2023年6月·第2套 英语四级听力真题原文与答案解析

What do we learn from the police report?

新闻导语句即答案。答案句就是 Police have reported a man being bitten by a 4-foot snake when he lifted his toilet seat on Sunday morning. 这一句——新闻报道的第一句（导语）就是 Police have reported…，是"警方报告"信号的直接落点。新闻题里只要题干问"警方/官方/这则报道说什么"，几乎都落在导语句。

• a man being bitten by a 4-foot snake↔A man was bitten by a snake.非谓语转过去时·同义直接对应

• B)与原文相反录音第二段明确说 the man did not have to go to the hospital——这位男子**没有**去医院，只是在现场处理了手臂。选项 A man was taken to a hospital. 盗用了原文的 hospital 一词却把否定砍掉，反成肯定，是典型"听到 hospital 就想选"的陷阱。

  借用原文：the man did not have to go to the hospital

• C)原词陷阱选项 A man kept a 4-foot snake as a pet. 把录音第 1 段里的 a 4-foot snake 原词搬过来，看似耳熟。但录音第 3 段明确说 the snake didn't belong to the man，蛇并不是男子的，更谈不上 kept…as a pet。这是"听到原词就想选"的原词陷阱。

  借用原文：a 4-foot snake

• D)原词陷阱选项 A man fell off his toilet seat. 借用了录音 he lifted his toilet seat 中的 toilet seat 这块"熟面孔"，但把动作偷换成了 fell off（从马桶上摔下来）。录音说的是"他掀开马桶盖"，根本没说他摔倒。这又是一处原词陷阱叠加偷换概念。

  借用原文：he lifted his toilet seat

What does the report say was still unclear?

unclear + who 直接锁定。答案信号是 It was unclear who the owner was. 中的 unclear 一词——它与题干 still unclear 直接对应；unclear 后面跟的 who the owner was 就是"未明的内容"，几乎是把答案塞到题干同款词的旁边。

• It was unclear who the owner was.↔Who owned the snake.名词转动词·who 从句同义重写

• A)原词陷阱录音 The snake was eventually captured by the local animal handlers and taken to an animal hospital afterward. 已经明确告诉我们蛇被送去了 animal hospital；之后还补了一句若无主认领"可能送到当地动物园"，去向并非"unclear"。选项 Where the snake had been taken. 借用 taken 这一原词制造"哪里去了仍不清楚"的错觉，实际录音对去向已交代。

  借用原文：taken to an animal hospital afterward

• B)原词陷阱录音 It was being treated for an outer skin infection. 明确说蛇正在因外皮感染接受治疗，感染状况已确认而非未明。选项 Whether the snake was infected. 把 infection 一词盗作诱饵，骗"听到 infection 就想选"的考生。

  借用原文：It was being treated for an outer skin infection.

• C)原词陷阱录音 The snake was eventually captured by the local animal handlers 明确说蛇是被当地的"动物管理员"捕获的，捕获方式（由谁、怎么抓）已交代。选项 How the snake was captured. 直接挪用 captured 一词，把已说清的事伪装成 unclear，是经典原词陷阱。

  借用原文：The snake was eventually captured by the local animal handlers

What has Andrea Belcher been doing since last April?

开篇点题句 + 时间状语锁定。新闻开篇 Every week since last April 与题干 since last April 完全对应，时间状语就是答案信号；后半句 when she takes out her trash 直接揭示行为载体——倒垃圾，这是承载答案的那句话。

• doing something slightly unusual and amusing when she takes out her trash↔Taking her trash out in fancy dresses概括 + 后文具体细化
• get dressed up to take out the trash↔in fancy dressesget dressed up = 穿正装 = fancy dresses

• B)原词陷阱录音第2段提到 a movie star shared a photo of herself putting her trash bins out in a ball gown，ball gown（晚礼服）只是她穿的衣服样式，并不是说"她去参加舞会"。选项 B 把 ball 偷换成 ball parties，把"穿礼服倒垃圾"硬扭成"去舞会自娱"，是典型的原词陷阱。

  借用原文：a movie star shared a photo of herself putting her trash bins out in a ball gown

• C)张冠李戴录音第2段明确 a movie star shared a photo of herself putting her trash bins out in a ball gown——分享照片的人是那位明星，分享的内容是明星自己的照片。选项 C 把动作主语换成了 Andrea，把"她和明星分享照片"安到她头上，是张冠李戴。

  借用原文：a movie star shared a photo of herself putting her trash bins out in a ball gown

• D)张冠李戴录音第3段说 Her daughter filmed it，是女儿帮她拍视频；第4段说 sharing her exploits on social media，分享的是"她自己的事迹"。选项 D 却说"发布她女儿的照片"，把"女儿帮拍"偷换成"发布女儿的照片"，主客颠倒。

  借用原文：Her daughter filmed it

Why has Andrea Belcher kept up her videos?

