2021年6月·第1套 英语四级听力真题原文与答案解析

What did Joe's parents decide to do?

Rather than后的转折落点。答案信号是句首的 Rather than shutting down the habit of drawing——"而不是去扼杀"。Rather than 是一个含蓄否定的转折标志：它先抛出一个被否定的做法（禁止画画），真正做的事在它后面的 decided to encourage his creativity by sending their son to an after-school art class。转折/否定之后才是落点，这是听力定位的核心信号。

• sending their son to an after-school art class↔Send him to an after-school art class.几乎原句对应

• A)原词陷阱A 说"给他报名 Newcastle 足球俱乐部"。录音确实念到了 He's great at football. 和地名 Newcastle，但那是第3段描述乔"球踢得好"，第2段 Newcastle 是餐厅所在地，根本没有"父母给他报足球队"这回事。它把零散原词拼成了假事件。

  借用原文：He's great at football.

• C)与原文相反C 说"禁止他在练习册上画画"。录音里 shutting down the habit of drawing in his school's workbook 确实提到"扼杀在练习册上画画的习惯"，但它前面有 Rather than——是父母"没有"做的事。C 恰恰取了被转折否定掉的那半句，方向反了。

  借用原文：shutting down the habit of drawing in his school's workbook

• D)张冠李戴D 说"帮他把画发到网上"。录音里 His teacher recognized Joe's talent and posted all his work online 确实有"发到网上"，但做这件事的是"老师"，不是"父母"。题问的是父母，把老师的行为安到父母头上，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：His teacher recognized Joe's talent and posted all his work online

What did the restaurant "Number 4" do?

题目同序顺听定位。新闻题目通常与播报同序：第1题答案在第1段，第2题就顺听到第2段。本段开头 A restaurant named "Number 4" in Newcastle contacted Joe's teacher 一出现餐厅这个主语，就是第2题的答案句。顺着播报次序接题，不用回跳。

• contacted Joe's teacher to ask if the 9-year-old could come and decorate its dining-room↔Contacted Joe to decorate its dining-room.concise概括对应

• B)过度推断B 说"雇佣乔粉刷其建筑的所有墙面"。录音确实有 put his ideas straight on the wall（把想法画到墙上），但 B 把它夸成 paint all the walls（所有墙），还说成 Hired（雇佣、含付薪），录音只说 contacted...to ask（联系询问），既没说付钱雇佣、也没说所有墙面。

  借用原文：put his ideas straight on the wall

• C)偷换概念C 说"翻新了厨房和所有的用餐区"。录音说的是 decorate its dining-room——装饰"用餐区"，C 一是把 decorate（用画装饰）偷换成 Renovated（整体翻新装修），二是凭空加了 kitchen（厨房）和 all（所有），范围和动作都被放大，录音都没说。

  借用原文：decorate its dining-room

• D)原词陷阱D 说"请求乔授权使用他网上的画"。录音里 posted all his work online 确有"发到网上"，但那是老师发画的动作，餐厅这边只是 contacted Joe's teacher to ask if the 9-year-old could come——请人来现场画，根本没有"求授权用网上的画"这回事。online 是被挪用的原词。

  借用原文：posted all his work online

What is Kirsteen Marshall trying to do?

begging 点出真实目的。这一句里 begging for the safe return of her beloved pet dog 是表意图的动词短语，直接道出她做这一切的根本目的，是承载答案的信号句；前面 posted a tearful video 只是她采取的手段。

• begging for the safe return of her beloved pet dog↔Get her pet dog back求平安归来=把狗找回

• B)原词陷阱录音确实说她 posted an image of a man suspected of stealing the dog，B 盗用了这里的 suspect 原词，但发嫌疑人照片是她找狗路上的一个中间手段，不是她『努力要达成』的目的，答非所问。

  借用原文：After combing through the security video outside a Gorbals shop, Kirsteen has now posted an image of a man suspected of stealing the dog

• C)答非所问录音末尾只说 Police are investigating the incident.，是警方在查案，并没有说她去『乞求警方帮忙』；C 把警方的存在偷换成她的诉求，与题干问的『她想做什么』错位。

  借用原文：Police are investigating the incident.

