2022年12月·第1套 英语六级听力真题原文与答案解析

What does the woman say about her dissertation?

被问者的直接应答。男生先问 How's your dissertation going，女生张口第一句 I haven't even started writing mine yet 就是对提问的直接应答，对话题的答案就落在被问者这第一反应上。

• I haven't even started writing mine yet↔She hasn't started writing it.去掉 even 的同义压缩

• B)偷换概念She hasn't decided on a topic. 听着也像『没进展』，但女生说的是还没开始写，topic 在后文 I'm still researching the topic 里指『还在查资料』，并非『没定下题目』，属偷换概念。

  借用原文：I'm still researching the topic

• C)张冠李戴She is proofreading the first draft. 里 proofreading the first draft 确在录音中出现，但说这话的是男生 I'm proofreading my first draft，不是女生，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：I'm proofreading my first draft

• D)未提及She is working on the references. 说她在弄参考文献，意味着正文已近完成，与她『还没动笔』完全矛盾，录音里也没说她在做文献，属未提及。

What does the man say about his professor?

经过句里的求助动作。男生回顾自己怎么做研究，关键在 I started by talking to my professor about where to look for information——他教授给的正是『去哪找资料』的指点，这句叙述里藏着教授的作为。

• talking to my professor about where to look for information↔He offered the man advice on resource hunting把『聊去哪找资料』概括为『给找资料建议』

• A)原词陷阱He lent many books to the man for reference. 里 books 确在录音出现，但 I found books in the library 是男生自己在图书馆找到的书，不是教授借给他的，原词陷阱。

  借用原文：I found books in the library

• C)原词陷阱He published a lot in a number of reputable journals. 用了原词 reputable journal，但 a lot of reputable journal articles on the Internet 说的是男生在网上找到这些文章来读，而非教授在期刊上发表论文，原词陷阱兼无中生有。

  借用原文：a lot of reputable journal articles on the Internet

• D)未提及He told the man to be selective when using e-resources. 说教授叮嘱『用电子资源要有选择』，但录音里教授只指点了去哪找，从未提『要挑着用』，selective 是未提及。

What does the woman say about her professor?

引述动词 warn 引出原话。女生用 my professor did warn me at the beginning that I might not be able to find enough material 转述教授当初的警告，引述动词 warn 后面那句就是教授的态度，是答案句。

• warn me at the beginning that I might not be able to find enough material↔He didn't think her dissertation topic viable.『找不到材料』即『选题不可行』

• B)张冠李戴He wasn't interested in her dissertation topic. 把 interested 安在教授身上，但录音里 I was so interested in the topic 说有兴趣的是女生自己，教授只是警告找不到料，张冠李戴又偷换。

  借用原文：I was so interested in the topic

• C)未提及He didn't want her to rush through her dissertation. 说教授不想她赶工，但教授只警告材料不够，从没说过快慢、赶不赶的事，未提及。
• D)原词陷阱He wasn't specific about the length of her dissertation. 提到 length，录音里 length 出现在 my department's minimum length is 70 pages，那是系里的规定，与教授说没说清篇幅无关，原词陷阱。

  借用原文：my department's minimum length is 70 pages

What do we learn the woman will do to complete her dissertation?

结尾采纳建议的应答。男生上一句建议 You could find more material if you made the topic broader，女生末句 Broadening the topic is a great idea 当即采纳，结尾这句『接受建议』就是答案句。

• Broadening the topic is a great idea↔Follow the man's advice.采纳男生提议=照他建议办

• A)原词陷阱Change her research methodology. 沾了男生那句 Maybe the problem is the way you're doing your research，但女生最终决定的是扩大题目，并没说要换研究方法，原词陷阱。

  借用原文：Maybe the problem is the way you're doing your research

• B)与原文相反Narrow down her dissertation topic. 与女生的决定正好相反——男生说题目 That's pretty narrow，建议 made the topic broader，女生要做的是 broaden（扩大）而非 narrow（缩小），与原文相反。

  借用原文：That's pretty narrow

• C)原词陷阱Consult her professor more. 里 professor 全程反复出现，诱人选；但女生采纳的是男生当下的建议，并未表示要再去多问教授，原词陷阱。

  借用原文：our professors are here to guide us

What does the woman say about the man in her introduction?

主持人介绍嘉宾的成就陈述句。答案信号是主持人介绍环节里铺陈嘉宾业绩的那句 your four books have sold a total of seven million copies worldwide——访谈开场的 "夸业绩" 句往往就是 introduction 题的答案句。

• sold a total of seven million copies worldwide↔His books sell well worldwide"全球卖出七百万册" 概括为 "全球畅销"

• A)原词陷阱录音说 translated into 12 different languages(译成 12 种语言)，A 却说 He has translated 12 books.(翻译了 12 本书)——盗用了原文数字 12，却把对象从 "语言" 换成 "书"，且作者是 "被翻译" 不是 "去翻译"，听到 12 就选必中招。

  借用原文：translated into 12 different languages

• B)未提及录音介绍他是 a respected writer 和写科学的 celebrity authors，从没说他是 a well-known nutritionist.(知名营养师)。营养师是顺着 "减肥饮食" 话题脑补出来的，原文未提及。
• D)原词陷阱录音是 your four books have sold a total of seven million copies(四本书合计七百万册)，D 说 His latest book sold a million copies.(最新一本卖了一百万册)——盗用 "百万册级销量" 的语感，却把 "四本合计七百万" 偷换成 "单本一百万"，数字与范围全错。

  借用原文：your four books have sold a total of seven million copies

What has motivated the man to write his books?

因果连接词 because 引出原因。答案信号是显性因果词 because：people read my books because more than 60% of Americans are overweight，because 后面那句现象即为写书/读书的动机。

• more than 60% of Americans are overweight, or obese↔The fact that over half of Americans are overweight"超 60%" 等价于 "过半"

• A)未提及The desire of Americans to try exotic cuisines.(想尝异国菜)在整段对话里没有任何对应，纯属话题跑偏的捏造，与减肥饮食主线无关。
• B)未提及The demand for information about food safety.(对食品安全信息的需求)听上去与饮食沾边，但录音给的动机是 "超重"，从未谈 food safety，属顺着话题脑补的未提及项。
• D)与原文相反录音里 "科学难懂" 是被作者 make difficult science easy for laymen to understand 克服的难点、是卖点，而非写书动机；D 却把 science books are difficult to read. 说成动机，盗用了 "difficult science" 的字眼却把作用讲反了。

  借用原文：make difficult science easy for laymen to understand

Who does the man say his last book was mainly written for?

限定词 last + 受众句，并与 "this time" 对照。答案信号是 My last book was written primarily for the medical community 这句明确的 "上一本 written for 谁"，紧接的 But this time 形成 "上一本 vs 这一本" 对照，提醒要选 last 对应的那一群。

• My last book was written primarily for the medical community↔The medical community受众原词直接对应

• A)张冠李戴The general public. 对应的是 this time, I want to help ordinary people——那是 "这一本(新书)" 的受众。把 this time 的受众安到 last book 头上，正是没分清两本书的张冠李戴。

  借用原文：this time, I want to help ordinary people take control of their weight

• B)原词陷阱Those who are overweight. 借了通篇出现的 overweight 一词，但录音从没说哪本书是 "为超重者" 而写；它只是话题词，不是 last book 的受众。

  借用原文：more than 60% of Americans are overweight

• C)答非所问Those who want to lose weight. 贴合全场减肥主题、最顺耳，但录音说 last book 是写给 medical community 的；"想减肥的人" 从未被点名为某本书的受众，是借主题诱选。

What does the man recommend people do?

主张句 I argue + 否定 I don't advocate 立反差。答案信号是主张句 I argue that every person needs to consider their metabolism and eat what suits their body's needs，再以 I don't advocate one single diet 否定 "单一食谱"——一立一否，强调的正是 "因人而异"。

• every person needs to consider their metabolism and eat what suits their body's needs↔Follow a personalized diet"按各自身体需求吃" 概括为 "个性化饮食"
• I don't advocate one single diet↔Follow a personalized diet"不主张单一食谱" 反面印证 "个性化"

• A)未提及Switch to a vegetarian diet.(改吃素)在对话里没有依据；录音末尾虽提到多吃蔬果，但那是补充建议，从没让人 "改成素食"，属未提及的绝对化主张。
• C)原词陷阱Adhere to doctors' advice. 借了前文 the medical community 留下的 "医学" 印象，但作者建议的是按自身代谢来，从没让普通人 "遵医嘱"，是盗用医学语感的诱选。

