2025年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (2) Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet
Postgraduate · 来自 2025年考研英语一真题 · Section II Part A (2) · 阅读理解(四选一)

Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet

《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》 —— 2025年考研英语一真题文章逐层精读

本文疑选自 sciencebusiness.net(科学商业网)上的一篇标题为“Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet”(《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》)的评论文章(未逐字确认)。

本页是 2025年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 421 词、7 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在考研英语一文章中占 90%),作者立场为「积极支持」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他考研英语真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

7 段英文原文

以下为2025年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (2) 的阅读理解(四选一)原文,共 7 段。左侧 P1–P7 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet

I was shocked to learn recently that some scientists want to scale back their research in an effort to decrease carbon emissions. The crisis is here, they said, and we need to cut back on our energy-intensive modelling. At the very least, we need to make our energy use far more sustainable.

It is unarguable that our laboratories, scientific instruments, rockets and satellites—the tools we scientists need to measure the planet's pulse—demand significant amounts of energy both in their construction and operation. And it is equally true that science's unrelenting appetite for information has caused a mushrooming of energy-intensive data centres around the world. According to the International Energy Agency, these buildings now consume about 1 per cent of the world's electricity.

However, this is a price we must pay for understanding the world. How can we inform decision makers about the best ways to bring down carbon emissions if we can't track the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, where it's coming from and who's producing it? The carbon emissions from technological research are well spent: ultimately this research will safeguard the future of our planet.

It can be hard for scientists to make the case because our work is complex, often takes place behind closed doors and does not always lend itself to easy interpretation or explanation. But demonstrating the efficacy of science will be crucial if we are to solve humanity's greatest challenges.

Recognising the hope that science and engineering can bring was the impetus behind the creation of the Millennium Technology Prize, which is now entering its 20th year as a celebration of human ingenuity. One of the past winners, Professor Martin Green from the University of New South Wales, Australia, is the inventor of the Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell technology which is now found in most of the world's solar panels. Thanks to his invention, we have a real chance to decrease the world's carbon emissions.

Every day, scientists, technologists and engineers are discovering new ways to exploit renewable energy sources and develop techniques not just to use power more intelligently but to power our intelligence. A great example of this is Europe's largest supercomputer, LUMI in Finland, which is astonishingly carbon-negative. Established in an old paper mill, it is powered by a nearby river and its remote heat warms the people who live in the surrounding town of Kajaani.

If the world is to meet its net-zero ambitions, we must think hard about how we can deliver sustainable computing and deliver more LUMIs.

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

7 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2025年考研英语一真题 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    A Debate over Research Emissions

    The author introduces the debate over reducing scientific research to lower carbon emissions.

    本段是全文的 opening move,它先建立“科研耗能是否应削减”这一 tension。后文的 However、examples 和结论都将围绕这一问题展开,因此它为文章“科研排放值得付出”的主旨提供了必要的论辩起点。

    抓住争议引子
  2. P2

    The Energy Cost of Science

    Scientific research undeniably has a significant energy cost.

    本段承担 concession 的论证职责,表明作者不回避科研排放问题。正因为先承认科研的能源成本,第三段提出“this is a price we must pay”时才更有说服力,并形成“有成本,但值得”的完整逻辑。

    归并耗能证据
  3. P3

    Why Research Emissions Are Worthwhile

    Research emissions are justified because science is essential for climate action and planetary protection.

    本段是全文的 argumentative centre,它直接回答第一段提出的疑问,并给出“科研不能缩减”的首要理由。它把科研从“排放来源”重新界定为 climate governance 的基础,奠定全文支持科研持续发展的主论点。

    抓住转折立场
  4. P4

    Making the Case for Science

    Scientists must clearly demonstrate the value of their complex work.

    本段是从理论立场到社会沟通的过渡:第三段说明科研为何值得,第四段说明科学界为何必须把这种价值讲清楚。它为下文列举 Millennium Technology Prize 和具体技术成果作了自然铺垫。

    区分困难与主张
  5. P5

    Solar Innovation in Action

    Solar technology illustrates how scientific innovation can reduce carbon emissions.

    本段为第三段的价值判断提供了首个 concrete example,证明科研投入并非只消耗能源,也能产出大规模减排技术。它以太阳能电池这一读者熟悉的成果,使“科研保护地球”的主旨变得可验证、可感知。

    由案例提炼论据
  6. P6

    Sustainable Computing: The LUMI Model

    LUMI shows that advanced computing can be powered sustainably and even become carbon-negative.

    本段进一步回应了第二段的数据中心耗电问题:科研和计算不必然等于高碳排放,它们可以通过 renewable power 和 heat reuse 转型。它将第五段的“科技帮助外部减排”推进为“科技自身也能绿色运行”。

    提炼示范意义
  7. P7

    More LUMIs for Net Zero

    Achieving net zero requires expanding sustainable computing models like LUMI.

    本段是全文 conclusion,它把前文的立场、论据和案例收束为明确行动方案。作者最终并未否认科研的能源问题,而是主张通过 sustainable computing 和更多 LUMI 式实践,让科学继续服务于 net-zero 与地球未来。

    抓住结尾倡议
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

7 道逐段细节自检题

针对2025年考研英语一真题这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 scientists propose climate crisis

    What do some scientists propose in response to the climate crisis?

