2024年 考研英语一阅读理解（四选一） 第 3 篇 · 31–35 题答案与解析

What can be learned about Rutkowski from the first two paragraphs 问的是从指定段落能了解到的关于人物的客观信息，没有 infer/imply 等推断信号词。

句子主干是 What can be learned about Rutkowski——被动语态 "What can be learned" 等于 "What can we learn"，重点是 about 后面的对象 Rutkowski；状语 from the first two paragraphs 限定信息来源。结构平铺直叙，无陷阱。

• A)无中生有

  前两段只说他的风格被 AI 工具大量复用，从未提及他本人对 AI 模型的态度；说他 enthusiastic about using AI models 完全无文本依据。

• B)✓ 正确
  • one of the most commonly used prompts in the new open-source AI art generator Stable Diffusion↔popular with users of an AI art generator
  • he's become a sudden hit in the new world of text-to-image AI generation↔popular with users of an AI art generator

  预判说他在 AI 生图工具用户中走红，popular with users of an AI art generator 几乎逐词对应这条预判。

• C)偷换概念

  前两段说他在 Stable Diffusion 用户中走红，从未说他获得 admiration from other illustrators——同行插画师并未在前两段出现。

• D)偷换概念

  原文只说他 uses classical painting styles to create dreamy fantasy landscapes，是"用古典画风创作幻想风景"，并非 classical painting digitalization（把古典画作数字化）。

The problem with open-source AI art generators is that they______ 是补全句式，问的是这些生成器存在的客观问题，是细节题。

主干 The problem with ... is that they ______——"The problem ... is that ..." 是 "主语 is that 表语从句" 结构，that 引导的从句是表语，空白处补充从句的谓语动词及其后内容；代词 they 回指 open-source AI art generators。结构清晰，无陷阱。

• A)与原文相反

  allows anyone to create impressive images based on text prompts 反而说它能对各类文本提示作出令人印象深刻的回应，与 lack flexibility in responding to prompts 相反。

• B)与原文相反

  原文 the system will produce something that looks not a million miles away from works in Rutkowski's style 说生成结果与某画家风格高度接近，恰恰是可预测、可模仿的，unpredictable styles 与原文方向相反。

• C)✓ 正确
  • scraping images from the Internet, often without permission and proper attribution to artists↔make unauthorized use of online images

  预判中"未经授权"对应 unauthorized，"抓网图"对应 use of online images，直接锁定 C。

• D)无中生有

  原文谈的是抓取艺术家的画作和未署名问题，从未提及收集用户个人信息；collect user information without consent 是无原文依据的捏造。

After searching online, Rutkowski found______ 直接问发现了什么客观事物，没有任何推断信号词。

主干 Rutkowski found ______——主语 + 谓语 + 待补宾语；前置 After searching online 是时间状语，约束 found 这个动作发生的时间点。结构简单，无陷阱。

• A)偷换概念

  原文 Rutkowski was initially surprised but thought it might be a good way to reach new audiences 是搜索动作之前的初始想法，并非搜索结果，a unique way to reach audiences 偷换了时间顺序。

• B)无中生有

  原文从未谈到 Rutkowski 找出了 a new method to identify AI images——这一概念整段都不存在。

• C)✓ 正确
  • work that had his name attached to it but wasn't his↔AI-generated work bearing his name

  预判说他搜到"挂他名却非他作"的画，本文主线是 AI 生图，逻辑链完全指向 AI-generated work bearing his name。

• D)过度推断

  原文段中并未说 Rutkowski 因此卷入 heated disputes regarding his copyright，第 3 段只是泛说"引发版权问题"，并非他个人正经历的激烈争议。

According to Ortiz, AI companies are advised to______ 问 Ortiz 给出的具体建议，本质是定位 Ortiz 言论中的一条具体主张。

主干 AI companies are advised to ______——被动语态 "are advised to do sth."，建议的接受方是 AI companies，待补内容是建议的具体动作不定式；前置插入语 According to Ortiz 标明建议发出者。结构清晰，注意被动语态隐藏了建议人，须靠 According to 锁定。

• A)张冠李戴

  原文 which could involve pushing for new policies or regulation 主语 The group（艺术家联盟）才是要推动新政策的一方，不是 AI 公司；campaign for new policies or regulation 把行为方从联盟偷换为 AI 公司。

• B)偷换概念

  原文说 AI 公司与博物馆、艺术家建立合作，不是 offer their services to public institutions——"建合作"与"向公共机构提供服务"动作方向和性质完全不同。

• C)无中生有

  Ortiz 通篇关注的是与艺术家、博物馆的关系和训练数据来源问题，并未建议 AI 公司 strengthen their relationships with AI users——AI 用户在 Ortiz 的言论中根本没出现。

• D)✓ 正确
  • AI models could be trained on images in the public domain↔adopt a different strategy for AI model training
  • AI companies could forge partnerships with museums and artists↔adopt a different strategy for AI model training

  预判说要改训练数据并改合作方式，adopt a different strategy for AI model training 用类别词把两条建议同时罩住，直接锁定 D。

What is the text mainly about 问全文中心话题，是典型的主旨题题干。

主干 What is the text mainly about——疑问代词 What 作 about 的宾语，be 动词后 the text 作主语；副词 mainly 修饰整句，强调"主要"。结构平铺直叙，无陷阱。

• A)✓ 正确
  • artists like Rutkowski have had enough↔Artists' responses to AI art generation
  • Other artists besides Rutkowski have been surprised by the apparent popularity of their work in text-to-image generators—and some are now fighting back↔Artists' responses to AI art generation
  • There is a coalition growing within artist industries to figure out how to tackle or mitigate this↔Artists' responses to AI art generation

  从第 3 段的情绪反应、第 4-5 段 Rutkowski 的担忧、第 6 段的反击、到第 7-8 段 Ortiz 的应对方案，全部都是 Artists' responses to AI art generation 的具体实例。

• B)偷换概念

  原文谈的是艺术家对 AI 生图的反应，不是 AI's expanded role in artistic creation；文章并未从"AI 在艺术创作中扮演了更大角色"这一正面角度展开。

• C)以偏概全

  it could raise data protection and privacy problems 只在第 7 段一处一笔带过，全文并非围绕 Privacy issues in the application of AI 展开，以此为主旨是以偏概全。

• D)无中生有

  全文未呈现支持 AI 发展和反对 AI 发展的两方对立讨论——只听到艺术家一方的担忧与应对，没有 Opposing views on AI development 所暗示的辩论结构。