  借用原文：My last book was written primarily for the medical community

• D)与原文相反录音说 Some people should eat more carbohydrates than others(有些人该比别人多吃碳水)，是 "碳水因人而异"；D 却笼统说 Cut carbohydrate intake.(减少碳水)，盗用 carbohydrate 一词，却把 "看人而定" 讲成了 "一律削减"，方向相反。

  借用原文：Some people should eat more carbohydrates than others

What did researchers discover about rats placed briefly in a stressful situation?

discovered 后接发现内容。答案句由 Researchers discovered that 引出，研究动词 discovered 后面紧跟的就是题干要的发现，是天然的答案信号；同时 doubled the growth of new brain cells 给出明确的量化结果，更确认这就是落点。

• doubled the growth of new brain cells↔The growth of their new brain cells doubled.主被动语序调换

• A)偷换概念A 说 rate of their growth increased dramatically（成长速率剧增），但录音说的是生长翻倍（数量翻番），讲的是结果量而非速率；它盗用了原文 growth 一词，却把翻倍偷换成速率剧增，答非所问。

  借用原文：doubled the growth of new brain cells

• C)未提及C 说大鼠出现 signs of depression（抑郁迹象），但录音通篇讲的是适度压力的好处，从未提大鼠抑郁，属于无中生有。
• D)未提及D 说大鼠变得 irritated and restless（烦躁不安），录音只说短暂压力让脑细胞翻倍、记忆变好，没说大鼠情绪烦躁，是凭压力等于负面的常识硬加的，未提及。

Why do people tend to have clear memories of dangerous situations they have encountered?

because 引出真原因。答案句的核心信号是 because，题干问 Why，录音里紧跟 because 后的 can avoid them in the future 正是要的原因——因果连词后面就是答案落点。

• can avoid them in the future↔To avoid them in the future.几乎原义照搬

• B)未提及B 说为了 warn others against them（警告别人提防），录音只说记住是为了自己将来躲开，从未提及把危险告诉他人，属未提及。
• C)未提及C 说为了 make good sense of them（弄懂它们），录音讲的目的是 avoid（躲开）而非理解其含义，方向不符，原文无此说法。
• D)未提及D 说为了 reflect on their causes（反思其成因），录音从没提反思危险的起因，只说记住以便将来躲开，是凭常识硬推的目的，未提及。

What do scientists believe chronic stress can do?

concede 后的让步内容。答案句出现题干关键词 chronic stress，并由 Scientists concede that 引出科学家的让步看法；问 chronic 就只认带 chronic 的这句，其后的 make you more prone to illness 即答案。

• make you more prone to illness↔Make people more susceptible to illness.近义词替换

• A)张冠李戴A 说产生 surprising healing effect（惊人疗愈效果），录音里令人意外的好处是说短期压力 provide some protection against getting sick，而题干问的是 chronic（长期）；A 张冠李戴，把短期压力的好处安到了长期压力头上。

  借用原文：short periods of stress can actually provide some protection against getting sick

• B)与原文相反B 说 Weaken one's immunity in the long run（长期削弱免疫力），录音讲免疫只说短期压力 increases your immune functioning（增强免疫），从没说长期压力削弱免疫；B 反了方向又借用 long run 来唬人。

  借用原文：increases your immune functioning

• D)偷换概念D 说 protection against mental illnesses（防护精神疾病），录音说的是短期压力 provide some protection against getting sick（防普通生病），既错把长期当短期，又把笼统的生病偷换成 mental illnesses（精神疾病）。

  借用原文：provide some protection against getting sick

What does the speaker say is a common problem with managers?

概括管理者通病的陈述句。这句不是靠某个转折词跳出来，而是全篇反复落到同一点：管理者把精力压在邮箱上而牺牲更重要的事。many sacrifice the latter 与 prioritize email management over people management 互相印证，共同指向"花太多时间在邮件上"这个通病。

• Daily email demands have a negative impact on their goal progress↔Spending too much time handling email"邮件占用精力"换说成"花太多时间处理邮件"

• A)偷换概念录音说的是管理者把邮件管理置于人员管理之上 prioritize email management over people management，置于上面的是"邮件"而非"自身利益"；A 把 over...staff 的句式留下，却换成 own interests，是偷换。

  借用原文：prioritize email management over people management

• B)原词陷阱录音强调的是被"邮件"困住，未说被泛泛的"日常事务（daily routines）"压垮；B 借了 day-to-day 的感觉 day-to-day email，却把焦点从"邮件"扩大成"日常琐事"，范围被放大。

  借用原文：day-to-day email

• C)过度推断录音只说管理者沉迷邮箱、忽视员工 prevents them from dealing with their employees，是"没空管"，并未说他们"缺乏与员工共情的能力（relate to staff）"；从"没空管"推到"没能力"是多走了一步。

  借用原文：prevents them from dealing with their employees

What may happen when managers ignore minor problems?

until 之后才是结果落点。因果信号在 until unfortunately, they inevitably transform into a major problem or crisis：起初只是 mild problems，until 之后才转成 major problem。听这类题不能停在"小问题"那半句，落点在 until / transform into 之后的结果。

• transform into a major problem or crisis↔Major problems may result"演变成重大问题"="重大问题随之产生"

• A)张冠李戴录音前文确实提到 leadership skills 会下降 diminished leadership skills，但那是讲邮件焦虑的背景，不是"忽视小问题"这一动作的后果；A 把别处出现的 leadership 搬来当本题结果，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：diminished leadership skills

• B)过度推断录音最重只说到 major problem or crisis（重大问题或危机），并未说严重到"公司破产"；B 把"危机"夸大为"破产"，超出录音程度。
• C)与原文相反录音用 inevitably transform（不可避免地演变）强调这是必然结果，而 C 说"unexpected events（意外事件）"，恰与"不可避免"相反。

  借用原文：they inevitably transform

What are leaders expected to do in pursuing their strategic goals?

are expected to + 限定语 in pursuit of strategic goals。信号是 expected to motivate and inspire their team in pursuit of longer-term strategic goals：be expected to 直接给出"被期望做的事"，而题干限定"追求战略目标时"，正好对应 in pursuit of...strategic goals 这一半，落点就在 motivate and inspire。

• motivate and inspire their team in pursuit of longer-term strategic goals↔Motivate and inspire their team原句动作原样保留

• A)答非所问录音里"监督"出现在 to monitor their daily output，这属于后半句"志向稍低、更务实"的日常事务，而非题干所问的"追求战略目标"那部分；A 借 monitor 的意思，却挂错了半句。

  借用原文：to monitor their daily output

• C)原词陷阱录音 P4 说的是管理者"牺牲更重要的事" many sacrifice the latter，并不是"牺牲眼前目标"，且那是讲管理者的毛病、不是"被期望做的事"；C 把 sacrifice 一词搬来制造熟悉感。

  借用原文：many sacrifice the latter

• D)过度推断录音只说战略目标是 longer-term（更长远）longer-term strategic goals，并未要求领导"在整体规划上更有野心"；D 把"长远"擅自升级成"更大野心的规划"。

  借用原文：longer-term strategic goals

How can a manager best avoid being distracted by email?

The solution is 给总方案。信号是 The solution is cultivating self-control：The solution is 直接抛出总的解决办法。题干带 best，要的正是这条根本方案，而其后的 making space in your diary、setting a timer 等都只是它名下的"具体小做法"，不是总解。

• The solution is cultivating self-control↔Cultivate self-control总方案原样对应

• B)原词陷阱录音确实念到 check, filter and respond to emails 里有 filter，但那是描述邮件耗费精力，不是给的解决建议；filter 一词制造了熟悉感，却答非"best 的总办法"。

  借用原文：check, filter and respond to emails

• C)未提及录音的具体建议是"在日程里划出专门查邮件的时段" making space in your diary for the only periods during which you'll be checking emails，并没有说"只在下班后回复"；C 是凭常识臆造的做法。
• D)答非所问录音建议是"划定专门时段查"与"设定时器" setting a timer for yourself so you don't become distracted，更接近 D 的味道，但 D 仍只是 self-control 名下的具体操作；题干带 best，要的是总方案 A 而非这条小招。

  借用原文：making space in your diary for the only periods during which you'll be checking emails

What does the speaker say a team of marketing professors has studied?

题干原词 studied 在原文直接出现。录音 a team of marketing professors has studied the importance of the visual aspect of food 与题干同用 studied，是对研究对象的直接交代，定位信号明确，无需转折或推断。

• the importance of the visual aspect of food↔The importance of the appearance of food.visual aspect 同义改写为 appearance

• A)原词陷阱选项把录音多次提到的 healthy 拼成 increasing healthy food supply，但录音研究的是外观对选择的影响，从未谈增加健康食品的供给量，属听到 healthy 就想选的原词陷阱。

  借用原文：promote healthy food choices

• B)原词陷阱选项借用录音里的 marketing 拼成 improve marketing research，但讲者说的是营销学者拿来研究外观，而非研究如何改进市场调研本身，属答非所问。

  借用原文：a team of marketing professors

• C)原词陷阱录音确实在 seeing an appealing photograph of a hamburger in an advertisement 提到广告，但那是用来举例说明外观如何起作用，不是这组学者研究的对象；选项把举例细节当成研究主题，属原词陷阱。

  借用原文：an appealing photograph of a hamburger in an advertisement

How have medical professionals tried to fight obesity?

主体词 medical professionals 领出做法句。录音 medical professionals have tried to fight the obesity epidemic by focusing on the nutrients 主体与题干完全一致，by focusing on 直接给出做法，是该主体名下的答案句信号。

• by focusing on the nutrients found in different foods↔By focusing on the nutrients in different foods.几乎原句对应仅省略 found

• B)未提及选项 By emphasizing the diversity of food. 的 diversity 在录音里从未出现，医学专家强调的是营养成分而非食物多样性，属无中生有。
• C)张冠李戴强调美感 By stressing pleasing aesthetics of food. 确是录音里的做法，但那是营销学者的主张，不是医学专家的做法；选项把营销学者的招安到医学专家头上，属张冠李戴。

  借用原文：the combination of pleasing aesthetics

• D)原词陷阱选项 By winning the support of marketing professors. 借用录音里的 marketing professors，但录音从没说医学专家去争取营销教授的支持，二者只是讲座中并列对比的两方，属原词陷阱。

  借用原文：a team of marketing professors

What can other companies learn from the example of the carrot promotion campaign?

结尾外推句 could+similar 给出启示。录音结尾 other companies could bolster sales of healthy foods with similar ads 用 could 与 similar 把胡萝卜案例外推到其他公司，正是题干所问的启示落点。

• bolster sales of healthy foods with similar ads, depicting their products as attractive↔They can boost sales of healthy foods by making them visually appealing.bolster=boost、attractive=visually appealing

• A)与原文相反选项 They can attract customers with the healthy qualities of their products. 借用录音 didn't emphasize the carrots' healthy qualities 的原词，但录音明说该案例恰恰没强调健康属性，选项把否定说成肯定，属与原文相反。

  借用原文：The campaign didn't emphasize the carrots' healthy qualities

• C)原词陷阱选项 They can turn to marketing professors for advice. 借用录音里的 marketing professors，但讲者说的是公司可用类似广告，从没说让公司去求助营销教授，属原词陷阱。

  借用原文：a team of marketing professors

• D)偷换概念选项 They can rely on advertising for sales promotion. 借用录音的 ads，但录音强调的是靠把产品拍得有吸引力、令人愉悦的广告，而非泛泛依赖广告；选项丢掉视觉吸引这一关键限定，属偷换概念。

  借用原文：bolster sales of healthy foods with similar ads, depicting their products as attractive and a source of pleasure

What does the speaker say about the cleaning products industry in recent years?

时间标志 in recent years + 转折 however。In recent years, however 同时给出题干要的时间窗和一个转折信号——however 把话锋从前句"大公司主导"转向"小企业崛起"，转折之后才是答案落点。

• a surge in the number of small businesses and companies offering more environment-friendly cleaning products↔more small businesses offering environment-friendly productsa surge in the number of = more 的同义概括

• A)原词陷阱录音确实念了 surge，但原文是 a surge in the number of small businesses（企业数量激增），选项 a spectacular surge in demand 把它偷换成"需求激增"，听到 surge 就选会中招。

  借用原文：a surge in the number of small businesses and companies

• B)未提及选项 much criticism from environmentalists 在录音里找不到任何对应——原文讲的是环保产品走红、生意红火，从无"被批评"之说，属凭空捏造。
• D)原词陷阱录音第2段确有 large global companies，选项 fierce competition among global companies 借这个词造出"全球公司竞争加剧"，可原文只说大公司"主导"行业，没说它们之间竞争更激烈。

  借用原文：dominated by large global companies

Why are newly developed cleaning products selling well?

明示标志 The third reason + 对应题干"new products"。The third reason is people's awareness of and knowledge about technology has never been greater 用 The third reason 直接挂出一条理由；题干问的是 newly developed products，对应的正是这条"人们更懂技术、因而信任新产品"的原因。

• people's awareness of and knowledge about technology has never been greater↔Consumers now know much more about technologyknowledge…never been greater = know much more 的同义改写

• B)未提及选项 mass production has sharply reduced the price 听上去顺理成章，但录音讲好卖的原因是环保意识、安全、懂技术，从头到尾没提"量产降价"，是用生活常识替代原文。
• C)过度推断选项 favor all that is novel（偏爱一切新奇）看似贴近"新产品"，但录音说的是人们 have faith in technology（信任技术能力），不是"凡新必爱"，把"信任技术"推成"盲目追新"推过了头。

  借用原文：they now have faith in technology's ability to do what was once thought impossible

• D)偷换概念选项 quality has been greatly improved 录音并未提及——原文讲的是消费者对技术的"认知与信任"，而非产品"质量本身"提高了，二者不能混为一谈。

What are some customers doing to help promote non-traditional cleaning products?

主语对应 customers + 动作 doing the marketing。customers are doing the marketing for these products 的主语正是题干的 customers、目的正是 help promote（做营销=帮推广），后面 by leaving… 直接交代了具体做法，是答案句。

• leaving threads of comments on social media, praising their virtues↔Writing positive comments about them on social medialeaving…comments, praising = writing positive comments 的同义改写

• A)未提及选项 Purchasing only this kind of products 里的 only（只买这一种）录音没有任何依据——原文讲顾客帮做营销、写评论，从没说他们"只"用这类产品。
• C)原词陷阱录音第4段提过 TV（advertised on TV）、第5段提过 TV shows，选项 Demonstrating on TV 借这些 TV 造"上电视演示"，可原文恰恰说这类产品没在电视宣传、且"上电视演示"是节目而非顾客所为，听到 TV 就选会中招。

  借用原文：people don't see these products in shops, or advertised on TV or in the press

• D)原词陷阱选项 Telling one another about their incomparable virtues 用了录音的 virtues，但原文顾客是"在社交媒体写评论"称赞，而非 Telling one another（互相口头转告）；盗了对的词、错在渠道。

  借用原文：leaving threads of comments on social media, praising their virtues

What problem might be caused by the growing piles of coins in fountains?

Otherwise 引出假设后果。信号是 Otherwise（否则）——它引出"如果钱不被运走会怎样"的假设性后果，正对题干问的"会造成什么问题"，紧跟其后的 could clog up the fountains' works 就是答案句的核心。

• clog up the fountains' works↔Blocking the fountains' worksclog up = Blocking 同义替换

• A)原词陷阱选项 Increasing cleaners' workload 里的 cleaners 在后文确实反复出现（喷泉由 staff 清理），但录音从没说"硬币堆积会加重清洁工负担"，是借后文的"清洁"话题诱你听到 cleaners 就选。

  借用原文：They are cleaned by the parks' staff every few weeks.

• C)原词陷阱选项 Breaking a time-honored ritual 直接搬了录音第一句的 time-honored ritual，但那句是说"投币许愿是个老传统"，是引入话题，根本不是在讲"硬币堆积造成的问题"——典型的把开头原词拿来骗。

  借用原文：Throwing spare change into a fountain is a time-honored ritual

• D)未提及选项 Polluting the fountains' water 听起来"硬币泡水里好像会污染"很合常识，但录音通篇没提水质污染，是用生活常识替文本作答的典型坑。

What does the speaker say about the coins collected from New York City's park fountains?

转折 But 后才是真意。信号是 But——前半句说"市政人员每几周清理一次"是表面信息，转折 But 之后的 most of the coins have already been removed by entrepreneurial New Yorkers 才是录音真正想强调的实情，这正是答案落点。

• go towards the fountains' maintenance itself↔used for the fountains' maintenancego towards=used for 同指用途

• A)张冠李戴选项 occasionally retrieved by curious tourists 看似对上"硬币被人提前取走"，但录音说取走硬币的是 entrepreneurial New Yorkers（有生意头脑的纽约人），不是 curious tourists（好奇游客）——把取走者的身份偷换了，属张冠李戴。

  借用原文：most of the coins have already been removed by entrepreneurial New Yorkers

• B)张冠李戴选项 donated to charity organizations 里的 charity 录音确有（罗马的钱办惠民超市、迪士尼捐寄养儿童），但那是罗马和迪士尼喷泉的事，不是本题问的纽约公园喷泉——张冠李戴。

  借用原文：Tens of thousands of dollars in coins removed from wishing wells, fountains and ponds in Florida's Walt Disney World are donated each year to support foster children

• D)未提及选项 used as wages for fountain cleaners 里 cleaners / staff 录音确有（喷泉由公园 staff 清理），但录音从没说硬币被"当作清洁工的工资"，是借"清洁"话题拼出的无中生有。

  借用原文：They are cleaned by the parks' staff every few weeks.

What do we learn about the money collected from Rome's Trevi Fountain?

goes towards 点明用途。信号是表用途的 goes towards（用于……）——它直接交代这笔钱的去向，紧跟其后的 running a supermarket for the needy 就是答案。听到 goes towards 这类"用于"的短语就锁定其后内容。

• running a supermarket for the needy↔run a supermarket for the needyrunning→run 仅词形微调

• A)原词陷阱选项 invested in a series of businesses 里 business(es) 一词录音确有（serious business 指"收钱是件正经事"），但那是形容"这事很严肃"，根本不是说钱拿去"投资做生意"——盗用 business 一词制造误会。

  借用原文：collecting that cash is serious business

• B)张冠李戴选项 used exclusively for its maintenance 描述的"专门用于喷泉维护"是录音里纽约公园喷泉和 Bryant Park 喷泉的处置，不是罗马许愿池的，张冠李戴；且 exclusively（专门、唯一）程度过死，罗马的钱是"大部分"办超市。

  借用原文：which puts the cash collected by cleaners towards the fountain's own maintenance

• D)与原文相反选项 about $40,000 a month 把数字改了：录音说的是 as much as $4,000 in loose change from around the world each day（每天约 4000 美元），选项改成"每月 4 万"——金额和时间单位都被动了手脚，是典型数字陷阱。

  借用原文：getting as much as $4,000 in loose change from around the world each day

What does the speaker say about Thomas Morgan?

人名 + 其后动作链。信号是人名 named Thomas Morgan 一出现就锁定本句，重点在它后面的动作链 fished out thousands of dollars in change over 34 years using a magnetic stick——"用磁棒钓走数千美元"就是答案核心。

• fished out thousands of dollars in change↔stole a lot of money from a fountainfished out=stole 概括偷取
• using a magnetic stick↔with a magnetic stickusing=with 同指工具

• A)张冠李戴选项 arrested for stealing money from four fountain cleaners 里的 four fountain cleaners 录音确有，但那是 2005 年警方抓的"四名监守自盗的清洁工"，是另一桩案子，跟 Thomas Morgan 无关——把别人的事安到他头上，还把"四名清洁工"从"被抓的人"偷换成"被偷的对象"。

  借用原文：police arrested four fountain cleaners after they were spotted slipping coins into their own pockets

• B)原词陷阱选项 sentenced to 34 years' imprisonment 盗用录音的数字 34 years，但录音说的是他 over 34 years 间一直作案，结果只是被 banned from the fountain（禁入喷泉），并没有"判刑 34 年"——把"作案时长"偷换成"刑期"。

  借用原文：banned him from the fountain after he fished out thousands of dollars in change over 34 years

• C)原词陷阱选项 collected rare coins from around the world 里 from around the world 录音确有（罗马许愿池收来自世界各地的零钱），但那是说硬币来源广，不是说 Morgan"收藏稀有硬币"——他是偷钱不是藏币，纯属拼凑别处原词造的无中生有。

  借用原文：as much as $4,000 in loose change from around the world each day