2020年9月·第1套 英语六级阅读理解（四选一） 第 2 篇 · 51–55 题答案与解析

What do we learn from the passage about the Coral Sea? 是开放式细节询问，没有 infer/imply/mainly about，落点是 "about the Coral Sea" 的客观介绍。

What do we learn from the passage about the Coral Sea? 主干 "What do we learn"，介词短语 "from the passage" 与 "about the Coral Sea" 都是状语，落点是对 the Coral Sea 的客观信息，无陷阱。

• A)✓ 正确
  • vast numbers of exotic fish↔exceptionally rich in marine life
  • a unique haven of biodiversity↔rich in marine life

  预判落点是"生物种类极丰富"，exceptionally rich in marine life 是这条预判的直接同义表述，锁 A。

• B)偷换概念

  原文 If a proposal by the Australian government goes ahead, the region will also become the world's largest marine protected area 用条件句 "if…will"，是"如果方案落地、将来成为"，而 It is the biggest marine protected area 用一般现在时把它说成既成事实。

• C)无中生有

  原文只说 Coral Sea 物种丰富、政府拟设保护区，并未提及 "largely undisturbed by humans"（基本未受人类干扰）——文中反而暗示需要 restrictions or bans on fishing, mining and marine farming，存在人类活动威胁。

• D)偷换概念

  原文用 rare sharks（稀有的）和 exotic fish（奇异的），强调稀有与多样；endangered species（濒危物种）比 rare/exotic 多了一层 "濒临灭绝" 的语义，超出原文程度。

What does the Australian government plan to do according to Tony Burke? 问的是具体计划内容，是对原文事实的复述，没有 infer/imply。

What does the Australian government plan to do according to Tony Burke? 主语 "the Australian government"，谓语 "plan to do"，"according to Tony Burke" 是介词短语状语，提示信息来源，无陷阱。

• A)答非所问

  题干问 "plan to do"（接下来要做什么），Tony Burke 公布的就是"做这个新提案" 本身；Make a new proposal to protect the Coral Sea 把答案锁死在 "再做一个新方案保护珊瑚海"，但原文重点是这次方案 would be the last——是收官，不是又起一个新提案的开端。

• B)强加因果

  Tony Burke 公布方案在 P2，scientists 的批评出现在 P3 之后；公布时方案尚未被批评，更谈不上 Revise its conservation plan owing to criticisms（因批评而修订）。

• C)偷换概念

  原文说本方案是"系列保护区的最后一个"——是新建，不是 Upgrade the established reserves（升级已建好的保护区）；动作对象从"完成新方案"被偷换为"升级既有方案"。

• D)✓ 正确
  • the last in a series of proposed marine reserves around Australia's coast↔Complete the series of marine reserves around its coast
  • around Australia's coast↔around its coast

  预判落点是"作为最后一块完成系列"，Complete the series 正是这个含义的动词化表达，锁 D。

What is scientists' argument about the Coral Sea proposal? 问群体观点的具体内容，是原文已陈述的事实，按细节题处理。

What is scientists' argument about the Coral Sea proposal? 主干 "What is scientists' argument"，"about the Coral Sea proposal" 限定 argument 的对象，无陷阱。

• A)✓ 正确
  • the government hasn't gone far enough in protecting the Coral Sea↔The government has not done enough for marine protection

  预判落点是"力度不够"，has not done enough for marine protection 是这条预判的最直接同义表达，锁 A。

• B)偷换概念

  原文说 the government hasn't gone far enough in…other marine reserves in the coastal network——是"这些保护区做得都不够"；It will not improve the marine reserves along Australia's coast 改写成"本提案不会改善沿海保护区"，把对"力度不足"的整体批评窄化并取反成"本提案对其他保护区没用"。

• C)无中生有

  原文从未提到 The government has not consulted them in drawing up the proposal（政府起草方案时未咨询科学家）——批评内容是 "力度不够"，不是 "未被咨询"。

• D)张冠李戴

  It is not based on sufficient investigations into the ecological system 即"对生态系统的调查不足" 是 P7 中 173 位 marine scientists 对西南方案的批评 the proposals for the southwestern region had not been based on the "core science principles" of reserves，并非对 Coral Sea 方案的批评。

What does marine geologist Robin Beaman say about the Coral Sea plan? 问某人说了什么具体内容，按细节题处理。

What does marine geologist Robin Beaman say about the Coral Sea plan? 主语 "marine geologist Robin Beaman"，同位语 "marine geologist" 给出身份，谓语 "say about"，无陷阱。

• A)张冠李戴

  It can compare with the British government's effort in the Indian Ocean 把 Beaman 的话改写成 "可与英国在印度洋的努力相比"，但 P6 中 Beaman 整段从未提英国/印度洋；那处比较出现在 P4 Hugh Possingham 的论点里，且原意是说 Coral Sea 还不如英国做得彻底。

• B)答非所问

  It will result in the establishment of the world's largest marine reserve 复述的是 the world's largest marine protected area 这一事实，确实在原文出现过；但题干问 Beaman 说了什么，他根本没说这句话。

• C)无中生有

  Beaman 通篇未提渔业可持续，It will ensure the sustainability of the fishing industry around the coast 在原文整段找不到对应——反而上下文（P4P5）讨论的是 fishing 应被 ban 的话题。

• D)✓ 正确
  • government agencies and other organisations have put into…huge effort↔a tremendous joint effort
  • broadly protect the range of habitats↔to protect the range of marine habitats

  预判两点 D 选项全部覆盖：joint effort 对应多方合力，protect the range of marine habitats 对应广覆盖生境——锁 D。

What do critics think of the Coral Sea plan? 问群体对具体方案的看法，是原文已陈述的批评内容，按细节题处理。

What do critics think of the Coral Sea plan? 主语 "critics"，谓语 "think of"，宾语 "the Coral Sea plan"，无陷阱。

• A)过度推断

  It will do more harm than good to the environment 是"对环境弊大于利"的强论断；原文只说"力度用错地方"，并未说会对环境造成 harm——批评的是"低效"而非"有害"。

• B)无中生有

  原文整段未涉及方案对 Australia's fishing industry 的负面影响；commercial opportunities 在 P8 中是"远海商业机会少"的描述，不是对渔业整体的影响判断。

• C)✓ 正确
  • where there is little threat to the environment↔regions that actually require little protection
  • offers the greatest protection to the offshore areas↔It will protect regions

  预判落点和 protect regions that actually require little protection 含义重合：力度用错了地方——锁 C。

• D)偷换概念

  It will win little support from environmental organisations 是"得不到环保组织支持"；但原文 An alliance of campaigning conservation groups argues that more of the Coral Sea should receive this level of protection 表明环保组织主张"应保护更多"，态度是"嫌弃力度不够"，与"不支持"在因果上不对等——环保组织反而是支持加强保护的一方。