• D)原词陷阱录音说她 posted a tearful video on social media，D 盗用 social media、post 原词，但发社交媒体只是她为找回狗采取的途径，跟 B 一样是手段而非她要达成的目的。

  借用原文：posted a tearful video on social media Wednesday

What does the news report say about Kirsteen Marshall's family?

family+具体金额坐实。这一句以题干主语 The family 起头，并给出具体金额 offering a £5,000 reward，主语对上、又带数字，正是承载答案的信号句；预读时圈的 reward 在此被坐实。

• offering a £5,000 reward for the safe return of the dog↔offering a big reward to anyone who helps5000镑=一大笔悬赏
• We'll pay that to anyone who brings him home↔to anyone who helps带它回家者=帮忙者

• A)过度推断录音第一段说她发了 a tearful video（含泪视频），A 据此推出全家『受了很大煎熬』，但报道只描述了行动（发视频、悬赏），并未陈述家人正承受痛苦这一事实，属于在原文情绪线索上推过了头。

  借用原文：posted a tearful video on social media Wednesday

• B)张冠李戴录音说 Police are investigating the incident.，是警方在调查；B 盗用 police、investigation 原词，却把『警方查案』安到了家人头上，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：Police are investigating the incident.

• C)未提及全篇只讲发视频、贴嫌疑人照片、悬赏、警方调查，从没说过把案子告上 local district court；C 是录音里完全没有依据的动作，属凭空添加。

What does Guy Wilson say his café aims to do?

表目的的 aims to / wants to。这句里 aims to build community和 wants to provide a bridge for people to connect接连出现两个表目的的信号词；预读时锁定的就是它们，听到"aims to"后面那串内容即答案区，无须再往后听。

• provide a bridge for people to connect↔Help people connect with each other.搭桥让人连接=帮人互相连接

• A)偷换概念原文说店主靠 providing affordable breakfasts（提供负担得起的早餐）来搭桥，affordable 是"付得起、便宜"，并不等于 free（免费）；A 把"affordable"夸大成 free meals，又添了"the local poor（当地穷人）"这个原文没指明的对象，是听到"早餐"就误选的陷阱。

  借用原文：providing affordable breakfasts

• C)原词陷阱原文只说该地区 has been divided by class and wealth（被阶层和财富所割裂），店是想在这种环境里"搭桥连接"，从没说要 eliminate（消除）阶层差异。C 盗用了 class 这个原词，再把"搭桥"夸大成"消除差异"——听到 class 就选它正中陷阱。

  借用原文：has been divided by class and wealth

• D)未提及原文明确老板要的是 build community, rather than profits（营造社区而非利润），目标根本不在"服务档次"上；D 的 first-class service（一流服务）属于无中生有，还隐隐与"不追求利润"的取向相反，是用一个听起来"高大上"的褒义短语来诱选。

What does the news report say about Eggs & Bread café?

否定 doesn't + 转折 but。答案句靠 doesn't use volunteers这个明确否定，加上 but pays its staff的转折点出真意——"不用义工、改用付薪员工"。否定词与转折词同现，正是答案落点的强信号。

• doesn't use volunteers↔It does not use volunteers.doesn't=does not，几乎原句

• A)与原文相反原文说店 has two members of staff or supervisors on shift every day（每天有两名员工或主管值班），明明是"有人盯班、管得到"；A 盗用 supervisors / staff 这层意思却反过来说 does not supervise its employees（不监管员工），与原文相反，是听到"supervisor"就误选的陷阱。

  借用原文：has two members of staff or supervisors on shift every day

• B)原词陷阱原文说店 doesn't take donations and doesn't want to be seen as a charity（不接受捐款、也不想被当成慈善机构）；B 盗用 donations / charity 两个原词，却说成 donates regularly to a local charity（定期向当地慈善机构捐款），方向完全反了——这是"听到 charity 就选"的高诱惑陷阱。

  借用原文：doesn't take donations and doesn't want to be seen as a charity

• D)偷换概念原文说店 is open in the mornings every day of the year（一年中每天早上营业）；D 的 open round the clock 是"24 小时全天候"，把"每天早上"夸大成"全天不打烊"，是听到 open every day 就误选的时间细节陷阱。

  借用原文：is open in the mornings every day of the year

What happens when people start to know each other according to Guy Wilson?

条件 when + 结果 they realize / will have。答案句以 when people start to know other people around them起头，后面 they realize they're not that different和 most people will have something in common就是结果。题干的 when 与原文的 when 对齐，结果就在 when 之后，顺着听即可锁定。

• most people will have something in common with each other↔They will find they have something in common.have something in common 原样保留

• A)未提及原文老板谈的是人们会 realize they're not that different（意识到彼此没那么不同），从没说他们会意识到 communication（沟通）的重要性；A 的"沟通"是原文没有的概念，属凭"咖啡馆=交流"的常识补出来的项。
• B)原词陷阱café 一词录音里反复出现，B 的 come to the café even more frequently（更频繁地来店）就借这个原词诱选；但原文谈的是人熟了之后"意识到彼此相似"，根本没说人们会更常来，属听到 café 就选的答非所问。

  借用原文：when people start to know other people around them

• C)偷换概念原文说 whatever their financial background, or their educational background, most people will have something in common（无论何种背景，大多有共同点）；C 盗用 background 原词，却把结论换成 care less about their own background（更少在意自己的背景）——原文讲"有共同点"，不是讲"在意程度变低"，是 D 的近义干扰项。

  借用原文：whatever their financial background, or their educational background, most people will have something in common

What are the speakers mainly talking about?

开头点题定主线。对话第一句 what time do you think we should have the party on Saturday 一上来就把周六聚会摆出来，紧接着女方说 we'll have the afternoon to prepare food and drink，之后几段一直在谈准备食物、买饮料、放音乐——开头点题加上全程不离筹备聚会，主线就此锁定。

• prepare food and drink↔Preparations动词 prepare 转名词 Preparations
• the party on Saturday↔Saturday's get-togetherparty 与 get-together 同义

• A)原词陷阱A surprise party for Paul's birthday. 借了录音末尾真出现的人名 Paul，但原文 we should ask Paul to bring his computer and speakers 只是请 Paul 带设备放音乐，从没说这是给 Paul 办的生日惊喜会，听到 Paul 就选属于原词陷阱。

  借用原文：ask Paul to bring his computer and speakers

• B)未提及Travel plans for the coming weekend. 借了周末这个时间框，但全程谈的是在家办聚会、买东西，没有半句出行旅行，把周末筹备聚会偷换成周末旅行计划，属未提及内容。
• D)原词陷阱The new market on the other side of town. 确实是录音 that big new supermarket on the other side of town 念到的，但它只是买饮料时顺带提的一个去处，是细节而非全篇主线，主旨题选了细节就以偏概全。

  借用原文：that big new supermarket on the other side of town

Why does the woman say it is a good idea to serve foods that guests can help themselves to?

it's better to 引出真正理由。女方先说自助取餐 so that people can just help themselves，再用 It's better to let people walk around and talk to each other 给出她认为好的真正原因——it's better to 这个引出理由的信号句，正是答案落点。

• let people walk around and talk to each other↔enables guests to walk around and chat freelytalk 换 chat、let 换 enables

• A)未提及It makes the hostess's job a whole lot easier. 听着合理，但原文女方给的理由是让客人能走动交谈，从没说这能让女主人活儿更轻松，属于自己顺势补的推断，原文未提。
• C)未提及It saves considerable time and labor. 是常识里自助餐的好处，但本题问的是女方说的理由，她说的是社交自由不是省时省力，录音并未把节省时间精力当作理由，属未提及。
• D)原词陷阱It requires fewer tables and chairs. 原文虽提到 sit down at the table，但只是说不必正式围桌吃饭，从没说自助能少用桌椅，这是借了 table 一词的推断，原文未作此理由。

  借用原文：getting everyone to sit down at the table

What does the woman say about the new supermarket?

女方直接陈述听到的信息。题干问的是 the woman，而正是女方在第 6 段说 I heard that the new supermarket offers some big discounts——说话人正确（女方）加上直接陈述新超市的特点，这句就是答案句。

• the new supermarket offers some big discounts↔It offers some big discounts.几近原句的精简

• B)未提及It is quite close to her house. 原文从没说这家新超市离谁家近，反而男方说 the other side of town（在城另一头），与近相反，属未提及甚至相反。
• C)未提及It is more spacious and less crowded. 听着像大超市该有的样子，但录音对新超市只说了打折和在城另一头，从没提宽敞或人少，属未提及。
• D)原词陷阱It sells local wines and soft drinks. 借了录音里真出现的 some beer and wine、other soft drinks，但那是男方说我们要买的饮料清单，不是在描述新超市卖什么，把买什么错安成超市卖什么，属原词陷阱兼张冠李戴。

  借用原文：get some beer and wine, and some fruit juice, and other soft drinks

What does the man suggest they ask Paul to do?

ask…to 引出被建议的动作。男方用提议句 Maybe we should ask Paul to bring his computer and speakers——Maybe we should ask…to 这个建议信号直接点出请 Paul 做的事，是答案句。

• bring his computer and speakers↔Bring his computer and speakers.近乎原词的动作短语

• A)答非所问Cook a dish for the party. 蹭了前文谈食物 prepare some sandwiches and snacks 的话题，但请 Paul 做的事是带设备放音乐，跟做菜无关，属答非所问。

  借用原文：prepare some sandwiches and snacks

• B)未提及Arrive 10 minutes earlier. 原文只在第 2 段说客人六点来，从没让 Paul 早到十分钟，数字和动作都是凭空添的，属未提及。
• C)未提及Prepare a few opening remarks. 原文从没提让 Paul 致辞或准备开场白，整个对话也没出现演讲环节，纯属凭空编造，属未提及。

Why does the woman want to have a car?

转折 but 之后落真意。女士先说 I wouldn't need to use it every day（不用每天开），紧跟一个转折 but，but 之后 very convenient to have one for the weekends 才是她真正想要车的理由。听力里转折词后面那半句几乎总是落点，前半句多是铺垫或干扰。

• convenient to have one for the weekends↔For convenience at weekends.形容词转名词、说法基本同形

• A)未提及For commuting to work."为了上下班通勤"是常识里买车最常见的理由，听起来很顺，但全文女士从没说过上班通勤，反而强调 I wouldn't need to use it every day（不用每天开），与通勤正相反。
• B)未提及For long-distance travel."用于长途出行"原文同样只字未提；女士只说周末用、不必天天用，没有任何关于长途旅行的信息。
• C)原词陷阱For getting around in Miami. 盗用了原文出现过的地名 Miami 和短语"代步"，但原文 I actually owned a car for a little while when I lived in Miami 说的是"过去住 Miami 时"曾有车，那是往事，不是她现在想买车的理由。听到 Miami 就选，正中圈套。

  借用原文：when I lived in Miami

What does the woman say about German cars?

钩子词 German cars 后的直接评价。原文 I've heard that German cars are very reliable 里，钩子词 German cars 一出现，紧跟的形容词 reliable 就是女士给出的评价，正是答案句。这里的信号是"听音钩子词 + 其后的描述词"。

• German cars are very reliable↔They are reliable.原词保留＋代词替名词

• B)张冠李戴They are compact."小巧"挪用了女士后面说的 I'd also like it to be small（希望车小一点），但那是她对"想买的车"的个人偏好，并不是她"对德国车的评价"，把愿望安到了德国车头上，问的是德国车特点，答非所问。

  借用原文：I'd also like it to be small

• C)未提及They are spacious."宽敞"原文完全没出现，且与女士"想要小车"的偏好正好相反，是用一个和 B 反义的形容词来凑数干扰。
• D)张冠李戴They are easy to drive. 盗用了原文 so that it's easy to drive in the city，但那句是接着"想要小车"说的——小车在城里好开，讲的是她想买的小车，不是德国车的特点，对象搞错了。

  借用原文：so that it's easy to drive in the city

What does the man recommend the woman do?

建议句 I could…/you could… 是落点。男士用 I could give you his phone number 和 you could call him and ask him questions 这种 could 引出的婉转建议句给出主意——找他那位懂车的朋友咨询。建议类题目的答案就落在这种 "you could… / I could…" 句上。

• I have a friend who sells second-hand cars↔Seek advice from his friendhis friend 原义保留
• you could call him and ask him questions↔Seek advice from his friend详述动作概括为求教

• A)原词陷阱Buy a second-hand car. 盗用了原文 a friend who sells second-hand cars 里的 second-hand cars，但那只是介绍朋友"卖二手车"的身份，男士建议的是"去问他"，不是"去买二手车"；女士还明确说 I don't want to feel obliged to buy one of his cars（不想被逼着买车）。听到 second-hand 就选即落陷阱。

  借用原文：a friend who sells second-hand cars

• B)与原文相反Trust her own judgment."相信自己的判断"恰好和原文相反：女士最后说 I could use some help in deciding、Speaking to an expert would be a good idea（需要帮助、找行家聊聊好），说明她接受了"求助"而非"靠自己判断"，更不是男士的建议。

  借用原文：I could use some help in deciding

• D)未提及Look around before deciding."先多看看再决定"是买东西的常识做法，听着合理，但男士的建议自始至终是"找他朋友问"，从没说过"先到处比较"，属脑补出来的干扰。

What do we learn about the man's friend from the conversation?

对人品的强调：never pressure or cheat。男士强调 he would never try to pressure you or cheat you（绝不施压、绝不欺骗），加上女士随后说 if you trust him, then, I guess it should be OK，两处合起来把重点落在"这位朋友可信"上。信号是"对人品的反复强调 + 对方表示信任"。

• he would never try to pressure you or cheat you↔He can be trusted否定式具体描述＝肯定式概括评价
• if you trust him, then, I guess it should be OK↔He can be trustedtrust 原词印证可信

• A)与原文相反He sells new cars. 借用了原文"卖车"的信息，却把车型说反了：原文是 a friend who sells second-hand cars（卖二手车），不是新车。听到"sells…cars"就选，会被 new/second-hand 的差别绊倒。

  借用原文：a friend who sells second-hand cars

• C)原词陷阱He is starting a business. 盗用了原文 I think his family owns the business 里的 business，但原文说的是"他家族拥有这门生意（早就在做）"，不是"他正在创业（starting）"，把"已有生意"听成"开始创业"就中招。

  借用原文：his family owns the business

• D)过度推断He is a successful car dealer. 顺着"家里开车行、懂车"往下推出"成功的车商"，但原文只说他 knows a lot about cars、人好，从没评价生意"成功（successful）"，这是从已有信息多走了一步的过度推断。

  借用原文：he knows a lot about cars

What do we learn about early pigs in North America?

讲来历的开头句。本段是交代猪"从哪来"的起源段，承载答案的是收束这段经过的 This practice also allowed many pigs to escape from farms and live in the wild——它正面说出了"许多猪逃离农场进入野外"这一结果，是答案句。

• many pigs to escape from farms and live in the wild↔Many escaped from farms and became wildlive in the wild=became wild

• B)原文开篇即说 Pigs are not native to North America（猪并非北美土生），而 They were actually native to North America 恰恰说成"本来就是北美土生"，极性反了。

  借用原文：Pigs are not native to North America

• C)未提及原文只说猪 escape from farms and live in the wild（逃走进野外），从未提到"许多猪在野外觅食时被杀"，Many got killed in the wild when searching for food 是无中生有，只是借用了原文 in search of food 的影子。
• D)原文确有 Spanish and Russian explorers and settlers，但说的是他们"introduced（引入）"了猪，They were hunted by Spanish and Russian explorers 却把动作改成"hunted（猎杀）"，盗了专名、换了行为，是答非所问。

  借用原文：introduced to California by Spanish and Russian explorers and settlers

Why are wild pigs a threat to humans?

唯一含humans的句子。全段讲危害的句子很多，但点名"threaten...humans"的只有这一句 harbor dozens of diseases that threaten both humans and farm animals，题眼"对人"直接对上它，是答案句。

• harbor dozens of diseases that threaten both humans↔They carry a great many diseasesharbor=carry、dozens=many

• A)原文从未提野猪"主动攻击人"，只说携带疾病威胁人；They often make sudden attacks on people 是凭"野猪凶猛"的常识脑补，原文无据。
• B)答非所问原文确实提到野猪扰乱食物链类的生态危害（eating other animals or their food supply），但那是对其他动物/生态的危害，不是题眼问的"对人"；They break up nature's food supply chain 盗用了原文真讲过的危害，却答非所问。

  借用原文：In addition to either eating other animals or their food supply

• C)原文说野猪 rooting up grasses and rubbing on trees（拱草、蹭树）破坏原生栖息地，这是物理破坏栖息地，不是"环境污染"；They cause much environmental pollution 偷换成了 pollution，且仍不是"对人"。

  借用原文：damage native habitats by rooting up grasses and rubbing on trees

What does the passage say about the native foxes on the US island?

狐狸出现处的因果链。本段结尾交代了"野猪招来老鹰→老鹰捕食狐狸→狐狸几乎灭绝"的因果链，承载答案的是 feeding on a species of native fox 与 The foxes were almost wiped out completely 这两句，直接说出狐狸的下场，是答案句。

• feeding on a species of native fox↔They fell victim to eagles被老鹰捕食=成老鹰的猎物

• A)原文说狐狸几乎被消灭，谈不上"和平共处"；They lived peacefully with wild pigs 借用了原文反复出现的 wild pigs，却把惨烈结局说成"和平相处"，与原文相反。

  借用原文：The foxes were almost wiped out completely

• B)原文谈"food supply"是说野猪抢夺动物的食物来源，并未说狐狸"彻底断粮"；They ran out of food completely 盗用了原文的 food supply 与 completely，张冠李戴到狐狸"断粮"上，实际狐狸是被老鹰吃掉。

  借用原文：eating other animals or their food supply

• D)原文说 The eagles began breeding on the island（老鹰开始在岛上繁殖），They reproduced quickly 把"繁殖"这个动作从老鹰头上挪到了狐狸头上，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：The eagles began breeding on the island

What are a pair of entrepreneurs planning to do?

原文 planning to 与题干同词，是直接应答信号。录音第一句就用 are planning to 直接对上题干的 planning to do，这种题干问什么、原文紧接着用同一表计划的词说出来的句子，就是答案句，顺着这个信号锁定即可。

• roast coffee beans in outer space↔Roast coffee beans in outer space.原文短语与选项几乎逐词对应

• A)答非所问Taste coffee while in outer space. 借了后文做咖啡、卖咖啡的话题诱你联想到品尝，但原文这两人计划的是 roast 烘焙，从没说要在太空 taste 品尝咖啡，属答非所问。
• C)未提及Develop a new strain of coffee bean. 说培育咖啡豆新品种，原文通篇只讲烘焙现有的豆子、从未提培育新品种，属无中生有。
• D)原词陷阱Use a pressurised tank to brew coffee. 盗用了原文 in a pressurised tank 这个真出现过的原词来骗你，但原文那个加压罐是用来 roast 烘焙豆子的，不是 brew 冲泡咖啡，听到熟词就选正中圈套。

What does the passage say about coffee beans roasted on Earth?

原文 on Earth 与题干限定词重合，是定位锚。录音 on Earth, beans can easily break apart and get burned 里的 on Earth 与题干限定词完全一致，听到这个限定词就锁定本句；其后 But if gravity is removed 一转，转折后讲的是太空情形，不可拿来答 on Earth。

• get burned in the roaster↔They can easily get burned.原文与选项共用 get burned，连 easily 都对上

• B)张冠李戴They float around in the oven. 盗用原文 the beans float around in a heated oven 这句真念过的话，可那是 But if gravity is removed 之后讲的太空情形，题问的是 on Earth 地球，张冠李戴。
• C)原词陷阱They have to be heated to 360℃. 盗用原文 360 degrees of evenly distributed heat 里的 360 这个真念过的数字，可原文 360 degrees 指的是太空里受热的方位360度而非加热到360℃，且讲的也是太空情形，数字陷阱加错情形双重出错。
• D)张冠李戴They receive evenly distributed heat. 几乎照搬原文 evenly distributed heat，可这是 if gravity is removed 之后描述太空里受热均匀的好处，题问的是 on Earth 地球情形，把太空的优点安到地球头上，张冠李戴。

What did the two Italian companies do in 2015?

原文 In 2015 与题干年份重合，是定位锚。录音 In 2015, two Italian companies collaborated on the construction 同时出现 In 2015 与 two Italian companies 两个题干锚，听到它们就锁定本句，本句的主动作 collaborated 即答案。

• collaborated on the construction of a similar type of spacecraft↔They collaborated on building the first space coffee machine.construction 概括为 building，意思等值
• the first coffee machine designed for use in space↔the first space coffee machine原文长定语压缩成选项短语，所指相同

• A)张冠李戴They charged a high price for their space-roasted coffee beans. 盗用前文 how much they would charge 关于收费的话，可那是讲前文那对创业者卖咖啡定价、且只说不清收多少，根本不是2015年两家意大利公司做的事，张冠李戴。
• B)原词陷阱They set up a branch in Dubai to manufacture coffee roasters. 盗用前文 sold for the first time in Dubai 里真念过的 Dubai，可 Dubai 只是前文那对创业者公司的所在地，原文从没说意大利公司去 Dubai 设分部造烘焙机，属无中生有加张冠李戴。
• D)与原文相反They abandoned the attempt to roast coffee beans in space. 盗用原文 the first attempt to take coffee into space 里的 attempt，可原文是说2015年并非首次尝试、那两家公司是合作建成了机器，根本没说放弃，方向相反。

Why do a lot of people come to the village of Takotna every March?

因果连词 because 引出真因。这句的答案信号是因果连词 because：题干问 "为什么三月人多"，录音正好用 because it is located in the middle of a race that takes place every year 给出原因——听到 because 就该锁定其后内容为答案句。

• a race that takes place every year↔A race passes through it annuallytakes place every year = annually
• it is located in the middle of a race↔A race passes through it村在赛道中 = 赛事穿村而过

• A)未提及It is the best time for sightseeing. 说三月是观光最佳时节，但录音只讲了比赛带来人流，全程没提观光或景色好坏，属凭常识脑补出来的理由。
• C)原词陷阱They come to clean the Iditarod Trail. 偷用了录音里真出现过的赛事名 Iditarod Trail 来骗 "听到就想选"，但录音说人们是来参赛/被吸引，根本没说来 "打扫"（clean）这条小径，盗了名字却安了个录音没有的动作。

  借用原文：It is a seven-day race, called the Iditarod Trail

• D)原词陷阱It is when the villagers choose a queen. 借了录音末尾 started to refer to Jan as Queen of Takotna（村民称 Jan 为 "塔科特纳王后"）里的 queen 一词，但那只是对一个人的尊称，并非 "三月选王后" 的活动，更不是人们来访的原因，把后文的称呼挪来当来访理由。

  借用原文：Proud residents then started to refer to Jan as Queen of Takotna

What is the village of Takotna famous for?

标志短语 famous for 直接点题。答案信号就是题干同款短语 famous for：录音原话 Takotna is famous for its delicious fruit pies 与题干 famous for 用词几乎对照，听到 famous for 就锁定其后的 fruit pies 为答案。

• its delicious fruit pies↔Its tasty fruit piesdelicious = tasty 同义替换

• A)原词陷阱Its children's baking skills. 搬用了录音里真出现的 developing their baking skills（孩子们练就烘焙手艺），但录音说孩子练手艺只是全村备战的一个细节，村子 "出名" 的点录音明确说是水果派，不是孩子的手艺——盗了 baking skills 却答非所问。

  借用原文：who end up developing their baking skills at an early age

• B)未提及Its unique winter scenery. 说村子以独特冬景闻名，录音开头确实提到 cold and snowy Alaska（寒冷多雪的阿拉斯加）这一背景，但从没说村子靠 "冬景" 出名，是把 "地处雪国" 脑补成了 "以雪景著称"。

  借用原文：In cold and snowy Alaska

• D)偷换概念Its great food variety. 借了第二段 pies of all kinds, such as apple, orange, lemon or banana（各种口味的派）的 "多样" 印象，但那是在讲招待racers的派有多种口味，而村子 "出名" 的点录音说的是 fruit pies 这一招牌本身，不是 "食物种类丰富"——把口味多偷换成了出名理由。

  借用原文：delightful pies of all kinds, such as apple, orange, lemon or banana

Who comes to help with the event of the year?

范围词 whole 锁定参与主体。答案信号是表范围的 whole 加动词短语 chips in to help：录音 The whole village chips in to help 直接点出帮忙的是 "整个村子"，听到 whole village… help 就锁定它为答案句。

• The whole village chips in to help↔The entire villagewhole village = entire village

• A)答非所问The contestants. 指参赛选手，录音里他们是 The exhausted and hungry racers are greeted with delightful pies（又累又饿、被村民用派招待）的一方，是被帮的人，不是来帮忙的人，方向正好弄反。

  借用原文：The exhausted and hungry racers are greeted with delightful pies of all kinds

• C)原词陷阱Jan Newton and her friends. 借用了第三段才出现的人名 Jan Newton 来骗选，但 Jan 是后文讲 "村子出名缘起" 的人物，且录音从没说 "Jan 和她的朋友们" 来帮忙办活动——答案句明明是 "全村"，这一项把范围错误地缩成了少数人。

  借用原文：It started with one person, Jan Newton

• D)原词陷阱People from the state of Idaho. 偷用了录音里真出现的地名 Idaho（Jan moved from Idaho 指 Jan 当年从 Idaho 搬来），但录音只说 Jan 一人来自 Idaho，从没说 "一群爱达荷人" 来帮忙办活动，纯属盗用地名拼凑出的人群。

  借用原文：Jan moved from Idaho with her husband in 1972

What does the passage say about Jan Newton?

结果信号 as a result 点出她的贡献。答案信号是结果状语 as a result：录音说她的派吸引选手注意，the village gained some fame as a result（村子因此出了名）——这处因果落点正对应 "Jan 让村子出名"，是核对四项后唯一与原文相符的陈述。

• the village gained some fame as a result↔She helped the village to become famous因她而村子出名 = 她帮村子出名
• gained some fame↔become famousgain fame = become famous

• A)原词陷阱She owned a restaurant in Idaho. 偷用了录音里真出现的地名 Idaho，但录音说 Jan 是 moved from Idaho（从 Idaho 搬出来）后才 opened a restaurant，餐馆其实是开在 Takotna，不是 Idaho——盗了地名却把餐馆地点安错了。

  借用原文：Jan moved from Idaho with her husband in 1972 and opened a restaurant

• B)原词陷阱She married her husband in 1972. 偷用了录音真出现的年份 1972，但录音 Jan moved from Idaho with her husband in 1972 说的是 1972 年 "她带着丈夫搬来"（搬家），并没说 1972 年 "结婚"——而且 with her husband 说明搬来时已是丈夫，把搬家的年份硬安给了结婚。

  借用原文：Jan moved from Idaho with her husband in 1972

• C)张冠李戴She went to Alaska to compete in a race. 借了通篇反复出现的 race（比赛）一词，但录音说 Jan 是搬来开餐馆、做派招待选手，从没说她 "去阿拉斯加参赛"——去参赛的是 racers，不是 Jan，把比赛这条线张冠李戴到了她头上。

  借用原文：Her rich and filling-fruit pies quickly got the racers' attention