2016年6月·第2套 英语六级阅读理解（四选一） 第 1 篇 · 46–50 题答案与解析

What do the revised "Green Guides" require businesses to do? 直接问规则要求做什么，答案应是原文规定句的客观转述。

主干 What do the revised "Green Guides" require businesses to do，疑问代词 What 作 do 的宾语；revised 作前置定语修饰 Green Guides，businesses 是 require 的宾语，to do 为不定式作宾语补足语。结构平铺直叙，无陷阱。

• A)无中生有

  Manufacture as many green products as possible 把对"宣传方式"的规定偷换为对"生产数量"的要求，原文从未提及。

• B)以偏概全

  原文 such as how much of the product is recycled 用 such as 把"可回收"作举例，Indicate whether their products are recyclable 却把这一例子当作唯一要求。

• C)✓ 正确
  • limit them to a specific benefit, such as how much of the product is recycled↔Specify in what way their products are green
  • qualify their claims↔Specify

  C 项把"加以限定"和"指明具体益处"两层语义合并为一句"specify in what way their products are green"，与预判完全吻合。

• D)与原文相反

  原文 warn marketers against using labels that make broad claims 是"警告别乱贴宽泛标签"，Attach green labels to all of their products 反过来要求"全部贴绿标"。

What do the revised "Green Guides" require businesses to do? 仍是直问规则要求的细节题。

结构与 46 题完全相同：What 作 do 的宾语，revised 修饰 Green Guides，businesses 作 require 的宾语，to do 作宾补；无理解陷阱。

• A)无中生有

  Manufacture as many green products as possible 与原文"宣传方式"无关。

• B)以偏概全

  Indicate whether their products are recyclable 把原文 such as how much of the product is recycled 这一例子当作唯一要求。

• C)✓ 正确
  • limit them to a specific benefit↔Specify in what way their products are green

  C 项把"加以限定"与"指明具体益处"合并为一句，与预判完全一致。

• D)与原文相反

  原文 warn marketers against using labels that make broad claims 是"警告别乱贴"，Attach green labels to all of their products 反过来要求"全贴"。

What was SC Johnson accused of in the class-action lawsuits? 直接问被指控的具体内容，对应原文叙述句。

主干 What was SC Johnson accused of，被动语态：SC Johnson 是受动者；in the class-action lawsuits 作时间/事件状语，限定指控发生的场合。注意 accused of 后接的是"指控的内容"，原文对应表达可能是 misleading/gave the impression that…，需识别这一对应。

• A)偷换概念

  It gave consumers the impression that all its products were truly green 把指控重点从"经第三方认证"偷换为"产品全都真正环保"，且 all 与 truly 在原文均无对应。

• B)与原文相反

  It gave a third party the authority to label its products as environmentally friendly 说"授权第三方贴标"，正是原文否认的——原文为 the certification was the company's own，反向陈述。

• C)✓ 正确
  • the label was misleading↔It misled consumers
  • gave the impression that the products had been certified by a third party↔to believe that its products had been certified by a third party

  C 项把"标签误导"与"让人以为经第三方认证"两层语义合并，并与定位句一一对应，与预判吻合。

• D)无中生有

  It sold cleaning products that were not included in the official "Greenlist" 编造"卖了不在官方 Greenlist 里的清洁产品"，原文从未提及。原文 Greenlist 也并非"官方"清单，而是公司自有。

How did Christopher Beard defend his company's labeling practice? 问的是"用何种说法辩护"，答案在原话里。

How 作方式状语，主干 did Christopher Beard defend his company's labeling practice。注意 his company's labeling practice 是"公司的标签做法"——即 Greenlist 的标注行为；考生若误读为"产品"会偏。

• A)✓ 正确
  • this has been an area that is difficult to navigate↔There were no clear guidelines concerning green labeling

  A 项把"难以把握"具象化为"没有明确指引"，正是 Beard 用以为公司开脱的核心辩护点。

• B)答非所问

  His company's products had been well received by the public 谈"产品受欢迎"，原文未提及；Beard 提的是"自豪于 Greenlist 体系下的成就"，并非"公众反响好"。

• C)无中生有

  It was in conformity to the prevailing practice in the market 说"符合行业普遍做法"，原文中 Beard 从未做过"大家都这么干"的辩解。

• D)无中生有

  No law required the involvement of a third party in certification 称"法律没要求第三方介入"，原文未提任何法律层面的辩护。

What does Kevin Wilhelm imply by saying "It's kind of a Wild West" 问比喻句的言下之意，属句意题。

What 作 imply 的宾语，by saying "…" 作方式状语；引语 It's kind of a Wild West 是名词性比喻——Wild West（蛮荒西部）象征"无序、无规、各自为政"。考生需识别比喻义而非字面义。

• A)偷换概念

  Businesses compete to produce green products 谈的是"竞相生产"，原文谈的是"自称环保"——重点是宣传/贴标，不是生产。

• B)✓ 正确
  • anybody can claim themselves to be green↔Each business acts its own way in green labeling
  • Wild West↔Each business acts its own way

  B 项精准抓住"野西部=无统一规则、各自为政"的核心意涵，且与引语后半句的同位解释完全吻合。

• C)偷换概念

  Consumers grow wild with products labeled green 把"野西部"的 wild 字面附着到 consumers 头上，谈"消费者疯狂"，与原文谈"行业无序"完全两码事。

• D)偷换概念

  Anything produced in the West can be labeled green 把 Wild West 误解为字面地理意义上的"西部"，并嫁接到"产地→可贴绿标"的奇怪结论上。