2025年12月·第2套 英语六级听力真题原文与答案解析

What does the woman say about the food at the canteen?

被问者的直接应答 + 转折否定。男士先抛出 the prices are absurd 并反问 Don't you agree，女士的应答 I don't, actually 是一句明确的否定回应，紧接 I personally think they're perfectly appropriate——『被问者的直接否定+亮明己见』正是答案句信号，女士的真实态度全在这句。

• perfectly appropriate↔appropriately priced同根词改写：appropriate→appropriately priced

• A)原词陷阱It is absurdly expensive. 直接挪用了录音里的 absurd，但说 the prices are absurd 的是男士、不是女士，女士恰恰否定了这一点。听到 absurd 就选 A，正中『听到原词就选』的陷阱。

  借用原文：the prices are absurd

• C)原词陷阱It brings shame on the university. 借用了录音里的 shame，但男士那句 Shame about the food. 是英式口语『可惜了这食物』的意思，并非『给学校丢脸』，且也不是女士对食物的评价。听到 shame 就联想到『丢脸』属于偷换概念。

  借用原文：Shame about the food.

• D)答非所问It caters to students and teachers. 挪用了录音 both for students and teachers，但那是男士在说食堂作为聚会点适合师生，谈的是场所、不是『食物』，与题目问的食物评价不沾边。

  借用原文：both for students and teachers

How does the woman feel about the canteen's sweet things or fancy delicacies?

含蓄否定 never...crave 表态度。女士说 I never really crave sweet things or any fancy delicacies，crave（渴望）配 never 是一句明确的『提不起兴趣』表态，正是答案信号——态度题就听这种带 never/really 的情感动词。

• I never really crave sweet things or any fancy delicacies↔They never really appeal to her.主被动视角转换：我不想要它→它不吸引我

• B)答非所问They are never actually good value. 蹭了录音里关于价格的讨论（desserts are overpriced），但题目问的是女士对甜点的『感受/兴趣』，女士给出的态度是『不想吃』，而非评价它们『不划算』。把态度偷换成性价比。

  借用原文：desserts are overpriced

• C)与原文相反They are within students' budgets. 挪用了前文男士谈预算的 beyond most students' budgets，且与原文相反（男士说甜点超出预算），更何况它讲的是价格不是女士的态度，双重错位。

  借用原文：beyond most students' budgets

• D)张冠李戴They always come at a high speed. 借用了录音里关于上菜快的描述（They also come out really fast），但那是男士夸炒蛋出餐快，被安到了甜点和女士态度上，张冠李戴又答非所问。

  借用原文：They also come out really fast

What does the man say is one of the best things about the canteen?

最高级 one of the best 后直接点名。男士说 that's one of the best things about the canteen — the speed，破折号后直接点出 the speed，是最高级语气+明确点名的答案信号，落点一目了然。

• the speed↔The speed.原词直接对应

• A)原词陷阱The food. 是全程反复出现的话题词，但男士对食物的评价是 the food is just OK，远谈不上『最好之一』，听到 food 高频出现就选属于被话题词诱导。

  借用原文：the food is just OK

• B)答非所问The space. 对应录音后文 It's a very versatile space，那是夸空间多用途，但并非男士点名的『best things』之一，落点不符。

  借用原文：It's a very versatile space

• D)张冠李戴The environment. 对应女士那句 it's such a great environment too，确实被夸，但夸环境的是女士、且不是男士点名的『最好之一』，张冠李戴又非答案落点。

  借用原文：it's such a great environment too

What did the canteen undergo a few years ago?

时间状语 a few years ago 标记答案句。女士说 they did a massive renovation a few years ago，时间状语 a few years ago 与题干完全对上，是答案句的定位信号；其谓语 did a massive renovation 即所问事件。

• a massive renovation↔A massive renovation.原词对应，但需与近义项 expansion 切开

• A)偷换概念A complete refurnishing. 蹭了改造话题，但 refurnishing 是『重新配置家具』，与录音 a massive renovation（整体翻新）程度和性质都不同，是偷换概念。

  借用原文：a massive renovation

• B)未提及A ruinous burning down. 是『毁灭性烧毁』，录音通篇在夸食堂漂亮、做过翻新，根本没提任何火灾，纯属无中生有。
• C)偷换概念A substantial expansion. 与答案 D 同样表『大规模』，借 massive/substantial 的近似制造混淆，但 expansion 是『扩建、变大』，录音说的是 renovation（翻新），并非扩大面积，差在动作名词上。

  借用原文：a massive renovation

According to the woman, what view about today's young people is not really justified?

女方自问句 + that's not justified。答案句出自女方之口：先抛出常见说法 young people today have a poor work ethic，紧接 That's not really justified though 直接呼应题干的 not justified。「常听说……不过站不住脚」这个先立后破的句式，就是答案落点的信号。

• young people today have a poor work ethic↔They have a poor work ethic.几乎原句搬到选项

• B)原词陷阱选项 They don't get along with managers. 盗用了对话主题里反复出现的 managers，但女方在 P1 里判为「站不住脚」的说法是职业道德差，从没说年轻人和管理者合不来，属答非所问。

  借用原文：young people today have a poor work ethic

• C)张冠李戴选项 They are struggling in the workplace. 借了后文 if you are struggling to work with young people 里的 struggling，但那是说「管理者难以与年轻人共事」，并非女方在第 1 段判为不成立的看法，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：if you are struggling to work with young people

• D)张冠李戴选项 They aren't as varied as their predecessors. 与男方 young people of this age group are as varied and multifaceted as any other generation 正好相反：男方说「和任何一代一样多样」，选项却说「不如前人多样」，极性被反转，且这话也不是女方所说。

  借用原文：as varied and multifaceted as any other generation

What does the man say is important for managers to get along better with young workers?

两个强调句 essential / important。男方连用 it's essential to 和 It's also really important to recognize 两处强调，正面回答「什么重要」。题干落在 work-life balance 一支，对应的正是 recognize the way young people want to balance their work life with their personal life 这句。

• recognize the way young people want to balance their work life with their personal life↔Recognizing how they try to strike a work-life balance.balance their work...life=work-life balance

• A)原词陷阱选项 Learning about the way they adhere to their own values. 盗用了 learn about their values 里的 values，可男方说的是「了解他们的价值观」，不是「了解他们如何坚守自己的价值观（adhere to）」，多塞了 adhere 这层原文没有的意思，答非所问。

  借用原文：connect with them to learn about their values

• C)原词陷阱选项 Knowing how they struggle to connect with managers. 把 connect with them 的 connect 与别处的 struggle、主题词 managers 拼到一起，但男方说的是「与他们建立联系去了解价值观」，从没说年轻人「难以与管理者建立联系」，纯属拼凑。

  借用原文：it's essential to connect with them

• D)原词陷阱选项 Understanding the way they seek career advancement. 借了 defer happiness in return for career advancement 的 career advancement，但那出自女方提问、且说的是年轻人「不愿」为升迁牺牲幸福；男方此处答「重要的是」并未把「理解他们如何追求升迁」列为关键，张冠李戴又答非所问。

  借用原文：defer happiness in return for career advancement

How do young people measure their productivity levels according to the man?

not…by hours, Instead…by quality。男方先用 should not be measured by the number of hours 否定按时长，再用 Instead 引出真正口径 by the quality of the work they perform。Instead 之后才是答案落点，前半是被否定的干扰。

• by the quality of the work they perform↔By the quality of the work they do.perform=do，其余原样

• A)与原文相反选项 In terms of the number of hours spent. 几乎照搬 the number of hours they work，但这恰恰是男方用 should not be measured 明确否定掉的口径，选它正中陷阱。

  借用原文：should not be measured by the number of hours they work

• B)偷换概念选项 By the amount of work they perform. 借了原文的 work、perform，但把口径换成「工作的数量（amount）」，男方说的是质量而非数量，偷换了概念。

  借用原文：the quality of the work they perform

• C)原词陷阱选项 In terms of the work done in 8 hours. 盗用 work for eight hours 的 eight hours，但那只是男方举例说明「干八小时也可能毫无成果」、用来反证不该按时长，并非衡量口径本身，答非所问。

  借用原文：someone can work for eight hours and accomplish next to nothing

What companies does the man think would appeal to young workers?

末段总结句 a company whose values align。对话收尾男方给出结论 stay working at a company whose values align with their own，直接定义了吸引年轻人的公司类型。这是对话末尾的总结落点，正面回答题干。

• a company whose values align with their own↔Those whose values align with their own.a company=Those，定语原样

• A)原词陷阱选项 Those whose culture facilitates their advancement. 把主题氛围词 culture 与女方提问里的 career advancement 拼合，但男方末段说的是「价值观一致」，从没说公司文化要「助推升迁」，纯属拼凑且不是结论。

  借用原文：defer happiness in return for career advancement

• B)偷换概念选项 Those allowing them to do projects of their choice. 盗用 work on projects that matter 的 projects，可男方说的是做「有意义的（matter）」项目，不是「他们自选的（of their choice）」项目，偷偷改了限定，与原文不符。

  借用原文：work on projects that matter to themselves, the company or the world at large

• D)原词陷阱选项 Those refraining from discrediting their perspectives. 借了 Such a perspective can be hard to discredit 的 discredit、perspective，但那是女方提问里说「这种看法很难被否定」，并非男方对「吸引人的公司」给出的特征，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：Such a perspective can be hard to discredit, can't it?

What does a new study suggest about restaurants including vegetarian sections on their menus?

让步转折Although后是真意。句首 Although it sounds counter-intuitive（尽管听起来违反直觉）是让步信号，真正的研究结论在它之后——may be unintentionally encouraging customers to eat meat，加上 a new study suggests 与题干 suggest 对应，这就是答案句。

• unintentionally encouraging customers to eat meat↔unintentionally encourage customers to eat meat近乎同形的直接对应

• A)与原文相反A说"无意中帮顾客选更环保的菜"，盗用了开头 moving away from environmentally unfriendly meat towards greener dishes 里的 greener，但那是"餐厅想达到的初衷"，研究的发现恰恰相反——是鼓励吃肉，A把结果方向说反了。

  借用原文：moving away from environmentally unfriendly meat towards greener dishes

• C)未提及C说"提高顾客的环保意识"，听上去与开头 eat more sustainably 沾边，但录音从没说研究发现能"提升意识"，只谈"实际点菜选择"，属于顺着环保话题硬编出来的结论。
• D)未提及D说"让顾客以健康方式进食"，但全篇围绕"环保/吃肉还是吃素"，从未谈"健康"这个角度，属于另起话题的无中生有。

How was the study carried out on 750 participants?

数字750与分组描述句。听到题干里的数字 750 出现在 The study involved 750 people，紧跟其后的 half of whom frequently ate vegetarian food and half of whom rarely ate it 正是研究设计的核心——把人分成"常吃素"和"很少吃素"两组对比，这就是答案句。

• half of whom frequently ate vegetarian food and half of whom rarely ate it↔comparing participants eating vegetarian food frequently with those doing so rarely对照设计的同义改写

• A)偷换概念A说"请他们品尝不同食物"，但录音只让受试者"看菜单选一餐"given different menus and asked to choose a meal，并没有真去吃/尝，属把"选菜单"偷换成"尝食物"。

  借用原文：given different menus and asked to choose a meal

• B)与原文相反B说"观察严格素食者的进食行为"，盗用了原文反复出现的 vegetarian，但录音明说 No vegetarians were included——根本没有素食者参加，更没有"观察其行为"，与原文相反。

  借用原文：No vegetarians were included

• D)原词陷阱D说"要求受试者像在家庭聚会上盛宴那样选餐"，盗用了 asked to choose a meal，但原文的设定是 as if they were eating out with friends（像和朋友外出就餐），不是"家庭聚会盛宴"，场景被偷换。

  借用原文：asked to choose a meal as if they were eating out with friends

How do altered menu designs affect frequent eaters of vegetarian food?

But again转折指向常吃者。But again 是转折信号，前一句讲改菜单让"少吃素的人"更愿点素菜，转折之后才轮到题目问的"常吃素的人"——backfired with those who ate vegetarian food more frequently，结果是 less likely to choose a vegetarian dish，这就是答案句。

• less likely to choose a vegetarian dish↔less likely to choose a vegetarian dish几乎逐字一致

• B)张冠李戴B说"他们觉得素菜更有吸引力"，盗用了原文 a more appealing description of a non-meat meal 里的 appealing，但"更想点素菜"这个正向结果发生在"少吃素的人"身上，题目问的"常吃素的人"恰恰相反，张冠李戴。

  借用原文：a more appealing description of a non-meat meal

• C)未提及C说"他们会吃更多不健康食物"，但录音只谈"是否点素菜"，从没提"吃更大份的不健康食物"，属凭印象编出来的结果。
• D)原词陷阱D说"他们更不可能点主厨推荐的菜"，盗用了原文 presenting a vegetarian dish as the chef's recommendation 里的 chef，但原文说的结果是"更不可能点素菜"，而非"不点主厨推荐的菜"，把对象从"素菜"偷换成"主厨推荐菜"。

  借用原文：presenting a vegetarian dish as the chef's recommendation

What does the passage say about Nottingham Trent University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences?

段首总述句。录音开篇第一句就以两家机构为主语作总述：have been trying to find a way to prevent deadly outdoor air pollution from penetrating indoors，篇章独白的研究目的常在段首点明，这句正是答案句。

• have been trying to find a way↔have been seeking a waytrying to find = seeking
• prevent deadly outdoor air pollution from penetrating indoors↔prevent pollutants from penetrating indoors几乎原句保留

• A)与原文相反A 项盗用了第二段的 global problem 一词，说他们已 found a solution to the global problem，但录音用的是 trying to find a way（还在尝试），并未说已彻底解决全球性难题，把探索说成了已完成，程度过满。

  借用原文：Outdoor air pollution in cities is a global problem

• B)原词陷阱B 项盗用录音第二句的原词 frozen to around –18，但 –18 ℃ 冷冻只是实现目标的手段细节，题目问的是这两家机构在做什么（目的），用手段冒充目的，答非所问。

  借用原文：if pollution is frozen to around –18 ℃ in a condensing tube

• D)偷换概念D 项说两家在合作开发一种新型空调（developing a new type of air-conditioner）；录音只说有望对现有空调做 simple modification of air conditioning units（简单改造），从未说开发新空调，是无中生有式偷换。

  借用原文：simple modification of air conditioning units so that they can also clean polluted indoor air

What do we learn from the passage about existing technologies to purify indoor air?

While 让步后转折出真意。句子以 While there are some existing technologies 让步开头，承认有现有技术，紧接着的 they can be inefficient, expensive 才是真正要说的评价；让步与转折之后的部分是答案落点。

• expensive↔costlyexpensive = costly
• inefficient↔inefficient低效原词对应

• B)与原文相反B 项说现有技术 constantly being perfected（不断完善），是正面评价；但录音对它的评价是 inefficient, expensive or produce harmful by-products（负面），极性正好弄反。

  借用原文：they can be inefficient, expensive or produce harmful by-products

• C)偷换概念C 项盗用录音原词 by-products，但录音说的是现有技术可能 produce harmful by-products（产生有害副产品），C 却说它们本身是健康研究的副产品（by-products of health research），张冠李戴改了主体关系。

  借用原文：produce harmful by-products

• D)原词陷阱D 项盗用录音的醒目数字 40,000，说现有技术每年能救四万多人；但录音里 40,000 讲的是 over 40,000 early deaths in Britain each year（每年四万多人过早死亡），是死亡数而非现有技术挽救的人数，数字对象被错配。

  借用原文：pollution is linked to over 40,000 early deaths in Britain each year

What do people tend to do when outdoor air quality is poor?

题干原词 tend to 直接对应。录音里 When outdoor air quality is poor, people tend to spend even more time indoors 与题干用词几乎一字不差，tend to 这一标志词直接锁定答案句，属顺序定位。

• spend even more time indoors↔spend a lot more time indoorseven more = a lot more

• A)未提及A 项说人们关窗（keep their windows closed），听起来很合常识，但录音从头到尾没提到关窗这个动作，属凭常识脑补、原文未提及。
• C)未提及C 项说人们更多用空调（make more use of air-conditioners），录音里 air conditioning 是讲技术改造方向，并未说人们在空气差时更多使用空调，属常识脑补、原文未提及人们这一行为。
• D)张冠李戴D 项盗用话题原词 purify indoor air，但录音里净化室内空气是技术/研究要做的事，不是人们在空气差时采取的做法，主体被张冠李戴。

  借用原文：While there are some existing technologies to purify indoor air

What did Professor Gang Pan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences say about their study?

专家引语中的用途句。在专家 Professor Gang Pan 的引语里，Our study makes it possible to add an air cleaner option to household appliances 直接点出研究的实际用途，是被引用原话中评价研究意义的关键句，即答案句。

• add an air cleaner option to household appliances↔make household appliances serve an additional air cleaner functionadd option = additional function

• A)过度推断A 项说研究显示了消除室内污染的重要性（importance of eliminating indoor pollution）；录音里专家说的是 By controlling indoor air pollution（控制污染）并讲其用途，并未把重点放在论证消除污染有多重要上，A 拔高且偏离原话。

  借用原文：By controlling indoor air pollution and improving air quality in this way

• B)过度推断B 项说研究可能改变未来环境研究的方式（change the way of future environmental research），录音里专家只谈本研究的用途与对公共健康的好处，从未说会改变未来研究的方式，属无中生有的拔高。
• C)原词陷阱C 项说研究证明了中英科学家的成功合作（cooperation between UK and Chinese scientists），录音开头确有两家机构合作的事实 Nottingham Trent University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences，但题目问专家对研究本身说了什么，专家原话谈的是用途而非合作，借合作事实答非所问。

  借用原文：Nottingham Trent University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences have been trying to find a way

What do we learn about the well-known mirror test?

下定义句 This is a test that…。录音用 This is a test that demonstrates self-recognition in animals 这样的"This is a test that…"下定义句式，直接点出测试的功能，这种"给某物下定义"的句子就是细节题的答案句信号。

• demonstrates self-recognition in animals↔demonstrates animals' ability to recognize themselves名词↔动词的同义改写

• A)原词陷阱录音里确实念到 A certain species of fish 的 species（物种），选项 distinguishes different species of animals 就盗用这个词造"分辨物种"，但测试是测"自我识别"，不是分辨物种，听到 species 就选会中招。

  借用原文：A certain species of fish

• B)偷换概念录音通篇讲 behavior、behavioral，选项 reflects distinct traits in animal behavior 盗用 behavior 造"反映行为的不同特征"，但测试反映的是"能否自我识别"，不是"区分行为差异"，概念被悄悄换掉。

  借用原文：This ability suggests a level of higher intelligence and awareness

• D)过度推断录音说 This ability suggests a level of higher intelligence，选项 gauges the level of intelligence of various animal species 盗用 intelligence 和 level 造"测量各物种智力等级"，但原文是"自我识别这种能力暗示了较高智力"，测试本身测的是自我识别，不是给智力分级。

  借用原文：This ability suggests a level of higher intelligence and awareness

What does the study by the speaker's team show about the fish they experimented with?

结果断言 leave little doubt that…。录音用 leave little doubt that this fish behaviorally fulfills all criteria"几乎无疑地满足全部标准"这种强结果断言，是实验给出的核心结论，正是答案句信号。

• fulfills all criteria of the mirror test↔behaves similarly to animals capable of self-recognition满足标准=行为同已通过者

• A)与原文相反录音念到 criteria，但说的是 fulfills all criteria（满足全部标准），选项 meets few of the behavioral criteria 盗用 criteria 却改成"几乎不满足"，把肯定听成了否定，正好反了。

  借用原文：fulfills all criteria of the mirror test

• C)偷换概念录音确有 scrape up against hard surfaces to remove marks"蹭掉身上标记"，选项 removes marks from itself to show self-awareness 盗用 remove marks，但把它直接等同于"展示自我意识"——而录音第三段明说"是否算自我意识尚不清楚"，这是把现象当定论，偷换了概念。

  借用原文：scrape up against hard surfaces to remove marks placed on its body

• D)张冠李戴录音 This is not shown by children until around 18 months 里的 18 个月是说"人类儿童到约18个月才有此能力"，选项 matches children over 18 months in intelligence 盗用这个数字，硬说"鱼的智力等同18个月以上的儿童"，把讲儿童的话安到鱼头上。

  借用原文：This is not shown by children until around 18 months

What does the speaker say about the results of their research?

结尾定调句 Results… raise…。末段以 Results from our research raise more questions than answers 开篇，是讲者对整项研究结果的收束定调，这种"结尾一句话总评结果"正是答案句信号。

• raise more questions than answers↔They raise more questions than answers.近乎原句对应

• A)与原文相反录音多次提 criteria，选项 conclusively established the criteria of animal intelligence 盗用并说"已确凿确立动物智力标准"，但末段恰恰说"问题更多"、还呼吁 stop looking at responses to the mirror as a decisive test，根本没"确立"，反了。

  借用原文：stop looking at responses to the mirror as a decisive test

• B)过度推断录音满是 self-awareness，选项 advanced the concept of self-awareness to a higher level 盗用这个词造"把自我意识概念提升到更高层次"，听着很顺，但录音说的是结果带来更多疑问、要换更丰富的理论，并未声称"提升了概念层次"。

  借用原文：Only with a richer theory of the self and a larger test battery will we be able to determine all of the various levels of self-awareness

• C)未提及选项 incorporate more perspectives than one 和正确项 raise more questions than answers 都是 more…than… 句式，长得像；但录音结果说的是"问题比答案多"，没说"纳入多个视角"，C 是借相似句式硬凑、原文无对应。

What finding from the new study might come as a huge surprise?

转折 but…might 指向真正的意外。录音先用 may not come as a huge surprise 把"小孩爱电子书"排掉，紧接 but the following additional findings might 一个转折，明确告诉你"意外的发现"在 but 之后；冒号后并列两条，其中 the children who read the electronic books learned more 正是答案落点。

• the children who read the electronic books learned more↔Children reading electronic books learned more近乎同义、仅句式微调

• A)原词陷阱Small children are even more keen on screens than their elders. 借用了录音 small children are generally keen on screens 的原词，但录音说这是"也许并不令人意外"的前提，与题面要的"意外发现"正相反，听到 keen on screens 就选会中招。

  借用原文：small children are generally keen on screens

• B)偷换概念Both parents and children preferred to read electronic books. 套用了录音 both parents and children behaved differently 里的 both parents and children，却把 behaved differently（表现不同）偷换成 preferred to read electronic books（都偏爱电子书），原文从没说父母也偏爱电子书。

  借用原文：both parents and children behaved differently

• C)答非所问Parents differed from children in reading behavior. 确实对应 both parents and children behaved differently，本身没说错，但题干特别问"令人意外"的发现，录音的 surprise 落点落在"孩子学得更多"上；C 是 but 后并列的发现之一，却不是题面聚焦的那一条，被更贴题的 D 比下去。

  借用原文：both parents and children behaved differently

What do we learn about previous studies of young children reading electronic books?

but 把两拨研究结论正反对置。录音先说 multiple studies have found that electronic books support story comprehension and vocabulary gains（电子书有利），再用 But there's also work suggesting that children sometimes invest less mental effort（也有研究说不利）一转，正反两拨研究结论摆在一起——这正是"结论相互矛盾"的信号。

• multiple studies have found that electronic books support story comprehension and vocabulary gains↔They came to conflicting conclusions正反两面概括为"矛盾"

• B)未提及They were based on small samples. 谈以往研究的样本量，但录音讲 previous studies 时只对比了结论方向，全程没说过样本大小，属凭"评价研究常谈样本"的常识硬填。
• C)张冠李戴They yielded unanticipated findings. 里 unanticipated 蹭了第 1 段 huge surprise 的"意外"概念，但那是形容"本次新研究"的发现；本题问的是 previous studies（以往研究），张冠李戴。

  借用原文：but the following additional findings might

• D)偷换概念They were focused on younger kids. 借了录音反复出现的 young children 概念，但录音说的是"也有针对 older children 的研究"，并未限定以往研究都只盯更小的孩子，把研究对象范围说窄了。

  借用原文：there's research on older children

What extra features should be included in electronic books to bolster children's learning?

however + if 否定句给出条件。录音先承认 Extra features…may increase children's participation，再用 however, if these features don't draw attention to the educational content, they may not serve as a supportive feature 反转——用"如果不指向教育内容就没用"反推出"要指向教育内容才有用"，答案落在 if 否定句里。

• if these features don't draw attention to the educational content, they may not serve as a supportive feature↔Those that draw their attention to the educational content否定条件转正面、原词点对

• A)原词陷阱Those that prove simple enough for them to comprehend. 蹭了第 5 段 the electronic books in the study were simple 的 simple，但那只是描述研究所用电子书的特点，录音从没说"简单到能懂"是促进学习该加的功能，听到 simple 就选会落坑。

  借用原文：the electronic books in the study were simple

• B)原词陷阱Those that produce both audio and visual effects on them. 直接搬录音 they included background music, animation and sound effects 的音乐、动画、音效，这些恰是"声光效果"，但录音的落点是"光有这些额外功能、若不指向教育内容就没用"，B 把被否定的诱饵当成了答案。

  借用原文：they included background music, animation and sound effects

• D)偷换概念Those that contribute to their increased interest in reading. 像是改写自录音 Extra features…may increase children's participation，但录音说的是 increase participation（提高参与度），并把它和"促进学习"区分开（参与高未必学得好），选项把它换成 increased interest in reading（提高阅读兴趣）且当成促学习的条件，偷换且跑题。

  借用原文：Extra features in electronic books may increase children's participation with them

What should we do with the unfavorable decisions we've made?

反问加 No 的强烈否定。does that mean we should regret them? No! 用'反问 + 斩钉截铁的 No'把态度顶到最高：不该后悔。这种自问自答后紧跟否定的句子，正是演讲者亮出主张的答案信号。

• does that mean we should regret them? No!↔Keep ourselves from regretting them'不该后悔'＝'避免后悔'

• A)原词陷阱A 把原文里 living your life full of regrets, you're wasting your time 的两个原词 regret 和 wasting time 拼到一起，做成 Regret having wasted much time in making them.，但原文说'后悔本身是浪费时间'，A 却变成'为浪费时间而后悔'，听到原词就选必中招。

  借用原文：living your life full of regrets, you're wasting your time

• B)与原文相反原文 just because things could be different, it doesn't necessarily mean they would be better 是在否定'设想不同会更好'，B 项 Think how different we could have made them. 却把这件被否定的事当成'应该做的'，正话反说，与原意相左。

  借用原文：just because things could be different, it doesn't necessarily mean they would be better

• D)未提及Live with them for the time being. 主张'暂且与这些决定共处'，但原文从头到尾讲的是'别后悔、向前看'，并没有说'暂且忍受'这种过渡性态度，属于无中生有。

What does the speaker say about every single decision we've ever made?

题干原词在句首直接成句。原文 Every single decision you've ever made, positive or negative, has made you the person you are today 句首即题干原话 every single decision，紧接着的 has made you the person you are today 就是对它的评价，是直接成句的答案信号。

• has made you the person you are today↔It has made us the person we are now几乎同义、仅人称与 today/now 替换

• B)未提及It has been made with a lot of thinking. 说决定是'经过大量思考做出的'，但原文评价决定时说的是它'造就了今天的你'，并没有谈决定是否深思熟虑，属无中生有。
• C)原词陷阱C 搬来原文 the valuable knowledge from the lessons we learned 里的 valuable knowledge，做成 It stems from our valuable knowledge.，但原文是说'回到过去会失去这份宝贵知识'，并非说决定'源自'知识，盗原词且因果方向反了。

  借用原文：the valuable knowledge from the lessons we learned

• D)答非所问It benefits us greatly one way or another. 说决定'总能大大有益'，虽与全篇基调沾边，但原文评价 every single decision 的具体说法是'造就了今天的你'，D 是脱离答案句的笼统概括，并非演讲者此处的原话。

  借用原文：Every single decision you've ever made, positive or negative, has made you the person you are today

What is life full of according to the speaker?

题干句式原样出现。原文 Life is full of lessons to learn 与题干句式 full of 一字不差，紧跟其后的 lessons to learn 即是要填的中心词，是句式复刻型的答案信号。

• Life is full of lessons to learn↔Lessons to learn原句中心词直接对应选项

• C)原词陷阱Choices to make. 借了原文反复出现的 the choices you do 里的 choices，与 decisions 近义、特别像，但 full of 后面原文念的是 lessons to learn 不是 choices，听到近义词就选会被换走。

  借用原文：the choices you do

• A)未提及Challenging things to do. 形式上凑成并列项，但原文 full of 后并没有念 challenging things，演讲者也没说人生充满挑战，属于未提及。
• B)未提及Beautiful things to share. 听起来很正能量，但原文 full of 后是 lessons to learn，从未提'美好的可分享之物'，靠基调相近蒙人。

What is said to be of real importance when we make poor decisions in life?

but 转折 + that matters 强调。but it's what you do with the lessons learned that matters 既有转折 but 把重点拉到后半句，又用 it's…that matters 的强调结构点出'真正要紧的'，双重信号锁定答案句。

• what you do with the lessons learned that matters↔Making proper use of the lessons learned'如何运用教训'＝'恰当运用教训'

• A)原词陷阱A 搬来原文 there will always be a possibility for regret later 几乎整句，做成 Foreseeing the possibility for regret later.，但原文这半句只是陈述'总会有后悔的可能'，并不是 that matters 强调的'真正重要的事'，盗整句却答非所问。

  借用原文：there will always be a possibility for regret later

• C)未提及Perfecting the decision-making strategies. 说要'完善决策策略'，听着合理，但原文强调的是'用好已学到的教训'，并没有让你去优化决策方法，属无中生有。
• D)与原文相反D 搬来原文 we can't let regret stop us from moving forward 里的 moving forward 与 obstacle 之意，做成 Seeing them as obstacles to moving forward.，但原文是'别让后悔挡住前进'，演讲者恰恰反对把决定当障碍，D 把意思反了。

  借用原文：we can't let regret stop us from moving forward