    • A They call for ending all energy-intensive scientific work immediately.
    • B They urge governments to ban the construction of data centres.
    • C They suggest scaling back some research activities to reduce carbon emissions.
    • D They recommend expanding energy-intensive modelling to improve climate forecasts.
    • E They argue that climate modelling should receive more funding.
    • F They expect satellites to solve the carbon-emissions problem.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项完整保留了原文的因果链:scale back research 是行动,decrease carbon emissions 是目的。some 避开了“停止全部科研”的绝对化误读,research activities 也概括了 modelling 而没有无依据地扩大到所有科学工作。障碍在于题干的 crisis 容易诱导考生凭环保常识选择发展 renewable energy 等看似积极、但并非该人物建议的内容。

    紧盯建议动词 时间最紧时,直接抓题干中的 scientists propose,并回扫 第1段 内紧随 said 的 want to 与 need to 结构。不要逐个翻译六个选项;先把正确项定义为“人物提出的可执行动作”,再反向删除把程度推到 all、把对象换成 governments 或把背景词当答案的选项。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 International Energy Agency 1 per cent

    According to the International Energy Agency, what currently uses about 1 per cent of the world's electricity?

    • A Laboratories used to measure the planet's pulse.
    • B Scientific instruments, rockets and satellites.
    • C All forms of technological research.
    • D Energy-intensive data centres around the world.
    • E Solar panels installed worldwide.
    • F Renewable-energy facilities in Finland.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    正确项准确还原了 these buildings 的先行词,即 mushrooming of energy-intensive data centres around the world。它没有把数据泛化为所有 scientific facilities,也保留了 energy-intensive 这个关键限定。障碍是原文在数字前插入 buildings,考生若不做回指,容易错选邻近出现的 laboratories。

    代词逆追法 最快路径是用 International Energy Agency 和 1 per cent 直达 第2段 的末句,然后执行“代词逆推”:从 these buildings 向前只追一个名词短语。正确项就是该短语的同义压缩;所有没有通过 this 或 these 回指检验的选项直接淘汰。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 technological research justified

    Why does the author consider emissions from technological research justified?

    • A It produces less carbon dioxide than every other industry.
    • B It eliminates the need to monitor atmospheric carbon dioxide.
    • C It enables decision makers to ignore emission sources.
    • D It guarantees that all countries will reach net-zero targets.
    • E Such research provides information needed to protect the planet's future.
    • F It makes scientific work easier for the public to interpret.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项概括了完整推理:研究使人们能够 track carbon dioxide 的数量、来源和责任主体,从而 inform decision makers,最终 safeguard the future of the planet。provides information 是对多项监测能力的上位概括,protect the planet's future 对应 ultimately 的最终收益。障碍在于原文用连续反问展开论据,考生需把问句整合为正向理由。

    评价句夹读 紧张时用 justified 作“评价雷达”,在 第3段 只读 However 后的结论句和 ultimately 所在句,再把中间两句反问压缩成“信息支持决策”。正确项必须同时覆盖 information 与长远 planet benefit;仅复述排放或夸大结果的选项无需细读即可排除。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 make the case difficult

    Why can it be difficult for scientists to make the case for their work?

    • A Their findings have failed to address humanity's greatest challenges.
    • B They refuse to share any information with decision makers.
    • C Their instruments are too expensive to operate.
    • D The public has no interest in scientific explanations.
    • E Scientists lack the technology needed to conduct research.
    • F Their work is complex, often hidden from public view, and not always easy to explain.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项平行概括了三个原因:complex 对应复杂性,hidden from public view 对应 behind closed doors,not always easy to explain 对应不易解读或说明。often 与 not always 也保留了原文的限定,避免绝对化。障碍在于正确项不用 closed doors 的字面说法,而以 public view 做语义转换。

    因为后三连拍 直接用 make the case 回到 第4段,采用“because 后三连拍”:只抓三个并列形容或短语,并把它们压缩为正确项。随后用词性筛选干扰项:能作原因的复杂性、隐蔽性、可解释性保留;谈资金、公众态度、研究失败的内容全部剔除。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 Millennium Technology Prize original purpose

    What was the original purpose of creating the Millennium Technology Prize?

    • A To celebrate the hope created by human ingenuity in science and engineering.
    • B To fund the construction of solar panels in Australia.
    • C To reward only inventions that have already reduced global emissions.
    • D To replace traditional university research with private innovation.
    • E To identify the countries responsible for carbon emissions.
    • F To make complex scientific work easier to interpret.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项对应 recognising the hope that science and engineering can bring,并保留 celebration of human ingenuity 的核心。To celebrate 准确回答 purpose,hope 与 human ingenuity 则保留奖项的价值取向。障碍在于原文先说 recognising the hope was the impetus,后说 celebration,考生需要把两种表述整合为目的表达。

    创设前切片 以 Millennium Technology Prize 直达 第5段 后,不读人物长名称,先执行“creation 前切片”:只看 creation 前的 impetus 和后面的 celebration。正确项应是对这一价值动机的同义概括;凡是带 Martin Green、Australia、solar panels 的选项,先按“例子层”降级处理。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 LUMI carbon-negative

    How does LUMI contribute to its carbon-negative performance?

    • A It offsets its electricity use by planting trees around Kajaani.
    • B It uses river power and supplies its heat to warm the nearby town.
    • C It is housed in a paper mill that produces renewable electricity.
    • D It sends heat to a distant city instead of serving local residents.
    • E It reduces emissions by limiting the amount of data it processes.
    • F It relies on satellites to monitor renewable energy sources.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    uses river power 对应 powered by a nearby river,supplies its heat to warm the nearby town 对应其热量为 surrounding town of Kajaani 的居民供暖。正确项把能源输入与供暖用途合并,完整回答 How does,同时没有把 old paper mill 这一设址背景误作能源来源。

    能量双箭头 用 LUMI 和 carbon-negative 锁到 第6段 后,采取“能量箭头法”:只画两条箭头——river 到 LUMI,LUMI 的 heat 到 town。正确项能同时复现两条箭头;把建筑地点、树木抵消或数据规模写成能量机制的选项一律淘汰。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 net-zero ambitions necessary

    What does the author say is necessary for the world to meet its net-zero ambitions?

    • A Stopping all energy-intensive modelling worldwide.
    • B Ensuring that every data centre consumes exactly 1 per cent less electricity.
    • C Developing sustainable computing and expanding projects like LUMI.
    • D Giving the Millennium Technology Prize to more scientists.
    • E Making all scientific work available behind closed doors.
    • F Using satellites to determine who produces carbon dioxide.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项是 deliver sustainable computing and deliver more LUMIs 的平行改写:developing 对应 deliver,expanding projects like LUMI 对应 more LUMIs。它准确保留作者结尾的双重倡议。障碍在于 more LUMIs 并非机械地复制某一台机器,而是推广其代表的可持续计算模式。

    主句双动作 看到 net-zero ambitions,直接定位 第7段,并使用“主句截取法”:跳过 If 引导的目标条件,只截取 we must 后面的两个 deliver 短语。正确项是这两个并列动作的同义合并;任何只重复目标、只复述前文证据或含 all 的选项,都与主句不匹配。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1

    科学家削减研究引发的争议

    作者以 shocked 的情绪引出 controversial issue:一些 scientists 想要 scale back research 来 decrease carbon emissions,直接抛出了文章要讨论的 central controversy,为后续的 argumentation 奠定基础

    通过呈现 scientists cutting back research 这个 controversial stance,establish 了文章要反驳的 opposing view,为作者后续 argue that research must continue 搭建了 argumentative context

    提出争议现象
  2. 分论点 P2

    承认科学研究的能源消耗问题

    作者用 unarguable 和 equally true 这样的 strong concession language 来 acknowledge 对方观点的 validity:laboratories、instruments、satellites 确实 demand significant energy,data centres 消耗 about 1% 的 world's electricity,这是典型的 concession strategy in argumentation

    通过 concede the opponent's point about energy consumption,作者 establish credibility 并为下一段的 counter-argument 做铺垫,这是 sophisticated argumentation 中的 strategic concession,makes the subsequent rebuttal more persuasive

    承认能源消耗事实
  3. 分论点 P3

    科研的能源消耗是必要代价

    用 However 强力转折,提出 core argument:this is a price we must pay。作者用 rhetorical question 来 justify scientific energy use,强调没有 energy-intensive research 就无法 track carbon、inform decision makers,最后用 definitive statement 总结:carbon emissions from research are well spent because they safeguard the planet's future

    这是作者的 main counter-argument,直接 address 引言中提出的 concern,通过 pragmatic reasoning(不 research 就无法解决问题)和 consequentialist logic(short-term cost 换 long-term benefit)来 establish 文章的 central thesis

    论证能源消耗合理性
  4. 分论点 P4

    科学价值的传播挑战与必要性

    Shift focus 到 meta-level issue:scientists 很难 make the case 因为工作 complex、behind closed doors、not easy to explain。但作者强调 demonstrating science's efficacy 是 crucial for solving humanity's greatest challenges,这为后续的 concrete examples 搭建桥梁

    这段通过 acknowledge communication difficulty 来 preempt potential objection(公众可能不理解科研价值),同时 emphasize the importance of demonstrating efficacy,为接下来的 success stories 做 logical transition,strengthen 整体 argument

    论述科学传播重要性
  5. 分论点 P5 P6

    科技突破的成功案例与希望

    用 concrete examples 来 support 前面的 argument:提到 Millennium Technology Prize 和 Professor Martin Green 的 solar panel technology 这个 breakthrough。通过 real-world success story 来 demonstrate 科研投入确实能 deliver solutions that decrease carbon emissions,这是从 abstract reasoning 到 tangible evidence 的关键转变

    通过 present具体的 technological achievement(solar panel technology now found in most panels),作者 provide concrete proof that research investment pays off,这 substantiate 了 第3段 中 'research will safeguard the planet' 的 claim,make the argument tangible and credible

    提供成功案例证据
  6. 结论 P7

    实现净零目标的行动呼吁

    用 conditional structure(If the world is to meet its net-zero ambitions)引出 conclusive call to action,强调必须 think hard about sustainable computing 并 deliver more LUMIs。这个 forward-looking statement 既 summarize 前文的 argument,又 extend 到 broader implication,是典型的 argumentative conclusion

    通过 shift from defending current research 到 calling for specific future action(more sustainable computing),conclusion 把文章从 defensive argument(research must continue)提升到 constructive vision(how to do it better),给 readers 留下 actionable takeaway while reinforcing the main thesis

    提出未来行动方向
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2025年考研英语一真题 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他考研英语文章。

  1. 识别首段立场类型 P1

    议论文的 structure 通常遵循 problem-solution 或 claim-support 的模式。Opening paragraph 会 establish 一个 context 或 present 一个需要 address 的 issue。识别这个 initial stance 能帮助我们判断作者的 argumentative direction,从而预测 main thesis。

  2. 定位对比转折点 P3

    在 argumentative writing 中,转折词是 rhetorical strategy 的关键 indicator。当作者 present 了一个 view 后用 'however' 进行转折,这个 turn 往往 marks 作者 core argument 的开始。这是因为议论文的 persuasive force 依赖于 contrast 和 opposition,转折点就是 thesis 最可能 emerge 的地方。

