2020年7月·第1套 英语六级阅读理解（四选一） 第 1 篇 · 46–50 题答案与解析

What do we learn about followers of the positive stress movement 问的是关于该群体的客观信息，没有 infer/imply/mainly about 等推断或主旨信号。

题干是一般疑问式陈述句：主语 we、谓语 learn、介词短语 about followers of the positive stress movement 指明所问对象。结构平铺直叙，无陷阱。

• A)无中生有

  sensitive to different types of stress『对不同压力敏感』全文未提；原文只说他们对压力的看法不同，不是对压力本身敏感。

• B)✓ 正确
  • a very different view of stress↔a different view on stress from the popular one
  • members of the positive stress movement↔They

  B 选项就是 a very different view of stress 的标准转述，与预判完全吻合。

• C)偷换概念

  derive much pleasure from living a very hectic life『从极忙生活中获取快乐』偷换了原文 looking for an edge in a competitive world 的概念——是『谋求优势』，不是『以忙为乐』。

• D)与原文相反

  gain a competitive edge by enjoying good health『靠好身体获得竞争优势』因果倒置：原文是为求竞争优势而做极端做法，不是先有好身体再获优势。

What do followers of the positive stress movement usually do to put their ideas into practice 明确问『通常做什么』，是对动作的客观提取。

主句 What do followers...usually do，加目的状语 to put their ideas into practice。注意 usually 是程度词，提醒考生找的是『常态做法』而非个例。

• A)无中生有

  keep changing their living habits『不断改变生活习惯』全文未出现，原文讲的是采取固定的极端做法，不是频繁更换。

• B)张冠李戴

  network with influential figures『与影响力人物建立人脉』把原文 Inspired by influential figures『受其启发』偷换为『与其建立关系』，主体关系完全错位。

• C)答非所问

  seek jobs in tech industries『在科技行业找工作』错读了原文 consisting largely of tech industry workers——后者是描述该群体『大多由科技业从业者组成』的成员构成，不是他们的『做法』。

• D)✓ 正确
  • extreme temperatures, restrictive diets, punishing exercise routines and general discomfort↔extreme tactics
  • positive stress practitioners seek out↔They apply

  D 用 extreme tactics 一词把原文四个并列做法整体收口，正好对应预判中的『极端手段』。

What does Zachary Rapp say about his unconventional practices 问 Rapp 自己怎么说，是观点转述类细节题。

What does Zachary Rapp say about his unconventional practices：主语 Rapp、谓语 say、about 后是讨论对象。无陷阱。

• A)✓ 正确
  • make him feel less stress from work↔combat stress from work
  • these practices↔They

  A 把『让他感觉压力变小』这一结果改写为『帮助他对抗压力』这一动作，是六级细节题典型的『因果同义改写』。

• B)无中生有

  cut down living expenses『降低生活开销』全文从未涉及任何与花费相关的内容。

• C)偷换概念

  recover from injuries and illnesses『从伤病中恢复』把原文 taking ice baths to recover from sports『大学时洗冰浴以从运动中恢复』偷换为『从伤病中恢复』，且这是『大学时的起源』而非『现在做法的效果』。

• D)偷换概念

  get three companies enlisted all at once『让三家公司同时上市』把原文 trying to get his three companies off the ground『让三家公司起步』偷换成『让三家公司上市』；get off the ground 与 enlist 不是一回事。

What can be inferred from the passage about day-to-day stress 中 inferred 明确点出题型。

What can be inferred from the passage about day-to-day stress：主句 What can be inferred、状语 from the passage、about 后是话题对象。注意 can be inferred 是被动语态加情态动词，等于 we can infer。

• A)过度推断

  harmful to one's physical and mental health『对身心健康有害』全文未对 day-to-day stress 作如此强烈的负面判断；首段提到的 dangers of too much stress 也是说『过大压力』而非 day-to-day。

• B)与原文相反

  does not differ in essence from positive stress『与 positive stress 本质上无区别』恰恰与定位句 the difference between day-to-day stress...and positive stress 强调的『二者有区别』完全相反。

• C)无中生有

  something everybody has to live with『人人必须忍受』全文未对 day-to-day stress 是否普遍作出判断。

• D)✓ 正确
  • the latter involves pushing the body to extremes and forcing it to build up a tolerance↔does not help build up one's tolerance
  • the difference between day-to-day stress...and positive stress is that the latter↔It

  the latter 独占 build up a tolerance，按对比逻辑前者就缺失该特征——D 正好把这一反向推论说出来。

What do some medical professionals think of positive stress 问的是该群体的客观观点，可在文中找到对应转述句，不是全文态度题。

What do some medical professionals think of positive stress：注意 some 是范围词——只是『一些』医生，不代表全体，提示选项里不要选全称表述。

• A)无中生有

  Its true effect remains to be verified『真正效果有待验证』全文未提及医生对 positive stress 效果是否已被验证的判断。

• B)偷换概念

  Its side effect should not be ignored『不应忽视其副作用』把 might even be dangerous 偷换为 side effect（副作用）；危险不等于副作用，副作用是医学专门术语。

• C)✓ 正确
  • not for everyone↔varies considerably from person to person
  • it might even be dangerous for people who are unhealthy or older↔varies considerably

  原文一边否定『对所有人都适用』，一边指出特定群体可能有危险——这两点合起来就是『效果因人而异』，C 精准命中。

• D)张冠李戴

  Its practitioners should not take it as a form of therapy『实践者不应把它当作疗法』把 some even call it a form of therapy『有人甚至称其为一种疗法』错配到医生头上，且未在医生口中出现这种反对意见。