2016年12月·第2套 英语六级听力真题原文与答案解析

What did the woman think of the French?

女士本人「I thought…」的直接表态。答案句是女士自己说的 I thought the French were all good cooks.，题目问女士的看法，信号就是她用第一人称 I thought 直接说出的判断——对话题里谁的看法就听谁开口说的那句。

• the French were all good cooks↔They were all good at cooking.good cooks = good at cooking 同义换说法

• B)未提及They were particular about food. 说法国人「对食物挑剔」，女士全程只说了 good cooks，从未提他们挑不挑嘴，属凭「法国人讲究吃」的常识硬套，原文未提。
• C)过度推断They were proud of their cuisine. 把「会做菜」拔高成「为自家菜系自豪」，是一种心理状态的过度推断，女士只评价了厨艺水平，没说他们自豪，原文未提。
• D)原词陷阱They were fond of bacon and eggs. 里的 bacon and eggs 确实在录音后段被念到，但那是男士讲的那顿难吃早餐，与女士对法国人的看法毫不相干，是把原词搬来骗「听到就选」。

  借用原文：Bacon and eggs.

Who did the man travel with on his first trip to Switzerland?

「I went there with…」直接交代同行人。信号是男士用 I went there with my parents' friends 直接把「和谁去」说了出来，with 后面跟的就是答案所在；细节题要抓住这种把问题点一句答清的句子。

• my parents' friends↔His parents' friends.my → His 仅人称转换，其余照搬

• A)原词陷阱His parents. 抓住了原话里的 parents，但原话是 my parents' friends（父母的「朋友」），不是父母本人。只听到 parents 就选，正中陷阱。

  借用原文：my parents' friends

• B)偷换概念His friends. 听上去也沾 friends，但原话是「父母的朋友」，不是他自己的朋友；少了 parents' 这层限定，对象就完全变了。

  借用原文：my parents' friends

• C)原词陷阱His schoolmates. 来自原文反复出现的 school（when I was at school、my father's school），但那是说他当时在上学、以及是父亲学校组织的，并非和同学同行，属听到 school 就联想成「同学」。

  借用原文：my father's school

What does the man say about the breakfast at the little French café?

对女士「有没有吃」之问的直接应答。上一段女士问 Did you actually eat it?，男士回答 No! Nobody did.——这是被问者对关键问题的直接应答，信号是这个加重的否定 No 和 Nobody did，正好回答了「这顿早餐怎么了」。

• Nobody did↔No one of the group ate it.Nobody did = No one … ate it 同义还原

• A)原词陷阱No tea was served with the meal. 说这顿没配茶，但男士描述早餐时只讲了油、培根、鸡蛋怎么做，全程没提茶；tea 一词虽在 back to teabags 出现，却是讲「想回家喝茶」，与这顿早餐配不配茶无关，原文未提。

  借用原文：back to teabags and fish and chips

• B)张冠李戴It was the real English breakfast. 几乎照搬女士那句 The real English breakfast.，但那是女士看到 bacon and eggs 时的期待，紧接着就被男士的实际遭遇推翻（没熟、没人吃），并非男士对这顿早餐的定性。

  借用原文：The real English breakfast.

• D)与原文相反It was a little overcooked. 说「有点煮过头」，但男士明说 It was hot, but it wasn't cooked.——热是热，却没熟，蛋还泡在油里、培根是生的。实际是欠火，选项说成过火，方向正相反。

  借用原文：It was hot, but it wasn't cooked.

What did the man think of his holiday in France?

结尾反语「Lovely holiday」加全篇负面基调。答案信号是结尾那句 Lovely holiday that was!——表面夸 lovely，但前文一路是「最难吃」「没熟」「没人吃」「把他们整崩溃」，结合这股基调可知 lovely 是反话，真意是这假期糟透了。态度题要靠语气加上下文判反话。

• Lovely holiday that was!↔It was rather disappointing.反语 Lovely 实指失望
• The worst food I've ever had was in France.↔It was rather disappointing.全篇基调「最难吃」佐证失望

• A)与原文相反It was full of excitement. 说假期「充满兴奋」，恰是被结尾 Lovely holiday that was! 字面骗了；那句是反讽，全篇都在吐槽食物，并无兴奋之意。

  借用原文：Lovely holiday that was!

• B)偷换概念It was really extraordinary. 看似呼应男士那句 it was incredible!，但 incredible 在这里是「难以置信地糟」，而 extraordinary 偏中性甚至褒义，把负面情绪洗成了「了不起」，没答出「失望」这个态度。

  借用原文：it was incredible!

• C)过度推断It was a risky experience. 把「吃到难吃的食物」联想成「有风险的经历」，但男士说的是失望、难吃，从未表达「危险/有风险」，属顺着情节脑补出的态度，原文未提。

What are the speakers mainly talking about?

全程回扣"doing well"这条主线。男方开场就问 Could you give me some idea of what "doing well" means，女方随后反复用 "doing well" means 解释，整段（收入、开支、价格、同行）都挂在"这家店做得好"这条线上——主旨题靠的是这种"反复回到的同一话头"，不是某个单句。

• making almost a quarter of a million pounds↔The business success of the woman's shop.用'具体数字'概括为'经营成功'
• your earnings are rising↔The business success of the woman's shop.'收入上升'是'成功'的下位证据

• C)原词陷阱录音确实说了 we try to keep our expenses as low as we can，C 盗用这个真实片段，但"低成本"只是"做得好"之下的一个侧面，远罩不住全段，是以局部冒充主旨。

  借用原文：we try to keep our expenses as low as we can

• D)原词陷阱录音 your earnings are rising 确有谈收入，D 据此设坑，但"收入"只是衡量"做得好"的一个指标，不能代表整段主旨。

  借用原文：And "doing well" means your earnings are rising.

• A)原词陷阱与同行的关系只在结尾 we are on very good terms with all the shops 一处出现，是收尾的次要话题，A 把这个末尾才提的点拔成主旨，覆盖不了前面大段的收入、成本、价格内容。

  借用原文：we are on very good terms with all the shops

What does the woman say her shop tries to do?

女方亲口的'we try to…'主动表态。答案落在被问者自报的 we try to keep our expenses as low as we can 这句"we try to + 动作"上——细节题问"努力做什么"，就锁定说话人用 try to/make a point of 主动声明的那句，这正是答案信号。

• keep our expenses as low as we can↔Keep down its expenses.'keep…as low as'同义于'keep down'

• B)原词陷阱录音说 since we've moved to this new shop, the expenses have increased greatly, because it's a much bigger shop，只是叙述"搬到更大的店导致开支上升"这个事实，并非说店"努力去扩大规模"，B 把一个背景事实错当成她追求的目标。

  借用原文：because it's a much bigger shop

• A)未提及全段没有任何一句谈 customer service，A 所说的"改善客户服务"在原文里没有落点，属凭生意常识补出来的内容。
• D)未提及原文谈的是商品价格低（见第6段男方 your prices are much lower），从未提到要"提升/升级商品"，D 的内容原文未出现。

What do we learn about the goods sold at the woman's shop?

比较结构 lower…than 直接给出对比。答案句由男方道出 your prices are much lower than the same goods in shops round about，一个清楚的 lower…than 比较——细节题里只要出现"A 比 B 更……"的明确比较，往往就是出题点，听到 much lower than 就该锁定。

• your prices are much lower than the same goods in shops round about↔They are sold at lower prices than in other shops.比较关系逐项对等

• C)未提及全段没有任何关于 delivery 或送货免费的内容，C 的"免费送货"是凭"小店常做送货"的常识补出来的，原文无据。
• B)过度推断原文只说生意好、价格低，并未直接讲商品"很受当地居民欢迎"；B 把"生意好"过度推到"商品受欢迎"，缺一句直接依据。
• D)过度推断录音没有任何"需求旺盛/供不应求"的表述，D 与 B 类似，是从"生意好"硬推出来的属性，没有对应原句。

Why doesn't the woman want to make known their earnings anymore?

因果信号 So 引出做法、缘由在它前面。关键在 He was very unhappy and never as friendly again. So we make a point of never publicizing：一个 So 把"同行不高兴、关系变差"这个缘由和"从此不公开收入"这个做法连起来——目的题就抓这种 because/so 因果信号，理由就在信号词前后这段。

• We were very friendly with all local shopkeepers↔To maintain friendly relationships with other shops.'保住已有的友好'即 maintain friendly relationships
• But we are on very good terms with all the shops↔To maintain friendly relationships with other shops.'on good terms'同义于'friendly relationships'

• C)原词陷阱录音里 put out of business 出现在 None of them have ever complained that we are putting them out of business——是说"没有同行抱怨被我们挤垮"，主体是同行、还带否定，与"她为避免自己被挤垮"完全不沾边，C 既张冠李戴又反了语境。

  借用原文：None of them have ever complained that we are putting them out of business

• B)答非所问不公开收入是为了别刺激同行，与"吸引更多顾客"没有因果关系；录音也没说不公开收入能招来顾客，B 是凭"做生意都想拉客"的常识硬套。
• A)未提及录音说不公开收入是自家从教训里学来的做法（That was a lesson we learned very early on），并非"遵循当地店主的某种习俗"，原文从未提到这是一种行业习俗。

What have Canadian scientists found about some seabirds?

have found 后紧跟的应答句。题干问 found，录音 Canadian scientists have found 原样出现，紧跟其后的 seabirds are picking up dangerous chemicals in the ocean and delivering them to ponds 就是这个发现的具体内容，是承载答案的句子。

• dangerous chemicals in the ocean↔pollutants from the ocean危险化学物=污染物
• delivering them to ponds near where the birds live↔to their nesting sites鸟居住地附近=筑巢地

• A)原词陷阱选项 deliver messages 盗用了录音开头 can be trained to deliver messages and packages 的原词，但那只是引出话题的旧例子，不是加拿大科学家的新发现，答非所问。

  借用原文：can be trained to deliver messages and packages

• C)原词陷阱选项 carry plant seeds 盗用了 carry seeds that cling to them 的原词，同样是开头列举鸟会搬运的旧现象，不是本段讲的新发现，答非所问。

  借用原文：carry seeds that cling to them for the ride

• D)未提及选项说鸟因污染濒临灭绝，录音通篇只讲鸟搬运污染物，从没说鸟自身濒危或灭绝，属无中生有；预读时已警惕的极端词果然落空。

What does the speaker say about the seabirds called fulmars?

预读标记的数字出现。预读时圈定的数字在录音中以 travel some 400 kilometers over the sea to find food 出现，数字一响即锁定为答案句，这正是数字题靠耳朵抓的信号。

• travel some 400 kilometers over the sea to find food↔travel as far as 400 kilometers in search of food找食=in search of food

• A)原词陷阱选项 migrate to the Arctic Circle 借用了录音 north of the Arctic Circle 的 Arctic Circle，但录音说鸟在德文岛筑巢、那里在北极圈以北，从没说鸟夏天迁徙到北极圈，属偷换。

  借用原文：make their nests on Devon Island, north of the Arctic Circle

• B)偷换概念选项 originate from Devon Island 借用 make their nests on Devon Island 的地名，但录音说的是在德文岛筑巢，不是起源于该岛，把筑巢偷换成起源。

  借用原文：make their nests on Devon Island

• D)未提及选项说能在极端天气存活，录音对 fulmars 只讲了筑巢地、觅食距离、粪便去向，从没提抗寒或极端天气能力，属无中生有。

What did scientists previously notice about pollutants in the Arctic?

Previously 与题干时间词对接。录音 Previously, scientists noticed 与题干的 previously, scientists notice 几乎逐词对应，这个先前的时间标记一响就是答案句。

• pollutants arriving in the Arctic with the wind↔carried by the wind随风而来=被风携带

• B)未提及选项说污染物变得更毒，录音 carry dangerous chemicals 只说化学物危险，从没说先前注意到它们变得更毒，属无中生有的程度夸张。
• C)与原文相反选项说比大陆上少，录音第 5 段说的是离鸟群近的池塘污染物远多于受影响小的池塘，既是当前研究而非先前，比较对象与方向也都不对。

  借用原文：there were far more pollutants than in ponds less affected

• D)未提及选项说污染物毒倒了一些 fulmars，录音从没说鸟自己中毒，只说鸟把化学物带到池塘、化学物会对人造成问题，属无中生有并张冠李戴到鸟身上。

What does the speaker warn about at the end of the talk?

转折 but 后落出真正告诫。结尾 The birds don't mean to cause harm, but the chemicals they carry can cause major problems 中，转折词 but 之后才是真意：鸟带的化学物会给附近的人惹大麻烦，这是答案信号所在。

• the chemicals they carry can cause major problems↔The harm Arctic seabirds may cause to humans.化学物惹大麻烦=鸟对人的伤害
• People who live, hunt, or fish near bird colonies need to be careful↔to humans附近的人=humans

• A)与原文相反选项说人对北极海鸟的威胁，方向是人害鸟，而结尾 the chemicals they carry can cause major problems 说的是鸟（携带的化学物）害人，方向正好相反。

  借用原文：The birds don't mean to cause harm, but the chemicals they carry can cause major problems

• B)未提及选项说海鸟栖息地在减少，录音只讲鸟在德文岛筑巢及污染问题，从没说栖息地或鸟群数量减少，属无中生有。
• D)未提及选项说气候变化对海鸟的影响，录音通篇讲化学污染物的搬运，从未提到气候变化，属无中生有；预读时已警惕这个新引入的气候因素，果然没出现。

What does the speaker say about the risk of dying for American centenarians in recent years?

时间状语 in recent years 顺听对上题干。题干问的 in recent years 与原文开头 In recent years 完全同框，紧跟其后的 has decreased 就是答案落点；篇章题目多与播报同序，开头第一句正对第一题。

• the death rate among American centenarians…has decreased↔It has decreasedIt 回指 death rate，decreased 原义保留

• B)未提及It has been exaggerated 说死亡风险"被夸大"，原文通篇只讲数字升降，从未说任何风险被夸大，属凭空添加。
• C)偷换概念It has become better understood 谈的是"被更好地理解"，原文谈的是死亡率的量在变，没说人们对它的理解程度变了，话题被悄悄换掉。
• D)与原文相反It has remained basically the same 说基本没变，而原文明说 has decreased 并给出两位数降幅，方向正好相反。

  借用原文：has decreased, dropping 14 percent for women and 20 percent for men

What does the speaker say about Alzheimer's disease?

转折 But + 数据翻倍 + 结果状语。But by 2014 的转折把视线从2000年的排名拉到2014年的变化，紧接 had more than doubled 给出翻倍数据，再由 making the progressive brain disease the second leading cause of death 点出新排名——转折后才是真意所在。

• the second leading cause of death for centenarians↔It is now the second leading cause of death for centenarians几乎原句，加 now 对应 by 2014
• had more than doubled↔It is now the second leading cause of death翻倍导致升至第二，因果归并

• A)未提及It develops more easily in centenarians not actively engaged 里的 not actively engaged（不活跃）原文根本没提；原文只说百岁老人是 physically fit enough to survive over 100 years（身体硬朗），与"不活跃"恰相反，是把别处概念安到此处。
• C)未提及It has had no effective cure so far 说至今无有效疗法，原文只讲它的死亡率和排名变化，从未谈及有没有疗法，是绝对化的凭空添加。
• D)未提及It calls for more intensive research 说该病需更多深入研究，原文给的是死亡率数据和原因推测，没有任何"呼吁研究"的表述。

What is characteristic of people who live up to 100 years and beyond?

总结提示语 In other words 引出点题句。In other words 是典型的换言归纳信号，它后面那句 their minds give out before their bodies do 是对前文的提炼，正是文章对百岁老人特征的结论。

• their minds give out before their bodies do↔Their minds fall before their bodies dogive out = fall，结构完全平行

• A)原词陷阱They care more about their physical health 借了原文 physically fit 的 physical 来诱选，但原文说的是他们身体硬朗这一客观事实，从没说他们"更在意身体健康"，主观态度是凭空加的。

  借用原文：People physically fit enough to survive over 100 years

• B)过度推断Their quality of life deteriorates rapidly 里的 rapidly（迅速恶化）原文并未说；原文只说他们最终会败给影响心智的疾病，没量化恶化速度，是把结论推过了头。
• D)未提及They cherish their life more than ever 说他们比以往更珍惜生命，原文谈的是心智与身体的衰退先后，完全没涉及他们对生命的态度。

What does the speaker say about most of the experiments mentioned in his talk?

题干原词 most of the experiments 现身处即答案句。讲者亲口说出 most of the experiments I'm going to talk about，与题干 the experiments 直接对应，这句正是承载答案的句子；其后 focused more on attraction than love 就是对实验特点的正面交代。

• most of the experiments I'm going to talk about are really focused more on attraction than love↔They are focused more on attraction than love.原句压缩，主语换代词

• B)原词陷阱录音确有 a former colleague, Robert Sternberg 和 here on our faculty at Yale，但这是介绍提出理论的那位学者的背景，不是说 "实验是他在 Yale 做的"；选项把 "学者在 Yale" 偷换成 "实验由 Yale 同事做"，听到 Yale 就选会中招。

  借用原文：a former colleague, Robert Sternberg, who is now the dean at Tufts University but was here on our faculty at Yale

• C)原词陷阱nearly thirty years 在原文修饰 Sternberg "在 Yale 任教近三十年"，与实验进行了多久毫无关系；选项把这个时长扣到 the experiments "做了三十年" 头上，是典型听到数字就误选。

  借用原文：was here on our faculty at Yale for nearly thirty years

• D)张冠李戴录音中 a theory of love 是 Sternberg 提出的爱情理论，讲者并未说那些实验 "构成其理论的基础"；选项盗用 theory of love 字样，却让实验充当理论根基，与原文不符。

  借用原文：he has a theory of love that argues that it's made up of three components

What does Robert Sternberg argue about love?

主张标记 argue + 否定条件强判断句。句首 Sternberg would argue 是明确的 "主张" 信号，正对题干 argue；其后 it's not love if you don't have some desire to maintain the relationship 是 "否定+条件" 的强判断，正是他的核心论点所在。

• it's not love if you don't have some desire to maintain the relationship↔It is not love if you don't wish to maintain the relationship.wish=have some desire，句式同构

• A)偷换概念录音说 Sternberg argues that this is a required component（passion 是爱的必需成分），并没说 "没有 passion 关系就不能持久"；选项 cannot last long if no passion 把 "是构成要素之一" 偷换成 "决定关系能否长久"，听到 passion 就选会错。

  借用原文：Sternberg argues that this is a required component of a love relationship

• B)与原文相反原文讲三要素 you don't have love if you don't have all three，intimacy 是缺一不可的成分；选项 essential but not absolutely indispensable 给 intimacy 留了 "可有可无" 的口子，与 "三者缺一不可" 直接矛盾。

  借用原文：He argued that you don't have love if you don't have all three of these elements

• D)未提及录音确说 Passion is the drive that leads to romance，选项借了 romance 一词；但 "romance 离不开 mutual understanding" 在原文中根本没有讲过，是凭空添加的断言。

  借用原文：Passion is the drive that leads to romance

What question does the speaker think is interesting about Sternberg's three elements of love?

态度标记 what's interesting 引出的追问。what's interesting about the theory is 是讲者亲口给出的 "有意思" 信号，正对题干 interesting；其后 what do you have if you only have one out of three or two out of three 就是他认为有意思的那个问题——缺了部分要素时还剩下什么。

• what do you have if you only have one out of three or two out of three↔How the relationship is to be defined if any one is missing."只有一个/两个"="缺了某个"，"剩下什么"="如何定义"

• A)未提及讲者只说三要素 "缺一就不是爱"，三者地位并列，从未讨论 most important（哪个最重要）；最高级是凭空添加的比较，原文没有这层意思。
• B)原词陷阱录音三要素含 decision/commitment，commitment 是真念过的词；但讲者觉得有意思的是 "缺其一或其二（泛指）" 时关系算什么，并非单问 "缺 commitment 算不算真爱"。选项把泛指的缺失窄化成只缺 commitment 一项，范围偏了。

  借用原文：The third element of love in Sternberg's theory is what he calls decision/commitment

• C)答非所问讲者的追问是缺项后 "你拥有的是什么、它有何不同"，关注的是 "变成哪种关系"，并非 When the absence… doesn't affect the relationship（什么时候缺一个也不影响关系）；原文从未说缺要素 "不影响"，反而强调缺了就不是爱。

  借用原文：What do you have and how is it different if you have a different two out of three?

What does the speaker mainly talk about?

开头点题句 talking about。答案句的信号是开头的点题宣告 Today we are going to be talking about becoming a social worker.，紧接 Social work is the helping profession. 给社工下定义——讲座开篇的"今天要讲X"+"X 是…"正是主旨所在。

• Social work is the helping profession.↔Social work as a profession.the helping profession 概括为 a profession

• B)未提及原文确实念到 the rich history of social work，但那是 throughout this series you will learn 里"系列后续会涉及"的诸多内容之一，不是本段主旨；选项 The history of social work. 盗用 history 这个原词以偏概全。

  借用原文：the rich history of social work

• C)原词陷阱原文提到社工 have a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD in Social Work，选项 Academic degrees required of social work applicants. 借"degree"原词把这一处细节拔高成主旨，属以偏概全。

  借用原文：a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD in Social Work

• D)原词陷阱原文结尾才说 Our mission is to promote, protect, and advance the social work profession.，选项 The aim of the National Association of Social Workers. 盗用 National Association 这个高频专名，把结尾一句话的协会宗旨当成整篇主旨，仍是以偏概全。

  借用原文：The National Association of Social Workers

What do social workers mainly do?

使命定义句 primary mission。答案句的信号是 Its primary mission is to enhance human well-being 里的 primary mission（首要使命）——"主要做什么"的正面定义句，正落在这种"使命是…"的判断句上。

• enhance human well-being↔help enhance the well-beingwell-being 近乎原词对应
• those who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty↔the underprivileged三类弱势人群上提为 underprivileged

• A)偷换概念原文说社工 focus on the person and environment、应对影响处境的外部因素，选项 They try to change people's social behavior. 借"person""environment"的语境编出"改变人的社会行为"，原文从未说改变 behavior，是偷换概念。

  借用原文：we focus on the person and environment

• C)原词陷阱原文 focus on the person and environment 里的 environment 指"人所处的（社会）环境"，选项 They raise people's awareness of the environment. 盗用 environment 把它曲解成"自然环境/环保意识"，是熟词僻义被反向利用的偷换。

  借用原文：the person and environment

• D)原词陷阱原文确说 we create opportunity for assessment and intervention（为评估与干预创造机会），选项 They create a lot of opportunities for the unemployed. 盗用 create opportunity 这个原词，却把受益对象偷换成 the unemployed（失业者），原文从没提失业者。

  借用原文：we create opportunity for assessment and intervention

What do professional social workers have in common, according to the speaker?

全称句 we all either…。答案句的信号是 we all either have a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD in Social Work 里的 we all——这正是预读盯住的全称表述，"全都拥有社工学位"就是共同点。

• we all either have a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD in Social Work↔They all have an academic degree in social work三种学位概括为 an academic degree

• A)与原文相反原文只说 There are more clinically trained social workers than clinically trained psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychiatric nurses combined.——讲的是"临床训练的社工"人数多，并未说"所有社工都受过临床训练"；选项 They have all received strict clinical training. 盗用 clinical training 原词，再硬加一个 all，与原文不符。

  借用原文：There are more clinically trained social workers than clinically trained psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychiatric nurses combined.

• C)原词陷阱原文 The National Association of Social Workers represents nearly 145,000 social workers，而全国有 more than 600,000 professional social workers——协会只代表其中一部分，远非全体；选项 They are all members of the National Association. 盗用高频专名再加 all，与数字明显矛盾。

  借用原文：The National Association of Social Workers represents nearly 145,000 social workers

• D)原词陷阱原文里 how you can make a difference by becoming a social worker 是对听众的鼓励"你能带来改变"，不是陈述"所有社工都已做出改变"这一共同属性；选项 They have all made a difference through their work. 盗用 make a difference 原词，答非所问。

  借用原文：how you can make a difference by becoming a social worker

What is Mel Wilson going to talk about in the series?

人名后紧跟 will tell you about。答案句的信号是人名 Mel 后紧跟 Mel will tell you about the range of options——"某人 will tell you about…"正是该人负责话题的标志，挨着 Mel 的就是他要讲的。

• the range of options you have once you get your social work degree↔job optionsrange of options 概括为 job options
• the high standards of responsibility that social workers must adhere to↔responsibilitiesresponsibility 近乎原词对应

• A)未提及原文从未说 Mel 要讲社工的社会地位提升，选项 The promotion of social workers' social status. 里的"social status"原文未提；它或借 promote, protect, and advance the social work profession 的 promote 引人联想，但 promote profession 不等于 promote social status。

  借用原文：promote, protect, and advance the social work profession

• B)张冠李戴原文里与"流程/步骤"相关的是 Stacy 讲 the step-by-step process of becoming a social worker，与培训沾边的话题不归 Mel；选项 The importance of training for social workers. 把不属于 Mel 的话题安到他头上，且"training 的重要性"原文也未强调。

  借用原文：Stacy is going to walk you through the step-by-step process of becoming a social worker

• C)原词陷阱原文里 needs 出现在第一段 help meet the basic needs of all people，讲的是社工总体职责，并非 Mel 将讲的内容；选项 Ways for social workers to meet people's needs. 盗用 needs 原词，张冠李戴到 Mel 头上。

  借用原文：help meet the basic needs of all people

What is the aim of Michelle Obama's campaign?

which 定语从句直陈宗旨。答案信号是计划名后紧跟的定语从句 which fights childhood obesity——录音介绍一个 campaign 后立刻用 which 说明它"做什么、为什么"，这就是目的说明句，一听到"计划名 + which + 动词"就锁定。

• which fights childhood obesity↔To fight childhood obesity.从句转不定式表目的

• C)原词陷阱C To encourage kids to play more sports. 盗用了录音 encouraging youngsters to become more physically active 里的"鼓励/更多运动"之意，听着很对。但"鼓励多运动"在原文里只是"对抗肥胖"的手段（by encouraging…），不是计划的最终目的；题问 aim，手段当目的就是答非所问。

  借用原文：by encouraging youngsters to become more physically active

• B)未提及B To help disadvantaged kids. 里的"弱势儿童"录音通篇没有出现，计划针对的是"所有儿童的肥胖"，不是"弱势群体"。属凭"公益计划=帮弱势"的常识臆造，文本无据。
• D)张冠李戴D To urge kids to follow their role models. 里的 role models 确实是录音的关键词，但"名人是榜样"是整篇讨论的背景，不是 "Let's Move!" 计划的目的；该计划目的是对抗肥胖，把全篇话题安到这个计划头上即张冠李戴。

  借用原文：celebrity role models

What does research find about advertisements featuring professional athletes?

researchers reported 引出结论。答案信号是 the researchers reported that——这是研究方正式给出结论的标志句，题问 research find，这句就是直接应答；其后的 children…more…than adults 即发现内容。

• children ages 12 to 17 saw more athlete-endorsed food and beverage brand commercials than adults↔They impress kids more than they do adults.看得更多改写为印象更深

• B)原词陷阱B They are most effective when appearing on TV. 抓住了录音 on TV, radio, in print and online 里念到的 TV，让人误以为"电视最有效"。但原文只是并列罗列广告出现的各种渠道，从没说哪个渠道"最有效"，B 凭空加了"most effective"和"单挑 TV"。

  借用原文：on TV, radio, in print and online

• A)原词陷阱A They best boost product sales when put online. 同样借了 online 这个真念到的渠道词，再编出"放网上最能促进销量"。录音只说广告在网上等渠道"曝光大"，全篇没讲过"销量"，更没说网上最促销，属添油加醋。

  借用原文：online

• C)原词陷阱C They are becoming more and more prevalent. 里的 prevalent 确实是录音 how prevalent these endorsements are 念到的词，极诱人。但原文只是说研究"量化了这些代言在儿童环境中有多普遍"，是陈述"普遍程度"，并没有说"越来越（more and more）"这个"上升趋势"；C 把"普遍"偷换成"日益普遍"，且这不是本题问的"研究发现"的落点。

  借用原文：how prevalent these endorsements are in the children's environment

What does the speaker think kids' idols should do?

结尾建议句 it's in their best interest。答案信号是末段的 it's in their best interest if their idols are consistent——录音收尾用"最符合孩子利益的是……"这种价值判断句给出主张，正是说话人 think 的落点；紧接的 Consistent messaging of positive behaviors 把主张说得更具体。

• Consistent messaging of positive behaviors↔Message positive behaviors at all times.名词化转祈使且 consistent=at all times

• D)原词陷阱D Pay attention to their image before children.（在孩子面前注意形象）借了全篇反复的 children 一词，听着也"正面"。但录音的主张是"言行一致地传递正面行为（consistent）"，从没说偶像该"注意形象/image"——image 是原文没有的概念，是用常识"名人要注意形象"臆造的。

  借用原文：If children are turning to athletes as role models

• A)张冠李戴A Always place kids' interest first. 抓住了录音 it's in their best interest 里的 interest，像是"把孩子利益放首位"。但原文的 best interest 是用来说"偶像一致才最符合孩子利益"，主张是"保持一致"，不是叫偶像"把孩子利益放第一"；把句中一个词拎出来当主张即张冠李戴。

  借用原文：it's in their best interest if their idols are consistent

• B)偷换概念B Do what they advocate in public.（公开场合言行一致）和正解 C 很近，最易误选。但原文要求的是 consistent——任何时候都一致（对应 C 的 at all times），B 把它缩小成"只在公开场合"言行一致，限定范围被偷偷改小，且 in public 原文未提。

  借用原文：it's in their best interest if their idols are consistent