结尾解释句直接对应题干。录音第5段开头 Explaining why she has kept up the videos 与题干 Why has Andrea Belcher kept up her videos? 是几乎逐字对应的解释信号；其后的 a little bit of fun and craziness that made people smile 就是她给出的真实原因，是承载答案的那句话。

• a little bit of fun and craziness that made people smile↔To amuse peoplemade people smile = amuse people
• fun and craziness↔amusefun ≈ amuse 的同根义

• A)未提及录音里完全没有出现 popular/famous 类的动机描述；她坚持的原因被明确说成 to have a little bit of fun and craziness that made people smile，与"让自己出名"无关。选项 A 是"花絮新闻最常见的诱选动机"——预读时已警惕。
• C)原词陷阱录音第3段有 Her daughter filmed it and the whole family laughed，daughter 真的被念到，但只是说女儿帮她拍、全家笑——这不是她坚持的目的。选项 C 把 daughter 偷过来，硬安成"为了讨女儿欢心"，是典型原词陷阱。

  借用原文：Her daughter filmed it and the whole family laughed

• D)未提及录音里既没有 record（记录）也没有 achievements（成就）类的表达；she had done 20 weeks 只是叙述事实，并非"为了记录成就"。选项 D 是凭"长期坚持"脑补出来的，与解释信号后给出的真实动机不符。

What can people do at Frank's restaurant?

导语句直接点题。开头连用两个设问 No money but still hungry? No problem!，紧接着用 Welcome to… 引出餐厅做法，这是新闻典型的导语式信号——把整则新闻的核心事实押在第一段第一句。听到设问+欢迎句出现，就要在心里把笔停在这一句。

• No money but still hungry? No problem!↔even if they have no money设问反问 = 让步条件
• Anyone who is hungry and wants something to eat can take one, no questions asked and hand it to the staff for some food↔Have a mealhand it to the staff for some food = Have a meal

• A)原词陷阱录音第三段确实提到每份饭 each costing about $10，但说的是每张小票背后对应的餐费，并非顾客只要付 $10 就能 Eat as much as they want；选项盗用 $10 这个原词，把它扭成自助式的随便吃，是典型的听到数字就想选式陷阱。

  借用原文：each costing about $10

• B)录音第二段说 a donor came in with $100 for each member of its staff，$100 是某位捐赠者发给员工的人均款项，根本不是 a $100 prize 抽奖奖金；选项盗用 $100 这个原词，再嫁接 prize 制造抽奖联想。

  借用原文：a donor came in with $100 for each member of its staff

• D)录音里 no questions asked 明确说取餐时不需要回答任何问题，而 Get a free meal after answering some questions 偏偏要求顾客 answering some questions 才能得到免费餐，与原文方向相反；选项盗用 questions 这个原词，却反转了它的语义。

  借用原文：no questions asked

What does the owner of the restaurant say about the idea for the board of free meals?

according to + owner 的转述信号。录音里 according to Tarah Morris, the owner of the restaurant 是典型的新闻转述信号，把整段缘起绑定到店主之口，正好对应题干 the owner…say about。听到 according to + 人物身份，就要在心里给整段打上本人原话的标签。

• The idea for the board of free meals started after a donor came in with $100 for each member of its staff↔originated from a donationstarted after = originated from
• $100 for each member of its staff↔to her stafffor each member of its staff = to her staff

• A)录音里 After two staffers returned to their share 说的是两名员工把分到的 $100 退了回来，他们的动作是 returned，而不是 brought up the idea；选项盗用 two staffers 这个原词，把退款人偷换为想法的提出者，是张冠李戴。

  借用原文：After two staffers returned to their share

• B)未提及店主谈的是 idea 怎么开始的，整段录音从未提及这块板让餐厅本身变得更出名或更受欢迎，popularize her restaurant 在原文中找不到对应信息，是用主题词撑起的无中生有项。
• D)录音里把 idea 的发起归到店主与员工的商量（they decided to do something more by creating the board），并未出现顾客建议的桥段；suggested by some of her customers 把提议人替换成 customers，与原文角色不符，是典型的张冠李戴。

  借用原文：they decided to do something more by creating the board

What has happened at Frank's restaurant since the board of free meals was created?

In fact 强调真正结论。录音用 In fact, there are a lot more people giving tickets than receiving，In fact 是新闻里典型的强调真正结论的信号词，把前文铺垫与轻描淡写一笔翻起来，落到本则新闻的核心收束。听到 In fact 就要在心里抢一拍：这后面是答案落点。

• there are a lot more people giving tickets than receiving↔More people have been giving than takingmore…than 结构原样保留
• giving tickets↔giving省略宾语而义不变

• A)录音里 just under 50 customers have picked up a free meal，50 这个数字指的是取走免费餐的顾客接近 50 人，而不是 Fifty customers have offered donations 提供捐款的人；选项盗用 50 这个原词数字，把动作从 picked up 偷换为 offered donations，是经典的数字原词陷阱。

  借用原文：just under 50 customers have picked up a free meal

• C)Many people have come to eat at the restaurant 只说很多人来吃饭，是泛化的常识陈述；录音真正强调的是 giving 与 taking 的对比，而不是来店人数。选项盗用 people、eat、restaurant 这类高频主题词，制造听起来都对的错觉。

  借用原文：just under 50 customers have picked up a free meal

• D)录音里 The board has messages of kindness like, "If you want more kindness in the world, put it here." 说的是这块板上写满了暖心留言，并不是 Most staffers have received messages of kindness 大多数员工收到了暖心留言；选项盗用 messages of kindness 这一原词短语，把接受方从板偷换成员工，是张冠李戴。

  借用原文：The board has messages of kindness

What do we learn about the man?

开场介绍嘉宾的固定句。信号词是 Our guest today is psychologist——「今天的嘉宾是…」是访谈节目报身份的标志句，紧跟其后的名词就是嘉宾职业。

• psychologist Steve Pinker↔He is a psychologist.同词直给——但听清职业

• B)未提及录音通篇没有提到男士是作家，He is a famous writer. 属于无中生有。
• C)原词陷阱录音里 Welcome to our program 中的 program 确实是「节目」原词，He is a host for a TV program. 故意用 program 引诱，但说「欢迎收看节目」的是女主持人 Jane，男士是「嘉宾」(guest)，不是主持人。

  借用原文：Welcome to our program, Friends and Relationships.

• D)未提及录音从头到尾未提及小学/教师/teach 等任何线索，He is a primary school teacher. 属于完全无中生有。

What are the speakers mainly talking about?

Our question today is… 是节目抛题信号。信号词是 Our question today is why friends suddenly disappear——访谈节目用 Our question today is…/Today we will talk about… 这种句式直接点出本期话题，后面的从句就是主旨。

• why friends suddenly disappear↔Why friends break off contact all of a sudden.同义改写——disappear ↔ break off contact，suddenly ↔ all of a sudden
• block us on their social media accounts and stop responding to our emails↔friends break off contact详述↔概括

• A)原词陷阱Why social media accounts vanish without a trace. 抠走了录音里的 social media accounts 和 vanish without a trace 两个原词，听到就想选；但录音说的是「朋友」会通过拉黑社交账号等方式消失，主体是「朋友」，不是「账号本身」——选项把「朋友消失」的一种具体表现错读成了主题，属以偏概全。

  借用原文：They may block us on their social media accounts

• B)录音确实在 The answer may lie in childhood, the way the person related to their mom and dad. 谈到了童年与父母关系，但那是嘉宾对「为什么朋友会突然消失」的解释；选项 Why parents raise their children in different ways. 把这个解释方向错抬成了主题，主题是「消失」不是「育儿方式」。

  借用原文：The answer may lie in childhood

• C)原词陷阱Why people fail to respond to emails promptly. 抠走了录音原词 stop responding to our emails，但「不回邮件」只是「朋友消失」的一种具体形态而已，把它当主题同样是以偏概全，且和 A 犯一样的错。

  借用原文：stop responding to our emails

How do children with an anxious attachment style react to a breakdown in their relationship with parents?

对照结构 anxious …. But other children …。信号词是 But other children——嘉宾用 But 把两类孩子的反应并排对照。这种对照句是出题铁矿，正确反应几乎都在 But 两侧之一。题干问的是 anxious 那一类，对应 But 前半部分。

• scream and cry to get their parents to come back↔They scream to get their parents back.选项几乎是原句裁剪

• A)原词陷阱They simply shut themselves down. 抠走了录音原词 simply shut down，听到 simply shut down 就想选；但录音明确说这是 But other children(另一类，即回避型)的反应，不是焦虑型的反应。

  借用原文：But other children simply shut down

• B)They avoid showing their emotions. 描述的是「回避情绪」，更接近回避型(But other children…try to deal with their emotions by ignoring)；焦虑型 scream and cry 反而是大力外露情绪，与本选项相反。

  借用原文：try to deal with their emotions by ignoring the situation

• D)原词陷阱They attempt to ignore the whole situation. 抠走的是录音原词 ignoring the situation，听到就想选；但这同样是 But other children 那一类(回避型)的反应，不是焦虑型的反应。

  借用原文：try to deal with their emotions by ignoring the situation

What does the man say about insecurely attached people?

However + To them 双重信号锁定结论。信号词一：However, an insecurely attached person won't——However 是转折信号，前面说安全型怎么处理，转折后才是题干所问的不安全型。信号词二：To them, a difference, no matter how small in your eyes, signals the end of the relationship.——To them 是对前面群体下定论的总结句，是嘉宾真正要传达给观众的「金句」，几乎必出题。

• To them, a difference, no matter how small in your eyes, signals the end of the relationship.↔They may regard any difference as the end of a relationship.同义改写——signals ↔ regard…as，no matter how small ↔ any

• B)They are on better terms with friends and romantic partners. 是正面描述「和朋友/恋人相处更好」，但录音里嘉宾对不安全型的描述是 They might either attack you, get defensive, or just disappear from your life.，是关系处理失败的方向，选项与录音方向完全相反。

  借用原文：They might either attack you, get defensive, or just disappear from your life.

• C)原词陷阱They try to express their feelings and thoughts effectively. 抠走的是录音原词 express their own feelings and thoughts effectively，听到 express…effectively 就想选；但这句话是嘉宾对 securely attached(安全型)人的描述，不是问的不安全型。

  借用原文：They're able to hear what the other person is saying and express their own feelings and thoughts effectively.

• D)They attach more value to their relationships with others. 说「他们更看重关系」，录音通篇没有这种说法。相反，录音说他们把小分歧当作关系终结的信号，是「轻易抛弃关系」的方向，不是「更看重关系」。

What makes the man choose to buy jeans made in Japan?

比较级 higher / denser / more durable 集中爆发。the fabric they use is of a higher quality 与 more durable than any other jeans in the world 连用三处比较级——比较级在听力里几乎等同于『考点信号灯』，它在为日本牛仔裤的某项属性给出对比性证据。

• the fabric they use is of a higher quality↔Their quality.原文 higher quality 直接对应选项 quality
• more durable than any other jeans in the world↔Their quality.durable 是 quality 的下位表现

• A)原词陷阱原文 They should be around $500. 提到了具体价格，让粗心的考生听到数字就奔『price』；但价格出现在男士交代规格那段，根本不是他选择日本货的『理由』，男士选日本货的理由集中在第 9 段的质量描述，Their price. 是典型原词陷阱。

  借用原文：They should be around $500.

• B)未提及全文没有出现任何关于 color 的描述，Their color. 属于无中生有；它和 quality/design 一样是『物品属性词』，被列在这里只为凑成四项并列结构干扰考生。
• D)原词陷阱原文末段 they're very fashionable too 与 But they are very special 容易让人联想到『款式好』而选 Their design.；但 fashionable/special 在原文里是男士补充说明价格值不值时的次要修饰，不是他选『日本货』的核心理由——核心理由是第 9 段集中讲的质量。

  借用原文：they're very fashionable too

Why is the woman puzzled by the man's request?

心理动词过去式 had no idea / would have thought。I had no idea Japan made jeans 与 I would have thought America made the best jeans 紧跟 because it's a typical American garment——『原本以为…因为它是典型美国服饰』这一句直接交代了女士困惑的根源。

• it's a typical American garment↔Jeans are a typical American garment.代词 it 还原为 jeans 后字面等同

• B)原词陷阱原文 I would have thought America made the best jeans 与 more durable than any other jeans in the world 都出现了 best 类用语，容易误导考生选含 best-known 的 America makes the best-known brands of jeans.；但女士原话说的是 best jeans（最好的牛仔裤），不是 best-known brands（最知名的品牌），后者是偷换概念。

  借用原文：I would have thought America made the best jeans

• C)张冠李戴原文 Japan still has some very old mills with the traditional weaving tools 说的是『日本』有传统织布工具，America has the best weaving tools in the world. 把这条属性硬安到 America 头上，是典型张冠李戴；同时女士困惑的依据也不是『美国有最好的织布工具』，而是『牛仔裤是美国典型服饰』。

  借用原文：Japan still has some very old mills with the traditional weaving tools

• D)未提及原文从未做过『美国牛仔裤种类比日本多』的比较，Jeans are available in a greater variety in America. 凭空造出 greater variety 这一比较，属未提及。

What does the man say about the dyes of Japanese jeans?

dyes are natural 是关键词后直接表语。the dyes are natural——题干关键词 dyes 在原文里只出现一次，紧跟 are + 形容词 natural，完全是『关键词原句锁定 + 表语取答』的标准结构。

• the dyes are natural↔They are natural.原词复现下的指代还原

• A)与原文相反They are artificial. 是 the dyes are natural 的直接反义，原文明确说染料是天然的，artificial 与之极性相反，属于反向干扰。

  借用原文：the dyes are natural

• C)答非所问原文整段 9 强调日本牛仔裤独特优良（traditional weaving tools / superior / denser weave），容易让人选 They are unique.；但题干特定问 dyes，原文给的形容词是 natural，unique 是把『整段对日本牛仔裤的整体评价』错位安到 dyes 头上。

  借用原文：But the end result is surely superior.

• D)答非所问原文 But they are very special. 中的 special 形容的是『日本牛仔裤这件物品』，不是 dyes；They are special. 把整体的 special 嫁接到了局部 dyes 上，与 C 同类错法。

  借用原文：But they are very special.

What does the man say about Japanese jeans at the end of the conversation?

让步 but + 下结论 I think…totally worth it。They are a little pricey, yes. But they are very special. 是让步转折，I think they're totally worth it. 是男士在对话末段亲口下的结论——But 之后才是真意，I think + totally 是态度题答案句的金信号。

• I think they're totally worth it.↔They are worth the price.totally worth it 与 worth the price 同义
• they will last me several years↔They are worth the price.耐用是『值这个价』的下位证据

• A)原词陷阱原文 Do you typically spend that much on a pair of casual trousers? 里 casual 出现在女士的反问中，并非男士对 Japanese jeans 的表态；They are for casual wearing. 直接搬走 casual 一词制造熟悉感，但题干特定问『男士说』，casual 不是男士的观点。

  借用原文：Do you typically spend that much on a pair of casual trousers?

• B)未提及原文从未提到日本牛仔裤『在男生中流行』，They are popular with boys. 完全是从『jeans 这种衣物大众印象=年轻男孩穿的』的常识跳过来的，与录音内容无关。
• C)与原文相反原文 They are a little pricey, yes. 确实承认贵，They are much too pricey. 把这句话强化为『贵得过分』；但男士紧跟一个 But 把态度翻到 totally worth it，C 只取了让步前半、丢了真意。much too pricey 的『过分嫌贵』也与男士的 a little pricey + 值得相矛盾。

  借用原文：They are a little pricey, yes.

How does the speaker feel every time he walks out of a superhero movie?

题干与原文几乎同句开篇。Every time I walk out of a superhero movie, I feel the same way. 这句与题干 every time he walks out of a superhero movie 几乎逐词对应，紧跟其后的 I experience a sense of longing, realizing that there should be more in life. 就是对感受的具体说明——一句话点题、下一句给答案，是篇章题最常见的开门见山结构。

• a sense of longing↔desireslonging 与 desire 同义
• there should be more in life↔more in life原话直接搬

• B)未提及He wants to see it again. 原文从头到尾没说“想再看一遍”，only 说每次走出影院都有同样的感受——这是把“every time（每次都）”误读成了“want to see again（想再看）”。
• C)原词陷阱He feels as inspired as other audience members. 盗用了原文 being inspired 这个词，但原文是说“hero stories 让人 inspired”是普遍道理，且根本没说“和其他观众一样被启发”——加了“as … as other audience members”这层比较，是凭空添料。

  借用原文：being inspired

• D)He longs to become a superstar himself. 用了 longs 这个 long 的近义动词来引诱，但原文只说“渴望生活里有更多东西”，从未说“渴望自己也成为超级巨星”——这是把抽象的“渴望”过度具体化成“想当超级巨星”。

  借用原文：I experience a sense of longing

What does the passage say about the plot of all superhero movies?

题干关键词 plot 原词复现 + 冒号定义式说明。The plot of each superhero film has become relatively predictable 里 plot 与题干 the plot of all superhero movies 是同一指代，冒号后面用“世界陷入危机→英雄出场→英雄解危→拯救世界”五段式具体例证 predictable——既给定义又给例证，是答案句的典型信号。

• relatively predictable↔relatively predictable原词原义直接复现

• A)原词陷阱It is rather unrealistic. 盗用了原文 numerous punches that land unrealistically well 里的 unrealistically，但原文说的是“拳头打得不真实”，是描写动作镜头，不是说整个 plot（剧情）不现实——把局部修饰偷换成整体判断。

  借用原文：numerous punches that land unrealistically well

• B)张冠李戴It is extremely artistic. 里 artistic 一词在原文出现的位置是第 3 段 They say the films lack any form of artistry.——是精英说“缺乏 artistry”，恰好与“extremely artistic”相反；且谈论对象是 films 整体而非 plot。

  借用原文：They say the films lack any form of artistry.

• C)It is somewhat complicated. 与原文判断方向相反——第 3 段 These movies are criticized as being too simple. 明说被批评为 too simple（太简单），与 complicated（复杂）完全对立。

  借用原文：These movies are criticized as being too simple.

What do the elites of American society think of superhero movies?

题干主语 elites 原词出现 + 三连否定评价。The elites of our society have rejected superhero films. 中的 elites 与题干 the elites of American society 一致，紧跟 They say 与 are criticized 两个评价领句词，连出三句负面评价（rejected / lack any form of artistry / too simple），其中最后一句 too simple 就是核心答案信号。

• These movies are criticized as being too simple.↔They are too simple.被动转主动 + too simple 原词复现

• A)原词陷阱They are biased against women. 盗用了原文 women desire to play an irreplaceable role 里的 women 一词，但第 4 段是作者引用作家观点说“女性想参与伟大冒险”，跟精英的看法毫无关系；且原文从未说电影“对女性有偏见”。

  借用原文：women desire to play an irreplaceable role in a great adventure

• B)过度推断They are basically misleading. 用 misleading 替换了原文里的批评，但原文精英的批评只有“lack artistry”和“too simple”，没有任何“误导观众”的意思——属于自行升级原文负评的过度推断。
• C)未提及They are full of shootings. 里的 shootings（枪战）一词在原文里根本没出现，唯一接近的是 numerous punches（拳头），但 punches 是打斗、不是枪战，且这是讲套路不是精英观点。

What does the passage say about storytelling?

首段并列直陈句。这是录音开头一气连说的核心结论之一：Telling stories is one of the most powerful means leaders have to influence, teach and inspire. 之后紧跟 Storytelling forges connections among people.，用 forges 这个动作动词直接给 storytelling 下功能判断，是典型的『答案落在直陈结论句』的信号。

• forges connections among people↔help connect people动词同义＋名转动

• A)原词陷阱录音首句出现 means leaders have to influence, teach and inspire，A 项把 leaders 与 leadership 嫁接成 highlight leadership，听到 leaders 就想选 A 是典型原词陷阱；但原文是说『讲故事是领导者影响他人的手段』，并未说讲故事能突显领导力。

  借用原文：means leaders have to influence, teach and inspire

• C)原词陷阱录音里出现 influence, teach and inspire，inspire 的宾语并不是 creative thinking；C 项把 inspire 抓出来后强行接上 creative thinking，构成『词对了搭配错了』的原词陷阱。

  借用原文：influence, teach and inspire

• D)偷换概念原文第二段确实有 help solidify relationships，D 项把 solidify 留住、把 relationships 偷换成 friendship，缩小了范围。讲故事建立的是各种关系（包括职场关系），不专指友谊。

  借用原文：help solidify relationships

What can good stories do to listeners according to the passage?

主语 They + listener 直接出现。第三段开头 Good stories do more than create a sense of connection. 起句后，紧跟一句 They allow the listener to enter the story, making them more open to learning。主语 They 回指 Good stories、对象 listener 直接出现，是题干两要素正合的句子，几乎一定是答案句。

• making them more open to learning↔more open to learning几乎原句搬运

• A)与原文相反录音里讲 more engaging than the recital of data points，意思是故事比『罗列数据』更吸引人——『让听众背数据』恰恰是讲故事要避免的反例。A 项把这个反向参照偷换成『允许他们背数据』，方向反了。

  借用原文：more engaging than the recital of data points

• C)偷换概念录音说 Good stories can contain multiple meanings, so they're surprisingly economical in conveying complex ideas in graspable ways.，意思是故事能以可理解的方式传达复杂观点，但没说『让听者记住 main idea』。C 项把 graspable ways 与 conveying ideas 模糊归并成『记住主旨』，属于概念偷换。

  借用原文：conveying complex ideas in graspable ways

• D)原词陷阱录音里既出现 more engaging than the recital of data points or a discussion of abstract ideas，D 项就把 engage 和 discussion 拼凑成 engage in discussions，但原文是把『抽象观点的讨论』当成对照面，并不是说故事让听者参与讨论。

  借用原文：a discussion of abstract ideas

What can leaders do with a simple personal story?

题干双锚点同句出现。第四段中 with a simple personal story, they can convey fundamental values 一句同时出现 simple personal story（与题干 a simple personal story 完全对应）与代词 they（回指上文的 leaders），是题干两个关键词联合命中的句子，必然就是答案承载句。

• convey fundamental values↔Convey fundamental values原句搬运

• A)原词陷阱录音末句出现 they are more likely to inspire others to want to know more，A 项把 inspire 抓出来后接上 listeners' imagination，但原文是说激发别人『想了解更多』而非激发『想象力』；inspire 的宾语被偷换了。

  借用原文：inspire others to want to know more

• C)张冠李戴录音里 They can offer insight into the evolution of their own experience and knowledge，their own experience 指的是 leaders 自己的经验，而且动作是『提供洞察』而非『丰富经验』；C 项把『让别人看见自己的经验』偷换成『丰富他们的经验』，主体与动作都偏了。

  借用原文：offer insight into the evolution of their own experience and knowledge

• D)原词陷阱录音里出现 offer insight into the evolution of their own experience and knowledge，D 项 Explain insightful ideas. 用 insightful 这个同根词钓人，但原文动作是『提供对自身经验演变的洞见』，不是『解释富有洞见的观点』；同根词＋搭配错位是典型陷阱。

  借用原文：offer insight into the evolution of their own experience and knowledge

What does the passage say statistics prove?

开头点题 + 题干关键词 statistics 原词出现。这句话出现在 P1，正是篇章的开篇点题句；题干里的关键词 statistics prove 在原文里以 statistics prove it 原词出现，it 指代的就是前半句 immigrants are still contributing to America today——这是典型的「代词回指找答案」信号。

• immigrants are still contributing to America today↔Immigrants have been contributing to the U.S.are still contributing today 与 have been contributing 的时态同义改写

• A)原词陷阱选项 Immigrants outnumber U.S.-born Americans. 把录音里反复出现的 immigrants 和后文 U.S.-born individuals 拼到一起，编造出「移民人数超过本土美国人」的关系，但原文从未比较两群体的人数。

  借用原文：From 1996 to 2016, the pace at which immigrants started businesses was double that of U.S.-born individuals.

• C)原词陷阱选项 Another wave of immigrants is hitting the U.S. 盗用了原文 successive waves of immigrants 里的 wave 一词，但原文说的是「美国由一波波移民建立」，不是「现在又来一波」，时间和事件都被改了。

  借用原文：The U.S. was founded by successive waves of immigrants

• D)与原文相反选项 The number of immigrants to the U.S. is declining. 说移民数量在下降，但原文 immigrants are still contributing to America today 强调的是移民在持续贡献，且后文还说从 1996 到 2016 移民创业速度是本土的两倍，整体方向是积极的，不存在数量下降。

  借用原文：immigrants are still contributing to America today

What do we learn about immigrants in the U.S., compared with native-born Americans?

比较结构 double that of + 递进 aren't just…They're often succeeding。double that of U.S.-born individuals 是与题干 compared with native-born Americans 直接对应的比较信号；紧接着的 Immigrants aren't just becoming entrepreneurs more frequently. They're often succeeding. 是 not just…but also 类递进结构，递进后面的 succeeding 是这道题的真正落点。

• Immigrants aren't just becoming entrepreneurs more frequently. They're often succeeding.↔More of them are successful business people.「entrepreneurs + succeeding」概括为「successful business people」
• Over 40% of Fortune 500 companies had a founder who was either an immigrant or the child of one↔More of them are successful business people.用 Fortune 500 创始人占比作为「成功生意人多」的具象证据

• A)原词陷阱选项 More of them expect their children to succeed in business. 盗用了原文 the child of one 里的 child，编出「期望子女在事业上成功」这一根本没说的意思。原文只是说 Fortune 500 创始人有的是移民、有的是移民子女，并未提及移民对子女的期望。

  借用原文：Over 40% of Fortune 500 companies had a founder who was either an immigrant or the child of one.

• B)与原文相反选项 They have fewer chances to be hired by U.S. companies. 说移民被美国公司雇佣的机会更少，但原文整段说的是移民自己创业、自己当 founder，根本不是「被雇佣」的角度，更没说机会更少。

  借用原文：the pace at which immigrants started businesses was double that of U.S.-born individuals

• C)原词陷阱选项 They have founded most Fortune 500 companies. 盗用了录音里非常醒目的 Fortune 500，但原文是 Over 40% of Fortune 500 companies had a founder who was either an immigrant or the child of one，是「超过 40%」且「创始人之一是移民或移民子女」，绝不是 most（大多数）。这是典型的范围/程度被偷改。

  借用原文：Over 40% of Fortune 500 companies had a founder who was either an immigrant or the child of one.

What does the passage say about immigrants in the U.S., in terms of financial strength?

比较结构 lower…than + 因果信号 This results in。significantly lower levels of debt than native-born Americans 是与题干 compared with native-born Americans 完全对应的比较句；前面的 This results in 是因果信号，把「少用信贷」的原因和「债务更低」的结果连起来，使这句成为本段的核心结论句。

• This results in significantly lower levels of debt than native-born Americans.↔Their level of debt is lower than that of native-born Americans.几乎是原文的「近义同结构改写」

• A)与原文相反选项 They have higher installment loan debt than native-born Americans. 盗用了原文 installment loan debt，但原文明确说移民的债务「显著更低」，这里却说「更高」，方向完全反掉。

  借用原文：This results in significantly lower levels of debt than native-born Americans.

• B)张冠李戴选项 Nineteen percent of them borrow money from friends and family. 盗用了原文 just 19% of the general population 里的 19% 和后文 they borrow money from friends and family 中的借钱方式，但 19% 在原文里指的是 general population（一般人口）里「没有信用卡或分期贷款债务」的比例，根本不是「19% 的移民找亲友借钱」。两个原词被强行拼到一起，是典型的张冠李戴。

  借用原文：just 19% of the general population

• D)原词陷阱选项 Thirty-four percent of them use credit for their daily purchases. 盗用了原文 34% of Americans born in Latin America 的 34%，但原文是说 34% 的拉美裔美国人「没有」信用卡或分期贷款债务，选项却说「34% 的人用信用卡做日常消费」，对象不对、行为也反过来了，还加上了 daily purchases 这个原文没有的限定。

  借用原文：34% of Americans born in Latin America report no credit card or installment loan debt.

What do immigrants do to achieve their goals in the U.S.?

设问句 Why + 解释句中的 values and habits。Why are immigrants doing so well? 是篇章独白里典型的设问句，紧接着的 The values and habits they bring from their own homelands help explain some of the success. 是直接回答这个设问的解释句，整段功能就是「解释移民达成目标的原因」。这是篇章独白里最强的「答案信号」之一。

• The values and habits they bring from their own homelands↔Keep their traditional values and old habits.「从故乡带来的价值观和习惯」=「保留传统价值观和旧习惯」
• individuals must save more in order to achieve their goals↔Keep their traditional values and old habits.in order to achieve their goals 与题干呼应，save more 是 old habits 的具体表现

• B)原词陷阱选项 Find employment in competitive businesses. 盗用了原文反复出现的 businesses，但原文说的是移民自己 started businesses（自己创业），而非 find employment（找工作被雇佣），且原文从未提及行业「竞争激烈」。

  借用原文：the pace at which immigrants started businesses was double that of U.S.-born individuals

• C)与原文相反选项 Borrow money from financial institutions. 盗用了原文 they borrow money from friends and family rather than a bank 里的 borrow money，但原文明确说移民是「找亲友借，而不是找银行」，financial institutions（金融机构）正好就是 bank 那一边，选项把方向反掉了。rather than 是这道题的关键否定信号。

  借用原文：they borrow money from friends and family rather than a bank

• D)未提及选项 Collaborate with native-born Americans. 提出「与本土美国人合作」，但全文只出现「移民 vs 本土美国人」的对比，从未提及二者合作。属于无中生有。