2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)
CET-6 · 来自 2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 · Part II Section C (2) · 听力

2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2)

议论文 · 听力 · 真题文章逐层精读

本页是 2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 398 词、6 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

6 段英文原文

以下为2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的听力原文,共 6 段。左侧 P1–P6 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

"Stereotype" may sound like a bad word, but there's nothing bad about it. For one thing, stereotypes are often accurate. When you ask people about their concept of stereotypes, they get it pretty much right.

Also, stereotypes are often positive, particularly of groups that we ourselves belong to. Some of the statistical generalizations may be positive as some groups have reputations for being smart, for being loyal, for being brave, for all sorts of things that are not at all negative. And so there's nothing inherently wrong about stereotypes.

But there are problems with stereotypes. For one thing, they're reliable insofar as they're based on unbiased samples. But a lot of the information we get about human groups is through biased sources like how they're represented in the media. And if these sources don't give you an accurate depiction, your stereotype won't be accurate.

For example, many Jews have been troubled by Shakespeare's depiction of Shylock. If the only Jew you know is Shakespeare's Shylock, it's going to be a very bad impression. So one problem with stereotypes is while we are good at drawing conclusions from them, often our information isn't reliable.

A second problem is that stereotypes, regardless of whether or not they're accurate, can have a negative effect on the people that they apply to. And this is what psychologist, Claude Steele, described as stereotype threat. He has a vivid example of this. Here's how to make African-Americans do worse on a math test. You have the test and you put on the test that they have to identify their race. The very act of acknowledging that they are African-American when given a test ignites in them thoughts of their own stereotype which is negative regarding academics and that makes them do worse. Want to know how to make a woman do worse on a math test? Same thing, get her to write down her sex.

One recent study found a sort of clever twist on this. When Asian-American women are given a test and they're asked to mark down their race, they do better than they would otherwise do. They're reminded of a positive stereotype that boosts their morale. You ask them, on the other hand, to mark down their sex, they do worse because they're reminded of a negative stereotype. That's an example of how stereotypes have a potentially damaging effect on people.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

6 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Defending Stereotypes: Accuracy Over Stigma

    Stereotypes are not inherently negative and are often accurate reflections of reality.

    这个 opening paragraph 在整篇 article 中起到 establish baseline understanding 的作用。通过 challenge the negative connotation of stereotypes,作者为后续 discuss their complexity 打下 foundation。这个 paragraph 对应文章主旨中的 'not inherently bad and often accurate' 部分,是 thesis 的 first supporting pillar。它 set the tone for balanced analysis,防止 readers 陷入 black-and-white thinking。

    找转折词后的核心观点
  2. P2

    The Positive Face of Stereotypes

    Stereotypes can be positive, especially for in-groups, encompassing virtues like intelligence and loyalty.

    这个 paragraph 在 article structure 中 continue building the defense of stereotypes,对应文章主旨的 'often positive' 部分。它和 第1段 together 形成 two-pronged argument:stereotypes are both true and good。这种 cumulative argumentation 为后面 introduce problems 做 necessary groundwork — 只有 fully establish the benefits 后,the problems 才显得 significant and balanced。这体现了 sophisticated argumentation strategy。

    识别并列论证的新维度
  3. P3

    The First Problem: Information Bias

    Stereotypes become problematic when based on biased information sources like media rather than accurate samples.

    这个 paragraph 是 article 的 structural pivot,对应文章主旨的 'two main problems' 的 first one。它的作用是 introduce complexity and nuance to previous defense,showing that author 不是 blind advocate 而是 critical thinker。通过 acknowledge limitations,作者 strengthen overall credibility。这个 paragraph 建立了 'information reliability' 这个 criterion,为 next paragraph 的 concrete example 提供 analytical framework。

    识别转折后的问题陈述
  4. P4

    Case Study: The Shylock Effect

    Biased sources like Shakespeare's Shylock can create distorted stereotypes when people lack diverse exposure.

    这个 paragraph 是 第3段 的 concrete elaboration,通过 specific example 来 demonstrate 前面提到的 information bias problem。它对应文章主旨中 'rely on potentially biased information sources' 的部分。这个 example 的作用不仅是 illustration,还通过 culturally resonant reference (Shakespeare) 来 engage readers emotionally,making the argument more compelling than pure abstraction would be。

    从具体案例提取一般原则
  5. P5

    The Second Problem: Stereotype Threat in Action

    Stereotype threat, where awareness of negative stereotypes impairs performance, is the second major problem with stereotypes.

    这个 paragraph introduce the second major problem,对应文章主旨中 'negatively impact individuals through stereotype threat' 的核心内容。它的作用是 shift focus from information quality (第3段-4) to psychological impact。这个 paragraph 特别重要因为它 introduces empirical research evidence,提升了 argument 的 credibility from opinion to science-backed claim。The multiple examples (African-Americans and women) show the breadth of this phenomenon。

    结构化识别概念-机制-效果
  6. P6

    The Dual Edge: Positive and Negative Stereotype Effects

    Research on Asian-American women shows stereotypes can both boost and harm performance depending on which identity is primed.

    这个 concluding paragraph 对应文章主旨中 stereotype threat 的部分,但 adds important nuance by showing bidirectional effects。它的作用是 prevent oversimplification — stereotypes 不是 purely harmful,their effect depends on content and context。这个 paragraph 和 第5段 together 形成 complete picture of stereotype threat phenomenon,showing both negative and positive manifestations。通过 end on concrete research example,作者 leaves readers with memorable, evidence-based understanding of the issue。

    对比条件下的效果差异
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

6 道逐段细节自检题

针对2017年12月英语六级真题第2套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 concept of what stereotypes are understand correctly

    What do people generally understand correctly about stereotypes?

    • A They believe stereotypes are always harmful.
    • B They can identify the ethnic origins of stereotypes.
    • C They have a largely accurate concept of what stereotypes are.
    • D They know how to eliminate stereotypes from society.
    • E They recognize that all stereotypes are based on science.
    • F They agree that stereotypes should be avoided in public discussion.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项完整复现了 people、concept 与 pretty much right 三层信息。largely 对应 pretty much,accurate 对应 right,what stereotypes are 对应 concept of stereotypes,属于典型的等义改写。障碍在于选项没有复用原文的 get it right,考生必须识别 concept 与理解对象之间的逻辑关系。

    双义同段锁定 时间紧张时,直接把题干切成 concept 与 understand correctly 两个检索块,在 第1段 寻找“认知对象加认知准确性”的邻近搭配。不要逐项翻译六个选项;先用范围词排除含 always、all、should 的选项,再检查正确项是否是对原句的最短同义压缩。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 inherently wrong positive generalizations about groups

    Why does the author say that stereotypes are not inherently wrong?

    • A All stereotypes accurately predict individual behavior.
    • B Most groups prefer to be described by stereotypes.
    • C The media usually presents groups in a favorable way.
    • D Some stereotypes are positive generalizations about groups.
    • E Negative stereotypes have no effect on academic performance.
    • F People naturally reject positive descriptions of their own groups.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项概括了 positive、statistical generalizations 以及 groups 的信息,并准确回答 Why:正面类型的存在使“本质上错误”的绝对判断不能成立。障碍在于原文列出 smart、loyal、brave,正确项将多个 example 提炼为 generalizations,要求考生完成归纳。

    因果代入验句 直接检索 第2段 中的 inherently wrong,然后从该结论句向前倒读两句,专找带 positive 的名词中心。随后采用“理由替换”法:将每个选项放入结论后的 because 槽位;只有正确项能形成完整且与原文一致的因果关系。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 inaccurate biased sources

    What can make a stereotype inaccurate?

    • A Using large and unbiased samples.
    • B Focusing on positive traits such as loyalty and bravery.
    • C Asking test takers to identify their race.
    • D Belonging to a group with a positive reputation.
    • E Reliance on biased sources that misrepresent human groups.
    • F Recognizing a stereotype before making a decision.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项保留了 biased sources 与 inaccurate depiction 两个因果节点。reliance on 概括了信息经由来源获得的过程,misrepresent 对应 do not give an accurate depiction。障碍在于答案没有照抄 if 结构,而将条件链压缩成名词短语。

    结果句左溯 在 第3段 先扫描 accurate 的相关表达,不从段首开始逐词精读。锁定表示结果的 won't be accurate 后,立即向左回溯其条件从句,提取 source 的性质;再以“原因必须能造成该结果”过滤选项,正确项会保留来源偏差与呈现失真两个组件。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Shylock

    What does the example of Shylock illustrate?

    • A Literary characters are more reliable than real people.
    • B Shakespeare intended to provide a balanced account of Jewish life.
    • C Negative stereotypes are always historically false.
    • D People should avoid reading works by Shakespeare.
    • E Group members are unable to recognize harmful stereotypes.
    • F Limited and unrepresentative portrayals can create a distorted impression of a group.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    limited 对应 the only,unrepresentative 对应单一角色不能代表整个群体,distorted impression 对应 very bad impression。该项从人物案例上升为群体信息失真的普遍规律。障碍在于原文并未直接使用 limited 或 distorted,考生需要完成由条件到抽象结论的推理。

    案例三格压缩 先凭 Shylock 秒定位 第4段,再执行“条件、对象、后果”三格压缩。无需逐句翻译 Shakespeare 背景;把案例中的限制条件、认知对象与结果分别抽象化,再与选项匹配,正确项应完整保留三者之间的因果关系。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 African-American stereotype threat

    How can a math test trigger stereotype threat among African-American test takers?

    • A By requiring them to identify their race on the test.
    • B By telling them that the test measures their intelligence.
    • C By asking them to report their sex.
    • D By reminding them of a positive academic stereotype.
    • E By using an unbiased sample of test takers.
    • F By giving them more difficult math questions.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    By requiring 对应 How can 的操作性问法,identify their race 精确对应实验操控,on the test 也忠实保留了操作发生的具体场景。障碍在于原文随后解释 negative academic thoughts 和 do worse,考生容易错选中间心理过程或最后结果,而忽略题目要的是初始操作。

    首个操作优先 直接在 第5段 以 African-American 找到实验段,然后跳读到紧随其后的 identify 操作,不要被 Claude Steele 的定义和结果解释拖慢。采用“首个可执行动作”规则:How 问触发方式时,正确项通常是实验者能直接执行的 intervention,而不是受试者产生的 thought 或 score。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 Asian-American women mark down their sex

    What happened when Asian-American women were asked to mark down their sex on a test?

    • A They performed better because their morale was boosted.
    • B They performed worse because a negative stereotype about women was activated.
    • C Their performance remained unchanged because the test was fair.
    • D They refused to complete the test after identifying their sex.
    • E They became less aware of gender stereotypes.
    • F They produced more accurate stereotypes about other groups.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    performed worse 对应 do worse,because 衔接了被提醒到 negative stereotype 的解释,about women 由 sex 条件自然限定。该项既回答结果,也保留原因。障碍在于同段先出现 mark down race 后 do better,命题人利用相邻但方向相反的信息检验条件配对能力。

    对照右邻取果 在 第6段 不必完整阅读研究说明,直接用 sex 定位 on the other hand 后的分句,并执行“右邻结果”读取:条件短语后最近的表现动词就是答案方向。接着用 race 条件的反向结果作交叉排除,因此正确项应与 sex 条件同侧,并在方向上区别于 race 条件的结果。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

3 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1 P2

    刻板印象并非坏事

    作者开篇就 challenge 了常见观念,指出 stereotype 这个词 sounds bad 但实际 nothing bad about it,并给出两个 supporting reasons:第一是 stereotypes are often accurate,人们对 stereotypes 的 concept 基本正确;第二是 stereotypes 往往是 positive 的,特别是关于 our own groups 的评价,比如 smart、loyal、brave 这些 traits 都不是 negative 的。

    这个 introductory part 建立了讨论的 foundation,先承认 stereotypes 有其 positive aspects 和 accuracy,为后文转向 problems 做好 contrast 和 balance,体现了 argumentative writing 中典型的 acknowledge-then-refute 策略。

    提出刻板印象的积极面
  2. 分论点 P3 P4

    问题一:信息来源的偏见

    作者提出第一个 problem with stereotypes:它们的 reliability 取决于 sample 是否 unbiased,但现实中 a lot of information 来自 biased sources 比如 media representation,如果这些 sources 不能给出 accurate depiction,那 stereotype 就会 inaccurate。第4段 用 Shakespeare's Shylock 作为 vivid example 来 illustrate 这个 point,说如果 the only Jew you know 是 Shylock,就会形成 very bad impression,所以问题在于虽然 we are good at drawing conclusions,但 our information isn't reliable。

    这个 section 展开了 main argument 的第一个 critical point,通过 problem-example pattern 来 demonstrate 为什么 stereotypes 尽管 inherently not bad,却在 practice 中出现 issues。第3段 提出 theoretical problem,第4段 提供 concrete evidence,两段形成 claim-support structure,让读者理解 biased information 如何 compromise stereotypes 的 validity。

    揭示信息源偏差问题
  3. 分论点 P5 P6

    问题二:刻板印象威胁效应

    作者引入第二个 problem:stereotypes 无论 accurate 与否,都可能对 the people that they apply to 产生 negative effect,这就是心理学家 Claude Steele 描述的 stereotype threat。第5段 通过 African-Americans 和 women 在 math test 上的 performance 来 illustrate,当被要求 identify their race or sex 时,他们会被 ignite 关于 their own stereotype 的 thoughts,从而 do worse。第6段 提供了一个 clever twist:Asian-American women 被要求 mark down race 时表现 better(因为 positive stereotype),mark down sex 时表现 worse(因为 negative stereotype),这个 example 展示了 stereotypes 如何 have a potentially damaging effect。

    这个 concluding body section 完成了 argument 的第二个 critical dimension,从 information bias 转向 psychological impact。通过引入 Claude Steele 的 research 和 multiple experimental examples,作者 substantiate 了 stereotype threat 这个 phenomenon,让 argument 从 epistemological concern(知识来源问题)延伸到 practical consequence(实际影响),使整个 critique 更加 comprehensive and persuasive。

    论证心理威胁机制
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 开篇立场识别 P1 P2

    议论文的 first few paragraphs 通常会 present 作者的 basic position 或者 introduce 一个 common misconception,这为理解整体 argument 提供了 foundation。在本文中,第1段 直接指出 'there's nothing bad about' stereotypes,第2段 用 'Also' 继续补充 positive aspects,这两段共同 establish 了作者要先 acknowledge 的 starting point

  2. 转折词后重点 P3

    议论文的 main thesis 往往出现在 concession 之后的 counter-argument 部分。本文在 第3段 用 'But there are problems' 引出 central concern,这个 turn 标志着从 background information 转向 main argument

  3. 并列结构识别 P2 P3 P5

    当作者使用 enumeration markers 来 organize arguments 时,这些 parallel structures 往往 constitute 文章的 main points。本文在 第2段 用 'Also' 连接第二个 positive aspect,在 第3段 用 'For one thing' 引出第一个 problem,在 第5段 用 'A second problem' 引出第二个 problem,这些 markers 清晰地 outline 了文章的 structure 和 key points

  4. 例证反向追溯 P4 P5 P6

    Examples 不是 thesis 本身,而是用来 substantiate main argument 的 supporting material。本文中 Shakespeare's Shylock (第4段) 和 Claude Steele's research (第5段-6) 都是用来 demonstrate 前面提出的 two problems,这 confirms 那些 problems 就是文章的 main points

  5. 多层论点整合 P1 P2 P3 P5

    议论文的 complete thesis 通常包含 multiple layers:acknowledgment of complexity + identification of problems/solutions。本文的 thesis 就体现了这种 structure:承认 stereotypes 的 positive aspects,但 focus on two main problems。这种 nuanced position 才是文章的 full main idea

