2017年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (2) Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?
Postgraduate · 来自 2017年考研英语二真题 · Section II Part A (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?

2017年考研英语二真题文章逐层精读

The Independent《独立报》2016年6月7日一篇题为 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?(在智能手机和平板电脑上花太多时间会损害孩子的成长发展吗?)的文章。

本页是 2017年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 424 词、4 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在考研英语二文章中占 77%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他考研英语真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

4 段英文原文

以下为2017年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 4 段。左侧 P1–P4 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?

With so much focus on children's use of screens, it's easy for parents to forget about their own screen use. "Tech is designed to really suck you in," says Jenny Radesky in her study of digital play, "and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage, and leads to a lot of bleed-over into the family routine."

Radesky has studied the use of mobile phones and tablets at mealtimes by giving mother-child pairs a food-testing exercise. She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 per cent fewer verbal and 39 per cent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children. During a separate observation, she saw that phones became a source of tension in the family. Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.

Infants are wired to look at parents' faces to try to understand their world, and if those faces are blank and unresponsive – as they often are when absorbed in a device – it can be extremely disconcerting for the children. Radesky cites the "still face experiment" devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s. In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback: The child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother's attention. "Parents don't have to be exquisitely present at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child's verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need," says Radesky.

On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids' use of screens are born out of an "oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting" with their children: "It's based on a somewhat fantasised, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology that says if you're failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them." Tronick believes that just because a child isn't learning from the screen doesn't mean there's no value to it – particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child. Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

4 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2017年考研英语二真题 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    The Overlooked Problem of Parental Screen Use

    Parents' screen use can easily spill over into family life because digital devices are designed to be highly engaging.

    本段承担 introduction 的功能,它把文章从常见的儿童 screen-time 焦虑,转向较少被讨论的 parental screen use。它为全文主旨中的负面一端奠基:父母使用设备确实可能削弱家庭中的 emotional connection,但此时作者尚未作绝对否定,给后文的 balanced approach 留出了论证空间。

    抓住关注焦点的转移
  2. P2

    Evidence of Disrupted Parent-Child Interaction

    Research shows that parents' device use reduces interaction with children and can create family tension.

    本段是全文负面论证的 evidence paragraph,它具体证实了 第1段 所说的家庭生活被屏幕使用侵入。它尤其服务于文章主旨中的 negatively impact parent-child interaction:父母看屏幕并非私人小事,而会减少孩子获得的语言和非语言回应,并制造亲子间的 tension。

    从数据归纳危害
  3. P3

    Why Responsive Parenting Matters

    Unresponsive parental behavior can distress children, so parents should remain emotionally responsive while maintaining balance.

    本段把 第2段 中可见的互动减少,深化为儿童 emotional connection 和安全感可能受损的解释。更重要的是,它首次明确提出 balance,使文章不止停留在反对父母用屏幕的单向批评,而开始形成“回应孩子需求但不要求全天候陪伴”的中间立场。

    用实验锁定回应需求
  4. P4

    The Case for Balanced Parental Screen Use

    Moderate screen use can support parents' well-being and help them be more available to children, so constant interaction should not be demanded.

    本段构成全文的 counterbalance,并最终完成文章主旨中的 complete digital abstinence is unrealistic。它不是否定前文关于互动和情感回应的担忧,而是补充父母也有 self-care 与现实生活需求;由此得出完整结论:关键不在于完全不用 technology,而在于父母能否在使用设备时仍总体保持 responsive,并获得合理的 breaks。

    识别转折后的让步
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

4 道逐段细节自检题

针对2017年考研英语二真题这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 design of digital products Radesky

    What does Radesky suggest about the design of digital products?

    • A They are primarily intended to teach children how to use screens responsibly.
    • B They help parents separate work routines from family life.
    • C They are designed to maximize engagement, making it difficult for parents to disengage from them.
    • D They are created mainly to reduce parents' need for social interaction.
    • E They ensure that parents can devote all their attention to their children.
    • F They are designed to prevent technology from entering family routines.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项完整保留了原文的两级关系:digital products 的设计目标是 maximal engagement,随之产生的结果是 hard to disengage。选项没有把“难以抽离”夸大为“完全不能抽离”,也没有把 family routine 的外溢后果误说成设计者唯一目的。其障碍在于题干只问 design,许多考生会错误排除带有结果 making it difficult 的表述;但原文恰恰用因果链解释这种 design 的实质影响。

    动词链镜像 时间紧张时,直接抓题干中的 design 和 digital products,回扫 第1段 中紧邻引号的动词链 designed、promote、disengage,无须逐句精读全文。随后采用“动词链镜像法”:只检查哪个选项按原顺序保留“设计目标→用户状态”的关系;保留该关系的正确项即可判定为答案项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 food-testing exercise mothers who used devices

    What did Radesky's food-testing exercise reveal about mothers who used devices?

    • A They received more verbal responses from their children during the exercise.
    • B They relied more on nonverbal communication than on verbal communication.
    • C They became more attentive when children made bids for attention.
    • D They initiated markedly fewer verbal and nonverbal interactions with their children.
    • E They used devices less often at mealtimes than expected.
    • F They reduced only the amount of visual contact with their children.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项忠实概括研究结果:主体是 used devices 的 mothers,行为是 initiated interactions,对象是 their children,方向是 fewer,并同时覆盖 verbal 和 nonverbal 两类互动。markedly 没有伪造具体百分比,而是由 20 per cent 与 39 per cent 的数据合理概括。障碍在于原文使用 started,而选项改为 initiated,考查考生识别同义替换的能力。

    四格结果核验 直接以 food-testing exercise 定位 第2段,不必先读 surrounding discussion。采用“四格压缩法”,在草稿上只记 mothers—started interactions—fewer—children,再把正确项放入四格;凡有一格不吻合的选项立即删去,正确项即为答案项。百分比只用于确认 fewer 的强度,不需要逐项计算。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 still face experiment become distressed

    The still face experiment is cited to show that children may become distressed when parents

    • A fail to expose them to a sufficiently large number of words.
    • B leave them alone in order to complete housework.
    • C respond too quickly to every verbal expression of need.
    • D use screens to teach them new information.
    • E offer blank, unresponsive faces and no visual social feedback.
    • F interact with them continuously throughout the day.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    正确项直接整合实验中的关键条件:blank expression、not giving visual social feedback,以及前文的 blank and unresponsive faces。它准确说明儿童 distress 的触发情境,没有将该反应归因于父母离开、批评或完全不使用设备。障碍在于题干把实验结论概括为 when parents,考生需把实验动作转写为一般化的 parental behavior。

    情绪倒推条件 抓住专名 still face experiment,立即进入 第3段;随后不读完整实验故事,只执行“结果倒推”:由 distressed 向前寻找唯一紧邻的 parent manipulation,即面部状态和 feedback 的变化。把这一条件与正确项做同义核对,即可快速判定答案项。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Tronick beneficial

    According to Tronick, parents' use of devices can be beneficial because it may

    • A guarantee that children learn effectively from screens.
    • B eliminate all tension between parents and children.
    • C allow parents to avoid interacting with their children altogether.
    • D replace the need for parents to respond to emotional expressions.
    • E ensure that parents complete all their work before spending time with children.
    • F make parents happier and more available to their children at other times.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    正确项精准复现 Tronick 的限定性推理:父母可用设备联系朋友或处理工作,这 can make them feel happier,继而 lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time。它没有声称儿童直接从屏幕学习,也没有说设备本身必然改善亲子关系。障碍在于 benefit 不是即时发生在 child 身上,而是经由 parent 的情绪和可用性间接实现。

    两跳因果筛选 以 Tronick 在 第4段 中完成人物定位后,跳过其关于 ideology 的长句,直接扫描正向结果词 value、happier、available。然后用“两跳因果法”验证:设备使用先改变 parent 状态,再影响其后的 child availability;唯一完整保留两跳关系的正确项就是答案项。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    父母屏幕使用问题的提出

    这个 opening paragraph 点明了一个被忽视的 issue:当大家都在 focus on 孩子的 screen time 时,parents' own screen use 却被 overlooked 了。Radesky 的 quote 揭示了 digital products 的本质——它们 designed to promote maximal engagement,这就导致 hard to disengage,最终 bleed over into family routine

    作为 introduction,这个 paragraph 为整篇 argument 搭建了 context:既然 tech products 有这么强的 engagement design,父母的 screen use 就成了一个需要 address 的 family issue,为后文探讨 parental screen use 对 parent-child interaction 的 impact 以及如何 balance 做好了铺垫

    提出父母屏幕使用的被忽视现象
  2. 分论点 P2 P3

    父母屏幕使用对亲子互动的负面影响

    这两个 paragraphs 构成了 argument 的第一个 supporting point:parental device use 会 negatively impact parent-child interaction。第2段 提供了 concrete empirical evidence——Radesky's food-testing study 显示 mothers using devices 产生了 significantly fewer verbal and nonverbal interactions。第3段 从 developmental psychology 的角度 explain why this matters:infants are wired to look at parents' faces 来 understand their world,当 faces are blank and unresponsive 时会 extremely disconcerting。Still face experiment 作为 classic evidence 强化了这个 point

    这个 chunk 构建了 argument 的 one side——the negative impact perspective。通过 combine quantitative data(20% fewer verbal interactions)和 psychological theory(still face experiment),它 establish 了为什么 parental screen use 是 concerning 的,为主旨中提到的 'negatively impact parent-child interaction and emotional connection' 提供了 solid evidence base,也为后文的 counterargument 创造了 tension

    呈现父母屏幕使用的弊端证据
  3. 分论点 P4

    父母合理使用屏幕的价值

    这个 paragraph 引入了 counterargument,通过 Tronick 这个 same field 的 expert 来 present a different perspective。他 challenges 前面的 concern,认为对 kids' screen use 的 worries 源于 'oppressive ideology' that demands constant interaction。关键的 turn 是:just because a child isn't learning from the screen doesn't mean there's no value——它能 give parents necessary breaks,让他们 feel happier,从而 be more available to their child the rest of the time。这是一个 pragmatic argument for balance

    这个 chunk 提供了 the other side of the argument,对应主旨中的 'complete digital abstinence is unrealistic' 和 'using technology for necessary breaks and self-care'。它通过 critique the idealistic expectations 和 highlight practical benefits,为 balanced approach 提供了 justification。这个 counterpoint 让整个 argument 从单一的 'screen bad' narrative 转向更 nuanced 的 'balance needed' position

    提供父母使用屏幕的合理性论据
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

4 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 4 步按2017年考研英语二真题 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他考研英语文章。

  1. 首段定位核心问题 P1

    议论文的 opening paragraph 通常会 introduce the topic 并暗示 central concern,这篇文章通过 contrast(children's use vs. parents' use)来 establish focus,Jenny Radesky 的 quote 直接点出了 tech engagement 导致的 family disruption,这是整个 argument 的 starting point

  2. 主体段证据方向 P2 P3

    这两段通过 empirical evidence(Radesky's study, still face experiment)来 substantiate 一个 specific position,即 parental screen use 的 harmful effects。在议论文中,连续的 evidence paragraphs 通常代表 author's primary argument direction 或需要 address 的 major concern

  3. 反方观点引入 P4

    议论文的 balanced argument 通常会 present 一个 counter-perspective,这里 Tronick 挑战了前面段落的 implication,认为 screen use 有 legitimate value(gives parents time, makes them happier)。这个 structural shift 表明文章不是 one-sided critique,而是在 navigate 两种 perspectives

  4. 立场综合定位 P1 P2 P3 P4

    议论文的主旨往往体现在 how the author positions different perspectives,这篇文章通过 juxtapose research evidence 和 practical considerations 来 suggest 一个 nuanced stance。关键是识别 neither...nor structure 的 implicit presence:既不是完全 ban screens(unrealistic),也不是 ignore impacts,而是 maintain balance 和 responsiveness

主旨信号词 balance P3 responsive P3 tension P2 oppressive ideology P4 value P4

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

文章认为,尽管父母使用屏幕设备会对亲子互动和情感联系产生负面影响,但完全戒除数字设备是不现实的。需要一种平衡的方法,即父母在对孩子的需求保持回应的同时,利用科技获得必要的休息和自我照顾。
The article argues that while parental screen use can negatively impact parent-child interaction and emotional connection, complete digital abstinence is unrealistic. A balanced approach is needed where parents remain responsive to children's needs while using technology for necessary breaks and self-care.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进考研英语高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • disengage 脱离、抽身(从某种投入状态中)

    我们先看到tech产品designed to suck you in,目的是promote maximal engagement。这是在描述一个让人深度卷入的过程。然后文章说It makes it hard to do某个动作,这个动作的结果是如果做不到,就会bleed-over into family routine。从这个推理链条看:科技让人高度engaged → 很难执行某个相反动作 → 如果做不到这个动作就会影响家庭生活。那么这个动作必然是脱离engagement的过程。再结合构词法,dis-作为否定前缀加上engage,完美契合了这个逻辑。所以disengage就是从投入状态中抽离、脱离的意思。

    前缀拆解+因果逻辑验证
  • disconcerting 令人不安的、使人困扰的

    首先从situational context入手:infants需要通过parents' faces来understand their world,但得到的是blank and unresponsive faces。这种gap between expectation and reality本身就暗示negative impact。然后文章说这can be extremely disconcerting,这里extremely表明程度很强。紧接着通过still face experiment提供concrete evidence:相同situation导致child becomes increasingly distressed。这个distressed是确凿的negative emotional state。所以disconcerting必然是describing something that causes distress or unease。最后从word structure validation:dis-表否定,破坏某种concert(和谐),导致的就是unease或distress。所有线索converge到同一个meaning。

    情境定性+例证验证+强度标记
  • exquisitely 极其精致地、完美地、过分讲究地

    我们从argumentative structure入手:Radesky说parents don't have to be exquisitely present,but需要balance。这个don't have to...but结构表明exquisitely present是一个不必要的extreme。然后Tronick在下一段elaborate这个观点,批评那种demands parents should always be interacting的oppressive ideology,说它是fantasised和idealized的。两段合起来看,都在反对一种unrealistically high parenting standard。那么exquisitely就是在describing这种达到极致、完美无缺的状态。再看word structure,ex-前缀supporting这个exceeding normal limits的interpretation。所以exquisitely意思是to a perfect degree、in an extremely refined or intense manner。

    论证立场+对比结构+前缀强度
  • oppressive 压迫的、施加过度负担的

    首先识别Tronick的critical tone:他用oppressive来describe某个ideology,然后列举这个ideology的unreasonable demands(always interacting、30,000 words requirement)。这些demands的特点是rigid、guilt-inducing、不考虑parents' actual needs。接着他propose alternative view:parents可以take breaks,这对their well-being有益。这个contrast between oppressive ideology和his own view清楚地show:oppressive是describing something that imposes excessive burdens and denies reasonable freedom。从word structure角度,op- + press的combination也support这个interpretation of pressing against someone。所以oppressive就是具有压迫性的、施加过重负担的。

    作者立场+特征枚举+反向对比
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

5 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 引用论证

    P3

    作者在第三段引用了 developmental psychologist Ed Tronick 在1970年代设计的 "still face experiment"。这个 classic experiment 展示了当 mother 保持 blank expression 且不给 visual social feedback 时,child 会变得 increasingly distressed。这个 authoritative citation 为文章的 core argument 提供了 scientific credibility,证明 parental responsiveness 对 child development 的重要性,从而支持了作者关于 parents 需要 balance screen use 和 meaningful interaction 的主旨。

    信号词 cites according to research shows studies indicate experts suggest as noted by evidence from findings reveal scholar argues data demonstrates

    仿写: 在写作时,首先 identify 你的 main claim,然后寻找 relevant experts 或 landmark studies 来 support 它。引用时要包含三个 key elements:expert's name/credentials、specific finding、connection to your argument。模版:According to [expert + credentials], [specific finding/experiment]. This [demonstrates/suggests/proves] that [link to your thesis]。比如:According to neuroscientist Dr. Smith's 2020 study, prolonged social isolation reduces neural connectivity in adolescents. This demonstrates that in-person interaction remains essential for healthy brain development.

  • 举例论证

    P2

    在第二段,作者描述了 Radesky 的 empirical study,她给 mother-child pairs 一个 food-testing exercise,观察 device use 对 interaction 的 impact。Concrete data 显示 mothers 使用 devices 时,verbal interactions 减少了20%,nonverbal interactions 减少了39%。这个 specific example 用 quantifiable results 将 abstract concern(parental screen use 的 negative impact)变成 tangible evidence,directly supporting 文章关于 screen use 会 disrupt family interaction 和 emotional connection 的核心论点。

    信号词 for example for instance such as in one case consider study shows observation reveals experiment found data indicates

    仿写: 选择 examples 时,优先考虑那些有 specific details 和 measurable outcomes 的 cases。结构上遵循:introduce the example context → present specific details/data → explain how it supports your point。模版:In [researcher's] study of [context], [specific observation + quantifiable data]. This demonstrates that [connection to thesis]。例如:In Chen's 2019 study of remote workers, participants who took structured breaks showed 35% higher productivity and reported 40% less stress. This demonstrates that intentional disconnection actually enhances work quality.

  • 对比论证

    P4

    第四段呈现了 Tronick 对于 screen use concerns 的 contrasting perspective。前三段强调 parental screen use 的 negative impacts,而 Tronick challenges 这个 prevailing view,认为这些 worries 源于 "oppressive ideology"。他提出 alternative viewpoint:screens 可以给 parents necessary breaks,让他们 feel happier,从而 be more available to children。这个 sharp contrast 丰富了文章的 argumentative depth,避免了 one-sided presentation,最终支持了 main thesis 中的 "balanced approach" 概念——既不 completely abstain 也不 overuse。

    信号词 on the other hand however in contrast conversely whereas while but yet alternatively on the contrary

    仿写: 构建对比时,首先 establish 一个 prevailing view 或 common assumption,然后用 contrastive markers 引入 opposing perspective。确保两个 sides 都有 substantive content,不要把 opposing view 当 straw man。模版:While [View A argues X], [Scholar/Evidence] suggests that [View B offers Y]. This tension reveals that [nuanced conclusion]。例如:While traditional education emphasizes memorization and testing, recent cognitive research suggests that project-based learning produces deeper retention and transfer of skills. This tension reveals that effective learning requires balancing foundational knowledge with applied practice.

  • 因果论证

    P3

    第三段建立了清晰的 causal chain:当 parents' faces 变成 blank and unresponsive(因为 absorbed in device),这会对 children 造成 extremely disconcerting 的 effect。文章进一步 trace 这个 causality:infants are wired to look at parents' faces 来 understand their world,所以 lack of responsiveness directly impacts 他们的 emotional security。这个 cause-effect relationship 强化了文章的 central argument,showing 不仅仅是 screen time quantity 的问题,更是 parental responsiveness quality 的问题,supporting 了 main thesis 关于 parents need to be responsive and sensitive 的主张。

    信号词 leads to causes results in because as a result consequently therefore thus due to stems from triggers brings about

    仿写: 构建因果论证时,明确 identify cause、mechanism 和 effect 三个 components。避免 oversimplification,acknowledge potential intervening factors。模版:When [cause/condition], [mechanism/process occurs], leading to [effect/outcome]. This is because [underlying reason]。例如:When students receive immediate feedback on assignments, they can identify misconceptions while the material is still fresh, leading to deeper learning and better long-term retention. This is because timely correction prevents the consolidation of incorrect understanding into long-term memory.

  • 比喻修辞

    P1

    第一段中 Radesky 使用了 "suck you in" 这个 vivid metaphor 来形容 technology 的 engaging nature,以及 "bleed-over" 来描述 digital engagement 如何 spill into family routine。这些 figurative expressions 把 abstract concept(technology's addictive design)变成 concrete, physical imagery——"suck" 暗示 irresistible force,"bleed-over" 暗示 unwanted spillage。这些 metaphors 让 readers viscerally feel technology's intrusive nature,making the argument about screen use's negative impact more immediate and relatable,supporting main thesis about the difficulty of achieving balance。

    信号词 like as metaphorically figuratively symbolizes represents embodies

    仿写: 选择 metaphors 时,pick images that your readers can easily visualize 并且 emotionally connect with。确保 metaphor 的 connotations align with your argument's tone。模版:[Abstract concept] is described as [concrete image/action] to convey [intended emotional/conceptual association]。例如:Social media algorithms are described as "echo chambers" to convey how they trap users in self-reinforcing bubbles of similar viewpoints. 或:Information overload is portrayed as "drowning in data" to emphasize the overwhelming, suffocating feeling of too much unfiltered content。

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

6 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 科技产品设计的成瘾性暗示过度使用的不可避免

    P1
    Tech is designed to really suck you in, and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage

    隐喻类强化表达 designed to really suck you in suck you in hook you draw you in pull you in trap you capture your attention

    这个 implication 为整篇文章的 thesis 奠定了 foundation。通过强调 technology 的 addictive design,作者 preemptively 回应了对 parents 的 potential criticism,暗示 parental distraction 并非 moral failing 而是 design consequence。这为后文 Tronick 提出的 balanced approach 和 realistic expectations 铺垫,支撑了 main argument 中关于 parents 需要 self-care time 的 justification

  • 量化数据揭示互动质量的显著损失

    P2
    mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 per cent fewer verbal and 39 per cent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children

    数据对比类 20 per cent fewer... 39 per cent fewer per cent fewer per cent less times more likely fold increase significantly lower measurably reduced

    这组 data 的 implication 是非语言 interaction 的 disproportionate decline 揭示了 emotional attunement 的深层 disruption。39% 的 drop 暗示 parents 不仅少说话,更关键的是 miss 了 children 的 emotional cues。这强化了文章 thesis 中关于 responsiveness 和 emotional need 的 central concern,为 第3段 中的 still face experiment 提供 empirical foundation,同时也为 balanced approach 的 necessity 提供 quantitative justification

  • 历史实验类比暗示当前行为的严重性

    P3
    if those faces are blank and unresponsive – as they often are when absorbed in a device – it can be extremely disconcerting for the children

    情态词强化类 extremely disconcerting deeply troubling highly problematic profoundly disturbing seriously concerning particularly alarming exceptionally worrying

    这个 implication 是文章 argument 的 emotional peak,通过将 parental distraction 与 psychological experiment 相 parallel,作者 maximize 了 concern 的 legitimacy。但这也为 第4段 的 counter-argument 设置了 opening - Tronick 正是 challenge 这种 equation 的 validity。这个 言外之意 对 thesis 的作用是 establish 问题的 seriousness,但同时也 create tension 需要 resolution,最终指向 balanced approach 而非 absolute prohibition

  • 引号暗示对主流观点的质疑和讽刺

    P4
    the worries about kids' use of screens are born out of an 'oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting' with their children: 'It's based on a somewhat fantasised, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology'

    贬义标签类 oppressive ideology unrealistic expectations fantasised ideal problematic narrative harmful myth misguided belief flawed assumption

    这个 dramatic reversal 的 implication 是 reframe 整个 debate。Tronick 暗示前面的 concerns 并非 universal truths 而是 culturally specific 和 class-bound expectations。这为文章的 final position 铺路:既不是 ignore parental screen use 的 impacts,也不是 adopt unrealistic standards,而是 recognize 父母也需要 breaks 的 legitimacy。这个 counter-narrative 对 thesis 的作用是 introduce nuance 和 complexity,最终支持 balanced approach 的 conclusion

  • 双重否定暗示有条件的价值认可

    P4
    just because a child isn't learning from the screen doesn't mean there's no value to it – particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break

    双重否定让步类 doesn't mean there's no value doesn't mean there's no not without merit can't say there's no doesn't necessarily lack not entirely without isn't completely devoid of

    这个 carefully hedged statement 的 implication 是 redefine screen time 的 value proposition - 不是 for children's benefit 而是 for parental wellbeing,从而 indirectly benefit children。这 subtle shift 是文章 thesis 的 cornerstone:parents 的 self-care 最终 enables 更好的 availability。这个 言外之意 reconcile 了前面的 concerns 与 realistic parenting needs,支持 balanced approach 的 conclusion 而非 either/or binary

  • 因果链条暗示间接益处的合理性

    P4
    This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time

    因果关系推理类 which lets them which enables them to which allows them to thereby making them thus helping them which in turn leading them to be

    这个 concluding logic 的 implication 是将文章 bring to synthesis。通过建立 parental breaks → happiness → better parenting 的 causal chain,作者 resolve 了前面的 tension between screen concerns 和 realistic needs。这 directly support 文章 thesis 的 balanced approach:不是 zero screen time for parents,而是 strategic use 配合 overall responsiveness。最终 message 是 quality matters more than quantity,occasional disconnection 可以 enhance 而非 undermine overall connection

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( Balanced and Nuanced)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 双方观点平等呈现 P1 P2 P3 P4

    在 argumentative writing 中,如果作者 equally 呈现 opposing viewpoints 而没有 immediately dismiss 任何一方,这通常 signal 一个 balanced attitude。作者用了 equal space 来 present both sides,这是 neutrality 的 key indicator。

  2. 对比转折标记词定位 P4

    Transition phrases like 'On the other hand' 或 'However' 在 argumentative essays 中是 crucial indicators。它们 reveal 作者是在 building a dialectical argument 而不是 one-sided advocacy。这种 signposting 表明作者 acknowledges complexity 而非 pushing a single agenda。

  3. 专家观点平行呈现 P2 P3 P4

    在 academic writing 中,如果作者 merely reports what experts say 而不加 evaluative language(如 'correctly points out', 'mistakenly believes'),这 demonstrates objectivity。作者让 experts speak for themselves,这是 neutral reporting 的 characteristic feature。

  4. 结论性立场缺失 P4

    议论文的 conclusion 或 final paragraph 往往 reveal 作者的 ultimate position。这篇文章 doesn't end with phrases like 'Therefore, we should...' 或 'It is clear that...'。Instead,它以一个 expert's view 结束而没有 authorial synthesis,这 maintains the balanced tone throughout。

  5. 结构-转折-归属-结论四维判定 P1 P2 P3 P4

    这个 comprehensive approach 之所以 effective,是因为它 combines structural analysis with linguistic markers。议论文的 attitude 不是从 isolated words 判断,而是从 overall architecture 和 discourse patterns。当 structural balance + explicit transitions + neutral reporting 三者 align,作者的 balanced attitude 就 undeniable。

文中的态度信号词

  • On the other hand P4

    这个 transitional phrase 是 balanced argumentation 的 textbook marker。它 explicitly signals 作者在 introducing a contrasting perspective with equal weight。在议论文中,'On the other hand' typically introduces a legitimate alternative view 而不是一个 strawman argument to be knocked down。Its placement at the paragraph opening gives prominence to Tronick's counter-view。

    同类词 However Conversely By contrast Meanwhile Nevertheless

  • found P2

    'Found' 是 neutral reporting verb,表示作者在 objectively presenting research results。它 contrast 明显地 with evaluative verbs like 'proved' or 'confirmed'。这个 verb choice 表明作者 maintains distance from the findings,neither endorsing nor critiquing them,只是 presenting them as evidence for readers to evaluate。

    同类词 observed noted recorded documented showed

  • concerned P4

    'Concerned' 出现在 attributing Tronick's view('Tronick himself is concerned that...'),但这里作者在 reporting Tronick's concern about OTHER people's worries。这是 nested attribution - the worry being discussed belongs to those who oppose screen use,not to Tronick or the author。This layered structure 让作者 maintain even more distance,showing sophisticated neutrality。

    同类词 worried anxious troubled uneasy apprehensive

  • can P4

    The modal verb 'can' appears in 'This can make them feel happier',expressing possibility rather than certainty。在 academic argumentation,modals 表示 tentative claims rather than absolute assertions。作者 could have written 'This makes them...'(definitive),但 chose 'can make'(contingent),showing careful avoidance of overstatement and maintaining a measured tone。

    同类词 may might could potentially possibly

  • says P1

    'Says' 是 most neutral attribution verb,appearing in 'says Jenny Radesky' 和 'says Radesky'(第3段)以及 'he says'(第4段)。作者 uses the same neutral verb to introduce BOTH experts' views,ensuring equal treatment。这种 consistent neutrality in verb choice 是 balanced reporting 的 linguistic fingerprint。

    同类词 states notes comments mentions observes

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他考研英语 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开头提出争议话题 P1

    第1段 通过 'it's easy for parents to forget' 和 Jenny Radesky 的 quote 引入了 parents' screen use 这个 controversial topic,暗示这是一个需要 explore 的 issue。说明文会直接 explain 'what is screen use',新闻报道会直接 report 'parents forget to monitor their screen time' 这样的 specific event。

  2. 呈现对立观点 P2 P3 P4

    第2段 和 第3段 展示了 Radesky 的 research findings 和 concerns about parents' device use 的 negative effects。但 第4段 明确用 'On the other hand' 引入了 Tronick 的 opposing view,认为这些 worries 源于 'oppressive ideology'。这种 contrasting perspectives 是议论文的 hallmark,说明文只会 present one authoritative explanation,新闻报道会 report events 而非 debate viewpoints。

  3. 用证据构建论证 P2 P3

    第2段 detailed 描述了 Radesky 的 empirical study ('giving mother-child pairs a food-testing exercise', '20 per cent fewer verbal interactions'),第3段 引用了 'still face experiment' 作为 theoretical support。这些都是用来 substantiate 她的 argument about negative impacts。说明文会用 examples 来 illustrate concepts,但不会构建 argumentation chain;新闻报道会 present facts 但不会进行 deep analytical reasoning。

  4. 引导读者思辨 P1 P2 P3 P4

    整篇文章的 purpose 不是 simply inform readers about screen use facts,而是让读者 weigh the pros and cons of parental screen use。第1段-3 present concerns,第4段 challenges those concerns,forcing readers to consider: 'Is parental screen use really harmful?' 这种 evaluative purpose 是议论文的本质。说明文的 purpose 是 'help readers understand how something works',新闻报道是 'inform about what happened'。

  5. 四维特征综合 P1 P2 P3 P4

    本文完全 fit 这个 pattern: 开头提出 parents' screen use 这个 controversial issue,中间 present Radesky 的 negative view 和 Tronick 的 opposing view,用 empirical studies 作为 evidence,overall purpose 是让读者 critically evaluate 这个 issue。相比之下,说明文会是 'Screen use affects families in these ways (single authoritative explanation)',新闻报道会是 'New study shows parents use screens too much (event-focused reporting)'。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • it's easy for parents to forget P1 观点引导词 it's easy to it's hard to it's important to it's necessary to it's crucial to
  • says Jenny Radesky P1 观点引导词 says argues believes suggests contends
  • can be extremely disconcerting P3 立场表态词 can be extremely may be highly is particularly problematic proves to be detrimental tends to be harmful
  • On the other hand P4 论证逻辑连接词 However Nevertheless Yet Conversely In contrast
  • is concerned that P4 立场表态词 worries that fears that is skeptical that doubts that questions whether
  • doesn't mean P4 论证逻辑连接词 doesn't necessarily imply this doesn't suggest it doesn't follow that one cannot conclude that we shouldn't assume that
  • believes that P4 观点引导词 thinks that holds that maintains that is convinced that takes the view that
  • can make them feel P4 论证逻辑连接词 can make may lead to could result in might cause tends to produce
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

7 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 的常见问题

2017年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 的原文出自哪里?
The Independent《独立报》2016年6月7日一篇题为 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?(在智能手机和平板电脑上花太多时间会损害孩子的成长发展吗?)的文章。
2017年考研英语二真题文章 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 的主旨是什么?
2017年考研英语二真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 认为,尽管父母使用屏幕设备会对亲子互动和情感联系产生负面影响,但完全戒除数字设备是不现实的。需要一种平衡的方法,即父母在对孩子的需求保持回应的同时,利用科技获得必要的休息和自我照顾。(英文表述:The article argues that while parental screen use can negatively impact parent-child interaction and emotional connection, complete digital abstinence is unrealistic. A balanced approach is needed where parents remain responsive to children's needs while using technology for necessary breaks and self-care.)
Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development?(2017年考研英语二真题文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是客观中立(Balanced and Nuanced)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 424 词、4 段;在考研英语二全部 94 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 72 篇(占 77%)。
2017年考研英语二真题文章 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 4 段按议论文骨架分为 3 个意群:引言 · 第1段——父母屏幕使用问题的提出;分论点 · 第2段、第3段——父母屏幕使用对亲子互动的负面影响;分论点 · 第4段——父母合理使用屏幕的价值。
Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(Balanced and Nuanced)。判断路径:双方观点平等呈现 → 对比转折标记词定位 → 专家观点平行呈现 → 结论性立场缺失 → 结构-转折-归属-结论四维判定;文中的态度信号词包括 On the other hand(第4段)、found(第2段)、concerned(第4段)、can(第4段)、says(第1段)。
2017年考研英语二真题文章 Does spending too much time on smart phones and tablets damage kids'development? 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:disengage(脱离、抽身(从某种投入状态中))、disconcerting(令人不安的、使人困扰的)、exquisitely(极其精致地、完美地、过分讲究地)、oppressive(压迫的、施加过度负担的),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: