport mileage。这个 finding directly supports the main thesis by providing concrete evidence that people sacrifice money to maintain reputation。对 article structure 的作用是:这个 surprising data serves as the empirical foundation for the theoretical claim about the third type of lying,making the argument more credible。

  • 动机解释中的假设明示

    P4
    The researchers believe this was to seem honest, with the assumption being that others would be suspicious of a high expense claim.

    模糊限制语 with the assumption being that presumably it is assumed that the assumption is one might assume arguably it seems likely that

    With the assumption being that 这个 phrase reveals 研究者在 making an inferential leap:他们观察到 underreporting behavior,然后 infer 背后的 motivation is fear of appearing dishonest。The implication 是这个 explanation isn't directly proven by the data,而是 researchers' interpretation。对 main thesis 的价值在于:虽然是 assumption,但这个 reasoning logically connects the behavior (underreporting) to the proposed motive (maintaining honest reputation),从而 builds the theoretical framework for the third type of lying。这种 cautious presentation also adds credibility by showing researchers acknowledge the interpretive nature of their claims。

  • 关切程度的条件限定

    P4
    If they care enough, their concern about appearing honest and not losing the respect of others may be greater than their desire to actually be honest.

    条件句 If they care enough if provided that as long as on condition that given that assuming that

    If they care enough 这个 conditional clause 暗示不是所有人都会 engage in reputation-protecting lies,只有 those who care sufficiently about others' perceptions 才会。The implication 是这种 lying behavior has a threshold:只有当 reputation concern crosses a certain intensity level,人们才会 sacrifice honesty for appearance。对 main thesis 的作用是:这个 qualification makes the argument more nuanced and credible by acknowledging individual differences,同时 it explains why this third type of lying isn't universally observed but occurs under specific psychological conditions where reputation value exceeds honesty value。

  • 研究意义的反问式引入

    P6
    So why is this research important?

    反问句 So why is this research important? why is this important what does this mean how does this matter why should we care what are the implications why does this matter

    这个 rhetorical question signals 文章从 presenting research findings 转向 explaining broader implications。The implication 是前面的 experimental data 不是孤立的,而是 fits into a larger theoretical framework about lying。对 article structure 的作用是:这个 question creates a natural transition,prompting readers to consider how this new finding relates to existing knowledge about lying。它 sets up paragraph 6's discussion of lie typology,从而 justify why the third type of lying deserves recognition as a distinct category。这种 structural device makes the logical flow more explicit。

  • 新假设的争议性承认

    P7
    Now this hypothesis is new and some skeptics argue that this isn't a whole new category of lie.

    对比类 some skeptics argue skeptics argue critics claim some contend opponents suggest detractors say doubters maintain

    Some skeptics argue 这个 phrase explicitly acknowledges 第三类谎言的 classification is controversial。The implication 是这个 hypothesis 还处于 being debated rather than widely accepted,意味着 readers should view it as a proposed framework rather than proven fact。对 main thesis 的作用是双重的:一方面,acknowledging skepticism shows intellectual honesty and adds credibility;另一方面,it prepares readers for paragraph 8 where the author will defend the hypothesis by explaining why it seems intuitive,从而 complete the argumentative structure by presenting both sides before taking a position。

  • 个人直觉的佐证力度

    P8
    But the findings seem intuitive to me.

    模糊限制语 seem intuitive to me seem intuitive strike me as appear to be it seems to me I find it makes sense to me

    Seem intuitive to me 这个 phrase 表明作者在 responding to skeptics by appealing to intuitive reasoning rather than empirical evidence。The implication 是虽然 hard proof may be limited,但 the logic makes common sense。对 main thesis 的价值在于:after presenting skepticism in paragraph 7,作者 uses intuitive appeal to defend the third-type-of-lying hypothesis,arguing 既然 lying to gain status is common,那么 lying to maintain status (by appearing honest) logically follows。这种 reasoning strategy closes the article by giving readers a way to personally evaluate the claim's plausibility beyond just accepting researcher assertions。

  • 因果推理的可能性表达

    P8
    So it seems highly likely that people will lie to seem honest.

    模糊限制语 So it seems highly likely that it seems likely probably it's probable that chances are most likely in all likelihood

    Seems highly likely 这个 phrase 表明作者在 making a general inference from specific findings。The implication 是虽然 experiment only showed 12% underreporting in one scenario,作者 extends this to a broader claim about human behavior。对 main thesis 的作用是:这个 carefully hedged conclusion ties together the evidence and reasoning,asserting the third type of lying is real while acknowledging it's an inference rather than proven fact。这种 measured conclusion reinforces the article's main point while maintaining intellectual honesty about the limits of what can be definitively claimed from the research presented。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Convinced Endorsement)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 定位评论段 P1 P6 P7 P8

    说明文的主体任务是传递information,中间大段讲real research、data、explanation都是在陈述fact,如果只读这些内容很容易误判作者是纯粹neutral的,但真正的态度通常集中出现在结尾的评论段落里。

  2. 抓转折后立场 P7 P8

    说明文常用concession(让步)加but转折的结构,先客观摆出对立观点显得fair,但紧跟着but后面的内容才是作者真正想表达的judgment,这是判断态度最直接的signal。

  3. 抓"to me"表态句 P8

    说明文一般用objective的语气讲述study,一旦出现"to me"、"I think"这种first-person marker,就是态度最explicit、权重最高的证据,比任何描述性词汇都更可靠。

  4. 三证据交叉验证 P1 P7 P8

    三个前置步骤分别锁定了评论区位置、转折后立场、以及first-person的直接表态,三者结论high度一致,都指向作者站在researcher一边,attitude类型清晰、无矛盾。

文中的态度信号词

  • But P8

    这个but把前文skeptics的质疑和作者自己的judgment连接起来,形成明显的转折,标志着作者要引出与质疑不同的、更加positive的个人立场。

    同类词 However Yet Still Nonetheless

  • intuitive P8

    intuitive是作者对research findings给出的positive evaluative adjective,直接表达出一种"我觉得这合理"的认同感,是判断attitude类型的关键词。

    同类词 makes sense sensible reasonable plausible

  • highly likely P8

    highly likely这个程度副词组合强化了作者对结论的confidence,说明态度不是模糊中立,而是比较坚定的support。

    同类词 certainly clearly undoubtedly surely

  • some skeptics argue P7

    这句话是作者主动引入的对立观点,属于concession(让步),目的是先显得fair和balanced,再用后续的but转折凸显自己真正支持researcher的立场。

    同类词 skeptics argue critics claim some argue opponents contend

  • believe it or not P1

    开篇这句话透露出作者对research结论的surprised而非skeptical的初始反应,为后文表达支持立场埋下伏笔,说明作者从一开始就倾向于相信这个counter-intuitive的发现。

    同类词 surprisingly remarkably interestingly

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇说明文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇说明文?

  1. 首段引入研究发现 P1

    本文 第1段 直接 present 了一个 research finding(人们为了 maintain honest reputation 而撒谎),这是典型的 expository opening,既不是 argumentative claim(议论文会说"我们应该/不应该"),也不是 news lead(新闻会强调时间地点和突发性)。

  2. 详细场景和数据举例 P2 P3

    第2段 和 第3段 提供了非常 specific 的 scenario(报销里程的例子)和 quantitative data(12%的人少报了里程,平均384英里)。这种 illustrative approach 是说明文的标志,议论文不会花这么多笔墨 elaborate examples,新闻则会 focus on actual events 而非 hypothetical scenarios。

  3. 研究者归因表达 P4 P5

    第4段 和 第5段 反复出现 'the researchers believe/explain/assert',这种 third-person attribution 表明作者在 relay information 而非 express personal views。议论文会用 I argue/we should/it is clear that 这类 direct statements,新闻虽也有 attribution 但会更 focused on who/when/where。

  4. 类型分类和背景铺垫 P6 P7

    第6段 和 第7段 花费大量篇幅 explain the broader context(两种主要的谎言类型)并 introduce 一个 new category(第三种谎言)。这种 systematic categorization 和 contextualization 是典型的 expository structure,议论文不会如此 methodically lay out categories,而会 directly argue for one position。

  5. 整体来看,文章没有 call for action 或 strong prescriptive statements(议论文特征),也没有 breaking news elements 或 journalistic urgency(新闻特征),而是 systematically unpack 一个研究发现,从 introduction → illustration → explanation → contextualization → reflection,完整呈现了说明文的 information-delivery mission。

哪些词暴露了说明文体裁?

  • a team of scientists is suggesting, with evidence to prove it P1 研究来源与证据引入词 scientists suggest researchers found study shows evidence indicates research demonstrates
  • Picture this scenario P2 说明方式引导词(举例说明) for example for instance such as imagine that consider this
  • The scientists asked this exact question as part of the study P3 研究过程描述词 the study examined researchers conducted the experiment involved participants were asked the methodology included
  • With surprising results, they found that P3 研究结果呈现词 results showed findings revealed data indicated it was discovered that analysis demonstrated
  • The researchers believe/explain that P4 专家解释归因词 experts explain scientists interpret researchers attribute scholars suggest analysts conclude
  • The researchers assert that the findings suggest P5 研究结论总结词 the study concludes findings indicate research suggests results imply evidence points to
  • So why is this research important? Well, experts generally agree P6 重要性阐述与背景知识引入词 this is significant because the importance lies in experts agree that it is generally accepted scholars recognize
  • there are two main types P6 分类说明词 can be divided into falls into categories consists of several types includes various forms categorized as
  • But the researchers are suggesting a third type P7 新发现提出词 a new category emerges researchers propose scientists introduce studies reveal another findings suggest an additional
  • Now this hypothesis is new and some skeptics argue P7 学术争议呈现词 critics question debate exists about some researchers disagree there is controversy over scholars dispute
  • But the findings seem intuitive to me P8 作者评价与综合词 it makes sense that this seems logical the explanation appears sound this is consistent with the reasoning holds
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

6 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 的常见问题

2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
研究人员发现了第三种撒谎类型:人们有时会为了显得诚实和维护声誉而撒谎,即使这会让他们蒙受经济损失,因为他们预判到他人会怀疑过于有利的结果,因此更看重被认为诚实而非实际诚实。(英文表述:Researchers have identified a third type of lying: people sometimes lie to appear honest and maintain their reputation, even when it costs them financially, because they anticipate others' suspicion of overly favorable outcomes and prioritize being perceived as honest over actual honesty.)
2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为说明文,作者立场是积极支持(Convinced Endorsement)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 404 词、8 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 8 段按说明文骨架分为 8 个意群:第1段——引出现象;第2段——情境设定与研究设计;第3段——研究发现;第4段——结果解释与动机分析;第5段——研究结论与行为模式总结;第6段——研究意义与理论背景;第7段——提出新理论分类与学术争议;第8段——作者立场与论证总结。
2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Convinced Endorsement)。判断路径:定位评论段 → 抓转折后立场 → 抓"to me"表态句 → 三证据交叉验证;文中的态度信号词包括 But(第8段)、intuitive(第8段)、highly likely(第8段)、some skeptics argue(第7段)、believe it or not(第1段)。
2020年12月英语六级真题第1套 Part II Section C (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:forfeit(放弃,丧失(权利、财产等))、detriment(损害,伤害,不利)、fraudulent(欺诈的,fraudulent的)、intuitive(直觉的,凭直觉得到的)、compensate(补偿,赔偿,报酬),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: