2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A
CET-6 · 来自 2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 · Part III Section A · 完形填空(选词填空)

2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A

说明文 · 完形填空(选词填空) · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章的精读视角页——这篇说明文全文 267 词、4 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

4 段英文原文

以下为2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 的完形填空(选词填空)原文,共 4 段。左侧 P1–P4 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

The number of devices you can talk to is multiplying—first it was your phone, then your car, and now you can tell your kitchen appliance what to do. But even without gadgets that understand our spoken commands, research suggests that, as bizarre as it sounds, under certain circumstances, people regularly ascribe human traits to everyday objects.

Sometimes we see things as human because we are lonely. In one experiment, people who reported feeling isolated were more likely than others to attribute consciousness to various gadgets. In turn, feeling close to objects can alleviate loneliness. When college students were reminded of a time they had been excluded in a social setting they compensated by exaggerating their number of friends—unless they were first given tasks that caused them to interact with their phone as if it had human qualities. The phone apparently stood in for real friends.

At other times, we personify products in an effort to understand them. One study found that three in four respondents yelled at their computer. Further, the more their computer gave them problems, the more likely the respondents were to report that it had its own "beliefs and desires".

So how do people assign traits to an object? In part, we rely on looks. On humans, wide faces are associated with dominance. Similarly, people rated cars, clocks and watches with wide faces as more dominant-looking than narrow-faced ones, and preferred them—especially in competitive situations. An analysis of car sales in Germany found that cars with grilles(护栅) that were upturned like smiles sold best. The purchasers saw this feature as increasing a car's friendliness.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

4 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Humanization of Everyday Objects

    People commonly personify everyday objects, even without advanced technology.

    本段承担 introduction 的作用,它提出“物品人格化”这一总现象,为后文分别解释 loneliness、understanding 和 visual cues 等原因搭建了 discussion framework。

    抓住转折后的现象
  2. P2

    Loneliness and Human-Like Objects

    Lonely people personify objects because these objects can provide social comfort.

    本段是对全文主旨中 loneliness 原因的展开,它用心理实验说明,人格化不是随意想象,而是一种缓解 social isolation 的补偿机制。

    归纳实验的共同因果
  3. P3

    Personification as a Way to Understand Technology

    People personify troublesome products to understand their behavior.

    本段补充了全文的第二个原因:面对复杂或出故障的 device,人们把它想成有 beliefs and desires 的人,从而让难以解释的行为变得可理解。

    识别另一种人格化动因
  4. P4

    Facial Cues in Product Personification

    People use human-like facial cues to judge products as dominant or friendly.

    本段解释全文主旨中的 visual cues:人们不仅因孤独或理解需求而人格化物品,也会依据 face-like appearance 自动推断其 personality,这种推断甚至会影响 sales。

    从外观例子归纳判断规律
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

4 道逐段细节自检题

针对2019年12月英语六级真题第3套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 research suggests everyday objects

    What does research suggest about people's responses to everyday objects?

    • A They communicate effectively only with voice-controlled devices.
    • B They regard all household appliances as conscious beings.
    • C They may attribute human characteristics to ordinary things in some situations.
    • D They prefer cars and phones to other kinds of objects.
    • E They stop assigning emotions to objects when technology improves.
    • F They use objects mainly to give spoken commands to other people.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项完整保留了结论的三个限制:people 的主体、human characteristics 的核心行为,以及 in some situations 的条件边界。ordinary things 是 everyday objects 的同义替换,attribute human characteristics 对应 ascribe human traits,属于六级常见的抽象名词改写。障碍在于原文先铺陈 voice-controlled devices,容易让考生误以为结论仅适用于智能设备;正确项却准确回到了 ordinary things 这一更宽的范围。

    遮例留骨架 时间紧张时,先从题干的 research suggest 反向扫描,直接定位 第1段 中的结论标记;不要从第一句的 devices 例子开始逐句读。随后使用“删例子法”:暂时遮住 phone、car、kitchen appliance 等名词,只保留 people、objects、human traits、circumstances 这一逻辑骨架。能完全贴合该骨架且不扩大条件的正确项,就是答案项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 exaggerate their number of friends social exclusion

    Why did the students not exaggerate their number of friends after social exclusion?

    • A They were asked to recall more close friendships from college.
    • B They had overcome their feelings of isolation through social contact.
    • C They believed that their phones could contact real friends for them.
    • D They had first interacted with a phone as though it possessed human qualities.
    • E They had been excluded because they owned too few gadgets.
    • F They considered their phones more dominant than other objects.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项精确保留了 first given tasks、interact with their phone 和 as if it had human qualities 三层实验条件。题干的 not exaggerate 对应原文中 unless 引出的例外,因而答案不是 loneliness 本身,而是改变补偿行为的前置操控。障碍在于正确项没有直接重述 friends 或 exclusion,而用 possessed human qualities 概括了关键处理条件;考生必须追踪逻辑连接词而非只寻找题干原词。

    盯住除非开关 紧急作答时,用题干中最长的行为串 exaggerate their number of friends 直达 第2段,随后只扫描其后的 unless。把 unless 视为“反例开关”:开关后面的 prior task 就是区分两组结果的唯一变量。再将选项逐个代入“先做过什么,才没有出现该行为”的句框,语法和因果都闭合的正确项即为答案项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 more problems respondents

    What was more likely when respondents' computers caused them more problems?

    • A They stopped yelling at their computers.
    • B They became less convinced that computers had consciousness.
    • C They replaced their computers with more friendly products.
    • D They found that three out of four computers were defective.
    • E They reported that their computers had their own beliefs and desires.
    • F They attributed their technical problems to other users.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项直接对应比较结构的结果端:电脑带来问题越多,respondents 越可能 report 其具有 beliefs and desires。has its own 在选项中被展开为 had their own,保持了人化归因的核心。障碍在于题干问的是 what was more likely,正确项必须保留 reported 的概率性认知,而非断言电脑实际上拥有心理状态;同时,beliefs and desires 被引号标出,也提醒读者这是受访者的归属判断。

    双more镜像 先用 more problems 扫到 第3段,不必先读 three in four 的统计句。接着用“比较级镜像法”:把题干的 more problems 与文本中另一个 more likely 强制配对,只取第二个 more 后面的内容。最后检查选项是否保留 report 的认识层级;保留该层级且匹配比较结果的正确项,即为答案项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 analysis of car sales in Germany sell best

    According to the analysis of car sales in Germany, which feature helped cars sell best?

    • A Wide faces associated with dominance.
    • B Narrow-faced designs that looked less competitive.
    • C Clocks and watches with larger displays.
    • D Cars designed mainly for competitive situations.
    • E Features that made purchasers feel more dominant.
    • F Grilles that were upturned like smiles.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项对应销售分析句中唯一直接连接 sold best 的物理特征。upturned like smiles 保留了外形细节,grilles 明确其所在部位;随后 purchasers 对 friendliness 的感知提供了合理解释。障碍在于同段还有 wide faces、dominance 和 competitive situations,均与产品外观有关,但它们来自不同的判断与偏好链,不能替代销售数据所指的 grilles。

    销量前格截取 时间最紧时,不要按段首的 wide faces 顺序阅读。直接凭题干中 Germany 这一专有地名跳至 第4段,再以 sell best 找到最高级结果。使用“结果前一格法”:只读取 sold best 前面紧贴的名词性外观描述,忽略同段其他产品与特质。这个描述所对应的正确项,就是答案项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

4 个意群的说明文骨架

按说明文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 现象引入:物品拟人化的普遍性

    这个 opening paragraph 先通过 everyday examples 引出了 talking to devices 这个日常现象,然后用 research suggests 转向核心 topic,指出 people regularly ascribe human traits to objects 是一个 under certain circumstances 发生的普遍 phenomenon,为全文的 explanation 奠定基础。

    作为 expository writing 的 introduction,这个意群通过 concrete examples 和 general statement 相结合的方式,introduce the phenomenon 并 establish the focus,让 readers 明白文章将要 explain 的 central topic 是什么。

    提出拟人化现象
  2. 原因一:孤独感驱动的拟人化

    这个 explanatory section 用 sometimes 作为 temporal marker 引出第一个 cause:loneliness。通过 two experiments 提供 empirical evidence,先说明 isolated people 更容易 attribute consciousness to gadgets,再用 in turn 展示 reciprocal effect,即 interacting with objects as humans 可以 alleviate loneliness,用 phone standing in for friends 这个具体 example 收尾。

    作为 body paragraph 的第一个 explanatory unit,这个意群通过 cause-and-effect pattern 深入 explain 一个 specific circumstance(loneliness)under which personification occurs,用 experimental evidence 增强 explanatory power,使 explanation 更加 systematic and convincing。

    解释孤独动因
  3. 原因二:理解需求驱动的拟人化

    这个 parallel explanatory section 用 at other times 引出第二个 cause:the effort to understand products。用 yelling at computers 这个 relatable behavior 作为 entry point,然后用 further 深化 explanation,指出 computer problems 越多,people 越倾向于 attribute beliefs and desires to it,展示了 personification as a cognitive strategy for comprehension。

    作为第二个 explanatory unit,这个意群 parallels 前一个 cause 的 structure,继续 expand the explanation 通过 presenting another circumstance。这种 multi-faceted explanation 是说明文 achieve comprehensiveness 的关键 strategy,让 readers 理解 phenomenon 的 different motivations。

    解释理解动因
  4. 机制探讨:视觉特征影响拟人化

    这个 mechanistic explanation section 用 so 引发 deeper inquiry:how do people assign traits?答案是 rely on looks。通过 wide faces 和 dominance 的 human association 作为 starting point,然后用 similarly 建立 parallel,说明 people 对 objects 也用同样的 visual cues 做 judgment。最后用 car grilles 的 sales analysis 提供 real-world evidence,证明 smile-like features 增强 perceived friendliness。

    作为 explanatory climax,这个意群 shifts from why(前两个意群)to how,provide mechanistic insight into the process。这种 from causes to mechanisms 的 progression 是说明文 achieve depth 的典型 strategy,让 explanation 更加 thorough and systematic。

    解释视觉机制
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 锁定首段核心现象 P1

    说明文的 opening 通常会用 general statement 引出要解释的 phenomenon 或 concept,这个现象就是全文围绕的 main subject,后续段落都是对它的 elaboration 和 support。

  2. 识别解释性展开模式 P2 P3 P4

    说明文的 body paragraphs 通常会对主题进行 classification, exemplification 或 causal analysis。如果每段都在解释 why 或 how 某个现象发生,而不是 evaluate 其好坏,那主旨就是 descriptive 和 explanatory 的,而非 argumentative。

  3. 整合多角度解释因素 P2 P3 P4

    当多个段落用不同的 angles 或 reasons 来 address 同一个 central phenomenon 时,主旨必然是对这个现象的 multi-faceted explanation。这种 parallel development 表明文章不是 focus 在某一个 specific cause,而是 presenting a comprehensive view。

  4. 整合现象与解释范畴 P1 P2 P3 P4

    说明文主旨的完整表达需要包含两部分:what is being explained(the phenomenon)和 how it's being explained(the scope of explanation)。只有同时捕捉到 subject 和 explanatory breadth,才能准确 summarize 文章的 main idea。

主旨信号词 attribute P1 human traits P1 because P2 Sometimes... At other times P2 research suggests P1

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

人们通常会将人类特征赋予日常物品和设备。这种拟人化发生在个体感到孤独、试图理解复杂设备时,或者依赖于宽脸或类似微笑的特征等视觉线索,这些线索暗示着友好或支配性。
People commonly attribute human traits to everyday objects and gadgets. This personification occurs when individuals feel lonely, seek to understand complex devices, or rely on visual cues like wide faces or smile-like features that suggest friendliness or dominance.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • ascribe 把...归因于;把...归属于

    我们先从 syntax structure 入手:'ascribe A to B' 这个固定搭配告诉我们这是把 A 施加给 B 的动作。再看 context,第2段 和 第4段 分别用 attribute 和 assign 描述同样的现象,这构成了强有力的 synonym clue。最后,从整篇文章的 logic 看,人们在物品不具备人类特质的情况下,仍然主观地建立这种联系,这是一种 psychological attribution。把这三条 clues 整合起来,ascribe 的意思就很清晰了。

    句法+同义+逻辑三维推断法
  • alleviate 减轻;缓解

    我们从 causal logic 入手:feeling close to objects 作为 intervention,对 loneliness 产生作用,这种作用从 context 判断是积极的。然后我们用 morphology 验证:lev- 词根本身就有"减轻"的语义。最后,紧跟的 experimental evidence 提供了 concrete validation:phone 的 substitution effect 正是 alleviation 的体现。三条 clues 共同指向同一个 meaning。

    因果+词源+实证三步验证
  • personify 使人格化;赋予人性

    这个词的推断非常典型:首先,morphology 给出了最直接的 hint——person + ify 的组合明确无误;然后,immediate context 中的 example (yelling at computer, attributing beliefs) 提供了 behavioral evidence;最后,从 discourse level 看,这个词是对全文 theme 的精确 summarization。三个 layers 的 clues 完美对齐。

    构词+例证+篇章三层推理
  • dominance 支配地位;统治力

    我们先从 semantic association 入手:wide faces 这个 physical trait 和某种 powerful quality 相关联。然后通过 contextual contrast:competitive situations 需要这种特质,而 friendliness 是相反的特质。最后用 morphology 验证:domin- 词根本身就承载"支配"的 meaning。三条线索形成 triangulation,共同指向 dominance 的 precise definition。

    具象特征+对比语境+词源验证
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

6 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例子

    P1

    作者在 第1段 提到 phone、car、kitchen appliance 这些 everyday gadgets,用 concrete examples 来说明 devices you can talk to 的范围在不断扩大。这种 enumeration 让 abstract concept 变得 tangible,帮助 readers 快速理解 personification 发生的 context,为后文探讨 why people attribute human traits 搭建了 real-world foundation。

    信号词 first...then...now for example such as for instance take...for example like including say

    仿写: 当你想 explain 一个 broad trend 或 phenomenon 时,问自己:What are three everyday instances that readers encounter?选择 familiar objects 或 situations,用 progression 排列(from simple to complex)。模版:「The number of [现象主体] is [动态变化]—first it was [例1], then [例2], and now [例3]」。这种 parallel structure 既 rhythmic 又 persuasive。

  • 引资料

    P2 P3 P4

    第2段 和 第3段 多次提到 experiment、one study、respondents 这些 research-based evidence。比如「In one experiment, people who reported feeling isolated...」和「One study found that three in four respondents yelled...」。这些 empirical data 为 personification phenomenon 提供了 scientific backing,让 explanation 不只是 subjective opinion,而是有 credible research support。这对 main idea 至关重要,因为它 validates 了 people regularly ascribe human traits 这个看似 bizarre 的 behavior。

    信号词 In one experiment research suggests One study found An analysis studies show according to evidence indicates data reveals findings suggest

    仿写: 当阐述 surprising facts 或 psychological patterns 时,问自己:What research backs this up?引用时保持 concise:「In one [研究类型], [研究对象] were more likely to [行为结果]」。避免 overwhelming readers with too many statistics,选择 most striking finding 即可。模版:「[Research type] found that [quantified result] + [specific behavior]」,比如「One study found that three in four respondents [did X]」。

  • 列数字

    P3

    第3段 提到「three in four respondents yelled at their computer」,这个 specific fraction 让 abstract behavior 变得 measurable。通过 quantifying 这个 seemingly irrational action,作者 demonstrates 有多普遍 people personify objects when frustrated。这个 precise data 支撑了 main idea,showing 这不是 isolated incidents,而是 widespread pattern,增强了 argument 的 persuasiveness。

    信号词 three in four 75% half of one in three majority a quarter twice as likely doubled increased by

    仿写: 当描述 behavior frequency 或 prevalence 时,问自己:Can I quantify this?用 fractions(three in four)比 percentages(75%)更 conversational,适合 general audience。模版:「[Fraction] + [subjects] + [specific action]」,比如「Two in three students reported [behavior]」。记住,choose memorable numbers—「three in four」比「74.3%」更 sticky in readers' minds。

  • 作比较

    P4

    第4段 用「On humans, wide faces are associated with dominance. Similarly, people rated cars, clocks and watches...」这个 explicit comparison。作者先建立 human trait 的 baseline(wide faces = dominance),然后 extend 到 inanimate objects,showing 我们如何 transfer 对 human features 的 interpretation 到 everyday products。这个 parallel 直接支撑了 main idea:people assign human traits based on visual cues,因为我们 unconsciously apply human-perception rules 到 non-human things。

    信号词 Similarly In the same way likewise just as compared to in contrast whereas while more...than as...as

    仿写: 当解释 perceptual patterns 或 cognitive transfers 时,问自己:What's the familiar reference point?先描述 well-known case,再用「Similarly」「In the same way」引出 target case。模版:「On [熟悉对象], [特征] is associated with [属性]. Similarly, [目标对象] with [相同特征] are perceived as [相同属性]」。这种 A-to-B structure 让 logical connection 清晰可见。

  • 作诠释

    P2

    第2段 中「The phone apparently stood in for real friends」是对前文 experiment 结果的 interpretive explanation。作者不只是 report 了 data(students interacted with phones),还 clarifies 这个 behavior 的 underlying meaning:the phone functioned as a social substitute。这种 elaboration 帮助 readers 理解 deeper implication,connecting isolated finding 到 broader theme of personification alleviating loneliness,directly supporting main idea。

    信号词 apparently in other words that is to say this suggests this means in effect essentially put simply

    仿写: 在 presenting research findings 后,问自己:So what does this really mean?用「apparently」「in other words」「this suggests」引出 interpretation。模版:「[观察到的行为] apparently [更深层含义]」或「This suggests that [解释性结论]」。关键是 go beyond surface description,explain the psychological or logical significance behind the observed pattern。

  • 分类别

    P2 P3 P4

    整篇文章通过「Sometimes...At other times...So how...」这种 categorical structure 组织 content。第2段 探讨 loneliness-driven personification,第3段 讨论 understanding-driven cases,第4段 分析 looks-based attribution。这种 systematic categorization 让 complex phenomenon 变得 organized,showing personification 不是 random,而是有 distinct triggers 和 mechanisms,perfectly supporting main idea by demonstrating multiple pathways through which people assign human traits。

    信号词 Sometimes...At other times One type...Another type First...Second...Third can be divided into falls into categories There are several kinds ranges from...to

    仿写: 当面对 multifaceted topic 时,问自己:What are the distinct types or causes?用 transitional phrases 标记 categories:「Sometimes...At other times...」或「One reason...Another factor...」。确保 categories 有 clear boundaries 且 mutually exclusive。模版:「[Category marker A], [现象] occurs because [原因A]. [Category marker B], [现象] happens when [原因B]」。这种 parallel structure 让 classification 清晰可见。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

5 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 人机交互的异常性暗示

    P1
    as bizarre as it sounds, under certain circumstances, people regularly ascribe human traits to everyday objects

    委婉表达 bizarre unusual strange oddly surprisingly curiously remarkably

    表面上作者用 bizarre 承认这个behavior sounds weird,但言外之意是在establish credibility——'我understand你的skepticism,但let me show you the research'。这个move对文章主旨crucial,因为整篇文章就是在argue一个potentially strange idea:人们会给inanimate objects赋予human traits。通过在opening就acknowledge这个strangeness,作者preemptively addresses reader的doubts,然后用 regularly 和 research suggests 来build authority。这个strategy让subsequent paragraphs的examples和evidence显得more convincing,因为作者已经demonstrated awareness of how unusual this topic might seem。

  • 社交缺失的补偿机制

    P2
    they compensated by exaggerating their number of friends—unless they were first given tasks that caused them to interact with their phone as if it had human qualities

    对比类 compensated unless but however in contrast whereas alternatively

    这个sentence的言外之意非常rich。表面上是在describe一个experimental finding,但实际传递的message是:人类有一个fundamental need for social connection,当这个need不能通过real human interaction满足时,people will find substitutes——无论是exaggerating existing friendships还是treating objects as if they're human。'The phone apparently stood in for real friends'这个conclusion makes this implicit message explicit。这对文章主旨至关重要,因为它provides a psychological explanation for为什么people personify objects:it's not just a quirk,而是a coping mechanism for loneliness。这个insight elevates the topic from'people do this weird thing'到'people do this because of a deep psychological need',让整篇文章的argument更有depth和explanatory power。

  • 技术理解的拟人化策略

    P3
    Further, the more their computer gave them problems, the more likely the respondents were to report that it had its own 'beliefs and desires'

    递进类 Further Furthermore Moreover Additionally What's more Beyond that Even more

    这个sentence的言外之意是:personification不是a passive or arbitrary phenomenon,而是an active cognitive strategy that intensifies with need。当computer给用户more problems时,用户更倾向于attribute beliefs and desires to it,这暗示人们use anthropomorphism as a sense-making tool——给object赋予intentions帮助我们explain和predict its behavior。这个insight对文章主旨crucial,因为它provides the second major explanation(after loneliness in 第2段)for why people personify objects:it's a way to understand and cope with complex or frustrating technology。这个functional explanation让personification seem less bizarre and more like a rational(虽然unconscious)cognitive strategy。作者通过这个correlation subtly argues that anthropomorphism serves psychological purposes,which reinforces the main thesis that personification is a common and meaningful human behavior。

  • 视觉特征的社会意义投射

    P4
    On humans, wide faces are associated with dominance. Similarly, people rated cars, clocks and watches with wide faces as more dominant-looking than narrow-faced ones

    类比类 Similarly Likewise In the same way Just as By the same token Analogously Correspondingly

    这个analogy的言外之意非常profound。表面上是在说wide-faced objects被perceived as more dominant,但deeper message是:人类automatically and unconsciously apply social perception rules to non-social objects。我们不只是rationally thinking'这个car有wide grille',而是在a pre-cognitive level processing it through the same neural pathways we use to assess human faces。这个reveals that personification不是a conscious decision or a quirky behavior,而是deeply embedded in our perceptual and cognitive architecture。对文章主旨而言,这是the most fundamental explanation:我们给objects赋予human traits because our brains are wired to perceive the world through a social lens。这个biological/cognitive foundation makes all the previous examples(loneliness compensation, sense-making)seem even more inevitable and universal。作者通过这个seemingly simple analogy实际上在arguing that anthropomorphism is hard-wired into human cognition。

  • 市场验证的情感偏好

    P4
    people rated cars, clocks and watches with wide faces as more dominant-looking than narrow-faced ones, and preferred them—especially in competitive situations

    情态词 preferred favored liked appreciated valued desired sought

    这个statement的言外之意在于reveal personification has real-world consequences。不只是人们see cars as having faces,而是这个perception influences purchasing decisions,especially在competitiveness matters的situations。这暗示人们strategically select objects based on the human traits they project,treating objects as extensions of self or tools for social signaling。言外之意更深层的是:anthropomorphism isn't just a perceptual phenomenon,而是shapes consumer behavior and potentially social dynamics。对文章主旨而言,这个insight是crucial closing move,因为它demonstrates that personification不只是interesting psychological quirk,而是has tangible impacts on how people interact with the material world and construct their social identity。通过ending with a market analysis,作者implicitly argues that anthropomorphism is so pervasive and powerful that it drives economic behavior,which is the strongest possible evidence for the thesis that people regularly ascribe human traits to objects。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( Objective and informative with mild interest)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 引用研究发现的频率 P1 P2 P3 P4

    说明文的 typical feature 就是 presenting information objectively。当你看到文章 repeatedly cite research 和 experiments 的时候,这通常 indicate 作者的 role 是 information provider 而非 opinion advocate,因此态度偏向 neutral and factual。

  2. 动词与修饰语的情感色彩 P1 P2 P3 P4

    在说明文中,evaluative language 的 presence or absence 直接 reflect 作者的 stance。Neutral descriptive verbs 表明作者是在 objectively reporting,而 emotionally charged modifiers 会 reveal 作者的 subjective attitude towards the phenomenon。

  3. 让步与事实的衔接方式 P1

    说明文作者虽然保持 overall neutrality,但在 topic framing 上仍可能 reveal subtle attitudes。'Bizarre as it sounds' 这类 concessive clause 表明作者 acknowledge 这个现象的 unusual nature,但紧接着用 'research suggests' 来 legitimize it,这种 balance 显示出 objective curiosity 而非 skepticism or advocacy。

  4. 结构完整性与结尾策略 P1 P2 P3 P4

    说明文的 structural completeness 能 reveal 作者的 ultimate intention。如果文章以 open-ended facts 结束而非 persuasive conclusion,说明作者的 goal 是 educating readers about a phenomenon 而非 convincing them to adopt a position。这种 descriptive closure 是 neutral explanatory attitude 的 strong indicator。

  5. 证据驱动的中性科普 P1 P2 P3 P4

    综合四个步骤的 findings,我们能 confirm 这是典型的 objective expository attitude。Citation-based structure + neutral reporting language + balanced framing + descriptive closure 共同 construct 了一个 information-oriented discourse,作者的 role 是 knowledge transmitter 而非 opinion advocate。

文中的态度信号词

  • research suggests P1

    这个 phrase 是典型的 academic hedging language,表明作者在 reporting scientific findings 而不是 stating personal beliefs。'Suggests' 这个 verb 比 'proves' 或 'shows' 更加 tentative,体现了 scientific caution 和 objectivity,支持作者的 neutral, evidence-based attitude。

    同类词 studies show evidence indicates findings reveal data demonstrate experiments found

  • bizarre as it sounds P1

    这个 concessive expression 显示作者 acknowledge 这个 phenomenon 的 counterintuitive nature,但用 'as it sounds' 而非 'as it is' 表明他在 referencing common perception 而不是 making his own judgment。紧接着用 research 来 substantiate the claim,这种 pattern 体现了作者 balanced 的态度——既 recognize 话题的 unusual quality 以 engage readers,又保持 objective reporting。

    同类词 strange as it may seem surprisingly interestingly curiously remarkably

  • one experiment/one study/an analysis P2

    这些 phrases 是 source attribution markers,表明作者在 systematically presenting evidence from multiple studies。每段开头用 different research examples 来 support different aspects of the phenomenon,这种 structure 显示作者的 role 是 synthesizing existing knowledge 而非 creating arguments,strongly support 了 objective, informative attitude。

    同类词 one experiment one study research shows an analysis a survey

  • people who reported/were more likely/compensated by P2

    这些 passive and neutral descriptive phrases 用来 report experimental observations without adding evaluative commentary。作者在 describing human behaviors 时保持 observational distance,用 'reported'、'were more likely' 这类 objective language 而非 'oddly chose to' 或 'wisely decided to',这 maintain 了 scientific objectivity and support neutral attitude。

    同类词 people who reported respondents were more likely participants showed subjects tended to individuals exhibited

  • So how do people P4

    这个 rhetorical question 是 expository discourse 的典型 transitional device,作者用它来 introduce explanation section。'So' 这个 discourse marker 显示 logical progression,而 'how do people' 的 phrasing 保持了 inquiry-based tone 而非 assertive judgment。这种 question-answer structure 是 informative writing 的 characteristic feature,support 作者的 educational purpose and objective attitude。

    同类词 So how do Why do people What causes How does this happen What explains

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇说明文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇说明文?

  1. 开头引入现象 P1

    第1段 开头就 introduce 了一个 phenomenon:我们能和越来越多的 devices 交流,并且人们会给 everyday objects 赋予 human traits。这是在 present a topic 而不是 state an opinion 或 report breaking news,明确是 expository 的开场方式。

  2. 分点解释原因 P2 P3

    第2段 和 第3段 分别解释了 two different circumstances:loneliness 导致 personification,以及为了 understand products 而 personify them。每段都在 explain why people ascribe human traits to objects,这是典型的 expository breakdown,不是在 argue for a position 也不是在 report events as they unfold。

  3. 中性客观用词 P1 P2 P3 P4

    全文中出现 'research suggests'、'In one experiment'、'One study found'、'An analysis of car sales',这些都是 citing evidence 来 support explanations 的标志。同时用了 'Sometimes'、'At other times'、'So how' 这类 organizational markers 来 structure the explanation,语言 tone 是 informative 而非 persuasive 或 reportorial。

  4. 解释现象机制 P1 P2 P3 P4

    这篇文章完全符合 expository pattern:开头 introduce 了 personification phenomenon,中间 systematically explain different reasons (loneliness, understanding, appearance),每个 reason 都有 research backing,最后 extend 到 practical application (car design),整体是在 inform readers about why and how 这个现象发生,而非 persuade 或 report。

哪些词暴露了说明文体裁?

  • The number of devices... is multiplying P1 说明对象定义解释词 The number of... is multiplying research suggests that people regularly ascribe... to attribute... to define... as
  • Sometimes P2 说明顺序与例证词 At other times First... then... now In one experiment One study found For example
  • At other times P3 说明顺序与例证词 Sometimes First... then... now In one experiment One study found For example
  • people who reported feeling isolated were more likely than others to P2 事物属性功能描述词 were more likely to tend to are associated with can alleviate cause them to
  • So how do people assign traits to an object? P4 说明顺序与例证词 So how do... Why does... What causes... How is... achieved In what ways...
  • In one experiment P2 说明顺序与例证词 One study found Research shows An analysis of... found According to research Scientists discovered
  • One study found P3 说明顺序与例证词 In one experiment Research shows An analysis of... found According to research Scientists discovered
  • An analysis of car sales in Germany found P4 说明顺序与例证词 In one experiment One study found Research shows An analysis of... found According to research
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

5 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 的常见问题

2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章的主旨是什么?
人们通常会将人类特征赋予日常物品和设备。这种拟人化发生在个体感到孤独、试图理解复杂设备时,或者依赖于宽脸或类似微笑的特征等视觉线索,这些线索暗示着友好或支配性。(英文表述:People commonly attribute human traits to everyday objects and gadgets. This personification occurs when individuals feel lonely, seek to understand complex devices, or rely on visual cues like wide faces or smile-like features that suggest friendliness or dominance.)
2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为说明文,作者立场是客观中立(Objective and informative with mild interest)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 267 词、4 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 4 段按说明文骨架分为 4 个意群:第1段——现象引入:物品拟人化的普遍性;第2段——原因一:孤独感驱动的拟人化;第3段——原因二:理解需求驱动的拟人化;第4段——机制探讨:视觉特征影响拟人化。
2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(Objective and informative with mild interest)。判断路径:引用研究发现的频率 → 动词与修饰语的情感色彩 → 让步与事实的衔接方式 → 结构完整性与结尾策略 → 证据驱动的中性科普;文中的态度信号词包括 research suggests(第1段)、bizarre as it sounds(第1段)、one experiment/one study/an analysis(第2段)、people who reported/were more likely/compensated by(第2段)、So how do people(第4段)。
2019年12月英语六级真题第3套 Part III Section A 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:ascribe(把...归因于;把...归属于)、alleviate(减轻;缓解)、personify(使人格化;赋予人性)、dominance(支配地位;统治力),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: