2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section B Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language
CET-6 · 来自 2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 · Part III Section B · 长篇阅读(信息匹配)

Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language

2022年9月英语六级真题第1套文章逐层精读

U.S. New & World Report《美国新闻和世界报道》2016年10月13 日文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language(有人说计算机编程是一门外语)。

本页是 2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section B 文章的精读视角页——这篇议论文全文 1200 词、15 段,CEFR 难度 C1(C1 级在英语六级文章中占 58%),作者立场为「客观中立」;英文原文之外,本篇已有的 11 项精读维度逐项展开,其中能迁移到其他英语六级真题文章的判断方法(篇章结构、修辞、言外之意、作者态度、体裁速判)随各维度一并讲透。

精读最佳实践

本页解析里的段号(P1)都可以点——点一下,原文在顶部翻开并定位到该段,解析引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文,你还停在刚才读到的位置。点 P1 试试。

PASSAGE · 文章原文

15 段英文原文

以下为2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section B 的长篇阅读(信息匹配)原文,共 15 段。左侧 P1–P15 是段落编号——本页全部解析(结构、逐段、修辞、自检题)都以它为坐标回指原文,点击解析里的段号,原文即在顶部翻开并定位到该段、引用的原文同步标亮;合上原文仍停在当前阅读位置。原文保持卷面形态,不带翻译与标注。

Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language

As computer coding has become an increasingly sought-after skill, more K-12 schools are working it into their curriculums. Some states have considered allowing students to forgo(放弃) foreign language for coding classes, despite opposition from educators.

There's a debate over whether it's appropriate to teach coding in elementary schools, with fierce opinions on each side. When it comes to allowing coding to fill foreign language requirements, though, most educators agree: Coding should be added to curriculums, but not at the expense of foreign language classes.

The idea is that computer programming is a language, allowing people to communicate with machines and programs. It's the language of the 21st century and more valuable than a natural language, some advocates argue. The computer science field is growing faster than schools can keep up because of budget constraints and a lack of skills training for teachers.

According to the 2016 U.S. News/Raytheon STEM Index, computer science jobs have helped boost wages in the U.S., and computer-related jobs hold the top seven positions in STEM fields for highest number of workers. Foreign language interest, on the other hand, is declining for the first time since 1995. The number of higher education language enrollments declined between 2009 and 2013 by more than 111,000 spots, according to the Modern Language Association of America.

"I think the opportunity to give people a choice is important," says Florida state Senator Jeremy Ring, who introduced a bill last year that would allow Florida students to choose between foreign language and coding classes for the purpose of university admissions requirements, "I think if you're going to give two years of language in high school, you might as well do computer coding."

The Florida bill died this year after passing 35:5 in the state Senate when the full Legislature failed to take action. It would have been the first state to try this initiative. Ring says that although he will be out of office, an identical bill will be reintroduced within the next year by others on his behalf. "In the speech I gave on the Senate floor, I said, 'We can be the first state to do this, or we can be the 50th state to do it. It's our choice. It's going to happen,'" Ring says.

A Kentucky bill similar to the one in Florida was met with complaints from educators, and was then amended to promote computer science education initiatives with no mention of foreign language requirements. Instead, the state will provide support for higher quality certified teachers for programming classes. Under the Washington bill, public universities would accept two years of computer science classes in place of two years of foreign language for admission purposes. A report detailing the opinions of state university officials is due to the Legislature by November 2017.

Texas passed a bill in 2013 that allows students to substitute computer coding only after they have attempted and performed poorly in a foreign language class. Srini Mandyam, CTO and co-founder of kid-friendly instructional coding company Tynker, believes allowing students to forgo foreign language because they struggle with it is unproductive because every subject, whether art, math or language, is a significant contribution to a well-rounded existence. "Many students don't fare well with algebra but we never discuss eliminating it or … say chemistry is now counted as an algebra class," he said via email. "We teach algebra because it's important and we should teach foreign language and coding for the same reason. Exposure to a wide breadth of subjects and material results in well-rounded students who are able to make informed decisions … about what they want to pursue."

Computer science courses already fulfill a math or science high school graduation requirement in 28 states and the District of Columbia, up from only 12 states in 2013. And while advocates of the bills say they should count as foreign language instead, opponents stress the importance of balancing computer and foreign language skills.

Studies show that bilingualism(双语) correlates with cognitive development, intelligence, memory and problem solving abilities, according to the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. A 2007 study showed that foreign language students outperformed their non-foreign language peers on standardized tests after only two to three years of study. And while a 2014 report from German and American universities suggests that programmers are using language (but not mathematical) regions of the brain when understanding code, critics remain wary. They say that regardless of cognitive functions, being monolingual is a disadvantage in the increasingly international economy, even if English has become the de facto(事实上的) language of business.

"Our world is shrinking but its problems are really growing," says ACTFL National Language Teacher of the Year Ted Zarrow, who teaches high school Latin in Westwood, Massachusetts, and has also studied Spanish, French, German, Italian and Greek. "We need to find a way to put ourselves at the global table and to treat each other with mutual respect. And learning languages allows us to do that because language is not part of culture, language is culture."

Even with the benefits and skill sets languages provide, recruiters and employers value computer skills more. According to the National Association of Colleges and Employers' 2016 report, study abroad and foreign language fluency were not very influential in the employee hiring processes, but 55 percent of employers looked for computer skills on applicants' resumes. However, although 2016 computer science graduates can expect to make the second highest starting salary compared with other jobs this year, the Bureau of Labor predicts the demand for computer programmers will decrease 8 percent or by 26,500 jobs by 2024.

Ring says foreign language skills are important, but expresses doubt that school districts could work both coding and language into their curriculum in a significant way because they lack the time in the school day. "Nothing against language," he says. "I just think it's something you have to start early and not just have something that you do for a couple of years in high school," he says.

Zarrow agrees that foreign language education should begin earlier, but says it is possible to work both computer programming and foreign language learning into schools evenly. He suggests an immersive, dual language program where students spend half the day in English and half the day in another language, as several schools around the country have successfully implemented. "The study of language fosters a respect for diversity, a respect for ethnicity and really a respect for language," Zarrow says.

Though the benefits of computer programming skills are vast, foreign language and coding experts agree that computer science should be negotiated into curriculums rather than replacing foreign language outright. Mandyam says the two skill sets are essential but unrelated. "Coding is an incredibly important 21st century skill for our kids to learn, and that's why we spend so much time trying to teach it," Mandyam says via email. "But I believe it is the same as or even really comparable to learning a foreign language. It would be a shame to lose something so important for the sake of adding something else, even something as important as coding. Clearly, education leaders must figure out a way to teach both."

PARAGRAPHS · 逐段精读

15 段逐段主旨与解读

逐段拆解2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 的这篇原文——每段给出英文段落主旨、段落标题与中文解读,并提炼一条「这段为什么这样读」的具体方法。

  1. P1

    Coding Enters the Curriculum Debate

    The growing demand for coding has sparked debate over replacing foreign language classes.

    本段承担 opening 的功能,它先说明 coding 为什么值得讨论,再推出“替代外语”这一全文核心问题,为后文的正反论证搭建 debate framework。

    趋势引出争议
  2. P2

    Add Coding, Do Not Replace Languages

    Most educators support adding coding but oppose replacing foreign language instruction.

    本段明确文章的主流立场,即 integration rather than replacement。它既回应标题问题,也预告结论:两类课程应当共存。

    抓住转折后立场
  3. P3

    The Case for Coding as a Modern Language

    Supporters portray coding as an essential modern language and stress the need for expanded computer science education.

    本段为“编程可替代外语”的一方提供理论和现实依据,使文章不是单方面反对,而是形成较完整的 argumentative balance。

    提炼支持方理由
  4. P4

    Job Growth versus Language Decline

    Strong computer job prospects contrast with declining enrollment in foreign language study.

    本段以客观 statistics 强化了支持 coding 的现实动因,解释了为什么“让编程替代外语”会对部分政策制定者具有吸引力。

    数据构成对比
  5. P5

    Ring's Argument for Student Choice

    Florida Senator Ring argues that students should be allowed to choose coding instead of foreign language classes.

    本段用具体政治人物的发言,把前文抽象的支持立场落到 Florida bill 的实际政策层面,增强了争议的现实感。

    人物主张加理由
  6. P6

    A Failed Bill with Continuing Support

    Although Florida's coding-substitution bill failed, its supporters expect the proposal to return.

    本段说明替代政策虽然尚未成功,却不是已经结束的话题;它推动文章从理念讨论进入 legislative process 的持续观察。

    结果与前景并看
  7. P7

    Different State Responses

    States are taking different approaches to computer science education and foreign language requirements.

    本段说明全国并不存在统一政策共识,进一步证明 coding 与 language 的关系仍处于探索和协商阶段。

    并列案例归类
  8. P8

    Difficulty Is Not a Reason for Substitution

    Mandyam argues that coding should not replace foreign language merely because students struggle with it.

    本段从全面教育的角度反驳替代方案,强调 coding 与 language 都是学生 broad education 的组成部分,支持文章的兼顾立场。

    透过类比找原则
  9. P9

    Coding Credit without Language Equivalence

    Coding is widely recognized for math and science credit, but its status as a foreign language substitute remains disputed.

    本段厘清了争论边界:文章并不反对承认 coding 的学科价值,而是讨论它是否应跨界取代 foreign language requirement。

    区分共识与争点
  10. P10

    The Cognitive and Global Value of Languages

    Foreign language learning offers cognitive and global advantages that coding cannot fully replace.

    本段是反对替代论的重要证据段,它从大脑发展、考试表现和国际竞争力三个层面论证外语教育的独特价值。

    让步后锁定结论
  11. P11

    Language as a Path to Global Respect

    Zarrow argues that language learning promotes cultural understanding and global mutual respect.

    本段把前段的认知论证扩展到文化与人文层面,表明外语的价值不只是考试或就业,更关乎 global citizenship。

    抓住名言的价值判断
  12. P12

    Computer Skills: Valuable but Uncertain

    Computer skills are highly valued by employers, but programming employment prospects are not uniformly secure.

    本段承认 coding 的职业优势,却用未来就业下降预测削弱“因就业而完全放弃外语”的单一逻辑,使全文论证更审慎平衡。

    优势后看限制
  13. P13

    The Time Constraint Argument

    Ring supports foreign language learning but doubts that schools can teach both coding and languages effectively within limited time.

    本段提出文章的关键现实难题:即使双方都重要,curriculum time 如何分配?这为下一段的解决方案铺垫。

    价值与可行性分开
  14. P14

    A Practical Way to Teach Both

    Zarrow argues that early and immersive language programs can make room for both coding and foreign language education.

    本段直接回应 第13段 的课程时间问题,证明“二选一”并非唯一答案,从而有力支撑文章整合 coding 与 language 的中心立场。

    承认难题再给方案
  15. P15

    The Conclusion: Teach Both

    Coding should be integrated into school curricula without replacing foreign language education because both skills are essential.

    本段完成全文论证闭环:它综合 coding 的技术价值、外语的认知文化价值以及课程设计问题,最终回扣文章主旨,倡导 schools 同时教授两者。

    让步后提出主张
SELF CHECK · 段落自检题

15 道逐段细节自检题

针对2022年9月英语六级真题第1套这篇原文,每段配 1 道细节题( 1 个正确项 + 5 个干扰项 ,由懒笔记精读引擎基于本段命制,非试卷原题)。 选项默认中性;点「显示答案与解析」展开正确项、解析与最快解法,现代浏览器会同步高亮正确选项。

  1. 第 1 段 定位词 some states considered K-12 education

    What have some states considered doing as coding gains importance in K-12 education?

    • A Make foreign-language study compulsory before coding classes.
    • B Require every elementary school to teach programming.
    • C Allow coding classes to replace foreign-language study.
    • D Count coding as a mathematics graduation requirement nationwide.
    • E Reduce university admissions standards for computer science students.
    • F Ban coding classes because educators oppose them.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项准确压缩了 allow students to forgo foreign language for coding classes 的替代关系:replace 对应 forgo,coding classes 与 foreign-language study 保留了两个课程对象。障碍在于原文说 some states have considered,选项只概括政策内容、不重复未实施状态;考生须回到题干的 considered 来补全语气,而不能因选项未写 considered 就误判。

    替代关系箭头 时间极紧时,直接用题干中的 considered 做“时态钩子”,定位到 第1段;不要从 coding 这个全文词开始读。随后只做一件事:在六项中寻找同时出现 coding 与 foreign-language 的“替代箭头”,将其与正确项核对。这个结构匹配比逐项翻译更快。

  2. 第 2 段 定位词 most educators agree foreign-language requirements

    What is the prevailing view among educators on using coding to meet foreign-language requirements?

    • A Coding should immediately replace all foreign-language classes.
    • B Elementary schools should stop teaching coding.
    • C Only students strong in languages should study coding.
    • D Coding should supplement, not displace, foreign-language classes.
    • E Foreign-language classes should be optional in every grade.
    • F Coding should be offered only after school.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项以 supplement 对应 added to curriculums,以 not displace 对应 not at the expense of foreign language classes,完整保留“增加而非替换”的双层判断。障碍是原文先承认 coding 应被加入,容易让考生只记住 added 而漏掉决定立场的 not。

    加换停三分法 用 requirements 这个制度词直达 第2段,再把选项压缩为“加”“换”“停”三个动作标签。正确项属于“加而不换”;这种动作分类能瞬间筛掉只谈 coding 教学必要性的选项。

  3. 第 3 段 定位词 more valuable than a natural language advocates

    Why do some advocates regard computer programming as more valuable than a natural language?

    • A It improves memory more quickly than bilingual education.
    • B It is easier for teachers to teach than foreign languages.
    • C It has already replaced natural languages in business.
    • D It requires no budget support from schools.
    • E It enables communication with machines and programs in the twenty-first century.
    • F It is the only skill needed for computer science jobs.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项重述了 programming allows people to communicate with machines and programs,并保留 21st century 的时代价值语境,构成倡导者价值判断的直接理由。障碍是把 language 从“人际自然语言”迁移为“人机 communication”,考生若机械理解 language,容易忽略这一论证跳跃。

    定义后的功能句 在 第3段 中,跳过背景数据,直接抓住 advocates argue 前后的“定义句+功能句”。将正确项视为功能句的同义改写;六级的理由题常把论证核心藏在定义后的解释中。

  4. 第 4 段 定位词 Modern Language Association of America foreign-language study

    What trend in foreign-language study is reported by the Modern Language Association of America?

    • A Language enrollments rose by more than 111,000 after 1995.
    • B Computer-related jobs lost 111,000 workers between 2009 and 2013.
    • C Foreign-language interest had been declining continuously since 1995.
    • D The seven largest STEM fields were related to foreign languages.
    • E Language enrollments declined by 8 percent by 2024.
    • F Higher-education language enrollments fell by more than 111,000 from 2009 to 2013.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项完整保留数据的指标 higher-education language enrollments、方向 fell、幅度 more than 111,000 与时间段 2009 to 2013。障碍是原文先说 interest is declining for the first time since 1995,后说 enrollment 数量;正确项要求考生不能把“兴趣首次下降”的起点误当成注册人数统计的起止时间。

    统计四槽同源 用机构名直接锁定 第4段,把原句写成“指标—方向—数值—时段”四个视觉槽;只有正确项四槽同源。无需通读段首 STEM 数据,防止被 top seven 诱导。

  5. 第 5 段 定位词 Senator Jeremy Ring choice

    What choice did Senator Jeremy Ring's bill seek to give Florida students?

    • A They could choose coding or a foreign language to satisfy admissions requirements.
    • B They could choose whether to attend university.
    • C They could replace two years of coding with mathematics.
    • D They could take coding only after failing a language class.
    • E They could avoid all high-school language courses.
    • F They could receive certified programming-teacher support.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项保留 choose between 的两个对象和 for the purpose of university admissions requirements 的目的,忠实重述法案。障碍在于原文提到 two years of language in high school,容易诱使考生误以为选择仅关乎学习年限;真正考点是课程可替代地满足 admissions requirement。

    A/B/目的三格 锁定 第5段 后,不必逐句细读引语;优先读取 introduced a bill 后的 that-clause,将其骨架化为“choose A/B—purpose C”。正确项是唯一同时填满三格的选项。

  6. 第 6 段 定位词 Florida bill fail to become law

    Why did the Florida bill fail to become law that year?

    • A It was defeated by a 35:5 vote in the state Senate.
    • B The full Legislature failed to take action on it.
    • C Educators withdrew their support for coding instruction.
    • D Florida universities rejected all computer science courses.
    • E Ring left office before introducing the bill.
    • F The bill lacked enough votes from computer programmers.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项直接同义重述 bill died 的原因,即 full Legislature failed to take action。障碍是前文的 passing 35:5 非常醒目;它只是 state Senate 的阶段性通过,不能替代整个 Legislature 的最终行动。

    最终关卡法 定位 第6段 后,使用“最后关卡法”:忽略先出现的票数,直接寻找全文中层级最高的程序主体 full Legislature;正确项就是该最终关卡未动作的同义表达。

  7. 第 7 段 定位词 Kentucky bill changed after educators complained

    How was the Kentucky bill changed after educators complained?

    • A It required universities to accept coding instead of foreign languages.
    • B It allowed substitution only after students failed a language class.
    • C It promoted computer science initiatives and dropped the foreign-language requirement issue.
    • D It eliminated certified teachers for programming classes.
    • E It made foreign-language requirements stricter.
    • F It postponed a report until November 2017.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    正确项同时覆盖 amended to promote computer science education initiatives 和 with no mention of foreign language requirements 两个改动方向。障碍在于其后 certified teachers 是具体支持措施,考生若只抓细枝末节,可能选到只说教师的半真项而遗漏法案的核心修订。

    州际隔离线 在 第7段 把 Kentucky 句切成“投诉→amended→新内容→删除内容”四段,且在读到 Washington 时立刻画竖线隔离。正确项同时命中新内容和删除内容,是最稳的双证据项。

  8. 第 8 段 定位词 Srini Mandyam struggle with them

    Why does Srini Mandyam oppose letting students forgo foreign languages because they struggle with them?

    • A Programming is easier than art, mathematics, and language.
    • B Only algebra can help students make informed decisions.
    • C Foreign languages should be replaced by chemistry for weak students.
    • D Difficult subjects remain essential to a well-rounded education.
    • E Students should study only the subjects they plan to pursue.
    • F Students who fail language classes should leave school early.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项概括了 every subject is a significant contribution to a well-rounded existence,以及 algebra 类比和 wide breadth of subjects 的结论。障碍是答案没有逐字复述 foreign language,而把论证上升为教育原则;这正是六级对例证归纳能力的考查。

    代入代数类比 定位 第8段 后,采用“删学科测试”:把每个选项代回 algebra 的类比中。只有正确项能解释为什么不因学生困难就取消一门重要课程;这种逆向类比验证快于逐字翻译长引语。

  9. 第 9 段 定位词 graduation role many U.S. jurisdictions

    What graduation role do computer science courses already play in many U.S. jurisdictions?

    • A They fulfill a foreign-language requirement in all fifty states.
    • B They replace university admissions requirements.
    • C They are mandatory for every student in the District of Columbia.
    • D They meet only science requirements, never mathematics requirements.
    • E They fulfill a mathematics or science high-school graduation requirement.
    • F They have been accepted for this purpose since 1995.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项精确复述 fulfill a math or science high school graduation requirement,并保留 or 的并列关系。障碍在于段后 advocates 希望它们 count as foreign language instead,容易让考生把倡导目标误认成 already 的现状。

    现状倡议切刀 在 第9段 用“already/ instead”对照切分句子:already 后面的内容对应事实,instead 后面的内容对应倡议。题干含 already,故正确项只能来自前半句。

  10. 第 10 段 定位词 critics remain wary substitute for foreign-language learning

    Why do critics remain wary of treating coding as a substitute for foreign-language learning?

    • A Programmers use mathematical regions of the brain to understand code.
    • B Bilingualism has no effect on memory or problem solving.
    • C English is no longer used in international business.
    • D Foreign-language students always earn higher salaries than programmers.
    • E Standardized tests should replace language instruction.
    • F Monolingualism puts people at a disadvantage in an international economy.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:F

    该项直接重述 critics 的理由:regardless of cognitive functions,being monolingual is a disadvantage in the increasingly international economy。障碍是前文关于 code 的脑区研究看似支持“coding is language”,但 critics 明确把争点从认知功能转向跨文化经济沟通。

    regardless后裁决 定位 第10段 后,直接圈出 regardless of,把其前后分为“让步证据”和“裁决理由”。题干含 remain wary,正确项必来自 regardless of 后面的裁决区。

  11. 第 11 段 定位词 Ted Zarrow shrinking world

    According to Ted Zarrow, how does learning languages help people address a shrinking world?

    • A It enables people to participate globally with mutual respect.
    • B It eliminates the world's growing problems.
    • C It makes computers understand cultural differences.
    • D It removes the need to learn about ethnicity.
    • E It guarantees success in every international business deal.
    • F It allows students to avoid coding classes.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:A

    该项整合 put ourselves at the global table 与 treat each other with mutual respect,并把语言作为实现二者的工具。障碍是原文末句 language is culture 表述抽象,正确项将其功能化概括,考生需从修辞性定义回推实际社会作用。

    从价值倒找功能 在 第11段 把引语尾部的 because language is culture 暂时当作价值结论,逆向寻找它前面可操作的结果:global table 与 mutual respect。正确项是这两个可见结果的合并改写。

  12. 第 12 段 定位词 Bureau of Labor by 2024

    What does the Bureau of Labor predict about demand for computer programmers by 2024?

    • A It will increase by 8 percent because salaries are high.
    • B It will decrease by 8 percent, or 26,500 jobs.
    • C It will remain unchanged at 55 percent.
    • D It will become the highest starting salary among all jobs.
    • E It will decline by 111,000 positions.
    • F It will decrease only for graduates with foreign-language fluency.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:B

    该项完整保留预测对象 demand for computer programmers、方向 decrease 及两种量化表达。障碍是段首 55 percent employers looked for computer skills 和 second highest starting salary 都是正面就业信号,命题人故意让它们与 However 后的下降预测并列。

    先判涨跌再对数 用 第12段 的年份切片直接跳到 2024,再执行“谓语优先”:不先记数字,先圈 demand 的谓语 decrease。正确项必须与该谓语同方向,数字只是二次复核。

  13. 第 13 段 定位词 Ring teach coding and languages substantially

    What practical concern leads Ring to doubt that schools can teach coding and languages substantially?

    • A Foreign-language skills are no longer important.
    • B Schools have too many certified programming teachers.
    • C School districts lack enough time in the school day.
    • D Students refuse to begin language learning early.
    • E Universities have removed all language admissions requirements.
    • F Coding cannot be taught before high school.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:C

    该项直接概括 because they lack the time in the school day,且保持 school districts 这一实施主体。障碍在于 Ring 接着说 language should start early,考生可能误选“外语不重要”或“高中两年足够”,但这些都不是其 doubting both 的现实原因。

    because后截取 在 第13段 使用“because 后截取法”:题干问 leads to doubt,就只读 doubt 后由 because 引出的短原因,正确项是其同义压缩;不要被前后关于语言重要性的立场句分散。

  14. 第 14 段 定位词 Zarrow propose into the school day

    What approach does Zarrow propose for fitting language learning into the school day?

    • A A program that replaces English with coding for half the day.
    • B A rule requiring students to fail a language class first.
    • C A plan to offer languages only in high school.
    • D An immersive dual-language program that divides the day between English and another language.
    • E A system that assigns all language teaching to universities.
    • F A policy that removes ethnicity from language education.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:D

    该项完整重述 immersive, dual language program 及 half the day in English and half in another language 的操作方式。障碍是“begin earlier”也正确地反映 Zarrow 的态度,却不能回答题干 how to fit learning into the school day,属于相关但答非所问。

    建议后的排班图 定位 第14段 后,直接搜 suggest 后面的第一个名词短语,再用 half the day 的数字结构验证。正确项是“方案名+时间分配”双组件,不需逐句处理后面的价值评价。

  15. 第 15 段 定位词 experts share school curricula

    What conclusion do coding and foreign-language experts share about school curricula?

    • A Coding should replace foreign languages because it is a twenty-first-century skill.
    • B Foreign-language instruction should be removed to save school time.
    • C Only computer science experts should decide curriculum policy.
    • D The two skill sets are identical and interchangeable.
    • E Schools should teach both skills rather than replace foreign languages with coding.
    • F Students should choose one skill and study it exclusively.
    显示答案与解析 收起答案与解析

    正确答案:E

    该项合并 negotiated into curriculums rather than replacing foreign language outright 与 education leaders must figure out a way to teach both,完整呈现最终结论。障碍在于文章多处承认 coding 的就业优势,容易诱导考生选择“coding should replace language”;但结论用 Though 和 rather than 明确否定这种单向替代。

    rather than+both 在 第15段 只抓两个结构词 rather than 与 both,将六个选项用“替代”或“并存”贴标签。正确项是唯一同时符合“并存+不替代”的选项;这是结论段最快的结构判定。

STRUCTURE · 篇章结构

6 个意群的议论文骨架

按议论文 的行文骨架切分意群,每个意群标注它覆盖的段落与对主旨的作用——逐段读完后回到这里俯瞰全篇,能看清作者为什么按这个顺序行文。

  1. 引言 P1 P2

    编程能否替代外语的争议背景

    这个 introductory section 首先 present 了一个 educational trend:越来越多的 K-12 schools 正在将 computer coding 纳入 curriculum。接着直接 introduce 核心 debate:某些 states 考虑让 students forgo foreign language 来学 coding,但遭到 educators 的 opposition。第二段进一步 clarify 这个 debate 的 complexity,指出虽然关于 elementary schools 教 coding 存在 fierce opinions,但大多数 educators 在 foreign language requirement 这个 issue 上达成 consensus:coding 应该 be added,但 not at the expense of language classes。

    这个 opening section 通过 presenting the controversy,为整篇 argumentative article 建立 foundation。它不仅 introduce 了 central question(coding vs. foreign language),还 preview 了文章的 stance:most educators 反对 simple replacement。这种 framing 为后续的 detailed arguments 和 evidence 设定了 direction。

    提出核心争议问题
  2. 分论点 P3 P4

    支持编程替代外语的理由与现状

    这个 section 系统地 present 支持 coding replacement 的 arguments 和 evidence。第3段 提供 conceptual rationale:coding 是 language of communication with machines,是 21st century 的 more valuable skill,而 education system 因为 budget constraints 和 teacher training 不足而 struggle to keep up。第4段 用 concrete data 支撑:computer science jobs boost wages,occupy top STEM positions,而 foreign language enrollment 自 1995 年来首次 decline,between 2009-2013 减少超过 111,000 spots。这些 statistics 强化了 coding 的 economic value 和 language 的 declining relevance。

    这个 section 通过 presenting pro-replacement arguments,establish 文章需要 address 的 one side of debate。它展示了 advocates' logic(conceptual + empirical),让 readers 理解 why this proposal exists。但同时,通过 relatively brief treatment 和后续更 extensive 的 counterarguments,文章 implicitly signal 这不是它 ultimately support 的 position。这种 balanced presentation 增强了 article 的 credibility。

    呈现替代方案的支持依据
  3. 各州立法尝试的具体案例

    这个 section 通过 four state examples 展示 concrete legislative efforts。Florida 的 Senator Ring introduce bill 允许 students choose between language and coding for university admission requirements,虽然 passed Senate 35:5 但最终 died when full Legislature failed to act,Ring 预测 identical bill 会被 reintroduced。Kentucky bill 遭遇 educators' complaints 后被 amended,转而 promote computer science education without mentioning language requirements。Washington bill 提议 public universities accept two years of CS in place of language。Texas 在 2013 年 passed bill,但只允许在 students attempted and performed poorly in language 后才能 substitute coding。这些 cases 展示了 different approaches 和 varying degrees of success。

    这个 case study section serve multiple functions:first,它 demonstrate 这不是 theoretical debate 而是 real policy issue;second,通过 showing bills' failures, modifications, and compromises,it subtly undermine 简单 replacement 的 feasibility;third,各州的 different approaches 暗示 complexity of the issue。这些 legislative struggles 为后续 educators' arguments against replacement 提供 practical context,showing that even advocates face significant obstacles。

    展示替代政策的实施困境
  4. 反对编程替代外语的教育价值论证

    这个 critical section present 反对 replacement 的 core arguments,heavily emphasizing foreign language 的 irreplaceable value。第9段 首先 acknowledge 28 states 已让 CS courses fulfill math/science requirement,然后 pivot:advocates 想让它 count as language,但 opponents stress balancing both skills。第10段 提供 powerful scientific evidence:studies show bilingualism correlates with cognitive development, intelligence, memory, problem-solving;foreign language students outperform non-language peers on standardized tests after only 2-3 years;even though 2014 research suggests programmers use language brain regions,critics remain wary because monolingualism 是 disadvantage in international economy。第11段 通过 award-winning teacher Zarrow 的 voice 升华:world is shrinking but problems growing,language learning enables mutual respect and global participation because "language is culture"。

    这是文章 argumentative core 中最 substantial 的 section,它 establish 反对 replacement 的 compelling rationale。通过 combining scientific research, cognitive benefits, economic considerations, and cultural dimensions,它 build 一个 multi-layered case for language education。这个 section 的 weight and depth 相比 earlier pro-replacement arguments,clearly signal 文章的 ultimate stance。它为 conclusion 中的 compromise position(teach both)提供 solid foundation。

    论证语言学习不可替代性
  5. 现实考量与双方观点的调和讨论

    这个 nuanced section 引入 complicating factors 并探索 potential reconciliation。第12段 present market reality 的 apparent contradiction:虽然 language skills have cognitive benefits,但 55% employers look for computer skills on resumes,study abroad and language fluency 不太 influential in hiring;然而 computer science grads 虽有 second highest starting salary,BLS predicts programmer demand 将 decrease 8% by 2024。第13段 中 Ring acknowledge language importance 但 doubt schools 能 work both into curriculum in significant way 因为 lack time。第14段 由 Zarrow respond:language education should start earlier,且通过 immersive dual language programs 完全 possible to work both in evenly,这种 approach 已在多校 successfully implemented,并能 foster respect for diversity and language。

    这个 section 通过 introducing practical constraints 和 potential solutions,move the debate from theoretical opposition 到 pragmatic problem-solving。它 acknowledge real challenges(market pressures,time constraints)但也 present viable alternatives(dual language programs)。这种 balanced treatment of complications 和 solutions 为 final position 做铺垫,showing that compromise 不仅 necessary 而且 achievable。它防止文章 sound too idealistic by addressing practical concerns。

    探讨双管齐下的可行性
  6. 结论 P15

    最终立场:双方技能均不可缺

    这个 concluding paragraph 明确 articulate 文章的 final position,synthesizing all previous arguments。它首先 acknowledge:"Though the benefits of computer programming skills are vast",然后 state clear consensus:"foreign language and coding experts agree that computer science should be negotiated into curriculums rather than replacing foreign language outright"。接着通过 Tynker co-founder Mandyam 的 statement reinforce this position:两种 skill sets 都是 essential but unrelated,coding 是 incredibly important 21st century skill,但 not comparable to foreign language,losing language for coding 的 sake would be "a shame"。最后以 strong call to action 结束:"education leaders must figure out a way to teach both",明确指出正确的 direction 是 integration rather than substitution。

    这个 conclusion 通过 clearly stating the consensus position,resolve 整篇文章 explored 的 debate。它不仅 reaffirm 反对 replacement,还 point toward positive solution(teach both)。使用 industry expert 的 voice(Mandyam from coding company)特别 strategic:even someone from coding field 反对 replacement,这 strengthen credibility。"Must figure out a way" 的 imperative tone 给文章 decisive ending,leaving readers with clear understanding of 正确 path forward。

    明确反对替代的终极立场
MAIN IDEA · 速判主旨

5 步定位这篇文章的主旨

不读完全篇也能锁定主旨——以下 5 步按2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 这篇原文的实际行文顺序给出,每步说明看哪里、看出什么,可直接迁移到其他英语六级文章。

  1. 标题+首段锁定争议话题 P1

    议论文的 central issue 通常在 opening paragraphs 就会明确呈现。Title 以 question form 出现时,往往预示着文章会 present different perspectives。首段的 'despite opposition' 这类 conflict marker 直接揭示了文章的 argumentative nature。

  2. 第二段捕获立场声明 P2

    议论文必然有 author's position,这个 position 往往用 consensus language(most educators agree)或 clear stance markers(should be... but not)来表达。第2段 的 'though' 和 'most educators agree' 是典型的 position indicators,表明作者在 presenting a dominant view。

  3. 议论文通常采用 point-counterpoint structure 或 problem-solution pattern。通过扫描每段的 first sentence,能快速把握文章的 logical flow。这篇文章先 present 一方 viewpoint(coding advocates),再 present 另一方 reasoning(language defenders),最后 discuss integration approaches,这是典型的 balanced argumentation。

  4. 结尾段确认综合立场 P15

    议论文的 conclusion 会 restate 或 synthesize main argument。第15段 的 'experts agree' 和 'must figure out' 表明这是 final position。关键词 'negotiated' 和 'rather than replacing' 呼应了 第2段 的 'not at the expense of',形成 argument closure。

  5. 四步信息综合提炼主旨 P1 P2 P15

    议论文主旨是所有 key components 的 synthesis。不能只看一个 section,而要 verify 各部分的 consistency。这篇文章的每个 section 都在强化同一个 message:acknowledge coding's value,但 emphasize 保留 language education,最终 advocate for integration,这就是文章的 throughline。

主旨信号词 opposition P1 most educators agree P2 but not at the expense of P2 benefits P10 however P10 should be negotiated... rather than replacing P15

MAIN IDEA · 主旨

这篇文章在说什么

这篇议论文探讨了编程是否应该取代K-12教育中的外语要求。虽然承认编程日益重要,但大多数教育工作者认为这两种技能因不同原因都至关重要——编程用于技术能力培养,外语用于认知发展和全球交流——并主张在不取消外语要求的前提下整合编程教育。
This argumentative article debates whether coding should replace foreign language requirements in K-12 education. While acknowledging coding's growing importance, most educators argue both skills are essential for different reasons—coding for technical competency, foreign languages for cognitive development and global communication—and advocate integrating coding without eliminating language requirements.
WORD INFERENCE · 生词推断

5 个生词的上下文推断

不查词典,只用文中线索推出词义——每个词给出推断出的释义与 完整推理链。已收录进英语六级高频真题词集的单词可点击进入词条页。

  • outperform 表现优于、胜过

    让我们把这些 clues 串联起来。首先,context 告诉我们这是在讨论 foreign language students 和 non-foreign language peers 在 standardized tests 上的 comparison。其次,构词法显示 out- prefix 有'超过'的含义,而 perform 是'表现'。最后,sentence structure 用 A outperformed B 的 pattern,配合 only two to three years 这个 time frame,强调了即使 duration 不长也产生了 positive result。综合这三条 evidence,我们可以确定 outperform 表达的是'在表现上超过、胜过'的意思。

    语境构词句式三维印证
  • forgo 放弃、舍弃

    让我们把 evidence 整合起来。第一处 context 显示 forgo 用于 allow students to forgo A for B 的 structure,暗示用 B 来 replace A。第二处 context 提供了 causal reason——students struggle with foreign language,所以可以 forgo it,这符合'放弃困难事物'的 logic。最后,整篇 article 的 central theme 是 substitution debate,forgo 作为 key verb 必然表达'舍弃原选项'的 action。三条 clues 共同指向同一个 meaning。

    多点复现主题印证
  • monolingual 单语的、只会一种语言的

    让我们串联这些 reasoning。首先,textual contrast 显示 monolingual 和 bilingualism 是 opposite concepts。其次,morphological analysis 表明 mono- 表示'单一',lingual 涉及 language。最后,contextual logic 证实在 international context 中,monolingual 作为 disadvantage 的 rationale 是 language limitation。三条 evidence chains 都指向'单语'这个 core meaning。

    对比词根语境逻辑链
  • wary 谨慎的、警惕的、持怀疑态度的

    让我们整合这些 analytical threads。首先,转折 structure 显示 wary 代表 critics 对 research findings 的 contrary attitude。其次,subsequent explanation 表明这种 attitude 是'不被新 evidence 说服'的 stance。最后,整个 argumentative framework 确认 wary 是 skepticism 或 caution 的 expression。所有 clues 都指向'谨慎的、持怀疑态度的'这个 meaning。

    转折阐释论证定位
  • fare 进展、表现

    让我们把这些 threads 编织起来。第一,semantic parallel 显示 don't fare well 和 struggle 在 meaning 上相近,都描述 negative performance。第二,logical structure 表明 fare poorly 是 potential reason for elimination,说明它涉及 performance evaluation。第三,rhetorical function 要求 fare 在 analogy 中和 struggle 扮演相同的 role。这三个 dimensions 共同确认 fare 表示'进展、表现'。

    平行结构修辞逻辑
RHETORIC · 修辞手法

8 处修辞手法与仿写

每处修辞给出它在本文的具体用法、同类信号词清单与一份可直接套用的 写作仿写建议——读完能认,也能写。

  • 引用论证

    P5 P6 P8 P11 P13 P14 P15

    文章引用了 Florida state Senator Jeremy Ring 的 direct speech,他说 "I think the opportunity to give people a choice is important",这个 quote 直接支持了 coding 应该成为 alternative option 的观点。通过 politician 的 voice,作者增强了 argument 的 authority 和 credibility,让读者感受到这不仅是 educational debate,更是 policy-level 的 consideration。这种 expert testimony 让 pro-coding 的 stance 更具 persuasive power。

    信号词 says according to argues claims states notes points out emphasizes believes suggests

    仿写: 当你想 strengthen 某个 viewpoint 时,可以 strategically insert 相关领域 expert 的 statement。首先 identify 你需要 support 的 claim,然后 find authoritative voice 来 echo 这个观点。记得 introduce the source 的 credentials,这样 readers 才能 appreciate 这个 quote 的 weight。仿写模版:According to [职位/身份], [人名], "[直接引语]". This perspective highlights [该引语如何支持你的论点].

  • 举例论证

    P6 P7 P8

    文章用 Florida、Kentucky、Washington 和 Texas 这些 concrete state examples 来 illustrate different approaches 对待 coding vs. foreign language 的 policy attempts。这些 specific cases 让 abstract debate 变得 tangible and real。比如 Florida bill 的 35:5 passing ratio 和最终 failure,Texas 的 compromise solution (只有在 foreign language 表现 poorly 才能 substitute),这些 detailed instances 展示了 nationwide struggle 和 diverse perspectives,让读者理解这是 complex issue with multiple solutions being tested。

    信号词 for example for instance such as consider take the case of specifically in particular to illustrate namely

    仿写: 当你提出 broad statement 时,immediately follow up with concrete examples。选择 representative cases that readers can identify with。Structure 可以是:先 present general claim,然后用 "For example" 或 "Consider the case of" 引入 specific instance,最后 tie back 这个 example 如何 illustrate 你的 point。仿写模版:[General claim]. For instance, [具体例子with details]. This case demonstrates [例子如何支持论点], showing that [broader implication].

  • 引用论证

    P4 P9 P10 P12

    文章 cite 了 multiple authoritative sources including 2016 U.S. News/Raytheon STEM Index、Modern Language Association of America 的 enrollment data、以及 National Association of Colleges and Employers' 2016 report。这些 statistical evidence 和 research findings 为 both sides of the debate 提供了 solid factual foundation。比如 computer science jobs boosting wages 的 data support coding importance,而 bilingualism 与 cognitive development 的 correlation studies defend foreign language value。这种 data-driven approach 让 argument 从 opinion-based 变成 evidence-based。

    信号词 according to data shows statistics indicate research reveals studies show evidence suggests findings demonstrate reports indicate surveys show

    仿写: 当你需要 prove a trend 或 establish factual basis 时,incorporate statistical evidence。Format 应包括:source identification + specific data + interpretation。记得 contextualize numbers——不要 just drop statistics,要 explain what they mean for your argument。仿写模版:According to [权威机构/研究], [具体数据/发现]. These figures reveal that [数据的含义], which supports the view that [你的论点].

  • 对比论证

    P2 P3 P4 P9 P10 P12

    整篇文章构建在 coding vs. foreign language 的 central contrast 之上。作者 systematically present both sides:一边是 coding 的 economic value、job market demand 和 21st century relevance,另一边是 foreign language 的 cognitive benefits、cultural understanding 和 global communication necessity。这种 sustained comparison 贯穿全文,比如 第4段 对比 computer science jobs 增长 vs. foreign language enrollment 下降,第12段 对比 employer preferences for computer skills vs. language fluency 的 limited influence。这个 rhetorical strategy 让 readers 能 weigh both perspectives 并理解 the complexity of the issue。

    信号词 while whereas on the other hand in contrast however conversely unlike but yet although nevertheless despite

    仿写: 建立 effective contrast 需要 identify two comparable elements with significant differences。Structure 可以用 point-by-point (每个点都对比) 或 block method (先讲完一方再讲另一方)。关键是 maintain balance——给 both sides fair representation。最后 synthesize the comparison 来 support your thesis。仿写模版:While [观点A] emphasizes [A的优势], [观点B] highlights [B的优势]. On one hand, [具体对比点1]; on the other hand, [具体对比点2]. This contrast reveals that [综合洞察].

  • 类比论证

    P8

    Mandyam 在 第8段 使用了 powerful analogy:将 coding 与 algebra 进行 parallel comparison。他说 "Many students don't fare well with algebra but we never discuss eliminating it",这个 analogy 的 logic 是:just as we don't remove algebra despite student struggles (因为它 fundamental),我们也不应该因为学生 struggle with foreign language 就 replace it with coding。这个 comparison 通过 familiar subject (algebra) 来 illuminate 对 foreign language 的态度应该是什么,揭示了 double standard 的问题。

    信号词 just as similarly like in the same way analogous to comparable to parallel to just like as with

    仿写: 构建 analogy 时,find a comparable situation that your audience already accepts 或 understands。确保 the parallel is genuine——两个 situations 必须在 relevant aspects truly similar。Present the analogy clearly,然后 explicitly draw the connection to your argument。仿写模版:Just as [熟悉情况A] demonstrates [某个原则], [当前讨论的情况B] should similarly [遵循相同原则]. We wouldn't [在A情况中做某事], so why would we [在B情况中做类似的事]? This parallel suggests that [结论].

  • 因果论证

    P3 P10

    文章在多处建立 causal relationships 来 support different claims。比如 第3段 解释为什么 coding 应该加入:"The computer science field is growing faster than schools can keep up because of budget constraints and a lack of skills training"——这里 establish cause (预算限制和教师培训不足) and effect (学校跟不上需求)。第10段 展示 foreign language learning 导致的 positive outcomes:"bilingualism correlates with cognitive development" 和 "foreign language students outperformed their non-foreign language peers"。这些 cause-effect chains 帮助 readers understand not just what is happening,而是 why it matters。

    信号词 because since as a result therefore thus consequently leads to results in causes due to owing to so that

    仿写: 建立 causal argument 时,clearly identify your cause 和 effect。Explain the mechanism——how does X lead to Y? 提供 evidence supporting the causal link (not just correlation)。考虑 alternative explanations 并 address them。仿写模版:[现象/行动X] leads to/results in/causes [结果Y] because [解释因果机制]. Evidence for this causal relationship includes [支持性证据]. This demonstrates that [因果关系的含义].

  • 比喻修辞

    P11

    文章用 "Our world is shrinking but its problems are really growing" (第11段) 这个 metaphorical expression 来 describe globalization。"Shrinking world" 生动地 capture 了 how interconnected 我们的 planet has become through technology and communication,而 "growing problems" emphasize increasing complexity of global challenges。这个 figurative language 比 literal description more powerful and memorable,让 readers immediately grasp why cross-cultural communication (through language) is essential。

    信号词 like as metaphorically speaking in other words so to speak is a represents

    仿写: 创造 effective metaphor 时,find concrete image or familiar concept that shares key characteristics with your abstract idea。Make sure the comparison illuminates rather than confuses。用 vivid, sensory language 来 bring the metaphor to life。可以 extend metaphor through related imagery。仿写模版:[抽象概念] is like [具体意象/现象], where [展开比喻的相似点]. This captures how [比喻揭示的洞察].

  • 排比修辞

    P14

    第14段 中 Zarrow 使用了 parallel structure with repetition:"The study of language fosters a respect for diversity, a respect for ethnicity and really a respect for language." 三个 "a respect for" 的 repetition creates rhythmic emphasis,强化了 language learning 带来的 multiple dimensions of respect。这种 parallelism makes the statement more memorable and powerful,accumulated effect 让 readers feel the comprehensive value of language education。

    信号词 and or not only...but also both...and either...or neither...nor first...second...third

    仿写: 构建 effective parallelism,choose a grammatical structure 和 repeat it across multiple items with varying content。可以 repeat key words (anaphora) 或 just maintain parallel syntax。确保 each item in the series contributes meaningfully——不要 just for the sake of pattern。三个 items 是 common effective number。仿写模版:[Action/concept] leads to [result A], [result B], and [result C]. / We need [parallel phrase 1], [parallel phrase 2], and [parallel phrase 3] to achieve [goal].

IMPLIED MEANING · 言外之意

5 处话里有话

作者没有明说、但靠信号词传递出来的态度与暗示——每处给出原文片段、信号词类型与解读。

  • 虽然现状如此,但教育界并不买账的立场

    P1
    Some states have considered allowing students to forgo foreign language for coding classes, despite opposition from educators.

    让步转折类 despite opposition from educators despite in spite of although while even though nevertheless

    这句话的言外之意是,虽然一些 state governments 正在推进政策,但这种做法在教育本质上是 problematic 的。它通过让步结构突出了 educators 的反对意见,暗示了文章的主旨将倾向于保护 foreign language 的地位,为后文的 debate 埋下伏笔。

  • 借妥协之名,行保护之实的共识

    P2
    Coding should be added to curriculums, but not at the expense of foreign language classes.

    否定限制类 but not at the expense of not at the expense of not to the detriment of without compromising provided that on the condition that

    其言外之意非常明确:虽然 coding 很重要,但它绝不能 replace 外语课。作者借用 educators 的共识,传达出一种 non-negotiable 的态度,即外语的 education value 是不可替代的,这直接 support 了文章不赞成用编程取代外语的主旨。

  • 通过反例对比暗示政策的荒谬性

    P8
    Many students don't fare well with algebra but we never discuss eliminating it.

    类比反证类 we never discuss eliminating it we never similarly by the same token likewise it would be like

    Mandyam 的言外之意是:仅仅因为学生 struggle 就放弃一门学科是极其 narrow-minded 的。他用代数作为 anchor,暗示如果因为困难就取消外语,那教育系统就会 collapse。这有力地反驳了 第8段 中提到的 Texas 政策,强调了教育的 well-roundedness。

  • 即便事实如此,也无法掩盖长远劣势

    P10
    They say that regardless of cognitive functions, being monolingual is a disadvantage in the increasingly international economy.

    让步排除类 regardless of cognitive functions regardless of irrespective of no matter setting aside notwithstanding

    言外之意是即使我们不谈 brain development,单从现实的 global business 角度来看,只懂一种语言也是一种 fatal weakness。它消解了编程可能具有的类似认知功能带来的辩护力,强调了外语在 international communication 中不可动摇的价值。

  • 对未来就业前景的隐晦警示

    P12
    However, although 2016 computer science graduates can expect to make... the Bureau of Labor predicts the demand for computer programmers will decrease 8 percent.

    对比预警类 However... predicts... will decrease however on the contrary yet predict anticipate

    言外之意是在警告那些盲目崇拜 coding 的人:不要以为掌握了编程就一劳永逸。劳工统计局的 prediction 暗示编程岗位的 demand 正在饱和。这降低了 coding 相对于外语的 long-term 优势,从而支持了不应 sacrifice 外语课来追求编程的观点。

AUTHOR ATTITUDE · 作者态度

作者态度:客观中立

结论先行:本文作者态度为客观中立( balanced but leaning toward integration of both)。下面是按步骤还原的判断过程与文中的态度信号词。

  1. 标题提问+首段呈现争议双方 P1

    议论文的 title 如果是 question form,通常 signals 作者会 explore multiple perspectives 而不是单一 stance。Opening paragraph 提到 'opposition from educators' 表明作者 acknowledges 争议的 existence,这是 balanced reporting 的 marker。

  2. 第二段明确共识立场 P2

    这个 explicit statement 在 early position(第二段)出现,directly addresses 文章的 central question。'Most educators agree' 这种 attribution 表明作者在 reporting consensus 而非 imposing personal view,但 choice of highlighting this particular consensus 透露作者的 sympathetic stance toward this balanced approach。

  3. 作者 dedicates comparable篇幅 to both sides,这 indicates balanced treatment。Crucially,作者 doesn't dismiss either side's arguments——coding advocates get their 'growing field' and 'boost wages' points (第3段-4),language advocates get their 'cognitive development' and 'global communication' points (第10段-11)。This equal treatment signals objectivity。

  4. 结尾呼吁两者兼顾 P14 P15

    议论文的 conclusion typically reveals 作者最 committed to 的 position。这里作者 chooses to end with 'experts agree' 和 'must figure out a way to teach both',而不是 declaring a winner in the debate。The word 'negotiated' 和 'rather than replacing' 强调 compromise and integration,这 confirms 作者的 balanced but solution-oriented attitude。

  5. 框架结构引导融合方案 P1 P2 P14 P15

    议论文作者的 attitude 不仅在 explicit statements 中,更在 how they frame the entire discussion。这篇文章把 'add coding but keep language' 作为 opening thesis 和 closing resolution,这种 strategic positioning makes this view seem like the reasonable middle ground。虽然作者 presents opposing views fairly,the architecture of the argument guides readers toward integration as the sensible conclusion。

文中的态度信号词

  • opposition P1

    'Opposition' 出现在 opening sentence immediately signals 这是一个 contested issue with multiple viewpoints。作者 acknowledging 'opposition from educators' shows 尊重 dissenting voices,这是 balanced reporting 的 marker,而不是 one-sided advocacy。

    同类词 debate fierce opinions critics complaints wary

  • though P2

    'Though' 在 'When it comes to allowing coding to fill foreign language requirements, though, most educators agree' 这个 sentence 中 functions as a pivot point。它 contrasts 前面提到的 'fierce opinions on each side' with 一个 emerging consensus,showing 作者在 navigate complex terrain 并 identifying common ground。

    同类词 however but despite while on the other hand

  • but not at the expense of P2

    这个 phrase 是文章的 thesis statement 的 core。'But not at the expense of' 明确表达一个 qualified position——支持 adding coding 但 rejecting replacement of language。这种 qualified support 是 balanced attitude 的 linguistic signature,showing 作者 supports innovation without sacrificing existing value。

    同类词 rather than replacing should be negotiated into in addition to alongside both... and

  • advocates argue P3

    'Advocates argue' 是 attribution phrase,作者 using it to present coding supporters' viewpoint while maintaining distance。这种 attribution maintains objectivity——作者不是 asserting these claims as fact,而是 reporting what one side believes。这 indicates 作者作为 neutral presenter of views。

    同类词 some argue proponents claim supporters say critics stress opponents maintain

  • Studies show P10

    'Studies show that bilingualism correlates with cognitive development' introduces empirical evidence supporting foreign language education。作者 citing specific studies (2007 study, 2014 report) lends credibility to language advocates' position,showing 作者 takes their arguments seriously and doesn't dismiss them as mere opinion。

    同类词 Research indicates According to Data suggests Evidence demonstrates A 2007 study showed

  • agree P15

    'Foreign language and coding experts agree that computer science should be negotiated into curriculums' appears in the concluding paragraph,presenting agreement between previously opposed camps。这个 'agree' signals 作者在 highlighting convergence and shared wisdom rather than continued conflict,guiding readers toward 一个 integrative solution。

    同类词 consensus both... concur shared view common ground mutual understanding

  • must figure out a way P15

    'Education leaders must figure out a way to teach both' 是文章的 final statement,用 'must' 这个 strong modal verb 来 express necessity。作者 choosing to end with this imperative reveals 虽然 overall tone is objective,但作者 clearly believes integration is not just preferable but necessary——这是 mild prescriptive stance within objective framing。

    同类词 need to find should explore have to balance necessary to integrate imperative to include

GENRE · 速判体裁

30 秒判定这是一篇议论文

体裁决定读法与出题套路。以下判断步骤与标志词全部以本文为例,可直接迁移到其他英语六级 真题文章。

如何快速判断这是一篇议论文?

  1. 开篇争议性问题 P1

    本文 title 用 question form 提出'编程是否算外语',第1段 立即介绍这个 debate 的 background,表明这是一个有 opposition 的议题。说明文会直接解释概念,新闻报道会陈述事件,而议论文会 frame 一个需要论证的问题。

  2. 对立观点明示 P2

    第2段 直接说'There's a debate'并且提到'fierce opinions on each side'和'most educators agree',明确展示了 multiple viewpoints 的存在。说明文不会强调观点对立,新闻报道可能提及不同声音但不会深入 argue,只有议论文会 systematically present 并 evaluate 各方立场。

  3. 论证链条构建 P3 P4 P5 P6

    第3段-第6段 密集呈现支持 coding-as-language 的 arguments:技术语言论、job market data、政策 bills 等。第4段 用具体的 statistics 支撑,第5段 引用 politician 的 quote。这种 sustained argumentation with evidence 是议论文特有的,说明文只会 inform,新闻报道会 report 但不会如此 systematically advocate。

  4. 反方论证呈现 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11

    第7段-第11段 转向 opponents' perspective,详细论述为何 foreign language 不应被替代:cognitive benefits、cultural value、bilingualism advantages 等。第8段 的 Mandyam quote 直接 refute 支持方的逻辑。这种 thesis-antithesis 结构是议论文的标志,说明文没有 argumentation,新闻报道不会 systematically present rebuttals。

  5. 第12段-第15段 最终 converge 到一个 synthesized position:'experts agree that computer science should be negotiated into curriculums rather than replacing foreign language outright'。这个 compromise recommendation 基于前文的 argumentation。说明文结尾只会 summarize information,新闻报道不会 prescribe solutions,只有议论文会 culminate in a reasoned stance。

  6. 本文完整展现了 argumentative essay 的 canonical structure:提出 should coding replace foreign language 的问题,呈现 proponents 的经济和实用 arguments,展开 opponents 的认知和文化 counterarguments,最终 advocate 一个 balanced approach。整个 discourse 的 purpose 不是 inform(说明文)也不是 report events(新闻),而是通过 systematic reasoning persuade readers 接受某种立场。

哪些词暴露了议论文体裁?

  • There's a debate over P2 争议引入词 debate whether controversy surrounding disagreement about dispute over contentious issue
  • despite opposition from P1 对立立场标识词 opponents argue critics claim in contrast however on the other hand
  • most educators agree P2 立场表态词 advocates argue I think I believe experts agree should be
  • some advocates argue P3 观点引导词 advocates of the bills say opponents stress critics say Ring says Mandyam believes
  • though P2 论证逻辑连接词 although while but however on the other hand
  • should be added... but not at the expense of P2 立场表态词 should be should not must need to ought to
  • opponents stress the importance of P9 观点引导词 opponents stress advocates say critics remain wary proponents argue supporters claim
  • I think P5 立场表态词 I believe I just think in my opinion from my perspective as I see it
  • believes P8 观点引导词 thinks considers regards views holds that
  • it would be a shame P15 立场表态词 unfortunately regrettably it is crucial it is essential the problem is
SENTENCE INSIGHTS · 句子精讲

17 句真题句逐层精讲

下列真题句各有独立的句子解析页——中文翻译、结构树逐层拆解、成分与时态、考点讲解与真题高频词。点击句子进入完整解析。

FAQ · 常见问题

关于 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 的常见问题

2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section B 文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 的原文出自哪里?
U.S. New & World Report《美国新闻和世界报道》2016年10月13 日文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language(有人说计算机编程是一门外语)。
2022年9月英语六级真题第1套文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 的主旨是什么?
2022年9月英语六级真题第1套 Part III Section B 文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 议论文探讨了编程是否应该取代K-12教育中的外语要求。虽然承认编程日益重要,但大多数教育工作者认为这两种技能因不同原因都至关重要——编程用于技术能力培养,外语用于认知发展和全球交流——并主张在不取消外语要求的前提下整合编程教育。(英文表述:This argumentative article debates whether coding should replace foreign language requirements in K-12 education. While acknowledging coding's growing importance, most educators argue both skills are essential for different reasons—coding for technical competency, foreign languages for cognitive development and global communication—and advocate integrating coding without eliminating language requirements.)
Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language(2022年9月英语六级真题第1套文章)是什么体裁?难度如何?
体裁为议论文,作者立场是客观中立(balanced but leaning toward integration of both)。CEFR 难度 C1,全文 1200 词、15 段;在英语六级全部 593 篇真题文章中,C1 级共 343 篇(占 58%)。
2022年9月英语六级真题第1套文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 的篇章结构是怎样的?
全文 15 段按议论文骨架分为 6 个意群:引言 · 第1段、第2段——编程能否替代外语的争议背景;分论点 · 第3段、第4段——支持编程替代外语的理由与现状;分论点 · 第5段、第6段、第7段、第8段——各州立法尝试的具体案例;分论点 · 第9段、第10段、第11段——反对编程替代外语的教育价值论证;分论点 · 第12段、第13段、第14段——现实考量与双方观点的调和讨论;结论 · 第15段——最终立场:双方技能均不可缺。
Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 一文的作者态度是什么?
作者态度是客观中立(balanced but leaning toward integration of both)。判断路径:标题提问+首段呈现争议双方 → 第二段明确共识立场 → 双方论据等量呈现 → 结尾呼吁两者兼顾 → 框架结构引导融合方案;文中的态度信号词包括 opposition(第1段)、though(第2段)、but not at the expense of(第2段)、advocates argue(第3段)、Studies show(第10段)、agree(第15段)、must figure out a way(第15段)。
2022年9月英语六级真题第1套文章 Some Say Computer Coding ls a Foreign language 中有哪些值得积累的生词?
按文中出现顺序共 5 个:outperform(表现优于、胜过)、forgo(放弃、舍弃)、monolingual(单语的、只会一种语言的)、wary(谨慎的、警惕的、持怀疑态度的)、fare(进展、表现),每个词的词义都可以由文中上下文线索推断得出。

本页数据最后更新: