2025年6月·第2套 英语四级听力真题原文与答案解析

What does the news report say about Vaclav Bursa and Joanna Stephens?

两人各自的名次陈述。答案句不靠转折词，而靠「人物+成绩」的并列陈述定位：finished first overall 和 won the women's division title 分别说明两人都拿了各自组别第一——他们都是「这场 7 Mile Bridge Run 的获胜者」，这正是选项 B 的概括。

• finished first overall↔won this year's 7 Mile Bridge Run「总排名第一」=「赢了这场比赛」

• A)张冠李戴选项盗了原文真实出现的地名「Atlanta」诱你听到就选，但 Atlanta 只属于 28 岁的 Stephens；15 岁的 Bursa 来自 Florida。说两人「都是来自亚特兰大的青少年」既错配了城市，又把 28 岁的人也算成 teenager，双重不符。

  借用原文：Joanna Stephens, 28, of Atlanta

• C)与原文相反原文用时是 41 minutes and 1 second 与 41 minutes and 12 seconds，都是 41 分多，明明大于 40 分钟；选项偏说「less than 40 minutes（少于 40 分钟）」。它盗用了「分钟数」这个耳熟数字，却把实际 41 多分钟篡改成「不到 40 分」，方向正好相反。

  借用原文：41 minutes and 1 second

• D)原词陷阱「Marathon High School」原文确实出现，极易让人听到就选；但原文只说 He is a student at Marathon High School，这个「He」指 Bursa 一人。选项说两人「都是（both）」该校学生，把只属于 Bursa 的身份硬扣给了 Stephens。

  借用原文：He is a student at Marathon High School

What do we learn about the April contest?

最高级定性句即结论。答案句靠最高级信号锁定：one of the most popular running events in the southeastern United States 是对赛事地位的定性总结，几乎与选项 D 逐字对应。听到「one of the most…」这种最高级评价句，要立刻意识到它往往就是某道题的答案落点。

• one of the most popular running events in the southeastern United States↔It is one of the most popular running events in the southeastern U.S.几乎逐字对应，仅缩写化

• A)偷换概念原文说 drew competitors from 41 US states——来自 41 个「州」，另有 Canada, the UK and Switzerland 等少数几国选手。选项盗用「40 多」这个数量级，却把「states（州）」偷换成「countries（国家）」，参赛国其实只有零星几个，远到不了 40 个。

  借用原文：The race drew competitors from 41 US states.

• B)未提及原文涉及「online」的只有 online registration opened in January——指线上「报名」，全文从未说有人「在线观看直播（watched live online）」。选项把「线上报名」悄悄换成「全球粉丝线上观看」，是没有原文支撑的编造。

  借用原文：after online registration opened in January

• C)原词陷阱原文是 closed the span between the Middle and Lower Keys to traffic for 3 hours——封的是中、下礁岛之间的那段「桥/路」三小时；选项把「3 hours」和「closed」原样搬来，却说封的是「the city of Big Pine Key（整座大派恩礁城）」，封闭对象被偷换了。

  借用原文：The run closed the span between the Middle and Lower Keys to traffic for 3 hours

What do we learn from the news report about Tim Peake?

former 点出'过去身份'。答案句开头的 The former British Army Air Corps helicopter pilot 里 former(过去的)就是信号词：它直接交代了 Tim Peake 过去的身份是直升机飞行员，正对 Q3 '关于他我们了解到什么'。

• The former British Army Air Corps helicopter pilot↔He used to be a helicopter pilot.former 名词 = used to be 动词

• A)原词陷阱录音确实念到 ambassador，但说的是他将去 take up a full-time position as ambassador——这是接下来要担任的新职，不是过去就当过；A 把'即将担任'说成 was once(曾经是),时间方向错了。

  借用原文：He's going to take up a full-time position as ambassador for science and space

• B)偷换概念录音说的是他从'欧洲宇航员'岗位上 stepping down permanently from his role as a European astronaut(永久卸任宇航员角色)，并非从军队退役；B 把'卸任宇航员'偷换成'即将从军队退役'，army 一词也只在他过去身份里出现，并未说他要退役。

  借用原文：Tim Peake is stepping down permanently from his role as a European astronaut

• C)张冠李戴录音里 2015 对应的是 He flew to the space station for a 6-month tour in 2015.(2015 年飞往空间站)，而'被选为宇航员'是 selected as a European Space Agency astronaut in 2009(2009 年)；C 把 astronaut 与 2015 错配，年份张冠李戴。

  借用原文：He flew to the space station for a 6-month tour in 2015.

What does Tim Peake say about his work with the European Space Agency?

引语里的评价形容词即落点。态度题的落点在当事人自述的评价词。录音引语里 It has been incredibly exciting and rewarding. 用 exciting、rewarding 两个褒义形容词直接给出他对工作的评价，正是答案句。

• incredibly exciting and rewarding↔unbelievably exciting and rewardingincredibly = unbelievably 同义替换

• B)与原文相反extraordinarily tough and demanding 是负面评价，但他原话是 incredibly exciting and rewarding(激动、有收获)这类褒义；B 把好评偷换成差评，极性正相反。录音里确有 extraordinary 一词(说 the most extraordinary experience)，B 借这个原词制造迷惑。

  借用原文：Being an astronaut has been the most extraordinary experience.

• C)原词陷阱录音确有 an ambassador for human flights to space 这串词，但那是讲他将担任的新角色，不是评价这份工作'对航天贡献巨大'；题干问他怎么评价工作，C 答成'贡献'，是听到原词就选的答非所问。

  借用原文：By assuming the role of an ambassador for human flights to space

• D)张冠李戴录音里 privilege 出现在 I've had the privilege of working with an exceptional team(有幸与优秀团队共事)，讲的是与团队合作的荣幸，不是'作为 ambassador 的特殊荣誉'；D 把 privilege 和 ambassador 硬凑到一起，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：I've had the privilege of working with an exceptional team of individuals

What do we learn about the five cats seen in the Asda store?

客观陈述句直接交代猫的常态。新闻里没有转折，答案就藏在平铺直叙交代事实的句子里：several cats settling down in the shop aisles 配上 five different cats who come almost on a daily basis，直接说明这几只猫是几乎天天来店里的常客。听到 "come almost on a daily basis"（几乎每天都来）就该锁定这是答案句。

• five different cats who come almost on a daily basis↔regular visitors to the store"几乎每天来"="常客"

• A)原词陷阱loyalty to their owners 抓住了录音里的 loyal 这个原词，可录音 The supermarket is known for its loyal customers 说的是超市以"忠实顾客"闻名，忠诚指的是人、不是猫，更没说猫忠于主人。听到 loyal 就选 A，正中原词陷阱。

  借用原文：The supermarket is known for its loyal customers

• B)未提及brought in by the store's customers 听起来合理，但录音明说猫是 wandered in and made themselves comfortable（自己晃进来安顿下来），第一只是 one cat routinely started visiting the store，没有任何"顾客带进来"的内容，属凭常识硬安、原文未提及。

  借用原文：wandered in and made themselves comfortable

• D)原词陷阱pets kept by the store staff 借了录音里的 staff 和 pet 两个原词，可录音里 Staff did their best to discourage the pet from hanging around 说的是店员想方设法"赶"猫、不让它逗留，恰恰说明猫不归店员所有。听到 staff、pet 就选 D，又是原词陷阱。

  借用原文：Staff did their best to discourage the pet from hanging around

What did some customers think when they saw the first cat routinely appear in the store?

顾客行为句直接道出"以为它丢了"。描述顾客当时反应的句子就是答案句：puzzled customers posted on Facebook groups to try to find out if the cat was lost——困惑的顾客发帖打听"猫是不是走丢了"。其中 if the cat was lost 直接点出顾客脑中的念头。听到 puzzled（困惑的）和 lost 就该锁定。

• to try to find out if the cat was lost↔It might have got lost."想弄清是否走丢"="它可能走丢了"

• A)答非所问nuisance to the loyal shoppers 借了 loyal/shoppers 的影子，但录音里顾客看到第一只猫时是 puzzled（困惑），去打听它是否走丢，并没有觉得它"惹人嫌"。猫多到要贴告示是后文的事，且也没说它惹忠实顾客嫌，时间和内容都对不上。

  借用原文：puzzled customers

• B)偷换概念abandoned by its owner 与正解贴得最近，都是"它出事了"，但录音里顾客打听的是 if the cat was lost（是否走丢），是"丢"不是"主人不要了"。况且下文 its owner assured the concerned customers it was very much loved 说主人很爱它，根本没被遗弃。错在偷换了"走丢"与"被弃"这两个相近却不同的概念。

  借用原文：if the cat was lost

• C)原词陷阱It might be 12 months old. 抓住录音真念过的 12 个月，但录音 The unusual situation started about 12 months ago 说的是"这桩怪事大约始于 12 个月前"，12 个月是"猫开始来店多久"，根本不是"猫 12 个月大"。听到 12 months 就选 C，是典型的数字原词陷阱。

  借用原文：The unusual situation started about 12 months ago

What are customers asked not to do?

请求句 asking…not to 直接给出禁止内容。答案句末尾的请求结构就是定位信号：asking their customers not to feed them（要求顾客不要喂它们）。听到 not to + 动词，紧跟的 feed 就是被禁止的那件事。这是"听要求句、抓 not to 后面的动作"的标准落点。

• not to feed them↔Feed the cats."不要喂它们"对应被禁动作"喂猫"

• B)原词陷阱Remove any store signs. 抓住录音真念过的 signs，可录音 staff have been forced to put up signs 说的是店员"贴"告示，从没要求顾客"撤"告示。听到 signs 就选 B，正中原词陷阱，且把"贴"反成了"撤"。

  借用原文：staff have been forced to put up signs

• C)张冠李戴Sit in the shop aisles. 借了录音原词 aisles，可录音 several cats settling down in the shop aisles 说的是猫在过道里安顿，不是顾客坐过道，更没人要求顾客别坐。听到 aisles 就选 C，是原词陷阱加张冠李戴。

  借用原文：several cats settling down in the shop aisles

• D)未提及Bring in pets with them. 蹭了录音里的 pet 一词，但录音里店员唯一对顾客提的要求是 not to feed them（别喂猫），从没说过"别带宠物进店"。带宠物进店是凭常识联想出来的，原文并未提及。

  借用原文：asking their customers not to feed them

What has the woman been thinking of doing next semester?

开场首句直陈打算。信号是女方对话开场第一句的直接陈述 I've been thinking about moving off campus next semester.，与题干 thinking of doing 完全对应——这就是承载答案的那句。

• moving off campus↔Living off campusmoving=living 同指搬离校园住

• A)张冠李戴Sharing her room with friends. 借了后文女方说的 Three of my friends from the dormitory would share the place with me，但那是『四人合租整套房子』，不是『与朋友合住一个房间』，且非她最初的打算，是把后文细节错安到本题。

  借用原文：Three of my friends from the dormitory would share the place with me

• B)原词陷阱Cutting down her living expenses. 盗用了原文反复出现的 the expense 一词，但女方的打算是搬出校外，省钱只是搬出后讨论的一个方面，不是她『在考虑做的事』本身，听到 expense 就选会落坑。

  借用原文：And then there's the expense, too.

• D)与原文相反Moving to the city center. 与原文正相反：女方说的是 if we move far enough from the city center（搬到离市中心足够远的地方），选项却说搬向市中心，极性反了。

  借用原文：if we move far enough from the city center

What does the man suggest the woman take into consideration?

连列费用项+反问提醒。信号是男方一口气列出 Rents in big cities are high, and then there's the cost of electricity and gas 并反问 Have you factored those in?——他反复强调、要女方算进去的正是各项费用，这就是答案句。

• Rents in big cities are high, and then there's the cost of electricity and gas↔Various costs involved罗列各项费用=概括为各种费用

• A)张冠李戴The facilities available. 看似贴居住话题，但原文男方提醒的是费用，厨房、卧室等设施是后文女方自己列搬出去的好处 We'd have a kitchen，并非男方让她『考虑』的事，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：We'd have a kitchen, so we could cook ourselves.

• C)偷换概念Changes in living conditions. 借用了贯穿全程的 living 一词，但男方让考虑的是『费用』这一具体方面，不是笼统的『生活条件变化』，把具体范畴偷换成宽泛说法。

  借用原文：if we move far enough from the city center, the rent is low enough

• D)原词陷阱The distance to her home. 盗用了男方开头 so far from home 里的 home 一词，但那是男方表达担忧的话，并非他要女方『纳入考虑』的方面，且真正反复提醒的是费用，听到 home 就选会落坑。

  借用原文：living all by yourself in an apartment so far from home

What does the woman say she did during high school?

时间词 during high school 处的回指。信号是题干时间词在原文的复现 I did that during high school，而 that 回指紧挨着的 study on the bus——这句就是答案句。

• I did that during high school↔Studied on the busthat 回指 study on the bus

• A)张冠李戴Went through much trouble. 借了男方的话 go through all that trouble，但那是男方对『搬出去折腾』的评价，不是女方说她高中做过的事，把男方的话安到女方头上。

  借用原文：go through all that trouble

• B)原词陷阱Commuted to save money. 把原文出现的 commute（my commute was even longer）和前文省钱话题拼在一起，但女方说高中时做的是在车上学习，并非『为省钱而通勤』，且省钱是合租话题、不是高中经历。

  借用原文：my commute was even longer then

• D)与原文相反Lived on campus. 借用了贯穿全程的 campus、live 等词，但女方高中时是通勤（commute 路上更长），恰恰说明她当时没住校，选项与原意相反。

  借用原文：my commute was even longer then

What does the man say he'll do at the end of the conversation?

转折 but 后的 I'll 表态。信号是结尾男方转折词 but 之后的 I'll discuss this with your mother——but 之后才是他真正要做的事，这就是答案句。

• I'll discuss this with your mother↔Discuss the matter with the woman's motherthis=the matter、your mother=woman's mother

• B)未提及Make a decision within a few days. 里 within a few days 录音从头到尾没出现，是凭『商量后该尽快决定』的常识脑补出来的时限，原文未提。
• C)偷换概念Try his best to persuade his wife. 把男方要找 mother（即他妻子）这层关系拿来，却说成『努力说服妻子』，可原文是 discuss this with your mother——是平等商量，不是单方说服，把『商量』偷换成『说服』。

  借用原文：I'll discuss this with your mother

• D)原词陷阱Weigh the benefits against the disadvantages. 盗用了同句 the benefits are greater than the disadvantages 的原词，但那是男方表达『还没被说服』的态度（but 之前），不是他说接下来要做的事；他要做的是商量，听到 benefits/disadvantages 就选会落坑。

  借用原文：I'm not convinced that the benefits are greater than the disadvantages

What is the woman doing?

开场自报来意。女士一开口就用 I'm looking for a present for my nephew 交代了来店目的，这种"开场自述要做什么"的句子就是 What doing 题的答案句。

• looking for a present for my nephew↔Choosing a present for her nephewlooking for=Choosing 同义改写

• A)张冠李戴全程是女士向店员咨询、店员介绍商品，没有任何采访行为；Interviewing the man. 把"咨询"误当"采访"，且弄反了谁主导对话。
• B)原词陷阱录音确实念到了 Lawrence，但 Lawrence 是要送礼的侄子，女士并不是在"找劳伦斯本人"；Looking for Lawrence. 偷了这个人名来骗"听到就选"。

  借用原文：I'm looking for a present for my nephew, Lawrence

• D)与原文相反是店员（男士）在帮女士选礼物，不是女士帮男士购物；Helping the man with his shopping. 把帮忙的方向反了过来。

How does the man describe Bobo Man, the action figure?

店员正面推介的形容。男士介绍这件玩具时直接说 it's incredibly popular，这句正面评价就是"他如何描述它"的答案句。

• it's incredibly popular↔Incredibly popular.原句直取，几乎零改写

• A)原词陷阱educational 确实在录音出现，但那是女士后来问 something educational、指向拼图，并非男士对 Bobo Man 的描述；Quite educational. 把后文别处的词搬来安到 Bobo Man 头上。

  借用原文：Perhaps something educational

• C)与原文相反batteries 在录音里出现，但男士明确说 It has no batteries——它"没有"电池；Driven by batteries. 取了原词却反了意思。

  借用原文：It has no batteries

• D)未提及录音从未把 Bobo Man 说成幼稚；男士只说它受欢迎、是动画主角。Obviously childish. 属于凭印象编的负面评价，原文无据。

What kind of game does the woman think would be good for Lawrence?

女士本人 so...would be good 的结论。女士先说有姐姐，再用 so maybe a game that they can play together would be good 给出她看重的条件——"两人一起玩"，这正是 think...good 的答案句。

• a game that they can play together↔One he can play together with his sisterthey=他和姐姐，指代还原

• A)张冠李戴exercising the mind 出现在录音，但那是男士介绍拼图时说 great for exercising the mind，不是女士看重的理由；题干问的是女士的想法，故 One he loves for helping exercise his mind. 张冠李戴。

  借用原文：great for exercising the mind

• C)未提及女士没有说看重"有趣又有挑战"；challenging 一词录音根本没出现。One he finds interesting and challenging. 是凭印象编的卖点。
• D)张冠李戴play either alone or in groups 确在录音，但那是男士介绍拼图的卖点 can be played either alone or in groups，不是女士对劳伦斯看重的点；女士看重的是"和姐姐一起"。One he can play either alone or in a group. 把店员的话当成女士的判断。

  借用原文：can be played either alone or in groups

What do we learn from the conversation about the game Battleships?

多年仍受孩子喜爱的信息点。男士说 kids enjoy it just as much today as you and I did when we were young，加上前文 It has been around since the 1930s，合起来支持"几十年来一直被孩子喜爱"。

• It has been around since the 1930s↔It has been enjoyed by kids for decadessince the 1930s=for decades
• kids enjoy it just as much today as you and I did when we were young↔It has been enjoyed by kids for decades孩子持续喜爱=enjoyed by kids

• B)过度推断录音只说这游戏经典、不过时，从没说它"让人想起战争"。It always reminds people of times of war. 是看 Battleships（战舰）这名字凭空联想，原文无据，且 always 太绝对。
• C)原词陷阱女士提到 we had to stay indoors（下雨只能待室内玩），录音只说室内，从没说室外也玩；It has been played both indoors and outdoors. 偷了 indoors 一词，却擅自加上 outdoors。

  借用原文：we had to stay indoors

• D)过度推断男士只说它是 a total classic、自 1930 年代就有，并没说它"是最古老的游戏之一"；It distinguishes itself as one of the oldest games. 把"经典"拔高成"最古老之一"，程度过头。

  借用原文：It's a total classic

What do we learn from the passage about the paradox of choice?

转折 But 加冒号点题，后半才是真意。前一句 We assume that if we offer our customers more choices, then they'll be more likely to buy 是“我们以为”的错误假设，紧跟 But here's the paradox of choice 用转折加冒号正式抛出概念，转折后的内容才是答案句。

• too many choices↔Too many choices原词同形保留
• less likely to buy↔decrease one's desire to buy“更不可能买”=“降低购买欲”，同义改写

• A)原词陷阱A 说陈列多样“增加兴趣”，借的是后文 created more interest里的 interest，但本题问的是 paradox of choice 的核心结论，原文用 But 推翻的正是“选项多就更想买”这种正向假设，A 站在被推翻的一边。

  借用原文：created more interest

• C)与原文相反C 说“更少选择导致更低满意度”，盗用了原文 customer satisfaction 一词，但原文 the bigger display of jams leads to lower customer satisfaction than the smaller display说的是“更多”选择才满意度更低，C 把多少接反了，属与原文相反。

  借用原文：lower customer satisfaction

• D)未提及D 说顾客“get confused”（困惑），听上去像“选择多”的合理后果，但原文从头到尾只说更不可能买、满意度更低，从未提到“困惑”，属凭常识脑补的未提及项。

What did the psychologists want to find out in their 2012 study about jams?

设问句直接点出研究要回答的问题。原文以反问 Guess which display table led to more sales?把整段研究的核心问题挑明——研究就是要看“哪种展示带来更多销量”，这个设问句即研究目的的答案句。

• which display table led to more sales↔What kind of display results in more sales.“哪张桌带来更多销量”=“哪种陈列带来更多销量”

• B)原词陷阱B 说研究想找“哪种展示引起更多兴趣”，借了原文 created more interest里的 interest，但“更多兴趣”是研究顺带得出的结果，研究真正要找的是销量；B 把结果当成了研究目的。

  借用原文：created more interest

• C)未提及C 说研究想找哪种展示“吸引更大客流”，crowd of customers 原文压根没出现，是凭“大展台显眼”的常识脑补出来的，属未提及。
• D)原词陷阱D 说研究想找哪种展示带来“更高满意度”，借了原文 customer satisfaction 一词，但满意度同样是研究附带得出的结论，不是 2012 研究设问要找的目标；与 B 同病，混淆结果与目的。

  借用原文：lower customer satisfaction

What is the finding of an extensive study published in 2015?

found 加冒号列举，结论句标志。原文 They found four rules that motivate consumers to buy以 found 引出、冒号后接四条列举，是这项 2015 研究的总结论句，正是“finding”所在。

• four rules that motivate consumers to buy↔There are rules that motivate customers to buy.“motivate consumers to buy”=“motivate customers to buy”，近乎同形

• A)未提及A 说研究发现“存在顾客什么都不买的情形”，听似贴合“选择多就不买”的主题，但 2015 研究的发现明确是“four rules”，原文没说“buy nothing”，属把前文主题硬套到本题、未提及。
• B)张冠李戴B 说研究发现“提升满意度的技巧”，借了前文 customer satisfaction 一词，但满意度是前一项果酱研究的内容，2015 研究找的是“促买规则”不是“提升满意度的技巧”，张冠李戴且偷换概念。

  借用原文：lower customer satisfaction

• C)偷换概念C 说研究发现“预测顾客偏好的方法”，盗用了原文 consumers don't have clear preferences里的 preferences，但原文说的是“消费者没有明确偏好”是促买的条件之一，绝非“能预测偏好”，属偷换概念。

  借用原文：consumers don't have clear preferences

What do many Americans think of volunteering?

题干同词 many Americans 在 despite 让步从句里现身。答案句里 many Americans view volunteering as worthwhile 与题干 many Americans 完全对上，且 despite（尽管）这个让步信号后面跟的正是‘大家的看法’，听到 despite + many Americans 就该锁定这句。

• view volunteering as worthwhile↔Worthwhile.原句形容词被直接抽出做选项

• A)未提及很多人想当然觉得志愿‘让人有压力’，但录音对态度只给了 worthwhile 一个正面评价，从没说 stressful，属于用常识代替文本的硬伤。
• B)与原文相反录音明确是 worthwhile（值得、正面），Burdensome（负担重的）是负面，方向相反；预读时已把它和 worthwhile 分到对立两组，听出正面语气即可排除。
• D)答非所问录音后文确实讲志愿能 boost happiness、提升健康，本项把这些好处浓缩成‘提神’来诱选，但题干问的是 many Americans think of it 的评价，答案句只给了 worthwhile，本项答非所问。

  借用原文：boost happiness

How could companies ensure both employees and employers benefit from volunteering?

转折 but 之后才是真正答案，且 benefit 与题干呼应。but employees and employers would actually benefit if companies made employee volunteering part of the job 里，转折词 but 后面才是作者的真意，且 benefit、employees and employers 与题干 both…benefit 直接对上，听到 but 紧跟 benefit 就锁定这句。

• made employee volunteering part of the job↔By making it part of the job.过去式陈述改写成 By doing，it 指代志愿

• A)原词陷阱选项 By linking it with employees' salary. 借 employees 这个录音高频词显得耳熟，但录音从未说把志愿与‘薪水’挂钩，salary 是凭常识脑补的合理做法。

  借用原文：employees and employers would actually benefit

• B)原词陷阱录音确有 company volunteer programs could be the perfect 2025 resolution，本项 By taking it as the New Year resolution. 抠走 resolution 一词，但那只是把项目比作‘新年愿望’的修辞，不是‘如何让双方受益’的办法，答非所问。

  借用原文：company volunteer programs could be the perfect 2025 resolution

• C)原词陷阱录音 Most people cite time and conflicting work schedules as major barriers 把 work schedules 说成‘障碍’，本项 By improving work schedules. 把它翻成‘改善作息’当对策，正是 but 转折前的干扰内容，与录音给的真正办法不符。

  借用原文：conflicting work schedules as major barriers

What did 75% of employees say about volunteering in a survey?

数字 75% 直接领出答案，须与相邻 89% 切开。录音连说两个数字，75% said volunteering was critical to their well-being 才是题干要的 75%；听到 75% said 就锁定它后半句，切勿被前面 89% 那句串台。

• critical to their well-being↔It was very important to their well-being.critical 同义替换为 very important

• B)未提及本项 It had taken little of their spare time. 说志愿‘几乎没占业余时间’，录音 75% 的人说的是它‘至关重要’，方向不符；录音只在前文把 time 说成‘障碍’，从没说它‘占用很少’。
• C)张冠李戴录音确有 the workplace becomes an outlet for personal fulfillment，本项 It was an outlet for their personal fulfillment. 几乎照搬这句，但那是作者自己的论述，不是 75% 员工‘在调查中说’的内容，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：the workplace becomes an outlet for personal fulfillment

• D)张冠李戴It helped improve their working environment. 取自 89% of employees perceived companies…as creating a better working environment，是相邻的 89% 那句的内容；题干问 75%，本项把另一个数字的说法搬过来，是典型数字串台。

  借用原文：89% of employees perceived companies that sponsored volunteer activities as creating a better working environment

What do we learn about the UK's retail sector food waste?

首句正面定性 the vast majority。这是段落开篇的总起句，用 The vast majority（绝大部分）直接给 "来源" 下定性结论——细节题的答案常落在这种正面交代主体的句子上，而不是后面的补充。

• The vast majority of the UK's 200,000 tonnes of retail sector's annual food waste comes from supermarkets↔It mostly comes from supermarkets.the vast majority = mostly

• A)未提及录音只说全年总量是 200,000 tonnes（20 万吨/年），选项 It amounts to 2,000 tons daily. 把数字改成 "2,000 吨/天"，数额和 "每日" 的口径都是录音没说的，属于拿一个貌似听过的数字来骗。

  借用原文：200,000 tonnes

• C)原词陷阱录音说的是 It's estimated at less than one per cent of the UK's food waste total——"不到 1%，且是占食物浪费总量"。选项 It is estimated at 11% of the UK's total food supply. 盗用了 "estimated" 这个原词，却把 "less than one per cent" 改成 "11%"、把 "food waste total" 改成 "food supply"，数字与口径全反了。

  借用原文：It's estimated at less than one per cent of the UK's food waste total

• D)张冠李戴录音说浪费主要来自超市，只是 it's a problem that impacts independent luxury food suppliers too——高端供应商只是 "也受影响" 的次要对象。选项 It has a lot to do with independent luxury food suppliers. 盗用 "independent luxury food suppliers" 这串原词，把次要对象说成主因，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：it's a problem that impacts independent luxury food suppliers too

What does Sophie André's business do in London?

creating/setting up 引出业务定义。began by setting up a business delivering luxury hand-made food 用 "setting up a business doing…" 的句式直接给这家公司的主营下定义——这种 "创办一家做……的公司" 句就是业务题的答案句。

• setting up a business delivering luxury hand-made food across the city↔It delivers luxury hand-made food.几近原词的定性概括

• A)原词陷阱录音里 "自行车" 出现在 I started delivering products by bicycle——自行车只是配送 "工具"。选项 It rents bicycles to deliver food. 盗用 "bicycle" 原词，却把 "用自行车送货" 偷换成 "出租自行车"，业务定位完全错了。

  借用原文：I started delivering products by bicycle

• B)原词陷阱"coffee beans" 出现在第一段 sought-after coffee beans gets thrown away，说的是 "被浪费的高端食材举例"，根本不是这家公司在卖的东西。选项 It sells sought-after coffee beans. 盗用这串原词，安到公司业务上，答非所问。

  借用原文：sought-after coffee beans gets thrown away every day

• D)与原文相反录音明确说这家公司 the idea is not simply to redistribute waste food, but to provide a high-quality product——明确否定了 "只是重新分配废弃食物"。选项 It recycles waste food from the city. 盗用 "waste" 原词，恰好把录音否定掉的那层意思当成业务，与原文相反。

  借用原文：the idea is not simply to redistribute waste food, but to provide a high-quality product

In what way does Sophie André's business differ from many food waste projects?

Unlike + not…but 双重对比。这句同时挂着两个信号：开头 Unlike many food waste projects 是明示对比，中间 not simply…but… 把真正不同之处推到 but 之后——答案句就是这种 "对比词 + 转折落点" 叠加的句子。

• to provide a high-quality product↔It aims to provide high-quality products.but 后落点的同义保留

• A)原词陷阱"size or shape" 出现在 a small part of the production is sometimes wasted due to problems with size or shape——是在解释 "为何会有剩余"，不是公司的产品特点。选项 It pays special attention to the size and shape of its products. 盗用这两个词，编出 "特别关注尺寸形状" 这个录音没说的差异。

  借用原文：wasted due to problems with size or shape

• B)过度推断录音只说它 "不只是再分配废弃食物，而是提供高品质产品"，并没说它要 "摆脱现有食物体系的束缚"。选项 It tries to escape the constraints of the current food system. 把朴素的 "提供高品质" 拔高成宏大的体制叙事，是录音支撑不了的引申。
• C)原词陷阱录音只说她 Talking with local producers I learned that…——只是 "和本地生产者交谈" 从而得知信息，并未说 "紧密合作"。选项 It cooperates closely with local producers. 盗用 "local producers" 原词，把 "交谈" 夸大成 "closely cooperate"，且这也不是题问的差异点。

  借用原文：Talking with local producers I learned that…

Why will suppliers always have a certain amount of surplus?

the supply is regular 的因果链。这题的因果不在 "surplus" 那句本身，而在它前面的 the supply is regular——正因要保证 "稳定供应"，所以供应商总会留出一定剩余；"surplus" 那句与 "so the menus remain regular" 共同把 "regular（稳定）" 这条逻辑钉死。

• the supply is regular↔To ensure a regular supply.regular supply 几乎原词对应

• B)原词陷阱录音说的是 So the menus remain regular too——菜单 "保持稳定（regular）"。选项 To maintain a unique menu. 盗用 "menu" 原词，却把 "regular（稳定）" 偷换成 "unique（独特）"，把听过的词配上录音没说的形容词。

  借用原文：So the menus remain regular too

• C)原词陷阱"waste products" 出现在 Elysia uses waste products to create…meals——是说公司 "用剩余食材做餐"，并非 "供应商留剩余是为弥补废弃"。选项 To make up for the waste products. 盗用 "waste products" 这个主题原词，编出一个录音没有的因果，答非所问。

  借用原文：Elysia uses waste products to create "simple, natural, straightforward" meals and snacks

• D)未提及录音通篇没说 "满足顾客的紧急需求"，只讲了供应稳定、菜单稳定。选项 To meet customers' urgent demand. 里的 "urgent demand" 是录音完全没出现的内容，属凭空捏造。