  3. 验证论证支撑 P3

    议论文的 thesis 不会 stand alone,它必须有 immediate justification 来 establish credibility。当我们看到一个 strong claim 后紧跟 explanatory sentences 或 rhetorical questions,这个 pattern 确认了前面的 statement 就是 thesis。Rhetorical questions 特别重要,因为它们 engage readers 并 reinforce 作者的 logic。

  4. 追踪例证展开 P5 P6

    一个真正的 thesis 会在全文中得到 consistent development。后续段落应该提供 supporting details, examples, or case studies 来 reinforce 这个 central claim。如果某个 statement 后面没有 elaboration,它可能只是 minor point 而非 main thesis。通过检查 follow-up paragraphs 的 content alignment,我们能 confirm thesis 的准确性。

  5. 整合多层论点 P3 P5 P6 P7

    单个 sentence 往往不能 capture 全部 thesis,因为议论文的 central argument 是 multi-dimensional 的。它需要包含 author's stance, the reasoning behind it, 以及 ultimate implications。通过整合转折点的 claim、紧随的 rationale、以及后文的 examples,我们能 construct 一个 comprehensive thesis statement 来准确 reflect 文章的 full argumentative scope。

主旨信号词 However P3 must P3 ultimately P3 crucial P4 thanks to P5 great example P6

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

尽管存在碳排放担忧,科学研究必须继续,因为它对于理解和应对气候变化至关重要。研究的能源成本是合理的,因为它使碳追踪成为可能,并开发出太阳能电池板和碳负超级计算机等可持续技术,最终将保护我们星球的未来。
Despite carbon emissions concerns, scientific research must continue because it is essential for understanding and addressing climate change. The energy cost of research is justified as it enables carbon tracking and develops sustainable technologies like solar panels and carbon-negative supercomputers that will ultimately safeguard our planet's future.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

4 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进考研英语高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • unrelenting 持续不断的、不停歇的、不会减弱的

    现在我们把三条线索串联起来。首先,从 cause-effect relationship 来看,science's appetite 导致 data centres 的 mushrooming,这说明 unrelenting 描述的是一种能够产生持续性影响的特质。其次,从 word formation 来看,un- 否定 + relent(放松)+ -ing,构成了一个表示不放松、不停歇的形容词。最后,从 collocation 来看,unrelenting 修饰 appetite,强化了这种需求的强度和持续性。三条线索共同指向同一个方向:unrelenting 表示持续的、不停歇的、不会减弱的。

    否定前缀词的三角验证法
  • impetus 推动力、动因、促进因素

    现在整合三条线索。从 syntactic structure 来看,impetus 处于 cause 和 effect 之间的关键位置,连接 recognising hope 和 creation of prize。从 discourse coherence 来看,前文强调 science 的重要性,后文说这种认识成为了 impetus,这表明 impetus 是将认知转化为行动的关键因素。从 collocation 来看,the impetus behind 这个搭配强调了它作为背后推动力的角色。三条线索共同指向:impetus 是促使某事发生的推动力、动因或激励因素。

    因果结构中抽象名词的位置分析法
  • ingenuity 创造力、独创性、巧妙的设计能力

    综合三条线索。从 definition and exemplification 来看,ingenuity 通过 inventor 和 invention 来体现,说明它与创新创造能力相关。从 morphology 来看,ingenious 的名词形式,且与 genius 有词根联系,指向智慧和创造性。从 thematic context 来看,在讨论科技解决气候问题的文章中,human ingenuity 被作为值得庆祝的品质,它是人类应对挑战的关键能力。三条线索共同指向:ingenuity 是指人类的创造力、独创性、解决问题的智慧。

    抽象品质词的三维推断法
  • exploit 开发利用、充分使用

    整合三条线索。从 collocation and exemplification 来看,exploit renewable energy 被 LUMI 的实例具体化为利用河流供电,这是正面的能源使用。从 parallel structure 来看,exploit 与 develop 并列,共享正面的 semantic orientation。从 domain-specific usage 来看,在能源科技语境中,exploit 是技术性用语,指开发利用资源。三条线索共同表明:exploit 在此处意为充分利用、开发,而非负面的剥削。

    多义动词的语境敏感推断法
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

7 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 举例论证

    P5

    作者通过列举 Professor Martin Green 发明的 Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell technology 这个 concrete example 来支撑科研价值的观点。这个 invention 现在应用于 most of the world's solar panels,直接证明了 scientific research 能够带来 tangible solutions 来 decrease carbon emissions。通过这个 real-world application,作者让抽象的 'science safeguards the planet' 这个 claim 变得 convincing 和 credible,强化了 the necessity of continued research 这一核心主旨。

    信号词 for example for instance such as take...as an example a case in point to illustrate one of the past winners consider specifically

    仿写: 写作时首先 identify 你的 main argument,然后问自己:有没有 a successful case 或 concrete instance 能 illustrate 这个观点?选择的 example 要具备 representativeness 和 impact。模版:'[领域/人物] is a great example. [具体成就/发明], which [影响范围]. Thanks to [this achievement], we have [positive outcome].' 比如讨论教育改革时可以写:'Professor Li's teaching method is a compelling example. She developed interactive learning modules, which are now used in over 200 schools. Thanks to her innovation, student engagement has increased by 40%.'

  • 举例论证

    P6

    作者引入 LUMI supercomputer in Finland 这个 striking example 来展示 sustainable computing 的可能性。这个 example 特别有力,因为它不仅是 Europe's largest supercomputer,而且 astonishingly carbon-negative,完全颠覆了 'research = high emissions' 的 stereotype。通过描述它 powered by a nearby river 并且 its remote heat warms local residents,作者证明了 scientific infrastructure 和 environmental sustainability 可以 coexist,甚至 create positive externalities。这直接回应了开篇提到的 scientists' concerns about carbon emissions。

    信号词 for example for instance a great example another example to demonstrate this is exemplified by look at consider the case of

    仿写: 寻找能够 challenge common assumptions 的 counterexamples 会让你的 argument 更有 impact。描述 example 时,包含 specific details (地点、规模、运作方式)和 measurable outcomes。模版:'A great example of this is [具体事物], [突出特点]. Established in [地点/背景], it is [运作方式] and [额外效益].' 比如讨论城市绿化:'A remarkable example is Singapore's Supertree Grove, which combines aesthetics with functionality. Built in the city center, these vertical gardens generate solar power and collect rainwater for irrigation.'

  • 因果论证

    P3

    作者在 第3段 建立了 clear causal chain:如果没有 scientific research 来 track carbon dioxide、identify its sources,我们就无法 inform decision makers about the best ways to reduce emissions。这个 logic 直接支撑文章的 central thesis——research 的 carbon cost is justified。通过 rhetorical question 'How can we...',作者暗示这个 causal relationship 是 self-evident 和 undeniable 的,让 readers 意识到 cutting back on research 会导致 inability to combat climate change 这个 serious consequence。

    信号词 because since as a result consequently therefore thus if...then without...cannot how can...if lead to cause

    仿写: 构建因果论证时,明确 identify your cause (某个 action 或 situation)和 effect (resulting outcome)。使用 rhetorical questions 可以让 causal relationship 显得 obvious。模版:'How can we [desired outcome] if we can't [necessary condition]?' 或 'Without [action/resource], we cannot [important goal].' 比如讨论教育投资:'How can we expect innovation if we don't invest in quality education? Without well-trained minds, economic growth becomes impossible.'

  • 对比论证

    P1 P2 P3

    文章 opening 就建立了 striking contrast:一些 scientists 想要 scale back research to decrease emissions(immediate environmental concern),但作者认为这是 shortsighted,因为 research 本身是 solving the climate crisis 的 key(long-term solution)。这个 contrast 贯穿全文,在 第2段 承认 research 确实 consumes significant energy,但 第3段 立即用 'However' 转折,强调 'this is a price we must pay'。通过 juxtaposing short-term costs against long-term benefits,作者让 readers 看到 the paradox 并引导他们接受 continuing research 是 necessary sacrifice。

    信号词 however but on the contrary in contrast whereas while on the other hand conversely yet although despite

    仿写: 有效运用对比时,先 present the opposing view fairly,然后用 'however', 'but', 'on the contrary' 等 transition words 引入你的 counterargument。确保你的 alternative 不仅 addresses the concerns 还 offers superior benefits。模版:'Some argue that [观点A] because [原因]. However, [观点B] because [更强理由]. While [承认A的某个合理点], [强调B的关键优势].' 比如:'Some believe remote work reduces productivity. However, studies show it increases efficiency by 20%. While communication challenges exist, the benefits of flexibility outweigh them.'

  • 反问修辞

    P3

    作者在 第3段 使用 rhetorical question 'How can we inform decision makers about the best ways to bring down carbon emissions if we can't track...?' 这不是 genuine inquiry,而是 rhetorical device 来 emphasize the impossibility of solving climate crisis without research。这个 question 的 answer 是 self-evident('we can't'),所以它 functions as a strong assertion disguised as inquiry。通过让 readers mentally answer the question,作者让他们 actively participate in the argument 并 internalize the logic,使 'research must continue' 这个结论显得 inevitable。

    信号词 how can we can we really is it possible who would what if don't we isn't it wouldn't you agree

    仿写: 构建反问时,确保 answer 是 obvious 且支持你的 argument。结构通常是 'How can we [positive goal] if we [lack essential condition]?' 或 'Can we really [undesirable action] when [serious consequence]?'。让 question 包含 value-laden terms 来 guide readers to the intended answer。模版:'How can we [achieve X] if we don't [do Y]?' 或 'Can anyone seriously believe that [extreme position]?' 比如:'How can we expect students to excel if we don't provide proper resources? Can we really claim to value education while cutting funding?'

  • 比喻修辞

    P2

    作者在 第2段 使用 'measure the planet's pulse' 这个 metaphor,将 scientific monitoring 比作 checking vital signs。这个 medical metaphor 非常 effective,因为它暗示 Earth 是 living organism 需要 constant health monitoring,而 scientists 是 doctors 在 diagnosing and treating the patient。这个 imagery 让 scientific research 的 importance 变得 tangible and urgent,强化了 'we must continue monitoring despite energy costs' 这个 argument。同时,'pulse' 这个词 conveys continuous, rhythmic monitoring 的必要性。

    信号词 like as is metaphorically figuratively resembles

    仿写: 创造比喻时,选择 readers 熟悉的 concrete domain 来 explain abstract concepts。确保 metaphor 的 key attributes align with your argument。模版:'[抽象概念] is like [具体事物], where [关键相似点].' 或直接用 metaphorical language 如 '[concept] pulses/breathes/grows'。比如讨论经济:'The economy's heartbeat weakens when consumer confidence drops.' 或讨论社交媒体:'Information spreads like wildfire through digital networks, consuming attention as it goes.'

  • 比喻修辞

    P2

    在 第2段 'science's unrelenting appetite for information' 中,作者将 science personified 为有 'appetite' 的 entity。这个 metaphor 生动地 conveys scientific research 对 data 的 insatiable demand,同时暗示这是 natural, necessary drive 而非 wasteful indulgence。'Appetite' 这个词既 acknowledges the resource consumption 又 justifies it as fundamental need,为作者后续 'price we must pay' 的论点 paves the way。这个拟人化让 abstract concept of research 变得 tangible and almost sympathetic。

    仿写: 运用拟人时,选择 appropriate human qualities that enhance your message。'Appetite', 'thirst', 'hunger' 适合表达 strong need;'whispers', 'screams' 表达 communication;'grows', 'sleeps' 表达 development。模版:'[抽象概念] [人类动作/特质] [宾语].' 比如:'Technology's relentless march forward demands constant adaptation.' 或 'The data whispers patterns that traditional methods miss.'

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

9 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 科学家削减研究的震惊反应

    P1
    I was shocked to learn recently that some scientists want to scale back their research in an effort to decrease carbon emissions.

    情态词 shocked surprised astonished amazed disappointed alarmed concerned

    作者用 shocked 这个 strong emotional word 来表达对科学家削减研究的 disapproval。这个 implication 是:削减科学研究是一个 wrong approach,是 shocking 的,因此不应该被采纳。这为全文的 main argument 奠定基调——科学研究 despite 其碳排放 must continue。这种 opening emotional stance 直接服务于文章主旨,即 defending 科学研究的 necessity 和 value。

  • 研究能源消耗的让步承认

    P2
    It is unarguable that our laboratories, scientific instruments, rockets and satellites—the tools we scientists need to measure the planet's pulse—demand significant amounts of energy

    让步类 unarguable admittedly true certainly undeniably granted it is true that

    作者用 unarguable 这个 extremely strong concessive word 来 fully acknowledge 科学研究确实消耗大量能源这个 fact。这个 implication 是:作者并非 blind 或 defensive,而是 aware 且 honest about 科学研究的 environmental cost。但这种让步是 strategic 的,因为紧接着 第3段 就会出现 'However, this is a price we must pay',形成强有力的 counter-argument。这种先扬后抑的 rhetorical strategy 增强了作者论证的 persuasiveness,服务于主旨——research benefits outweigh costs。

  • 价格必须支付的转折强调

    P3
    However, this is a price we must pay for understanding the world.

    转折类 However but yet nevertheless nonetheless still on the contrary

    However 后面的 'this is a price we must pay' 包含强烈的 implication:尽管能源消耗是事实,但这个 cost 是 necessary 和 justified 的。Must 这个 modal verb 表达 obligation 和 inevitability,暗示没有其他 alternative。这个转折 directly challenges 第1段 中科学家削减研究的提议,明确表达作者的 core position——研究必须继续。这个言外之意是文章主旨的 pivotal point,从 acknowledging problems 转向 defending research necessity。

  • 反问句强化研究必要性

    P3
    How can we inform decision makers about the best ways to bring down carbon emissions if we can't track the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, where it's coming from and who's producing it?

    反问句 How can we How could we Why would we Who would What is the point of Isn't it Don't we

    这个反问句的 implication 非常清晰:如果没有科学研究来 track carbon dioxide,我们根本无法 inform decision makers 如何减少排放。言外之意是科学研究不是 optional 的,而是 prerequisite 的——it's logically impossible to solve climate crisis without scientific measurement。这个 rhetorical device 比直接陈述 'research is necessary' 更有 impact,因为它 forces readers 自己得出这个 conclusion。这直接支撑主旨:research 是 addressing climate change 的 essential tool。

  • 科学工作复杂性的障碍暗示

    P4
    It can be hard for scientists to make the case because our work is complex, often takes place behind closed doors and does not always lend itself to easy interpretation or explanation.

    模糊限制语 can be hard can be may might could sometimes often

    Can be hard 这个 hedging expression 暗示科学家在 communicating 研究价值方面面临 real obstacles。言外之意是:正因为科学工作 complex 且 not easily understood,所以更需要 better communication 和 demonstration of efficacy。这个段落其实在解释为什么 第1段 中有科学家会提出削减研究——因为公众难以理解科学价值。但作者通过指出这个 communication challenge,实际上是在强调需要 better advocacy,而不是放弃研究。这为 第5段-6 介绍成功案例做 transition,服务于主旨中 'research will safeguard the future' 这个论点。

  • 展示科学效能的关键性

    P4
    But demonstrating the efficacy of science will be crucial if we are to solve humanity's greatest challenges.

    情态词 crucial essential vital critical imperative indispensable necessary

    Crucial 这个 strong word 配合 conditional structure 暗示:展示科学效能不是 nice to have,而是 absolutely necessary 的前提条件。言外之意是:如果不能有效 demonstrate 科学价值,人类将无法解决 greatest challenges(包括 climate crisis)。这个 implication 为接下来 第5段-6 的 success stories(Green 教授的太阳能技术、LUMI 超级计算机)提供了 justification——这些例子正是在 demonstrating efficacy。这个言外之意 bridges problem description 和 solution examples,强化主旨中 'research will safeguard future' 的论断。

  • 实际机会的积极评估

    P5
    Thanks to his invention, we have a real chance to decrease the world's carbon emissions.

    对比类 real chance real actual genuine true authentic concrete

    Real chance 这个表达暗示 Green 教授的太阳能技术不是 theoretical possibility,而是 practical, proven solution。言外之意是:相比其他 speculative 或 unproven 的方法,这项技术提供 tangible、measurable 的减排效果。这个 implication 直接反驳 第1段 中削减研究的提议——科学研究已经产生了 real, working solutions。这个例证服务于主旨的核心:research investment 带来 concrete technologies that address climate change,证明 'carbon emissions from research are well spent'。

  • 碳负排放的程度强调

    P6
    A great example of this is Europe's largest supercomputer, LUMI in Finland, which is astonishingly carbon-negative.

    情态词 astonishingly remarkably extraordinarily incredibly surprisingly strikingly exceptionally

    Astonishingly 搭配 carbon-negative 传递强烈的 implication:LUMI 超级计算机不仅实现了 carbon-neutral,而且达到 carbon-negative,这个成就 exceeds expectations。言外之意是科技研究不仅可以 minimize damage,甚至可以 reverse damage,产生 net positive environmental impact。这个 astonishing example 是对 第1段-2 中能源消耗担忧的最强 counter-argument——研究设施本身可以成为 climate solutions。配合 'Europe's largest' 这个 superlative,强调这不是 small-scale experiment,而是 proven at scale。这完美支撑主旨:research enables development of carbon-negative technologies。

  • 必须思考的紧迫呼吁

    P7
    If the world is to meet its net-zero ambitions, we must think hard about how we can deliver sustainable computing and deliver more LUMIs.

    情态词 must have to need to it is imperative that it is essential that require demand

    Must 在结尾段出现,配合 'if...is to meet' 条件结构,传递 ultimate implication:要实现 net-zero 目标,scaling up sustainable computing like LUMI 不是 optional,而是 mandatory。言外之意是作者对全文的 synthesis:既然科学研究 essential(第3段),又已经产生 carbon-negative solutions(第6段),那么逻辑上下一步 must be 扩大这些成功模式。这个 must 完成了从 defending research 到 prescribing action 的 full argumentative arc,directly supports 主旨中 'safeguard the future' 的终极目标,将论证转化为 actionable directive。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:积极支持

结论先行:本文作者态度为积极支持( Strongly supportive of scientific research despite its carbon footprint)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 开篇情绪反应定基调 P1

    在 argumentative essay 中,opening 的 emotional marker 是判断 author's stance 的 first signal,shocked 这类 negative emotion word 针对的是 cutting back research 的观点,说明作者 disagrees with this approach,从而暗示作者会 defend scientific research。

  2. 让步转折显真意 P2 P3

    议论文中的 concession words 像 unarguable、equally true 表明作者在 acknowledge 反方观点,但这种 strategic concession 通常是为了增强 subsequent counterargument 的 persuasiveness。识别这个 pattern 能帮助预判作者的 true position 会在 following paragraphs 中 emerge。

  3. 情态动词显决心 P3 P7

    在议论文中,must、should、need to 等 modal verbs of obligation 以及 imperative structures 直接 express 作者的 position strength。Must 比 should 更 forceful,表明作者不只是 suggesting 而是 insisting on a course of action,这种 strong modality 是 identify 作者 definitive stance 的 key indicator。

  4. 评价性词汇表倾向 P5 P6

    议论文中的 evaluative adjectives 和 adverbs(如 astonishingly, crucial, greatest)carry 作者的 subjective judgment。Positive evaluation 配合 concrete examples(如 Martin Green 的 invention, LUMI supercomputer)不仅 shows 作者 supports the topic,还 indicates 作者认为这些 examples 是 convincing evidence,体现了 both attitude 和 confidence level。

  5. 全文脉络确认态度 P3 P7

    Rhetorical questions 在议论文中是 powerful persuasive device,它们通常 imply 一个 obvious answer 来 reinforce 作者的 point。Concluding paragraphs 的 prescriptive language(must, should)summarizes 作者的 final position。从 opening shock 到 middle argumentation 再到 concluding prescription,整个 text structure 形成 coherent stance,确认作者是 strongly advocating for sustained scientific research。

文中的态度信号词

  • shocked P1

    Shocked 作为 strong negative emotion word 出现在 opening sentence,instantly reveals 作者对 scaling back research 这个 proposal 的 strong opposition。这个 emotional marker 为整篇 argumentative essay 设定了 defensive tone,表明作者会 protect scientific research 的 value。

    同类词 surprised dismayed alarmed disturbed troubled

  • must P3

    Must 在 this is a price we must pay 中 expresses strong obligation 和 necessity,直接 conveys 作者认为 scientific research 的 energy cost 是 non-negotiable。这个 modal verb 的 forceful nature 显示作者不是在 suggest 而是在 insist on continuing research。

    同类词 have to need to require essential imperative

  • However P3

    However 作为 strong adversative conjunction 出现在 concession paragraph 之后,marks the turning point 从 acknowledging 反方观点到 presenting 作者真正立场。这个 transition signal 前后的 content contrast 清晰地 reveals 作者 prioritizes scientific research over carbon concerns。

    同类词 But Yet Nevertheless Nonetheless On the contrary

  • hope P5

    Hope 在 recognising the hope that science...can bring 中 carries positive connotation,表明作者 views science 为 solution 而非 problem。这个 positive evaluative noun 配合 celebration of human ingenuity,clearly demonstrates 作者对 scientific progress 的 optimistic 和 supportive attitude。

    同类词 optimism promise potential opportunity encouraging

  • crucial P4

    Crucial 在 demonstrating the efficacy of science will be crucial 中 emphasizes 作者认为 proving science's value 的 importance 和 urgency。这个 high-intensity adjective 不仅 shows 作者 supports science,还表明作者认为 defending science 是 urgent priority。

    同类词 critical vital essential key fundamental

  • astonishingly P6

    Astonishingly 修饰 carbon-negative 这个 scientific achievement,这个 extreme positive adverb 表达了作者对 LUMI supercomputer 的 strong admiration。使用 such intense praise language 来 describe 一个 supporting example 清楚地 indicates 作者的 enthusiastic support for scientific innovation。

    同类词 remarkably extraordinarily incredibly amazingly impressively

  • real chance P5

    Real chance 在 we have a real chance to decrease...emissions 中 combines concrete adjective real 和 positive noun chance,表明作者相信 scientific innovation 能 deliver actual results。这种 concrete positive language 比 abstract hope 更具 conviction,showing 作者不是 merely wishful thinking 而是 based on evidence。

    同类词 genuine opportunity viable solution practical way tangible benefit concrete path

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他考研英语 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 首段作者情感立场 P1

    第1段 中作者用 'shocked' 这个 emotional word 开篇,然后立刻 present 了 scientists 要 scale back research 的 viewpoint,这显示作者对这个 issue 有明确的 personal reaction。说明文会 objectively describe facts,新闻报道会 neutrally report events,但议论文会在开头就 establish 作者的 perspective。

  2. 让步反驳转折结构 P2 P3

    第2段 开头用 'It is unarguable that' 来 admit 科学研究确实 consume significant energy,但 第3段 立刻用 'However' 转折说 'this is a price we must pay'。这个 concession-refutation pattern 是典型的 argumentative structure。说明文会 parallel present different aspects 不带转折,新闻报道会 chronologically organize information 不做 evaluation。

  3. 规范性表达语气 P3 P4 P7

    第3段 说 'we must pay',第4段 说 'will be crucial',第7段 说 'we must think hard'。这些 must/should/need to 都是 deontic modality,表达作者认为 what ought to be the case。说明文会 describe how things work (descriptive),新闻报道会 report what happened (factual),只有议论文会 prescribe what should happen (normative)。

  4. 论证性证据支撑 P5 P6

    第5段 和 第6段 分别举了 Professor Martin Green 的 solar panel technology 和 LUMI supercomputer 作为 examples。但这些 examples 不是 parallel topics,而是 serve 同一个 purpose: prove 科学技术能 reduce carbon emissions,support 第3段 的 main claim。说明文会 comprehensively cover different aspects of a topic,新闻报道会 provide factual details,但议论文的 examples are selectively chosen 来 support its argument。

  5. 四维特征综合验证 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

    这篇 text 满足所有四个 criteria: 第1段 的 'shocked' establishes stance, 第2段-3 的 'however' creates refutation, 第3段/7 的 'must' expresses prescription, 第5段-6 的 examples serve argumentation。这些 elements 协同工作来 make the case that 科学研究的 carbon cost is justified。完整的 argumentative structure 证明这确实是议论文。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • I was shocked P1 立场表态词 I believe I argue I contend I maintain We must recognize
  • It is unarguable that P2 论证逻辑连接词 It is undeniable that It is clear that It is evident that There is no doubt that Undoubtedly
  • However P3 论证逻辑连接词 Nevertheless Nonetheless Yet But On the contrary
  • we must P3 立场表态词 we should we need to we ought to it is essential that it is imperative that
  • How can we... if we can't P3 观点引导词 How can we... if Why should we... when What justification is there for On what grounds can How is it possible to
  • It can be hard... but P4 论证逻辑连接词 Although... nevertheless While... yet Despite... still Even though... however Granted... but
  • will be crucial if we are to P4 立场表态词 will be crucial if is essential if is vital if is necessary if is critical if
  • we must think hard about P7 立场表态词 we need to consider carefully we should reflect on it demands that we we must address we cannot ignore
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

12 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》 的常见问题

2025年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章 Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet 的原文出自哪里?
2025年考研英语一真题 Section II Part A (2) 文章 Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet 疑选自 sciencebusiness.net(科学商业网)上的一篇标题为“Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet”(《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》)的评论文章(未逐字确认)。
2025年考研英语一真题文章《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》的主旨是什么?
尽管存在碳排放担忧,科学研究必须继续,因为它对于理解和应对气候变化至关重要。研究的能源成本是合理的,因为它使碳追踪成为可能,并开发出太阳能电池板和碳负超级计算机等可持续技术,最终将保护我们星球的未来。(英文表述:Despite carbon emissions concerns, scientific research must continue because it is essential for understanding and addressing climate change. The energy cost of research is justified as it enables carbon tracking and develops sustainable technologies like solar panels and carbon-negative supercomputers that will ultimately safeguard our planet's future.)
Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet(2025年考研英语一真题文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是积极支持(Strongly supportive of scientific research despite its carbon footprint)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 421 词、7 段;在考研英语一全部 102 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 92 篇(占 90%)。
2025年考研英语一真题文章《观点:缩减科研拯救不了地球》的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 7 段按议论文骨架分为 6 个意群:引言 · 第1段——科学家削减研究引发的争议;分论点 · 第2段——承认科学研究的能源消耗问题;分论点 · 第3段——科研的能源消耗是必要代价;分论点 · 第4段——科学价值的传播挑战与必要性;分论点 · 第5段、第6段——科技突破的成功案例与希望;结论 · 第7段——实现净零目标的行动呼吁。
Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是积极支持(Strongly supportive of scientific research despite its carbon footprint)。判断路径:开篇情绪反应定基调 → 让步转折显真意 → 情态动词显决心 → 评价性词汇表倾向 → 全文脉络确认态度;文中的态度信号词包括 shocked(第1段)、must(第3段)、However(第3段)、hope(第5段)、crucial(第4段)、astonishingly(第6段)、real chance(第5段)。
2025年考研英语一真题文章 Viewpoint: scaling down science won't save the planet 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 4 个:unrelenting(持续不断的、不停歇的、不会减弱的)、impetus(推动力、动因、促进因素)、ingenuity(创造力、独创性、巧妙的设计能力)、exploit(开发利用、充分使用),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: