2016年6月·第2套 英语六级听力真题原文与答案解析

What seems to have been very successful according to the woman speaker?

题干原话回指首句话题。女方先点出话题 you managed the innovation project at Cucin Tech，随后说 It seems to have been very successful，题干的 successful 正是直接回指这个"innovation project"，定位句就在开头。

• the innovation project at Cucin Tech↔The project the man managed at Cucin Tech近乎原句对应

• B)原词陷阱The updating of technology at Cucin Tech 借了公司名 Cucin Tech 和 technology 一词诱你"听到就选"，但录音说成功的是 innovation project，不是"技术更新"，且后文 new products being created simply because the technology is there 反而是被否定的做法。

  借用原文：the innovation project at Cucin Tech

• C)未提及The man's switch to a new career 在录音里找不到对应，男方只谈他在 Cucin Tech 做的项目，从未提换职业；这是凭"the man"这个共同主语硬凑的干扰。
• D)张冠李戴The restructuring of her company 把对象换成女方的公司(her)，并加了录音没提的 restructuring(重组)；成功的是男方负责的项目，主语张冠李戴。

What did the company lack before the man's scheme was implemented?

被问者对"是不是靠创新"的应答。女方问 Was the revival...entirely due to strategic innovation?，男方答 Yes, yes. I think it was，确认"扭转靠的正是策略性创新"——反推改变前公司缺的就是 strategic innovation；信号是被问者的肯定应答。

• strategic innovation↔Strategic innovation确认即原词对应

• A)原词陷阱Talented personnel 利用录音 I could see there was a lot of talent there 里的 talent 诱选，但男方说公司"本来就有不少人才"，恰恰是"有"而非"缺"，极性正好相反。

  借用原文：there was a lot of talent there

• C)原词陷阱Competitive products 借了 particularly in their product development 里的 product 诱选，但录音说的是公司在产品开发上"有潜力"，并非缺有竞争力的产品。

  借用原文：some great potential, particularly in their product development

• D)未提及Effective promotion 在录音里没有任何对应，男方通篇谈创新与人才潜力，未提"推广/营销"，属凭常识硬补。

What does the man say he should do in his business?

we need to 表主张。We need to be innovating constantly to keep up with this 用 we need to 直接表态"必须不断创新"，再加 Stand still, and you're lost 强化，这就是男方主张该做的事。

• We need to be innovating constantly↔Innovate constantly动词形式微调

• A)未提及Expand the market 录音从未提及，男方谈的是创新而非市场扩张，属凭商业常识补的干扰。
• B)原词陷阱Recruit more talents 借了前文 a lot of talent there 的 talent 一词诱选，但男方谈的是"用好现有人才(harness that)"，并未主张"再招更多人"。

  借用原文：I could see there was a lot of talent there

• D)原词陷阱Watch out for his competitors 借了后文 difficult for a competitor to copy 的 competitor 诱选，但男方主张的是"不断创新"，没说"提防对手"；competitor 出现在讲风险的另一处。

  借用原文：difficult for a competitor to copy

What does the man say is the risk of innovation?

The risk is 直接点风险。The risk is of course that innovation may frequently lead to imitation 用 The risk is 明确点出风险，紧跟其后的 imitation 就是答案，信号词就是 risk 本身。

• innovation may frequently lead to imitation↔Imitation by one's competitorsimitation 同词+补出施动者

• A)未提及Possible bankruptcy 录音从未提及，是凭"风险=最坏结果"的常识硬推，男方只点了 imitation 一种风险。
• B)未提及Unforeseen difficulties 太笼统，录音点的是具体的 imitation，没说"意外难题"，属无中生有。
• C)原词陷阱Conflicts within the company 借了通篇出现的 company 诱选，但录音从没提"公司内部冲突"，风险明确是外部的 imitation。

  借用原文：at all levels of the company

What are the speakers mainly talking about?

开场介绍嘉宾身份即点题。主持人开场就用 who has worked for the last 20 years as an interpreter 点出嘉宾是口译员，随后全程围绕口译展开，这种"开头介绍身份+话题"的句子是访谈类对话的主旨信号。

• who has worked for the last 20 years as an interpreter↔The job of an interpreter.身份引出职业话题

• B)答非所问原文确实谈到 puts your short-term memory under intense stress 的压力，但那只是聊口译时的一个分支，The stress felt by professionals. 把局部当主旨，以偏概全。

  借用原文：puts your short-term memory under intense stress

• C)答非所问原文借男士之口提到"会多种语言不等于能做口译"，反衬口译之专业，并未把"语言能力的重要性"当主题；The importance of language proficiency. 抓了个一闪而过的点冒充主旨。

  借用原文：many people think anyone who speaks more than one language can do it

• D)未提及对话谈的是口译这一职业本身，从头到尾没有讨论"怎样有效沟通"，The best way to effective communication. 在原文找不到落点，属无中生有。

What does the man think of Dana's profession?

直白的评价用词 admiration。男士直接说 I'm full of admiration for what you do，admiration 是明确的褒义评价词，态度题就抓这种第一人称、带感情色彩的直陈句。

• I'm full of admiration for what you do↔Admirable.名词 admiration 转形容词 admirable

• A)未提及Promising.（有前途的）在男士的评价里没有依据，男士谈的是钦佩与这行被低估，未涉及前景，属无中生有。
• C)未提及Rewarding.（有回报的）原文男士并未提及，他强调的是"钦佩"与"职业被低估"，并没有说这份工作回报丰厚。
• D)未提及Meaningful.（有意义的）同样在原文找不到对应，男士的评价词是 admiration，不是"有意义"，属于近义褒义词凑数。

What does Dana say about the interpreters she knows?

双重否定即全称肯定。There aren't any interpreters I know who don't have professional qualifications 是"没有...不..."的双重否定，等于"我认识的口译员都有专业资格"，这种 no...without 结构是细节题常埋的全称信号。

• There aren't any interpreters I know who don't have professional qualifications and training↔They all have professional qualifications.双重否定改写为 all have

• A)未提及They all have a strong interest in language.（都对语言有浓厚兴趣）原文 Dana 没说，她强调的是 professional qualifications and training，不是兴趣，属无中生有。
• C)偷换概念They have all passed language proficiency tests. 借用了第 5 题选项里 language proficiency 的字眼制造熟悉感，但原文说的是 professional qualifications and training（专业资格与培训），不是"通过语言能力测试"，把"专业资格"偷换成"语言测试"。

  借用原文：professional qualifications and training

• D)未提及They have all studied cross-cultural differences.（都研究过跨文化差异）原文完全没有出现，是凭"口译涉及文化"的联想编造，属无中生有。

What do most interpreters think of consecutive interpreting?

actually no 转折后才是真意。男士先猜 simultaneous 更难，Dana 用 Well, actually no 转折否定，紧接 Most people in the business would agree that consecutive interpreting is the more stressful 才是结论；态度被纠正后的那句、配上 more stressful 比较结构，正是答案句。

• consecutive interpreting is the more stressful↔It is more stressful than simultaneous interpreting.比较对象补全

• A)张冠李戴It requires a much larger vocabulary. 中"词汇"易让人联想原文 prepare technical expressions，但那段讲的是 simultaneous 的事前准备，且原文并未说交替传译"需要更大词汇量"，属无中生有兼张冠李戴。

  借用原文：prepare technical expressions

• B)原词陷阱It attaches more importance to accuracy. 蹭了原文 never translated word for word 给人的"准确"印象，但原文恰恰说交替传译"不逐字译、要概括"，谈的是处理方式而非"更重准确度"，方向被改。

  借用原文：never translated word for word

• D)原词陷阱It puts one's long-term memory under more stress. 盗用了原文 puts your short-term memory under intense stress 里的 memory，但原文压的是 short-term memory（短时记忆），选项偷改成 long-term memory（长时记忆），一字之差正好相反。

  借用原文：puts your short-term memory under intense stress

What is the long-held view about mothers' sleeping with newborn babies?

for years 对应题干 long-held。句首 Mothers have been warned for years 里的 for years（多年来）正对题干的 long-held（长期持有的看法），这种『时间持续』信号标出了那条由来已久的旧观点，是答案句的定位标记。

• increases the risk that the baby might die unexpectedly during the night↔It might increase the risk of infants' death.the baby might die = infants' death 名词化等值

• A)张冠李戴It might affect mothers' health. 借用了通篇高频词 mothers 来诱选，但本题问的旧观点针对的是婴儿死亡风险，『影响妈妈健康』是后文以色列研究的新发现、不是 long-held view，受害对象张冠李戴。

  借用原文：negative consequences, not for the child, but for the mother

• B)原词陷阱It might disturb infants' sleep. 套用了原文 sleep 这一核心词，但原文恰恰说婴儿睡眠没变差（Infants...didn't appear to have worse sleep），且旧观点讲的是死亡风险而非扰乱婴儿睡眠，答非所问且与原文相反。

  借用原文：Infants, on the other hand, didn't appear to have worse sleep

• D)未提及It might increase mothers' mental distress. 同样借 mothers 诱选，但原文从未说同睡增加母亲的『心理压力』，只说母亲睡眠变差；mental distress 属无中生有，且对象与旧观点不符。

What do Israeli researchers' findings show?

But now 转折后才是新发现。句首 But now 是强转折信号，前半句的旧观点（害婴儿）被推翻，转折之后 negative consequences, not for the child, but for the mother 才是以色列研究的真正发现，转折后才是落点。

• negative consequences, not for the child, but for the mother↔Sleeping with infants in the same room has a negative impact on mothers.negative consequences for the mother = negative impact on mothers
• even sleeping in the same room↔Sleeping with infants in the same roomsame room 两端原义保留

• A)原词陷阱Mothers who breast-feed their babies have a harder time falling asleep. 套用原文出现过的 breast-feeding 一词，但原文说的是把哺乳因素排除后结论仍成立（even taking into account that many of the women...were breast-feeding），从未说哺乳的妈妈更难入睡，属答非所问。

  借用原文：even taking into account that many of the women in the study were breast-feeding their babies

• B)与原文相反Mothers who sleep with their babies need a little more sleep each night. 盗用 sleep、each night 等词，但原文说同房母亲睡得更差、睡眠时间更短（were awake approximately 20 minutes longer per night），不是『需要更多睡眠』，方向与原文相反。

  借用原文：had poorer sleep than mothers whose baby slept elsewhere

• C)张冠李戴Sleeping patterns of mothers greatly affect their newborn babies' health. 盗用 mothers、newborn 等词，但研究恰恰发现婴儿睡眠未受影响、受害的是母亲，把影响对象反向安到婴儿健康上，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：not for the child, but for the mother

What does the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend mothers do?

recommends 建议信号直接领出对策。句中 the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends 与题干 recommend 同根对应，建议词后接的 not sleep in the same bed...but sleep in the same room 就是要找的具体做法，建议信号是定位灵魂。

• not sleep in the same bed as their babies, but sleep in the same room↔Sleep in the same room but not in the same bed as their babies.not bed but room = same room but not same bed 仅语序对调

• A)原词陷阱Change their sleep patterns to adapt to their newborn babies'. 套用了原文末尾出现的 sleep patterns 一词，但那是说『父亲的睡眠模式可能也是干扰源』（their sleep patterns could also be causing the sleep disruptions），并非建议母亲去改作息迁就婴儿，答非所问。

  借用原文：their sleep patterns could also be causing the sleep disruptions for mums

• C)与原文相反Sleep in the same house but not in the same room as their babies. 与正确项只差几个空间词，盗用了 same room 的句式却把建议改成『同屋不同房』，恰与原文 sleep in the same room（要同房）相反，是相近选项里的空间词偷换。

  借用原文：but sleep in the same room

• D)原词陷阱Take precautions to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. 把原文原样出现的 reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome 整条搬来诱选，但那是建议的『目的/原因』，不是建议母亲做的『具体动作』；题干问 do what，该项只是笼统说采取预防、答非所问。

  借用原文：to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome

What do we learn from the report?

开头既成事实句。录音第一句就用 has already lost more than a third 直陈既成事实，already 加完成态是定位答案句的信号——篇章独白常在开头点出核心事实，这一句正是承载本题答案的事实句。

• has already lost more than a third of the native languages↔A lot of native languages have already died out in the US已失去等于已消亡

• B)原词陷阱选项 The US ranks first in the number of endangered languages. 盗用录音里 the remaining 192 这个数字制造熟悉感，但录音只说剩 192 种被划为濒危，从未说美国濒危语言数量排名第一，ranks first 是凭空捏造的排名。

  借用原文：the remaining 192 are classed by UNESCO

• C)与原文相反选项 The efforts to preserve Indian languages have proved fruitless. 与录音相反：录音借发言人说 We are making progress（我们正在取得进展），明确肯定保护工作有成效，C 却说努力毫无成效，极性正好反了。

  借用原文：We are making progress

• D)答非所问选项 More money is needed to record the native languages in the US. 借用录音 money needs to be spent 制造熟悉感，但录音强调钱要花在复兴而非记录上，且这句是发言人呼吁经费的目的（对应第 13 题），并非本题问的从报道中得知的总体事实，答非所问。

  借用原文：money needs to be spent on revitalizing languages, not just documenting them

For what purpose does Fred Nawusky appeal for more funding?

转折 but 加对比。答案藏在转折 but 之后，且用 not just documenting them 把记录与复兴对比，强调钱要花在复兴上——转折后加 not just A but B 的对比，正是锁定真正目的的信号。

• money needs to be spent on revitalizing languages↔To revitalise America's native languages动词同义直对

• A)答非所问选项 To set up more language schools. 借用第二段 emerging schools（新兴学校）制造关联，但学校是后文谈语言传承时提到的，并非发言人呼吁经费的目的，且原文没说要用钱多建学校，答非所问。

  借用原文：progress is being made through emerging schools

• B)与原文相反选项 To document endangered languages. 盗用录音 documenting them 这个原词，但录音用 not just 把记录明确排除为应优先的目的，钱不该只花在记录上，选 B 等于选了被否定的那一半。

  借用原文：not just documenting them

• C)张冠李戴选项 To educate native American children. 借第二段 if you teach children when they are young 制造熟悉感，但教孩子是发言人谈语言如何延续时说的，不是他呼吁经费的目的，张冠李戴到了经费用途上。

  借用原文：if you teach children when they are young

What is the historical cause of the decline in American Indian Languages?

has its historical roots。录音用 has its historical roots 显式引出历史根源，紧接着的 the US government adopted a policy of Americanizing Indian children 就是原因句——roots 这一因果信号词后面跟的内容即答案所在。

• the US government adopted a policy of Americanizing Indian children↔The US government's policy of Americanising Indian children.近乎原句对应

• B)未提及选项 The failure of American Indian languages to gain an official status. 说语言未获官方地位，录音通篇未提官方地位一事，属凭空添加。
• C)原词陷阱选项 The US government's unwillingness to spend money educating Indians. 盗用录音前文 money needs to be spent 的花钱话题制造熟悉感，但录音说的是政府主动同化、带走儿童，从未说政府不愿花钱教育印第安人，且这与历史原因无关。

  借用原文：money needs to be spent on revitalizing languages

• D)与原文相反选项 The long-time isolation of American Indians from the outside world. 与录音方向相反：录音说政府把儿童从家庭文化中带走、强行同化（让他们融入而非隔绝），D 却说长期与外界隔绝，正好反了。

  借用原文：removing them from their homes and culture

What does the speaker say about television?

challenge 加 accelerating。录音先用 Another challenge to language survival is television 给电视定了负面基调，再以 accelerating the extinction 点出后果——challenge 与 accelerating 这两个负面词共同标定答案句。

• accelerating the extinction of native languages↔It speeds up the extinction of native languages.加速同义改写

• A)与原文相反选项 It is being utilised to teach native languages. 把电视说成教语言的正面工具，与录音相反：录音说电视把英语带进家庭、加速本土语言灭绝，是负面角色，并未说用它来教本土语言。

  借用原文：Another challenge to language survival is television

• B)原词陷阱选项 It tells traditional stories during family time. 盗用录音 traditional storytelling and family time 的原词，但录音说电视挤掉了传统讲故事和家人相处时间，B 却说电视在讲传统故事，把被挤掉的对象说成电视的行为，意思反了。

  借用原文：pushed out traditional storytelling and family time together

• D)张冠李戴选项 It is widely used in language immersion schools. 把第二段谈语言学校（emerging schools）的内容安到电视头上，录音从未说电视广泛用于沉浸式语言学校，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：Such schools have become a model in Hawaii

How does unemployment insurance help the unemployed?

紧跟制度名后的“It pays…”界定句。答案句是制度被点名后立刻给出的定义句 It pays laid-off workers up to half of their previous wages while they look for work.，以 It pays… 直接说明它发什么、发多少，这种“主语+pays+具体内容”的界定句就是细节题的落点。

• It pays laid-off workers up to half of their previous wages↔It pays them up to half of their previous wageslaid-off workers 概括为代词 them，其余近乎原义
• while they look for work↔while they look for work限定条件原义对应

• B)原词陷阱It covers their mortgage payments and medical expenses for 99 weeks. 里 mortgage payments、medical（药）确在录音别处出现，但那是 Rosen 个人的开销与困境，并非失业保险的界定内容；99 weeks 与“支付一半工资”更是无关，属把分散原词拼成假信息。

  借用原文：He's cut back on medications and he no longer helps support his disabled mother.

• C)偷换概念It pays their living expenses until they find employment again. 方向对，但录音明确是 up to half of their previous wages（最高一半工资），并非覆盖全部生活开销；C 抹掉了关键限额“一半”，把精确条件偷换成笼统说法。

  借用原文：up to half of their previous wages

• D)未提及It provides them with the basic necessities of everyday life. 听上去合情合理，但录音从未说失业保险提供“基本生活必需品”，它发的是按比例的现金（一半工资），D 属凭常识脑补、原文未提。

What is local director Elizabeth Walsh of the Bucks County Careerlink doing?

人名 + says + 其动作的应答式落点。答案句以人名直接领出 Elizabeth Walsh says they provide training and guidance，人名后紧跟的“says + 做什么”就是该人物对应的答案信号，谁说的归谁。

• they provide training and guidance↔Providing training and guidance动词 provide 转动名词 Providing，核心词原词保留
• help unemployed workers find local job opportunities↔for unemployed workers服务对象原义对应

• A)原词陷阱Creating jobs for the huge army of unemployed workers. 用了原文反复出现的 jobs、unemployed workers，听上去顺耳；但 Walsh 做的是提供培训与指导、撮合岗位与求职者，“创造岗位”是后文 Scott Petri 的投资主张才能带来的，非她所为。

  借用原文：provide training and guidance to help unemployed workers find local job opportunities

• C)张冠李戴Convincing local lawmakers to extend unemployment benefits. 中 extend unemployment benefits 确在录音出现，但那是 Rosen 创立的 Ninety-Niners Union 的目标，不是 Walsh 在做的事，属把别人的事安到本题人物身上。

  借用原文：Their goal is to convince lawmakers to extend unemployment benefits.

• D)未提及Raising funds to help those having no unemployment insurance. 看似也是救助失业者，但录音里 Walsh 没有筹款之举，“为无保险者筹款”全篇未出现，属凭印象脑补。

What does Pennsylvania state representative Scott Petri say is the best way to help the long-term unemployed?

the best way … is to … 主张落点句。答案句以 He thinks the best way to help the long-term unemployed is to allow private citizens to invest in local companies that can create more jobs. 给出明确主张，the best way…is to… 这种带评价的句式正是“某人认为最佳办法”的答案信号。

• allow private citizens to invest in local companies↔encouraging private investments in local companies动词 invest 名词化为 investments，allow≈encouraging
• that can create more jobs↔To create more jobs目的从句转不定式，原义对应

• A)未提及To offer them loans they need to start their own businesses. 中创业贷款听似帮扶失业者，但 Petri 主张的是吸引私人投资本地公司，从未提及给个人贷款创业，属凭常识脑补。
• B)原词陷阱To allow them to postpone their monthly mortgage payments. 里 monthly mortgage payments 确在录音末尾出现，但那是讲 Rosen 仍要还房贷的处境，不是 Petri 提出的办法；“缓交房贷”是 Petri 的主张里没有的。

  借用原文：time that Rosen says still requires him to buy food and make monthly mortgage payments

• D)与原文相反To encourage big businesses to hire back workers with government subsidies. 也讲创造就业，但 Petri 明确说政府没钱（governments simply do not have enough money），主张靠私人投资而非政府补贴；D 把资金来源反过来，与原文相左。

  借用原文：governments simply do not have enough money to extend unemployment insurance

What did Pen Hadow and his team do in the Arctic Ocean?

人名出现处即答案区。录音开篇就点名 British explorer Pen Hadow and his team，和题干问的是同一拨人；紧跟其后的 taking measurements and recording observations about the ice 正是他们的动作。人名一出现、其后紧跟的动作就是答案句。

• taking measurements and recording observations about the ice↔investigated the ice测量记录冰=研究冰（概括）

• A)原词陷阱录音确有 taking measurements（测量）一词，A 的 measured 听上去就是它；但录音测的是“冰”，A 却说测 the depths of sea water（海水深度）。盗了 measure 这个原词，却把测量对象换成了海水深度，属答非所问。

  借用原文：taking measurements and recording observations about the ice

• B)未提及录音通篇没提分析海水成分这回事，analyzed the water content 是看到“海洋”就联想的科研常见动作。属录音未提及的内容。
• C)答非所问C 说 explored the ocean floor（探索海底），但录音里这队人研究的是 the ice（冰），不是海床。explore 是常见科考动词，听感顺，但研究对象与录音相反方向、对不上。

What does the report say about the Arctic region?

转折 But 之后才是真意。本句以 But 起头，前半句 Satellite observations and submarine service over the past few years have shown less ice 是铺垫，转折 But 之后的 the loss is more pronounced than previously thought 才是报道真正强调的结论。转折词后即答案落点。

• the loss is more pronounced than previously thought↔The ice decrease is more evident than previously thoughtpronounced=evident、loss=decrease 同义替换

• A)原词陷阱录音第 4 段确有 roughly 80 percent loss of ice cover on the Arctic Ocean in ten years，A 的 Eighty percent 就是它；但录音说的是“十年内损失八成”，A 却说成“夏天消失八成”（disappears in summertime）。盗了 80% 这个数字，时间范围却被偷换。

  借用原文：roughly 80 percent loss of ice cover on the Arctic Ocean in ten years

• B)未提及录音通篇只讲冰在快速消失，从未说冰是“过去几个世纪累积”而来。B 是凭“厚冰应该是长年攒出来的”常识脑补，录音无对应。
• C)未提及C 把话题引到 endangered species（濒危物种的存活），但录音从头到尾没谈冰对物种的保护作用，整条是录音之外的延伸。

What does Cambridge scientist Peter Wadhams say in his study?

姓名 + says 直接引出观点。录音用 Cambridge scientist Peter Wadhams… says 直接点名并引出他的判断 the decline is irreversible。题干问的就是这个人 say 什么，姓名加 says 之后的内容即答案句。

• the decline is irreversible↔The decline of Arctic ice is irreversible近乎原句、仅补出 decline 指向

• A)未提及录音没说北极冰是世界淡水的主要来源。a major source of… fresh water 是凭“冰=淡水”常识的推想，录音无对应。
• B)过度推断录音只讲冰在加速消失（第 6 段讲恶性循环），从未说已经 drowned many coastal cities（淹了很多沿海城市）。这是“冰化→海平面升→淹城”的常识链条脑补，录音没说已发生。
• D)张冠李戴“对人类至关重要”这层意思更接近第 8 段 Summercorn 说的 The Arctic sea ice holds a central position in the earth's climate system，而题干问的是 Wadhams 在他研究里说的。把别人对气候系统的话安到 Wadhams 头上，属张冠李戴。

  借用原文：The Arctic sea ice holds a central position in the earth's climate system

How does Peter Wadhams view climate change?

姓名 + says 引出表态。结尾段 Wadhams says there is no easy technological fix to climate change，再次以姓名 + says 引出他对气候变化的看法。题干问 Wadhams 的观点，这句即答案。

• no easy technological fix to climate change↔There is no easy technological solution to itfix=solution 同义、it 指代 climate change

• A)未提及“气候变化对人类有大害”虽符合常识，但录音里 Wadhams 这段说的是“没有简单技术办法”，并未对气候变化下“有大害”这个判断。属凭常识脑补、录音未明说。
• B)原词陷阱B 与正确项 D 都以 no easy 开头，录音确有 no easy technological fix；但 B 后接 way to understand it（难以理解），录音说的是难以“技术解决”，不是难“理解”。盗了 no easy 的句式，把 fix 偷换成 understand。

  借用原文：there is no easy technological fix to climate change

• C)原词陷阱录音末句确实念到 embracing nuclear power（拥抱核能），C 的 nuclear technology 就是勾这个词；但录音是把核能列为“替代化石燃料的选项之一”，绝非说“气候变化会推进核技术”。盗了 nuclear 原词，硬安了一个不存在的因果。

  借用原文：embracing nuclear power

What is the new study about?

开头点题句 a new study...has tracked how，直接交代研究干什么。篇章独白的主旨多在开头点出。这里 a new study that began with about 1,000 children in New Zealand has tracked how a child's low self-control can predict poor health, money troubles and even a criminal record in their adult years 用 has tracked how 明说研究在追踪"自控力如何预测成年后果"，正是全篇主题句。

• how a child's low self-control can predict poor health, money troubles and even a criminal record in their adult years↔The relation between children's self-control and their future success."自控力预测成年后果"被概括成"自控力与未来的关系"

• C)原词陷阱录音确实念到 had the most health problems 和单亲（raising a child as a single parent），C 把这两个原词拼成 The health problems of children raised by a single parent.，但这只是研究中的一个结果片段，不是研究主题；用真实出现过的词诱你"听到就选"。

  借用原文：health problems in their thirties

• D)未提及The deciding factor in children's academic performance. 把话题缩到"学业表现的决定性因素"，但全篇讲的是健康、经济、犯罪等成年结果，根本没说自控力是学业的"决定性因素"，既偷换了话题面又把程度说满。
• A)原词陷阱The reason why New Zealand children seem to have better self-control. 借了原文的 New Zealand、self-control 原词，但录音从没说"新西兰孩子自控更好"，更没解释其原因；研究只是恰好在新西兰做，A 是把地名细节硬编成一个不存在的主题。

  借用原文：about 1,000 children in New Zealand

What does the study seem to show?

结论信号 So it looks as though，研究者收束式的总判断。So it looks as though self-control is something that in one generation can disadvantage the next generation 由 So it looks as though 引出，是研究者对前文一连串现象的总结性判断，这种"所以看来……"句正是研究"显示出"的核心结论。

• self-control is something that in one generation can disadvantage the next generation↔Lack of self-control in parents is a disadvantage for their children."上一代殃及下一代"换成"父母缺自控不利于孩子"

• B)原词陷阱录音里 more likely to have a criminal record 和单亲都出现过，B 借这两个词拼成 Those with a criminal record mostly come from single parent families.，但原文说的是"低自控者更可能有犯罪记录"，方向是"自控差→可能犯罪"，B 反过来说"有犯罪记录的大多来自单亲"，既倒置因果又用 mostly 夸大。

  借用原文：more likely to have a criminal record

• A)张冠李戴Children raised by single parents will have a hard time in their thirties. 借了 in their thirties 和单亲两个原词，但录音说的是"低自控的孩子三十多岁时问题最多"，主语是低自控者、不是"单亲养大的孩子"，A 张冠李戴换了主体。

  借用原文：had the most health problems in their thirties

• C)未提及Parents must learn to exercise self-control in front of their children. 借了 self-control、parents、children 原词，但研究只是"显示"自控会跨代影响，从没说父母"必须当着孩子练自控"这种 must 式的行为要求，属凭空添加的建议。

What does Moffitt say is the good news from their study?

转折 + 原词信号 But the good news is，直接对上题干 good news。But the good news is that Moffitt says self-control can be taught by parents, and through school curricula 既有转折词 But，又把题干的 the good news is 原样念出，双重信号锁定这句就是答案句。

• self-control can be taught by parents, and through school curricula↔Self-control can be improved through education."可被父母教、靠学校课程"概括成"可经教育改善"

• B)原词陷阱financial 在录音里反复出现（improved their financial situation），B 用 Self-control can improve one's financial situation. 勾你"听到 financial 就选"。但题目问的是 good news，录音 good news 那句讲的是"能被教育培养"，没说"改善经济"是好消息；财务改善是别处的内容，答非所问。

  借用原文：improved their financial situation

• D)与原文相反Self-control problems will diminish as one grows up. 借了 self-control 原词，但好消息句的意思是要靠 taught by parents, and through school curricula 后天培养，恰恰说明它不会自动变好；D 的"随长大自然减弱"与原文方向相反。

  借用原文：self-control can be taught by parents

• C)答非所问Self-control problems may be detected early in children. 看似呼应录音里"从很小年龄就观察自控"（From a very early age），但题目问的是 good news，good news 那句讲的是"能被教育培养"，不是"能早发现"；C 把别处细节移花接木到本题。

  借用原文：From a very early age, some children exhibit better self-control than others