主旨信号词 but P3 problems P3 a second problem P5 negative effect P5 stereotype threat P5

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

刻板印象本身并非坏事,往往准确或积极,但存在两个主要问题:它们依赖可能有偏见的信息来源,并且会通过刻板印象威胁对个体产生负面影响,即对刻板印象的意识会损害表现。
Stereotypes are not inherently bad and are often accurate or positive, but they pose two main problems: they rely on potentially biased information sources, and they can negatively impact individuals through stereotype threat, where awareness of stereotypes impairs performance.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • insofar 在...的范围内;就...而言;只要

    我们先看 sentence structure:but 引出转折,说 stereotypes are reliable,然后 insofar 连接一个 as clause。这个 syntactic pattern 提示我们 insofar 在设定一个 condition。再看 context:后面的句子解释说 information 来自 biased sources 时就不 accurate,这证实了 reliable 是有条件的。最后从 word formation 看,in-so-far 三个 components 都与 degree 有关。把这三条 clues 整合起来,insofar 应该表达'在...范围内'或'只要...就'的 conditional meaning,它限定了前面 reliable 这个 claim 的适用范围。

    句法定位+逻辑关系+构词验证
  • ignite 点燃;激起;引发

    我们从 causal structure 入手:identifying race → ignites thoughts → worse performance。这个 chain 告诉我们 ignite 描述的是一个 triggering action。然后看 rhetorical context:作者要解释为什么 simple act 能产生 dramatic effect,所以选用的 verb 必须 convey intensity。最后通过 parallel structure 对比:ignite 比 remind 更 powerful。综合这些 clues,ignite 应该表达'点燃、激发'这样强烈而突然的 activation,就像 fire 被点燃一样。

    因果定位+强度校准+隐喻还原
  • depiction 描绘;描述;刻画

    我们先从 possessive structure 看:Shakespeare's depiction 说明这是 Shakespeare 创作的 something。然后看 collocation:accurate depiction 说明它是可以被评判 accuracy 的 representation。最后看 morphology:-tion suffix 表明这是个表示 action result 的 noun。把这些 pieces 拼起来:depiction 是 creator 对 subject 进行 portrayal 或 description 的 product,可以准确也可以不准确,就像 painting 或 description 一样。

    句法功能+搭配窄化+构词确认
  • morale 士气;信心;精神状态

    我们从 causal chain 入手:positive stereotype → boosts morale → better performance,这确立了 morale 作为 mediating variable 的 role。然后通过 contrastive structure 看到 morale 与 negative thoughts 对应,都是 internal mental states 但方向相反。最后从 verb collocation 确认:boost 这个 verb 通常提升的是 confidence、spirit 类的 positive states。综合这些 clues,morale 应该指'士气、信心、精神状态',是影响 performance 的关键 psychological factor。

    因果定位+对比定性+搭配精确
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

9 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P4

    作者通过 Shakespeare's Shylock 这个 vivid example 来 illustrate stereotype 的第一个 problem。如果你对 Jews 的 impression 全部来自 Shylock 这个 negative character,那么你的 stereotype 就会 inaccurate and biased。这个 concrete example 让抽象的 biased sources 概念变得 tangible,directly supports 文章关于 stereotypes rely on potentially biased information 的 main point。

    信号词 For example For instance Take...as an example Consider A case in point is To illustrate Such as Like

    仿写: 当你要 argue 一个 abstract concept 时,think about:能否找到一个 specific case 让 readers instantly understand?写作时采用 'For example' 或 'take...as an instance' 引入,然后 describe 这个 case 的 key details,最后 explicitly connect 回你的 main argument。模版:'For example, [具体案例描述]. If [案例中的条件], [产生的结果]. This demonstrates that [回扣论点].'

  • 举例论证

    P5

    作者用 Claude Steele 的 research 作为 empirical example 来 demonstrate stereotype threat 这个 second problem。通过 African-Americans on math tests 和 women on math tests 这两个 parallel examples,作者 vividly illustrates 即使 stereotypes 本身 accurate 与否,awareness of them 都会 trigger negative psychological effects,directly 支撑文章关于 stereotypes can negatively impact individuals 的 core argument。

    信号词 For example For instance Take...as an example Consider A case in point is To illustrate Such as Like Here's how One study found

    仿写: 当你要 argue 一个 abstract concept 时,think about:能否找到一个 specific case 让 readers instantly understand?写作时采用 'For example' 或 'take...as an instance' 引入,然后 describe 这个 case 的 key details,最后 explicitly connect 回你的 main argument。模版:'For example, [具体案例描述]. If [案例中的条件], [产生的结果]. This demonstrates that [回扣论点].'

  • 举例论证

    P6

    作者通过 Asian-American women 在 test 中的 performance 作为 additional example,展示 stereotype threat 的 nuanced nature。这个 clever twist 的 case 说明同一个 group 可能受到 positive stereotype (race) 的 boost 或 negative stereotype (sex) 的 harm,具体取决于 which identity is activated。这个 example reinforces 前文的 argument,同时 adds complexity 到对 stereotype effects 的 understanding。

    信号词 For example For instance Take...as an example Consider A case in point is To illustrate Such as Like One study found Research shows Studies indicate

    仿写: 当你要 argue 一个 abstract concept 时,think about:能否找到一个 specific case 让 readers instantly understand?写作时采用 'For example' 或 'take...as an instance' 引入,然后 describe 这个 case 的 key details,最后 explicitly connect 回你的 main argument。模版:'For example, [具体案例描述]. If [案例中的条件], [产生的结果]. This demonstrates that [回扣论点].'

  • 对比论证

    P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    作者在整个 text 中 systematically contrasts stereotypes 的 positive aspects (accurate, often positive) 和 problems (biased sources, negative effects)。开头两段 establish stereotypes 的 benefits,然后从第三段开始用 'But' transition 到 problems。这种 sharp contrast 让 readers 看到 issue 的 complexity 和 nuance,supports 文章的 balanced view:stereotypes not inherently bad but problematic in certain contexts。

    信号词 But However On the other hand In contrast Conversely While Whereas Yet Nevertheless

    仿写: 写作时 identify 你 topic 的 two contrasting dimensions。先 present 一面(通常是 commonly accepted view 或 positive side),用 transition words 如 'but'、'however'、'on the other hand' 引入 contrasting perspective。确保 both sides 都有 sufficient evidence support。模版:'[论点A及其论据]. But/However, [论点B及其论据]. This contrast reveals that [更深层的洞察].'

  • 对比论证

    P6

    作者在第六段 within the same example 进行 micro-level contrast:Asian-American women 被 reminded of race 时 perform better,被 reminded of sex 时 perform worse。这个 within-group contrast 非常 powerful,因为它 controls for individual differences,purely 展示 stereotype activation 的 differential effects。这种 precise contrast 强化了 stereotype threat 的 causality,makes the argument particularly convincing。

    信号词 But However On the other hand In contrast Conversely While Whereas Yet Nevertheless

    仿写: 写作时 identify 你 topic 的 two contrasting dimensions。先 present 一面(通常是 commonly accepted view 或 positive side),用 transition words 如 'but'、'however'、'on the other hand' 引入 contrasting perspective。确保 both sides 都有 sufficient evidence support。模版:'[论点A及其论据]. But/However, [论点B及其论据]. This contrast reveals that [更深层的洞察].'

  • 因果论证

    P3

    作者在第三段 establishes a causal chain:biased information sources → inaccurate depiction → inaccurate stereotype。这个 logical progression 解释了为什么 stereotypes 会 become problematic,directly supports 文章关于 stereotypes rely on biased information 的 first main problem。Clear causality 让 argument 具有 logical necessity。

    信号词 Because Since As a result Therefore Thus Consequently This leads to Due to Owing to So

    仿写: 写作时 identify the causal mechanism you want to explain。Start with the cause,用 'because'、'since'、'as a result' 等词 link to effect。可以 construct causal chains(A导致B,B导致C)来 show complex relationships。模版:'Because/Since [原因], [结果]. This leads to [进一步的结果], which explains why [回扣论点].'

  • 因果论证

    P5

    作者在第五段 explains stereotype threat 的 causal mechanism:identifying race/sex → activating negative stereotype thoughts → worse performance。这个 step-by-step causality 解释了 how stereotypes negatively impact individuals,为文章的 second main problem 提供 mechanistic explanation,让 readers understand not just 'what happens' but 'why it happens'。

    信号词 Because Since As a result Therefore Thus Consequently This leads to Due to Owing to So That makes them

    仿写: 写作时 identify the causal mechanism you want to explain。Start with the cause,用 'because'、'since'、'as a result' 等词 link to effect。可以 construct causal chains(A导致B,B导致C)来 show complex relationships。模版:'Because/Since [原因], [结果]. This leads to [进一步的结果], which explains why [回扣论点].'

  • 引用论证

    P5

    作者 cites psychologist Claude Steele 和他的 stereotype threat concept 作为 authoritative source。通过 reference to established research,作者的 argument gains credibility 和 scientific backing。这个 citation 不仅 provides expert support,还 introduces a technical term 来 frame the discussion,让 argument 更加 rigorous and academic。

    信号词 According to As [expert] pointed out Research by [Expert] argues that Studies show [Expert] described As noted by

    仿写: 选择 relevant and credible sources 来 support your point。明确 mention the expert's name 和 credentials,简要 summarize their findings,然后 connect 到你的 argument。模版:'According to [专家名字及身份], [专家观点或研究发现]. This [supports/demonstrates/reveals] that [回扣你的论点].'

  • 反问修辞

    P5

    作者用 'Want to know how to make a woman do worse on a math test?' 这个 rhetorical question 来 engage readers 并 build anticipation。这个 question 不需要 actual answer from readers,而是 serves as transition 到下一个 parallel example。通过 create a conversational tone,这个 device makes the academic content more accessible 和 engaging,同时 emphasizes the pattern 在不同 groups 中的 consistency。

    信号词 Want to know How can Why would What if Isn't it Don't you think Can you imagine

    仿写: 使用反问时 ensure the answer is obvious from context。Place it strategically 在引入 important point 或 transition 之前。Keep it concise 和 directly relevant。模版:'Want to know [如何达成某结果]? [直接给出答案]. This shows that [论点].'或'How can we [解决某问题]? The answer is [答案].'

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

10 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 刻板印象并非贬义词的辩护

    P1
    "Stereotype" may sound like a bad word, but there's nothing bad about it.

    委婉表达 may sound like may seem might appear could be seen as appears to be sounds like seems like

    作者通过 may sound like a bad word 这个 phrase 先 acknowledge 了 general public 对 stereotype 这个 term 的 negative perception,但紧接着用 but there's nothing bad about it 进行 direct rebuttal。这个 implication 是:虽然 stereotype 在 everyday usage 中带有 negative connotation,但从 objective、scientific 的 perspective 来看,它本身是 neutral 的。这为整篇 article 的 tone 定下了基调,即作者要 challenge conventional wisdom,defend stereotypes 的 legitimate existence。对于 main thesis 的 value 在于:它 preemptively 消除了 readers 的 initial bias,为后续 present balanced view (both benefits and problems) 铺平道路,使 argument 更具 persuasiveness。

  • 刻板印象的积极面向

    P1
    stereotypes are often accurate... stereotypes are often positive

    模糊限制语 often usually sometimes frequently generally typically commonly

    作者 use often 两次来 describe stereotypes 的 positive attributes (accurate 和 positive),这个 implication 是:stereotypes 虽然不是 always correct,但 in majority of cases 它们是 reliable 的。Often 这个 hedge 既 protect 了作者免于 making absolute claims (避免被 counterexamples 推翻),又 maintain 了 core argument 的 strength。言外之意是 stereotypes have empirical basis,不是 purely arbitrary prejudice。对 main thesis 的 contribution 在于:它 establish 了 stereotypes 的 legitimacy 和 utility,为后面 discuss problems 提供了 balanced foundation。没有这个 positive framing,后续的 critique 会 seem one-sided。

  • 群体内刻板印象的正面性

    P2
    stereotypes are often positive, particularly of groups that we ourselves belong to

    强调限定词 particularly especially specifically notably in particular most notably above all

    作者 use particularly 来 highlight in-group stereotypes (we ourselves belong to) 的 positive nature,这个 implication 是:人们对 own group 的 stereotypes tend to be especially favorable,这是 human psychology 的 natural tendency (in-group bias)。言外之意是 stereotypes 不仅 can be positive,而且 when applied to ourselves,我们 actively embrace 和 perpetuate 这些 positive generalizations。这个 observation adds psychological depth to the argument,说明 stereotypes 不单是 external labels,也是 self-perception 的 part。对 thesis 的 value 是:它 demonstrate stereotypes 的 pervasiveness 和 natural human tendency,进一步 defend 它们不是 inherently problematic。

  • 刻板印象问题的引入

    P3
    But there are problems with stereotypes.

    转折类 But but however yet nevertheless nonetheless on the other hand

    这个 But 在 paragraph-initial position 非常 strategic,它 signal 了 essay 的 major turning point。前两段 establish stereotypes 的 legitimacy 和 positive aspects,而这个 But introduce 了 problems 和 limitations。Implication 是:虽然 stereotypes 有 their merits,但我们不能 ignore 它们的 problematic dimensions。这种 two-sided approach demonstrate 作者的 balanced、critical thinking。对 main thesis 的 crucial role 是:它 enable 作者 present nuanced argument (既非 complete endorsement 也非 total rejection),这正是 thesis statement 所 convey 的 balanced view。Without this pivot,essay 会变成 one-sided defense,失去 analytical depth。

  • 信息来源的偏见问题

    P3
    they're reliable insofar as they're based on unbiased samples. But a lot of the information we get about human groups is through biased sources

    条件限定类 insofar as to the extent that as long as provided that only if on the condition that assuming that

    作者说 stereotypes are reliable insofar as based on unbiased samples,然后 immediately use But 指出 a lot of information 是 through biased sources。这个 implication 极为 critical:stereotypes 在 theory 上可以 reliable,但 in practice,由于 information sources 的 bias (如 media representation),实际的 stereotypes 往往 inaccurate。言外之意是 the problem 不在于 stereotyping 这个 cognitive process 本身,而在于 input data 的 quality。对 main thesis 的 importance 在于:它 pinpoint 了 first major problem (reliance on biased information),为后面的 Shylock example 提供了 theoretical framework,同时 explain 为什么 stereotypes despite being useful can be problematic。

  • 莎士比亚作品中的犹太人形象

    P4
    If the only Jew you know is Shakespeare's Shylock, it's going to be a very bad impression.

    假设条件句 If if suppose imagine what if in case assuming

    作者 construct 一个 hypothetical scenario:if Shylock 是你 only exposure to Jews,你会形成 very bad impression。这个 implication 是 limited、biased exposure 会 lead to distorted stereotypes。言外之意不是说 everyone's situation 就是这样,而是通过这个 extreme case 来 illustrate the principle:当 information sources 有限且 biased 时,resulting stereotypes 必然 inaccurate and harmful。对 main thesis 的 function 是:它 provide 了 concrete、vivid example 来 support 第3段 提出的 theoretical problem (biased sources),使 abstract argument 变得 tangible and memorable,加强了 first problem 的 persuasiveness。

  • 问题根源的定位

    P4
    So one problem with stereotypes is while we are good at drawing conclusions from them, often our information isn't reliable.

    让步转折类 while although though even though even if despite in spite of

    作者说 while we are good at drawing conclusions,our information isn't reliable。这个 concessive structure 的 implication 是:人类的 cognitive ability (drawing conclusions from patterns) 本身没问题,真正的 problem 在于 data quality。言外之意是 shifting blame from the stereotyping process itself to the information environment。这 reinforce 了作者的 balanced view:stereotypes as cognitive tools 是 legitimate 的,问题出在 external factors (biased sources)。对 thesis 的 significance 是:它 clearly articulate 了 first major problem 的 essence,为 second problem (stereotype threat) 做好 transition,同时 maintain 了对 stereotypes 本身的 partial defense。

  • 刻板印象威胁现象

    P5
    A second problem is that stereotypes, regardless of whether or not they're accurate, can have a negative effect

    让步让步类 regardless of whether or not regardless of no matter whether or not irrespective of whatever in any case

    作者用 regardless of whether or not they're accurate 来 introduce second problem,这个 implication 极为 powerful:即使 stereotypes 是 accurate 的 (解决了 first problem),它们仍然可以 cause harm through stereotype threat。言外之意是 accuracy 不能作为 complete defense,因为 the mere awareness of stereotypes,无论 true or false,都会 negatively impact performance。这 demonstrate 了 stereotype 问题的 depth:不仅 inaccurate ones 有害,连 accurate ones 也能 harm people。对 main thesis 的 critical contribution 是:它 establish 了 second major problem,使 argument 更加 comprehensive,show 即便 solve information bias,stereotypes 仍有 inherent issues due to psychological mechanisms。

  • 实验操作的简易性

    P5
    Here's how to make African-Americans do worse on a math test. You have the test and you put on the test that they have to identify their race.

    指示性陈述 Here's how to This is how The way to Here's what happens You can Simply All you need to do

    作者用 Here's how to make...do worse 这种 recipe-like format,配合极其 simple operation (just marking race/sex),这个 implication 是 stereotype threat 非常容易 trigger,不需要 explicit discrimination or complex manipulation。言外之意是这个 psychological phenomenon 的 power and pervasiveness:只需一个 seemingly innocuous question (标注种族),就能 activate negative stereotypes 并 impair performance。对 main thesis 的 rhetorical impact 是:通过 demonstrate 操作的 simplicity,作者 make stereotype threat 显得 more concerning and widespread,strengthen 了 second problem 的 seriousness。这种 plain、almost clinical presentation 反而增强了 findings 的 credibility and impact。

  • 刻板印象的双向作用

    P6
    When Asian-American women are asked to mark down their race, they do better... You ask them, on the other hand, to mark down their sex, they do worse

    对比类 on the other hand in contrast by contrast conversely by comparison alternatively on the contrary

    作者 present 同一群体 (Asian-American women) 在两种 conditions 下的 opposite outcomes:标注 race 时 perform better (因为 activated positive stereotype about Asians),标注 sex 时 perform worse (因为 activated negative stereotype about women)。这个 clever twist 的 implication 是:同一个人可以 simultaneously hold 多个 identity categories,associated with different stereotypes,哪个 identity being salient 就 activate 相应的 stereotype effect。言外之意是 stereotype threat 不是 fixed attribute of individuals,而是 highly malleable and context-dependent。对 main thesis 的 profound contribution 是:这个 example demonstrate stereotype threat 的 complexity and pervasiveness (affecting even high-performing groups),并 show 它的 psychological mechanism 是 automatic and powerful,further establishing why this is a serious problem。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( Nuanced and Balanced)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 识别正反并举结构 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    议论文中作者如果采用 balanced structure 来呈现不同 viewpoints,通常表明他的 attitude 是 objective 而非 one-sided 的。这种 organizational pattern 本身就是 neutrality 的重要信号,因为 biased authors 往往会直接 criticize 或 praise,而不会花时间去 acknowledge opposite views。

  2. 识别限定性语言 P1 P2 P3

    Qualifying words 像 'often'、'may'、'can be' 这类 expressions 显示作者避免 making absolute claims,这是 objective writing 的典型特征。如果作者态度是 strongly critical 或 enthusiastically supportive,他会用 'always'、'never'、'definitely' 等 definitive language。通过识别这些 hedging devices,我们能判断作者是在 present facts objectively 还是在 push an agenda。

  3. 观察证据呈现方式 P4 P5 P6

    在议论文中,作者如何 present evidence 能 reveal 他的 attitude。Neutral authors 倾向于 let the evidence speak for itself,用 'research shows'、'studies indicate' 等 impersonal constructions;而 opinionated authors 会在 evidence 后面加上 'This clearly proves' 或 'Obviously' 等 interpretive remarks。通过观察作者是 simply presenting facts 还是 heavily interpreting them,我们能判断他的 objectivity level。

  4. 检查结论性立场 P5 P6

    议论文作者的 final position 最能体现他的 true attitude。Neutral writers 往往会 present complexity without pushing for a single solution,让 readers form their own opinions;而 biased writers 会在结尾处 strongly advocate for their viewpoint。这篇文章通过 presenting both benefits and risks of stereotypes,without calling for action in either direction,展现了 analytical rather than prescriptive 的 approach,这是 objective academic writing 的标志。

文中的态度信号词

  • nothing bad P1

    这个 phrase 是作者为 stereotypes 进行 mild defense 的信号。'Nothing bad' 比 'good' 更 moderate,表明作者不是在 enthusiastically endorse stereotypes,而是在 counter the common negative perception。这种 double negative construction(nothing bad)本身就是 hedging device,显示 cautious attitude。

    同类词 nothing wrong not negative not harmful acceptable reasonable

  • often accurate P1

    'Often' 这个 frequency adverb 是 qualifying language 的典型代表,表明作者认为 stereotypes are accurate,但不是 always。这避免了 overgeneralization,shows the author is being precise and fair。如果作者说 'always accurate',那会显示 biased support;'often' 则保持了 balanced assessment。

    同类词 often frequently usually commonly in many cases

  • But P3

    这是全文最关键的 turning point。'But' 标志着作者从 defending stereotypes 转向 discussing problems。这个 conjunction 的出现表明作者 intentionally presents both sides,这是 balanced argumentation 的 structural signal。如果作者只想 criticize stereotypes,他不会花两段时间 describe their merits。

    同类词 but however yet nevertheless on the other hand

  • problems with P3

    'Problems with' 是 objective identification of negative aspects,不同于 'terrible flaws' 或 'serious dangers' 这种 emotionally charged language。作者用 neutral terminology to introduce criticisms,表明他在 analytically examine downsides 而非 emotionally condemn。这个 phrase 的 moderate tone 支持 balanced attitude。

    同类词 issues with concerns about difficulties with challenges of drawbacks of

  • can have P5

    'Can have a negative effect' 用 modal verb 'can' 表示 possibility 而非 certainty。这意味着作者认为 stereotypes 不是 always harmful,而是 have the potential to be。这种 probabilistic language 避免了 deterministic claims,保持 academic rigor and balanced perspective。

    同类词 can may might could potentially

  • One recent study found P6

    这个 phrase 表明作者 relies on empirical evidence 而非 personal opinions。'One recent study' 的 impersonal construction 和 specific attribution 体现 academic objectivity。作者作为 messenger of research findings 而非 opinionated commentator,这 role positioning 支持 neutral stance。

    同类词 study found research shows evidence indicates data suggest findings reveal

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开头直接表态 P1

    第1段 开门见山地说 'there's nothing bad about it',这是典型的 opinion statement。如果是说明文,会说 'stereotype is defined as...',如果是新闻,会说 'a new study on stereotypes was published...'。议论文的 key feature 就是作者从一开始就 take a position。

  2. 逻辑连接词模式 P1 P2 P3

    第1段 用 'For one thing',第2段 用 'Also',第3段 用 'But',这是典型的 argumentation structure。作者在 build a case,不是在 present information objectively。说明文会说 'There are three types of stereotypes',新闻会说 'The incident occurred at 3pm'。

  3. 承认与反驳结构 P3 P4 P5 P6

    第3段 开始说 'But there are problems with stereotypes',这是 counterargument 的开始。作者先说 stereotypes 的 positive aspects,然后 shift 到 problems,这个 dialectical structure 是议论文独有的。说明文会平铺直叙地说 'Stereotypes have both advantages and disadvantages',不会用 'but' 来 challenge。

  4. 三重特征综合判定 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

    综合三个 features:evaluative thesis + logical argumentation + dialectical structure,这三者同时出现就能 confidently identify 议论文。说明文可能有前两个但缺第三个,新闻三个都没有,只有 factual reporting。这篇文章每段都在 advance 作者关于 stereotypes 的 argument,而非 neutrally inform 或 report events。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • But P3 论证逻辑连接词(转折对比词) However Yet Nevertheless On the other hand Although
  • For one thing P1 论证逻辑连接词(列举论据词) Also A second problem is In addition Furthermore Moreover
  • there's nothing bad about it P1 观点表态词(立场判断词) there's nothing bad about there's nothing inherently wrong about there are problems with troubled by it's going to be a very bad impression
  • For example P4 论证逻辑连接词(举例论证词) such as Here's how for instance to illustrate case in point
  • That's an example of how P6 论证逻辑连接词(总结归纳词) This shows that Thus Therefore As a result This suggests that
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

9 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 的常见问题

2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的主旨是什么?
刻板印象本身并非坏事,往往准确或积极,但存在两个主要问题:它们依赖可能有偏见的信息来源,并且会通过刻板印象威胁对个体产生负面影响,即对刻板印象的意识会损害表现。(英文表述:Stereotypes are not inherently bad and are often accurate or positive, but they pose two main problems: they rely on potentially biased information sources, and they can negatively impact individuals through stereotype threat, where awareness of stereotypes impairs performance.)
2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是客观中立(Nuanced and Balanced)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 398 词、6 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 6 段按议论文骨架分为 3 个意群:引言 · 第1段、第2段——刻板印象并非坏事;分论点 · 第3段、第4段——问题一:信息来源的偏见;分论点 · 第5段、第6段——问题二:刻板印象威胁效应。
2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(Nuanced and Balanced)。判断路径:识别正反并举结构 → 识别限定性语言 → 观察证据呈现方式 → 检查结论性立场;文中的态度信号词包括 nothing bad(第1段)、often accurate(第1段)、But(第3段)、problems with(第3段)、can have(第5段)、One recent study found(第6段)。
2017年12月英语六级真题第2套 Part II Section C (2) 文章中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:insofar(在...的范围内;就...而言;只要)、ignite(点燃;激起;引发)、depiction(描绘;描述;刻画)、morale(士气;信心;精神状态),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: