2021年6月·第1套 英语六级听力真题原文与答案解析

What do we learn about the man from the conversation?

被问者自述 I resigned 的直接陈述。男士开口第一段就说 It's my last day at work tomorrow. I'll start my new job in two weeks.，到第三段又点明 I resigned because I've been unhappy at that company for a long time。『resigned』『last day』『new job』几个自述合起来，明确他要离开现职——这是说话人自己交代现状的直接信号。

• I resigned↔leave his present jobresign 等于 leave the job
• It's my last day at work tomorrow.↔leave his present job明天最后一天即将离职

• A)原词陷阱选项盗用了 tell them how I really feel 这串原词，但男士说的是 I'm not sure if I should tell them how I really feel（不确定该不该说），是犹豫，不是『他将会说』。把『不确定要不要』听成『他会』，正中圈套。

  借用原文：I'm not sure if I should tell them how I really feel

• B)原词陷阱选项偷用了 in two weeks 这个时间词，但原文是 I'll start my new job in two weeks（两周后开始新工作），根本没提『见新经理』。听到 two weeks 就选 B，是被数字原词牵着走。

  借用原文：I'll start my new job in two weeks

• C)偷换概念选项借了原文反复出现的 interview 一词，但原文的 conduct an interview with me before I leave 和 an exit interview 是『离职面谈』，而非 a job interview（求职面试）。同一个 interview，性质完全不同。

  借用原文：an exit interview

What does the woman think about the information gained from an exit interview?

supposed to be 表『本应当』的主张。女士说 An exit interview is supposed to be private, but often isn't，be supposed to 表示『理应、本该』，正是她对这信息该如何的主张：本该保密。后半 but often isn't 是补充现实，但她持的立场仍是『应当保密』。

• supposed to be private↔It should be kept privatesupposed to be 等于 should be

• B)未提及选项 carefully analyzed 在录音里找不到对应说法，女士谈的是保密与被滥用，没有提到『仔细分析』。这是凭空添加的内容。
• C)原词陷阱选项盗用了 senior managers 这个原词，但原文是 traded among senior managers（在高管间被当把柄交易），是负面滥用，而非 useful to senior managers（对高管有用）这种正面评价。听到 senior managers 就选，正中陷阱。

  借用原文：can be traded among senior managers

• D)与原文相反选项 improve interviewees' job prospects（改善求职前景）与原文方向相反：录音第8段说乱说话会 injuring your future career prospects（损害前途），是变坏不是变好。极性被反转了。

  借用原文：injuring your future career prospects

Why does the man want to rethink what he will say in the coming exit interview?

it could affect 表担忧的因果句。男士说 Now you've got me rethinking what I'll disclose，紧接 There is always a chance that it could affect my reputation and my ability to network in the industry。could affect 点出他改主意的原因——怕影响声誉和人脉；下一段女士又用 injuring your future career prospects 把这归结为『损害未来职业前景』，因果信号明确。

• affect my reputation and my ability to network in the industry↔adversely affect his future career prospects声誉人脉受损概括为前途受损
• injuring your future career prospects↔adversely affect his future career prospectsinjure 等于 adversely affect

• A)未提及选项 negative impression on the interviewer 借了话题里的 interview 氛围，但男士担心的是声誉和人脉、行业里的名声，从没提『给面试官留下负面印象』。这是没有依据的添加。
• C)张冠李戴选项盗用了第6段 dirt against another manager 的 manager 语境，但那是女士讲『信息被用来对付别的经理』，并非男士改主意是怕惹自己的顶头上司。把别处的内容嫁接到本题原因上，是张冠李戴。

  借用原文：used as dirt against another manager

• D)未提及选项 harm to his fellow employees 在录音里找不到对应：男士担心的是自己的前途，女士谈的是信息被高管滥用，谁都没说会伤到同事。这是凭空捏造的受害对象。

What does the man think he had better do?

Perhaps it would be better 表打算的建议句。对话临近结尾，男士说 Perhaps it would be better getting things off my chest by going to one of those rate-your-employer websites。it would be better 直接表达他认为更好的做法，正是题干『had better do』要找的打算句，出现在对话后半段，符合建议常落尾部的规律。

• getting things off my chest↔Pour out his frustrationsget off chest 等于 pour out frustrations
• going to one of those rate-your-employer websites↔on a rate-your-employer website同一渠道名几乎原样对应

• A)未提及选项 Prepare a comprehensive exit report 借了话题里的 exit 一词，造出『写一份详尽的离职报告』，但录音里男士从没说要写报告。这是凭空添加的方案。
• B)原词陷阱选项 Do some practice for the exit interview 盗用了 exit interview 这一原词，但全程没有任何人提到『为面谈做练习』；女士最后反而说 don't do the interview at all（干脆别做这面谈）。听到 exit interview 就选，正中原词陷阱。

  借用原文：don't do the interview at all

• C)原词陷阱选项 Network with his close friends to find a better employer 借了第7段 network in the industry 的 network 一词，但原文的 network 是『在行业建人脉』且是怕受损，并非『找好友另找雇主』。盗 network 来拼错意，是原词陷阱。

  借用原文：my ability to network in the industry

What does the man want Jane Forster to talk about?

主持人的直接请求句。信号是主持人发出的请求 Can you tell us a little about it?，其中 it 回指上一句的 your latest documentary——一问一请求，正是他想让她谈的对象，答案就落在这句。

• your latest documentary↔Her latest documentary.近乎原词对应

• A)原词陷阱unsuccessful journey 借了对话后段主持人那句 was the journey unsuccessful? 的原词，但那是结尾另一问，并非开场主持人请她谈的话题，听到 unsuccessful/journey 就选属于答非所问。

  借用原文：was the journey unsuccessful?

• B)原词陷阱month-long expedition 借了她回答里 my expedition 与 planned to be there for a month 的原词拼成，但主持人开场请她谈的是纪录片本身，不是"为期一月的远征"这件事，属答非所问。

  借用原文：my expedition

• D)原词陷阱career as a botanist 借了开场 the renowned botanist 的原词，但主持人没有请她谈"植物学家的职业生涯"，只请她谈纪录片，听到 botanist 就选属答非所问。

  借用原文：the renowned botanist

Why does the woman describe her experience as "far from glamorous"?

原话之后的连串列举。信号是她说完 far from glamorous 后一口气列举多重恶劣条件：accessible only by canoe、living conditions in the hut were primitive、no electricity、water supply was a nearby stream。连珠炮式的多项困难，正是答案句。

• the living conditions in the hut were primitive↔She had to endure many hardships.多项困难概括为吃苦

• A)原词陷阱live like a vegetarian（像素食者一样生活）极易与录音里 the vegetation indigenous to the rainforest 的 vegetation 听混，但 vegetation 是"植被"、vegetarian 是"素食者"，原文从未说她被迫吃素，属听音致误的相近词陷阱。

  借用原文：the vegetation indigenous to the rainforest

• B)原词陷阱caught in a hurricane 借了后文 a hurricane was approaching 的原词，但飓风是导致提前结束（第 7 题）的原因，并非她说 far from glamorous 的缘由，张冠李戴到本题。

  借用原文：a hurricane was approaching

• D)偷换概念water shortage（缺水）盗用了 our water supply was a nearby stream 里的 water，但原文是说"水源是条小溪"（条件简陋），并非缺水；且只取一样困难，与"many hardships"的总括不符。

  借用原文：our water supply was a nearby stream

Why did the woman and those who went with her end their trip halfway?

received news that + had to 因果链。信号是 we received news that a hurricane was approaching 接着 we had to evacuate——"得知飓风逼近"是因、"被迫撤离"是果，had to 的被迫语气坐实了这就是提前结束的原因句。

• a hurricane was approaching↔A hurricane was coming.approaching 同义于 coming

• B)未提及flood（洪水）在录音里从未出现，它借了后文 river rapids（激流）造成的"和水有关"的联想，但原文撤离原因是飓风不是洪水，属凭联想编造的未提及项。
• C)原词陷阱no more food in the canoe 借了 accessible only by canoe 的 canoe，但原文从没提食物耗尽，独木舟是"进出方式"而非"断粮地点"，听到 canoe 就选属原词陷阱。

  借用原文：accessible only by canoe

• D)原词陷阱no longer bear the humidity 借了 the humidity was almost unbearable 的 humidity，但潮湿是描述天气难受（第 6/8 题背景），不是中途撤离的原因——撤离是因飓风，张冠李戴到本题。

  借用原文：the humidity was almost unbearable

What does the woman think of the journey?

强烈否定 + 反转后的正向定调。信号是主持人问 was the journey unsuccessful?（负面设问），她以 Absolutely not. 强烈否定反转，再用 gathered a massive amount of data 给出正向定调——"不是失败、收获巨大"才是她的真实态度。

• We gathered a massive amount of data↔It was fruitful.采集海量数据等于有收获

• A)未提及memorable（难忘）听上去是正面评价，像能套上整段经历，但她对行程的总评落点是"有收获"，原文并未说"难忘"，属凭褒义氛围误推、原文未提及的态度。
• B)与原文相反unbearable 盗自 the humidity was almost unbearable，那是形容潮湿天气难忍，并非她对整段 journey 的评价；况且她明确否定行程失败，态度是正面，与 unbearable 相反。

  借用原文：the humidity was almost unbearable

• C)与原文相反uneventful（平淡无事）与原文截然相反——她经历了飓风逼近、紧急撤离、激流行船，行程绝非平淡，这是把惊险经历反说成平淡的反向干扰。

  借用原文：It was frightening.

What does the passage say about the use of jargon terms by experts?

定性词harmful＋对比。答案句的信号是定性词 the harmful effects（有害影响）和紧随其后的对比结果 less interested in science：录音先给出"有害"的定性，再用接触术语者 vs 未接触者的对照坐实是哪种害处，这两处合起来就是答案落点。

• less interested in science↔diminishes laymen's interest in science形容词改写为动词
• people exposed to jargon↔laymen's interestpeople＝laymen

• B)原词陷阱B 盗用了术语话题里反复出现的 science 一词，编出 ensures the accuracy of their arguments.（确保论点准确）。但原文只说术语"有害"、让人兴趣下降，从未说它"确保准确"，方向正相反，是听到 science 就想选的原词陷阱。

  借用原文：less interested in science

• C)与原文相反C 说术语 makes their expressions more explicit.（使表达更清晰），是正面作用；但原文定性是 the harmful effects，且第 2 段说术语 sends a discouraging message，方向与 C 完全相反，属与原文相反的干扰。

  借用原文：the harmful effects of this practice

• D)未提及D 说术语 hurts laymen's dignity and self-esteem.（伤害外行尊严与自尊）。原文确实讲了多种负面后果——兴趣下降、感觉 less informed、less qualified to discuss，但从未提"尊严/自尊"，dignity、self-esteem 是原文没出现的概念，属未提及。

What do researchers find about people reading scientific articles containing jargon terms?

研究发现动词＋后续转折。信号是 researchers found that（研究者发现）这个直接报告发现的动词，题干 find 与它对应；其后还有 They found the opposite when a text is easier to read. 的对比，进一步把"含术语→怀疑"这一发现衬得更实。听到 researchers found 就锁定这句。

• led people to doubt the actual science↔They tend to disbelieve the actual science.doubt＝disbelieve
• reading scientific articles containing jargon led people↔Theypeople＝They

• A)答非所问A 说他们 can learn to communicate with scientists.，借用了全篇关于"沟通"的话题氛围（如 communicating with laymen），但原文讲的是读者"怀疑科学"，从没说读者会"学会与科学家沟通"，属答非所问。

  借用原文：communicating with laymen

• C)与原文相反C 说他们 feel great respect towards scientists.（对科学家更敬重），是正面反应；但原文是 doubt the actual science（怀疑科学），方向相反。读术语文章让人更不信、而非更敬重，属与原文相反。

  借用原文：led people to doubt the actual science

• D)过度推断D 说他们 will see the complexity of science.（会看到科学的复杂），蹭了第 4 段 complex science subjects 的 complex 一词，听着"合理"。但答案句说的是"怀疑科学"，不是"看到科学复杂"，原文未就读者得出"看到复杂性"这一发现，属过度推断。

  借用原文：complex science subjects

What does Schulman suggest scientists do when communicating with the general public?

转折But＋建议need to。双重信号：先是转折 But（前句说术语对专业听众尚可，But 后才是对大众的真正主张），再是建议动词 need to eliminate jargon。转折后＋need to 之处，正是对策题答案落点。

• eliminate jargon↔Do away with jargon terms.eliminate＝do away with

• A)未提及A 说要 Find appropriate topics.（找合适话题）。原文给的建议是"去掉术语"，全篇没谈"挑选话题"，topics 虽在前文出现过（如 read about the same topics），但从未作为给科学家的建议，属未提及。
• B)答非所问B 说要 Stimulate their interest.（激发兴趣）。原文确实提到术语让人 less interested in science，但 Schulman 的具体建议是"去掉术语"，并未把"激发兴趣"列为要做的动作，B 是顺着"兴趣"话题编的笼统干扰。

  借用原文：less interested in science

• C)与原文相反C 说要 Explain all the jargon terms.（解释所有术语），盗用了原文 jargon 一词，且第 1 段还专门说过 it made no difference if the jargon terms were defined——解释/定义术语根本无效。建议是"去掉"而非"解释"，C 正好取了原文否定掉的做法，是与原文相反。

  借用原文：it made no difference if the jargon terms were defined in the text

What did Texas businessman Pattillo Higgins believe?

信号词 became convinced 直接交代所信。录音里 became convinced that there was oil below the gassy hill 中的 became convinced（确信）正是表达人物信念的标志词，题干问 believe，听到 convinced 这类同义表态词就锁定这句。

• there was oil below the gassy hill↔There were oil deposits below a local gassy hilloil 扩写为 oil deposits，句意不变

• A)原词陷阱A 借了第一段 schoolboys would sometimes set the hill on fire 的失火画面，但那是描述男孩点火，不是 Higgins 的信念，问的是他相信什么，答非所问。

  借用原文：schoolboys would sometimes set the hill on fire

• B)偷换概念B 说 oil leakage（漏油）发生在海湾沿岸，但录音是 Higgins 确信油 below the gassy hill（埋在山下），是埋藏不是泄漏；且漏出来的是气不是油，对象与状态都改了。

  借用原文：there was oil below the gassy hill

• C)过度推断C 说 erupting gas 可能危及当地儿童，录音第一段只提到 schoolboys would sometimes set the hill on fire，是男孩主动点火，从没说气体会危及他们，属无中生有。

  借用原文：schoolboys would sometimes set the hill on fire

What prevented Higgins' workers from digging a proper hole to get the oil?

信号词 defeated 标出受阻原因。The sand under the hill defeated several attempts 里 defeated（挫败）正对题干的 prevented，主语 The sand under the hill 就是那个让挖洞失败的障碍，听到表挫败、阻挡的动词就锁其主语。

• The sand under the hill↔The sand under the hill.原句主语原样搬入选项

• A)原词陷阱A 说 The massive gas underground.，录音确实反复讲 gas（漏气的山），但让挖洞失败的是 sand 不是 gas，气体只是山的特征，盗用耳熟的 gas 来骗选。

  借用原文：gas leakage was so noticeable

• B)未提及B 说工人 lack of the needed skill（缺技术），录音只说沙子让他们多次失败，从没说是工人技术不行，把客观障碍换成人为不足，属无中生有。
• D)未提及D 说 lack of suitable tools（缺合适工具），录音只字未提工具问题，障碍始终是山下的沙子，同样是凭想象补出的人为原因。

What does the passage say about Captain Lucas' drilling method?

信号词 created 点出方法的成果。his innovations created the modern oil drilling industry 里 created（开创）直接交代这套方法的历史成果，问 say about method 时，听到这种交代成果、影响的动词就锁定该句。

• his innovations created the modern oil drilling industry↔It gave birth to the oil drilling industry.created 同义替换为 gave birth to

• A)过度推断A 说该方法 rendered many oil workers jobless（使许多石油工人失业），录音只说它开创了钻探业，从没提失业，凭对新技术抢饭碗的常识联想出来，原文无据。
• B)与原文相反B 说 It was not as effective as he claimed.（不如他宣称的有效），录音对该方法是正面肯定 his innovations created the modern oil drilling industry，B 把肯定改成否定质疑，极性相反。

  借用原文：his innovations created the modern oil drilling industry

• D)未提及D 说 It was not popularized until years later.（多年后才普及），录音只讲该法当即开创了行业，没说推广被推迟，时间信息属虚构。

What do we learn about Texas oil industry boom?

转折信号 changed that 是结论落点。录音先铺垫德州 almost entirely rural 的旧貌，紧接一句 Higgins' well changed that，changed that（改变了这一切）是从旧貌转向新局的转折落点，答案就在这一转之后，听到 changed that 即锁定。

• Texas was almost entirely rural, with no large cities and practically no industry; cotton and beef were the foundation of the economy. Higgins' well changed that↔It radically transformed the state's economy.从农业旧貌到 changed that 概括为彻底改变经济

• B)原词陷阱B 说造成 oil surplus all over the world（全世界石油过剩），录音只说 the sudden surplus of petroleum was not entirely a blessing for Texas，过剩是德州本地的事，B 盗用 surplus 一词却把范围放大到全世界，范围被夸大。

  借用原文：the sudden surplus of petroleum was not entirely a blessing for Texas

• C)过度推断C 说 totally destroyed the state's rural landscape（彻底毁掉乡村景观），录音确实说德州曾 almost entirely rural，但只讲经济被改变，从没说乡村景观被毁，盗用 rural 一词加 totally 夸大。

  借用原文：Texas was almost entirely rural

• D)偷换概念D 说 ruined the state's cotton and beef industries（毁掉棉花和牛肉业），录音里 cotton and beef were the foundation of the economy 是讲它们曾是旧支柱、后被石油经济取代，并未说被毁掉，盗用 cotton and beef 偷换成 ruined。

  借用原文：cotton and beef were the foundation of the economy

What is a primary cause of employee dissatisfaction according to recent research?

题干原话几乎照搬的点题句。录音开篇第二句就用 A primary cause of employee dissatisfaction, according to fresh research, is that…，与题干 a primary cause of employee dissatisfaction according to recent research 几乎逐词对应——这种「题干就是录音句的复述」是最强的答案句信号，is that 之后的内容即答案。

• they have terrible managers↔Bad managers.terrible 同义改写为 bad

• A)未提及Unsuitable jobs.（不合适的岗位）录音通篇未提，整段都在讲管理者的问题，从没说员工不满是因为岗位不对口，属凭常识自行脑补的归因。
• C)原词陷阱Insufficient motivation.（动力不足）看似呼应录音后文谈管理者「缺乏 drive（干劲）」的描述，但那是在说坏管理者的个人特征（第 4 段），不是员工不满的主因；它把「动力」这个似曾相识的概念安到了错误的问题上。

  借用原文：those without drive

• D)答非所问Tough regulations.（严苛的规章）勉强能让人联想到第 3 段的 toxic 工作环境，但录音从未把「规章严苛」列为员工不满的主因；本题问的是开篇点明的 primary cause，规章既非原话、也非主因。

What is one of the causes for poor management practices?

分点信号 The first cause + 收尾点出 toxic。录音用 The first cause was company culture 起头明确这是分点罗列的第一条成因，又在段末用 Such workplaces are sometimes described as toxic. 把这种公司文化点名为 toxic（有毒的）——首句立题、末句给出关键词，前后夹住的就是答案句。

• The first cause was company culture↔Toxic company culture.company culture 原词 + toxic 由原文回收

• A)原词陷阱Ineffective training.（无效的培训）盗用了录音 minimal training（极少的培训）里的 training 一词来勾人，但录音说的是培训「太少」，不是培训「无效」；况且 minimal training 只是 company culture 这条大成因下的一个细节，本身不是独立成因。

  借用原文：minimal training

• C)偷换概念Lack of regular evaluation.（缺少定期评估）借用了录音 a lack of accountability（缺乏问责）的 lack of 句式来制造耳熟感，但 accountability（问责）≠ evaluation（评估），录音从未说缺少「定期评估」；这是把一个近形概念偷换进来。

  借用原文：a lack of accountability

• D)未提及Overburdening of managers.（管理者负担过重）听起来像在替管理者开脱，但录音四条成因（公司文化、管理者性格、资历不足、靠资历晋升）里没有一条说管理者「负担过重」，纯属未提及。

What do we learn about the study on job dissatisfaction?

结尾提示语 A point worth making + only。录音末段用 A point worth making is that…（有一点值得说明）这种「特意提醒」的强调语引出关键句，后面紧跟 the study was based only on the perspective of employees，only 一词锁死研究的取材范围——结尾的特意强调语就是答案句信号。

• the study was based only on the perspective of employees↔It was based only on the perspective of employees.几乎逐词对应的复述
• The researchers didn't ask senior leaders↔only on the perspective of employees否定句从反面印证 only

• A)与原文相反It collected feedback from both employers and employees.（向雇主和雇员双方收集反馈）盗用了录音里真实出现的 employees 一词，却把范围从「只问员工」夸成「双方都问」；录音明说 The researchers didn't ask senior leaders，恰恰否定了 both。

  借用原文：the study was based only on the perspective of employees

• B)张冠李戴It was conducted from frontline managers' point of view.（研究从一线管理者的视角进行）搬来了录音 their frontline managers 这个原词，但录音说研究是从员工视角做的，frontline managers 是被评价的对象、不是研究的视角；选项把视角张冠李戴了。

  借用原文：what they thought of their frontline managers

• C)过度推断It provided meaningful clues to solving the problem.（研究为解决问题提供了有价值的线索）是一句听起来很顺、很积极的评价，但末段只交代研究的取材局限（只问员工、高层没问），从没说它给出了「解决问题的有价值线索」，属凭常识脑补的拔高。

What does the passage say about the mining industry in Western Australia?

开头点题的总括句。篇章独白的总判断常落在开头：录音第一句 mining companies in the vast Australian desert state of Western Australia are definitely taking the lead 直接给出西澳矿业的整体定位——在自动化（无人驾驶车辆）上领先，这就是答案句。

• driverless vehicles↔automation无人驾驶=自动化的同义改写
• taking the lead↔revolution领先变革=同主题呼应

• B)原词陷阱选项 bringing prosperity to the region 借用了录音里反复出现的地域词（desert state、remote communities）制造熟悉感，但录音第一句讲的是该矿业领先于自动化，并未说它给地区带来繁荣，属听到地域词就想选的陷阱。

  借用原文：the area's remoteness

• C)未提及选项 yielding an unprecedented profit 听上去与矿业赚钱顺理成章，但录音开头讲的是技术领先，全文只提到 financial imperatives、more productive 这类追求效率的动因，从未说产出空前利润，属未提及。
• D)偷换概念选项 expanding at an accelerating speed 蹭了录音里 taking the lead、a technological leap 的进取气势，但录音说的是矿业在自动化技术上领先、是技术跃进，而非整个行业在加速扩张规模，把技术领先偷换成了规模扩张。

  借用原文：They are a technological leap

What is the impact of the digitization of the mining industry?

因果动词 creating 引出影响。录音第 6 段 The automation and digitization of the industry are creating a need for different jobs 用 creating a need for 直接点出数字化的后果是催生新岗位，正对题干所问的 impact，是答案句。

• creating a need for different jobs↔creates a lot of new jobs催生岗位需求=创造新岗位
• data scientists and engineers in automation and artificial intelligence↔a lot of new jobs举例的具体岗位=新岗位的实证

• A)未提及选项 exhausts resources sooner 借矿业必然涉及资源的常识制造合理感，但录音通篇讲数字化带来岗位变化与可持续，从未说它更快耗尽资源，原文无此判断。
• C)原词陷阱选项 conflicts between employers and employees 蹭了录音里 employees、workers' unions 这些词，但录音讲工会有保留是出于对偏远社区的担忧，并未说数字化在劳资双方间引发冲突，把工会的保留偷换成了劳资对立。

  借用原文：Workers' unions have accepted the inevitability of the introduction of new technology

• D)偷换概念选项 retraining of unskilled mining workers 借用了录音里的 mining、workers，但录音说数字化需要的是数据科学家、工程师这类新型人才，并未提对非技术矿工的再培训，把催生新岗位偷换成了再培训旧工人。

  借用原文：data scientists and engineers in automation and artificial intelligence

What is the attitude of workers' unions towards the introduction of new technology?

转折 But 后才是真态度。录音先说工会 accepted（接受），紧接 But they still have reservations 用 But 转出真态度——仍有保留。态度题的落点在转折之后，前半的接受只是铺垫。

• have accepted the inevitability↔accept it接受=accept，态度同向
• still have reservations↔with reservations仍有保留=with reservations

• A)与原文相反选项 welcome it with open arms 把工会的态度拔高成热烈欢迎，只接住了 But 前的 accepted，丢了 But 后的 reservations，态度偏正、过头了。

  借用原文：have accepted the inevitability of the introduction of new technology

• B)原词陷阱选项 wait to see its effect 借用了录音里讲影响（impact、effect）的语境制造熟悉感，但录音说工会已经接受、只是有保留，并非按兵不动地观望效果，原文无观望此意。

  借用原文：the most significant impact of robotic technology

• C)与原文相反选项 strongly opposed to it 抓住录音里 reservations、main concern 的负面情绪，把有保留放大成强烈反对，但工会明说已经 accepted，并未反对，态度极性反了。

  借用原文：they still have reservations about the rise of automation technology

What does the speaker say about traffic accidents in Thailand?

地名加数字即落点。第一段开门见山点出 Thailand's annual road-death rate is almost double the global average，地名 Thailand 加上倍数 double 同时出现，正是预读时盯的两个锚点，这一句就是答案句。

• almost double the global average↔about twice that of the global averagedouble 同义于 twice
• Thailand's annual road-death rate↔Their annual death rate代词回指加省略

• A)未提及Their cost to the nation's economy is incalculable. 谈经济成本不可估量，录音第一段只说死亡率高、并说这本可改变，从未提及对经济的成本，属凭常识脑补的无中生有。
• B)张冠李戴They kill more people than any infectious disease. 里的 infectious disease 确实在录音出现，但那是第二段讲全球情况 road accidents kill more people every year than any infectious disease，主语是 Globally 而非泰国，被错安到了泰国头上。

  借用原文：road accidents kill more people every year than any infectious disease

• D)与原文相反They have experienced a gradual decline since the year of 2017 说泰国死亡率自 2017 年逐渐下降，2017 这个年份录音第二段 the death toll in 2017 确实念到，但那是全球死亡人数的统计年份，且原文说泰国道路危险本可改变、并无下降之说，极性正好相反。

  借用原文：the death toll in 2017

What do we learn from an American institute's statistics regarding road deaths?

转折 But 后才是真意。前半句说总数基本平稳，紧接 But that disguises a lot of changes in individual countries，转折词 But 之后才是说话人真正强调的那层意思——这组数据掩盖了个体国家的变化，正是答案落点。

• that disguises a lot of changes in individual countries↔They don't reflect the changes in individual countries.disguise 转写为 don't reflect

• A)张冠李戴They show a difference between rich and poor nations. 说贫富差异——贫富国家的对比确在录音第三段出现 In many poor countries … In many rich countries, by contrast，但那是后文展开的内容，并非这组美国机构统计本身得出的结论，题干问的恰是这组统计，张冠李戴了。

  借用原文：In many poor countries … In many rich countries, by contrast

• C)与原文相反They rise and fall from year to year. 说死亡数逐年起落，恰与原文 has been more or less static since the turn of the century（大体保持平稳）相反，把平稳说成了波动。

  借用原文：has been more or less static since the turn of the century

• D)未提及They are not as reliable as claimed. 质疑这组美国机构统计的可靠性，但录音对这组数据只说它平稳、它掩盖了各国变化，从未说它不可靠（说统计不充分的是第三段的穷国官方统计，非这组）。

What is said about middle-income countries?

群体名加并列实例。第四段点出 middle-income countries 后，立即用 China、South Africa、India、Philippines 一连串实例说明 traffic deaths have been falling，群体名加并列例证处即答案句。

• traffic deaths have been falling since 2000↔Many of them have seen a decline in road-death rates.falling 名词化为 a decline
• in China and South Africa … in India … the Philippines↔Many of them多国列举概括为 Many of them

• A)张冠李戴Many of them have increasing numbers of cars on the road. 说车辆增多，increasing 与车确在录音出现，但那是第三段讲穷国 a fast-growing fleet of cars and motorbikes，说的是低收入国家而非中等收入国家，主体错位。

  借用原文：a fast-growing fleet of cars and motorbikes

• B)与原文相反Many of them are following the example set by Thailand. 说这些国家效仿泰国，可原文恰恰相反——whether Thailand can soon follow suit，是问泰国能否效仿这些国家，方向被颠倒了。

  借用原文：whether Thailand can soon follow suit

• D)原词陷阱Many of them are investing heavily in infrastructure. 里的 infrastructure 确在录音末段出现 not just in better infrastructure，但那是讲解决办法、且说光靠基建不够，根本没说中等收入国家在大举投资基建，属原词陷阱式的答非所问。

  借用原文：not just in better infrastructure

What else could be done to reduce fatal road accidents in addition to safer roads?

提对策句 solution lies in。末段直接给方案 The solution lies not just in better infrastructure, but in better social incentives，The solution lies in 是典型的提对策信号，紧接着 Safe driving habits 把社会激励落到培养安全驾驶习惯，这一串就是答案句。

• better social incentives↔Foster better driving behavior.概念落地的同义改写

• B)未提及Provide better training for drivers. 说给司机更好的培训，听上去很对症，但录音只说要靠社会激励养成习惯，从未提到培训 driver，属凭常识脑补。
• C)与原文相反Abolish all outdated traffic rules. 里的 traffic 与法规确呼应录音 traffic laws that are actually enforced，但原文是要让交通法规真正得到执行，选项却说废除过时规则，方向相反，且 all、outdated 更是无中生有的绝对化。

  借用原文：traffic laws that are actually enforced

• D)过度推断Impose heavier penalties on speeding. 顺着 traffic laws that are actually enforced 的执法语境联想出加重处罚、罚超速，可原文只说让法规真正被执行，既没说加重 penalties，也没专门提 speeding，属过度推断。

  借用原文：traffic laws that are actually enforced